Premium Essay

Omam

In: English and Literature

Submitted By ritashah
Words 783
Pages 4
The issue of sexism was very present in the 1930s compared to how it is now. Steinbeck’s use of the character of Curley’s Wife is the only female character in the novella. Steinbeck uses different methods to diminish the importance of Curley’s wife

Steinbeck never gives Curley’s Wife a name. This is done to show that she does not have any identity or position on the ranch. As Curley’s Wife is a representation of all women in the 1930s I feel Steinbeck uses her to show that she does not have any identity or position on the ranch. As Curley’s Wife is a representation of all women in the 1930s I feel Steinbeck uses her to show that most women back then had no identity or position in the working world.

Steinbeck uses methods of introduction to show the reader the hardships of women in the 1930s. Steinbeck never introduces Curley’s Wife throughout the novella. I feel Steinbeck does this to show that although to the reader she is an important character, she is insignificant in the 1930s society. However Curley’s wife upon meeting George and Lennie never introduces herself. This shows that the character herself feels insignificant in society. She feels that she is unwanted and no one cares for her so no one would need to know her name. Curely’s Wife is also only introduced to other people as “Curley’s Wife”, I think that Steinbeck does this to show that Curley, her husband, is in possession of her, like so many other women in 1930 in other situations.

No characters in the novella care for Curley’s Wife and very little attention is given to her. However many of the men only see her as an object. I think Steinbeck conveys that idea by his description of her. When we and George and Lennie are first introduced to her, Steinbeck takes a long time to describe her. ‘She had full rouged lips and wide-spaced eyes, heavily made up. Her finger nails were red....

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Of Mice And Men Character Analysis Essay

...OMAM After all the years George and Lennie have been going through together, “[George] pulls the trigger” to end Lennie’s life (Steinbeck 106). In Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, George and Lennie, who is mentally handicapped, travel together finding work. Both of them have a dream of owning land together and getting rabbits to let Lennie tend. Lennie and George have previously been kicked out of Weed because of an incident having to do with Lennie grabbing onto a woman’s dress. Lennie is constantly getting in trouble because of his bad judgement. George and Lennie then arrive to a new ranch to work at. Curley’s wife is a beautiful woman who is searching for attention because of the lack of attention from her husband, Curley. Lennie is unaware of his own strength, kills a pup and then does not know what to do. He thinks that George will be mad at him and not let him tend to the rabbits. Curley’s wife talks to Lennie and lets him touch her hair because it is soft. When she starts to panic, so does Lennie. He grabs tighter and tells her not to yell because George might hear and get mad. While just trying to cover her mouth, Lennie accidentally breaks her neck and kills her. Lennie runs away and George and the other men from the ranch find him. George...

Words: 642 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Explore the Ways in Which Steinbeck Presents Curley’s Wife as a Minor Character Within the Novel of Mice and Men.

...Curley’s wife is a minor character in the novel, ‘Of Mice and Men’ (OMAM), the author, John Steinbeck uses a variety of techniques to present her as such. Steinbeck does this to make the reader form different opinions of the character, which gradually change as the story continues. One of the techniques Steinbeck uses is structure, even prior to meeting Curley’s wife the reader is forced to form a negative opinion of her character. This is important structurally as it gives a sense of foreshadowing and foreboding. Candy, the old ranch hand, tell us “… purty… but-“ the ‘but’ tells us a lot more than ‘purty’ does as all ‘purty’ tells us is that Curley’s wife is pretty whereas ‘but’ is purposely left open so that the reader, and George in the novel, may form a negative opinion of her character because that is the only reason why Candy is hesitant to finish his sentence as he would still be wary of George after only meeting him a short while ago. Forcing the reader to think negatively of and judge Curley’s wife is important as it gives the reader subtle hints as to her role in the outcome of the story. Light is used frequently as a symbol of hope in the novel and Curley’s wife is often shown as an obstacle between the men of the ranch and the idea of the American Dream, which is to have their own ranch and live off ‘the fatta the lan’’. “… the rectangle of sunshine in the doorway was cut off” – a ‘rectangle of sunshine’ represents the hope and it being described as a......

Words: 1043 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Role Of Euthanasia In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

...Also how the “feeble minded” were treated in the time of OMAM ultimately led to George choosing to kill Lennie. This is left unresolved because of the issue of people believing that the doctors are killing people. It is a very sore subject because some people see it as they should live out their lives no matter what. And others see Euthanasia as a way to end people’s suffering if they are terminally ill. Also some people can see it as killing someone so they don’t have to pay for the care of them in a hospital. They would rather just find a cheap alternative to taking care of them. People should care about this topic because this could be them someday or someone of their loved ones that are very ill asking for nothing more than just to end their pain somehow. And the only way to end their pain...

