Free Essay


In: Other Topics

Submitted By Gaurav01
Words 4514
Pages 19
[Marketing Consultancy Report]
[Marketing Consultancy Report]

Table of Contents
Introduction …………………………………………………………………………..1
Market & Competition……………………………………………………………….5
SWOT Analysis………………………………………………………………………..6
Porter’s Five Forces…………………………………………………………………..7
The Ansoff Matrix……………………………………………………………………..8
Product & Service……………………………………………………………………10
Promotional Strategy……………………………………………………………….12
Price Strategy…………………………………………………………………………14
Place & Distribution……………………..…………………………………………15

OpenTable is an American public company, slated to be a wholly owned subsidiary of, that offers online real-time restaurant-reservation service. The firm provides online reservations at about 31,000 upscale restaurants around the world seating some 15 million diners a month.
The service allows users to search for restaurants and reservations based on parameters including times, dates, cuisine and price range. Users who have registered their email address with the system will then receive a confirmation email. Users can also receive OpenTable rewards points after dining (100 or 1,000); these points can be redeemed for discounts at member restaurants. The company also has a mobile application available in Apple's App Store, Blackberry App World, Google Play, Windows Phone Marketplace and Palm App Catalog that allows users to find and book dinner reservations. The company's home market consists of the United States, however, it has expanded in recent years to include markets including Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico and the United Kingdom. On October 1, 2010, the company acquired (TopTable), a restaurant reservation site in the UK. On January 29, 2013, the company announced that it entered a definitive agreement to acquire Foodspotting. On June 13, 2014 the company agreed to a takeover offer by at $2.6 billion. Both companies said OpenTable would continue to operate as a separate business under the same management.
Decide a restaurant can be sometimes a very difficult task. What kind of food do we want? What’s on the menu? How expensive is it? Is it nearby? And many other questions that we have before going to any restaurant. Opentable aims to give a solution to this problem by providing “a fast, efficient way to find available tables that meet the desired criteria for type of food, price and location at a specified time.” But what really makes OpenTable unique is that it allows customers to make reservations online, making it a one-stop shop for all your dining needs. The success of the business is undeniable, as OpenTable has seated over 200 million people since its launch in 1998, and it keeps growing fast as five million people now turn to OpenTable every month.
Its main calling card is the Electronic Reservation Book which is a touch-screen system positioned at the restaurant’s host stand to replace the traditional reservation book. It serves to manage reservations, assign tables, recognize repeat diners, and remember preferences making online reservations possible linking real time availability with the Internet. Opentable also offers the option of making the reserve through restaurant´s own websites.
OpenTable is leading the online reservation market. Citigroup analysts estimate the company has more than a 90 percent market share in the U.S. online reservation business and they think that there is stillroom to grow. The company works in all fifty states and also in Canada, Germany, Japan, Mexico, and the United Kingdom. Their main competitor now is the phone reservation but it is a matter of time that the new technologies will replace this old method of booking a table.
In 2010-2011, OpenTable has increased its revenue by 53% up to $34.3 million. They have also expanded the number of restaurants they work with to 60% more and seated 53% more diners also during this period. These numbers all contributed to a consolidated net income of $6.3 million for the second quarter in 2011, while still having cash and short term-investments totaling $69.1 million, demonstrating sound financial footing.
OpenTable has two main types of competitors: online reservation ones and coupon ones. OpenTable’s main business has been the online reservation one, but it has recently started a service called Limelight that dabbles in the coupon business, stepping on the toes of the likes of Groupon and OpenTable has partnered with coupon dealer Savored, which offers discounts on dinner reservations to compete against Spotlight, which offers weekly gift certificates. And on the reservation side there are two more competitors: Urbanspoon that launched its own service called Rezbook (that directly competes with them, but it currently only has 800 restaurants) and Google that purchased Zagat (the restaurant rating service) in 2011, leading some to speculate that it would attempt to enter the reservation business as well.
With the appearance of all these new competitors; OpenTable is beginning to lose its competitive advantage as its service is no longer unique, it has been imitated, and there are emerging almost substitute products. In today´s world, it is very difficult to maintain the competitive advantage, so OpenTable must be ready to innovate in order to remain ahead.
OpenTable was founded in 1998 by Chuck Templeton and headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was incorporated on September 20, 2000. It was made to offer online accessibility for restaurant reservations through a web platform. Their website was launched in 1999 which allowed users to reserve tables online at their convenience to a limited selection of restaurants in San Francisco at the time. Since then, it has expanded to cover over 31,000 restaurants in the United States and also, internationally. The company had its initial public offering (IPO) on May 21, 2009 and listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange under the ticker symbol: OPEN. The underwriters were Merrill Lynch, Allen & Company, Stifel Nicolaus and Think Equity LLC. In 2010, OpenTable acquired, a reservation website based in UK for an estimated $55 million. By April 2012, OpenTable was available as an application on Kindle Fire, which seated diners in the United States, Canada, Germany, Japan, Mexico and the United Kingdom. In June 2013, the company had acquired JustChalo Inc. and in August 2013, the company announced that it acquired Rezbook which is Urbanspoon’s reservation management system for restaurants. On June 13, 2014 the company was bought by an online travel company,, for a 2.6 billion cash deal and was said to be operating as an independent business led by the management team under The Priceline Group offices in San Francisco.

