Free Essay

Organizational Change

In: Business and Management

Submitted By feher1
Words 2480
Pages 10
Organizational Change
Name:
Institution:
Instructor:
Course:
Date:

Abstract
The report looks at the process of change in organizations. It examines the stakeholders and how a change which in this case is downsizing would affect them. The paper also looks at how downsizing affects people with interests in a company, that is to say the stake holders who are adversely affected. The reasons why change in most cases results in these effects is examined. Then the report also looks at the methodology that could be used in the implementing changes in the organization in a managerial level so as to minimize the re-occurrence of the effects that are not good to the business and those with vested interests.
Introduction
There are many ways in which a business can be affected by change. Some examples of changes that are made in the organization include downsizing; changes made in the structure of the organization, and at times even change in processes carried out in the organization. All these changes are usually necessary to enable the organization or business adapt to some of the changes in its operating environment (Kreitner, 2008).
All these can be summarized using one word, ‘restructuring’. It could also be referred to as re-engineering. In order to be successful in today’s competitive world, an organization has to embrace this important aspect in its day to day operations. This change can be for the whole company, or can only involve certain parts of company. Restructuring involves changes in the strategy of the company, the procedures it uses and even the structures or facilities used in achieving particular goals or objectives.
Change in the ownership of a company can come about in different ways. Some of this ways include the divesture and acquisition to another company, or the later which implies that another company coming to be part of the organization. The leadership of the company should be interfered with in some ways. Mostly it is through a reduction in the number of positions between the lower cadre workers and the managers (Kuriger, 2004). All or some aspects of the organization’s culture have to be streamlined in accordance with the new way of doing things in the organization.
For the purpose of success, change process has to touch on all the pillars of the business of a company, or at least those that remain untouched should be in-line with the company’s new ways of undertaking its operations (Lewis, 2011). Some of the basic areas of the business that could be affected by the change process includes, the finances of the company, the assets that it posses, whatever services or products it produces, the way in which it carries out the selling and buying of goods and services, area of business that is considered to be its core, and finally the number and type of employees it has. At one time I was the strategy manager and adviser for a medium sized enterprise in Virginia. The business was all about making cardboard boxes used in storage and transportation services. There was a plant whereby the different/varieties boxes were made before storing them for distribution to different companies and even to domestic users. The company employed a substantial number of people in the small town from which it operated. Majority of these however were from the production and sales department.
Now we as the management, it came to our realization that our company was running out of the competitive edge in market to the competitors because of its large number of employees. Thus as the management, we came up with the strategy aimed at reducing the number of staff members. We examined all the other options including early retirement and leaving on a voluntary basis but still the labor costs were too high. So we settled on this. The laying off of workers required quite a number of things which was to be done with many considerations in mind (Dawson, 2003). Some other measures were also necessary in order to ensure that it is successful and effectiveness for the purpose intended.
To begin with, we had to do a lot of sensitization so to ensure that members of the society around our company did not perceive our intentions negatively. This also had to be done to those employees who were to remain to ensure that their level of productivity did not drop and affect the performance of the company as a result of our actions.
The human resource department was tasked with the responsibility of determining the right wages for every one of those who were to leave the company. They were also asked to determine which positions that was not essential to the organization for consideration in this cost reduction exercise. Even as we carried out all these procedures, we ensured that the employees are made aware of the criteria and the process that we used in carrying the exercise. In this way we were able to minimize accusations from employees of favoritism (Huber, 1995).
As we went about with this cost reduction measures in the company, I noticed a number of things on those that I considered as the stakeholders in the company. The employees who remained in the company for instance, appeared to have some amounts of uncertainty on whether the company was going to close down for good. This impacted negatively on the company, since each month the number of employees who left their positions voluntarily went up so much in comparison to the period before the downsizing. This was not very good for company since the cost of employing new people to replace them impacted negatively on the strategy of reducing costs which had led to downsizing in the first place (Lewis, 2011).
There was also another issue, the top management that was involved in this whole decision, had this feeling of guilt especially when asked now and again why we had laid off some, even though it was the only left option for us to use in changing the company. There was also a substantial amount of money that was used in paying off those who had been retrenched; it took the company some time to get back to their profitability level once again after the exercise had been carried out.
The morale in the company was also low after the downsizing had been done as those considered having the best performers left the company with the perception that the company could be experiencing financial problems. The cost reduction exercise brought about by the laying of some of the workers interfered with some of the clients who received fewer visits from sales people as compared to before; this meant that some of them could not get the supplies they needed in good time because of this (Mills, 2003).
