...Negotiation is the process of involving different groups with different interests. In the negotiating table there is a dialogue and discussion in order to resolve the conflict amicably. Business personnel resolve standing issues by effective negotiation. This paper will analyze the roles of communication and personality in negotiation and how they contributed to or detracted from the purchase of vehicle negotiation. Three types of Negotiation There are three types of negotiations such as integrative process, distribution process or lose win process. The integrative process is both parties fit together and negotiate with one another to find out many new solutions to a particular problem and be able to agree to it. Integrative process is a win-win situation because both parties benefit from resolving the problem. The distributive process is when one party wants to win at the cost of the other party by inflicting maximum losses which then become popularly known as win-lose situation or the zero, sum situation. The third negotiation is the lose-win situation and this is where one party loses and the other wins. Communication and Personality Negotiation is a tool in keeping pricing at a competitive rate, to reduce expenses, and increase profit. Communication is the most important piece of the negotiation process and the personalities of the parties involved in negotiations play a large role in the way the agreements form. The most important factor can be the shape of the negotiation...
Words: 873 - Pages: 4
...1. Labour or Industrial Relations. The term labour relations, also known as industrial relations, refers to the system in which employers, workers and their representatives and, directly or indirectly, the government interact to set the ground rules for the governance of work relationships. It also describes a field of study dedicated to examining such relationships. The field is an outgrowth of the industrial revolution, whose excesses led to the emergence of trade unions to represent workers and to the development of collective labour relations. A labour or industrial relations system reflects the interaction between the main actors in it: the state, the employer (or employers or an employers’ association), trade unions and employees (who may participate or not in unions and other bodies affording workers’ representation). The phrases “labour relations” and “industrial relations” are also used in connection with various forms of workers’ participation; they can also encompass individual employment relationships between an employer and a worker under a written or implied contract of employment, although these are usually referred to as “employment relations”. There is considerable variation in the use of the terms, partly reflecting the evolving nature of the field over time and place. There is general agreement, however, that the field embraces collective bargaining, various forms of workers’ participation (such as works councils and joint health and safety committees) and mechanisms...
Words: 2478 - Pages: 10
...Internet and Global Negotiation Earlsworth John Baptiste MGT/445 Professor Sue Caruthers March 11, 2013 Internet and Global Negotiation Global negotiation has gotten easier as technology has become more advance. The key piece of technology that has helped is the Internet. The Internet has connected the world and has made it accessible to everyone. The following will discuss the business negotiation thru the Internet. The Internet has made global negotiations easier today compared to 50 years ago. If one was a small business trying to expand overseas, a member of the organization would have to travel there to begin the process of negotiation. According to Claude Cellich, "....the place of negotiation is no longer a sensitive issue Executives from small companies with limited travel budgets and restricted office space can use the Internet to bypass these impediments....(Cellich, C 2001). E-negotiation allows small businesses to compete with larger business on a more level playing field. Allowing them to offer their products and services at a completive price without spending extra capital on initial travel expenses. E-negotiations has made advantages. One example is resources are available during the negotiation process. "When negotiating from your office... You also have access to your files, staff and any other expertise you may require to carry out the discussions to your full satisfaction(Cellich, C 2001)." The more open, honest information...
Words: 788 - Pages: 4
...include some throwaway issues. What preparations do you need to make before the meeting? Preparation is first stage of negotiation process which starts with defining the key goals which means -what are the person’s expectations from the negotiation process? Also person involved in Negotiation process during preparation he should decide his or her BATNA- Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement. Identifying key issues in negotiation, setting priorities and developing support agreement for adopted position is also important parts of preparation before start negotiation with other party (Carrell, Heavrin, 2007). In order to perform an activity in a proper way we need to have some sort of preparation for it. Preparation is a key for a successful negotiation activity. For negotiation very first thing we need to understand is if there is anything to negotiate or not (If we were to sit down… (n.d.). For the preparation point of view before negotiations starts with my brother and sister I must have to look at the following things. BATNA Before the start of negotiation defining BATNA is important to make oneself in a strong position (Carrell, Heavrin, 2007). My BATNA would be to divide all the assets without dissolving them and make it as simple as possible. Identify key issues There are several key issues which we should go through during negotiation process. These issues are: 1-The main issue is that we have only 30 days to report our aunt’s attorney about the agreement...
