Free Essay

Net Neutrality

In: Computers and Technology

Submitted By NZAMBA
Words 2041
Pages 9
Student Name
Instructor
Course
7th October 2015
Net Neutrality
The purpose of this research paper is to discuss how net-neutrality regulations will hinder competition and innovative growth. The research paper starts with an introduction of net neutrality then proceeds to the main argument of the topic. The paper will examine how net neutrality regulations have posed threats to internet use while reviewing some the work done different scholars. At the end of this part, an argument will be presented to show how threat to internet use will hinder competition and innovation growth. To strengthen the argument and stand of this paper, the paper will also examine the importance of net neutrality in businesses and communities which are core for development and show how this regulations will hinder innovation and competition to businesses and communities due to lack of information. The paper shall close with a conclusion part that will sum up the ideas discussed in the paper and bring to light how net neutrality will hinder competition and innovation.
A research done by Bauer, Johannes, and Woohyun on "Regulation and innovation in Telecommunications" revealed that more than any other innovation or invention of our time, the Internet has opened potential outcomes we could barely imagine of a generation ago (Bauer 9). The research provided major reasons we have seen such extraordinary development and advancement as most Internet providers have treated Internet traffic in an equal manner. That is the principle known as "net neutrality" and it says that a business person's fledging organization ought to have the same opportunity to succeed as other established enterprises, and that entry to a secondary school student’s online journal shouldn't be unreasonably backed off to clear a way for advertisers with more money.
In simpler terms, Net neutrality refers to the thought/idea that all Internet data should be treated equally by the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) (Ganley 455). Ganley in his research further noted that for most part of the internet history, the Internet Service Providers did not differentiate between the various content types that flow via the networks, may it be in web pages, emails or any other form of information. In the 1990s and early 2000s, few Internet Service Providers who tried to block certain forms of data faced opposition from the consumers, regulators, and technological companies. With a rise in bandwidth-heavy services, for example, Netflix, the Internet Service Providers have increasingly sought to sell this bandwidth or the fast lanes to the companies that are willing to pay for it.
Firstly, net neutrality will hinder competition and innovation based on the threats it has posed to the internet. According to a research that was conducted by Faulhaber and Gerald on "Economics of net neutrality” it was noted that net neutrality will serve an important role in steering competition in all spheres of the economy but however, having regulation that aim at empowering providers will bar competition to factors of production thereto bringing down growth ( Faulhaber 57). Craig Aaron a member of the pro-regulation group Free Press contended that exclusive deals among the providers could turn into the norm, with AT&T only bringing you Netflix, while Time Warner Cable is the sole source for YouTube (Economides 209). He sees security and decision making heading towards the store of history, saying it will not be long before the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) obliges one to interface through their list of affirmed gadgets and after that uses those gadgets to watch them literally. Craig says that this is the end of the internet. Michael Weinberg of the support group Public Knowledge correspondingly refers to a parade of horribles, including corrupted administration, higher expenses, and less advancement, because of higher charges and limited choices Supporters of regulation, however, have been making such predictions for quite a long time, and they never seemed to come true.
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are keener on gaining clients than pushing them away. There has been only one recorded situation where an Internet Service Providers (ISPs) plainly endeavored to block Internet content for its benefit. In most cases, the imagined outrages of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) attacking adversaries and removing ruinous expenses are only imagined. Surely, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) have the specialized ability to block or hinder certain services and sites but however, they are not interesting at all. Numerous organizations, including Google, a long-lasting supporter of neutrality regulation have the same capacities. Blocking sites or obstructing disfavored services would rapidly seem like asking clients to leave for good to another provider. According to a research that was conducted by (Economides 9) it was established that regulating net neutrality will cause discrimination and mishandling of market via the internet and as result this would bring down competition in the market as well as innovations that are seen as key promoters of economy growth.

