Negligence

In: Other Topics

Submitted By shneee1
Words 3381
Pages 14
| | ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET(adapted for LAW1100 major essay submission purposes) |

UNITCode: LAW1100TITLE: Legal Framework I | NAME OF STUDENT (PRINT CLEARLY) fisher shane FAMILY NAME FIRST NAME | STUDENT ID. NO.10104032 |
NAME OF LECTURER (PRINT CLEARLY)brad moore | DUE DATE18/4/2011 |
Topic of assignmentDuty of Care IN THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE |
Group or tutorial (if applicable) | Courselegal framework 1100 | Campusmt lawley |
I certify that the attached assignment is my own work and that any material drawn from other sources has been acknowledged. Copyright in assignments remains my property. I grant permission to the University to make copies of assignments for assessment, review and/or record keeping purposes. I note that the University reserves the right to check my assignment for plagiarism. Should the reproduction of all or part of an assignment be required by the University for any purpose other than those mentioned above, appropriate authorisation will be sought from me on the relevant form. |
OR, if submitting this paper electronically as per instructions for the unit, place an ‘X’ in the box below to indicate that you have read this form and filled it in completely and that you certify as above. Please include this page in/with your submission. Any electronic responses to this submission will be sent to your ECU email address (or, where relevant, the digital dropbox for the Blackboard site for LAW1100).Agreement X Date 29/3/2011 |
PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES ON LATE ASSIGNMENTS - Refer to the University Admission, Enrolment and Academic Progress Rule 24 and the ECU Assessment Policy
A student who wishes to defer the submission of an assignment must apply to the lecturer in charge of the relevant unit or course for an extension of the time within which to submit the assignment.
Where an extension is…...

Similar Documents

Negligence

...How to Avoid 4 Common Negligence Mistakes on Torts Essays Wednesday, December 5, 2012 California Bar Applicants, Welcome to the latest issue of our California Bar Exam newsletter. For those of you preparing for the February 2013 exam or looking ahead to the July 2013 California bar exam, we consider the following in this issue: • Important Upcoming California Bar Exam Dates • Recent BarReviewSolutions.com California Bar Exam News & Announcements • California Bar Exam Essays In-Depth: How to Avoid Common Mistakes with Negligence on Torts Essays • California Bar Exam Newsletter Discount Important Upcoming California Bar Exam Dates ________________________________________ • Final Filing Deadline for February 2013 Exam: January 15, 2013 • California Bar Exam: February 26-28, 2013 Recent BarReviewSolutions.com California Bar Exam News & Announcements ________________________________________ A few spots remain for our February 2013 Ultimate program via Expedited Scheduling. Begin today... Just starting a February 2013 review or thinking ahead to the July 2013 California bar exam? Start your review off on the right track with our FREE Improve Your Bar Review Guide (2013 Edition). Obtain your copy today... For repeaters, July 2012 Assessments are now available. Sign-up today and learn from your prior exam mistakes as you prepare for an upcoming exam... California Bar Exam Essays In-Depth: How to Avoid Common Mistakes with Negligence on Torts Essays...

Words: 1105 - Pages: 5

Negligence

...It is human nature to make mistakes; however, mistakes that cause harm to someone else could be considered negligence. In the case with Mr. Benson in the Neighborhood Newspaper article, a mistake was made that was irreversible. He went into the hospital to have his leg amputated, and the doctor amputated the wrong leg. The question is was the doctor negligent in his practice? Is the amputation of the wrong leg considered to be malpractice on the doctor’s part? This paper will differentiate between negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice. After differentiating between these terms, it will be determined if the doctor operating on Mr. Benson was considered to be negligent, gross negligent or was this mistake malpractice. To determine if the doctor who operated on Mr. Benson was negligent, the term negligent has to be defined. According to the Journal of Legal Nurse Consulting (2007), negligence is defined as the failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in a similar situation, any conduct that falls below the legal standard established to protect others against unreasonable risk of harm, except for conduct that is intentionally, wantonly, or willfully disregardful of others’ rights. In Mr. Benson’s case, the doctor would be considered to be negligent. The surgeon did not act in the same way another surgeon, in the same practice would have acted. For some reason, not all the measures were taken to......

