Free Essay

Organizational Communication

In: People

Submitted By azured
Words 5506
Pages 23
Organizational communication

1

Organizational communication
Organizational communication is a subfield of the larger discipline of communication studies. Organizational communication, as a field, is the consideration, analysis, and criticism of the role of communication in organizational contexts.

History of Organizational Communication
The field traces its lineage through business information, business communication, and early mass communication studies published in the 1930s through the 1950s. Until then, organizational communication as a discipline consisted of a few professors within speech departments who had a particular interest in speaking and writing in business settings. The current field is well established with its own theories and empirical concerns distinct from other communication subfields and other approaches to organizations. Several seminal publications stand out as works broadening the scope and recognizing the importance of communication in the organizing process, and in using the term "organizational communication". Nobel Laureate Herbert Simon wrote in 1947 about "organization communications systems", saying communication is "absolutely essential to organizations".[1] W. Charles Redding played a prominent role in the establishment of organizational communication as a discipline. In the 1950s, organizational communication focused largely on the role of communication in improving organizational life and organizational output. In the 1980s, the field turned away from a business-oriented approach to communication and became concerned more with the constitutive role of communication in organizing. In the 1990s, critical theory influence on the field was felt as organizational communication scholars focused more on communication's possibilities to oppress and liberate organizational members.

Assumptions underlying early organizational communication
Some of the main assumptions underlying much of the early organizational communication research were: • Humans act rationally. Sane people do not behave in rational ways, they generally have no access to all of the information needed to make rational decisions they could articulate, and therefore will make unrational decisions, unless there is some breakdown in the communication process—which is common. Unrational people rationalize how they will rationalize their communication measures whether or not it is rational. • Formal logic and empirically verifiable data ought to be the foundation upon which any theory should rest. All we really need to understand communication in organizations is (a) observable and replicable behaviors that can be transformed into variables by some form of measurement, and (b) formally replicable syllogisms that can extend theory from observed data to other groups and settings • Communication is primarily a mechanical process, in which a message is constructed and encoded by a sender, transmitted through some channel, then received and decoded by a receiver. Distortion, represented as any differences between the original and the received messages, can and ought to be identified and reduced or eliminated. • Organizations are mechanical things, in which the parts (including employees functioning in defined roles) are interchangeable. What works in one organization will work in another similar organization. Individual differences can be minimized or even eliminated with careful management techniques. • Organizations function as a container within which communication takes place. Any differences in form or function of communication between that occurring in an organization and in another setting can be identified and studied as factors affecting the communicative activity.

Organizational communication Herbert Simon introduced the concept of bounded rationality which challenged assumptions about the perfect rationality of communication participants. He maintained that people making decisions in organizations seldom had complete information, and that even if more information was available, they tended to pick the first acceptable option, rather than exploring further to pick the optimal solution. Through the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s the field expanded greatly in parallel with several other academic disciplines, looking at communication as more than an intentional act designed to transfer an idea. Research expanded beyond the issue of "how to make people understand what I am saying" to tackle questions such as "how does the act of communicating change, or even define, who I am?", "why do organizations that seem to be saying similar things achieve very different results?" and "to what extent are my relationships with others affected by our various organizational contexts?" In the early 1990s Peter Senge developed new theories on Organizational Communication. These theories were learning organization and systems thinking. These have been well received and are now a mainstay in current beliefs toward organizational communications.

2

Communication networks
Networks are another aspect of direction and flow of communication. Bavelas has shown that communication patterns, or networks, influence groups in several important ways. Communication networks may affect the group's completion of the assigned task on time, the position of the de facto leader in the group, or they may affect the group members' satisfaction from occupying certain positions in the network. Although these findings are based on laboratory experiments, they have important implications for the dynamics of communication in formal organizations. There are several patterns of communication: • • • • • "Chain", "Wheel", "Star", "All-Channel" network, "Circle".[2]