Secondly, regulating Net Neutrality will hinder investments and innovation that are paramount for growth. According to a research that was done by Hahn, Robert, and Scott Wall on "The economics of net neutrality” it was established that the present arrangement of administrative self-control, motivations and opportunities have prompted an eminent record of investment and innovation in the system that has empowered, encouraged and increased the worth at the edge for new services, applications and gadgets/devices with significantly increased usefulness and appropriation. In fact, a large number of the developments at the edge reflect venture and business model use of services initially presented by in the center network. (Hahn 37). The research concluded that regulation of net neutrality will cause imbalance between innovation, investment and internet ecosystem.
A research done by Mike on Net Neutrality which examined the Impact on the Consumer and Economic Growth further supported this claims by noting that the inconvenience of common carrier type regulations on the network providers would lessen incentives and chances to continue with investment and innovation at the center, in this manner affecting the overflow of benefits to the edge (Mike 7). New limitations on broadband network providers would lead to increase in danger and uncertainty, reduce prospects for development, and undermine network administrators' incentives and chances to adjust to rapidly changing specialized and economic conditions in the Internet Ecosystem. Chris in his research also noted that, the Internet regulations would undermine the capacity of new opponents to enter and effectively challenge predominant edge providers that have established market power and a current national infrastructure (Chris 13). He supported his claims by noting that net neutrality regulations would create barriers to entry by securing huge edge providers to the detriment of would-be opponents. Thus, strategies that reduce the network venture would likewise hinder innovation in the Internet Ecosystem.
In essence, as noted above, net neutrality Internet will reduce the welfare of the customer welfare. Numerous financial analysts trust that competitive concerns including the Internet's openness are better tended to through a case-by-case arbitration and antitrust implementation, not ex risk or prescriptive regulations, and that Internet net neutrality would diminish customer welfare, innovation, and investment. Subsidizing content suppliers at the cost of the expense suppliers’ leaves buyers in a bad condition, in a few circumstances, the absolute surplus could increase net neutrality. The losses that are sustained by the customers and the platform operators under net neutrality exceed any gains appreciated by content providers as the benefit proportion is adjusted to less exactly impossible levels, which prompts deadweight loss under the net neutrality. Consumers would be more terrible off with net neutrality (Becker, 501).
Thirdly, examining the importance of net neutrality to businesses, numerous researchers have found that, regulation of net neutrality will negatively impact business growth. Wallsten in his research noted that Net Neutrality is vital for small entrepreneurs, new businesses and large business, who depend on the open Internet to launch their organizations, create a business sector, publicize their items and services, and disperse their products to clients (Wallsten 34). He further suggests that we require the open Internet to foster the growth of jobs or investment, competition, and innovation.
Pasquale further supports these claims in his research "Beyond Innovation and Competition” that aimed at determining the Need for Qualified Transparency in Internet Intermediaries. He noted that Net neutrality brings down the barriers of entry for business people, new companies, and small organizations by guaranteeing the Web is a reasonable and level playing field. It is the result of Net Neutrality that small organizations and the entrepreneurs have possessed the capacity to flourish with the Internet. They utilize the Internet to reach new clients and showcase their products, applications and administrations (Pasquale 47). No organization ought to have the capacity to interfere with this open commercial center. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are by definition the guards to the Internet, and without Net Neutrality, they would grab every possible chance to benefit from that gatekeeper control. Without Net Neutrality, the next Google could never get off the ground.

Lastly, Net Neutrality has been found to be paramount to the local communities. Most researchers note that regulation of net neutrality will block these benefits to the local communities. Net neutrality allows diverse communities to tell their particular stories and to sort out for racial and social equity. The standard media have failed to permit minorities to represent themselves. What is more, on account of financial disparity and runaway media consolidation, ethnic minorities own only a small number of broadcast stations. The absence of various possessions is an essential motivation behind why the media have gotten away with portraying groups of color stereotypically. The regulating Net Neutrality gives underestimated voices chances to be heard. Without Net Neutrality, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) could block unpopular discourse and also prevent protester voices from talking openly on the web. Without Net Neutrality, ethnic minorities would lose a crucial platform. Also, without Net Neutrality, a huge number of small organizations owned by non-white individuals would not have the ability to go compete with the bigger enterprises on the web, which would further extend the financial disparity in our country's most powerless group (Ganley, 468).

Conclusion
In summary, net neutrality regulations according to most researchers would hinder network innovation and development, and hinder competition. As discussed in this paper, regulation of net neutrality has much negativity to competition and innovation for economic growth in general. Firstly, as discuss, these regulation will interfere with internet which is seen as a primary promoter of competition and innovation as it easy to use. This will further slow down the rates of innovations and inventions as businesses growth will be affected as well as communities who are seen as the primary drivers of competition and innovations. Therefore, it is true that regulation of net neutrality will hinder competition and innovation in growth.

