New Heritage Doll

In: Business and Management

Submitted By heather208
Words 1848
Pages 8
New Heritage Doll Company: Capital Budgeting

MGT 6060
20 September 2011

Overview
Two business proposals from the Production division of the New Heritage Doll Company are being considered for submission to the capital budgeting committee. Only one proposal will be submitted. The proposals are: Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion and Design Your Own Doll.
A systematic process will be used to determine which proposal to recommend. Criteria Include:
1. Comparison of the business cases
2. NPV analysis
3. IRR and payback period analysis
4. Analysis of additional information
5. Recommendation
Comparison of the Business Cases
Most Compelling Business Case Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion
Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion is the the most compelling opportunity. This initial recommendation is based solely on a qualitative comparison of the cases and the financial exhibits provided by the brand managers. A SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, & Threat) analysis was used to aid the decision process. See Tables 1 & 2 for SWOT analysis.
Benefits of the Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion:
* Success of the original line of business
* Utilization of the businesses existing strengths
* Long term ability for the product to stay up to date and drive business
Concerns for the Design Your Own Doll:
* High risk associated with developing a proprietary software system
* Complexity of manufacturing
* High break-even sales volume
Overview Business Case 1 – Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion
The proposal for the Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion is to expand the line, based on the success and popularity of the existing product line, to include products for all four seasons. The current product includes a doll and two sets of matching warm weather clothing for child and doll. See Table 1 for SWOT…...

Similar Documents

New Heritage Doll

...New Heritage Doll Company: Capital Budgeting MGT 6060 20 September 2011 Overview Two business proposals from the Production division of the New Heritage Doll Company are being considered for submission to the capital budgeting committee. Only one proposal will be submitted. The proposals are: Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion and Design Your Own Doll. A systematic process will be used to determine which proposal to recommend. Criteria Include: 1. Comparison of the business cases 2. NPV analysis 3. IRR and payback period analysis 4. Analysis of additional information 5. Recommendation Comparison of the Business Cases Most Compelling Business Case Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion is the the most compelling opportunity. This initial recommendation is based solely on a qualitative comparison of the cases and the financial exhibits provided by the brand managers. A SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, & Threat) analysis was used to aid the decision process. See Tables 1 & 2 for SWOT analysis. Benefits of the Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion: * Success of the original line of business * Utilization of the businesses existing strengths * Long term ability for the product to stay up to date and drive business Concerns for the Design Your Own Doll: * High risk associated with developing a proprietary software system * Complexity of manufacturing * High break-even...

Words: 1848 - Pages: 8

New Heritage

...The New Heritage Doll Company is founded in 1985 and has long history. The management of company pay attention to the doll developing girls’ the imagination and self-image. The company tends to create some new products to dominate the market. The U.S. retail sales of dolls totaled $3.1 billion in 2008 while the New Heritage Doll Company’s revenue approximately $245 million of revenue, owning less than 10% of market share. There is good reason to believe that the New Heritage Doll Company has a potential future. Based on this assumption, we assume the New Heritage Doll Company’s g (internal growth rate) is not less than 3%(average growth of U.S. dolls market). The data total case flow of 2021 in Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2 we provided are base on the assumption that the projects will be operated continuity whit a g = 3%. NPV , IRR & PI PV of Total CF | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Match My Doll Clothing | (3,020) | (501) | 145 | 533 | 391 | 390 | 389 | 387 | 386 | 384 | 383 | 6,747 | Design Your own Doll | (5,331) | (923) | 285 | (242) | (867) | 727 | 705 | 689 | 674 | 659 | 645 | 11,341 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The initial expenditures of project Design Your own Doll will is more and the more total cash flow will be provided. We can find that * the NPV of Match My Doll Clothing = 6,615 the NPV of Design Your own Doll = 8,363 The project Design Your own Doll will...