The Chain can readily be seen to represent the hierarchical pattern that characterizes strictly formal information flow, "from the top down," in military and some types of business organizations. The Wheel can be compared with a typical autocratic organization, meaning one-man rule and limited employee participation. The Star is similar to the basic formal structure of many organizations. The All-Channel network, which is an elaboration of Bavelas's Circle used by Guetzkow, is analogous to the free-flow of communication in a group that encourages all of its members to become involved in group decision processes. The All-Channel network may also be compared to some of the informal communication networks. If it's assumed that messages may move in both directions between stations in the networks, it is easy to see that some individuals occupy key positions with regard to the number of messages they handle and the degree to which they exercise control over the flow of information. For example, the person represented by the central dot in the "Star" handles all messages in the group. In contrast, individuals who occupy stations at the edges of the pattern handle fewer messages and have little or no control over the flow of information.These "peripheral" individuals can communicate with only one or two other persons and must depend entirely on others to relay their messages if they wish to extend their range. In reporting the results of experiments involving the Circle, Wheel, and Star configurations, Bavelas came to the following tentative conclusions. In patterns with positions located centrally, such as the Wheel and the Star, an organization quickly develops around the people occupying these central positions. In such patterns, the organization is more stable and errors in performance are lower than in patterns having a lower degree of centrality, such as the Circle. However, he also found that the morale of members in high centrality patterns is relatively low. Bavelas

Organizational communication speculated that this lower morale could, in the long run, lower the accuracy and speed of such networks. In problem solving requiring the pooling of data and judgments, or "insight," Bavelas suggested that the ability to evaluate partial results, to look at alternatives, and to restructure problems fell off rapidly when one person was able to assume a more central (that is, more controlling) position in the information flow. For example, insight into a problem requiring change would be less in the Wheel and the Star than in the Circle or the Chain because of the "bottlenecking" effect of data control by central members. It may be concluded from these laboratory results that the structure of communications within an organization will have a significant influence on the accuracy of decisions, the speed with which they can be reached, and the satisfaction of the people involved. Consequently, in networks in which the responsibility for initiating and passing along messages is shared more evenly among the members, the better the group's morale in the long run.

3

Direction of communication
If it's considered formal communications as they occur in traditional military organizations, messages have a "one-way" directional characteristic. In the military organization, the formal communication proceeds from superior to subordinate, and its content is presumably clear because it originates at a higher level of expertise and experience. Military communications also carry the additional assumption that the superior is responsible for making his communication clear and understandable to his subordinates. This type of organization assumes that there is little need for two-way exchanges between organizational levels except as they are initiated by a higher level. Because messages from superiors are considered to be more important than those from subordinates, the implicit rule is that communication channels, except for prescribed information flows, should not be cluttered by messages from subordinates but should remain open and free for messages moving down the chain of command. "Juniors should be seen and not heard," is still an unwritten, if not explicit, law of military protocol. Vestiges of one-way flows of communication still exist in many formal organizations outside the military, and for many of the same reasons as described above. Although management recognizes that prescribed information must flow both downward and upward, managers may not always be convinced that two-wayness should be encouraged. For example, to what extent is a subordinate free to communicate to his superior that he understands or does not understand a message? Is it possible for him to question the superior, ask for clarification, suggest modifications to instructions he has received, or transmit unsolicited messages to his superior, which are not prescribed by the rules? To what extent does the one-way rule of direction affect the efficiency of communication in the organization, in addition to the morale and motivation of subordinates? These are not merely procedural matters but include questions about the organizational climate, or psychological atmosphere in which communication takes place. Harold Leavitt has suggested a simple experiment that helps answer some of these questions.[3] А group is assigned the task of re-creating on paper a set of rectangular figures, first as they are described by the leader under one-way conditions, and second as they are described by the leader under two-way conditions.(A different configuration of rectangles is used in the second trial.) In the one-way trial, the leader's back is turned to the group. He describes the rectangles as he sees them. No one in the group is allowed to ask questions and no one may indicate by any audible or visible sign his understanding or his frustration as he attempts to follow the leader's directions. In the two-way trial, the leader faces the group. In this case, the group may ask for clarifications on his description of the rectangles and he can not only see but also can feel and respond to the emotional reactions of group members as they try to re-create his instructions on paper. On the basis of a number of experimental trials similar to the one described above, Leavitt formed these conclusions: 1. One-way communication is faster than two-way communication. 2. Two-way communication is more accurate than one-way communication. 3. Receivers are more sure of themselves and make more correct judgments of how right or wrong they are in the two-way system.