From the experiences that I had while at this cardboard box manufacturing company, I have come to appreciate how tough it is bringing change to a company and keeping the negative effects to the minimum. Neither is choosing the change to be implemented easier. All these are made more difficult, by the scale in which they are to be undertaken in the organization. Organizational Changes that are done on a larger scale for example for the entire organization; for example the retrenchment that was done in this company is much more difficult to control and minimize. There are chances of coming out with some undesirable effects (Mills, 2003).
There are a number of reasons why it may not be straight forward to bring about a change in an organization such as downsizing, and yet not encounter an array of problems. Among the reasons is that initiating a change in a business or an organization is akin to making an individual change his or her lifestyle. It is usually not that easy. There other reason is that people are bound to try and disassociate with what they are not used to, which in this case refers to change.
Another aspect is that change causes an amount of unsurity in the way the company may behave in the future of which most people are not comfortable with. There is usually some level of doubt by many people until they are able to see for themselves the end result of whatever action was done (Kreitner, 2008). However it is important to continue with the implementation of the planned change, for example in this case downsizing until the good side of it becomes visible.
To achieve all this, it is very important that a number of things are not only taken note of, but also implemented. These are a particular way of doing it or process implementation, and the other is a group of people that is to be tasked with the duty of bringing about this change, in the case of the card board company downsizing. This group of individuals that is to be mandated with this responsibility does not have to be dwelling on the subject all their time.
However, the team has to be empowered in bringing about the change that it has been tasked to do. The individuals in the team have to be representative of the areas in which this change is to impact greatly in the company. The amount of work that the individuals in the team need to put in the change initiative has to correspond with the task at hand. For example a very huge change in the company could require the equivalent of a month’s work dedicated to this issue. At times it may be beneficial to include an external consultant; in this way some of the adverse effects especially in new areas of engagement such as downsizing could be greatly reduced (Kreitner, 2008).
Apart from the formation of a team, it is also important that a systematic approach is used. This systematic way of carrying out change in the organization, has got to be in line with the company’s vision. In the case of the cardboard box manufacturing company that I worked for, the vision was to be the leader in the manufacture of card board boxes in Virginia. This vision was being hampered by a bloated staff that was increasing costs and thus reducing competitiveness of the business. Then it is important for a company to know the type of people that they target in the market of their goods or services as it goes on implementing change (Lewis, 2011). What is the best methodology of implementing change in an organization, so as to keep problems associated with this change to the minimum? This entails first of all establishing whether it is necessary for the change to be carried out for the benefit of the organization. In our case the need for downsizing was really crucial for the company to cut down costs. Then there would be the determination of how much of the change is to be done in order to achieve the desired results (Lewis, 2011). For the downsizing case at the card board making company, an estimated number type of employees as well as the type of employees who would require retrenchment would be necessary. The next stage would be envisioning what the change would result in, and how soon it could be undertaken.
The fourth step in the carrying out of change using this methodology pointing out all that has to be done in order for the change that is planned to be considered successful. It is important that conflicts are avoided in this stage as among the processes that are identified critical for this function (Harigopal, 2006). It is also essential to involve some key people in the change process by telling them what they should do in the implementation of the change process.
The leadership in the organization needs to find out these processes and emphasis their importance to the team that is charged with implementing the project (Harigopal, 2006). It is important that the structure of the organization is made to enhance the ability of the changes that are being implemented to achieve their goals.
Anything that appears to be a hindrance related to the organizational structure need to be removed (Harigopal, 2006). In the cardboard box factory, amongst the mistakes that we made were in the area of creating an organizational structure that would enable a reduction in costs which had been the main aim. This however did not happen, since the downsizing concentrated so much on the lower cadre workers, what seemed to go unseen was that some of the senior executives were not all that necessary, yet they were also contributing to the high labor costs.
There is also the need for an organization to establish what it considers to be its own measures of performance as it seeks some changes within itself. An organization however doesn’t have to make this be in terms of its finances as many others do, this only indicates the previous achievement (Harigopal, 2006). What has to be done is the development of important indicators within the organization that can show the performance of the change that it has undertaken to implement. It is important that some tools are used in the assessment of the change that is being implemented. For example, tools that relate to enterprise resource planning especially the software are important when implementing change, the reason being that they initiate a sense of discipline in the implementation process of change.
To wind up the methodology on effective and efficient implementation of organizational change, it is crucial to mention that training of people on how to effect the change and also how it will affect them is important. Finally, it is appropriate that the individuals who take part actively in effecting the change are assured of business rewards. This can be either in money form or in kind (Harigopal, 2006).

