Moral Issue

In: Social Issues

Submitted By chrisxwx
Words 549
Pages 3
The Case of ‘Made in The U.S.A.- Dumped in Brazil, Africa, Iraq…’ brings up the controversial issues of dumping, a term that refers to the practice of exporting to other countries products that have been banded or declared hazardous in the United States.Is it moral to dump U.S. banned products overseas? Both the manufactures and the consumers have valid arguments.
As a consumer of these dangerous products being dumped on overseas markets one could argue the manufacturers lack of respect for life. It should be in the company’s best interest to take in consideration the health and safety of people and animals. These manufactures are knowingly making dangerous and even deadly products available to communities in third world countries. DowElanco sold its weed killer Galant in Costa Rica, although the Environmental Protection Agency forbade its sale to U.S. farmers because Galant may cause cancer. These companies need to take in consideration the burden/ benefit factor; the safety of others should be more important than the profit losses. It is clear that these manufacturers are not interested in the sustainability of our own bioregion. While dangerous pesticides are banned from the U.S. for containing deadly poison dioxin, the active ingredient in Agent Orange, these pesticides are routinely used in agriculture overseas.These toxic products are making their way back into the U.S. market trough the exporting of produce from Mexico to the United States. Most of the time the countries accepting U.S. banned products are unaware of their harmfulness.
Manufacturers that dump products abroad are motivated by profit, and the hope of avoiding financial losses resulting from having to withdraw a product from the U.S. market.Some companies see dumping as a last resort in order to ensure sustainability and avoid millions of dollars in losses. Dumping is an issue of equity/…...

Similar Documents

Moral Acts

... believe in God or a God? Are they subject to the same way of thinking that the religious people are? After all, the Divine Command Theory is clear and concise about what constitutes a good, moral act and where it came from. Tuggy goes on to simplify this dilemma by phrasing the question in more lamen terms. He writes that an act is right or wrong only if there is a law for or against it (Tuggy, 54). Understandable, but this doesn’t explain the morality of the issue. Let’s say someone goes out and breaks a window. Although this act might be wrong and against the law, it does not explain morality but only that the act was wrong within itself. It does not necessarily have to be a law that can make an act morally right or wrong. Hunting is a prime example of this. Even though it is legal to hunt specific animals during the year, one might argue that killing these animals is morally wrong due to the fact that it is killing. Using laws as an example of the Divine Command Theory does not fully explain the question of whether something is moral or not, but simply that something might be wrong or right. More or less, this is how the Euthyphro Dilemma would be pertinent to the Divine Command Theory of Morality. The Divine Command Theory, as it seems, is also a strictly religious question as it pertains to Gods and not necessarily that acts that are performed by nonbelievers or Atheists. For believers, all acts and everything within this world was created by God or Gods, and are...

Words: 1265 - Pages: 6

Moral

...Moral Education Assignment Topics 2012 1. Social service activity Organize a charity visit to an orphanage home, rehab center, old folks home, animal shelter or any welfare home. Write a full report on your visit. You must include charity itinerary and share your experience. You may include pictures, interview scripts with the Principal or any document which is relevant. 2. Bribery The problem of bribery exist and there has been attempt to curb it since the Melaka Sultanate period. Why is bribery an important issue? Write a report on the causes of this unethical conduct and how such problem can be resolved in our country, Malaysia. 3. HIV /AIDS As we are aware of, until now there is no cure for HIV infections and AIDS patients have to face death. Write a report on AIDS and explain the importance of protecting and not discriminating HIV/AIDS patients in our society. 4. Internet Internet misuse may cause harm and pollutes the mental growth of teenagers. Conduct a simple research on the disadvantages of internet for example addiction to social networking websites and the effect of this to users. 5. Bully issues Bullying has taken place for centuries where the stronger abuse the weaker. Write a report on the importance of overcoming bullying in schools. You may support your report with examples. (From newspaper cuttings, magazines, journals etc) 6. Family Institution In western countries, sending aged parents to retirement...

Words: 688 - Pages: 3

Moral Isolationism

...In looking as an outsider on the ways of another culture it is the norm for many people to want to remove their own personal values from an analysis and instead take the position that we cannot judge a society that we do not exist within, as Midgely called “moral isolationism”. It is easy to understand this course of logic; as a foreigner entering into another culture, especially one where actions that we view as immoral exist on a commonplace level, it is only natural to take the stance of ‘who am I to judge’, or ‘when in Rome…’. How can you condemn an action that is a societal norm? But this then raises the issue of the looking glass turning the other direction; if we cannot judge another culture, can that culture judge us? By embarking down this path of moral relativism we head towards a destination that is inherently immoral because there are no absolutes but instead only situations and contexts in which things are moral and others where they are not. Many would argue that each society is entitled to their own opinions and to create their own values. These same people would instead argue that there are no universal truths. Ironically, this statement in itself is a paradox as what it espouses is a universal truth. By removing our capacity to judge others & other cultures we take the cowardly & easy way out, when the reality is there are universal truths and absolutes. How can one take the stance that something is absolutely and unconditionally immoral, but then later add...