Organizational communication 4. The sender feels psychologically under attack in the two-way system, because his receivers pick up his mistakes and oversights and point them out to him. 5. The two-way method is relatively noisier and looks more disorderly. The one-way method, on the other hand, appears neat and efficient to an outside observer.[3] Thus, if speed is necessary, if a businesslike appearance is important, if a manager does not want his mistakes recognized, and if he wants to protect his power, then one-way communication seems preferable. In contrast, if the manager wants to get his message across, or if he is concerned about his receivers' feeling that they are participating and are making a contribution, the two-way system is better.

4

Interpersonal communication
Another facet of communication in the organization is the process of face-to-face or interpersonal communication, between individuals. Such communication may take several forms. Messages may be verbal (that is, expressed in words), or they may not involve words at all but consist of gestures, facial expressions, and certain postures ("body language"). Nonverbal messages may even stem from silence.[4] Managers do not need answers to Training meeting about sustainable design. The photo shows a training meeting with operate a successful business; they factory workers in a stainless steel ecodesign company from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. An need questions. Answers can come example of interpersonal communication from anyone, anytime, anywhere in the world thanks to the benefits of all the electronic communication tools at our disposal. This has turned the real job of management into determining what it is the business needs to know, along with the who/what/where/when and how of learning it. To effectively solve problems, seize opportunities, and achieve objectives, questions need to be asked by managers—these are the people responsible for the operation of the enterprise as a whole.[5] Ideally, the meanings sent are the meanings received. This is most often the case when the messages concern something that can be verified objectively. For example, "This piece of pipe fits the threads on the coupling." In this case, the receiver of the message can check the sender's words by actual trial, if necessary. However, when the sender's words describe a feeling or an opinion about something that cannot be checked objectively, meanings can be very unclear. "This work is too hard" or "Watergate was politically justified" are examples of opinions or feelings that cannot be verified. Thus they are subject to interpretation and hence to distorted meanings. The receiver's background of experience and learning may differ enough from that of the sender to cause significantly different perceptions and evaluations of the topic under discussion. As we shall see later, such differences form a basic barrier to communication.[4] Nonverbal content always accompanies the verbal content of messages. This is reasonably clear in the case of face-to-face communication. As Virginia Satir has pointed out, people cannot help but communicate symbolically (for example, through their clothing or possessions) or through some form of body language. In messages that are conveyed by the telephone, a messenger, or a letter, the situation or context in which the message is sent becomes part of its non-verbal content. For example, if the company has been losing money, and in a letter to the production

Organizational communication division, the front office orders a reorganization of the shipping and receiving departments, this could be construed to mean that some people were going to lose their jobs — unless it were made explicitly clear that this would not occur.[6] A number of variables influence the effectiveness of communication. Some are found in the environment in which communication takes place, some in the personalities of the sender and the receiver, and some in the relationship that exists between sender and receiver. These different variables suggest some of the difficulties of communicating with understanding between two people. The sender wants to formulate an idea and communicate it to the receiver. This desire to communicate may arise from his thoughts or feelings or it may have been triggered by something in the environment. The communication may also be influenced by the relationship between the sender and the receiver, such as status differences, a staff-line relationship, or a learner-teacher relationship.[6] Whatever its origin, information travels through a series of filters, both in the sender and in the receiver, and is affected by different channels, before the idea can be transmitted and re-created in the receiver's mind. Physical capacities to see, hear, smell, taste, and touch vary between people, so that the image of reality may be distorted even before the mind goes to work. In addition to physical or sense filters, cognitive filters, or the way in which an individual's mind interprets the world around him, will influence his assumptions and feelings. These filters will determine what the sender of a message says, how he says it, and with what purpose. Filters are present also in the receiver, creating a double complexity that once led Robert Louis Stevenson to say that human communication is "doubly relative". It takes one person to say something and another to decide what he said.[7] Physical and cognitive, including semantic filters (which decide the meaning of words) combine to form a part of our memory system that helps us respond to reality. In this sense, March and Simon compare a person to a data processing system. Behavior results from an interaction between a person's internal state and environmental stimuli. What we have learned through past experience becomes an inventory, or data bank, consisting of values or goals, sets of expectations and preconceptions about the consequences of acting one way or another, and a variety of possible ways of responding to the situation. This memory system determines what things we will notice and respond to in the environment. At the same time, stimuli in the environment help to determine what parts of the memory system will be activated. Hence, the memory and the environment form an interactive system that causes our behavior. As this interactive system responds to new experiences, new learnings occur which feed back into memory and gradually change its content. This process is how people adapt to a changing world.[7]

