Premium Essay

Natural Justice

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Aleks
Words 2989
Pages 12
Principles of Natural Justice

Assignment Topic On Business Law Presented By Alexander T C , IInd Semester MBA Evening Batch 2010-2012

Assignment on Business Laws

- Principles of Natural Justice
Presented By Alexander T C MBA 2nd Semester IMK –UoK

1. Introduction :-

Why Application of Principles of Natural Justice in Managerial Decisions is important? Most Managerial decisions that affect individuals and organisations are made by primary decision makers i.e. front-line administrators and managers. Only a minority of these decisions are reviewed by internal review officers, ombudsmen, courts or tribunals. The quality of administrative justice experienced by the public depends largely on primary decision makers ‘getting it right’. Central to good decision making is decision makers’ understanding of the legal and administrative framework in which decisions should be made. In turn, this depends on whether primary decision makers have adequate knowledge of that framework. While taking a decision a manager has to have the following in his mind to have his decision justified.  Procedural Fairness  Lawfulness  Evidence, Facts And Findings  Reasons  Accountability

2. Definition:Justice is of two types namely Legal Justice and Natural Justice. Legal justice refers to justice governed by the law of the state and natural Justice refers to moral justice and is governed by the Laws of Equity. Justice done to one seems not injustice to another. So the goodness of a law is in maximizing the pleasure of the beneficiaries with minimized pain to the others. According to Aristotle, law inspired by reason is the natural law and when ever the general preposition of legal law is found to work hardship to a particular case, equity must be applied to mitigate (make less severe or painful) and rectify the harshness. It’s the natural law that provides the frame work of…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Natural Justice

...Contents Concept of Natural Justice ................................................................................................... 1 Definition ......................................................................................................................... 1 History of the growth of Natural Justice .......................................................................... 2 Two Rules of Natural Justice .............................................................................................. 3 Right to a Fair Hearing ..................................................................................................... 3 At a Glance ................................................................................................................... 3 Scope of Fair Hearing ................................................................................................... 5 Aspects of a fair hearing ............................................................................................... 6 Rule Against Bias ........................................................................................................... 12 At a Glance ................................................................................................................. 12 Scope of the Rule against Bias ................................................................................... 12 Forms of bias .........................................................................................

Words: 8851 - Pages: 36

Free Essay

Natural Justice

...Lord Bridge identified that “the so -called rules of natural justice are not set in stone...”[1] This highlights the uncertainty surrounding this area of law and understandably how the principles attached to it 'are in some confusion[2] due to the substantial changes over time. The initial separation between judicial and administrative cases proved problematic as it came with the notion of not providing executive-related cases a rigorous decision-making procedure unless they were solely of a judicial nature.[3] The enablement of all case types to be granted a court-like procedure wouldn't be very efficient, bearing in mind the amount of time and money that it’ll cost. The concept of filtering judicial from executive cases may have been beneficial but it raised issues that needed addressing, such as how justice would be served for those whose cases fall under the administrative sector. Professor D J Galligan stated that, “whenever the state, through its officials, decides how people are to be treated, considerations of fair treatment arise…”[4] It’s the tension between administrative autonomy and legal certainty which has now shaped the concept of natural justice[5], by incorporating procedural fairness into governmental law as a means of balancing these competing issues. The Latin maxims 'Audi Alterem Partem' [6] and 'Nemo Iudex sua Causa’ [7] form the two distinct parts of natural justice. The main issue in Popeye's case is the revocation of his license by the Harbour......