Words: 750 - Pages: 3

New Heritage Doll

...12-11-30 Fi nance S i ul i C apialB udgetng m aton: t i Finance Simulation: Capital Budgeting prepare dashboard I/S and B/S cashflow statement analyze financial analysis project details decide historical financials project updates 2013 'Design Your Own Doll' : Project costs in the first year were as budgeted but were not sufficient to get the assembly equipment and related software working properly. Additional outlays are required to complete the project, and the launch is accordingly delayed. Young Authors Book Series 'Best of Girls' books were an immediate success with the targeted demographic. Both revenue and profit levels exceeded expectations. 2012 EDI Supplier Software System The new system performed better than expected with regard to SG&A and working capital savings. Expansion to England Boutique sales were stronger than expected, due in large part to the success of 'Dolls of the World' in Europe. Bookstore Café and Writers' Club Initial revenues from the initiative were somewhat higher than expected, but this was offset by lower gross margins resulting from a somewhat different product mix than anticipated. Toddlers Music CD Series Initial revenues from Toddler CDs were twice as large as anticipated. 2011 Replace Assembly Equipment at Sacramento Facility The new machinery performed as expected. 'Match My Doll' Clothing Line, Expansion of Concept The expanded clothing line benefited from the strong performance of the initial 'Match My Doll' line...

Words: 562 - Pages: 3

New Heritage

...Asg 1 Ch 1-7 The majority of this assignment involves the case New Heritage Doll Company: Capital Budgeting. Please download from website listed in the syllabus. 1) Compare and contrast the business case for each of the two projects being considered. Which do you regard as a more compelling investment from a strategic view? 2) Using the projections given compute the NPV for each project. Create a data table comparing the NPV for each of the discount rates (low, medium, high risk). Which project creates more value? Create a data table comparing the NPV at different terminal growth rates (from 0% to 6% in .5% increments) 3) Compute the IRR of each project. How should these projections effect the deliberations? How does IRR compare to NPV as a tool for evaluating projects? When and how should it be used? 4) Why does the case give three different costs of capital? How do companies determine their cost of capital? Explain why a company may have a company wide cost of capital and a different cost of capital for a specific project. Cost of capital is the company's cost of using funds provided by creditors and shareholders. Re = cost of equity Rd = cost of debt E = market value of the firm's equity D = market value of the firm's debt V = E + D E/V = percentage of financing that is equity D/V = percentage of financing that is debt Tc = corporate tax rate This case includes three costs of capital cost of debt, cost of equity and...

Words: 600 - Pages: 3

New Heritage Doll Company

...________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Harvard Business School Professor Timothy Luehrman and HBS MBA Heide Abelli prepared this reading to accompany the Finance Simulation: Capital Budgeting (HBP No. 3357). This reading is fictionalized, is not a source of primary data or an illustration of elective or ineffective management and any resemblance to actual persons or entities is coincidental. Copyright c 2010 Harvard Business School Publishing. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, call 1-800-545-7685, write Harvard Business Publishing, Boston, MA 02163, or go to http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means.electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise.without the permission of Harvard Business Publishing. Harvard Business Publishing is an affiliate of Harvard Business School. ONLINE SIMULATION FOREGROUND READING Finance: Capital Budgeting Company and Industry Overview The New Heritage Doll Company, based in Sacramento, California, was a privately held company with 450 employees and approximately $245 million in fiscal 2009 revenues. This represented approximately 8% of the $3.1 billion U.S. doll industry, which was projected to grow by 2% annually to $3.4 billion in retail sales by 2013. In turn, the doll industry...