Words: 397 - Pages: 2

Moral

... know how and use what method to teaching different student, they also understand what the student wan, some of them will treat student like a friend, so student will very interested in class or doing any classroom activities. For example, if the teacher treat their student like a friend, when student get any trouble in doing some homework or assignment, student will more bold to ask teacher, and can understand it more clear when teacher explain. The role of teachers is not just imparting knowledge content but also to develop student in solving problem, making decisions and adapting to dynamic of the environment. These all requires student to develop a higher order thinking skills. Thinking skills can mapped along a continuum which starts from knowledge level, then comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and ends evaluation level. By doing classroom projects, cases and exercise, student basically walked though the various level of thinking like reading to comprehend, analyze and evaluate the issue at hand until decision to solve problems are made. As students practice often on more complex problem cased learning, their thinking skills become more developed and enhance to reach higher order level. Last but not least, teacher can use some effectively strategy to teach their student, let the entire student more easy to achieve a good academic achievement. A research by Lazear (1994) showed that students learn best in the first part of a lesson. A useful action......

Words: 8071 - Pages: 33

What Does It Mean to Say That Romantic Love Is a Moral Issue Do You Agree

...It is not easy to act both generally and individually morally, when people are blinded by passion and flourish of romantic love. That is why someone calls romantic love is a moral issue. Morality differentiate actions into right and wrong, and right actions are constituted by permissible and obligatory (Halwani 2010, p.89). We should eschew wrong actions, however, can we summarise romantic love is morally prohibited? Sometimes love hurts people when love is selfish or attachment; while sometimes love also brings happiness and support from outside of us. Romantic love is beyond dualism, just like Halwani (2010, p.92) states ' romantic love is not a basic good...it is not morally suspect either.' Then, how romantic love connects with right actions? If romantic love is our obligation, morality is uncorrelated. Whereas if romantic love is permissible that people can choose may or may not to undertake it, morality would intervene in decision making. 'Romantic love is not under our command, which means it is not something we are able to do at will' (Halwani2010, p.90). Romantic love is accidental; people just can not control the time, the place and the person that they will fall in love with. As a result, we can conclude that romantic love is not obligatory. Therefore, romantic love is neither obligatory nor prohibited; the only probability of romantic love is to be permissible. This appears a question about whether people should undertake it in their lives. To answer the question...

Words: 1401 - Pages: 6

Issue

...Defined Contribution Plan- A defined contribution plan is a retirement plan that requires that an individual "account" be set up for each participant in the plan. It is called "defined contribution" because a participant can only contribute a fixed maximum amount to the plan each year. The contributions are not based on the expected retirement benefit, but rather on a percentage that is specified in the plan (401kpsp.com, 2012). Other Post-Retirement Benefits- These benefits that fall within this category are of the non-cash payment benefits available to employees, including dental, vision care, legal services, and tuition credits. These additional benefits, along with traditional pension benefits can be a large expenditure for companies offering these plans, especially if the plans are fully. The public can only agree with the huge pension problem. The public opinion are strongly left-winged on the debt and deficit issue. Based on “Public Opinion and the Deficit,” on a poll off one thousand people, 62% voted for a combination of major program to lower the age Some Americans should be cut and some not, such as the programs helping the corporate businesses, etc. These business already strive alone, this recession is just a bump on the road. The companies always have the best benefits, tax wise, thanks to the Bush era. The people, on the other hand, have always faced higher tax rates than the billionaires of America and don’t get anything back in the end. This is a...

Words: 407 - Pages: 2

Moral

...Moral absolutism is related to human rights and stands against social topics such as war, sexism, rape to be absolutely and undoubtly immoral, regardless of religious beliefs that may believe these practices are acceptable depending on a situation. In a nutshell, moral absolutism follows the belief that there are set universal principles that are distinctively moral or immoral no matter what. For example, females being paid less than men due to their gender can be considered acceptable in some societies; from a absolute point of view, individuals should be treated equally regardless of their gender, age and religion. Moral absolutism has been shaped by human rights. After all, every indivudal is human, therefore the laws of humanity and its nature should be treated fairly. Moral absolutism can be explained through several perspectives such as rule utilitarianism. Rule utilitarianism states that an action can be moral, just only if it leads to happiness for all individuals (Schefczyk, 2009, Chapter 5, para. 8) Rule utilitarianism relates to absolutism in the sense that the moral absolute principles which individuals abide by benefit them in terms of happiness. Universal absolute principles such as treating others the way you wish to be treated, can be shown through rule utilitarianism; by treating another individual the way you would like to be treated ultimately leads to greater happiness for all people. As a whole, moral absolutism along with rule utilitarianism creates a...