Words: 3227 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Principles of Natural Justice

...Delhi Bar Council takes suo motu action against advocate AP Singh for "professional misconduct" Pallavi Saluja On September 17, 2013 - 6:51pm 7 The Bar Council of Delhi today issued a show cause notice to defence lawyer AP Singh for making unwarranted statements outside the court premises after the sentencing of his clients, convicts in the December 16 gang rape case. Singh had defended accused Akshay Thakur and Vinay Sharma in the recently concluded Delhi gang rape trial. Speaking to Bar & Bench, the Delhi Bar Council’s Chairman, Surya Prakash Khatry said, “We have issued a show cause notice to AP Singh. We have taken a suo motu action against him for his “professional conduct”. We have gone through the newspapers and various clippings capturing his remarks. The Bar Council has unanimously decided to issue notice. Out of 25 members, about 19 members were present at the meeting today”. Singh has to now either appear before the Council or file his reply by October 11 this year. Singh is in trouble for his remarks to media persons that he would burn his daughter alive if she has premarital sex or moves around at night with her boyfriend. However, Singh later told media that he had made the remarks under pressure from an individual, whom he described as an “anti-social element.”  The Bar Council Secretary Murari Tiwari told Bar & Bench that they had received several oral complaints from various NGOs and other groups condemning the statement made by Singh after...

Words: 261 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Cpc Is Aimed so That a Litigant Should Get a Fair Trial in Accordance with the Accepted Principles of Natural Justice.

...of natural justice.” INTRODUCTION Before the project topic is introduced, the researcher would like to write about what exactly is the principle at the very core of this topic: the principles of natural justice. It evolved from common law and sets to show a set of procedural principles which ever judicial and administrative body must follow whenever it taken a decision affecting the rights of any particular individual. It essentially follows the two most basic principles. The first one being the principle of nemo judex in causa sua, which is the rule against bias; and the other being audi alteram partem, which is the rule of fair trial. This right to a fair hearing has also been put up in Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 6(1) of the European Convention of Human Rights, showing how important the principles of natural justice are all over the world. Article 14 of the Indian Constitution is at the core of how natural justice functions in India. The fact that every person is guaranteed equality amongst all citizens shows how the very basis of all decisions in the country is based on the pillars of natural justice. All procedural laws of the State follow these principles and as we have seen over time, the judiciary has been very harsh on acts which deny a person his rights. The Civil Procedure Code is what defines all procedural laws in the realm of civil law in the country and strictly follows these mentioned principles of natural justice,......

Words: 1162 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Outline the Main Ways by Which Offending by Children and Young People May Be Prevented. Explain Any Conflicts You Feel May Exist with the Principles of Human Rights and Natural Justice.

...Outline The Main Ways By Which Offending By Children And Young People May Be Prevented. Explain Any Conflicts You Feel May Exist With The Principles Of Human Rights And Natural Justice. The aim of the question stated is to discuss how the New Labour Government has responded in terms of preventing children and young people from engaging in criminal behaviour and entering the youth justice system. In order to answer this statement the essay shall explore the various legislations implemented in an attempt to prevent youth criminality, discussing any conflicts that exist with the principles of Human Rights and Natural Justice. In Britain there are two types of Law, firstly Statutory Law, which are Acts of Law passed by the Parliament. Whereby the Parliament must check its consistency with the 1998 Human Rights Act (the HRA). The HRA ‘introduced European Convention on Human Rights into English Law’ (Crawford & Newburn; 2003: p16). The UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice include: ‘The best interests of the child are paramount; judicial proceedings should be avoided where possible; any intervention should be kept minimum; police, prosecution or other agencies should be able to dispose of cases at their discretion; criminalizing and penalising young people should be avoided unless there is serious damage or harm to others; legal assistance should be prompt and free of charge’ (Crawford & Newburn; 2003: p16). The second type is Common......

