...Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Clause Cynthia Yvette Bevel LAW/531 August 9, 2010 Michael Carrozzo Abstract A Lawsuit through the court system to resolve disputes can result in a significant amount of time lost in addition to extensive litigation cost. Some businesses avoid costly litigation by opting to resolving disputes through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and other aids. When teams have disputes among members, an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Clause would be an effective tool in resolving conflict with minimal impact or disruption. The most common form of ADR is arbitration. However, other forms are negotiation and mediation. Arbitration Arbitration is a legal technique for the resolution of disputes outside the courts, wherein the parties to a dispute refer it to one or more persons, by whose decision they agree to be bound. When a dispute arises within a learning team, arbitration is used when the arbitrator is brought in to resolve a dispute. This usually resolves disputes in a timely fashion because the arbitrator renders a decision based on facts. Negotiation Negotiation is a procedure whereby the parties to a dispute engage in negotiations to try and reach a voluntary settlement of their dispute. (Source: LAW/531 – Chapter3: Judicial, Alternative, and Online Dispute Resolution). This is the simplest form of the ADR in which the teammates would negotiate before approaching any other forms. Mediation Mediation is a form of...
Words: 357 - Pages: 2
...| Alternative Dispute Resolutions | | | Alternative dispute resolutions, known to many as ADR, are methods to resolve conflicts in ways other than legal litigation. “Because litigation is expensive and time-consuming, both [parties] suffer when parties bring their disputes to court. Alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) is an important solution” (Baum, 2010). The four most common methods of ADR are negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and collaborative law. A fifth method, conciliation, sometimes falls into the ADR category. The use of ADRs has been proven to be helpful in many different types of legal disputes from personal to professional (Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), 1995-2013). Alternative dispute resolutions are non-adversarial methods used to successfully manage conflict without the use of unnecessary, expensive litigation. Negotiation Negotiation is the simplest way to settle differences. This method is back and forth communication trying to find a solution to resolve a conflict. The characteristics of negotiation are as followed: private, confidential, voluntary, quick, little to no cost, parties make their own decisions, parties reach agreements, full control, enforceable agreements, win-win solutions (Oklahoma Bar Association, 2012). Negotiation can be done in a number of ways: formal, informal, private, public, directly or with third parties (although third parties typically aren’t necessary). It can happen any time, any place. Those...
Words: 1572 - Pages: 7
...together with increasing globalization have led to more flexible means of resolving disputes which provide alternatives to court-based litigation governed by the law and procedure of a particular state or country. Disputes are generally an inevitable part of human interaction; they may be domestic, international, civil, commercial or economic in nature. Litigation has been the traditional method of resolving disputes, which may arise as a result of default by a party. Overtime, the process of litigation has become more and more time consuming, expensive and cumbersome and increase in the number of cases in courts have led to congestion and delay in their resolution. Some Disputes are sensitive and confidential in nature and disputants may prefer settlement in private to one in public glare of court. In addition, the complexity of court litigation tends often times towards increase in costs which disputants are naturally anxious to reduce. On the other hand, there may be claims involving small sums, which may not be worth the cost of litigation. All these have led to the development of alternative methods of resolving disputes. 1.2 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS The term “Alternative Dispute Resolution” (ADR), is used generally to describe the methods and procedures used in resolving disputes either as alternatives to the traditional dispute resolution mechanism of the court or in some cases supplementary to such mechanisms. ADR arose...
Words: 5840 - Pages: 24
...Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) (also known as external dispute resolution in some countries, such as Australia[1]) includes dispute resolution processes and techniques that act as a means for disagreeing parties to come to an agreement short of litigation. It is a collective term for the ways that parties can settle disputes, with (or without) the help of a third party. Despite historic resistance to ADR by many popular parties and their advocates, ADR has gained widespread acceptance among both the general public and the legal profession in recent years. In fact, some courts now require some parties to resort to ADR of some type, usually mediation, before permitting the parties' cases to be tried (indeed the European Mediation Directive (2008) expressly contemplates so-called "compulsory" mediation; attendance that is, not settlement at mediation). The rising popularity of ADR can be explained by the increasing caseload of traditional courts, the perception that ADR imposes fewer costs than litigation, a preference for confidentiality, and the desire of some parties to have greater control over the selection of the individual or individuals who will decide their dispute.[2] Some of the senior judiciary in certain jurisdictions (of which England and Wales is one) are strongly in favour of the use of mediation to settle disputes.[3] Please read: a personal appeal from Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales Read now Alternative dispute resolution From Wikipedia, the free...