5

Communication Approaches in an Organization
Informal and Formal Communication are used in an organization. Informal communication, generally associated with interpersonal, horizontal communication, was primarily seen as a potential hindrance to effective organizational performance. This is no longer the case. Informal communication has become more important to ensuring the effective conduct of work in modern organizations. Top-down approach: This is also known as downward communication. This approach is used by the Top Level Management to communicate to the lower levels. This is used to implement policies, gudelines, etc. In this type of organizational communication, distortion of the actual information occurs. This could be made effective by feedbacks.

Organizational communication

6

Research in organizational communication
Research methodologies
Historically, organizational communication was driven primarily by quantitative research methodologies. Included in functional organizational communication research are statistical analyses (such as surveys, text indexing, network mapping and behavior modeling). In the early 1980s, the interpretive revolution took place in organizational communication. In Putnam and Pacanowsky's 1983 text Communication and Organizations: An Interpretive Approach. they argued for opening up methodological space for qualitative approaches such as narrative analyses, participant-observation, interviewing, rhetoric and textual approaches readings) and philosophic inquiries. During the 1980s and 1990s critical organizational scholarship began to gain prominence with a focus on issues of gender, race, class, and power/knowledge. In its current state, the study of organizational communication is open methodologically, with research from post-positive, interpretive, critical, postmodern, and discursive paradigms being published regularly. Organizational communication scholarship appears in a number of communication journals including but not limited to Management Communication Quarterly [8], Journal of Applied Communication Research [9], Communication Monographs [10], Academy of Management Journal [11], Communication Studies [12], and Southern Communication Journal [13]. New ways for scholars to communicating within an organization by bring in a postcolonial perspective. In recent years, Other voices are beginning to be recorded in organizational communication, especially in areas such as gender (e.g., see Ashcraft & Mumby, 2004; Mumby, 1993), race (e.g., see Ashcraft & Allen, 2003), and globalization (e.g., see Stohl, 2001). In fact, in a deeply reflexive article, “Thinking Differently About Organizational Communication,”George Cheney (2000) says that “taking difference seriously means not only allowing the Other to speak but also being open to the possibility that the Other’s perspective may come to influence or even supplant your own” (p. 140). Yet,despite such interventions, one key aspect in the dynamics of identity has not received much attention in organizational communication—postcolonial subjectivity and the mestiza consciousness born of being in the borderlands. Anzaldúa’s concept of mestiza consciousness transcends the nature of black-and-white theorizing and looks at issues of identity as multiple coexisting levels of subjectivities. The complex intersections between multiple subjectivities of issues of race, gender, class, ethnicity, and language remain underhighlighted in much of organizational communication scholarship and, yet, these are central to becoming sensitive to a postcolonial vision of our disciplinary future. In terms of imagining a postcolonial rationality, Harvard-based, Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen draws on his multiple subjectivities to turn traditional utility theory economics on its head and argue instead for a more humane welfare economics—a body of scholarship that has grown from his own subjective experiences of famines caused by colonial policies in pre-independence India (Sen, 1981, 1987). For Sen (1992), it is not enough to talk about achieving equality in income distribution, for such a rhetoric of equality conceals the “substantive inequalities in, say, wellbeing and freedom arising out of such a distribution given the disparate personal and social circumstances of each individual” (p. 30). At this point, it would be easy to think that concerns with postcolonial subjectivity, organizing, voice, and rationality rest fully within the empirical domain of our disciplinary partners of sociology, anthropology, literature,political science, economics, and history, to name a few. Banerjee and Linstead (2004), in fact, note that explicit political agendas, such as that of postcolonial thought, have never rested easily in organization studies. Few studies using a postcolonial frame exist and many are included in an edited volume by Anshuman Prasad (2003) entitled Postcolonial Theory and Organizational Analysis. As Prasad (2003) makes clear, a postcolonial perspective can be productive in exposing neocolonial assumptions underlying management disciplines, describing neocolonialism as a continuationof Western colonialism through political, economic, and cultural control(Banerjee & Linstead, 2004).