Words: 2279 - Pages: 10

New Heritage Doll

... New Heritage Doll Company Capital Budgeting Analysis The New Heritage Doll Company is a company that makes dolls for children between the ages 3 – 12 years. The company has revenues of 245 million USD and an operating profit of 24 million USD. The company has three major divisions – The Retailing division, the Licensing division and the Production division. The head of the production division has to choose between two capital intensive projects that have been presented to her - the “Make My Doll Clothing Extension” (MMDCE henceforth) and the “Design Your Own Doll” (DYOD henceforth). This paper will try and analyze some of the issues that may need to be taken into account by the division head before she chooses a project for final approval. Issue 1: Product Line Growth Rate vs Industry Growth Rate The doll segment in the US is slated to grow at 3% in 2013 and lasting franchise value for branded lines of dolls is considered rare – most doll lines lose their popularity within a few years of launch. Given this reality, the underlying assumption of the two brand managers for the two projects is, in my opinion, quite optimistic. The MMDCE line is expected to grow at 8% while the DYOD line is expected to grow at 6% - which is much higher than the expected rate of growth in the dolls segment. The production head must, in my opinion, do due diligence and consider if the growth rates for these product lines can exceed the average industry growth rate by such a large extent. Issue 2...

Words: 1004 - Pages: 5

Heritage Doll Simulation

... comes to justifying decisions based off risky situations. Instead, of going with low and medium risk projects similar to my first simulation, the projects that were chosen were all high. If the risk was not there, there was no interest. Simulation number three was focused on the licensing portion of the Heritage Doll Company. The three divisions of the company were production, retail, and licensing, with the bulk of the corporation’s revenue belonging to production and retail. Nowadays, licensing divisions in all industries growing in popularity, I thought a good simulation tactic would be to try to boost the time and money put into the licensing division. There is always money to be made when it comes to licensing and thought it would be interesting to see the results when it came to the effects it would have on the other two divisions. The final simulation that was run was the spending approach. The thought process for this simulation was in order to make money, you have to spend money. Any project that could be taken on would be taken on in this simulation. Although this was somewhat similar to the high-risk approach, it differed in the amount of projects that were carried out. In this simulation, the majority of the projects that were available were completed and surprisingly it worked pretty well. Summary of Outcomes The first simulation did not yield the strong results that were expected. Across the board the numbers were not poor, but there...

Words: 1401 - Pages: 6

New Heritage Doll

... the standard doll. Advantages * We are not looking at which projects may have a positive impact on the company’s other business units. Perhaps one project stimulates the retail of licensing business more than the other. * The MMDC project could allow you to start using fashion outlets as an additional sales channel for the clothes and even increase sales of all dolls in the process * The MMDC project will be moving in another product category (fashion) and may create a brand name in that category. People that hadn’t heard from Heritage as a doll manufacturer may therefore get to know the company and purchase dolls in the future 5. List two assumptions that you think are prone to error and explain your choice For this question we tried to identify the assumptions that have the highest possible impact on the NPV analysis. a. Terminal value of the project. The project makes the assumption that cash flows in 2021 and onwards will continue into eternity growing at a rate of 3%. Although this number is the expected growth rate of the industry, this may be quite high especially as the case states that lasting brands in the doll industry are rare. The terminal value makes up a significant a part of the NPV (without it, the NPV of both projects would actually be negative). Although we do not think the terminal value should be ignored, we should however be aware that it is prone to error. It could also change our decision to go for one or the other...

Words: 1006 - Pages: 5

New Heritage

...Risk considerations A major concern to be addressed in the New Heritage Doll case study is the risk, the two projects being evaluated having very different risk profiles. The strategy typically employed by New Heritage Company when assessing a projects’ risk is based on customer acceptance, technological uncertainty and high fixed costs. This note suggests an alternate strategy, trying to quantify the strategic growth potential for the New Heritage Doll Company of each project; therefore an integrated risk assessment approach based on both uncertainty and strategic and product positioning advantage delivered by each project will be used for project valuation. The “Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion” project delivers an increment in the existing market segment by expanding the current warm weather clothing and accessories line, capitalizing on the popularity of the current offering and its premium pricing, having a similar risk profile as the current division business. The “Design Your Own Doll” project would deliver a “one-of-a-kind” doll ownership experience, and is expected to command the premium price associated with a custom doll. But more important, beside the new possibilities opened by the online customization of the dolls for expanding the current New Heritage market segment, the impact of the actual experience delivered by the girl interaction with the software while designing the doll should be further evaluated. This is a gaming-like experience that the...

