Free Essay

Military Spending

In: Social Issues

Submitted By lizayang
Words 1621
Pages 7
Should Government Limit the Military Spending?

There is a product, each country only have one. To buy it, everybody in this country should dig their pocket. This product is named military spending. With the large amounts of research and the development of high technology weapons, regional warming of local wars, armed conflicts, and intensified arms race, the series of a new arms race, military deployment and new high-growth military spending boost are being performed on the international stage. However, governments are concerned about seeking “peace via war”. As the arms trade is the major cause of suffering for human beings, governments should limit their military spending; nobody in the world wants war.

Under such rhetoric combined with powerful lobbying of the military industries, governments are intentionally aiding military, because the military spending is an important indicator to reflect the dimension of a country’s military strength, and also a major factor of the military strength. As it is a serious issue in the world and so important for every country, every country values this issue as a primary one and pay special attention on it. As each country has different situation and government systems, there are different views towards military spending. Some people suggest increasing the military spending while some people suggest governments to cut the military spending.

Some people think that government should keep increasing the military spending, the reasons are as following. The first reason is to better defend the country’s territorial integrity and non-violation by other countries, and to create a peaceful and stable environment for the state which is an indispensable condition for economic development. For example, in Middle East, the military spending is an important factor that affects the peace among those countries. According to the article “The Arms Trade in the Middle East Will Lead to Greater Stability,” “the success of Israel’s peace with Egypt and Jordan is heavily dependent on American military aid to Egypt.” Since they have a relative balance on their military, the conflicts between them will decrease, because nobody wants conflict under a balance of strength situation, and it is hard to predict who will win in the conflict and whether the benefit is greater than the deficit (Brookes).

Second, most people will think that the more military they have, the higher defense of the government has because in their mind, defense is an obligation, not an option. For example, some people suggest that the government should not cut the military spending; they believe that if they have weapons of a huge amount and high quality, they will feel safer. As cited in the article “Don’t Cut Military Spending,” “national defense is a higher priority than other areas of federal activity,” the national defense is the most important part of a country and is also important to the people who lived in this country. (Talent) The government cutting the military spending is the same as cutting their security. Although, the theme of the world is peace, if the country is of less strength in military, then it will bullied by other countries.

Third, increasing military spending will lead to an arms trade, and the arms trade is the biggest interest in the world. Such as America, is the biggest arms seller in the world, the money it gains by arms trade is unaccountable. The United government can use the money to develop the technology, economy and the education. That is also an important reason for America to become a super power in the world, so increasing military spending is also good for the development of the economy.

Although there are many people who suggest do not cutting the military spending, still some people strongly suggest that the governments to cut the military spending. The most important reason may be that the increase of military will lead to an arms race among countries and increase insecurity. As the more powerful countries show less commitment in reducing their own arms substantially and continue to pursue their own national interests, they affect many others around the world, such as in the Middle East, as arms race is increasing, there is an arms trade spread out in Middle East, but it makes this area more unstable. As cited in the article “The Arms Trade in the Middle East Could Lead to a Dangerous Arms Race,” “Middle Eastern states are taking steps to shore up their security.” So the Middle Eastern states are keeping buying weapons from the developed countries. Such as Russia, Britain, the US, and also several developing countries as China, North Korea, these countries are the players of the arms race in Middle Eastern states; they are selling weapons to them that make this area more instable.

The second reason is the more military spending a government have the more possible it is to have unchecked arms trade. There is a misunderstanding of the military spending; the more they spend on military the more safety they will gain. Every country wants higher security so they seek more arms trade to buy more military to increase the level of security and military strength. Then there will be more unchecked arms trade occurred. As a result of unchecked arms trade, the country will more easily be involved in a conflict. As cited in the article “Unchecked Arms Trade Fuelling Conflict, Poverty,” “if a country is likely to be involved in warfare, then it is unjustifiable to sell arms. There must be regulation or control of arms especially when the countries that are buying them are involved in a conflict.” (Karlsson) Furthermore, due to the unchecked arms trade, weapons are easily to get into the wrong hands which are dangerous for people’s security, such as terrorisms, because as cited in the article “Arms Trade,” “the prospect for greater security worldwide is greatly enhanced when weapons do not fall into the wrong hands.”