Words: 6090 - Pages: 25
...Michael Cusick Alternative Dispute Resolution Law and Ethics for Managers January 13, 2011 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) can be used to refer to a variety of methods used to resolve disputes outside the formal court system (Bagley & Savage, 2010). Less expensive and timely than formal trials, an ADR can provide companies with much-needed privacy for discreet matters, help to maintain relations with strategic business partners, and may provide more flexible and creative resolutions to disputes (Clarkson, Cross, Jentz, & Miller, 2004). Negotiation, mediation, and arbitration are the most popular types of ADR (Bagley & Savage, 2010). For the benefit of business managers, this paper will review what is involved in the each ADR process, recommend steps to prepare for each type of action, look at some advantages and/or disadvantages of each, and discuss how legally binding the decided outcome of each ADR may be for the parties involved. One of the most simple and least formal types of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is negotiation. During a negotiation the disputants meet informally, with or without council, to attempt to settle their differences (Bagley & Savage, 2010). In some cases the court may require that the parties attempt to negotiate before a trail to attempt to reach a resolution and will only hear the case if cannot reach an agreement on their own accord (Clarkson, Cross, Jentz, & Miller, 2004). The disputing parties may also resolve...
Words: 1083 - Pages: 5
...Learning Team ADR It sometimes takes years in the court system to resolve a dispute, and this can become very expensive. To avoid these problems most businesses are turning to alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Alternative dispute resolutions are methods of resolving disputes other than litigation (Cheeseman, 2010). The most frequently used resolutions are arbitration, negotiation, and mediation. A learning team has many reasons for a disagreement, this includes lack of participation, amount contributed to projects, attendance, and timely communication. However, if a team has a disagreement, all members will agree to resolve the dispute by negotiation. Negotiation is the simplest form of ADR, which is a procedure whereby the parties to a dispute engage in negotiations to try to reach a voluntary settlement of their dispute (Cheeseman, 2010). If the team cannot reach an agreement through negotiating, the team will try mediation. Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution in which the parties use a third party (mediator) to recommend a resolution of their disagreement (Cheeseman, 2010). The entire team has to agree for a mediator to help settle the team disagreement. The mediator is usually a person who is a specialist in the area of dispute. A mediator’s role is to assist the team in reaching an agreement. When mediation is not successful, the team handles the dispute by means of arbitration. The class facilitator will serve as the arbitrator...
Words: 365 - Pages: 2
...Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism The Concept & its efficacy: “It is the spirit and not the form of law that keeps the justice alive.” LJ Earl Warren The concept of Conflict Management through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has introduced a new mechanism of dispute resolution that is non adversarial. A dispute is basically ‘lis inter partes’ and the justice dispensation system in India has found an alternative to Adversarial litigation in the form of ADR Mechanism. New methods of dispute resolution such as ADR facilitate parties to deal with the underlying issues in dispute in a more cost-effective manner and with increased efficacy. In addition, these processes have the advantage of providing parties with the opportunity to reduce hostility, regain a sense of control, gain acceptance of the outcome, resolve conflict in a peaceful manner, and achieve a greater sense of justice in each individual case. The resolution of disputes takes place usually in private and is more viable, economic, and efficient. ADR is generally classified into at least four types: negotiation, mediation, collaborative law, and arbitration. (Sometimes a fifth type, conciliation, is included as well, but for present purposes it can be regarded as a form of mediation Need of ADR in India: The system of dispensing justice in India has come under great stress for several reasons mainly because of the huge pendency of cases in courts. In India, the number of cases filed in the courts...