Words: 3369 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Aristotle's Teaching on Natural Law

...Give an account of Aristotle’s teaching about Natural law Aristotle was the first practitioner to contribute to the creation of Natural Law as inspired by his mentor Plato he developed the relationship between Natural and conventional justice and outlined the use of Natural inclinations in Natural law. In this essay I will outline Aristotle’s contribution to Natural law. Aristotle’s works, Nicomanchean Ethics and The Politics illustrate the close between legal and political philosophy. In Nicomanchean Ethics, Aristotle argued that law supports a virtuous existence, advances the lives of individuals and promotes the ‘perfect community’. He proposed people should employ practical wisdom or active reason in order to behave in a way that is consistent with a virtuous existence. Aristotle defined justice as ‘a state of mind that encourages men to perform just actions, ‘just’ meaning ‘lawful’, ‘fair’ and ‘virtuous’. In theory, then, there exists a universal standard of natural justice which is unchangeable, but in practice there must always be a mix of natural justice and legal justice in the laws of the city. Therefore while the principles of natural justice don't change, natural justice in action varies because in applying natural justice conventional justice needs to be added. Aristotle divided ‘political’ justice into ‘natural’ and ‘conventional’ justice. According to Aristotle, the content of ‘natural’ justice (or ‘universal’ law) is set by nature, which renders it......

Words: 473 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Cj Ethics

...Elemental personal values Constitution This is the most ranked elemental personal value because is supersedes all the rest in the Criminal Justice System (CJS). The constitution is significant because it contains the potential guidelines that recognize all citizens are equal. All citizens are unique and they should not be sidelined or neglected because of unwarranted reasons (Bresler, 2015). Therefore, the constitution plays the imperative role of ensuring that all citizens are treated equally and this brings the sense of belonging and nationality to the populace. In the quest to attain relevant knowledge and expertise on criminal justice, it has emerged that the constitution is supreme in outlining how to treat the populace in regard to embracing human dignity, attainment of equality, and human right promotion (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2014). The constitution also outlines how the rule of law is to be observed and how to provide impartial justice to all irrespective of variations in sexual orientation, religion or political affiliation. Therefore, the constitution surpasses all the other elemental personal values because it is the most significant element of justice. It could be quite challenging to provide justice in any given country without ascribing to the country’s constitution. From a personal perspective, I have come to learn that the constitution unites the entire country and provides guidelines about how citizens have to behave while within the......

Words: 627 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Law and Social Change

...economic, and societal worlds, it is regularly involved while pursuing social change. Social change is defined as the modifications in the manner in which individuals work, educate and oversee their children, raise their family, and search for life’s meaning.[3] In my opinion I agree to this statement that in considering the various applications and principles of justice, it can be said that the law, at its best, operates as an agent of change and, at its worst, serves as an instrument of coercion by social elites in society. For several decades, the society and law philosophers have strived hard with the aim of explicating the association between law and social change. The attempts have been made in the milieu of developing legal institutions. In this case, law is perceived as a dependent and independent variable influencing a society. The mutual dependence of law and social systems in a society are also stressed by philosophers. Individuals’ moral attitudes as well as their sense of justice play a vital role in determining the law.[4] In this case, “sense of justice” refers to the knowledge of the level of justice linked to the nature of resources in different social circumstances.[5] Satisfaction and dissatisfaction are exhibited depending with whether individuals obtain what they deserve in a just manner. The existing social norms in a society should be considered in order to attain optimum results. Law acts as a medium through which planned social evolution is......

Words: 1388 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Industrial Relations and Labour Welfare

...Origin of the Concept of the Natural Justice Roman jurists expressed rules and principles for conduct of man – Jus Naturale Use interchangeability with divine law. Even Adam called upon to explain why the forbidden fruit was eaten. Principles of Natural Justice (i) Rule of fair hearing for Audi Alteram Partem – A person must be given an opportunity to defend himself. Nobody should be condemned unheard. Constitutional base under Article-311 Case Law R.K.Vasistha vs UoI – Receipt of Documents {1993 SCC (L&S) 153} Joseph Vilangandan vs Executive Engineer {1968 (3 SCC) 36} Errington vs Ministry of Health – Order for demolition of buildings P.K.Sharma vs UoI – Mandatory to give copy of enquiry {1988 (6 ATC) 904} Mohd. Ramzan Case {1990 SCC (L&S) 612} ECIL Case {1993 (4 SCC) 727} (ii) Rule against Bias No person should be a judge in his own cause. Meaning of bias – It means operative prejudice whether conscious or unconscious in relation to a party or an issue. Types of Bias a. Personal bias b. Pecuniary bias c. Departmental bias d. Test of bias e. The real question is not whether a person was biased f. The test is not what actually happened but the substantial possibilities for the real likelihood of bias Justice must be rooted in confidence Case Law Chanda Case G.Nageshwara Rao vs APS RTC {1959 SC 1376} Justice should not only be done but appear to be done Maneklal vs Premchand {202 (9 SCC) 732} Demonstration in...

