Free Essay

Nsa Surveillance Program

In: English and Literature

Submitted By mmunteanu
Words 2180
Pages 9
NSA Surveillance Program
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was created in 1978 as a response to past presidential abuses of massive domestic wiretapping and surveillance that were conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA) on many innocent Americans. FISA was designated to limit warrantless foreign intelligence surveillance for national security purposes and to issue the extent to which NSA could seize domestic communications. An executive power would need a warrant approved by FISA and only for the cases where the sole intention for the surveillance was to obtain foreign intelligence information (Skalski 15).
Things changed shortly after the September 11 terrorist attacks in 2001 when President Bush secretly gave authorization to the NSA to wiretap Americans on the US soil without a warrant from FISA. By the same year, the Bush Administration passed the Patriotic Act that enabled FBI to demand the sharing of “any tangible things sought relevant to an authorized investigation” (Barnett 4), including strictly domestic records. Also, three days after the terrorist attacks, the Congress passed AUMF (Authorization for Use of Military Force) Act that was a necessity, but it was wrongly used by the Bush Administration as the reason of permission for the massive spying program. Because of the secrecy of these surveillance transmissions, the American public had no idea of the existence of these types of programs until the summer of 2013 when Edward Snowden, a NSA contractor, leaked classified information to The Guardian newspaper. The film called Citizenfour produced by Laura Poitras in 2014 exposed on camera the truths about the danger of mass wiretapping program in our present society by interviewing Snowden.
There are many defenders of the NSA program that highlight its necessity and its importance for the national security and the war on terrorism. However, based on multiple credible sources in my research and the deep criticism of more and more people about it since successive revelations came to light starting with 2013, I find the NSA program to be unconstitutional because it violates the civil liberties of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution: the right to privacy, freedom of speech, and the right to be free from unreasonable searches of your home. Correspondingly, I find the NSA program to be unconstitutional because it violates the strict and limited rules imposed by FISA on warrantless foreign intelligence surveillance. Equally important, I consider the massive surveillance program unconstitutional because it is based on a misinterpretation of the AUMF Act passed by Congress on September 2001. Finally, I find the widespread wiretapping program to be unconstitutional because it causes a “chilling effect” on communication due to the public’s fear of surveillance.
I strongly think that the NSA program is unconstitutional based on the fact that it violates the rules inflicted by FISA on warrantless foreign intelligence surveillance, and because it violates the protection of the Fourth Amendment of all US citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by requiring a warrant before any federal agency can search and seize any citizen. FISA states clearly that an executive power would need a warrant approved by its court and only for the cases where the sole ”purpose of the surveillance is to obtain foreign intelligence information” (Skalsky 15). If FISA approves a request, there is a judicial form that must be completed and must specify the identity of the target, the location and the type of establishment placed under surveillance, the type of communication monitored, and the period of time approved for the surveillance. Moreover, section 1809 of FISA act says, “ it is a crime to collect electronic surveillance beyond the scope of this exclusive means […] when Congress declares war, the president shall have fifteen days to conduct warrantless wiretapping, but fifteen days and no longer, if he does not come to us and ask for further authority” (Cole 512). By secretly authorizing the massive wiretapping of all Americans without asking for FISA permission and its warrants, President Bush and his Administration clearly violated the rules inflicted by FISA. Sadly, President Obama makes constant efforts to keep the NSA program in secrecy by using the state secrets privilege to block the disclosure of information about NSA on the premises of endangering national security, and he relies greatly on such surveillance against Al Qaeda terrorist group.
Another reason that I find the NSA surveillance program to be unconstitutional is the violation of the Fourth Amendment right of all Americans to feel safe in their homes and to feel free from unreasonable searches and seizures of their homes. Collecting metadata on every American without any valid link to a terrorist group and without any reasonable suspicion that a person did anything wrong is completely inappropriate and illegal. Because of the unattainability to access information based on the secrecy of the program and because there are no time restrictions applied to this program based on the fact that we deal with the war on terrorism that can last for a very long time, each of us would have a recorder device on our phone, e-mail, and card transaction for the rest of our lives, and we don’t know the scope of this metadata collection and the harm that it represents to us when the executive powers decide to use it. According to Barnett, “In its briefs, the government intimates that the NSA is subjecting the data to computer analysis to reveal suspicious patterns. But others have defended the retention of this data simply to facilitate future searches of records pursuant to later investigations” (Barnett 10). I find the whole situation to be very disturbing and difficult to resolve because , as George Pike, the director of Pritzker Legal Research Center, points out, “the FISA court operates largely in secret. There are no public hearings and very few published opinions”(22). The NSA program is like “the modern day equivalent of the general warrant that strikes of the very heart of the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of particularity”(Barnett 16).