Words: 332 - Pages: 2

Negligence

...What is negligence? Negligence is the breach of a legal duty of care which causes loss or injury to the person to whom the duty is owned. There are three elements of an actionable negligence: 1. duty of care 2. breach of duty 3. damages resulting from that breach 1) Duty of care • Relational Proximity (neighbour = someone affected by your act) • Forseeability (any considerations that ought to reduce the scope of duty of care) • Whether is all circumstances it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care. Duty of Care? 1. Was the defendant careless/negligent? 2. Did he act like a reasonable man? 3. What did he omit to do? • Where D should have interceded for P protection e.g. motorist's duty to control passengers so that they do not cause injury to other road users. • Where D omitted to observe the rules of the road 4. Does a duty of care exist? • We have to ask ourselves is a duty of care owed to the person who we can reasonably foresee will be injured by our acts or omissions. • Duty of Care not only applies to acts and omissions but also to words/statements • A duty could arise that due to a careless statement it leads to economic loss. • e.g a special relationship of trust and advice in a professional capacity • Plantiff (Prosecutor....claim damages) • Defendant (person who caused the damage or...

Words: 793 - Pages: 4

Negligence

...Whether you suffer injury in a car, truck or motorcycle accident or in a slip and fall accident, chances are your legal case rests on one thing: proving the existence of negligence. However, unless you are a lawyer yourself, you may not know what negligence is, in legal terms. Negligence is the failure to provide reasonable care and as a result, cause injury to another person. Negligence can appear on the road, in hospitals, at home, in restaurants, at grocery stores and many other locations. Any time you are involved in an accident that causes you injury, it is important to determine if negligence was the cause. By contacting a skilled personal injury lawyer, you can obtain valuable information about your case and your chances of receiving compensation. Listed below are the four elements of negligence: Duty of care: As a personal injury plaintiff, your first job, or rather the job of your attorney, is to show that the defendant owed you a duty of care. Breach of duty: Next, you must show that the defendant breached the duty of care that he or she owed to you. Factual causation: After establishing there has been a breach of duty, you must prove that the defendant’s actions caused your injury. Damages: The last element you must establish in that you suffered actual harm as a result of the defendant’s action or inaction. Proving negligence is usually the cornerstone of a plaintiff’s personal injury case. If you are unsure as to whether your accident was caused by......

Words: 297 - Pages: 2

Negligence

... Examples of Contributory and Comparative Negligence Contributory Negligence Janet Klein's car collides with Bill Hutchinson’s car. Janet sues Bill, claiming injuries caused by Bill’s negligence. Bill claims that Janet’s own negligence contributed to causing the accident. Contributory negligence would completely bar Janet’s claim, even though Bill is partly at fault, too. Comparative Negligence Dr. Turner malpractices, but the patient makes the situation worse by failing to take the prescribed medication. The jury decides the harm was caused 75% by the doctor and 25% by the patient. In such a case, the doctor would pay the patient 75% of her damages. Under comparative negligence, the party at fault pays the percentage damages he or she causes. Modified Comparative Negligence Some states create additional requirements if the plaintiff is partly at fault. These states require that the defendant’s fault meet a minimum threshold before the defendant has to pay anything. A common threshold might be requiring that defendant’s fault be greater than plaintiff’s. Example In the Dr. Turner case we just looked at, the doctor's negligence was greater than the patient’s negligence. The threshold is met and Dr. Turner pays 75% of damages. However, if the jury found the doctor 40% at fault and the patient 60% at fault, Dr. Turner would pay nothing because the threshold was not met. An Example of Assumption of Risk in a Medical Context Dr. Miller explains to Steve Cassidy the...

