Premium Essay

Mosley V. Okeedokee: Weight, Inc. Case Study

Submitted By
Words 519
Pages 3
The legal office of Tyson, Edison & Vogue, the Brockton Liberty Building, 501 West Tenth Street, Starville, Brockton 00012-4532, Mr. Theodore Tyson, Esq., has been appointed to represent Lauren and James Mosley, the plaintiffs in the Mosley v. OkeeDokee–Weight, Inc. case.
After reviewing the case the law offices of Tyson, Edison, & Vogue believe the jury’s verdict for the award of $200,000 based on the evidence of other people who took the natural dietary supplement was an appropriate decision based on the laws, statutes and opinions taken from experts. Even though, the defendant believes that the judge’s ruling allowing the evidence of other people who have suffered injuries as the result of taking the natural dietary supplement was an error of law. …show more content…
Under § 2307.76 the manufacture is liable for compensatory damages due to the inadequate warning or instructions on the label. In addition, §2307.74 the product “Zap Fat” gave no warnings when it left control of its manufacture that it can cause server side effects to its intended users and possibly death.
Furthermore the evidence that was provided supports the liability of the supplier under the provisions of § 2307.77, (1) The supplier in question was negligent and that, a negligence was a proximate cause of harm for which the claimant seeks to recover compensatory damages.
The evidence is overwhelming; no ware on the label on the Zap Fat bottle does it mention that the use of this dietary supplement causes heart valve problems that you may die

Similar Documents