Words: 370 - Pages: 2

New Heritage Doll Company

...Marina Chmykhalo-Friermood Professor N. Cohen FINA 6273-Section 10 October 23, 2014 New Heritage Doll Company Write-up Introduction New Heritage Doll Company is a firm that has ventured into doll production which has sought to extend its brand in order to broaden its market framework and more importantly capitalize on high levels of customer loyalty. The vice president of the Company, Emily Harris, is to forward her project proposal to the Budgeting Committee for evaluation. The Vice-president’s objective for proposing the project was based on potential to strengthen the Company’s division of production and drive future growth. Emily Harris has to produce a compelling project to avoid the committee from declining the proposal. Basis of Assessment There are two projects between which the company can choose from or drop the proposals in their entirety. The methods of project evaluation would be based on discounting cash flows analysis and thereafter determining the Net Present Value (NPV) of each of the proposed project with Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Profitability Index and Payback Period. If the project has a positive NPV, it would suggests the project is generating more cash than is required to service the debt and provide the appropriate returns; thus, the higher NPV, the better it is for the company. The project proposal with the positive and highest NPV, IRR and profitability index along with the shortest payback period would be acceptable for investment...

Words: 1346 - Pages: 6

New Heritage Doll Company Solution

... 5.958 NPV of Design Your Own Doll TV growth rate 1% 2% 7.263 $ 9.198 $ 5.526 $ 6.998 $ 4.294 $ 5.479 $ NPV if TV=BV of NWC + PPE $ 3.567 $ 2.980 $ 2.507 Discount rate 7,70% 8,40% 9,00% $ $ $ 0% 5.830 $ 4.404 $ 3.372 $ 3% 11.957 9.016 7.058 1973 Sales forecast Total market volume Market share VOL*SHARE Existing capacity New capacity Price/ton NEW SALES Profits Price/ton Cost/ton Pretax profit/ton x new tons=pre tax profit Tax line 0.48 EBIAT (EBI after taxes) cost of plant/ton x tons added Capex 555 330 225 0,0 0 0,0 900 15 13,5 752 0,35 263,2 325 0 555 0 1974 774 0,4 309,6 325 0 665 0 1975 798 0,45 359,1 325 34,1 760 25,9 1976 822 0,45 369,9 325 44,9 890 40,0 1977 846 0,45 380,7 325 55,7 955 53,2 1978 872 0,45 392,4 325 67,4 1015 68,4 1979 898 0,45 404,1 325 79,1 1070 84,6 1980 925 0,45 416,25 325 91,25 1120 102,2 1981 952 0,45 428,4 325 103,4 1170 121,0 1982 981 0,45 441,45 325 116,45 1210 140,9 1983 1010 0,45 454,5 325 129,5 1270 164,5 1984 1041 0,45 468,45 325 143,45 1320 189,4 1985 1072 0,45 482,4 325 157,4 1370 215,6 665 390 275 0,0 0 0,0 927 10 9,3 760 460 300 10,2 4,9 5,3 955 10 9,6 890 540 350 15,7 7,5 8,2 983 10 9,8 955 580 375 20,9 10,0 10,9 1013 11 11,1 1015 620 395 26,6 12,8 13,8 1043 11 11,5 1070 660 410 32,4 15,6 16,9 1075 12 12,9 1120 690 430 39,2 18,8 20,4 1107 12 13,3 1170 710 460 47,6 22,8 24,7 1140 12 13,7 1210 740 470 54,7 26,3 28,5 1174 13 15,3 1270 770 500 64,8 31,1......

