Premium Essay

Muted Group Theory Cheris Kramarae

Submitted By
Words 219
Pages 1
Out of all five theories, I favor critical theories like the Muted Group Theory because Cheris Kramarae exposes how “ The language of a particular culture does not serve all its speakers equally…”(457). As an African American woman, I am often muted and when I decide to express myself and use my voice to protest racial inequality by creating changes in a positive direction, I am labeled as aggressive or angry. Furthermore, I connect with Kramarae’s statement, “men’s dominant power position in society limits women’s access to communication in public spaces” (458). For example, in some religious denominations, women are not allowed to speak in the pulpit.
Because I have first-hand experiences as a muted-group population, I celebrate the goal

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

An Example Of Muted Group Theory In The Help Movie

...Muted group is defined as “People belonging to low-power groups who must change their language when communicating publicly, thus, their ideas are often overlooked; e.g., women” (Kramarae, Cheris, 461). Kramarae say because women are often a muted group in the public sphere, they’ve developed back-channel routes to openly share their experiences with other women. According to Oregon State University, “Muted Group Theory is a critical theory because it is concerned with power and how it is used against people. While critical theories can separate the powerful and the powerless any number of ways, this theory chooses to bifurcate the power spectrum into men and women.” Women are the people with little power who have trouble giving the voice to their perceptions because they must re-encode their thoughts to make them understand in the public sphere. Men and Women perform different tasks in society. The movie that can relate to muted theory is ‘The Help.” Men dominated the political sphere, and women dominated at...

Words: 902 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Genders

...Theories of Gender Communication Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Kramarae, C. (1981). Women and men speaking. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand. New York: Ballantine. Genderlect Theory – Deborah Tannen Tannen believes that the best way to describe communication between the genders is in a cross-cultural format. Women use rapport talk to establish meaningful connection with others, while men use report talk to gain status in relation to others. Because women and men use language differently, Tannen suggests they are speaking different dialects, or genderlects. The goal of genderlect theory is to acknowledge and appreciate the language of the opposite sex and achieve mutual respect and understanding. (Semiotic and socio-cultural traditions) Genderlect theory is evaluated on the back of this page. |Tenet |Clarification | | | | |Why We Communicate: Women seek connection, men seek status. |Women engage in communication to build and maintain relationships with | | |others. By contrast, men are...

Words: 758 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Will Do Next Time

...Instructor’s Manual and Test Bank to accompany A First Look at Communication Theory Sixth Edition Em Griffin Wheaton College prepared by Glen McClish San Diego State University and Emily J. Langan Wheaton College Published by McGraw­Hill, an imprint of The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Copyright Ó 2006,  2003, 2000, 1997, 1994, 1991 by The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The contents, or parts thereof, may be reproduced in print form  solely for classroom use with A First Look At Communication Theory provided such reproductions bear copyright notice, but may not be reproduced in  any other form or for any other purpose without the prior written consent of The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, in any  network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning. PREFACE Rationale We agreed to produce the instructor’s manual for the sixth edition of A First Look at Communication Theory because it’s a first-rate book and because we enjoy talking and writing about pedagogy. Yet when we recall the discussions we’ve had with colleagues about instructor’s manuals over the years, two unnerving comments stick with us: “I don’t find them much help”; and (even worse) “I never look at them.” And, if the truth be told, we were often the people making such points! With these statements in mind, we have done some serious soul-searching about the texts that so many teachers—ourselves...

Words: 159106 - Pages: 637