Premium Essay

Negligence Mishap

In: Social Issues

Submitted By candlelover
Words 1365
Pages 6
Negligence Mishap
A health care provider has a responsibility to provide safe and competent care to his or her patient. When a patient’s care is compromised, is not satisfied with his or her care, or does not have a successful outcome the legal system becomes involved because of today’s litigious society. Health care providers see lawsuits wrongfully filled, not valid, and some unjustly settled as seen in history of some cases settled, which society was just going for the money settlement. Yet there are some cases in which a lawsuit should be filled but is not because of unaware and uneducated of his or her options. This is why it is important to be aware of the terms negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice as well as fear of experiencing involvement in any situation containing these terms as a health care provider.
As health care providers it is important to be aware of these terms as well as the laws and policies that guide each healthcare practices. This purpose of this paper is to provide the differences between legal terms gross negligence, negligence, and malpractice as well as provide a rationale for this mishap and the importance of documentation. This paper will also briefly describe ethical principles, which would guide his or her practice and how to document the case to satisfy ethical and legal requirements. Legal Terms
Standards of care are generated by institutions, state, and federal agencies to help guide healthcare professional in his or her field. These standards provide and define the minimal acceptable requirements of skills and knowledge for patient care. When a healthcare provider fails to provide competent care to his or her patient, they may be found guilty of negligence, gross negligence, or malpractice (Guido, 2010). Three main elements have to be proven in a case to be valid and these elements are; duty of care, breach in...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Negletct Paper

...Negligence Paper Maria Gutierrez HCS/478 August 5, 2015 Carol Mack Negligence Paper The health provider or a nurse has the responsibility to provide the best care possible for the patients. In this paper, I will discuss about neglect and the different between negligence, gross negligence and malpractice. I will also cover my opinion about the situation, agreement or disagreement deciding whether it was a mishap or negligence, the importance of documentation, the ethical principles that serve as a guide for nursing. Negligence is not being diligent. It is one of the legal issues that all healthcare provider are prone to participate unintentionally. Guido (2010 stated, “Negligence denotes conduct lacking in due care. Negligence include doing something that the reasonable and prudent person would not do” (p. 92). Negligence can occur anytime and in any areas of the healthcare environment. However, negligence most likely happens with old people in health care setting, for example, nursing home, hospitals and boarding care facilities. Some of the common negligence examples include failure to provide adequate nutrition, medication error, physical injury, and failure to turn patient that lead to a poor skin integrity. Gross negligence is more serious than negligence. The difference between the two of them is the degree of carelessness or inattention. Negligence is when a person fails with the standard of care not intentionally and gross negligence is a complete reckless......

Words: 1318 - Pages: 6

Free Essay


...Negligence Latasha Adegboruwa University of Phoenix Health Law and ethics HCS/478 Lynda White April 18, 2011 Negligence “Registered nurses have more professional accountability than at any other time in the history of nursing. As a result, nurses must confront the fact that they now owe a higher duty of care to their patients, and by extension, are more exposed to civil claims for negligence than ever before”(Weld and Bibb, 2009, p 2). “Negligence is described as failure to use such care as a reasonable prudent and careful person would use under similar circumstances” (Weld and Bibb, 2009, p3). Common examples of negligence are malnutrition, inadequate hydration, physical injury was done, and it was the result of the nurse’s care or lack thereof. There are five main elements in a nursing negligence case and all five elements have to be proven for a case to be valid 1. The nurse had a duty to perform. 2. The appropriate care was not apparent in the situation. 3. There was a breach of violation of care 3. There was injury proven to result from the nurse’s negligence and 5. There is proof that damages occurred as a direct result of the situation. (Avery, 2009). Gross negligence is a more serious form of negligence and goes further than carelessness. While regular negligence is seen as a person falling below the standard of care, gross negligence is seen as complete failure to show care and in fact implies recklessness or a willful disregard for the......

