Free Essay

Npda

In: Other Topics

Submitted By kage
Words 507
Pages 3
The most interesting concept I learned about NPDA debate is the structures of the debate. When I thought of argumentation and deliberation originally, I pictured a panel style setting with four or five people on each side arguing their points by taking turns. Learning the proper style and terms such as rebuttal, which “sum up the debate and crystallize the important issues for the judges” (Cantrell & Swift, 2012, p. 104). The rebuttal justifies which team has won the debate and this round allows each side to prove their points. During the rebuttal the lead opposition will be allowed to speak for four minutes to demonstrate their opposing views on the topic. They will present all of the topics that have been brought up by the government and they will present their evidence to discourage the government’s arguments. The Prime Minister will have five minutes to speak during the rebuttal and they will justify their position in their argument by supporting their topics and counter arguing the opposition’s topics. In other words, the rebuttal sets the final tone of the entire debate and it has the power to change the opinion of the judge. Not only is it persuasive but it is also the final counter argument. During this round it is highly pertinent that both speakers focus on the most important topics that were presented throughout the debate. They are discouraged from presenting new arguments during the rebuttal stage and teams have the opportunity to interrupt the argument and involve the judge. The judge will then determine if the argument is new and they will have the final say in allowing the speaker to justify their argument. For example, this is similar to a closing argument in a legal court trial. During the closing arguments, both lawyers will summarize all of the evidence and issues that were presented throughout the trial. They do this to point out all of the important facts that favor their side of the argument, hoping that their last argument will ultimately create a lasting impression on the grand jury. During this phase, it is their job to make the juries rethink their stance on the case and to ultimately aid them in making a decision. This is like a court trial for murder with a lack of sufficient evidence. In America, within our justice system we have a famous saying, “innocent until proven guilty.” Ultimately, the evidence presented throughout the trial, the presentation provided by the lawyers, and the closing arguments are going to have a large impression on the grand jury. This will help them make a decision of guilty or innocent. This was famously seen in the O.J. Simpson court trial that involved his late wife. Simpson was arrested for murdering his ex-wife and her male friend. The trial was long but in the end Simpson was found not guilty due to a lack of sufficient evidence. He had some of the best lawyers fighting on his side and the trial ended up ruling in his favor.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Npda Concept

...NPDA DEBATE The most interesting concept I learned about NPDA debate is the concept of the counter case and the role the two contending teams play in the debate. The debate has two rival teams who discuss their arguments and ideas about the resolution. The concept of the counter case is a central part in the NPDA debate where the proposition team affirms the motion presented to the debaters, and the opposition team, which opposes the resolution and/or the case, brought out by the proposition team. In other words,the NPDA debate is made up of two competing teams who represent two different sides of an issue. The proposing team defends the motion, presented to the debaters laying out the facts it has supporting the motion and providing an argument that validates the motion. Consequently, the opposing team can then make good use of the concept of the counter case. This is where the opposing team refutes or challenges the resolution while at the same time expressing their views that disagree with the proposition teams plan and idea (Rainbolt, & Dwyer, 2011). The opposing team debates on the issue differently and challenges the propositions suggestion. The opposition team responds to the proponent’s statements and puts into consideration the other side of the debate trying to sound more persuasive and reasonable. The counter argument presented by the opposing team thus provides reasonable doubt to the proposition team’s opinion. The proposition team on the other hand has......

Words: 882 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Five Force Analysis of Pc

...Analyse Marketing du Besoin Cyrielle VELLERA cyrielle.vellera@upmf-grenoble.fr Le marketing mix : Analyse Marketing du Besoin – Génie Industriel 2 Analyse du marché Concurrents Comportement d’achat Segmentation Formulation des choix de l’entreprise Ciblage Positionnement Mise en œuvre Marketing mix : les « 4P » Produit Prix Communication «Promotion » Distribution « Place » Analyse Marketing du Besoin – Génie Industriel 3 Les « 4P » Politique de produit Politique de prix Gestion de l’offre marketing Politique de distribution Politique de communication Mise en valeur de l’offre Analyse Marketing du Besoin – Génie Industriel 4 Qu’est ce que le marketing mix? Le marketing mix « désigne l'ensemble cohérent de décisions relatives aux politiques de produit, de prix, de distribution et de communication des produits d'une entreprise ou d'une marque ». Kotler et Dubois Analyse Marketing du Besoin – Génie Industriel 5 Le marketing mix : le produit Analyse Marketing du Besoin – Génie Industriel 6 1. Qu’est-ce qu’un produit? On appelle « produit » tout ce qui peut être offert sur un marché de façon à satisfaire un besoin (Kotler, Keller et Manceau, 2012) - Bien tangible - Service - Expérience - Événement - Endroit - Organisation - Personne - Idée Analyse Marketing du Besoin – Génie Industriel 7 2. Les classifications de produit - La durée de vie et la tangibilité - Les biens de grande consommation...