Words: 1081 - Pages: 5

Negligence

...NEGLIGENCE – DUTY AND PROXIMATE CAUSE STANDARD NEGLIGENCE Negligence is the most common tort liability. Contrasted with intentional torts where there is a desire by the actor to cause some harmful result, negligence occurs without a desire to cause a harmful result by contact, but nonetheless does cause harm to the person being injured even without the desire. Simply put, negligence is conduct, and not a state of mind. It usually is associated with accidents or carelessness. An accident may be unavoidable if the occurrence was not intended and which, under all the circumstances, could not have been foreseen or prevented by the exercise of “reasonable” precautions. The central premise of negligence is that we all are members of a collective society that depend on a social order for the good of the community and to promote commerce. How members of the social community conduct themselves will impact other members both for the good and sometimes for the bad. Essentially, this is a “limited duty” all members have to other members to be “reasonably” careful in their conduct to avoid injury to others. When the duty implicit in the circumstances is breached and injury to another occurs, the injured person may recover damages to compensate them for their harm by proving that the conduct of the person causing the harm was negligent. Negligence rules attempt to strike a balance between properly compensating people for their injuries and protecting society and its members from...

Words: 3700 - Pages: 15

Negligence

...Law of Negligence Introduction The requirement of the law of negligence is that individuals’ conduct should conform to certain standards of behavior (Steininger, B., & Koziol, 2005). When the actions of a person violate these standards, it is required by the law that they compensate the victim on their failure to conform to the standards. The law is under torts and its appearance dates back to 1932 in a case of Donoghue vs. Stevenson (Baudouin, 2010). In the case at hand involving Emma a girl who sustained injuries as a result of flying debris and the SCL Company, the law is applicable in several dimensions. There indeed exists a cause of action against SCL Company as discussed in details in the essay below. To start with, the case passes an impartial test by ascertaining the foreseeability of the eminence of harm not only to Emma but to any other person. As presented in Jolly vs. Sutton (2000), the council owed a duty to the young boy for negligence of removing the old boat from the flats (Baudouin, 2010). It was thus evident that the presence of the boat near the flats presented a threat of life to the young children around that vicinity. The municipal was thus responsible for the injury that the boy suffered. It was thus ruled that the municipal had to reimburse for the injuries sustained by the boy. Applied in the case at hand, the SCL Company owed a duty to Emma because it was their duty to ensure that the roof tiles are tightly fitted to prevent them from...

Words: 2073 - Pages: 9

Negligence

...3-30 1 202 - Compliance with standards 2 501 - Acts discreditable 3 502 - Advertising and other forms of solicitation 4 503 - Commission and referral fees 5 302 - Contingent fees 6 101 - Independence 7 101 - Independence 8 201 - General Standards 9 101 - Independence 10 505 - Form of organization and name 11 102 - Integrity and objectivity 12 203 - Accounting principles 13 302 - Contingent fees 14 301 - Confidential client information 15 202 - Compliance with standards 3-35 1 a - The independence has been impaired b - A partner cannot be employed by a client. This violates Section 101 2 a - Ethical Manufacturing Co. has been involved in fraud. b - Herb standard did not violate any section. His client refused to fix the audited financials and he reported them to the IRS. 3 a - b - 4 a - The independence has been impaired b - This violates Section 101-5. A member cannot can not have a loan to or from an audit client. 5 a - The independence has not been impaired b - As long as Herb does not get involved in the transactions between the two clients, the Code of ethics is not violated. 4-20 Constructive fraud -......