Words: 1167 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Business Law

...BUSINESS LAW A) Jane, a youth worker, confiscates a flick knife from a member of her youth club and gives it to her supervisor. B) Tony, an antique dealer, displays an old military knife with a spring opening device in his shop window with a price ticket attached to it. C) Fola buys an unopened box of kitchen utensils from a car boot sale. Without examining the contents closely she donates the box to a charity shop. The box is found to contain a flick knife. Any individual, who produces, offers or contracts or offers available to be purchased or contract, or uncovered or has in his ownership with the end goal of offer or employ or gives or provides for another individual (an) Any blade which has a cutting edge which opens naturally by hand weight connected to a catch, spring or other gadget in or joined to the handle of the blade, off and on again known as a "flick knife" or "flick blade"; or (b) Any blade which has a sharpened steel which is discharged from the handle or sheath thereof by the power of gravity or the application of diffusive energy and which, when discharged, is secured by method for a catch, spring, lever, or other gadget, now and then known as a "gravity blade", should be blameworthy of an offense and might be obligated on rundown conviction on account of a first offense to detainment for a term not surpassing three months or to a fine not surpassing fifty pounds or to both such detainment and fine, and on account of a second or......

Words: 1557 - Pages: 7

Free Essay


...the three mini clips presented, one thing is surely important - our safety. Proper procedures and guidelines must be strictly followed by all crews on board. All members including the officers must have enough knowledge on how to use all electrical materials and gadgets on ship and they must apply it at all times. As seen on the movie, negligence and carelessness results damage to property and people on board. Accidents always happen when lack of concern and disobedience rules them. Therefore, everyone’s life becomes at risk. Small things which should not be a cause of trouble turn out to be a big mess and worst it sometimes leads to death. One specific example is from the clip showing the importance of electrical safety. Instead of testing all the electrical equipment first and wearing protective gloves and goggles, the character in the movie just plug it directly which results to his sudden death. In the movie Seven Sailors, it shows how carelessness affects the whole ship operation. Instead of taking it as a minor damage, it becomes larger to the extent which they never expected. For the last clip, Just Another Mishap, it emphasizes negligence on hospital ship. Proper medical ethics must be strictly followed even on board because lives of all officers and crews are at stake here. In the end, the movies only show how important for us to follow proper procedures no matter how simple the task may seem. Accidents always happen but can be controlled so long as we know how to......

Words: 284 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay


...HSA515 February/1/2011 Healthcare Policy Law and ethics Abstract The Snow Storm Lawsuit is a case of Negligence, Duty to act, and wrongful death. This paper will explain the legal, ethical and professional considerations. The Chief Executive Officer of a small non-profit community hospital were on vacation in the Bahamas, the are was hit by a large snow storm, in this case, many of the hospitals health care providers were unable to make it to work, as a result. This paper will explain how the employees reacted, and how the patients ethically, legally and professional suffered from the unexpected incident. While the Chief Executive officer of a small non-profit community hospital was vacationing in the Bahamas, the area was hit by a large snow storm. Many of the hospitals health care providers were unable to make it in to work, 3-11 and 11-7 shifts. As a result the patients units were understaffed and days shift personnel were required to remain on duty until relieved. During this snow storm, several patients sustained minor injuries from falls out of their bed, and one patient died after being given the wrong medication, the nurse on duty also left the hospital to go to Wendy’s to buy dinner, after one year, the families of these patients sued the hospital on the behalf of their deceased relatives. The three legal considerations are, during the snow storm, many of the hospital health care providers were unable to make...

Words: 1140 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Pdf Document

...4 Negligence: duty of care Learning objectives At the end of this chapter you should be able to: • have an overview of the history of negligence; • describe the function of duty of care in negligence; • appreciate the way duty of care has been defined and developed; and • apply the principles of duty of care in the areas of omissions and liability of public bodies. 04-Bermin-Chap04.indd 42 2/6/2008 7:39:32 PM 4.1 Introduction Negligence began to be recognised as a tort in its own right around the beginning of the nineteenth century. Before that time, the dominating action for personal injury was the writ of trespass. Trespass was initially concerned only with direct acts, however, during the nineteenth century the focus shifted to the distinction between intentional wrongs (trespass) and the unintentional (negligence). As we have seen, negligence was originally described in terms of a duty imposed by law and thus it will be seen that duty is one of the three key elements of negligence today. Negligence evolved as a means of loss-shifting at a time when there was little or no insurance or state welfare provision. The industrial revolution in the nineteenth century brought with it increased risks of injury to those working in factories, mines, quarries, and other dangerous situations. The development of railway transportation and mass production dramatically increased the potential for many people to be affected by the faulty conduct of strangers, at the same......