Conclusion
In an organization, there is usually the established way of doing things. Changing this and bringing about a difference in the business, and be able to achieve positive results, means carrying out this change in a structured way, that minimizes negative effects to the stakeholders of the organization. This is the duty of the business leaders that does not affect the organization and its stakeholders adversely.

References
Dawson, P. (2003). Understanding organizational change: the contemporary experience of people at work. London: SAGE.
George P. Huber, W. H. (1995). Organizational change and redesign: ideas and insights for improving performance, Issue 1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harigopal, K. (2006). Management of organizational change: leveraging transformation. London: SAGE.
Kreitner, A. K. (2008). Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Kuriger, C. C. (2004). Organizational Change: Case Studies in the Real World. New York: Universal-Publishers.
Lewis, L. K. (2011). Organizational Change: Creating Change Through Strategic Communication. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mills, J. H. (2003). Making sense of organizational change. London: Routledge.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...Organizational change Organizational change is often a vital part in a company’s organizational development. For an organization to succeed within the competitive and often unpredictable business world it is crucial that the organization is able to adapt to, and embrace change. There are a number of forces both internal, for example; organizational growth, restructuring, redesign of jobs, and external; technological advances, customer needs and competitor behavior, which can be the driving force for change. It is often the case however, that employees will react adversely to change, and perhaps this is because employees and senior executives view change differently. Company executives view change as a good thing, an opportunity to better the company and often to better themselves and their career, where as often employees will perceive change as disruptive and intrusive. It is fundamental to the success of the organization that the need for change and any change made to the organization is understood and supported by the organizations employees throughout the hierarchy. If an organization cannot embrace change then it is likely that this will have a detrimental effect on the business. This point can be illustrated by the Netherlands firm Philips Electronics. In the 1980’s, employees at the firms failure to understand and adapt to change drove organization to the brink of bankruptcy. The concept of resistance to change can be traced back to social......

Words: 307 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...Organizational Change Plan -Part 1 Kristine Vyers HCS/587 August 20, 2013 Organizational Change Plan -Part 1 Abstract Rapidly changing patient care environments result in significant ramifications for nursing team members caring for patients. These recent changes have refocused the current workflow views back onto inter-disciplinary teams, and collaborative working environments, and lead to a reexamination of nursing roles in the Long-Term Acute Care (LTAC) arena. Using action research methodology allows for the identification of areas of change, clarification of core and specialty skills, which in turn assist in the redefinition of nursing roles and eventually the adaption of a new nursing model. The new nursing model requires ongoing, detailed, and process driven education to establish and clarify the change objectives and new nursing roles. Quantitative and qualitative data collected from numerous sources, in conjunction with unit-based round tables, individual patients, nurse managers, and administrative interviews allows for consideration of multiple stakeholders. When patients vocalize a positive experience with services provided, this information helps to shape the new roles and responsibilities for the nursing teams. Proposed Change After the second California Medicare Services survey in 2013 major nursing deficiencies were highlighted between K Hospital’s patient acuities and the current staffing mix. In response to these specific......

Words: 1433 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...customization of the material. Pfeiffer also recognizes the remarkable power of new technologies in expanding the reach and effectiveness of training. While e-hype has often created whizbang solutions in search of a problem, we are dedicated to bringing convenience and enhancements to proven training solutions. All our e-tools comply with rigorous functionality standards. The most appropriate technology wrapped around essential content yields the perfect solution for today’s on-the-go trainers and human resource professionals. w w w. p f e i f f e r. c o m Essential resources for training and HR professionals S Best Practices in Leadership Development and Organization Change S S S Best Practices in Leadership Development and Organization Change How the Best Companies Ensure Meaningful Change and Sustainable Leadership Louis Carter David Ulrich Marshall Goldsmith Editors Copyright © 2005 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published by Pfeiffer An Imprint of Wiley 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741 www.pfeiffer.com No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance......