Words: 1120 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Does Priestley Present Mr Birling

...1. he predicts it's Curley for OMAM, Mr Birling for AIC -Steinbeck can use the theme of fate to present Curley. - Curley does not have to work hard like the others but still holds power because he is the Boss's son. - Curley picked a fight with Lennie. Lennie hurt Curley. George asks slim "Slim, is Curleys old man gonna can us?" George is worried as Curley has authority because he is the Boss's son.  - Curley is said to be evil and was born with authority. - Steinbeck uses Curley to highlight the American Dream. No matter how hard you work success only comes to those who are fated to receive it. This links to the theme of fate. And his fate has brought him power and authority because of what he can do and because he is the Boss's son. he predicts it's Curley for OMAM, Mr Birling for AIC -Steinbeck can use the theme of fate to present Curley. - Curley does not have to work hard like the others but still holds power because he is the Boss's son. - Curley picked a fight with Lennie. Lennie hurt Curley. George asks slim "Slim, is Curleys old man gonna can us?" George is worried as Curley has authority because he is the Boss's son.  - Curley is said to be evil and was born with authority. - Steinbeck uses Curley to highlight the American Dream. No matter how hard you work success only comes to those who are fated to receive it. This links to the theme of fate. And his fate has brought him power and authority because of what he can do and because he is the Boss's son. ...

Words: 3850 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Essay

...GENEROLO JONO ŽEMAIČIO LIETUVOS KARO AKADEMIJA Genovaitė LAUGALIENĖ Milda MIRONAITĖ MOKOMASIS ANGLŲ – LIETUVIŲ IR LIETUVIŲ – ANGLŲ KALBŲ KARYBOS ŽODYNAS Eksperimentinis leidinys Vilnius 2008 UDK 355(03)=20=882 La-458 Mokomąjį anglų – lietuvių ir lietuvių – anglų kalbų karybos žodyną parengė Generolo Jono Žemaičio Lietuvos karo akademijos Užsienio kalbų instituto direktorė Genovaitė Laugalienė ir Užsienio kalbų instituto Užsienio kalbų katedros lektorė Milda Mironaitė. Atsakingoji redaktorė Užsienio kalbų instituto Užsienio kalbų katedros lektorė Aušra Bučaitė. Recenzavo Generolo Jono Žemaičio Lietuvos karo akademijos viršininko pavaduotojas doc. dr. Pranas Jankauskas, Užsienio kalbų instituto Anglų kalbos mokymo centro viršininkas vyr. ltn. Andrius Kiesas ir Lietuvos kariuomenės Mokymo ir doktrinų valdybos Individualiojo rengimo skyriaus Anglų kalbos mokymo poskyrio vedėja Aušra Narbutienė. © Genovaitė Laugalienė, 2008 © Milda Mironaitė, 2008 © Generolo Jono Žemaičio Lietuvos karo akademija, 2008 Turinys Pratarmė......................................................................................................................... 4 . Angliški ir lietuviški sutrumpinimai ............................................................................ 5 Anglų – lietuvių kalbų karybos žodynas........................................................................ 7 Lietuvių – anglų kalbų karybos žodynas ....................................

Words: 111618 - Pages: 447

Premium Essay

Work, Culture and Identity in Mozambique and Southafrica 1860-1910

...Acknowledgments ix Acknowledgments This book owes a great deal to the mental energy of several generations of scholars. As an undergraduate at the University of Cape Town, Francis Wilson made me aware of the importance of migrant labour and Robin Hallett inspired me, and a generation of students, to study the African past. At the School of Oriental and African Studies in London I was fortunate enough to have David Birmingham as a thesis supervisor. I hope that some of his knowledge and understanding of Lusophone Africa has found its way into this book. I owe an equal debt to Shula Marks who, over the years, has provided me with criticism and inspiration. In the United States I learnt a great deal from ]eanne Penvenne, Marcia Wright and, especially, Leroy Vail. In Switzerland I benefitted from the friendship and assistance of Laurent Monier of the IUED in Geneva, Francois Iecquier of the University of Lausanne and Mariette Ouwerhand of the dépurtement évangélrlyue (the former Swiss Mission). In South Africa, Patricia Davison of the South African Museum introduced me to material culture and made me aware of the richness of difference; the late Monica Wilson taught me the fundamentals of anthropology and Andrew Spiegel and Robert Thornton struggled to keep me abreast of changes in the discipline; Sue Newton-King and Nigel Penn brought shafts of light from the eighteenthcentury to bear on early industrialism. Charles van Onselen laid a major part of the intellectual foundations......

Words: 178350 - Pages: 714