Words: 659 - Pages: 3

Issue

...Issue The airline industry is facing one of the most challenging environments in its history. A global economic slowdown, punctuated by the events of September 11th, has led to a decline in passenger traffic, continued yield reductions, decreased load factors, and burgeoning fleet, insurance and labor costs. As airlines grapple with how to deliver a consistent and distinctive customer experience while maintaining low operating costs, they have turned to the promise of CRM. Although operational and security issues became top of mind immediately after September 11th, CRM has gradually come back into focus as airlines recognize the importance of effective customer management in establishing long term competitive advantage. CRM’s promise is indeed compelling strengthened loyalty driving increased revenue, with lower acquisition costs and improved operational efficiency. For full-service airlines, CRM is an essential component of their corporate strategy, the means of differentiating themselves from competitors in the eyes of the customer. And although low cost carriers may be less reliant on CRM as a means of driving competitive differentiation, even they must invest in fundamental CRM technologies and processes to manage the customer efficiently over the course of the travel experience. Increasingly, airlines are recognizing that CRM is a long term investment, with the true benefits reaped through profitable lifelong customer relationships. Although many airlines understand...

Words: 3903 - Pages: 16

Moral Relativism vs Moral

...Moral relativism vs Moral absolutism Moral Relativism Moral relativism is the insight that there are no obvious ethical truths and that moral facts are only relative to a given individual. According to this theory what is morally good for one person or culture might be morally bad for another, and vice versa: there are no moral absolutes. Moral relativism holds that ethical truths are of this latter kind. According to moral relativism, ethical truths are subjective rather than objective. This means that whether lying is wrong, for example, can vary from person to person or from culture to culture. It may be that for some people, or in some cultures, it is wrong, but that for other people, or in other cultures it isn‘t. In one mild form, moral relativism can seem obvious. Of course different people have different moral obligations: I have a duty to pay my credit card bill; you do not. Each of us is in different circumstances, and those circumstances affect what we ought and ought not to do. Morality is therefore relative to circumstances. Moral truths are relative to people or groups of people. Moral relativism holds that two different people in identical circumstances can, for no other reason than that they are different people, have different obligations. This is a much stronger claim than that morality is relative to circumstances. Moral absolutism Moral absolutism is the ethical theory which believes that there are always absolute rules of which moral questions can be...

Words: 506 - Pages: 3

Moral Leadership

..., we will evaluate the evidence and information presented, and we will evaluate how well the concept was evaluated based on the evidence. The argument must receive a total rating score of ‘40’ in order to be minimally acceptable evidence. An argument that falls below a rating of ‘40’ on the Wheel of Critical Thinking has poor evidence. Table 5: Wheel of Critical Thinking Evaluation Elements of Thought Purpose Definition Evaluation Previously stated in the first section under the introduction. Rating 8 Your purpose is your goal, your objective, what you are trying to accomplish. We also use the term to include functions, motives, and intentions. Question at The question lays out the problem Issue or issue and guides our thinking. When the question is vague, our thinking will lack clarity and distinctness. Information Information includes the facts, data, evidence, or experiences we use to figure things out. It does not necessarily imply accuracy or correctness. Interpretation & Inferences are interpretations or Inference conclusions you come to. Inferring is what the mind does in figuring something out. Concepts Concepts are ideas, theories, laws, principles, or hypotheses we use in thinking to make sense of things. Assumptions Assumptions are beliefs you take for granted. They usually operate at the subconscious or unconscious level of thought. We specifically asked this question and identified our purpose in our introduction: Is moral leadership matters...

Words: 4351 - Pages: 18

What Is the Ethical Issue or Problem? Identify the Issue Succinctly. | |Moral Agent Is a Corrections Officer with the Ethical Dilemma of a Recommendation for the Husband Who Is Convicted of a 3rd Offense| |of Dui and a

...University of Phoenix Material Ethical Worksheet Sample Incident Review |What is the ethical issue or problem? Identify the issue succinctly. | |The moral agent is a criminal defense attorney. The attorney knows of another criminal defense attorney who is an alcoholic and | |ignores his client obligations. What should the moral agent do? | |What are the most important facts? Which facts have the most bearing on the ethical decision presented? Include any important | |potential economic, social, or political pressures, and exclude inconsequential facts. | |The attorney often appears in court intoxicated. He ignores his cases and does not file appropriate motions before deadlines | |expire. His clients, who are court-appointed, usually end up with convictions and heavy sentences due to his incompetence. In | |trial, he is unprepared and unprofessional. Defendants have complained. Defense attorneys, prosecutors, and judges are aware of his| |incompetence and have done nothing. The attorney’s disbarment would likely cause drastic economic consequences for the attorney. If| |the moral agent is responsible for his disbarment, the moral agent may face the social stigma and pressure of being labeled a | |snitch. With emphasis on stiffer penalties for defendants, there is...