Words: 29274 - Pages: 118

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...Organizational Change Rodney Hickson BUS610: Organizational Behavior Dr. Brand Bowler February 18, 2013 Change is essential to the longevity of all organizations. Without change a organizations faces the possibly of making their impact in their market place obsolete. But change inside an organization can often cause employees and management to be resistant to change. In many case this can be the result of internal and external factors which can be simplified down to personal and professional fears of how a change many affect their individual roles and responsibilities in an organization. Employees resist change for reasons of self-interest when they realize that levels of power, money, prestige, job security, and personal convenience are at stake. The sunk costs doctrine suggests that over time a person's investment in a company escalates—as pension funds accumulate and the person's allowed vacation time rises, along with their chances of being promoted or enjoying the benefits of seniority. These investments may in turn drive resistance to change as the employee seeks to maintain the status quo (Patti, 1974). Resistance can also be based on simply not understanding why a change has become necessary, such as when an employee who does not use social media does not understand why a Facebook page would be a good idea for a company. At times employees do not trust management's motives, in essence thinking or asking, "What are they really up to when they asked for this...

Words: 1120 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...Organizational Change If you are a business leader today there is one thing that constantly runs through your mind, “How can we continue to succeed and grow.” In today’s society it has become harder and harder to accomplish such a task. The world is ever changing and it does so in a pace that is far more rapid than that of 20 years ago. Business leaders know that change is inevitable, but where the problem lies is how to manage the change in a way that will allow for continued growth and success, but at the same time they want to be able to do so with as little stress as possible to the employees. There are hundreds of ways to make changes in an organization, and plenty of people out there pitching their ideas as the best. It is up to the business leaders to find a technique that will best suite their needs as an organization, a technique that will give them the results they are looking for, this is the case with General Motors. General Motors is made up of four different auto makers (Buick, GM, Pontiac and Chevrolet) and each one runs independently from the others. GM decided that having four independently ran divisions, which competed against one another was more costly than beneficial and they searched to find a way to change this for the better. ...

Words: 1858 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...Organizational Change Plan 09/08/2014 Marnelle Paul HCS 587 Professor: Virginia Weatherston Many health care organizations in New York, including Long Island are moving toward the continued growth of improved documentations and communication. It is a big change of moving from paper-based nursing documentation to Electronic Medical Record (EMR) as required by the department of Health law that documentation of nursing intervention be done appropriately, and the care given be evaluated accordingly to improve the quality of care that nurses are rendered. This proposed change that is selected is designed for a long term care facility in Syosset, Long Island, with the vision to maintain excellence in care. The need in this health care facility for the change will be examined as well as the organizational and individual barriers to the change. Even though there are factors that might influence the change, there are also factors that will influence the organizational readiness for the change. The success of the changed will depend on the right theoretical model approach, and the right availability of internal and external resources. This new change will allow other providers to have access to the medical records without having to fax or mail them which may delay care. When a patient requires more intensive care such as cardiac distress that requires a transfer to a more skilled facility, the EMS transporter must wait for all the paper work to be done,......

Words: 1286 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...Journal of Change Management Vol. 5, No. 4, 369 –380, December 2005 Organisational Change Management: A Critical Review RUNE TODNEM BY Queen Margaret University College, Edinburgh, UK ABSTRACT It can be argued that the successful management of change is crucial to any organisation in order to survive and succeed in the present highly competitive and continuously evolving business environment. However, theories and approaches to change management currently available to academics and practitioners are often contradictory, mostly lacking empirical evidence and supported by unchallenged hypotheses concerning the nature of contemporary organisational change management. The purpose of this article is, therefore, to provide a critical review of some of the main theories and approaches to organisational change management as an important first step towards constructing a new framework for managing change. The article concludes with recommendations for further research. KEY WORDS : Critical review; theories and approaches Introduction Change management has been defined as ‘the process of continually renewing an organization’s direction, structure, and capabilities to serve the ever-changing needs of external and internal customers’ (Moran and Brightman, 2001: 111). According to Burnes (2004) change is an ever-present feature of organisational life, both at an operational and strategic level. Therefore, there should be no doubt regarding the importance to any organisation of...