The third reason is increase military will increase the danger of the world. The world’s theme is peace, but the arms trade- side effect of military spending is a major suffering of human beings. We don’t need weapons in a peaceful world. According to “The US Should Cut Military Spending in Half,” “Americans should prepare for fewer wars, not different ones.” After event 911, US government keeps increasing military spending, that is not to reduce the effect of that event but to lead to the Iraq war which spends a huge amount of money. During the war time lot of people are in a stressful emotion. So people want governments to cut military spending instead to have a peaceful environment (Friedmen).

Some other reasons might be that increasing military spending is a kind of waste of resources. Because this is a peaceful society, there shouldn't be much more conflicts among countries. Spending a lot of money to buy military is useless for the development of the country. The governments need a defense budget worthy of the name and they need military restraint. The weapons they bought will not use in their daily life and will not work well for them. They want their money to work and don’t waste every single dollar.

In my opinion, I suggest the government cut the military spending. In an increasingly peaceful social environment, weapons are not the only way to solve the problem. Instead, what people need is a more stable and peaceful social environment. In such a society of peace and stability, it is benefiting for the rapid development of the country, and people can live a long life. So reducing or cutting military spending is a win-win solution. Neither the illegal arms trade, nor the horrible terrorists’ attacks will happen. There is even no war between nations; the whole world is surrounded by peace, so it is good for the development of human civilization. Even if the country has a highly spend of military, that does not means it can control over the world. The military is just a tool to protect the country from the outside attack and increase the sense of security. It doesn't means an over controlling power in the world, no matter who you are.

In conclusion, although people have different views on military spending, the world’s theme which is peace and it won’t change. Peace is the base of development. No matter how much a country spends on their military that does not mean another country, which spends more money on military, can control over it. However, several countries strongly agree with increasing their military spending thinking it will elevate their status in the world. It may not be wrong, but it is not exactly true. Military spending is just a factor that determines a country’s defense level and military strength.

Work Cited

“Arms Trade.” Current Issues: Macmillian Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.

Brookes, Peter. “The Arms Trade in the Middle East Could Lead to a Dangerous Arms Race.” Armed Forces Journal 145 (Nov. 2007): 8-10. Rpt. in The Arms Trade. Ed. Noel Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.

Cordesman, Anthony H. “The Arms Trade in the Middle East Will Lead to Greater Stability.” International Herald Tribune (16 Aug. 2007). Rpt. in The Arms Trade. Ed. Noel Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.

Friedman, Benjamin H. “The US should cut military spending in half.” The Christian Science Monitor. 27 April 2009. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.

Karlsson, Ida. “Unchecked Arms Trade Fuelling Conflict, Poverty.” Inter Press Service. 2010. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.

Talent, Jim. “Don’t Cut Military Spending.” National Review Online. 04 Nov 2010. Web. 22 Nov 2010.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

U.S. Military Spending and Its Impact on the Economy’s Gdp

...U.S. Military Spending and its impact on the Economy’s GDP Matthew Magana Abstract This paper examines whether increases in military spending have a positive or negative impact on the U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The paper focuses on the three North American economies: Canada, Mexico and the United States as models to develop a case. It will also illustrate the utilization of multiple economic tools to produce variable outcomes to analyze the full spectrum of economics. It will also discuss the multiple statistical models such as Granger causality and Vector autoregression and the asymmetric results produced. Increased U.S. Military Spending and its impact on the Economy Given the long-accepted, theoretical direct relationship between investment and economic growth, if defense spending has a negative impact on investment, then it would seem reasonable that defense spending would have an adverse impact on economic growth. This was exactly the findings of two studies published in the seventies, zymanski (1973) and Lee (1973). Some studies attribute the negative effect of defense spending on economic growth to reduced investment. Another study argues that defense spending restricts export growth and economic growth because military expenditures compete for the same resources used in the production of exports. Which may also be a understood trade off for military spending vs. export and economic growth. However, other studies were unable to find any......