Words: 15172 - Pages: 61

Premium Essay

Predictive Memo on Penn State Scandal

...The court will likely hold Penn State University is liable for negligence actions on the sexual harassment to young children by its former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky. Under the common law, negligence is defined as failure to exercise ordinary care and caution as would be expected by a reasonably prudent person. Therefore, in order to establish a cause of action in negligence, the plaintiff must show (1) a duty on the part of defendant, (2) a breach of that duty, and (3) an injury or damage proximately resulting from the breach. The first element that a duty on the part of defendant to protect the plaintiff is sufficiently met. According to the law, the owner or operator of a sport or recreation business owes a duty to keep the premises safe for all who enter the facility or premises. The incident occurred on Penn State campus. As the owner, the university is imposed a duty of care to individuals coming to the land. The second and third requirements, that the university breaches that duty and the breach was the proximate cause of children’s damages, are in question. The plaintiff will likely be able to charge that Penn State failed to exercise control over coaching staff. In loco parentis doctrine, the relationship between a student athlete and a school is unique and special. School authorities stand “in place of the parents” and the relationship involves a mutual dependence and control by colleges over student-athletes’ lives. Thus a heightened......

Words: 1057 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Davis V. the Board of County Commissioners of Dana Ana County

...Davis v. the Board of County Commissioners of Dana Ana County Patty Turner Dr. John Loblack HRM510 Business Employment Law 11/01/2012 Davis v. the Board of County Commissioners of Dana Ana County This case explores the fundamental legal issue of negligent referrals or misrepresentations of facts that an employer provides regarding a previous employee. Questions for the court to evaluate regarding the matter are: What if provided references are misleading? Can an employer be sued for exercising negligence in referring an unfit employee who harms or show foreseeable possibilities of causing harm on a new job? Who bestows the duty of care? What was the legal issue in this case? The legal issue in the case of Davis v the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County involved the misrepresenting of referral information of a previous employee, Joseph Herrera. Herrera was a detention officer at the Dona Ana County Detention Center who was disciplined for having improper sexual interaction with female prison inmates. In spite of these unprofessional issues, Herrera’s supervisor, Frank Steele, gave him an outstanding reference; a reference that helped him secure another position at another institution. In addition to Steele’s excellent letter of reference, Herrera received a positive verbal recommendation from another supervisor, Mochen. Unfortunately, Herrera did not live up to the positive referrals he received......

Words: 995 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Appellate Brief

...Appellate Brief Kate Voigt July 26, 2013 Professor Doug Simon MBA 660 The Legal and Ethical Environment of Management ______________ No. 1 ___________________________________ IN THE EIGHT CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS _____________________ MARY DEAREST, Petitioner, V. STATE OF MINNESOTA, Respondent, ___________________ IN REVIEW TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA ____________________ BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENT ___________________ Kate Voigt 1678 Snelling Ave, Suite #987 St. Paul, MN 55108 (123) 456-7890 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Authorities………………………………………………………………………5 Statement of the Issues……………………………………………………………………6 Statement of the Case and Facts …………………………………………………..7 Argument…………………………………………………………………..7 Mr. Gonzalez should not be held negligent for leaving the matches on the sales table; they were set out of reach of children, in a position where he could see customers take them if he were to be standing behind the counter. …………………………7,8,9,10,11,12 THE RULING THAT MR. GONZALEZ SHOULD NOT BE HELD NEGLEGENT SHOULD STAND BECAUSE THERE WAS NO FORSEEABLE INJURY INVOLVED IN GIVING THE CUSTOMERS FREE MATCHES…………………………8,9,10 MR. GONZALEZ SHOULDN’T BE HELD NEGLEGENT FOR GIVING HIS CUSTOMERS FREE MATCHES BECAUSE IF THEY WERE DEFECTIVE, THERE SHOULD’VE BEEN A RECALL BUT SINCE THERE WAS NO KNOWN DEFECT, THE MATCHES CANNOT BE RECALLED……………………………………………..9, 10 The court should uphold the ruling due to the product not being defective in its design…..9,10,11,12 THE STATES PRODUCT......