In like manner, I find the NSA surveillance program to be unconstitutional because it violates the basic right to privacy guaranteed to all Americans by the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. I completely agree with Cole when he says, “Americans clearly have very, very high expectations of privacy […] Americans want to know that they are safe in their homes and that they have the rich, autonomous, private life that nobody can intrude on” (509). The fact that people build walls and fences for their houses, the fact that people use passwords on their e-mails, phones, computers, and Web accounts show that people expect to have privacy in their lives, and they don’t want their information or their conversations to be seen or heard by others. Moreover, the fact that people sign contracts for which they pay for, either for a lease, for a bank, or for a telephone company, show that people expect the privacy assurances of these companies to be respected. They don’t want their private data or their private conversations to be shared with other parties, and this is one of the reasons they pay for these services. It is unclear how the whole situation about the NSA surveillance program will play out because, as Pike mentions, “During times in our history when foreign threats resulted in actions that challenged civil liberties in the name of security, the actions largely dissipated when the threat was resolved. It’s unlikely the war on terrorism will be resolved with something similar to V-E Day or the fall of the Berlin Wall. The challenges to rights and liberties are less readily dissipated”(22).
Equally important, the section 215 of the Patriotic Act is a slap in the face for all American citizens and their right to free speech and privacy. Section 215 expanded the jurisdiction of FISA court and allowed it to issue orders requiring the collection of any “tangible things”(Barnett 4) relevant in an investigation by the FBI, including strictly domestic calls. Basically, it allowed the metadata collection on every American from the big telecommunication companies, like Verizon, and from the big internet platform providers, like Google, Apple, Facebook, etc. According to Barnett, “I consider to be the serious constitutional problem with any such program: the fact that the NSA is demanding that private companies, with which virtually all Americans contract to provide their voice communications, turn over the records of every phone call that is made on their systems. This metadata is then stored on NSA super computers for later analysis”(3). What strikes me the most is that, by doing all this massive data collection on all Americans without specific targets, the executive powers are doing something unconstitutional because they violate the requirement of the Patriotic Act, Section 215: any order issued for this section must include a “statement of facts showing that there are tangible things sought relevant to an authorized investigation”(Barnett 4).
What can it be so relevant about all Americans that they find the need to spy on all the citizens? I look at it from the perspective that our executive powers and leaders, the same ones that were elected by the same citizens that are doing surveillance on, think of all Americans that they are potential criminals and they need to constantly spy on all of them, which I think is very wrong, and it reveals a big trust issue of the US government agencies and elected officials with the American public. It is also a big contradiction because, on one hand, the American officials say that they value the civil rights and the civil liberties, but, on the other hand, they don’t trust any of their citizens, and they go and spy on them. Moreover, it reminds me of totalitarianism practices, and it is sad that it happens in such a free and democratic country as USA. As Gaines says, “It’s clear that this administration has engaged every possible agency, from the Pentagon to NSA to the FBI, to engage on spying on Americans. You look at these documents and you think, wow, we have really returned to the days of J. Edgar Hoover”(12).
By the same token, I find the NSA surveillance program to be unconstitutional because it is based on a misinterpretation of the AUMF Act passed by Congress shortly after the terrorist attacks in 2001. To be more precise, the Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force Act in September 14, 2001, and the Bush Administration and its executive powers somehow transmuted the act into the missing statute to give permission for the NSA program. But AUMF did not explicitly mention wiretapping or surveillance, and, in my opinion, it is completely wrong to purposely alter the interpretation regarding the statute of an act to find reasons for an unlawful action. As Katyal notices, “The 2001 AUMF Act said not one word about electronic surveillance, and there is no reason to suspect that Congress had any idea that it thought it was creating an end run around FISA”(Katyal 1065).
Lastly, I find the NSA surveillance program to be unconstitutional because it causes a “chilling effect” on communication. As Wong states, “A chilling effect is a term in law which describes a situation where speech or conduct is suppressed by fear of penalization at the interests of an individual or group. It may prompt self-censorship and therefore hamper free speech’’(Wong 530). In our situation, as more and more people are aware of the widespread wiretapping program, the fear of surveillance intimidate and force the individuals to self-censor their communications. The government massive spying activities impair the public confidence and inhibit their right to openly express their ideas and beliefs. As Solove notices, “Chilling effects harm society because, among other things, they reduce the range of viewpoints expressed and the degree of freedom with which to engage in political activity”(747).
Although the NSA surveillance program came under the criticism and disapproval of many members of the press and the American public since the true nature of the program was exposed to people, it continues to exist and function in the same manner as before. It does not have to be this way, and the solution should be the introduction of mechanisms that allow the federal courts and the Supreme Court to voice their opinion regarding the surveillance program, and, once for all, to allow them to decide on the legality, jurisdiction, and the future of this program. I understand that the safety of our country is of maximum importance, but it should not be used as a general excuse to completely ignore the concerns of the American citizens about these types of surveillance. No more excuses, it is time for the courts to come clean in front of the American public, to keep their constitutional obligations as the juridical branch of this nation, and to decide the warrantless surveillance program’s legality once and for all. On top of all that, they should make the NSA program public, and they should answer any questions or worries that people may have about it.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Nsa Surveillance Program