Organizational communication When we as scholars unthinkingly adopt the discourse and knowledge of mainstream Euro-American organizational communication scholarship,we potentially absorb, without reflection, a particular way of understanding the world. In conclusion, what we are trying to imagine here and what can be seen in the exemplars above is a form of “writing back to the center,”where scholars from the disciplinary and epistemic margins of organizational communication write about their own cultured forms of organizing practices,using their experiences and ways of knowing to talk back to, reframe, contextualize,and perhaps even reinterpret commonly used theories and concepts within our field. For those scholars, living and working in Asia, Africa,South America, or the Asia-Pacific region, for example, this means learning from and supporting the multiple forms of cultural knowledge around organizing and communicating that are native to their region. Disseminating work by native scholars of their contexts using native forms of knowing diversifies the field of organizational communication as well as the knowledge produced and consumed there, providing all members of our scholarly community with a richer array of concepts, methods, forms, and perspectives from which to understand our increasingly complex and globalized reality. In engaging in such an enterprise, we begin to reimagine the scholarly community of organizational communication as a transdisciplinary and transgeographical entity capable of disrupting contemporary hierarchies of knowledge and making sense of our flattening world. With this goal in mind, we request and look forward to lively conversations with scholars from within the traditionally defined discipline of organizational communication as well as those outside, as we work together to recognize, support, and engage diverse voices and contexts as well as multiple ways of organizing and communicating. References: Ashcraft, K. (2006). Falling from a humble perch? Rereading organizational communication studies with an attitude of alliance. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 645–652. Ashcraft, K., & Allen, B. (2003). Cheney, G. (2000). Thinking differently about organizational communication: Why, how, and where? Management Communication Quarterly, 14(1), 132–141. Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford, UK: Clarendon. Sen, A. (1987). On ethics and economics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Banerjee, S. B., & Linstead, S. (2004). Masking subversion: Neocolonial embeddedness in anthropological accounts of indigenous management. Human Relations, 57(2), 221–247.

7

Current Research Topics in Organizational Communication
The field of organizational communication has moved from acceptance of mechanistic models (e.g., information moving from a sender to a receiver) to a study of the persistent, hegemonic and taken-for-granted ways in which we not only use communication to accomplish certain tasks within organizational settings (e.g., public speaking) but also how the organizations in which we participate affect us. These approaches include "postmodern", "critical", "participatory", "feminist", "power/political", "organic", etc. and adds to disciplines as wide-ranging as sociology, philosophy, theology, psychology, business, business administration, institutional management, medicine (health communication), neurology (neural nets), semiotics, anthropology, international relations, and music. Currently, some topics of research and theory in the field are: Constitution, e.g., • how communicative behaviors construct or modify organizing processes or products • how the organizations within which we interact affect our communicative behaviors, and through these, our own identities • structures other than organizations which might be constituted through our communicative activity (e.g., markets, cooperatives, tribes, political parties, social movements) • when does something "become" an organization? When does an organization become (an)other thing(s)? Can one organization "house" another? Is the organization still a useful entity/thing/concept, or has the social/political environment changed so much that what we now call "organization" is so different from the organization of even