Words: 1898 - Pages: 8
...Article Analysis By Edward Ryan MGT/445 In the world of negotiations there is no one decision that does not affect the lives of others in some way. Some groups of people may believe that our decisions are interdependent on each other. In a negotiation there never may be a best outcome for just one person, but if each side of the negotiation puts their best efforts forward then the entire process is usually always better for both sides because each side can usually succeed in getting more if they work together. Many cultures such as the Chinese culture believe in working together so that both sides of the negotiations more of what they need. According to Jehn, K. & Weigelt, K. this belief is not new, but just the method of how it is applied is new. Game theory is the process where each party in the process attempts to maximize their outcome with highest payoffs possible. Each side also accepts the situation that are at with their resistance points and each side plays by the known rules and that there is a level of trust between the two in that each side is offering the best that they can offer,(oregonstate.edu). The part of the process that is not new is how the Chinese have an emphasis on how they should know the situation that they are going in to. In other words it’s best to prepare because it is those that prepare by not only knowing how they will act but also how will the other side will act. The issue is that if you know only how you...
Words: 1154 - Pages: 5
...Negotiations Analysis Negotiation Analysis Paper Ivania Castaneda HR595- Keller School of Management March 2013 Introduction Buying a home is a complicated and time consuming process. The purchase of a home is just one of many examples of negotiations that happen in everyday life. It is one of the few places in life where some form of negotiation is the rule rather than the exception. Not all people are effective negotiators. It takes a keen understanding of the process in order to be good at it. This class has provided tools via the review of key concepts and methodology to allow even the not so adept negotiator to be better at negotiating. By informing yourself, preparing, and keeping an objective mind frame we can all use the tools taught in class to become more successful next time a negotiation situation arises. My paper will focus on integrative bargaining. Integrative bargaining (also called "interest-based bargaining," "win-win bargaining") is a negotiation strategy in which parties collaborate to find a "win-win" solution to their situation. This strategy focuses on developing mutually beneficial agreements based on the interests of both parties. This negotiation approach is important because it usually results in more of a positive outcome in contrast to distributive bargaining. The first step in integrative bargaining is identifying each side's interests. Although distributive bargaining is frequently seen as the opposite of integrative bargaining, the two...
Words: 2712 - Pages: 11
...Oluwole Adeoti | WELL DONE MADAM | NEGOTIATION TERM PAPER | WELL DONE MADAM | NEGOTIATION TERM PAPER | TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Intro Strategy and Tactics employed by Mrs. B ………………………………… 3 Negotiation Strategy …………………………………………………………….. 5 Types of Negotiation Strategy …………………………………………………… 5 Negotiation Tactics …………………………………………………………….. 5 Types of Negotiation tactics …………………………………………………… 6 Conclusion Reference Introduction Negotiation is a means through which differences are being settled. This usually involves communication between two or more people, parties who intend to reach a mutual beneficial outcome, have points of difference to resolve, trying to gain advantage for an individual or a group or get an outcome that will satisfy various interest. Through negotiation, compromise or agreement is been reached while avoiding argument and dispute and it is aimed to achieve most favorable result for the position that that the negotiator stands for. The case well done Madam is centered on negotiation between the protagonists Mrs B and the Airport police, how she used her negotiation skill to secure the release of her driver and the company car without been booked and paying the appropriately charges. Monday, Mrs B driver had wrongfully parked at the Airport entrance against his boss wish and was arrested for illegal parking by the Airport police. Mrs B noticing this from distance used negotiation process and tactical maneuvering to gain advantage...