Market & Customers
OpenTable makes their money by charging restaurants a one-time installation fee for reservation software/hardware, a monthly subscription fee, and a fee for each diner seated through the service. A higher fee of $1/diner booked directly through the company’s website compared to $0.25/diner booked through the restaurant’s website is an indicator of the value of OpenTable’s website as a customer referral tool. Therefore, this suggests that OpenTable is twice as effective as a marketing tool rather than through independent online reservations.
OpenTable provides an ERB (Electronic Reservation Book) touchscreen software that provides a real-time map of free tables in each restaurant floor, stores meal patterns for all parties, keeps a database of diners, helps maximize guest seating, attracts repeat business with email marketing, offers a rewards point system for loyal customers and saves time with automated reservations.
Though restaurants would have to pay a fee to utilize their online booking system, the service is free to diners. OpenTable has seated 25 million diners across 8,090 restaurants, at an average of 345 seats monthly or 14 seats daily per restaurant. It has 25,000 restaurant clients and seats 9 million customers per month. It is currently the market leader in the US and reported significantly profitable compared to their international locations in Germany, Japan and the United Kingdom, which only represents 5% of their total revenues.

SWOT Analysis
* Monopoly - Harder for competitors to take over as most restaurants have built a huge customer database with OpenTable. It would be challenging and inconvenient for restaurants to switch systems. * Wide coverage in U.S and internationally.
* Upcoming alternative - Cloud based system, IPad applications, Text/mail notifications for diners * High charges to customers - Other competitors providing cheaper costs and options * Very Saturated market - Lack of motivation in innovation to improve products and services. There is not much room for them to improve, as they don’t have any substantial competition. A company would have to be financially well supported, intuitive, and innovative and have a very solid and disruptive business model to provide competition for OpenTable.
* Enhancing Mobile Experience * Internalization * Exploring Blue Ocean * Strengthen and grow existing markets

Threats * Rise of new competition - New alternatives * Restaurant owner dissatisfaction - According to a blog written by Mark Pastore, there have been complaints on the restaurants’ behalf due to the fees they have to pay for OpenTable’s service. The income made is disproportionate to the money made paid to OpenTable. However, restaurants also feel a huge dependency on OpenTable as they don’t have a choice to discontinue the service either as it would reduce their customer base. * Lower priced competitors
Porter’s Five Forces
Bargaining Power of Suppliers - Rely on third-party service providers with various development and quality assurance related services Bargaining Power of Customers * Dinners: Decision to be a user’s or not depends on quality of user experience * Restaurants: If number substitute increases higher leverage to bargain on price of ERB
Competitive Rivalry * Direct Competition (with similar services): Online restaurant reservation.