Works Cited
Bauer, Johannes M., and Woohyun Shim. "Regulation and innovation in Telecommunications."
Quello Center for Telecommunications Management and Law, Working Paper (2012): 01-12.
Becker, Gary S., Dennis W. Carlton, and Hal S. Sider. "Net neutrality and consumer welfare."
Journal of Competition Law and Economics 6.3 (2010): 497-519.
Chris,M and Bret, S. “Net Neutrality, Investment & Jobs: Assessing the potential Impacts of the
FCC’s Proposed Net Neutrality Rules on the Broadband Ecosystem” (2010):5-13; Retrieved from: http://www.onecommunity.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Davidson-Swanson-NN-Economic-Impact-Paper-FINAL.pdf.
Economides, Nicholas. "Net neutrality, non-discrimination and digital distribution of content through the internet." ISJLP 4 (2008): 209.
Faulhaber, Gerald R. "Economics of net neutrality: A review." Communications & Convergence
Review 3.1 (2011): 53-64.
Ganley, Paul, and Ben Allgrove. "Net neutrality: A user's guide." Computer Law & Security
Review 22.6 (2006): 454-463.
Hahn, Robert W., and Scott Wallsten. "The economics of net neutrality." The Economists' Voice
3.6 (2006).
Mike Jude.”Net Neutrality: Impact on the Consumer and Economic Growth” Consumer
Communication Services (CCS) 4.13(2010): 4-24; Retrieved from: http://internetinnovation.org/files/special-reports/Impact_of_Net_Neutrality_on_Consumers_and_Economic_Growth.pdf.
Pasquale, Frank A. "Beyond Innovation and Competition: The Need for Qualified Transparency in Internet Intermediaries." Available at SSRN 1686043 (2010).
Wallsten, Scott, and Stephanie Hausladen. "Net neutrality, unbundling, and their effects on international investment in next-generation networks." Review of Network Economics 8.1 (2009).

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...sites, and the toll could turn away any website they like. Internet service providers are trying to push for this kind of internet, a money based internet where they don’t have to show any competitors websites at all. This doesn't sound like a good thing for the internet we know and love. In order to protect the fundamental principle that the internet was based on, and small web-based companies, net neutrality Must be protected and preserved. To understand why Net Neutrality must be preserved first you have to understand it, the economics of it, the arguments against the system, and the effect its change would have on small web-based companies. Net Neutrality can be defined very simply, that all websites are treated equally and distributed to the consumer or business equally. According to Tim wu, a professor at Columbia law School, he says on his personal website article Network Neutrality FAQ “The idea is that a maximally useful public information network aspires to treat all content, sites, and platforms equally.” What he is saying here is that basic concept of Net Neutrality is that no matter what provider, or platform (computer, tablet, or phone e.t.c) all content must be treated with equal delivery privileges. In other words, large companies can’t buy the top internet delivery speeds, leaving small web-based companies in the dust. However the United states Government has introduced bills, specifically The Internet Preservation Act, that do allow for Q.O.S......

Words: 2518 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...you are one of India’s active netizens, it is unlikely that the words Net Neutrality have escaped your daily dose of social media updates and news. The debate, which gained pace post AIB’s video on the topic and news of the Airtel Zero programme, has seen some of the biggest names in the Internet and media industries give their take on the issue. More importantly, last month India’s telecom regulator TRAI came out with a consultation paper on the growth of Over-the-top (OTT) players like WhatsApp or Skype and is looking at exploring a regulatory framework for these apps. In essence, Net Neutrality implies that all Internet data pack should be treated equally, that there should be no fast or slow lanes for Internet, or that users should pay differently for accessing some websites. While online activists and even big Internet companies in India like ClearTrip, Flipkart, have come out to support Net Neutrality, the debate isn’t really as simple when it comes to India. He says the telecos’ argument about loss revenue due to rise of OTT’s isn’t a legitimate one but adds that instead of going for more regulation TRAI can look to reduce some differential regulations for telecos to make things easier for them. There’s also a growing belief that TRAI hasn’t acted fairly when it comes to its paper on OTTs. The Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) has slammed TRAI saying OTTs are already regulated and governed by the IT Act. A statement issued by IAMAI President Subho......