Words: 1973 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay


...Obama and Congress have identified several areas in which the U.S. can reduce spending. The Federal Government is projected to spend $925.2 billion on their Department of Defense budget. Those funds include but are not limited to costs of military combat equipment, installations, salaries, retirement, and healthcare. Among those, the Active Duty, Retirees, and Military families’ healthcare is currently proposed to be cut saving the Federal Government approximately $1.8 billion by 2013. TRICARE, the health care program for active duty, retirees, and military families, was enacted May 1997. TRICARE replaced Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services “CHAMPUS” and was intended to increase quality of care for eligible beneficiaries. TRICARE has several different plans that make up the overall TRICARE health care program. TRICARE Prime the plan for active duty, their dependents and retired personnel. TRICARE Prime is a HMO style plan with no enrollment fee. Beneficiaries have a primary care provider, typically at a military installation’s medical facility; they see and attain referrals from for all specialty care. TRICARE Reserve Select is available to all military reservists. TRICARE Reserve Select has a monthly premium and allows beneficiaries to see civilian healthcare providers that are payable under TRICARE regulations. In May 2001 TIRCARE for life was added for retired military personnel and their families who prior to TFL lost their TRICARE benefits......

Words: 1028 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Decline of the Mahdist State

...administration and created their own centralized administration and the high income taxes the previous rulers had and replaced it with less demanding and lighter taxes of the Koran. The Mahdist state was structured in states that had military governments that would maintain control. Khalifa was ambitious It seemed like he knew what he was doing. Khalifa was very ambitious that he made an oath to serve the Mahdi until victory was achieved. All was going to plan and Khalifa knew what the Mahdist people wanted but the process of creating his dream was too much of a task for Khalifa. Khalifa seemed he wasn’t ready to lead the Mahdist state. Since the Mahdist state had collapsed only after 13 years, the collapse shows he was not ready for ruling a state. Many factors led up to the decline of the Mahdist Empire. Khalifa had created his own administration and reduce the heavy taxes to the Koran taxes that the Mahdist state was before the Turko-Egyptians came in. With taxes put down that meant there would be less income for Khalifa to use on his administration. He didn’t have enough money to satisfy the needs of the local military governments that he created; he didn’t have enough money to be able to spend for the Mahdist state and for his own private spending. With Khalifa not really good at economics and finance he failed at creating a centralised economy that would function well. That is a major problem because for a leader to be successful in ruling a country and developing a......

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...need to be an asset to the business. The hiring process cannot be discriminatory in any way. If this were to occur there could be a potential lawsuit. How we treat customers is also something that needs to be looked at in a legal sense. There should not be any maltreatment of customers. There are also ethical responsibilities that need to be taken in to consideration, as employees of that business. All businesses rely on a customer base, and that customer base is dependent on the society that we serve. The establishment that I work at is on a military instillation. With that being said, we serve single military members as well as military families. We must cater to both types of social groups. Working for a business that is on a military base, we have to know when they are being paid. This needs to be known so that we can schedule accordingly. Also the business needs to know the economy and the economic standing of the non-military that work on or near the base. This needs to be monitored so that we know when there will peaks and troughs. The management structure at Oasis Pizzeria and Sports Bar is a chain of command. We have operations supervisors, operations managers, facility managers, and a flight chief. All of which report to the squadron commander. Working on a militaty base has an endless amount of bosses. Say this because of the fact that not only do we have to work for the commander that is above us, we also have to work for all of the commanders that are on......