* Indirect competition: * Restaurants review websites * Food delivery services * Offline restaurant information sources
Threat of New Entrants - Low barrier to entry into the table management solution market can result in intensified competition
Threat of Substitutes * Actual: Phone reservations * Potential: Introduction of a superior reservation management software by a competitor
The Ansoff Matrix
Using Ansoff’s Matrix, we analyzed OpenTable’s four different growth strategies and growth possibilities to determine the best form of recommendations for OpenTable to move forward.
Market Penetration Strategies (Existing Market, Existing Product): * The promotion of OpenTable’s website provides an alternative to their apps and an availability to other diners who use search engines to look for restaurants and online ratings and reviews on restaurants. * They provide potential restaurant clients with personalized selling and business advice through door-to-door sales force with OpenTable’s team of sales representatives by promoting their ERB system. * Working with other partners or companies like Yelp, Google and other partners allows OpenTable to cover all sources and forms of potential customers.
Product Development strategies (Existing Market, New Product): * Acquisition of major players in food delivery applications such as Eat 24 and Seamless would allow OpenTable to widen their scope in the Food and Beverage industry. * By further enhancing the dining experience of customers, OpenTable could provide an option for diners to preferred seating choices and pre-order options to reduce wait times. * Working on continuous improvements of OpenTable’s online reservation software could help maintain their network security and sustainability in order to avoid their reputation from being harmed. * Big Data: By gathering and utilizing personal data from diners such as providing customer surveys at the end of each reservation booking. This will provide opportunities for customization of their service according to diner’s needs.
Market Development Strategies (New Market, Existing Product): * Direct sales to new restaurants through cheaper software alternatives such as Opentable’s ‘Connect’ system that targets other restaurants who rely on walk-in customers. * Incentives such as providing OpenTable coupons or credit for online restaurant reviewers and dining rewards for frequent users could encourage and attract potential diners with their potential benefits. * Further international expansion by creating brand awareness and effective communication strategy to encourage areas/regions of infrequent diners to dine out more.
Diversification strategies (New Market, New Product): * Extend into other segments of food & beverage market to become the primary leader of that market by dominating all areas of the food industry therefore, widening their reach. * Partnerships with food delivery service industry such as Eat24, Grubhub and Orderahead could help widen their clientele in the food industry. * Sponsorships with famous food bloggers could extend their brand awareness through word-of-mouth. * Diversification of apps and their features allows greater functionality and * accessibility for diners on-the-go.
Product & Service
OpenTable is a leading service provider of instant online restaurant reservations for diners and reservation management systems for restaurants. The actual product is a software which delivers the convenience of booking reservations online to diners as well as the functionality of a computerized reservation system to restaurants. The augmented product is now a combination of subscription and reservation revenue:
Revenue Model * Reservation Revenue: The Company charges each restaurant $1 for every seated diner that books a reservation on * The Subscription Fees, is charged to restaurants for using OpenTable’s electronic booking system.
Product Features * Mobile Payment: OpenTable gives opportunity to diners to pay directly from their phone, reducing the wait time to pay for the check. * Ratings & Reviews: Diner’s are able to share their experience and rate restaurants. Brand Role Play - OpenTable has the credibility as being the pioneer for providing such logistics for restaurants. Restaurants know that OpenTable has the current largest reach of potential customers and therefore want to use them. Having seated over 200 million dinners in 20 k restaurants all over the world shows the reliability in their brand.
Product Life Cycle - OpenTable should be towards the later stages of growth and slowly transitioning into the maturity period. This is because despite being at a whopping 2.6 billion dollars there is a very big opportunity to further expand the brand worldwide especially after being acquired by Priceline. This allows them to have a bigger client base and considering how the world is slowly moving towards an app based dependency OpenTable has the world at their shoulders. Despite almost having monopoly of the market which could suggest they are already in the maturity stage, they have not had competitors that can give them a run for their money and none can compete with the opportunity for a much wider and deeper global expansion.
Objectives - The product line objectives is selling the reach of their software and database which is 2nd to none. They are able to charge premium prices due to their relative monopoly and reliability of their application.
Promotional Strategy
The business strategy significantly revolves around the promotion of the OpenTable website and it’s Electronic Reserve Book (ERB).Online restaurant reviewers were given monetary benefits upon providing links to the OpenTable website, however this form of advertising was not cost-efficient and although new visitors were increasingly brought to use the website, the cost far outweighed the revenue brought in through this strategy.
Following changes in management, the importance of personal selling and public relations grew as a door-to-door sales force was formed, targeting mostly expensive restaurants. OpenTable has a team of sales representatives that promote the ERB system to potential restaurants and also participate in numerous trade shows and conference to promote the system. This form of advertising and promotion was more effective as the concept spread to 50 states in the United States of America, as well as to over 1,000 restaurants elsewhere in the world. This form of personal selling is, indeed appropriate as it has increased the subscription rates and income of the company. In a world of a cold, emotionless digital surface, the presence of personalized connections, especially in terms of selling the product and also the follow up customer service, could clarify any doubts that an F.A.Q. tab cannot, while possibly gaining the trust of potential clients and restaurateurs. In this sense, there seems to be a proper balance between contemporary media and traditional forms.
However, if traditional media were categorized as mostly print media, OpenTable does not seem to have any investment in advertising through traditional media. Regardless of this lack of presence in traditional media, OpenTable is indeed a digital product and as such, the imbalance in media choices are appropriate and well-thought of because users of the product are mostly digital media users. Also, considering also the fact that traditional media would most probably incur more cost than effectiveness, this is a proper balance for the needs and goals of the company. OpenTable also uses Yelp and Google and other partners to cement its status as a default option for new restaurants, making their drive in digital media secure.

Price Strategy
The products of the company are mainly focused on the two services offered which are the OpenTable E.R.B., a computer terminal which essentially assists in running business in restaurants including seating arrangements, wait staff assignments, feedback from customers which could possibly lead to a more personalized experience for customers. Pricing of products include a one-time fee for installation and training costs which could range from $200 to $700 – depending on the company – and an additional monthly subscription fee also applies, ranging from a minimum of $199 per month with extra charges costing between $25 to $89, a month. Additionally, for each diner that completes his or her reservation, OpenTable receives a fee of $1 or $0.25 per diner depending if the reservations were made through OpenTable’s website or mobile app, as opposed to through the restaurant’s website using OpenTable’s software.
Open Table also has a lighter version of the reservation system called Connect, which deals mostly with restaurants that have, mostly, walk-in customers. In this system, OpenTable receives $2.50 per diner who completes his or her reservation through the OpenTable site, while a $0.25 fee applies for reservations made through the restaurant’s site using OpenTable software.
The strategy and strength of the business model that OpenTable adopts is that it is able to convert what was a fixed cost, for restaurants, into a variable one. This model is incredibly appealing to restaurateurs as many expenses in running a restaurant are non-variable as such utilities, rental and staffing. There are many competitive pressures which have resulted in renegotiations in relation to price. Depending on the type of adjustment in price, there could be a potential reduction in OpenTable’s future revenue.
In terms of competitor pricing, overseas options have proven to be more aggressive in terms of expanding and also, charging lesser fees, for example using in Europe and Eveve in Scotland. Nonetheless, despite these credible competitors providing slight concern, OpenTable’s clientele is significantly higher than competitors, at over 24,000 restaurants and counting. OpenTable has indeed aligned itself with its target market pricing as well as assessed, although not adequately, elasticity of demand, which will show the in the way it copes with international pressures and competition as well as its willingness to negotiate.
Place & Distribution
Although figures vary widely from product to product, roughly a fifth of the cost of a product goes on getting it to the customer, but this is not our problem. 'Place' is concerned with various methods of transporting and storing goods, and then making them available for the customer, but in our case, we can offer the product to everyone as it consists in an online service that, thanks to our software platform, we can easily distribute.
So, as the distribution of our product is cheap and easy, our strategy will be to reach as many people as possible trying to target the most popular restaurants so that we keep attracting new customers.

