.List (at least) 3 important facts that the author uses to support the main idea of the article.

1. research in the last few years has consistently shown that all this avoidance often does more harm than good. In many cases, we need to be doing the opposite.
2.Researchers enrolled 640 infants at high risk for allergies, between 4 and 11 months of age, in a trial and randomized them to one of two groups...
Children who had proven sensitivity to peanuts, but consumed them in their diet regularly, were less likely to develop a peanut allergy than children without sensitivity who avoided them.
3. In September 2015, the A.A.P. - along with others— argued that “health care providers should recommend introducing peanut-containing products into the diets of ‘high-risk’ infants early on in life.”

. Why are the issues raised important? …show more content…
And, for what they are saying now that isn't like that at all. instead, We should consume them so that we don't get any allergy and to prove that they made an experiment with children. It is really important for us to know this information so everybody can spread this information and try to inform all mother and mothers to be about this. People can make a difference with their children if they introduce peanuts in the diet as soon as they begin eating solid foods. If what they discovered is done and has no side effects then maybe we could have found a way to decline the number of people with a peanuts