Words: 5198 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...AP Stucco, Inc. Organizational Change Proposal Kayla Oliver-Pratt BUS 610 Inst. Peggy Morrison July 5, 2011 Organizational Change Organizational change is inevitable. For centuries philosophers have struggled with the meaning of “change.” Accomplishing organizational change is one of the greatest challenges for business leaders in the twenty-first century. In order to build a successful organization, it takes time, effort, and perseverance; but once success is obtained, maintaining that success becomes a motivating force. To effectively change and improve performance, management must initiate activities to help change weaknesses into strengths. According to Kinicki & Kreitner, (2009), “Successful organizational change requires management commitment, an implementation plan, and buy-in from all employees (p 411). In this paper I will describe an organizational change management approach for a new structure and the need for growth in a small contracting construction company. I will also focus on the recommended steps need for minimizing adverse impact, the systemic nature of the organization, and how the change will improve the effectiveness of the organization, its processes and the productivity of its employees. A need for growth is necessary for any organization in order to remain a viable entity. Just as anything in life has the tendency to change, so can cultures and markets, with requires constant attention and preparation. In order to be successful...

Words: 1831 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...Massive Changes in Organizational Practice Significant inter-organizational changes have been witnessing enriched hierarchal changes using horizontal networks through restructuring. Within the article Miller and Rice describe boundaries as a system implying discontinuity, with a combination of territory, time and technology (Yan & Meryl, 1999). In 1978 Pfeffer and Salancik applied the idea that a power criterion could inform on the determination of activities that were a shared or joint control. The last suggestion made in the article leads to the premises that boundaries are the connections and interdependencies within a system (Yan & Meryl, 1999). Boundaries defined A boundary as a demarcation distinguishes social entities from one another; for example, between two organizations. A boundary as a perimeter allows for and defines focal point systems that embody disturbances. It means that at some instances the organization is closed yet others are open and this is a means for disruption and turbulence. A boundary as an interface is a perspective that focuses on inter-dependent relationships and cross-bound transactions between systems to act as a common meeting place to pay special attention to issues, conflicts and provides and allows for a flow of communication. Boundary as a frontier is where the environment is treated as the origin for resources in which the system is depended. (Yan & Meryl, 1999). Boundaries and the work unit The article explains that......

Words: 562 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...Institutional affiliation Types of health care organizational structure Holarctic structure: it is a form of governance in which authority and decision-making are distributed throughout a group of the self-organizing team rather than a management hierarchy. Traditional hierarchy/ vertical organizational structure: it is a type of governance where power flows vertically upwards. Employees follow a chain of command. The head of the organization gives the final decision. Flat/horizontal organization: it has few or no level of middle management. Well-trained workers are more productive when it comes to decision making other than close supervision by many layers of the organization. Importance of strategic model Developing strategic management models helps in defining various roles of departmental teams assist in driving the organization forward. It also helps the organization keep track of its mission, vision, and values. The model also helps in ensuring maximum use of the organization resources towards its development and growth. Depending on the structure of governance an organization takes, it always aims to accomplish its mandate(Crowell, 2011). Achieving change There are eight basic steps to achieve change in an organization First define stakeholder and organization needs: support and engage people in the team on the importance of change. Address their motivation, both emotional and practical needs, and their readiness to change. This would help in crafting......

Words: 1368 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Organizational Change

...Recognizing the importance of issues, Microchip implemented change in the workplace, rebuilt, and created a supportive culture. Lyle and other supervisors spent more time on the floor with employees to observe, analyze, and collaborate on the present and upcoming issues. Also, they used informal and formal feedback as well as gave workers opportunties to express their concerns. Moreover, Lyle evaluated teamwork and team standards in the workplaces to help people reconnect and create accountability for the treams. In addition, cross training was implemented to create more flexibility and opportunity for the workforce. Every week, leaders gathered together for ideas about a new set of values for each area. In conclusion, Microchip implemented this type of organizational to improve and create a high efficienent workforce and production line. An analysis completed on Microchips concludes with various suggestions for the company. The first suggestion is for leadership to recognize the workforce. As discussed above, there is a disconnect between leadership and the workforce. A few suggestions for Microchip to implement are to recognize the workforce by saying “thank you for your hard work,” hosting weekly and monthly meetings for the workforce to be able to express their concerns to a transparent and open floor discussion with leadership, as well as host a casual luncheon to award the monthly employee of the month. The implementation of this suggest will provide the workforce......