Recommendations * Strengthen and grow existing market by enhancing the current diners’ experience, extending the mobile offering to android users. * Expand on mobile platform to respond to growing number of mobile users and make the current interface more user friendly * Diversify activities by acquiring a mobile application in the food delivery industry to enter a new market * Pursue the international expansion in major metropolitan cities.
Strengthen and grow existing markets
Current Situation
As of now, you are only servicing ¼ of dinners that make restaurant reservations. Some of that is due to the fact that the website is not very user friendly or intuitive.
We recommend that you strengthen your positioning by personalizing the dining experience. This can take several form. One of them is using Big Data that is collect from users to make their next reservation more convenient, intuitive.
Example: If a dinner always seems to order the same dish at restaurants, develop a feature that suggests some restaurants that have the best reviews for the same dish.
Continuously improve the software in hand. The current website is still basic and requires multiple steps. Develop options for users to sign in with their Facebook accounts, where you can access their preference information.
Include all your users by developing an android application, this is to strengthen your existing customer base so they do not feel left out as opposed to iPhone users.
Expansion of mobile platform
Current Situation
Your mobile interface is basic and has some bugs that prevents the customer to enjoy a seamless.
We recommend that you develop your mobile platform and design. The mobile interface can be improved by fixing minor bugs and making the interface more intuitive.
Develop additional features that will make the dining experience more pleasant. For example: When available, given the option to dinners to choose if they would like to be seated by the windows.
Develop the option to buy “OpenTable” credits that can be redeemed at the restaurants for a larger value. Example: A $50 OpenTable credit will have a value of $55 to use at one restaurant.

Diversification (Blue Ocean)
Current Situation
As you currently operate solely in the dining industry while some related markets are showing signs of growth.
We suggest that you cease some growth opportunities that are happening in the food delivery space, this will broaden your portfolio by doing a strategic acquisition of the application Eat24 . This will add some new assets and new talent to your portfolio. Acquiring a company that i has significant expertise in the space will save time, resources to deploy and possible errors that you may face if you were to get in the space as OpenTable.
We encourage you to keep investing in research and development to find innovative solutions that will help accomplish your mission to cover all aspect of the dining experience in the best possible way.
Current Situation
You are present in the UK, Japan, Mexico, Spain and Germany
We recommend you pursue your international expansion in larger metropolitan cities that have a large part of their population that share a similar lifestyle of dinning out in Europe, Asia and South America.
Use two different strategies to enter those markets.
Option 1: Duplicate your current model by deploying a sales forces on the ground to sign up restaurants. Hire local advertising agencies to run advertising campaigns in global and metropolitan cities
Option 2: Consider acquisitions of similar startup in the market of interest as you had previously done with in the United Kingdom.
The next steps described in this report has for purpose to reconcile the mission of OpenTable and the actual perception of its customers and lay a path for growth. Moving forward we anticipate to see major improvements in the mobile offering of the company by using a customer centric approach to personalize the user experience. A pursuit of opportunities in international markets as well as one or several acquisition efforts in the food delivery space. We are confident that with this plan OpenTable will secure its monopoly and become a serious competitor to the current players in the food delivery category.

Bibliography * Investor FAQs. (n.d.). Retrieved October 28, 2014, from * Open Table Case Study Analysis. (n.d.). Retrieved October 28, 2014, from * Priceline books OpenTable for 2.6bn. (2014, June 14). Retrieved October 28, 2014, from * Wegener, J. (2009, February 3). OpenTable and Restaurant Marketing at Back of the Envelope | Jonathan Wegener's Technology/Marketing Blog. Retrieved October 28, 2014, from * Open Table Case Study Analysis. (n.d.). Retrieved October 28, 2014, from * Kooser, A. (2012, October 1). A wave of competition goes after OpenTable's Throne. Retrieved October 28, 2014, from * Pastore, M. (2010, October 22). Is OpenTable Worth it? Retrieved October 28, 2014, from * Anderson, A. (2011, January 2). Quora. Retrieved October 28, 2014, from * OpenTable (OPEN). (n.d.). Retrieved November 11, 2014, from * (n.d.). Retrieved November 11, 2014, from * * Quora. (n.d.). Retrieved November 11, 2014, from * OpenTable goes beyond reservations, opens private beta for new dining payments service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 11, 2014, from * How To Build Customer Profiles For Your Social Media and Content Strategy. (n.d.). Retrieved November 26, 2014, from * Incanto. (n.d.). Retrieved November 26, 2014, from * OpenTable Restaurant. (n.d.). Retrieved November 26, 2014, from * Pay with OpenTable. (n.d.). Retrieved November 26, 2014, from * (n.d.). Retrieved November 26, 2014, from * (n.d.). Retrieved November 26, 2014, from * OpenTable's Success Story - (n.d.). Retrieved November 26, 2014, from * Wegener, J. (2009, February 3). OpenTable and Restaurant Marketing. Retrieved November 26, 2014, from * (n.d.). Retrieved December 2, 2014, from * Open Table Case Study Analysis. (n.d.). Retrieved December 2, 2014, from * Randall, B. (2011, November 8). OpenTable: Trying Not to Screw Up Free Lunch. Retrieved December 2, 2014, from * Miller, E. (2011, October 26). OPENTABLE EXPLAINED: Here's How The Company Makes Money. Retrieved December 2, 2014, from