Words: 1182 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The Lottery

...Justice is the corner stone of any human civilization, across all nations, all languages, all historical development, all cultural background, and all social groups. Even though human exercises of justice always involve subjective judgment, most people believe that there would be ultimate objective justice in this world. In fact, in any human society, people always ascribe the absoluteness of justice which is free of subjective relativity to divine authority, even if the society is dominated by atheist materialist culture. This is because mankind could only acquire absolute authority from supernatural or divine power superior to all human power. As a result, divine justice has been the foundation of all human justice in this world. Besides the divine justice, there are another two general categories of justice: natural justice and social justice. By natural justice I am referring to the application of natural logic or knowledge when exercising justice. For example, we all know that forcing people to work under dangerous environment or poor conditions could be harmful to them, or cutting a person with knife could kill him. This kind of common knowledge could be accepted among people without any modern scientific education when making judgment about justice. The last major category of justice is the social justice, i.e. the exercise of justice based on various cultural values, human experiences and personal interests. In reality, the process of exercising justice would......

Words: 865 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Justice, Equality, and Rights

...1 JUSTICE, EQUALITY, AND RIGHTS by John Tasioulas For R. Crisp (ed), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics 1. The Nature of Justice Philosophers have advocated many divergent views as to the content of the correct principles of justice. In contemporary philosophy, for example, the live options range from the austere libertarian thesis that the claims of justice are limited to a small class of rights that protect us from coercive interference by others to more radically egalitarian doctrines that mandate the large-scale redistribution of wealth and other goods. But there is a prior, conceptual question: is there an illuminating sense in which these disagreements are aptly described as concerned with justice? Alternatively put, is there a concept of justice of which these rival accounts can be interpreted as offering different conceptions? (Rawls 1971/1999: 5-6). If not, the dispiriting conclusion looms that these disputes are „verbal‟ rather than genuine, like a debate about the nature of „banks‟ in which one party has in mind financial institutions and the other party the sloping bits of land at the sides of rivers. One answer is that the concept of justice marks out the entire domain of moral evaluation, or at least the whole of inter-personal morality, excluding only moral concerns relating purely to oneself or to non-persons, such as animals. This expansive reading of justice – as (inter-personal) moral rightness or virtue – has a venerable pedigree. The......

Words: 13621 - Pages: 55

Free Essay

Natural Law

...INTRODUCTION Natural Law Is a philosophy of law that is determined by nature, and so is unive rsal. Classically, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature both social and personal and deduce binding rules of moral behavior from it. Natural law is often contrasted with the positive law of a given political community, society, or state. In legal theory, on the other hand, the interpretation of positive law requires some reference to natural law Although natural law is often conflated with common law, the two are distinct in that natural law is a view that certain rights or values are inherent in or universally cognizable by virtue of human reason or human nature, while common law is the legal tradition whereby certain rights or values are legally cognizable by virtue of judicial recognition or articulation PROPONENTS OF NATURAL LAW Plato According to Plato we live in an orderly universe. At the basis of this orderly universe or nature are the forms, most fundamentally the Form of the Good, which Plato describes as "the brightest region of Being". The Form of the Good is the cause of all things and when it is seen it leads a person to act wisely. In the Symposium, the Good is closely identified with the Beautiful. Also in the Symposium, Plato describes how the experience of the Beautiful by Socrates enables him to resist the temptations of wealth and sex. In the Republic, the ideal community is, "...a city which would be established in accordance......