Organizational communication a few decades ago that it cannot be usefully tagged with the same word – "organization"? Narrative, e.g., • how do group members employ narrative to acculturate/initiate/indoctrinate new members? • do organizational stories act on different levels? Are different narratives purposively invoked to achieve specific outcomes, or are there specific roles of "organizational storyteller"? If so, are stories told by the storyteller received differently than those told by others in the organization? • in what ways does the organization attempt to influence storytelling about the organization? under what conditions does the organization appear to be more or less effective in obtaining a desired outcome? • when these stories conflict with one another or with official rules/policies, how are the conflicts worked out? in situations in which alternative accounts are available, who or how or why are some accepted and others rejected? Identity, e.g., • who do we see ourselves to be, in terms of our organizational affiliations? • do communicative behaviors or occurrences in one or more of the organizations in which we participate effect changes in us? To what extent do we consist of the organizations to which we belong? • is it possible for individuals to successfully resist organizational identity? what would that look like? • do people who define themselves by their work-organizational membership communicate differently within the organizational setting than people who define themselves more by an avocational (non-vocational) set of relationships? • for example, researchers have studied how human service workers and firefighters use humor at their jobs as a way to affirm their identity in the face of various challenges Tracy, S.J.; K. K. Myers; C. W. Scott (2006). "Cracking Jokes and Crafting Selves: Sensemaking and Identity Management Among Human Service Workers". Communication Monographs 73: 283–308. doi:10.1080/03637750600889500.. Others have examined the identities of police organizations, prison guards, and professional women workers. Interrelatedness of organizational experiences, e.g., • how do our communicative interactions in one organizational setting affect our communicative actions in other organizational settings? • how do the phenomenological experiences of participants in a particular organizational setting effect changes in other areas of their lives? • when the organizational status of a member is significantly changed (e.g., by promotion or expulsion) how are their other organizational memberships affected? • what kind of future relationship between business and society does organizational communication seem to predict? Power e.g., • how does the use of particular communicative practices within an organizational setting reinforce or alter the various interrelated power relationships within the setting? Are the potential responses of those within or around these organizational settings constrained by factors or processes either within or outside of the organization – (assuming there is an "outside"? • do taken-for-granted organizational practices work to fortify the dominant hegemonic narrative? Do individuals resist/confront these practices, through what actions/agencies, and to what effects? • do status changes in an organization (e.g., promotions, demotions, restructuring, financial/social strata changes) change communicative behavior? Are there criteria employed by organizational members to differentiate between "legitimate" (i.e., endorsed by the formal organizational structure) and "illegitimate" (i.e., opposed by or unknown to the formal power structure)? Are behaviors? When are they successful, and what do we even there "pretenders" or "usurpers" who employ these communicativemean by "successful?"

8

Organizational communication

9

Notes
[1] Herbert Simon, Administrative Behavior, 4th ed., p 208. [2] Summarized from concepts developed by Alex Bavelas, "Communication Patterns in Task-Oriented Groups," pp. 503–11; Harold Guetzkow, "Differentiation of Roles in Task-Oriented Groups," pp. 512–26, in Cartwright and Zander, Group Dynamics; H.J. Leavitt, "Some Effects of Certain Communication Patterns on Group Performance," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology vol. 46, (January 1951), pp. 38–50. [3] Harold Leavitt, Managerial Psychology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), pp. 118–28. [4] Richard Arvid Johnson (1976). Management, systems, and society : an introduction. Pacific Palisades, Calif.: Goodyear Pub. Co.. pp. 148–142. ISBN 0876205406 9780876205402. OCLC 2299496. [5] Terry, J. F. (2008). The Art of Asking: Ask Better Questions, Get Better Answers. FT Press. [6] Virginia Satir (1967). Conjoint family therapy; a guide to theory and technique. Palo Alto, Calif.: Science and Behavior Books. pp. 76–81. OCLC 187068. [7] James G March; Herbert A Simon (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley. pp. 9–11. ISBN 0471567930 9780471567936. OCLC 1329335. [8] http:/ / mcq. sagepub. com/ [9] http:/ / www. tandf. co. uk/ journals/ titles/ 00909882. asp/ [10] http:/ / www. tandf. co. uk/ journals/ titles/ 03637751. asp/ [11] http:/ / www. aom. pace. edu/ amjnew/ [12] http:/ / www. tandf. co. uk/ journals/ titles/ 10510974. asp/ [13] http:/ / www. tandf. co. uk/ journals/ titles/ 1041794x. asp/

References
• Gergen, Kenneth and Tojo Joseph. 1996. "Psychological Science in a Postmodern Context." American Psychologist. October 2001. Vol. 56. Issue 10. p803-813 • Redding, W. Charles. 1985. "Stumbling Toward Identity: The Emergence of Organizational Communication as a Field of Study" in McPhee and Tompkins, Organizational Communication: Traditional Themes and New Directions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • May, Steve and Mumby, Dennis K. 2005. "Engaging Organizational Communication Theory and Research." Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Cheney, G., Christensen, L.T., Zorn, T.E., and Ganesh, S. 2004. Organizational Communication in an Age of Globalization: Issues, Reflections, Practices." Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