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Course Project

...Priceline, the Billion Dollar Travel Company Introduction Priceline is a company that is headquartered in Norwalk, CT and has an office in New York, NY also. There are over 400 employees helping Priceline continue to do business. Priceline was established in 1998 and inaugurated its first television commercial a year later in 1999. Priceline is an online entity that helps customers find favorable travel deals. Priceline collects commissions on user reservations. They use social media like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Google+ to advertise specials that may not be listed on (2014). Although Priceline uses social media, they make it known that they do not need certain sites. provides vacation packages, rental cars, airline tickets, cruises, and hotel rooms all over the world. They have recently added restaurant reservations to their list of specialties. There are thousands of destinations and hundreds of countries to choose to travel or visit when booking with Priceline. Priceline uses three ways for customers to book travel: lowest retail rate, express deals, and name your own price. These options give travelers a little flexibility so they are able to get what they actually want. Priceline can broaden their business by giving customers more option on mobile applications and the name your price option. Current Use of the Web According to Anderson (2008), " is an Internet-based corporation offering services......

Words: 2421 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Open Table

...head: OPEN TABLE E-Commerce for Small Business Bryan Nickum Prof. Richard Swersey December 7, 2013 Case Study: Open Table 1. Why will OpenTable competitors have a difficult time competing against OpenTable? Competitors will have a difficult time competing against OpenTable for a few different reasons. They are well established with having which is a popular web site for making restaurant reservations and they also operate, a leading restaurant site in the United Kingdom. In just 13 years, they now have around two-thirds of the nation’s reservation-taking restaurants as clients. It is also relatively easy for people seeking a reservation to make one with their easy to use web site, mobile web site and mobile app. With all this said, it is extremely difficult for competitors to compete. 2. What characteristics of the restaurant market make it difficult for a national reservation system to work? The restaurant industry was slow to leverage the power of the internet. This was because the market was slow and still is, with only about 30,000 small, independent restaurants or local restaurant-owning groups. 3. How did OpenTable change its marketing strategy to succeed? The company changed its hardware and software to make it more user-friendly and they organized and implemented a door-to-door sales approach to solicit subscriptions......

Words: 373 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Open Table Case Analysis

...INTRODUCTION Situation Synopsis OpenTable was launched by Chuck Templeton in 1999, as a restaurant reservation service provider. The company started to approach the best-known restaurants in each city first, in order to attract others to join. In addition to reservation service, OpenTable developed an integrated service, Electronic Reservations Book (ERB). OpenTable offerings to restaurant include training, customer support, mobile payments, security assistances as well as Guest Center. OpenTable had grown rapidly by 2008; however, its growth slowed significantly from 2008 to 2012. More seriously, after the long-time CEO Jeff Jordan stepped down, the stock price dropped by 67%. Nevertheless, there is one good news that the Priceline, a multiple booking services provider, announced that it would acquire OpenTable with a 46% premium over the market price. It is undoubted that OpenTable is standing at a crossroad. Company’s Current Strategy The core OpenTable business closely tracked the restaurant online booking system. It is using single business diversification strategy as its corporate-level strategy. In terms of business-level strategy, most of other offerings were refinements to complement the core business as a result of differentiation strategy on broad market. Problem Statement The differentiation strategy works out only when the OpenTable is able to produce differentiated features at competitive costs. Indeed,......

Words: 2178 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Priceline Group Financial Statement Analysis

...Final Accounting Paper: Priceline Group (PCLN) Company Background In 1997, the Priceline Group Inc. was formed as a Delaware LLC until it converted its status to a corporation during July 1998. The brand launched its’ flagship brand,, and later expanded its’ operations with the acquisition of four other independently managed and operated brands, Kayak,,, and OpenTable. The brand offers consumers reservations for airplane tickets, cruises, vacation packages, and rental cars. Accommodation services are offered to consumers through,, and the aforementioned brand. These services include: bed and breakfasts, hotels, hostels, apartments, vacation rentals and other properties. provides access to rental car reservations worldwide. On Kayak, consumers are able to compare airline ticket, hotel reservation and rental car reservation information on an easy to use online platform with hundreds of travel websites. The mostly recently acquired company, OpenTable, offers online restaurant reservations. The chief objective of the business is “to serve consumers, their travel service providers, and restaurant partners with worldwide leadership in online reservation services.” (Priceline 10K) Priceline Group’s business model concentrates on earning its gross profit through five income streams: commissions earned from facilitating reservations for rental cars, cruises,......

Words: 2610 - Pages: 11

Free Essay


...《信息技术和信息社会》案例分析 (共两个案例,请尽可能在案例背景下,进行批判性思维critical thinking,给你的你想法。你的逻辑、创意、所运用的课程中的知识点是我所看重的) 案例1. Zynga Wins with Business Intelligence 这是一家高速发展的游戏公司,但它并不是以逼真的图像,令人心悸的动作,或者史诗般的故事著称,也不为Playstation, Xbox, 或者Wii开发游戏。这家公司就是Zynga。如果你有Facebook的账户,很大可能你会很熟悉它所开发的游戏。Zynga爆炸式发展表明社会游戏的潜力以及社会化网络在提供关键数据理解公司客户的能力。 Mark Pincus和一群创业者在2007年创建了Zynga,如今这家公司已经成为社交网络游戏的领行者,它的游戏包括CityVille、Texas HoldEm Poker、FarmVille、Empires & Allies等。这四款游戏是Facebook上最为流行的应用。Zynga的游戏有将近3亿月活跃用户以及6千多万日活跃用户,他们每天就会产生3TB的数据。自创建以来,Zynga便将数据分析放在优先级位置上,以方便对其游戏的管理以及公司的商业决策。 这家公司极度依赖数据来提高用户保有,增加游戏玩家的相互协作。用Zynga的首席数据官的话来说,有用的数据必须是“可行动的” – 它必须使能够帮助Zynga对其游戏做出显著改进的信息。游戏数据的产生和储存只是这个战争的一般。Zynga还必须有俩个分析团队(数据分析、可视化)来处理数据,在数据的基础上给出商务改进建议。 促进社会化游戏的经济性有三个关键指标:流失率、口碑传播系数、每个用户所带来的收入。流失率是指游戏玩家的的流失率。社会化游戏的流失率很高,平均而言,每月可以高达50%。这意味着今天注册的用户在一个月后只有一半人会继续。传播系数是衡量现有游戏玩家能够吸引新客户的有效性,这是社会化网络平台的一个重要能力。具体来讲,如果在一个月内,有100个FarmVille的玩家能够带来5个新的玩家,那么传播系数为1.05。用户收益是一个游戏玩家在整个生命周期所能够产生的预期收益,它是在每个用户的月收益和流失率的基础上计算。例如,如果每个用户的月均收益为5美元,流失率为50%,那么他的预期收益为5元第一个月 + 2.5元第二个月 + 1.25元第二个月等等依次类推,总共为10美元。 第一波Facebook上的社会化游戏关注提高传播系数,他们通过游戏玩家在游戏时的墙张贴广告来提高传播系数。但这样的做法产生了太多的“墙垃圾链接”或者游戏相关的帖子,使得用户很难看到他朋友推荐推荐过来的墙贴。为此,Facebook以及其他社会化网络平台严令要求游戏公司减少他们的墙贴。 为此,Zynga转向了社交图谱分析(social graph analysis)。对于社会化游戏,社交图谱,或者说朋友之间的关系,和社交网络平台有一些不同。例如,Zynga的Mafia Wars游戏,玩家可能有两类朋友:一类是对这个游戏很积极,另一类是对该游戏相对消极,只是为了朋友而加入到这个游戏,很少玩这个游戏或者很快就离开了这个游戏。玩家和这两类朋友的互动方式也不一定一样,例如积极分子朋友圈中礼物和提供帮助更多些。指导玩家对不同朋友采用不同的沟通方式,提高了收益降低了流失率。类似Zynga的社会化游戏公司必须从各个方面提升玩家体验才能提高游戏的利润。 来自于Vertica......

Words: 1480 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Buyer Personas

...mailers are expensive and don’t guarantee any measurable ROI. E-mail marketing is better, cheaper, and definitely has its place. However, only a few percent of e-mails are ever opened, and many of my customers do not want to give out their e-mail addresses for fear of more SPAM. 2. My inability to quote accurate wait times for walk-in and call-ahead parties, while simultaneously ensuring that reservations are seated at the time they requested, during peak hours negatively impacts my customers’ satisfaction. 3. Taking reservations by phone with pen & paper by phone is inefficient, requires that someone is available at all hours of the day (even when we’re closed), and is prone to human error. Using reservations services such as OpenTable is extremely costly and they take control of my restaurant’s brand – charging me for reservations even if made on my own website, listing me on their site adjacent to my competition and even using my customer information in e-mails promoting other local restaurants. 4. Viewing and changing the status of tables and making sure that servers don’t get slammed...

Words: 1585 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Kommunikation Und Verhandlung

...UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES MAINZ HAUSARBEIT KOMMUNIKATION UND VERHANDLUNG Die Neukunden-Kaltakquise für das Unternehmen Tablespots Tsai-Lim Jonathan Chung (Matrikel Nr. 906752) 15.11.2011 STUDIENGANG : Master of Sciences Business Administration FACHBEREICH : Wirtschaft MODUL DOZENT : Kommunikation und Verhandlung : Prof. Dr. Siegfried Preiser KOMMUNIKATION UND VERHANDLUNG Tsai-Lim Jonathan Chung (Matrikel Nr. 906752) Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 2 Tablespots: Die effiziente und flexible Online-Reservierung .......................................................... 2 Grundmodelle der Kommunikation ................................................................................................ 3 2.1 2.2 3 Sender-Empfänger-Modell ...................................................................................................... 3 Eisberg-Modell ........................................................................................................................ 4 Neukundenakquise .......................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 3.2 Kaltakquise per Telefon ........................................................................................................... 5 Das persönliche Verkaufsgespräch.......................................................................................... 5 Bedarfsanalyse ....................................................................................

Words: 3534 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

Personal Statement for Grad School

...My future career in pharmacy was well thought-out before college until the very moment I was questioned about how I felt about my life. I was assisting a patient in the pharmacy and she merely asked me, “How’s life?” My response of simply being content prompted an unexpected response from not only her but myself as well. She responded, shocked, that I couldn’t have used a better depiction and how satisfying it was to hear that I was content. Her stunned reaction made me question not just about how rare it was for others to provide a similar response but ultimately, whether or not I meant what I had said. Was I really content? That was when it truly hit me, I was not satisfied with my life. I did not want to become a pharmacist. For me, it was something that lacked exhilaration, something that I just had absolute no desire for. All because of this patient's comment, I made the drastic change to drop pharmacy and switch career paths. I no longer wanted to make the same mistake and choose something I did not enjoy, like pharmacy. I wanted to explore something I have always been passionate about, which is numbers! While I found out the hard way about what I wanted to pursue in life, it was better for me to derive to this decision sooner than later. Later that year, I decided to get my feet wet by first taking an introduction to accounting course. It was so minimal and to explore even more, I took the subsequent course as well. After taking those courses, it utterly reinforced my...

Words: 607 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Leye Study

...LEYE Strategy As the slides point out there is a massive difference between the Boomer generation and generation X & Y. To accommodate the newer generations LEYE will need to develop a technological presence, in the form of social media and online access. The fist goal is to establish a website. This site at minimum offers the customer basic information, locations, hours of operations etc. For advanced attributes, like loyalty information should also be made available in support capacity. The social media roll out would follow the website. LEYE should look to Facebook and Twitter, and partner with OpenTable. The venue that is being utilized should be considered when sending out coupons, deals etc. Facebook ads should be limited to only those that LEYE believes will attract the most people deal, i.e. the best deals. Facebook users will tend to skim over post by companies that appear frequently. If a user sees too many Facebook post there is a high probability that the user will either ignore the post or un-friend them because of they find it annoying. Twitter on the other hand is the Wild Wild West of social media. Although it is not as popular as Facebook, it’s users are more susceptible to rapid fire short post from those they follow. In both cases LEYE should assemble a social media assessment and review team. This team is charged with reviewing any post or tweets regarding LEYE, and take corrective actions if need be. Brand Management Brand Management, in......

Words: 540 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Cloud Computing

...LD CCloud computing refers to the provision of computational resources on demand via a network. Cloud computing can be compared to the supply of electricity and gas, or the provision of telephone, television and postal services. All of these services are presented to the users in a simple way that is easy to understand without the users needing to know how the services are provided. This simplified view is called an abstraction. Similarly, cloud computing offers computer application developers and users an abstract view of services that simplifies and ignores much of the details and inner workings. A provider's offering of abstracted Internet services is often called The Cloud. The key characteristic of cloud computing is that the computing is "in the cloud" i.e. the processing (and the related data) is not in a specified, known or static place(s). This is in contrast to a model in which the processing takes place in one or more specific servers that are known. All the other concepts mentioned are supplementary or complementary to this concept. Example: Microsoft Windows Azure The Windows Azure platform is a flexible cloud–computing platform that lets you focus on solving business problems and addressing customer needs. No need to invest upfront on expensive infrastructure. Pay only for what you use, scale up when you need capacity and pull it back when you don’t. We handle all the patches and maintenance — all in a secure environment with over 99.9% uptime. ...

Words: 1104 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...[pic] Mobile App Proposal - Company Name - May 21, 14 Direct Contact 1-800-555-5555 Email Table Of Contents 01. Client Name 02. Introduction 03. Project Overview & Objectives 04. Mobile Website / Mobile Applications Development Strategies 05. Analytics 06. Secure Hosting 07. Maintenance 08. Client Responsibilities 09. Monthly Fees 10. White Label Contracts 11. Billing Schedule 12. Terms and Conditions (YOUR COMPANY) is pleased to submit a proposal for the development of a mobile app to (CLIENT NAME). The terms of this proposal are valid for up to sixty days after being presented. Client Name Project Name: (YOUR COMPANY) will design and develop a custom mobile friendly website for (CLIENT DOMAIN). The mobile friendly website will be designed to ultimately drive customer retention and overall sales for (CLIENT NAME). Introduction DEAR (CLIENT), We welcome the opportunity to build a cutting-edge mobile website and deploy to market a mobile app for (CLIENT NAME) that will increase sales and customer retention. (YOUR COMPANY) is a mobile marketing agency focused on providing cost-effective mobile marketing tools. From iPhone applications to iPad applications to HTML5 applications (YOUR COMPANY) delivers mobile apps and mobile websites on every platform. (YOUR COMPANY) will put you in front of your customers on devices they access most with information and tools that make it easy for......