Words: 4208 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Diabetes

...Diabetes transition Assessment of current best practice and development of a future work programme to improve transition processes for young people with diabetes. Transition in healthcare is only one part of the evolution from dependent child to independent adult (David, 2001). Submitted by Ruth Gordon, Ruth Gordon Associates Ltd to NHS Diabetes. Supporting, Improving, Caring August 2012 Acknowledgements This project was funded by NHS Diabetes and supported by Gillian Johnson, North East Regional Programme Manager. The expert panel was made up of a group of clinicians and others who provided information, commented on the process and contributed to the views included in this final report. Others have influenced the later stages of the work and will be involved in planning how to take this project forwards. Therefore thanks go to: • Fiona Campbell • Deborah Christie • Chris Cooper • Julie Cropper • Gail Dovey-Pearce • Jane Edmunds • Gavin Eyres • Sue Greenhalgh • Peter Hammond • Gillian Johnson • Susannah Rowles • Carolyn Stephenson • Helen Thornton • Peter Winocour • Alison Woodhead Without the two clinical leads, Peter Hammond from Harrogate and Fiona Campbell from Leeds, this work and report would not have been possible. Contents Executive summary Context Background and rationale Aims of the project Timing of the project Process undertaken for the project Evidence base and policy background Results from the snapshot research Good practice Examples of good......

Words: 11252 - Pages: 46

Free Essay

Business Process Management

...Lecture Notes in Computer Science Commenced Publication in 1973 Founding and Former Series Editors: Gerhard Goos, Juris Hartmanis, and Jan van Leeuwen 6336 Editorial Board David Hutchison Lancaster University, UK Takeo Kanade Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Josef Kittler University of Surrey, Guildford, UK Jon M. Kleinberg Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine, CA, USA Friedemann Mattern ETH Zurich, Switzerland John C. Mitchell Stanford University, CA, USA Moni Naor Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Oscar Nierstrasz University of Bern, Switzerland C. Pandu Rangan Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India Bernhard Steffen TU Dortmund University, Germany Madhu Sudan Microsoft Research, Cambridge, MA, USA Demetri Terzopoulos University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Doug Tygar University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA Gerhard Weikum Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbruecken, Germany Richard Hull Jan Mendling Stefan Tai (Eds.) Business Process Management 8th International Conference, BPM 2010 Hoboken, NJ, USA, September 13-16, 2010 Proceedings 13 Volume Editors Richard Hull IBM Research, Thomas J. Watson Research Center 19 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532, USA E-mail: hull@us.ibm.com Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany E-mail: contact@mendling.com Stefan Tai Karlsruhe Institute......

Words: 147474 - Pages: 590

Free Essay

Maglev

...*3963103* [3963] – 103 T.E. (Petroleum) (Semester – I) Examination, 2011 DRILLING & PRODUCTION OPERATIONS (2003 Course) Time : 3 Hours Max. Marks : 100 Instructions : 1) Question Nos. 1 and 5 are compulsory. Out of the remaining attempt 2 questions from Section I and 2 questions from Section II. 2) Answers to the two Sections should be written in separate books. 3) Neat diagrams must be drawn wherever necessary. 4) Black figures to the right indicate full marks. 5) Use of Logarithmic Tables, Slide Rule, Mollier Charts, Electronic Pocket Calculator and Steam Tables is allowed. 6) Assume suitable data, if necessary. SECTION – I 1. What are different systems on a drilling rig ? Explain any one in detail with suitable diagramme. 18 2. a) Calculate Bottom hole pressure if well depth is 2500 m and mud weight is 1.2 gm/cc. b) Calculate mud weight if mud gradient is 0.87 psi/ft. ′ c) Calculate volume bbl/meter for drill pipe O.D. = 5′ inch and I.D. = 4.276 inch. 2 2 2 10 8 8 16 d) Draw circulation system on a drilling rig. 3. a) Discuss IADC classification of a bit in details. b) Discuss different factors affecting rate of penetration in details. 4. Write short note on : i) Coring ii) Fishing tools iii) BOP iv) Directional well P.T.O. [3963] – 103 -2- *3963103* SECTION – II 5. a) Discuss different types of casings and function of the casings in brief. b) Discuss different types of well completion techniques. 6. a) Discuss primary cementation process......

Words: 172166 - Pages: 689