External links
• Organizational Communication (http://www.knoow.net/en/sceconent/management/communication.htm) in knoow.net • European Public Relations Education and Research Association (http://www.euprera.org/) • International Communication Association (http://www.icahdq.org/) • National Communication Association (http://www.natcom.org/) • Association for Business Communication (http://www.businesscommunication.org/) • International Association of Business Communicators (http://www.iabc.com/) • Basics in Internal Organizational Communications (http://www.mapnp.org/library/mrktng/org_cmm.htm) by Carter McNamara • Multi-Axial Modular Organizational Survey (open source) (http://members.optusnet.com.au/jcpatrick/) • Association of Teachers of Technical Writing (http://cms.english.ttu.edu/attw) • Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication (http://www.cptsc.org/) • IEEE Professional Communication Society (http://www.ieeepcs.org) • Technical Communicators Association of New Zealand (http://www.tcanz.org.nz) • Tekom (http://www.tekom.de) (pages available in English) Professional organization for technical communication, Germany • Elephant (http://elephant.org.il) (pages available in English) Professional organization for Technical Writers, Israel

Organizational communication • FTI (http://fti.org.se/) (in Swedish) Professional organization for Technical Writers, Sweden

10

Article Sources and Contributors

11

Article Sources and Contributors
Organizational communication Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=431462948 Contributors: Abbas123, Adammaxis, Alan Liefting, Alex Rio Brazil, Andreat143, BD2412, Blustar32, Bobo192, Bonadea, Borgx, Brendenkendall, Buridan, CQ, Chocolatesyrup, Claudine McClean, Closedmouth, Constant Parrhesia, DMacks, DanBealeCocks, David A. Victor, Dianelombardi, Dina, Discospinster, DoubleBlue, Dr. Chuck, Dtgriffith, Dylanfranco1, Emmaps, Euthman2001, FrankRoche, Freakofnurture, FreplySpang, Gdolan, Gimboid13, Ginawoo, Giraffedata, Greentea4, Habermas, HalfShadow, Hjammal01, Irrc irri, J9harris, JasonSWrench, Jeff3000, Jhez, JimR, Jishacj, Jusdafax, K5a5p, Kenny sh, Khatru2, Lanma726, Limonns, Lori03, Lquilter, Mailaura, Malcolmxl5, Mbell, Mckeld97, Michael Hardy, Misza13, MsPR313, Muelle69, Nad, Padler, Penbat, Ppsassociates, Prokopenya Viktor, Rgathercoal, Richard David Ramsey, Rjwilmsi, Robth, Rufwork, SCEhardt, Sam Hocevar, Sunray, Superbeecat, The Thing That Should Not Be, Thseamon, Tobias Bergemann, Turtle13, Versageek, Versus22, Wasted Time R, WikiLeon, Woohookitty, Ybk33, Zoole, Zzuuzz, 149 anonymous edits

Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors
File:Training meeting in a ecodesign stainless steel company in brazil.JPG Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Training_meeting_in_a_ecodesign_stainless_steel_company_in_b

razil.JPG License: Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Contributors: Alex Rio Brazil

License
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported http:/ / creativecommons. org/ licenses/ by-sa/ 3. 0/

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Organizational Behavior and Communication

...Google’s Organizational Behavior and Communication Lisa Delgado COM/530 Communications for Accountants April 16, 2012 Ismael Hau-Rosa Google’s Organizational Behavior and Communication Google, Inc., a worldwide renowned search engine company that offers an array of project applications, including Internet search, cloud computing, and advertising, uses its espoused values to align with its enacted values. Google understands that the communication within its organization is strongly determined by their organizational culture. In developing a very distinctive and influential culture, such as Google’s, it allows their employees to be innovative and creative and they embody the company’s values and share the same aspiration for an unlimited amount of information. Since Google began in 1996 and became incorporated in 1998, