Free Essay

Nike's Unethical Business Practices

In: Business and Management

Submitted By nochange29
Words 1640
Pages 7
Nike Inc.
Nike’s Unethical Business Practices

Nike’s Unethical Business Practices
Love those Nike shoes your wearing? Have you ever thought how they were made, who made them, and at what price they were made at? I bet you probably don’t. I bet that you see those Nike shoes at the store, and think to yourself, “oh I like those shoes, I have to have them,” and then buy them. What you don’t know is that those pair of shoes you just bought were probably made in a third world factory by employees who are probably working in harsh working conditions. These factories are not owned and operated by Nike, but contracted by Nike. Nike chooses to locate the majority of their production in such countries because of the abundance of cheap labor. Nike contracts factories around the world in effort to get the best product for the cheapest price made, without concern for contracted factory employee. Nike has not been concerned about what goes on in these factories only that the product is made, because Nike is not in the business for Human Rights, they’re in the business of athletic shoes sales.
The Ethical Dilemma
Nike has been accused with human rights violations. The charges that were made against Nike include the following: the use of child labor in factories, unsafe working conditions including exposure to toxic chemicals and the use of machinery without the proper safety precautions, pay below minimum wage and forced overtime hours. The contracted factories Nike uses to produce its shoes have not operated in a way as to promote human rights. This becomes an ethical dilemma for Nike. The ethical dilemma Nike faces is whether or not to continue to benefit from cheap labor practices or spend more money to allow the contracted factories to improve its working conditions. Although Nike is profiting from the cheap labor cost of production, the contracted factory is employing children to make the product. At first glance Nike turns a blind eye to the business practices; however, once the media is alerted about the situation, Nike begrudgingly is forced to do something about the matter because of how the consumers react. Nike’s Code of Conduct now states that Nike “opposes child labor” and that Nike has “set age standards at 16 for apparel and 18 for footwear factories,” (“Code of Conduct”).
In factories in Vietnam, workers were exposed to Toluene, a reproductive toxin, at 177 times the legal limit (“Nike’s Labour Practices”). They were also exposed to other chemicals and glue without proper safety equipment. The factory workers lives have been severely impacted by this because of the lack of concern for workers safety. By not providing the proper safety equipment to perform a job and exposing workers to toxic chemicals that will reduce workers life spans dramatically, this is unethical and a huge human rights violation. Nike now ensures that all factories provide the right safety equipment for employees to do their job.
Nike has been accused of not paying a “living-wage” which is unethical and another human rights violation. A living wage is considered a pay that is able to supply basic necessities for a small family (Connor). In Vietnam, workers receive about $37 a month, which is below the minimum wage of $45 a month (“Fact Sheet”). In Indonesia, Nike has increased wages for workers to above the minimum wage set by the government. While this is seen as a step in the correct direction, worker’s pay is still roughly one half of what would be considered a “living wage” for this country (“Frequently”). In China, it is common for workers to engage in a 10 to 12 hour work day before working another two to four hours of overtime (“Nike’s Labour Practices”). In Vietnamese factories, workers making Nike merchandize have been found to be forced to work over 600 hours of overtime a year, which is more than 400 hours a year above the legal limit in Vietnam (“Fact Sheet”). Workers have reported being coerced into the overtime hours through threats of unemployment or forced indirectly by the low pay to volunteer for the hours in order to support their families. This in other words is a form of slavery. There are only 24 hours in a day and to spend 16 hours or more at work in order to keep a job is a complete denial of a right to life, or in other words a human rights violation.
Managements Perspective
In America, Nike's owners see the abuse much differently. In front of hundreds of shareholders, after announcing record earnings and another stock split, Nike's president and CEO, Phil Knight minimized the problems in Asia as simply an incident in which a single worker was hit over the head by a supervisor. Nike spokesperson Jim Small, while knowing that the conditions in the sixteen Indonesian plants are not ideal, said, "The bottom line is: Do we abuse our workers? Absolutely not." (Levy, "Working conditions protested at the opening of a new store). Roberta Baskin of CBS News commented that, "It turns out Nike has a great deal to learn about what goes on inside these factories."
Nike spends between $250-$280 million dollars a year on athletic endorsements. Nike's total annual payroll at six Indonesian factories is less than what Nike pays superstar Michael Jordan per year. A pair of Nike's top-of the-line running shoe, the Air Max shoe retails for $140. Nike admits that the direct labor cost to produce the shoe is about $3.50, which doesn't account for Nike's marketing or distribution costs. It is not that Nike can't afford to pay it's workers more, they just don't choose to. It is just recently that the public found out and began to pressure Nike to raise wages. Wages have gone up a little bit, but not good enough for the leading sports shoe manufacturer. Nike can still do a lot better. Nike has treated sweatshop allegations as an issue of public relations rather than human rights. The promises made by Phillip Knight in his May 1998 speech were an attempt by the company to switch the media focus to issues it was willing to address while avoiding the key problems of subsistence wages, forced overtime and suppression of workers' right to freedom of association. The End Result Should Nike be involved and concerned about the working conditions in these third world factories? Yes. Nike has the resources and the ability to influence change in the in the business agreements with these sub contracted factories. Nowadays as a society we want businesses to be responsible for their actions towards the environment and society. We want them to operate ethically and in a socially responsible way. We want to know that our environment is cared about, and that we as a society are cared about by our Corporate Giants & Dwarfs.
As stated earlier, Nike should be responsible to those employees of the factories they have contracted because these people are the ones who are building the shoes for them to sell. Although most of the subcontracted factories are in third world countries where labor is cheap and cost of living is low that doesn’t mean its ethical for Nike to pay the lowest possible pay for the production of their shoes, or allow harsh working conditions for these factory workers. Nike with all the money they make, they have the capability to influence the factories to operate differently. Nike has a social responsibility to make the factories follow proper regulation. Nike is the moral agent to its contracted factories and through being so they have a social contract with society that they will pursue policies that follow the lines of actions that are desirable objectives and values of our society. “Because ultimately business exist at the pleasure of society and as a result must comply with the guidelines established by society” (H.R. Bowen).
Nike today has taken a new approach on the matter of corporate social responsibility, while in the past it was the black sheep of corporate America, it has taken huge strides to clean up its image. Nike was named one of the Top Socially Responsible brands by young adults. Donations to charity, use of green products, and employing fair labor practices were just a few of the criteria which the students based their opinions of the corporations.
The irony of this is that it seems like just yesterday that Nike was constantly under attack for their labor practices. They were maligned for much of the 1990′s by accusations that they underpaid their labors, that they took advantage of the cheap labor in third world countries. Nike’s inclusion as the top apparel company on this survey indicates that those hard feelings are not affecting generation Y. That speaks volumes to the job Nike has done over the past decade to turn themselves into a more socially responsible corporation.

References
"Code of Conduct." Nikebiz: Responsibility. Jan. 2004. http//www.nike.com/nikebiz/nikebiz.jhtml?page=25 (1 Feb. 2004). “Nike’s Labour Practices.” Red de Solidaridad de la Maquila Solidarity Network. 1998. http://www.maquilasolidarity.org/campaigns/nike/labprac98.htm (25 Jan. 2004).
Conner, Tim. "Still Waiting for Nike to Do It." Global Exchange. May 2001. http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/sweatshops/nike/faq.html.pf (25 Jan. 2004). “Nike – VN Fact Sheet.” Boycott Nike. 30 Jan. 1999. http://www.saigon.com/~nike/factsheet.htm (1 Feb. 2004).
"Frequently Asked Questions." Global Exchange. 13 Aug. 2003. http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/nike/codes.html (1 Feb. 2004).
Levy, Dan., "Work conditions protested at opening of new store." San Francisco Chronicle, Sat, Feb 22, 1997: pA15
Text (Lewis, Goodman, Fandt, Michlitsch, Adminstrative Management, 2007) p.61

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Nike

...Degree of Business Administration Assignment [a] Swot analysis: [b] Ethical issue: Student’s Name: Low Chi Yeow Marks: Lecturer’s Name: Dr. GP Doraisamy Contents 1.0 Company history……………………………………………………………………………………. 2.0 Swot analysis.................................................................................................. 3.0 Ethical issue……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4.0 Conclusion......................................................................................................... Preliminary Information: Iconography Explained Nike's Heritage NIKE, pronounced NI-KEY, is the winged goddess of victory according to Greek mythology. She sat at the side of Zeus, the ruler of the Olympic pantheon, in Olympus. A mystical presence, symbolizing victorious encounters, NIKE presided over history's earliest battlefields. A Greek would say, "When we go to battle and win, we say it is NIKE." Synonymous with honored conquest, NIKE is the twentieth century footwear that lifts the world's greatest athletes to new levels of mastery and achievement. The NIKE 'swoosh' embodies the spirit of the winged goddess who inspired the most courageous and chivalrous warriors at the dawn of civilization. (from...

Words: 3267 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Nike: Managing Ethical Missteps

...Durrell Simms Nike: Managing Ethical Missteps The Nike Corporation is a huge brand that targets athletes, colleges, and product manufacturing. The company was founded by Phil Knight and his track coach, Bill Bowerman, in 1964. “The company was renamed Nike in 1978, and has grown to be the largest worldwide seller of athletic goods, with approximately 19,000 retail accounts in the United States and about 160 countries around the world” (386). Nike built its “good quality” reputation from popular athletic sponsors. Although the brand was growing into a successful sports oriented company, high demand for the product led to thought on how to manufacture more apparel. The founders of the company devised a plan on how to increase manufacture while not completely blowing their accounts on laboring. The company agreed to take their manufacturing overseas to third-world countries where the cost of laboring is cheaper. “In the late 1980s after going public, the late 1990s began a period composed of combating allegations about labor and human rights violations” (386). Nike was accused of over working their foreign employees, and providing them poor, unsanitary work environments. Subcontracting was mainly the reason why this situation occurred. Subcontracting is the process of reducing cost to allow projects or manufacturing to take place. This action basically allows companies to take advantage of the workers they hire for cheaper service. Children were also hired...

Words: 1207 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Unethical Issues

...Nike Inc. Nike’s Unethical Business Practices Nike’s Unethical Business Practices Love those Nike shoes your wearing? Have you ever thought how they were made, who made them, and at what price they were made at? I bet you probably don’t. I bet that you see those Nike shoes at the store, and think to yourself, “oh I like those shoes, I have to have them,” and then buy them. What you don’t know is that those pair of shoes you just bought were probably made in a third world factory by employees who are probably working in harsh working conditions. These factories are not owned and operated by Nike, but contracted by Nike. Nike chooses to locate the majority of their production in such countries because of the abundance of cheap labor. Nike contracts factories around the world in effort to get the best product for the cheapest price made, without concern for contracted factory employee. Nike has not been concerned about what goes on in these factories only that the product is made, because Nike is not in the business for Human Rights, they’re in the business of athletic shoes sales. The Ethical Dilemma Nike has been accused with human rights violations. The charges that were made against Nike include the following: the use of child labor in factories, unsafe working conditions including exposure to toxic chemicals and the use of machinery without the proper safety precautions, pay below minimum wage and forced overtime hours. The contracted factories Nike uses to produce...

Words: 338 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Shanshan

...Unethical Companies: McDonald’s May 14, 2010 — ethicalfootprint Mostly everyone will enjoy McDonald’s every once in a while, even if you aren’t a fan of fast food. While the food may be cheap, it may come at more of a cost to the environment and the global economy than one might think. McDonald’s has a negative impact on the environment in more ways than one. Aside from the pollution from factories where the food is produced, the unusable waste from nearly all the food they sell, and the massive amounts of power and energy that are required to keep all of the branches up and running, this corporation is destroying natural rain forests. According to http://www.dmoz.org/Society/Issues/Business/Allegedly_Unethical_Firms/McDonald’s/, McDonald’s likes to purchase their meat from privatised farms, which is not a problem in and of itself. The conflict arises when these privatised farmlands are built on the land where a lush rainforest once resided. So not only is McDonald’s polluting our air, but they are destroying a large part of what would help to clean it out. The trees that are levelled do more than just clean the air, though. They are also homes to thousands of animals that are likely killed or made homeless as the trees are torn down. This is not exactly a healthy step in making our world a better place. The people at McDonald’s treat their employees no better than they treat our environment. McDonald’s staff are frequently underpaid for the amount of time that they...

Words: 2358 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Global Business Ethics-Nike’s Sweatshops

...Global Business Ethics-Nike’s Sweatshops Ann T. Dale MGT/216 Global Business Ethics-Nike’s Sweatshops Nike is a worldwide sports name in wear and equipment. So, why is Nike’s ethics in question? Has greed and publicity become their motto at any costs? Nike spends multimillion dollars a year hiring well-known athletes to advertise their products yet cannot seem to stay out of the media’s eye of their contracting or subcontracting techniques of their products to be built in third world countries. In 1996, Nike has been charged by critics with engaging in a variety of unethical employment practices in countries that exercise little or no control over the conditions of labor or whose governments are corrupt and can be bought off (De George, 2006, chap. 20). In dealing with business issues, a company needs to be aware (what are the issues), articulate (justify and express decisions), and application (reach a decision, train and explain ethics to employees). Ethical behavior has to start at the top of a company and work its way down. Here we will compare ethical perceptions across cultures about the ethical situation, discuss the ethical issues that became evident due to globalization, and discuss the risks and consequences associated with the Nike ethical dilemma. Compare Ethical Perceptions Across Cultures About the Ethical Situation Trevino and Nelson (2007) defines business best stating the “definition of ethics—the principles, norms, and standards of conduct governing...

Words: 1683 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Nike Corporation Sweat Shop

...huge dilemmas. Because factories cause pollution, waste of hazardous chemicals, and water shortages. These negative effects on the community are some of the challenges of manufacturing. Also the high inquiry of cheap labor tends to lead to unsafe working practices for employees. Such as underage workers, and abuse, these are all unsafe working practices and unethical business decisions. With the public refusing to purchase their products and revenues and stocks declining Nike needed to regain the public’s interest. In efforts to do so Nike launched numerous campaigns to address the public’s concern. One was trying to improve the standards of its factories Nike has issued a code of conduct, joined various organizations to help improve labor standards, and encourages contractors to promote safe working conditions. Because of the many allegations Nike wanted to protect its name so they launched the reputation management campaign. This proved that the acquisitions against them were false. Although the campaign served its purpose Marc Kasky felt that it was misguiding. Marc argued that their “commercial speech” was simply “false advertising” (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2008, p.390) and sued Nike for $2 million. Nike’s corporate social responsibility has improved since the early 1990’s but they still have a...

Words: 656 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Nike Labour Code

...changed its name to Nike, Inc. in 1978. After being launched into public, Nike began its rise in the 1980's and the Nike brand was considered as one of the famous companies specialized in sports shoes all over the world. The lower cost of production and innovation advertising and marketing policies helped Nike to get success and big growth. However, in the mid-1990's, labor rights activists, the media accsused Nike for violations of human rights in their factories in the third-world countries such as Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, China, and Vietnam. The bad health and safety working conditions, low wages, and discrimination in hiring and firing practices in Nike’s factories were accusations of Nike company. Ernst and Young company audited one of Nike’s factories and discovered that extreme, unacceptable standards of chemicals in Nike’s factories are main reasons caused employee’s health problems. The code of conduct was violated. Protestors, Universities against Nike refused and canceled their deals with Nike to produce athletic goods. In 1998, Nike turnovers and stock prices decreased by about 50% leading to the laying off sixteen hundred workers. Through extensive public relations campaigns, Nike tried to deal with the allegations about the labor and human rights violations. Nike established a workplace code of conduct to regulate working conditions in foreign...

Words: 453 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Nike: from Sweatshops to Leadership in Employment Practices

...HRM522 Ethical & Advocacy for HR Professionals Dr. Jeanette Horner-Smith December 14th, 2014 “Nike: From Sweatshops to Leadership in Employment Practices” The Nike Corporation is a huge brand that targets athletes, colleges, and product manufacturing. The company was founded by Phil Knight and his track coach, Bill Bowerman, in 1964. “The company was renamed Nike in 1978, and has grown to be the largest worldwide seller of athletic goods, with approximately 19,000 retail accounts in the United States and about 160 countries around the world” (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2011). Nike built its “good quality” reputation from popular athletic sponsors. Although the brand was growing into a successful sports oriented company, high demand for the product led to thought on how to manufacture more apparel. The founders of the company devised a plan on how to increase manufacturing while not completely blowing their accounts on laboring. The company agreed to take their manufacturing overseas to third-world countries where the cost of laboring is cheaper. “In the late 1980s after going public, the late 1990s began a period composed of combating allegations about labor and human rights violations” (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2011). Nike was accused of over working their foreign employees, and providing them poor, unsanitary work environments. It can be said that subcontracting was mainly the reason why the scandals occurred. Subcontracting is the process of reducing cost to allow...

Words: 1818 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Nike Case Study

...1. The macro-environmental factors that influence Nike’s strategy include culture, demographics, social issues, technological advances, economic situation, and political and regulatory environment. Culture is the shared meanings, beliefs, morals, values and customs of a group of people. In America, Nike has become an industry leader that influences our cultural practices. It is widely accepted as the premier retail brand by all age groups. Nike has done a great job of advertising to various generational cohorts and expanding its brand. Nike’s distinguishable products have become a household name on the global scale. Nike has to specifically consider the “country culture” of not only the countries where it sells product, but the cultures of the countries where the products are manufactured.  Country culture attributes include behavior, dress, symbols, physical settings, ceremonies, language, and colors. Identifying and navigating some of the more subtle aspects is difficult but necessary for global firms.   Demographics indicate the characteristics of human populations and segments, especially those used to identify consumer markets. Demographics include age, gender, race, and income.  Nike uses marketing ads to target different segments of demographics. For example, Nike’s version of the toning shoe is designed to specifically appeal to women. Social issues influence consumer behavior around the world. Recently, there has been a heavy emphasis on thrift, health and wellness...

Words: 811 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Corporate Social Responsibility Analysis

...which the concept of corporate social responsibility encourages responsible business practices. To support your evaluation and argument, include an appraisal of how two companies currently promote social responsibility. In order for companies to positively impact their communications with their stakeholders many companies like Nike and Goldman Sachs are continuously seeking new ways of carrying out corporate social responsibility Reeves (2012). The re-developments of corporate social responsibility often derive from responding actively to emerging and current issues in society (REFERENCE). (REFERENCE) describes current issues such as, human rights, labour, and environmental practices that Nike and Goldman...

Words: 1877 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Nike in Indonesia

...Nike doing business in Indonesia Firm Profile Indonesia is a difficult entrant country environment for corporations to do business in which have constraints like: child labor, low wages, mandatory overtime, and education. Low wages are beneficial for Nike; on the same token the constraints like child labor, unfair work conditions, and mandatory overtime can harm the world renowned brands repetition. The media has painted negative picture of Nike, because productivity of shoes and other athletic apparel comes with the cost of unethical work conditions and labor practices. Arguments have been made that the effort of Nike outsourcing it’s manufacturing to factories in Indonesia, is the wrong choice. Furthermore, Nike has a social responsibility to maintain a satisfactory standard in the facilities where its products are manufactured. Condoning mandatory overtime is unethical. Importance should be placed on upholding the dignity of its workers. We will determine if doing business in Indonesia is a decision that Nike should maintain, due to the negative back lash that they receive in the United States from the Media. Along with indicating what is the best strategy should be applied for doing business in Indonesia. Operation The name Nike is the Greek goddess of victory (Ballinger, 1997) .Nike Corporation was originated by Phillip Knight an athlete from Beaverton Oregon. Knight in his beginning started importing shoes from Japan in efforts to compete with athletic companies...

Words: 3279 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Nike Case

...Nike Case Questions 1. In the United States, what is Nike’s: a) Brand image, and b) sources of brand equity? a) In the United States, Nike’s brand image is built on being a high-performance, innovative and aggressive brand. The company associates the brand with top athletes through sponsorships. Since inception, Nike has placed performance as a top priority for the brand. Through designing high performance shoes and apparel, as well as sponsoring high-profile athletes and teams the brand has developed a reputation as being high-quality. Nike’s high tech products have allowed the brand to be perceived as innovative in the minds of consumers. Nike is continually introducing new products to the sports market as a way to improve performance. Through high performance and innovation, Nike has been branded as arrogant as the company has a high regard for the spirit of competition and portraying a rebellious spirit. b) Source of Brand Equity Description Logo Nike’s logo is a check mark. It is commonly referred to as the “swoosh.” As of 2000, 97 percent of American citizens recognize the brand logo. Nike has been seen as aggressive in the overabundance use of the “swoosh” with the symbol being placed on shoes, jerseys, hats, billboards and soccer balls across the globe. This ubiquity has been criticized as diluted the “swoosh”. Advertising Advertising has allowed Nike to portray its rebellious spirit and “nasty boy” image. However, this approach in advertisement has...