Words: 1291 - Pages: 6
...Negotiation Skills Chapter 1 is entitled- The Nature of Negotiation it introduces us to the definition of the term Negotiation- “a form of decision making in which two or more parties talk with one another in an effort to resolve their opposing interests.” The Objectives are 1. To understand the definition of negotiation, the key elements of a negotiation process and the distinct types of Negotiation. 2 Explore how people use negotiation to manage situations of interdependence- that is, that they depend on each other for achieving their goals. 3 Consider how negotiation fit into the broader perspective of processes of managing conflict. 4 Gain an overview of the organization and content of this book. People negotiate all the time. Negotiations occur for several reasons: 1 to agree on how to share or divide a limited resource such as land, or property or time. 2 to create something new that neither party could do on his or her own and 3 to resolve problems or a dispute between the parties. People may recognize the need for negotiation but do poorly because they misunderstand the process or do not have good negotiating skills. For most people bargaining and negotiation mean the same thing, however in the text bargaining is used to describe the competitive, win-lose situation such as haggling over price at a yard sale, flea market or a car lot: Negotiation on the other hand is used to refer to win-win situations like those that occur where parties are trying to find a mutually...
Words: 594 - Pages: 3
...International Negotiation – Session 1 Brainstorm on Negotiation: * Communication * Compromise * Stress * Time * Outcome (the problem with it is that it’s difficult to predict.) * Expectations * Conditions * Terms * Culture * Threats * Promise * Context * Bribery * Convincing * Cooperation * Gender * Actors * Gender * Competition * Listening * Understanding * Trust * Preparation * Relationship * Short-term * Long-term * Debate * Stakes (en jeux) * Expertise * Power * Patience * Confidence * Flexibily * Credibility * Capacity to find solutions * Sensibility Negotiation defined = negotiation’ is a joint decision making process through which the parties accommodate their conflicting interest into a mutually acceptable settlement. Problem #1: joint decision-making process. Is not uni-natural, not you in your own, its you and your counter parts. Problem #2: conflicting interest: do we need a conflict when negotiating. We need a conflicting interest for a negotiating process. Sometimes people bring more conflicting issue into the table than the one in account. The problem with the interest is the evaluation with the interest; people will consider the conflict with getting out of it what they need. Your interests are different form the counter parts’. Problem #3: mutually acceptable settlement: what is the better possible...
Words: 820 - Pages: 4
...NEGOTIATING SKILLS The seat belts in school buses controversy Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Problem Statement 4 Analysis of the Negotiation 5 Recommendations and conclusion 5 Bibliography 7 Appendices 8 Simulation Case i Organizational Chart / members of the team ii Opening Letter iii Dates / # of Post made during negotions via CHSB iv Executive Summary The paper discusses the process of the negotiation between the Public Transport Authority and the Mosquito Mums. A negotiation where both parties had defined objectives focused on the seat belts controversy. The study also speaks about the constraints that arise during the negotiation. Both parties presented their proposal however the negotiation reached to no consensus agreement. Furthermore, both groups presented strong factual points but the PTA thinks that the Mosquito Mums still did not raised a strong reason for the petition. In addition, the study discussed about the importance of following the 7 phases in negotiation. Introduction Negotiation is defined as a process by which two or more parties attempt to resolve their opposing interest[1]. The interest in this case was provided as a simulation exercise that occurred during the period October 17th to 23rd 2014 on the conflict of needs - “The seat belts...
Words: 1440 - Pages: 6
...Running Head: NEGOTIATION STRATEGY ARTICLE ANALYSIS Negotiation Strategy Article Analysis Tony Robinson University of Phoenix MGT 445 August 15, 2012 Negotiation Strategy Article Analysis Introduction One experiences the act of negotiating at least once in a lifetime. It happens even in the smallest form of determining what is for dinner and can be as large as buying a home. The importance of understanding negotiation strategies will affect ones competitiveness within the market. Negotiations are made anywhere at any time for the most minute reasons. A negotiation strategy evaluates and analyzes two articles dealing with negotiating. The negotiating strategy also compares and contrast the strategies utilized and how those strategies can be apply within a work environment and the levels of its effectiveness. Article One The title of the first article is “Selling Water for China.” This article documents the actions of Acqua International. Aqua International is a company that sells drinkable water and is seeking to gain higher investments in China and wants to be the leading drinkable water supply in the Chinese market. In preparations of becoming the leading drinkable water supplier, Acqua International has to resolve some standing issues and negotiations. These issues include establishing water rates, consumer demands, annual water prices in regard to foreign exchanges, and revising the structure of the company. Determining water charges are inclusive on the last...