...NSA Surveillance Program Eric D. Reeves ITT Tech Online MG517 – Ethical and Regulatory Environment Dr. Carrie A. O'Hare June 9, 2013 Abstract/Executive Summary The American people are reaping what they sow.  They were so eager to have any semblance of security after 9/11, that they allowed the Patriot Act to be rammed through Congress and signed into law all in a matter of days despite warnings from critics that it could be used to infringe upon citizens’ rights. NSA Surveillance Program has been in the news over the past week.  It was revealed Wednesday June 5, 2013 in The Guardian that the NSA had requested the phone records of millions of Version’s customers regardless of whether they were suspected of suspicious activity or not. In addition it seems that other carriers are requesting similar information. * Introduction: This week millions of Americans was informed by The Guardian of a top-secret government order that was approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, requiring that Verizon release and hand over millions of Americans’ phone records to the national Security Agency. Of course this information made many Americans uncomfortable and people started freaking out. Then the Washington Post reported that not only has the government been keeping an eye on whom we call, when, and how long we talk to them, but it’s also been tapping into the servers of nine major U.S. Internet companies and collecting emails, photos, videos, documents, and...

Words: 2521 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Electronic Surveillance

...Ethics in the Government and Public Sector in Electronic Surveillance “Can you hear me now, Yes I can even see you” Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Abstract In todays society the number of computers, tablets, mobile devices will rise to about 65 billion devices connecting to the internet. That not counting vehicles, household applicances, gaming devices. However, with all of these deveices there is a significant benfit that will make our lives easier and one potential theat that invades our privacy called Geolocational Privacy and Surveillance (GPS). This sometimes hidden or masked feature is colleting our personal information, location and sometimes converstation. Laws have have enmpowered government and companies to collect databases of consumers without our consent. With ongoing technology where does the protection beging and the surveillance stop. Ethics in the Government and Public Sector in Electronic Surveillance In the movie Enemy of the State the lawyer played by Will Smith becomes a target by a corrupt politican who kills a congressman for his unwillingness to help with a new surveillance system with satellites. The politican with the help of National Security Aministration agents to destroy the lawyers life by manipulation thru the internet and surveillance. This movie was produced in 1998 and then the technological devices we have now were not that advanced. Little did we know that would become the norm of everyday life of those who......

Words: 1919 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Case Study

...Maham ashfaq 16020248 Junaid sirat Comparative law Edward Snowden. Born in North Carolina in 1983, Edward Snowden worked for the National Security Agency through subcontractor Booz Allen in the NSA's Oahu office. While working there, Snowden began noticing government programs involving the NSA spying on American citizens via phone calls and internet use. Before long, leaving his very comfortable life and $200,000 salary behind, in May 2013, Snowden began copying top-secret NSA documents while at work, building a record of practices that he found invasive and alarming. The documents contained enormous and pejorative information on the NSA's domestic surveillance practices, including spying on millions of American citizens under the name of programs such as PRISM. (Edward Snowden biography) Snowden later forwarded these documents to journalists, from where on June 5th Guardian newspaper released those secret documents about an American intelligence body (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court) demanding that Verizon release information on a daily basis gathered from its American customers activities. Also the Guardian and the Washington Times released Snowden's leaked information on PRISM, a NSA program that allows real-time information collection, in this case, solely information on American citizens. Snowden now lives in Russia. One of his lawyers, Anatoly Kucherena, gave an interview with CBS News. Kucherena said that Snowden would seek temporary asylum in Russia......

Words: 533 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Nsa Ethics of Mass Surveillance

...The Ethics of the NSA Mass-Surveillance Program University Name Student Name Course Number/Name Professor Name Date Introduction One of the most explosive scandals of the 21st century was involved the National Security Agency (NSA), and the revelations that the agency had set up a robust, warrantless mass surveillance program in the years after the 9/11 attacks. Designed to pick up bits of intelligence that could be used in order to thwart future 9/11 attacks, critics of the program argued that not only was it unconstitutional given the lack of warrants obtained prior to engaging in the program, but that it was ineffective at stopping any kind of real terrorism. Supporters pushed back that the program was an essential tool for fighting terrorists who had become more advanced digitally, often using the internet in order to communicate with each other. Much of the discussion on the program related to the ethical appropriateness of the NSA’s activities. This paper will summarize the NSA’s surveillance program and discuss it from the perspective of utilitarianism and Kantian ethics; in addition, the paper will discuss the author’s personal viewpoint of the program. Summary of the Program The NSA spying program, named the “Terrorist Surveillance Program” by the New York Times, focused on monitoring the communications of between 500 and 1000 people within the United States with suspected ties to Al-Qaeda (Dunn, 2015). Many of these individuals were American citizens,...

Words: 1335 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Has the Nsa's Surveillance Impacted the Economy?

...How Has the NSA'S Surveillance Impacted the Economy? Southern New Hampshire University English 123: Composition II How Has the NSA'S Surveillance Impacted the Economy? Introduction The Guardian aired a report on the surveillance programs of the National Security Agency over one year ago. The report based on leaked information from one of the agency’s contractors named Edward Snowden. The national opinions from several interested parties concentrates on simplistic debates evaluating the tradeoff between individual privacy and national security. However, it is an important time for the government and other stakeholders to begin weighing the benefits and costs associated with the surveillance more carefully. In spite of the strong defense by intelligence officials in favor of the NSA programs, the officials fail to table any credible evidence in support of the benefits they suggest. In fact, some initial analysis of the programs indicates that the benefits are dubious. It is true that the United States is a target for terrorist and other malicious groups, state officials often use the threat as an excuse to conduct and promote the activities of the National Security Agency. It may be beneficial in the context of security, but the surveillance programs also jeopardize the activities and operations of other organizations and individuals within the United States. The impact of the activities of the NSA on other parties is a cause for an analysis of the economic effects......

Words: 1851 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Who Is Edward Snowden?

...Who is Edward Snowden? Edward Snowden, 30, was a three-month employee of a government consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton. At Booz Allen (he has since been terminated), he worked as a systems administrator at an NSA Threat Operations Center in Hawaii, one of several facilities detect threats against government computer systems. In other words, he was a low-level intelligence government contractor. Background: Edward Joseph Snowden was born June 21, 1983, he grew up in Wilmington, N.C., but later moved to Ellicott City, Md., he told The Guardian. His mother, Wendy, is the chief deputy clerk for administration and information technology at the federal court in Baltimore, a court official told NBC News. His father, Lonnie, is a former Coast Guard officer who lives in Pennsylvania, the Allentown Morning Call reported. A neighbor said he has an older sister who is an attorney. Education: He did not complete high school. He told The Guardian that he studied computers at a community college and obtained a general equivalency degree. A spokesman for Anne Arundel Community College confirmed that a student with the same name and birth date took classes there, from 1999 to 2001 and again in 2004 and 2005. Military service: He spent four months in the Army reserves, from May to September 2004 as a special forces recruit to a 14-week training course, the Army said. "He did not complete any training or receive any awards," an Army statement said. No other details were......

Words: 1691 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

National Security Should Be More Important

...evil NSA team conducting illegal surveillance on a labor lawyer Robert, who was supposed to have a videotape of a politically motivated murder. Robert’s life was peaceful and happy until he suddenly met his college friend Zavitz in a shop, who passed the videotape secretly to him. Ever since that moment, Robert’s life was turned upside down. A special team in NSA soon discovered that he might have the videotape, and then the team raided his house and planted surveillance devices in order to find the videotape. His every movement was tracked and every word was tapped, which destroyed Robert’s life: he was fired from his work, his bank accounts were frozen, his wife threw him out of home since photos about his meeting former girlfriend were sent to his wife. After stumbling around for a bit trying to figure out what's happening to him, Robert turned to Brill for help, who turns out be an ex-NSA agent and who was responsible for inventing some of the surveillance devices. Together, they fought the NSA using the same techniques used against them, and finally Robert got rid of all his accusation and went back to his peaceful life again. Although the plot of the movie might look like a little Hollywood style, the surveillance tools feathered in the movie, such as, phone wiretapping, Global Positioning System, voice and face recognition system, and some much advanced ones, are generally in use today. Apparently, the movie puts strong criticism on the abuse of such surveillance......

Words: 1714 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Ethics of Wiretapping

...Philosophy 203 – Introduction to Ethics August 7, 2015 ETHICS OF WIRETAPPING Since the First World War, government has been known to use private companies to wiretap phone lines for information. The legal structures, established by the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), have defined a framework for legally securing a warrant for searches and tapping into phone lines of the American populace. Sometimes the government uses warrantless wiretapping without proper authorization and it exposes telecommunications companies to legal and financial ramifications. What I will argue in this paper is that warrantless wiretapping is unlawful and not ethical, as it harms citizens and violates their privacy. My position is that it is not violation of personal liberties and is immoral for the NSA to have access data when your average citizen is not a threat. Not completely following this law pertaining to wiretapping deviates from the natural check and balance system of the federal government. The failure to procure a warrant when wiretapping violates the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, and provokes media criticism. The National Security Administration (NSA) and other government agencies are required to wiretap only with the direct written authority of the FISA-assembled courts through a signed warrant. In rare cases, however, such as an imminent terror plot, against the government should it be allowed to intervene. The......

Words: 1118 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Persuasion, Politics, and Propaganda

...Persuasion, Politics and Propaganda Teneal Rusnak COM/400 September 9, 2014 Margaret Garberina, Ph.D. Persuasion, Politics and Propaganda An issue that seems to raise some concerns in our society would be the National Security Agency (NSA) not only spying on people in our country but also other countries by wiretapping and keeping surveillance on certain people. There have been a number of different laws that have been instated that help to protect our privacy such as the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Acts of 1968 which acknowledged that there were extensive amounts of wiretapping that seemed to be going on without any sort of legal sanctions and without the consent of anyone involved. With this law it helped to protect innocent people and stated that wiretapping should only be allowed only when authorized by the court and should therefore remain under the supervision of the court throughout its duration. However, in 1968 our technology was not as advanced as it is now so this law went through many significant changes over the next forty plus years. By 1986 a new amendment had been written in response to the ever-changing technological advances. The 1968 law only protected individuals who communicated through telephone calls. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 took it a step further to focus primarily on any email that would be transmitted as well as stored in any type of storage device. The biggest improvement......

Words: 1843 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Spying of the Nsa, Public Speaking Report

...Spying of the NSA The past year we all have heard of the NSA spying through social media, phones and all sorts of stuff, we heard of this because of Edward Snowden, an ex CIA- system analyst. He exposed their spying and this has resulted in to a global issue. Because the spying is wrong on so many levels we are here to convince you that what the NSA is doing is wrong. *attention grabber* So now that I have your attention I will continue. Main Point 1: How is it possible that the NSA is spying on civilians? Sub Point 1: What is the NSA; I’m going to begin by telling you a little about what the NSA is. The NSA better known as the National Security Agency is the main producer and manager of the signals intelligence for the United States. The NSA is responsible for the protection of U.S. government. The NSA is tasked with monitoring on targeted individuals in the U.S. But the NSA doesn’t just spy on targeted individuals; they spy on every U.S. citizen, they even spy on world leaders. They can spy on anyone around the world, and they can do this through social media, the internet and phones. I will explain this in more detail later. Ok so now that I’ve talked about what the NSA is, I will tell you guys how it is possible that the NSA is spying on us. Well to begin, the NSA spying program started back when George Bush was the president of the United States, the spying started right after nine eleven, this was in 2001 and that is 13 years ago so consider how long they......