Words: 1110 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...Browse Essays/Technology Net Neutrality This essay Net Neutrality is available for you on Essays24.com! Search Term Papers, College Essay Examples and Free Essays on Essays24.com - full papers database. Autor: anton • November 11, 2010 • 680 Words (3 Pages) • 326 Views Page 1 of 3 As someone who has had some sort of web presence for over ten years , I am completely and unequivocally in favor of net neutrality. Google defines net neutrality as "the principle that Internet users should be in control of what content they view and what applications they use on the Internet. " What net neutrality means to me, is that the content I have to share (however mundane it may be) has an equal opportunity of reaching any Internet user as any other content on any other web site. There are some interesting videos on You Tube discussing this topic most notably Robin Miller's video which talks about how net neutrality benefits individuals like you and me. However, the threat to net neutrality impacts everyone--small businesses, large businesses, and individuals . If we lose the battle to maintain net neutrality it could stifle competition amongst businesses online with the only companies remaining being the ones who can afford to pay premiums to broadband service providers for prioritization. Technologies like packet shaping (not necessarily a bad technology depending on what it is used for) are paving the way for such discrimination. Small businesses will find it more difficult to......

Words: 2945 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...The idea of net neutrality has been around since the invention of the telegram and telephone system. This idea of neutrality led to the passage of the Communications Act of 1934 which regulates telecommunications by prohibiting preferential treatment and unfair consumer costs (The Communications Act of 1934). However, the term “net neutrality” as it pertains to the internet was first used by Tim Wu in 2003 in his article “Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination” (Wu, 2003). In March of 2005, the concept became more well known when the internet service provider (ISP) Madison River Communications was caught blocking all of its subscribers from using a voice over internet protocol (VoIP) service called Vonage. The company blocked this service because their own telecommunications service was competing against Vonage’s lower prices, made possible by utilizing customers’ internet connections instead of telephone lines (Ante & Crockett, 2005). Vonage made a complaint to the FCC, and Madison River Communications had to pay a $15,000 fine (Regan, 2005). Later in 2005, the FCC released an internet policy statement, which outlined support for an early version of net neutrality. This statement was meant to “encourage broadband deployment and preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet” by adopting the following principles: • allowing consumers access to the lawful internet content of their choice, • allowing consumers access to run......

Words: 2517 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Net Neutrality

...Net Neutrality Internet users are under threat by the rules and regulations demanded by Internet service providers. The implication of this act is the deprivation of our right to free internet access. Hereafter, FCC Tom Wheeler fought back by releasing a plan to defend net neutrality and preserve our rights. Net Neutrality gives Internet users the freedom to access and enjoy any kind of content on the web and protect free speech without any restrictions or limitations. It provides a platform for innovative ideas, which the internet thrives of. This guiding principle is supported by the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Open Internet Order, which was specifically issued to prevent Internet Service Providers (ISP) from blocking or impeding user’s connections to online content. In defense, without the Net Neutrality, Internet Service Providers would be able to strategize new ways to charge users more for access and services, which would hinder online communication. Without Net Neutrality, Internet Service Providers would be allowed to censor content and speech that does not cater to their taste, reject applications that is in competition with their own offerings and prioritize Web traffic. This paper will be written in the defense of net neutrality, in terms of importance for business and communities of color, etc., and our right to free internet access on behalf of all Internet users. There are a number of reasons why net neutrality is important to us. Net neutrality...

Words: 1011 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...Are you in favor of legislation enforcing network neutrality? Why or why not? I am in favor of legislation enforcing network neutrality. As stated in the first CNET news video, without legislation broadband providers would be able to block or slow down access to certain applications or websites on the internet and it would essentially turn into what we see our cable companies in the US doing. I cannot tolerate the way our cable companies operate in the US and refuse to pay for such a service. Cable providers have turned into a closed system where they control or have a say in all of the content that you view. Without net neutrality, internet service providers would be able to charge excess fees to larger companies that require more data use and would essentially hurt the customer. It would hurt the customer because with these larger companies like Netflix and Amazon having to pay excess fees, they would be forced to put the burden of those fees on us, the customers. No net neutrality will hurt future online companies trying to emerge into successful businesses. Online businesses will become scarce due to high barriers being introduced by internet service providers. This is not something I want to see happen. I personally do a lot of business online. Selling products on eBay, purchasing products from other websites. One of the few fears I do have about this new net neutrality bills is how it will affect the way the internet operates down the road. With the internet......

Words: 497 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...Net Neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites. The internet was all new territory so it was not properly regulated when the Internet was invented. The providers abused the system and would prioritize larger businesses over the smaller businesses. In a lot of people’s eyes, they were bordering on unethical business practices. These net neutrality problems, ironically, lead to an uprising on the internet and thousands of people started to recognize the inconsistencies in the fine print. This was mainly brought on by what happened to Netflix. In order to force Netflix to buy a more expensive service, Comcast slowed down the speeds for Netflix customers by an incredible amount. I have Comcast and have experienced these slowed speeds first hand. At one point my videos spent more time buffering then the video lasted. This uproar on the internet lead to the Obama administration approving very strong net neutrality rules. President Obama even thanked Reddit, the self-proclaimed “Front Page of the Internet”, for its community activism on the issue. However, even though the rules have been approved, Telecom and many cable companies are challenging the Obama Administration’s actions in court. This issue is far from Net Neutrality can be good for a business in a lot of ways. For example, a small stock broking firm that has......