Words: 761 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

China Threat Theory

...China’s development and their economic growth relies on peaceful relations with the West because China needs access to their domestic markets. The main reason why China is considered to be a threat to the West is because they cannot maintain their domination on the world stage, and has to make room for developing nations like the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa). Yet China simply wants to develop and increase the living standards of its people, and no desire of aggressive military actions. Thus, the foundation of why China is still been seen as a threat will be explored but the conception will be dismissed because as a growing superpower these steps are logical and any country that is in the same situation as China now will simply follow the same road. The following paper will examine different viewpoints regarding if the China threat theory is feasible or not; in order to come to the above conclusion. The United States perspective on China’s military progress Based on the information stated in the United States Department of Defense report (2011) it represent as though China is a possible threat especially if it...

Words: 1324 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Russian Emperors

...Nicholas I • Was the third son of Czar Paul I, he had few chances of ever gaining the throne. o Not seen as a possible heir, thus was educated accordingly. o His upbringing was strict, flogging was common and few efforts were made to motivate the young student. • Was attracted to engineering and military affairs, especially enjoying the drills and luster of parades. • His eldest brother, Czar Alexander I, was childless. o Paul’s second son and next in line for succession, Constantine, renounced the throne. o Left Nicholas an apparent heir. • Didn’t feel ready to rule, realizing he lacked necessary skills & knowledge. o His lifestyle didn’t change. o Wasn’t taking part in state affairs & was unpopular among soldiers; was disliked for his ruthlessness and fault-finding. • The sudden death of Alexander I, in November 1825 plunged Russia’s monarchy into turmoil. o Army swore allegiance to Constantine. o Having no support, Nicholas was prepared to give up power. • After Constantine confirmed his refusal, Nicholas declared himself emperor o A plot was hatched by the military to overthrow Nicholas and to usurp power.  Led to the Decembrist Revolt on 26 December 1825  Nicholas was successful in suppressing the uprising. • Fighting revolutionary ideas & dissent became Nicholas’ obsession o In the early 1830s, he brutally crushed a Polish rebellion, reducing Poland to the status of a Russian province. o In 1848 he sent troops to suppress a Hungarian......

Words: 1224 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Us Religious Hegemony

...still remain a global hegemon? Hegemony is the political, economic, or military predominance or control of one state over others. This power is based on the countries structural position which enables the hegemon to shape the actions and influence other states by using soft power (Soft power is the ability to shape the preferences of others through appeal and attraction via politics, culture and foreign policies) more often than not rather than hard power (Hard power is the use of military and economic means to influence the behavior or interests of other political bodies aggressively) and use of force. The US is commonly known as a superpower or ‘hegemon’ though this idea has been challenged by both external and internal factors like the economic prowess of other countries like China who’s rise has been astonishing and are projected to overtake the USA by 2030 as the greatest financial power. If judged in military terms then the USA appears to remain dominant, their lead over the rest of the world is huge. In 2011, the US accounted for 42% of the world’s military spending and had a x5 fold lead over China, the second largest military spender. The US has around 700 military bases around the world as well as an unequivocal lead in high tech weaponry that can intervene militarily in any part of the world and sustain multiple operations like in Afghanistan and Iraq. Though, their power in military terms could be rendered redundant due to their lack of achievements......

Words: 930 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Military Life Versus Civilian Life

...Lauri Goodling English 1101 September 27, 2010 Military Life vs. Civilian life Life in the military offers many benefits that are not available to most people living a civilian life. Joining the military is a defining moment in a person’s life and has long-term effects on his or her immediate family. The sacrifices of a soldier may include long absence from home and family, deployment to dangerous places, and uncertainty of personal safety. Nonetheless, the benefits of serving in the military outweigh any conceived possibility of danger, discomfort, or homesickness. The military provides education/specialized training and healthcare, creates jobs, and offers opportunities for traveling to different places in the world. The current state of the job market in America is very limited to those with little education or any specialized training. For civilians seeking a new career, they are forced with having to pay for the training unlike their military counterparts. The military has a wide range of occupational specialties (MOS) from which any service member can choose upon entering or at any time during their career. Unlike civilians who usually must maintain a job in order to have an income, military personnel are paid while in school learning occupational skills. Along with the expense of paying for training, civilians also must seek employment on their own and can choose to work anywhere they want. Adversely, military personnel do not have the option of choosing......

Words: 1133 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Co 2520 Final Paper

...Due 18August2015 Communication in the United States Army … “an order that be misunderstood be misunderstood.” Field Marshal Helmuth von Moltke Communication in the United States Army is arguably the single most vital aspect in waging effective and overpowering warfare. On average the United States Army spends around 1.8billion dollars on communication equipment procurement and upkeep the shocking part is this number does not cover the cost of training individual soldiers or research and development of new communication technology’s it is exclusive to procurement and maintenance of equipment and materials. The history of communication in military’s goes back as far as written history with the first battle ever recorded in the 15th century BC the battle of Megiddo where the Egyptian forces under command of Pharaoh Thutmose III attacked a price of Kadesh who was holding the key city of Megiddo. The use of horns was recorded signaling the order to attack. Up in until the mid-19th century the common methods of communication ranged from a runner carrying a letter, a man on a horse taking a message hundreds of miles as was the case with the infamous Paul Revere, to being told what to do by the change of rhythm of a drum or horn, even flags have been widely used to signal units that were to attack to come forward or to convey a rally point for soldiers in the heat of battle. As archaic and non-functional as these methods seem to us today it wasn’t until the 1830s and the......

Words: 897 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Sharing Power? Prospects for a U.S. Concert-Balance Strategy

...detrimental. The level of withdrawal required could be viewed as the United States is abandoning its allies and with it destroying our credibility. A move to an over-the-horizon balancer may be a better alternative type of concert-balance strategy with today’s world political landscape. The growing multipolarity of the world political entities has to be taken into consideration in a shift in America’s strategic posture. The continued economic and military growth in China, the military reemergence of Russia and continual posturing of Iran helps advance the argument for a shift to a concert-balance strategy, with an emphasis on an over-the-horizon form. Countries like Germany, India, and Japan should be leveraged to allow them to emerge as regional balancers. Furthering these alliances regionally would allow the United States to maintain its strategic position and to balance while reducing its footprint.2 Further, support for this shift in strategy is the mounting debt of the United States and the current restructuring of our military more specifically our Army. As our national debt continues to grow and the constraints on our military’s resources mount, a change in strategy is paramount....

Words: 949 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Sec 320 Week 1 Assignment

...assignment 1) Threat, risk, hazard, and peril all fall under the same category but have different meanings. A threat is an intention of causing harm. A risk is a situation with possible danger. A hazard is danger or risk itself. Peril is severe and abrupt danger. I will build a scenario to show the use of these words in proper context. A military network does not have a physical firewall nor a software based antivirus. The threat is other countries wanting to inflict damage to this military base via cyber warfare. The risk needs two things, the threat which we just established, and vulnerability which is the lack of security measures in place within the network. The hazard is the danger of crippling the military network and or the sensitive information being lost to the attackers. The network is now under a denial of service attack inflicted by hackers from North Korea. The network is now under Peril. Overall these words are sometimes used in place of each other even though they have a specific context that they should be used in. 2) There are many things that are considered threats, risks, hazards, and perils in my organization. Working on a military base presents a great amount of these things. Our Security team must prepare to defend the environment from the threats of terrorism, active shooters, natural disasters, cyber-attacks, and more. They have a constant risk of personnel getting killed, buildings getting destroyed, and information getting stolen. The......