Words: 1852 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Internet Surveillance

...government agencies and corporations, but also hackers willing to risk a prison sentence. In 2013, NSA whistle blower Edward Snowden revealed previously unknown details of global surveillance programs run by the United States' NSA in close cooperation with three partners: Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The documents leaked by Mr. Snowden revealed details about the NSA secretly tapping into Yahoo and Google data centers to collect information from millions of accounts worldwide. The shocking evidenced released by Mr. Snowden reveals that lawmakers and politicians should take greater control over how and why they are using their surveillance technologies, and question whether or not the fight against terrorism justifies the use of these surveillance programs on citizens as well. Furthermore, it is important to ensure that there be continued innovation in internet security in order to create services and products which can counter-act the use of these programs on ordinary citizens who don’t want their data accessible to anyone but themselves. Spying agencies are able to cripple the civil liberties and the right to privacy of citizens, therefore it is imperative that the government protect the rights of citizens through reforms on Surveillance Acts, but it is also equally pertinent for citizens take initiative and push for new reforms and innovation in online security. Surveillance is defined as the “monitoring of people and systems in order to regulate their......

Words: 1527 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Edward Snowden Case Study

...significance of ethics has been expanding quickly. The ethics are morals, qualities and standards utilized by a person to perform one’s own decisions. These qualities are considered by the people for their basic leadership. This paper represents the case study of Edward Snowden who is a defense contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, leaked very confidential information about the activities of USA’s National Security Agency (NSA). In June 2013, Snowden confessed to passing characterized records to columnists at The Guardian and The Washington Post—revealing the details of NSA observation programs that gather and perform information mining on a huge number of U.S. telephone calls and Internet...

Words: 1308 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay


...Data Collection and Surveillance Andrew John Martin UNCW Computer Science Department Abstract The purpose of the research is to see if the mass collection and surveillance of U.S citizens legal and ethical. The goal is to have a better understanding of the how data is collected, and the what the Fourth Amendment means. This is done by examining several aspects of the Fourth Amendment, and recent articles on the NSA. Upon examination, it becomes clear that the NSA is indeed breaching the rights of lawful U.S citizens. Through showing that the Fourth Amendment protects the U.S citizens against such actions. Key Words: NSA, Fourth, Amendment, warrant, PRISM, Edward, Snowden. The NSA collects millions of American phone, internet, and personal information. They do this by using a system call PRISM which allows them to collect this data through several different internet websites. However, many believe this is in complete violation of the Fourth Amendment which protects against unwarranted searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect......

Words: 2486 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Nsa Surveillance

...Sharath Thomas Professor Hugetz ENGL 1301.08 05 April 2016 NSA Surveillance - Constitutional or Unconstitutional The US Constitution came to life 230 years ago, but recent actions of the National Security Agency is interpreted to be defying the Bill of Rights by the government and depriving the citizens their constitutional right to privacy. However, when posed with the question: Do people want to live in a surveillanced environment like animals in a zoo, with justice and safety ensured but privacy denied completely ? , the answers vary in the community. The revelation of the National Security Agency's massive surveillance of American citizens has prompted a debate about the constitutionality of the agency's actions. The policies of the the National Security Agency is said to be conflicting with the basic right of privacy guaranteed to citizens in the Fourth Amendment. The "metadata" collection carried out by the National Security Agency, including all kinds of personal records and assets along with a list of phone calls and electronic messages poses a challenge to the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Eavesdropping on people is a loaded feature of NSA: " It specializes in pretty much one thing, and that's eavesdropping on communications around the world, whether it's e-mail, cell phones, regular telephones--any kind of communications--and......

Words: 1025 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Data Mning

...As the world’s largest non-alcoholic beverage company, Coca-Cola generates petabytes of data from various sources. Multi-channel retail data, customer profile data from loyalty programs, social media data, supply chain data, competitor data, sales and shipment data from bottling partners as well as transaction and merchandising data. Coca-cola collects vast amounts of data and they take a refreshing approach in exploiting that data and deriving value from it. Chief Big Data Insights Officer, Esat Sezer, explains that Coca-Cola takes a strategic approach instead of a tactical approach with big data. They use the vast amount of available data sets to change the way they approach IT. They have embraced big data technologies and as such were able to create a shared services centre for their financial transactional activities as well as an employee service centre for HR activities. They moved from a decentralized approach to a centralized approach, where the data is combined centrally and available via the shared platforms across the organization. In addition, Coca-Cola has almost 70 million Facebook followers and big data enables Coca-Cola to connect to these followers better and be able to grow the brand advocacy. Coca-Cola also leverages Point of Sales data from companies like Walmart (Walmart alone is responsible for $ 4 billion in Coca-Cola sales annually) to build customer profiles, create centralized iPad reporting across the company and enable Collaborative Planning,......

Words: 2706 - Pages: 11