Words: 1433 - Pages: 6

Moral Issue

... The Case of ‘Made in The U.S.A.- Dumped in Brazil, Africa, Iraq…’ brings up the controversial issues of dumping, a term that refers to the practice of exporting to other countries products that have been banded or declared hazardous in the United States.Is it moral to dump U.S. banned products overseas? Both the manufactures and the consumers have valid arguments. As a consumer of these dangerous products being dumped on overseas markets one could argue the manufacturers lack of respect for life. It should be in the company’s best interest to take in consideration the health and safety of people and animals. These manufactures are knowingly making dangerous and even deadly products available to communities in third world countries. DowElanco sold its weed killer Galant in Costa Rica, although the Environmental Protection Agency forbade its sale to U.S. farmers because Galant may cause cancer. These companies need to take in consideration the burden/ benefit factor; the safety of others should be more important than the profit losses. It is clear that these manufacturers are not interested in the sustainability of our own bioregion. While dangerous pesticides are banned from the U.S. for containing deadly poison dioxin, the active ingredient in Agent Orange, these pesticides are routinely used in agriculture overseas.These toxic products are making their way back into the U.S. market trough the exporting of produce from Mexico to the United States. Most of the time the...

Words: 549 - Pages: 3

Moral Hazard

...Introduction Moral hazard arises when an entity protected from risk may behave differently than they would bear all the consequences of risk. Moral hazard increases because individual people and institutions do not assume the consequences of their actions and, therefore, tend to behave less careful than would be the case bear the full consequences. An example is the behavior of the driver of the car, which in the absence of insurance is driving more carefully and ensure that the car is parked in a safe place and, above all, remember to lock the car. A special case of moral hazard is the principal-agent issue, which concerns the relationship between the party ordering the actions (the principal) and the party that is actively executing an agreement (the agent). To perform the contract, the principal entrusts control of your property agent but does not control his behavior fully. This raises the asymmetry of information and the possibility of conflict if the agent will act in their interests, using the resources of principal. The most common example is an employer-employee relationship or owner-management company. In some corporations dispersed owners or shareholders are not able to effectively monitor management actions because managers face the temptation to strive for rapid improvements in business performance and payment of wages at the expense of their development in future years Olympus Case Olympus story begins with the common problems we face the Japanese...

Words: 871 - Pages: 4

Moral Rights

...ASSIGNMENT 04 C06I Business Ethics Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double-spaced pages; refer to the "Assignment Format" page located on the Course Home page for specific format requirements. Respond to the items below. 1. Define the following: a right, a legal right, a moral right, a human right. How are they related? . Rights are legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement; that is, rights are the fundamental normativerules about what is allowed of people or owed to people, according to some legal system, social convention, or ethical theory.[1] Rights are of essential importance in such disciplines as law and ethics, especially theories of justice anddeontology. Rights are often considered fundamental to civilization, being regarded as established pillars of society and culture,[2]and the history of social conflicts can be found in the history of each right and its development. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "rights structure the form of governments, the content of laws, and the shape ofmorality as it is currently perceived Each legal right that an individual possesses relates to a corresponding legal duty imposed on another. For example, when aperson...

Words: 672 - Pages: 3

Ethical and Moral Issue in Business

...Ethical and Moral Issues in Business MGT/216 Ethical and Moral Issues in Business The purpose of this paper is to explain the difference between ethical issues and moral issues. Ethics are standards of behavior, which depending on a person’s profession must be adhered to such as legal, medical, or the workplace. Ethics dictate what socially acceptable behavior within a social system is and sets the standards for what is right and wrong. Examples of ethical issues are discrimination, sexual harassment, and conflicts of interest. Morals refer to the understanding of what is right and wrong as well as what is just and fair and the actions taken. Morals define a person’s character and conform to social beliefs. Moral issues are one’s actions on those set standards. One may know that morally something is wrong but are considered to be ethical if one keeps their word or promise made. On the other hand one may morally feel so strongly on an issue that the ethical code of their profession is set aside and is violated. The difference between personal ethics and professional ethics are the actions one may take in response to different situations. Personal ethics are the set of ethics that an individual personally believes in and holds true. Professional ethics are rules, laws, or codes that professionally must be adhered to. Sometimes personal and professional ethics can conflict with each other forcing individuals to choose between...

Words: 605 - Pages: 3