Words: 881 - Pages: 4
...MGM 316-1404B-08 International Business Communications Professor Robert Dunoskovic This task was originally submitted during MGM316-1403B-03 with Asefaw Indrias 1. One should understand the culture of each to make both parties feel more comfortable when negotiations take place. Understanding the culture will give one the edge to better negotiation and also give you the insight as to what is acceptable and what is not. Although minor mistakes are permissible misunderstandings may lead to dismissal of negotiations. One should be aware of the attire that needs to be worn for each country. For example, suits that are of the dark nature are acceptable in Japan whereas in China a more subtle look for casual look is appropriate. The discussion of profits is not a common practice of these countries. As a matter of fact they don’t discuss their company’s profits at all in negotiations. One should understand that these countries rely heavily on respect and making people feel comfortable and showing appreciation. One must understand what each action of the business people in these countries mean and how to handle each one or what to do in each case. One must understand the way each country communicates and what is an acceptable form of communication and what is not an acceptable practice, when to use non-verbal communication and when not to. 2. The Asian countries view contracts as just an agreement between two companies. In Japan, the contracts are very detailed but in...
Words: 1066 - Pages: 5
...referred to as “win-win” bargaining or distributive bargaining as well known as “win-lose” bargaining. Negotiator knows that there are too many situational and monetary variables for a single strategy to work in this case and often times the negotiator needs to utilize both approaches to effectively conduct negotiations. In this paper I will provide and explain an appropriate approach what situation the negotiator would utilize the technique. Defining Integrative and Distributive Bargaining There are two common approaches to any negotiation situation: distributive and integrative. Each is useful in specific contexts, and the same negotiator may utilize either or both strategies depending upon their desired goal. The largest difference between the two styles is the circumstance in which they are used. Often when we negotiation a one-time situation or purchase we will utilize a distributive bargaining approach and try to gain the best price or outcome where “we” are the winner and those we are negotiating with are the “losers” In these situations we rarely interact with the opposing party on a regular or future basis and are seeking the best possible outcome for this specific negotiation without interest in building a long-term relationship. In contrast, an integrative bargaining situation occurs when it is possible to produce a greater outcome together than either could reach on...
Words: 2238 - Pages: 9
...critical supplier relationships. These practices represent a reasonably comprehensive (though certainly not exhaustive) approach to maximizing value in important supplier relationships. While not a recipe for guaranteed success, these practices comprise a roadmap for systematically negotiating and managing key supplier relationships more effectively. Today’s sourcing and procurement professionals face a multitude of negotiation challenges: from internal negotiations with business units around sourcing strategies; to negotiating agreements with single and sole source suppliers; to ongoing negotiations over individual statements of work, change orders, issues of scope, and the like. This excerpt describes the four best practices related to negotiation and offers some practical ideals about how to implement them. About the study The study was based on data collected from sourcing and supply chain executives at more than 100 companies about relationship management practices with their key suppliers, across six fundamental areas: Evaluation and Selection Negotiation Post-Deal Relationship Management Termination Performance Monitoring Portfolio Governance and Management One hundred fifteen survey respondents were asked to answer scaled questions on specific practices, as well as open-ended questions about their company’s overall approach to supplier relationship management. The bulk of the study details specific findings about each practice, including a...
Words: 8901 - Pages: 36
...In an international business there has to be at least 2 parties, from different countries, negotiating a business deal. There are 2 factors in the international negotiation. The environmental context – this Includes environmental forces that neither negotiator controls that influence the negotiation The immediate context – this Includes factors over which negotiators appear to have some control The following diagram below shows the context of international negotiations. According to the above diagram, the 6 factors in the environmental context that makes international negotiation different from the national are: (1) Political and legal pluralism Firms from different countries work with different legal and political systems. There are large concerns about the political risks. (2) International economics The value of foreign currencies which fluctuates from time to time; this factor needs to be negotiated. (3) Foreign governments and bureaucracies The level of governmental meddling in business in many nations is wide-ranging. In countries firms are free from government regulations while in others they are not. Parties need to know whether the governments should be included in their negotiations or not. (4) Instability Instability can be caused due to lack of resources (electricity/computers), shortages of other goods and services (water, transportation and proper food) and political instability (government policies). (5) Ideology & Culture ...
Words: 521 - Pages: 3
