No comprehensive cyber security legislation, No agreement and surely no compromise as opposition among the senate lead democrats and republicans have yet found a common ground, after five years of discussions are worthless discourse about concerns that not only affects the private sector, but have grown to become the world epidemic – the danger of cyberspace. This article revealed how two governments’ parties the republicans and democrats wrestle with the lack of ability to agree on what kind of government’s liability protection is appropriate. The republicans feel as though a” broad liability protection” for the private sector would be suitable, because the board liability protection would cover all cyber security related incidents be it internal and external and interrelated incidents conspire outside the scope of the cyberspace.
On the other hand, the democrats argue that a” targeted liability protection” is adequate and that it would serve for the sole purpose only to deal with specific and sufficient cyber threats only and sharing cyber threat information. Also, the democrats’ suspicion is that the potential for harm is too likely and others reasonable doubts are obvious to conspire on other matters. Furthermore, according to the administration “this broad liability protection not only removes a strong incentive to improving cyber security, it also potentially undermines our nation's economic, national security, and public safety interests,” The ranking republican on the committee – Tom Coburn replied “there’s an assumption in the government that businesspeople are going to be something wrong and not something right” his comments came after the fact about democrats potential allegations that the board liability protection misuse. While the republicans still continued the battle to pursue for the board liability protection, neither parties have not realized that time is of the most important.