Words: 293 - Pages: 2

Negligence

...Nursing Negligence When one visits the doctor, the intended purpose is to regain health. Unfortunately, it’s not always like that. Cases of medical malpractice occur every day. Health is fragile, there are numerous of simple mistakes that can have a lifelong impact which can destroy innocent lives. The term malpractice in the healthcare field originally consisted only of negligence words from a physician. In the past, there was a distinct division between a nurse and a physician. Nurses use to work with a defined framework. Instead of treating symptoms or diagnosing patients, nurses would simply wait for a physicians order then implement it. As time passed, the role of a nurse has changed. Some nurses in hospitals and clinics have assumed responsibilities of a physician such as the actual examination and treatment of a patient. Nurses take on these roles often without any supervision of a physician which causes more and more nurses to be named as defendants in malpractice lawsuits (Nursing Negligence, 2006, October 17, p.1). When nurses exceed their scope of practice, they violate their nursing license (Fremgen, 2002, p. 137). Many individuals immediately associate medical negligence with a physician but, nurse negligence is far more common than people think. Nurses are often responsible for filling out information on a patients chart, administering a patient’s medicine, taking vital signs and recording them accurately. Clearly, there are many duties that a nurse...

Words: 1087 - Pages: 5

Negligence

...Negligence Latasha Adegboruwa University of Phoenix Health Law and ethics HCS/478 Lynda White April 18, 2011 Negligence “Registered nurses have more professional accountability than at any other time in the history of nursing. As a result, nurses must confront the fact that they now owe a higher duty of care to their patients, and by extension, are more exposed to civil claims for negligence than ever before”(Weld and Bibb, 2009, p 2). “Negligence is described as failure to use such care as a reasonable prudent and careful person would use under similar circumstances” (Weld and Bibb, 2009, p3). Common examples of negligence are malnutrition, inadequate hydration, physical injury was done, and it was the result of the nurse’s care or lack thereof. There are five main elements in a nursing negligence case and all five elements have to be proven for a case to be valid 1. The nurse had a duty to perform. 2. The appropriate care was not apparent in the situation. 3. There was a breach of violation of care 3. There was injury proven to result from the nurse’s negligence and 5. There is proof that damages occurred as a direct result of the situation. (Avery, 2009). Gross negligence is a more serious form of negligence and goes further than carelessness. While regular negligence is seen as a person falling below the standard of care, gross negligence is seen as complete failure to show care and in fact implies recklessness or a willful disregard for the...

Words: 1167 - Pages: 5

Negligence

...Negligence Telisha Winbush HCS/478 6/7/2015 Barbara Scheibe Negligence In the simulation, the Neighborhood 2.0, season 3 episode 7, Mr. Joseph Benson has had the wrong leg amputated in surgery and wakes up in terror when he discovers what has happened. The newspaper claims that Mr. Benson was affected by negligence. However, that is only partially accurate; there is a distinct difference between negligence and malpractice and I believe that this is a case of malpractice. Nurses need to act on ethical and legal principles to protect themselves from legal implications. In keeping with these corrective actions, nurses also need to make sure that their documentation is accurate. Negligence and Malpractice Negligence as defined by Wacker-Guido, is “a general term that denotes conduct lacking in due care” (2010) and it is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as the “Lack of attention to what ought to be done; failure to take proper or necessary care of a thing or person; lack of necessary or reasonable care in doing something; carelessness” (“Negligence,” 2015). The Oxford English Dictionary defines malpractice as, “treatment given by a member of the medical profession that departs from a generally accepted standard of practice and results in injury to the patient, through negligence, ignorance, lack of skill, or malicious intent” (“Malpractice,” 2015). According to Wacker- Guido (2010), the definition of malpractice is “any...

Words: 1340 - Pages: 6

Negligence

...In the health care field, the term malpractice originally encompassed only the negligent wrongs of a physician. In the past, a distinct division existed between a nurse and a physician. Rather than diagnose patients, treat symptoms, or prescribe medication, it was sufficient for the nurse to wait for and then simply implement a physician’s order. In years past it was virtually unprecedented for a nurse to criticize a physician’s order. The role of the nurse, however, has changed. Today, nurses commonly assume functions previously performed only by the physician. In hospitals and clinics across the country, nurses have assumed the responsibilities such as the actual examination, diagnosis, and treatment of a patient, oftentimes without any direct supervision by a physician. Medical malpractice is generally defined as negligence on the part of a physician, nurse, EMT, hospital or other health care professionals. Negligence is at part with failure to perform medical obligations under normal standard of care. The nurses are also involved when patients get injured either physically and/or mentally as results of medical malpractice. Due to current shortage of nursing professionals, nurses on the job are inevitably overloaded with work and duties. Nurses are not getting enough rest that they need to stay alert at all times due to longer shifts. Inattentiveness often leads to medical mistakes that cause serious harm to patients. Another root of the nurse malpractice is...