Words: 562 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...Current policies and practices pertaining to “net neutrality” in the Canadian context. Why or Why not is “net neutrality” an important principle? Orlando Desmond D’Souza 103455783 Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'annibale Introduction to Media and Society: 40-101-01 Tuesday October 25, 2011 Net Neutrality also known as Network Neutrality is one of the most highly debated topic of the century. The debate is fundamentally based on the future of the Internet and the role it would play in the society. It has received a great deal of attention from various people including telecommunication experts, certain political representatives as well as the press. It mainly states that Internet Service providers (ISP’s) must treat all data sources equally. In other words it means that the users of the internet must have the freedom to access the internet without any restrictions put upon them by the ISP’s. The term ‘net neutrality’ is defined in a number of ways by different communities, companies and individuals. Barratt and Shade stressed upon another condition that; there are no means by which centralized mechanisms can be used to control the Internet. Moreover Moll and Shade argued that the corporations that own networks have no control of the information that runs through them (Moll & Shade, 2008: VIII). Many organizations and companies try to use it in various forms. There are several examples on net neutrality with respect to Canada with one of them being the Telus issue....

Words: 1109 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...Are you for or against Net Neutrality? I am in favor of Net Neutrality. I believe in Net Neutrality and the freedom of speech on the Internet. Content within a site should be free to the public. By protecting open Internet, it will insure that the Internet is not own by only a hand full of key players in the industry like Google, Verizon, Comcast dominating the Internet. What are your thoughts concerning this? My major concern about net neutrality is that few key companies would dominate the Internet. It might means pushing small companies out of business due to key players in the industry would take control over the cost of Internet, speed of the Internet, and even take control of access to information over the Internet. Internet became a part of our lives and in past 10 years most of our offline activities like banking, shopping, and professional recruitment are following the trends and move to the online world. For better or for worse, the Internet is changing the way we are evolving. At “The Future of the Internet” public hearing, FCC Commissioner Mignon L. Clyburn said “New and innovative media companies are constantly starting-up today, citizen journalism is on the rise, blogs have an increasing influence on public discourse, and media providers from broadcast networks to newspapers are shifting their strategies online. For these reasons and more, I say without hesitation, that an open Internet is indeed the great equalizer. It enables......

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Mis Net Neutrality

...Interactive Session: Organizations: Should Network Neutrality Continue?Case Study Questions:1. What is network neutrality? Why has the Internet operated under net neutralityup to this point in time?  Network neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers must allow customers equalaccess to content and applications regardless of the source or nature of the content.Presently the Internet is indeed neutral: all Internet traffic is treated equally on a first-come, first-serve basis by Internet backbone owners. The Internet is neutral because itwas built on phone lines, which are subject to ‘common carriage’ laws. These lawsrequire phone companies to treat all calls and customers equally. They cannot offer extra benefits to customers willing to pay higher premiums for faster or clearer calls, a modelknows as tiered service. 2. Who’s in favor of network neutrality? Who’s opposed? Why? Those in favor of network neutrality include organizations like MoveOn.org, theChristian Coalition, the American Library Association, every major consumer group,many bloggers and small businesses, and some large Internet companies like Google andAmazon. Some members of the U.S. Congress also support network neutrality. Vint Cerf,a co-inventor of the Internet Protocol also favors network neutrality saying that variableaccess to content would detract from the Internet’s continued ability to thrive. This groupargues that the risk of censorship increases when network operators can selectively...

Words: 417 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

What Is Net Neutrality?