Words: 3624 - Pages: 15
...that the large part of my time, during the twenty years of my practice as a lawyer, was occupied in bringing about private compromises of hundreds of cases. I lost nothing, thereby not even money, certainly not my soul." Conflict is a fact of life. It is not good or bad. However, what is important is how we manage or handle it. Negotiation techniques are often central to resolving conflict and as a basic technique these have been around for many thousands of years. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to a variety of streamlined resolution techniques designed to resolve issues in controversy more efficiently when the normal negotiation process fails. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an alternative to the Formal Legal System. It is an alternative to litigation. It was being thought of in view of the fact that the Courts are over burdened with cases. The said system emanates from dissatisfaction of many people with the way in which disputes are traditionally resolved resulting in criticism of the Courts, the legal profession and sometimes lead to a sense of alienation from the whole legal system- thus, the need for Alternative Dispute Resolution. With the spread of ADR programs in the developed and developing world, creative uses for and designs for ADR systems are proliferating. Successful programs are improving the lives of individuals and meeting broad societal goals. There is a critical mass of ADR experience, revealing important lessons as to whether, when and how...
Words: 3549 - Pages: 15
...Dispute resolution strategies Name Institution Abstract The paper is about dispute resolution strategies. It identifies three strategies and discusses them in details. Specifically, the paper entails an elaborate discussion on mediation, negotiation and compromise as conflict resolution strategies. Mediation and negotiation are alternative dispute resolution ADR strategies while compromise is an incorporation of litigation and can also be part of ADR. The three strategies are applicable for organizational and other types of conflicts. Apart from proposals off the potential applications of the methods, the paper also presents a comparison between the three methods and the legal systems of resolving conflict. In addition, it discusses in brief the processes, benefits and the limitations of the processes. Mediation Mediation entails a due process that involves a neutral third party, a mediator, in conflict resolution. The mediator is never judgmental nor partisan during the process. The mediator never decides any wrongdoers but focus on the problem-solving process. Mediation allows for the revision and adjustment of the conflict scope. Agreements after mediation are readily acceptable than those from a judicial ruling because all participants are involved in reaching a compromise. Mediation is informal and involves a mediator that guides the process. The mediator engages the disputants to drop hostilities and come to a mutual agreement. In fact...
Words: 1477 - Pages: 6
...Alternative Dispute Resolution The Employer’s Secret Quola-Kito Davis University of Phoenix Abstract This paper will explore the legal description of Grocer’s Supply Incorporated. It will explore how the case of Quola-Kito Davis v. Grocer’s Supply Incorporated & Mitsubishi Forklift case was processed through the court system and detail the method of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) which was used, as opposed to litigation that may have occurred. In conclusion, it will survey the differences in expenditures and advantages of traditional litigation as compared to Alternative Dispute Resolution in this specific case. Alternative Dispute Resolution The Employer’s Secret Alternative Dispute Resolution is any processes of resolving issues without the use of traditional litigation. It involves negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. As courts begin to become backlogged coupled with the increasing expenses associated with litigations more companies have begun implementing ADR agreements. Some ADR agreements are voluntary while others are mandatorily written into contracts and employment agreements. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a method which aids companies and/or individuals settle disputes without having to utilize traditional litigation. The ADR procedures are inclusive of arbitration, mediation, and unbiased assessment utilizing the law concerning those matters issues. ADR are less formal and less taxing; in addition, they are confidential unless...
Words: 605 - Pages: 3
...Alternative Dispute Resolution – Clause for Learning Team José M. Santana Ortiz LAW 531 February 12, 2014 Prof. Israel Camacho- Alicea Alternative Dispute Resolution – Clause for Learning Team Alternative Dispute Resolution means the form and manner to handle a conflict or disputed. Typically Alternative Dispute Resolution has seven parts or segments, Negotiation, Arbitration, Mediation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact finding and Judicial referee. But the most used of these or more common is Arbitration. Negotiation is the first step to resolving a dispute into the parties. Alternative Dispute Resolution is the economic way before reaching to the court to start a legal process. According to Cheeseman (2010) Arbitration is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution in which the parties choose an impartial third party to hear and decide the dispute (p.44). To resolve problems or conflicts in our Learning Team will use negotiation. Is important hear all components of the Learning Team to reach an agreement. This is the first step to growth like a team. The trust we have with each other is essential part to complete and achieve our goals. If the problem persists is time to take another action to reach an agreement. In this case a consulting by Learning Team with the instructor is recommended. Points will be discussed with the instructor to discuss and we suggest a possible solution or agreement to the problem or dispute requested. According to Cheeseman (2010)...