Words: 433 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...Organizational Change: Management Versus Leadership Jeffrey Gomez Management versus Leadership Management makes complicated process runs smoothly. It is described as predictable, orderly and may produce short-term results (Kotter, 1996). Leadership creates the organization and adapts to changes as it occurs. It is described as producer of a very useful change in the organization (Kotter, 1996). Leaders and managers are being compared through the following comparisons. Leaders are focused on people, inspire trust, develop, do the right thing and they innovate (Brinegar, 2014). Managers focus on systems, rely on control, maintain, do things right, and they administer (Brinegar, 2014). Organizational Change Change is a response to pressures and internal or external forces that cause an organization to modify. It could be planned or unplanned response to forces such as technology, environment, politics or even competition (Todd D. Jick, 2010). The approach to change depends on the complexity or simplicity of the matter and the unpredictability or the unclear solutions as response to pressures (Joe, 2009) According to Linda Ackerman, there are three types of changes and each varies scope and depth. The following are Developmental, Transitional, and Transformational (Todd D. Jick, 2010). Developmental Changed Developmental change is often used to improve business procedures. There are no radical changes in the organization’s structure but to develop processes...

Words: 1027 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...A Process for Changing Organizational Culture Kim Cameron University of Michigan Business School 701 Tappan Street Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 734-615-5247 kim_cameron@umich.edu To be published in Michael Driver (Ed.) The Handbook of Organizational Development 2004 2 A Process for Changing Organizational Culture Kim Cameron University of Michigan Much of the current scholarly literature argues that successful companies--those with sustained profitability and above-normal financial returns--are characterized by certain well-defined external conditions. These conditions include having (1) high barriers to entry (e.g., the difficulty of other firms entering the market, so few, if any, competitors exist), (2) nonsubstitutable products (e.g., others cannot duplicate the firm’s product, and no alternatives exist), (3) a large market share (e.g., the firm can capitalize of economies of scale and efficiencies by dominating the market), (4) buyers with low bargaining power (e.g., purchasers of the firm’s products become dependent on the firm because they have no other alternative sources) (5) suppliers with low bargaining power (e.g., suppliers to the firm become dependent because they have no other alternative customers), (6) rivalry among competitors (e.g., incentives to improve are a product of rigorous competition), and (7) rare products or services (e.g., offering something that no other company provides) (Porter, 1980; Barney, 1995). Unquestionably, these are......

Words: 7375 - Pages: 30

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...living in a fast pace society and it is essential to allow change to keep up. Due to globalization our markets are fuller with endless opportunities to raise revenue which will lead to growth. Our markets have become so diverse with a variety of needs that one must understand that there are certain expectations that must be met in order to satisfy consumers which can only be met with collaboration. It is critical for management and leaders to be able to manage organizational change because the purpose for this change is to improve the organization’s effectiveness and the people within that organization. Organizational change is sometimes provoked by external forces, such as increase in production, funding cuts, new clients or markets. This process occurs as often as a person will grow through lifecycles. It generally does not include modification to a program, or adding employees but when a company goes through an “organizational transformation” to achieve an overall goal, they will change their strategy or shift the way the company is run, mergers, re-engineering, reconstructing, new technologies, maybe by removing some aspect, or resizing. Possibly some form of freezing or un-freezing, even change in policies or procedures. A significant change can be adding something new, advertisement or even a new chief executive officer with his or her wishes on how the company should be run, could also lead to substantial change in the organization. There are managers and leaders......

Words: 1451 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Organizational Change

...Implementing Change in Organizations (Shift Happens) Research Paper MGT6681 Abstract As one of the key lessons in the book Who Moved My Cheese? points out, “change happens”; in fact, change may be the only constant in our lives. Some people thrive on change; others will avoid it at all costs – even if it costs them their livelihood. Because change is one of the major problems causing conflict and dissention in the organization’s most valuable resource, its employees, this paper will review some of the possible causes of resistance to change and how to overcome them. Specifically, this research will focus on these particular aspects of implementing change within an organization: Why change? Who avoids change, and why? How to overcome resistance and implement change. Nothing endures but change. Heraclitus Why Change? Possibly one of the biggest problems with implementing a change in an organization is the fact that employees may view the change as unnecessary. As an example, The Farm Bank case (Brown/Harvey, 2006) illustrates how change can go wrong when it isn’t analyzed for its costs vs. benefits, well-planned – beginning to end, or even needed to begin with. In this case analysis, the CEO decides that the company needs to implement a new MIS program to assist with increased productivity, long-term planning, and decision making. Although he has good intentions, he dives right into the project and even creates a new management position......

Words: 1774 - Pages: 8