...Over the last decade, net neutrality has increasingly made its way into public discourse: politicians on Capitol Hill have battled over it, corporations have worked to curb it and public interest advocates have fought to preserve it. In September, the fight to keep the Internet free and open found its way to the DC’s Circuit Court of Appeals, where Verizon is attempting to overturn the Federal Communications Commission’s current net neutrality regulations. Verizon vs. FCC , which could be decided as soon as this month, is the latest and arguably most important battle to protect the Internet from censorship and discrimination. But what is net neutrality? And what could this case mean for the future of the Internet? We’ve put together this explainer to catch you up. What is net neutrality? Network neutrality, or net neutrality, is a term first coined by technology policy scholar Tim Wu to describe the preservation of online innovation by prohibiting companies from discriminating against some users and content, or prioritizing some content over others. It guarantees a level playing field in which Internet users do not have to pay Internet service providers more for better access to online content, and content generators do not have to pay additional fees to ensure users can access their websites or apps. By the way, what is an Internet service provider? An Internet service provider, or ISP, is a company or organization that sells you access to the Internet....

Words: 2228 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

...One of the most polarizing debates of 2017 was Net Neutrality, more specifically, the repealing of net neutrality. The term “net neutrality” may not have been around since the start of the internet and telephone service providers preceding them but the concept has always been there. The basic premise behind net neutrality is that it is a means to ensure that the internet is for the common good of the people ensuring freedom to browse the web however the consumer pleases. The general consensus for the majority of United States citizens is that net neutrality benefits them. It is believed that without net neutrality, that big ISPs will now be free to please stockholders by driving up profits through being able to charge the customer for the specific...

Words: 1226 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Net Neutrality - Case Study

...Case Study 5: Net Neutrality Q2. Do some Internet research to identify the current status of Net Neutrality legislation being considered by Congress. Briefly summarize the content of the legislation. Net Neutrality in the United States has been an increasingly heated issue since the Internet blossomed. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has power to regulate "interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories" (FCC, n.d.). It would, therefore, seem a natural fit to include the Internet as another means of regulated communication. Currently, FCC regulations shape Net Neutrality more than laws. However, the FCC has recently been deemed by the court to lack the authority to enforce Net Neutrality. It's Open Internet Order, a set of policies prohibiting the blocking or charging of services by ISPs, was largely struck down in early 2014 in the ruling of Verizon v. Federal Communications Commission (Weil, 2014). The reasoning of the court was that the FCC cannot regulate the broadband providers because they are defined as data services, not telecommunication services. Since that ruling, the FCC has been considering policies involving tiered Internet access, but has yet to act. Since the court struck down FCC rule of network neutrality, there have been several attempts to enact laws regarding Net Neutrality. These include: • S. 1981, The Open Internet......

Words: 1237 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Net Neutrality

... The Internet has come a long way since being brought up around the world. Millions of people access the internet for many uses such as communicating with friends and family, accessing vital information, paying bills, online shopping, and the list goes on and on. But there is now one phenomenon that many people are unaware of, net neutrality. Net neutrality is the paradigm where ISP providers and governments restrict the access from certain Internet web sites to the public. Web sites should be open to everybody browsing on the Internet and not be restricted. We can look in depth to this dilemma by using ethical theories to help us out. When it comes to utilitarian position regarding net neutrality, many sites should be restricted because it is the greatest good for the greatest number of people. But when it comes to the deontologist position regarding net neutrality all sites should be able to be accessed with no restrictions because it should adhere to the obligations and duties of ISP providers and governments (Boulos, 2008). Utilitarian ethics has the basis to get the greatest good for the greatest number of people. When it comes to net neutrality this means blocking or restricting many web sites to the millions of users. These decisions are made by ISP providers and by governments. For example Verizon has been paying money to ISP companies to make their bandwidth larger so it could be faster than other competing companies, giving them the upper hand (Bloomberg News,......

Words: 963 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...Johnny Everly Ms. Phillips Composition II 03/14/2011 The Battle for Neutrality The internet today is a global system of interconnected networks that serves billions of people worldwide. The internet is one of the most popular means for communication and information in the twenty-first century all over the world. Whether the internet is accessed from an office location, a home residence, a school, or even a mobile phone there is a connection being made with an Internet Service Provider (ISP). An Internet Service Provider maintains the infrastructure that allows different devices to be connected to networks that make the internet. As of today all information or “packets” are treated equally; and consumers pay for the connectivity of the interne. Some consumers pay for a faster connection rate, but do not get faster delivery for a specific type of content just faster for all types of information. This is why the internet today is vastly growing as one of the most popular innovations on the planet, all made possible by Net Neutrality. The argument that is going on states; that service providers can charge websites a fee for faster data transmission then others. Net neutrality states consumers should have access to lawful internet content; run applications and services of their choice; use equipment of their choice without interference from the provider. In the argument on net neutrality it is stated that people should have access to lawful internet at any time. As it...

Words: 829 - Pages: 4