Words: 317 - Pages: 2
...Alternative Dispute Resolution In today’s environment, there are no escaping disputes. There are many avenues to resolve these disagreements when they cannot be resolved amicably. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to any means of settling disputes outside of the courtroom. ADR typically includes early neutral evaluation, negotiation, conciliation, mediation, and arbitration. As burgeoning court queues, rising costs of litigation, and time delays continue to plague litigants, more states have begun experimenting with ADR programs. Some of these programs are voluntary; others are mandatory. While the two most common forms of ADR are arbitration and mediation, negotiation is almost always attempted first to resolve a dispute. It is the preeminent mode of dispute resolution. Negotiation allows the parties to meet in order to settle a dispute. The main advantage of this form of dispute settlement is that it allows the parties themselves to control the process and the solution. Mediation is also an informal alternative to litigation. Mediators are individuals trained in negotiations, who bring opposing parties together and attempt to work out a settlement or agreement that both parties accept or reject. Mediation is used for a wide gamut of case-types ranging from juvenile felonies to federal government negotiations with Native American Indian tribes. Mediation has also become a significant method for resolving disputes between investors and their stock brokers...
Words: 320 - Pages: 2
...Alternative dispute resolution (ADL) is simply defined as “Any method of resolving disputes other than litigation,” (Alternative Dispute Resolution). This simply means that issues which would normally be brought before a court or have a trial are instead handled through alternative means that do not involve the court. ADL can be used for both criminal and civil cases. Because of the difficulty and cost involved with trials, lawyers, and court proceedings in general, use of ADL is becoming increasingly popular in the United States of America. There are several different types of ADL, but the main types currently being practiced are negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. ADR is useful for a wide variety of conflicts. As stated earlier, it can be used for both criminal and civil cases. However, because negotiation is the go to form of ADR, it stands to reason that cases in which the two parties can directly negotiate, or at least negotiate with the assistance of mediators, are the types of conflict that find ADR the most useful. For this reason, civil cases would often appear to be more appropriate for ADR. Conflicts that benefit from negotiation, such as minor lawsuits between individuals that know each other, are the types of conflicts that are best solved by the use of ADR. ADR is probably best for conflicts that occur which simply aren’t important enough to bring to a court. These problems include the everyday conflicts that occur in the workplace. Negotiation is a direct...
Words: 778 - Pages: 4
...Third Party Conflict Resolution January 17, 2013 Third Party Conflict Resolution In the negotiation process, the use of third-party conflict resolutions often comes into play when parties cannot seem to reach an agreement regarding resolving mutual interests. These types of third-party conflict resolutions are: arbitration, collaboration, litigation and mediation. For the Seatcor Manufacturing Company, the use of third-party conflict resolution is necessary. The researchers of Team A have reported collaborative ideas of this case by (1) analyzing the possible intervention strategies, (2) applying what is thought to be the best strategy, (3) explained how the best strategy should resolve the conflict, and (4) developed a contingency plan in case the best strategy does not work, or is rejected. Intervention strategies Possible intervention strategies include negotiation, mediation, arbitration, litigation, collaboration and hybrids. Two types of hybrid intervention strategies are mediation – arbitration and arbitration-mediation. • Negotiation - There are four elements to the negotiation process, which include managing interdependence, engaging in mutual adjustment, creating or claiming value, and managing conflict. Negotiations consist of two or more parties be that individuals, groups, or organizations. A conflict of needs and desires exist between parties and the parties chose to negotiate. Parties expect a “give and take” process that is fundamental...
Words: 1784 - Pages: 8
... | | |School of Business | | |MGT/445 (3 Credits)Version 1 | | |Organizational Negotiations | | |Puerto Rico Campus | Copyright © 2009, 2006 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Course Description This course provides an overview of negotiations in an organizational setting. Students learn negotiation processes and strategies, the role of stakeholder interests in negotiation, and how to apply these concepts to the workplace. Students also examine conflict management techniques and emerging negotiation trends in globalization and technology. Policies Faculty and students/learners will be held responsible for understanding and adhering to all policies contained within the following two documents: University policies: You must be logged into the student website to view this document. Instructor policies: This document is posted in the Course Materials forum. University policies are subject to change. Be sure to read the policies...
Words: 2010 - Pages: 9