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Sequester Policy

...act (Budget Control Act). This act was passed in August of 2011. The budget cuts are supposed to equal over a trillion dollars total! This is supposed to continue from the year of 2013 to the year 2021 divided perfectly in the 9 year time period. They are also evenly split between defense spending and discretionary spending, which is spending on things like medicaid and social security. Just for the year of 2013, the cuts total cost came to a total of one hundred and nine billion dollars. (Suzy, 2012). The Sequester was actually designed in 2011 to force The Joint Select Comittee on The Super-committee to agree on a reduction package. The sequester will dramatically save a lot of money each year, saving 940 billion dollars and interest by 200 billion dollars. Nine tenths of the savings actually come from discretionary appropriations. Majority of the madatory programs, this including (social security, medicaid, food stamps, and verterans' benefits) are not included for the sequestation. Of course there are more that will be exempt, but those are the fast majority of them. Not only will the defense spending be cut by almost ten percent, while the majority of the non-exempt, non-defense spending by nearly seven percent, medicare by two percent, and other madatories by seven percent. (Understanding the Sequester. 2010, January 1). With the expiration of Bush's tax cuts and the payroll cut, this would have greatly resulted to a huge contraction, almost positively throwing the......

Words: 2494 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Are You in ?

...CMST 301 Final Paper Are you in? Military recruiting is challenging not only because of the scale of the recruiting mission, but also because of the current environment in which recruiting takes place. Alternatives to military service are more attractive to young people. To meet its human capital needs, the Department of Defense must convince about 200,000 people each year – the majority of them recent high school graduations – to join the military (United States General Accounting Office). To assist in this recruiting effort, the military services advertise on television, on radio, in print, and on the Internet; sponsor sports teams; and participate in other promotional activities. During World War II, the primary means of advertisement were posters, magazine and newspaper articles, and television and radio spots. Propaganda in the 40’s were predominantly the main source of advertising that the American’s used to increase support for the war and commitment to Allied victory. Their message was unambiguous; Consumers must economize on goods and services, recycle waste and scrap, plant Victory Gardens and can the vegetables, comply with the price controls and rationing laws, and put discretionary income into war bonds. Television, radio and movie theatres were the main sources utilized to get the message out to people in a rapid manner. However, television wasn’t widely available in the 1940’s because it was still a relatively new invention. Those that had money......

Words: 1639 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Value Proposition

...In addition to pursuing his MBA at the University of Chicago, he is also attending the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. His prior education includes a Bachelor of Science in Systems Engineering from the United States Naval Academy. When he is not spending time with his family, flying, or studying, Mark enjoys following sports, especially the New York Yankees and the Green Bay Packers. He’s also an avid woodworker, skier, guitarist, and enjoys world travel, whether it be with the Navy or just for pleasure. This past fall, he took part in the University of Chicago Global Immersion Experience that visited Peru. After ten years of naval service, which included deployments, extensive travel, and a generally fast-paced lifestyle, Mark is finally at a point in his career that allows for more down time, which he believes is an ideal opportunity to further his education. He plans to spend another 10 years in the Navy, reach full military retirement, and then pursue to a career in business. Mark recognizes the difficulty of bridging his military experience with corporate America, and believes that an MBA will assist him with the professional vernacular and business background needed to transition from a military career. Once Mark decided to pursue an MBA, he began to explore his options. Due to his dynamic work schedule, an online MBA was the only viable option....

Words: 980 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

American Power unique from another. We have fought and earned our power that we have today. Our military, freedom, our education is why we have such a powerful country. Our military is the strongest in the world. Our military’s power began in world war two and from then on out the military has prospered. When we helped defeat the German army, we showed our power to the world because we had defeated the most evil man is the world, saving around several thousand jews. We have been involved in many other battles and wars, like Vietnam. Even though we didn’t succeed in winning, we showed the world how relentless we are to help anyone in need and that we wont stand down, by fighting in a war and loosing over 58 thousand American soldiers. These wars have made our military become the most skilled and technologically advanced in the world. We have an army, navy, and an air force that are patrolling and protecting America twenty-four hours a day. We are always under protection and it makes the people of America comfortable. It allows the people to live without fear unlike other countries that live with the fear of dying everyday. We are very fortunate to have a military that is on the frontlines everyday to keep us out of harms way and to keep America progressing every day to new heights. The untied states army spends around 685 billion dollars a year on funding our army. The only closet nation to spending as much as us is china at around 114 billion dollars a year. Also we have the......

Words: 1247 - Pages: 5