Words: 3437 - Pages: 14

New Heritage Doll Company

...New Heritage Doll Company Financial Assessment Executive Summary New Heritage Doll Company’s production division has two serious proposals that will be presented to the capital budget committee. The first proposal, named Match My Doll Clothing Line extension, will add year round seasonal clothing to Heritage’s product line. This proposal’s NPV was $7,326.11. The IRR was 24.10% and the MIRR was 20.68%. The Profitability Index was 3.08 and the payback period was 7.11 years. The value of the tax shield is $647,000. The second proposal, called Design Your Own Doll, is a new product line related to the heirloom line. It is one that will allow customers to customize the looks of the dolls they purchase through the New Heritage Doll Company website by utilizing a new software program. This proposal has an NPV of $8,200.45. The IRR is 17.64% and the MIRR is 16.13%. It has a Profitability Index of 2.13 and a payback period of 10.11 years. The value of the tax shield for this project is $629,000. The screening of these projects was extensive and based on this analysis we recommend the Match My Doll Clothing line extension. Although the Design Your Own Doll Line has a higher NPV, it is not the key factor as to what we should use when picking one project over the other. It is important to factor in the IRR, MIRR, Payback Period, and the PI as well. Furthermore, we included the Value of the Tax Shield into our valuation of which project to choose. The Match My Doll...

Words: 3636 - Pages: 15

Case Study on New Heritage Doll Company:

...FINA6278               Financial  Theory  And   Research   Case  Study  on  New  Heritage  Doll  Company:      Capital  Budgeting                             Niweina  Song                             Xin  Gu                             Yao-­‐Hsuan  Yeh                             Huiyang  Zhou       Table  of  Contents   Executive  Summary  ......................................................................................................................  2   Evaluation  Logic  ............................................................................................................................  2   Conclusion  Analysis  ......................................................................................................................  3   Pros  and  Cons  of  the  Recommended  Action  ..................................................................................  4   Analysis  of  the  Match  My  Doll  Clothing  Line  .................................................................................  5   Analysis  of  the  Design  Your  Own  Doll  Line...

Words: 1146 - Pages: 5

New Heritage Doll Company Case

...NEW HERITAGE DOLL COMPANY FINA 6278 Case 1 I. Executive Summary New Heritage Doll Company is a U.S based children toy manufacturer with a well-known national brand: the New Heritage. With its existing three divisions, New Heritage proposed two potential investment projects in order to expand its business while the doll industry was facing a relatively low growth rate. The first proposal is the Match My Doll Clothing line expansion, which is to expand a new clothing product line aimed at matching doll and child clothing and accessories covering all four seasons. While it has potential benefits with the current fashion trend of dressing the same between dolls and children, the New Heritage is facing a challenge of entering a new field and the doubt of being continuable project or not even with a success of the first sale of the cloth collection. The second proposal is a high-end product line which is called Design Your Own Doll that targets at the firm’s existing loyal customers who already held several heritage dolls. Such a project is appropriate with the company’s core business. However, it requires large amount of investment and longtime payback period. Considering the benefits and disadvantages of both the projects, the second proposal seems more compelling due to its match of firm’s core business, longer-term focus, and possibility to enhance customer loyalty. However, the question to expand customer pool was not answered yet. As a result, the...

Words: 1835 - Pages: 8

New Heritage

...Dylan Steele Professor Elhaj New Heritage Doll Company March 16th 2016 Case Memo This case study was very interesting, and challenging because of the choice that had to be made between the two successful companies. The two investment projects New Heritage had to choose between were Design Your Own Doll and Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion. After studying the case and figuring out some numbers without going to in depth, Match My Doll Clothing Line Expansion was more compelling at first. To begin, I used the total cost of initial expenditures that was given to appraise the two projects in order to see which one was more feasible. The four variables used in table 2 & 3 to find the total cost were initial expense, upfront R&D, plant property and equipment, and the investment in working capital. Design Your Own Doll had a higher total cost of $2291 in capital expenditures. Therefore, Match My Doll was more compelling at first glance since it had less capital invested on it. The capital budgeting decision criteria gives us plenty of information to help with the decision. After looking at variables in the criteria my decision to choose Match My Doll at first reformed toward Design Your Own Doll. Some of the strengths for Design Your Own Doll are its operating profit and its growth in revenue over its ten-year life. The first year after production, Design Your Doll’s growth in revenue was up 139.3%. After year 2015, its growth leveled off to 6% in perpetuity...

Words: 579 - Pages: 3