Words: 1782 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Nike Case

... f. Women discrimination g. Unfair business with minorities such as older worker, religious minorities h. Unlawful business practice Would the use of the third party independent contractors insulate MNC's from being attacked? Would that practice offer MNC's a good defensive shield against charges of abuse of “their employees”? Answer: Human rights issues is one of the most important issues in this globalization era. There are no universal or International Standard of what is right or wrong because of the cultural differences among the countries. For example, some country appreciate child labor but some country has a strict law of child labor. So when a business organization conducts business in another country, they are trying to take advantage of that country. The reason for an organization to do business beyond the border is to maximize their profit. Sometimes some MNC does offshore or outsourcing to get the job done. So some MNC goes to the third world country to gain economies of scale. For example Apple Inc. Products are produced by a third party independent manufacturer Foxconn, which situated in China. They have some controversies about some unethical human rights issues which brings public attention. Even though Foxconn produce apple inc. products. But Apple Inc. Face any loss for that. So Yes, the use of third party independent contractors insulate MNC from being attacked by the customer for ethics. Yes, this practice would offer MNCs a good defensive...

Words: 1211 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Business Ethics Issue of Nike

...(i) Identify any THREE (3) unethical issues in your organisation. Nike (figure 1) is a very well-known company which produce quality shoe and athletic wear around the world. It is founded by an athlete named Philip Knight and his couch Bill Bowerman (Figure 2) in January 1964. Its slogan called ‘Just Do It’. The quality and standard of its products have been strongly recognised by people, even though Nike’s products are considered expensive, yet its performance makes it valuable. i. Inhumane working conditions. Although Nike’s products and services are able to satisfy its consumers, there are some invisibly unethical issues which happened between its employers and employees that are intolerable. The first serious case is Nike’s workers faced direct violence in the factory. According to the daily mail reporter, workers announced that they are being mentally and physically abused at the sweatshops. The supervisors often slap them in the face, kick them, throw shoes at them and call them ‘dogs’ and ‘pigs’. With the proofs, one of the workers in Sukabumi mentioned that she was kicked by a supervisor because of making a mistake while cutting rubber for soles. Some workers also described that they were being hit or scratched in the arm until they bled. Besides that, a 30 years old lady named Mira Agustina, was fired in 2009 for taking sick leave even doctor’s note was summited. She said furiously that it was a terrible work and the bosses frequently insult the workers by...

Words: 3676 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Nike

...Nike, Inc. and Sweatshops Over the years Nike has been called out for their unethical practices in shoe making. Nike does not actually make shoes but has subcontractors who do and Nike just sells them with their logo on them. The blame of being unethical in this came with the sweatshops is held with both Nike and the subcontractors. This is because Nike has an amoral style of management in regards to utilizing foreign production facilities, more commonly known as sweatshops, for cheaper labor to produce their products. The term amoral management appears to encompass both ends of the morality spectrum; moral management conforms with the highest standards of ethics and professional behavior whereas immoral management is a complete disregard for ethical principles that imply an active opposition to ethical behavior. Amoral management lacks the moral awareness of being moral management, either intentionally or unintentionally, and pretends to be more focused on acting lawful not necessarily being lawful. The focus of this case is the ethical dilemma Nike is faced with because of their ongoing use of sweatshops to manufacture their shoes with low cost so as to maximize the company’s profits. When Nike was first introduced they were an American made product but soon sought to outsource their labor to meet growing demands. It was not until Kathy Lee Gifford discovered that her clothing line was being made in sweatshops did anyone really start to take interest in the company doings...

Words: 1073 - Pages: 5