Words: 1931 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Why Does Mills Think That Utilitarianism Provides the Foundation for Justice and Why Does Rawls Reject It?

...think that Utilitarianism provides the foundation for Justice and why does Rawls reject it? Introduction The concept of utilitarianism is one that has engulfed the philosophical arena with an obscene number of arguments that support and/or criticize it. Generally, utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics that defines an action as one that ensures maximum utility. Other schools of thought would like to put it as the concept of “maximizing happiness while reducing suffering” (Mills 3).In as much as utilitarianism has continued to receive applause from people and the political scene, other divergent scholars has come up with other theories that seek to compromise the philosophies under which the concept of utilitarianism operates. As a result, utilitarianism has become subject to contradictions from other theories in the field of ethics. The thinking class in other fields of utilitarianism characterizes in as a quantitative yet reductionist approach to ethics (Mills 3). Over time, the concept of utilitarianism has received ideological threats from; deontological ethics which does not assign moral worth to an action based on its consequences, virtue ethics that solely deals with action and habits that results to happiness, pragmatic ethics and other forms of ethics that backs the idea of consequentialism. In a nut shell, the concept of utilitarianism as defined by political philosophers and in relation to justice is becoming a “battlefield” where the philosophical......

Words: 3508 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

Law and Justice

...Law and Justice THEORIES OF JUSTICE Plato In Plato’s major work, The Republic, he used Socrates as a mouth piece to develop his on view of justice. Socrates outlines his, i.e Plato’s view of justice both for the individual and for society. Dealing with the man first; a man’s soul has 3 elements: 1. Reason 2. Spirt 3. Appetite or desire A man is just when each of these three elements fulfils its appropriate function and there is a harmonious relationship between them. Within society there are three groups society is just hen each class fulfils its appropriate function and there is a harmonious relationship between them. Therefore Plato viewed justice as harmony between the warring elements. Distributive Justice This is concerned with fairly shaking the benefits such as money, property, family, takes and civic duties of life within an organisation. Aristotle Aristotle stressed the need for proportionality and achieving the middle ay and a proper balance between extremes. He said a ‘just state’ ill distribute its wealth on the basis of worth (merit) therefore giving to each according to their virtue and contribution to society. He stated there was a need for corrective justice to ensure that individuals can keep what they are entitled to. The role of the court is making sure the offender does not benefit from his crime ad victim does not suffer loss. In this sense, the balance or ‘middle way’ is achieved. Thomas Aquinas Illustrated his view......

Words: 1497 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

College

...self-preservation was everyone's fundamental natural instinct. He believed it was essential to ground political philosophy on this basic principle. | Hobbes distinguished the law of nature (the rules that tell us how to preserve ourselves) from the right of nature - our freedom to do anything (including killing and eating others) that seems necessary to this end. Hobbes' definition of the law of nature was very different from that used by traditional natural law theorists. They saw natural law as the basic moral precepts that every civilized nation acknowledged. Many equated Natural Law with the Ten Commandments. Self preservation will decrease the interest to search for peace. Natural law command is suppose to be designed to search for peace and personal security. | | | Glaucon believes that justice is good solely as means but not in itself. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove to him how it can be good both as means and in itself. Glaucon says that no one is willingly just, but rather compelled to act justly caused by nature, while they try to better themselves, ultimately saying that the life of the unjust is also better. Glaucon’s argument contains three parts; justice being good in itself, purely as means, the third dealing with its goodness for both reasons. Glaucon says that justice is a mean between doing what is best; which is doing injustice without paying the penalty and suffering injustice without being able to avenge oneself. Therefore, justice is not cared......

Words: 660 - Pages: 3