Words: 3426 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Haimes V Vandevender

...Introduction The most basic definition of tort law is a “civil wrong which can be redressed by awarding damages” (Cornell University, 2010). Through the following paper, this basis definition will be used to decide whether two cases, Haimes v. Temple University Hospital and Vandevender v. Sheetz, Inc. were frivolous and whether the outcomes were appropriate. Throughout this paper, eight questions will be applied to determine the merit of the two lawsuits. The eight questions are as follows: 1. What are the facts? 2. What are the issues? 3. What laws apply? 4. What did the judge and jury decide?  5. Did the judge and jury make the appropriate decision based on the applicable laws controlling the case?  6. What are the ethical issues in the cases?  Do the ethical issues differ from the legal issues? 7. Based on the research could either one or both of these cases be considered frivolous? 8. How could the business owners have prevented the lawsuits?  What advice can you give them for the future? Furthermore, by apply the eight questions above I will attempt to determine whether the two lawsuits were perfect examples of the issues facing the United States legal system and whether they characterize the ability to people to bring frivolous claims to light or whether they two lawsuits were unfairly made poster children for excessive rewards without full understanding of the facts of the case. What are the facts? Vandevender The facts presented in the......

Words: 3409 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Business Law

...MCD 2070 – Business Law, Trimester 1 - 2012 Assignment 1 Page 1 of 6 Introduction: In this case, David has been identified as the “Plaintiff” while Robert Boyd Pty. Ltd. has been identified as the “Defendant” [Vicarious Liability]. The issue in this case is whether what rights, if any, does David have against Robert Boyd Pty. Ltd. under the tort of negligent misstatement in relation to Andrew’s assurance relating to the seating capacity of the restaurant. STEP 1: Issue: Does the defendant, Robert Boyd Pty. Ltd., owe the plaintiff, David, a duty of care? Rule: (Shaddock) proves that whenever a person gives information or advice to another upon a serious matter in circumstances where the speaker realises, or ought to realise, that he is being trusted to give the best of his information or advice as a basis for action on the part of the other party and it is reasonable in the circumstances for the other party to act on the information or advice, the speaker comes under a duty to exercise reasonable care in the provision of the information or advice he chooses to give. Application: Hence, in this case, David is a neighbour in the legal sense to the defendant, Robert Boyd Pty. Ltd. as they were paid A$ 25,000 under a contract for their services to design the interior and exterior, including the layout and position of tables and chairs of David’s restaurant. Thereby a closely proximate relationship was formed, where David is closely and directly affected......

Words: 1893 - Pages: 8

Free Essay


...Fall 2014 Business Law Midterm This is a take-home-open-book-midterm. This is NOT a group effort. Work alone. DO NOT WORK TOGETHER! Use a scantron. Write your name on the scantron. True or False (Mark A for True B for False): 1. It is a violation of the separation of powers doctrine for State A to adopt a law identical to one adopted by State B. 2. A basic principle of statutory interpretation is that specific provisions in the statute are of greater weight than general provisions. 3. The town of Somerset passed a law forbidding parking on Main Street between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. This is an example of an ordinance. 4. If one obeys the law, one is necessarily also acting ethically because ethical standards of conduct and legal standards of conduct are identical. 5. One of the important powers of courts in the United States is to interpret legislation. 6. It is the function of the jury to decide the facts that are in dispute in a case. 7. It is unconstitutional to conduct a trial with a jury of fewer than 12 jurors. 8. For diversity of citizenship jurisdiction, each plaintiff must have suffered over $100,000 in damages. 9. Sam Sophomore is suing the school board of Small Town, Iowa for suspending him because he held up a sign at a pep rally denouncing war. He claims that his First Amendment right of free speech was violated. He may file suit in federal district court in Iowa, even though he and the defendant school board members are citizens of Iowa. 10. A......