Words: 1366 - Pages: 6

Free Essay


...Case Studies Solutions Case Studies Solutions,Article Writing,Assignments,Research Work,Home Work MenuSkip to content Home How We Work ? Refund Policy How to Order ? Disclaimer Contact Us Finance Cases List POSTED ON MARCH 8, 2013 Hello, If u want us to solve any case study from below list, do contact us anytime, We are here to provide the experience, expertise, and professionalism that you are looking for , Our tutors are available 24/7 to assist you what you need, Click Here to submit your Order. ======================================================================================= Acquisition of Consolidated Rail Corp. by Benjamin C. Esty Airbus A3XX: Developing the World’s Largest Commercial Jet by Benjamin C. Esty American Chemical William E. Fruhan, John P. Goldsberry American Home Products David W. Mullins AQR’s Momentum Funds by Daniel B. Bergstresser, Lauren H. Cohen, Randolph B. Cohen, Christopher Malloy Arundel Partners: The Sequel Project by Timothy A. Luehrman AXA MONY by Andre F. Perold, Lucy White Beta Management Co. by Michael E. Edleson Butler Lumber Co. by Thomas R. Piper Cartwright Lumber Thomas R. Piper Citigroup 2007: Financial Reporting and Regulatory Capital by Edward J. Riedl, Suraj Srinivasan Clarkson Lumber Co. by Thomas R. Piper Cooper Industries, Inc. by Thomas R. Piper Cost of Capital at Ameritrade by Erik Stafford, Mark L. Mitchell Debt Policy at UST, Inc. by Mark L. Mitchell Dell’s Working......

Words: 3635 - Pages: 15

Free Essay


...Zappos Katrina E. Johnson MGT 4800 Thursday May 10th 2012 Linda Mohr Abstract is an online clothing and shoe store. Zippos’ was founded in 1999 and has grown to be the largest worldwide. The CEO Tony Hseih’ leadership has brought Zippos to a level of rapid growth in less than 10 years. He is innovative with his use of relationship marketing. Hseih believes strongly in diversity, ethics, character, and personality within the workplace. Hseih has a clear understand of the use of technology, social networking, and its value within the market place. Tony Hseih use of growing strategy is pivotal in his success. Zappos The original founder of Zippos is Nick Swinmurn. Swinmurn was out shopping one day in the San Francisco area and could not find what he needed. The very same day Swinmurn went to his small home and has an idea for an online shoe retailer. In 1999, the dotcom boom was on the up rise and Swinmurn site was one of the hundred upstarts. Although, most of the dotcom boom went broke, Zappos was experiencing and exponential rise to success. In 2008 Zappos reached $1billion in annual sales and made, it to the coveted listed of the Fortune Magazine’s list of best companies to work for and that same year reached its 10th anniversary. In December 1999, Swinmurn and a few of his partners realized they had used up their investors seed money and were nowhere near close to realizing a profit. One evening the group met at a bar for drinks to......

Words: 1893 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Linkedin Corporation Ipo

...I. Assumptions underlying the market valuation End of July 7, 2011 LinkedIn price closed at $94, more than double its IPO of $45. It all started on 19 May 2011, when most od media published the headline like ‘LinkedIn stock more than doubles in IPO’. On this very day Jeffrey Weiner, LinkedIn’s CEO, answer to the question of Bloomberg ‘Do you think you left some money on the table Jeff with a price of $45?’ Answer ‘We are in for the long-term’. What does this mean exactly? The market was still finding the real price, as we can see on page 11 Exhibit 1 the price then dropped, around 21 of June 2011 the price rises again. Before hitting the key assumptions, it is good to also have a look at the Exhibit 2 on page 12. LinkedIn has been making net losses before 2010, with an exception in 2007. 2010 was an exceptional year with high growth rate, the market was changing. Early 2011 it had over 100 members over 200 countries and was growing at 1mil new members every 10 days. This was just the right time for the IPO. The key assumptions underlying the market price of July 7, 2011: a) The market assumed that LinkedIn would growth, at higher rate than 2010. Growth in all aspects, number of members and revenue. In fact since $94 was greater than the value in Exhibit 17 by JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley, this implies that the market expected a higher terminal growth rate of 6% (assuming market had the same assumption about cost of capital). Terminal growth rate meant the company......

Words: 1698 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...------------------------------------------------- Breakeven Analysis of Zomato Submitted to: Submitted by: Prof. Atmanand Jyoti (15PGHR03) Lovish (15PGHR23) Vikas (15PGHR50) Rohit (15PGHR52) Zachariah (15PGHR53) Sophiya (15PGHR58) Acknowledgement We wish to express our sincere thanks and gratitude to Prof. Atmanand for providing us an opportunity to undertake this project under his guidance. The completion of this project would not have been possible without his timely advice and dedicated support. The guidance provided by him is immensely valuable. We are very thankful to him for his prompt inspiration, suggestions and patience while helping us. Table Of Content * About the Company * Funding * Revenue......

Words: 3232 - Pages: 13