Words: 389 - Pages: 2

Negligence

...It is normal for humans to make mistakes: however, some mistakes can cause harm or death to someone and could be considered negligence. A case of possible negligence has been identified at the Neighborhood Hospital. A patient went in for a leg amputation and the wrong leg was amputated. Unfortunately, this error is not reversible for the patient. In this situation the physician and staff involved during the surgery would be considered negligent. There are specific processes and policies that each facility takes to ensure mistakes like this do not happen such as: taking a time out in the operating room prior to the surgery and marking the site that they will be operating on. All staff in the operating room must participate in the time out. During the time out the patient is identified as the correct patient, the correct surgery will be performed, surgical consent is signed, and the site is marked that they will be operating on. It is obvious in this case that the appropriate steps were not taken by the physician or surgical staff. Was the physician, staff or both responsible for the error? Could this become a malpractice case? With our scenario it is difficult to determine whether this would be considered negligence, gross negligence, or malpractice. We have very little information and facts about the case therefore it is hard to determine which one would apply to this case. In the ever-changing health care world it is critical for nurses to be familiar with...

Words: 1283 - Pages: 6

Negligence

...Negligence is conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others. In other words, every individual is responsible, not only for his or her results of stubborn acts, but also for the injury one may have caused to another by wanting ordinary care in the management of his or her property. To prove negligence, there are four elements used. (1)Duty of care (2) Breach of Duty of Care (3) Causation and (4) Damages. (1) Duty of care, which is an element of a cause of action for negligence, is the existence of a duty to use due care toward an interest of another that enjoys legal protection against unintentional invasion. (2) Breach of duty of care is the next element which says that the plaintiff, in this case, Ms. Warren, is required to show not only that the defendant owed her a duty of care, but also that he had breached his duty of care to the her (3) Causation is the third element to prove negligence and that is when the plaintiff, Ms. Warren, must show or prove that there is a causal connection between the negligent conduct and the resulting injury. Moreover, to determine this, Ms. Warren has to prove that without the defendents negligence towards the plaintiff, she would not have sustained the loss. Lastly (4) Damages, which is the element in which when the plaintiff, Ms. Warren, must be able to indicate that she sustained actual loss or damage resulting from negligence...

Words: 252 - Pages: 2

Negligence

...Negligence In today’s busy health care industry nurses and doctors are pushed to the limit. We are asked to make life and death decisions in mere seconds. Society is also more aware of what they should expect from health care providers. This awareness demands health care providers not only provide excellent care, but also document the care they provide to ensure they are not subject to accusations of negligence, or gross negligence that can lead to malpractice suits. This paper will differentiate between negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice. In order to further examine these issues an article titled “Amputation mishap, negligence cited” from The Neighborhood News in which “Earlier this week, 62-year-old Joseph Benson underwent an amputation of his leg just below the left knee and only suffered one complication- the wrong leg was amputated” (Lowell, n.d.) will be discussed. This will include the determination of whether or not this example is a case for negligence, gross negligence, or malpractice. This discussion will also include the importance of documentation and its correlation to potential negligence, the ethical principles I would use to guide my practice in this situation, and how I would document to satisfy ethical and legal requirements. Most people do not understand the distinction between negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice. According to Guido (2010), a plaintiff must prove that there was a duty to the patient, that a breach of the duty owed...

Words: 1650 - Pages: 7