Words: 1734 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Elements of Negligent Tort: Analysis and Remedies

...removed entirely from tort law and replaced with the state administered workers compensation systems. In order for a plaintiff to utilize the law of torts certain elements need to be present so that a reasonable measure of success can be ensured in the outcome. Elements of Negligent Tort Negligence is the omission to do something, which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which regulate the conduct of human affairs would do or doing something, which a prudent, and reasonable, man would not do’ The essential elements of negligent tort are 1) Duty of reasonable care, 2) Breach of duty of care, 3) Breach was actual, and proximate cause of injury .Tort is what is in the tort books but only thing holding it together is their binding’, hence to win a negligence case, plaintiff must prove each of three elements. Duty of reasonable care: According to Negligence law, normally members of society should behave in ways that avoid the creation of unreasonable risks of harms to others. The standard for assessing such conduct is called µreasonable care standard and in most cases the duty to exercise reasonable care, serves as the relevant duty for the purpose of a negligence claim’s first element . Breach of duty: This is the second element of negligent tort, which requires plaintiff to establish that defendant failed to act as a reasonable person would have acted, thus negligent law’s focus on...

Words: 1336 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Unit 2 Part 1

...Unit 2 Part 1 Shamica Jones Kaplan University Business Law September 1, 2013 The factors that indicate whether Davis owed Esposito a duty of care, so as to avoid allegations of negligence consist of three basic elements. “They are: 1. The likelihood that Davis’ conduct will injure others, taken with 2. The seriousness of the injury, if it happens, 3. Balanced against the cost of the precaution he must take to avoid the risk of negligence. . If the product of the likelihood of the injury exceeds the burden of the precautions, the risk is unreasonable and the failure to take precautions is negligence.” The Louisiana law that set precedents over trip-and-fall cases was Frelow v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. The ruling in this case was that Louisiana law recognizes a legal duty on the part of employees to exercise reasonable care not to obstruct the flow of pedestrian traffic. Esposito was walking out of an exit of an arts and crafts show when Davis, an employee of the show’s producer decided suddenly to turn, without warning, and knock Esposito to the ground. One witness account said, “It appeared as if Davis had forgotten something because he snapped his fingers while quickly turning”. Davis admitted that he did not look when he turned. These factors indicate that Davis was negligent. It was the show’s producers’ responsibility to make sure that precautions were taken to avoid risk on the property. Esposito had to prove that Davis...

Words: 811 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Esposito Incident

...  Jason Davis an employer who was hosting an arts and crafts show knocked Ms. Esposito, an 80-year-old elderly woman to the ground. After falling to the ground, Esposito fractured her hip on impact. After hip replacement surgery, she was left with a permanent physical impairment and is seeking remedies for her injury through the federal court, claiming negligence on behalf of Davis and other parties. The factors that indicate whether Mr. Davis may or may not owe Ms. Esposito a duty of care is, he turned and collided with her. Consequently, Ms. Esposito was left with a lifelong physical impairment after being knocked to the ground by Mr. Davis. Although his actions were unforeseeable and unintentional, he is now liable under the tort of negligence to provide remedies for her injury. Ms. Esposito has filed suit in federal district court against Mr. Davis and others in order for her losses to be satisfied. Negligence according to is, pertaining to or involving a civil action for compensation for damages filed by a person who claims to have suffered an injury or loss in an accident caused by another's negligence. (, 2012) The tortfeasor neither wishes to bring about the consequences of the act nor believes that they will occur. This was an unforeseeable accident; in order for Ms. Esposito to move further in her suit she must prove that Davis (the defendant) owed her a duty of care, that the defendant breached that duty, the victim (Esposito)......

Words: 672 - Pages: 3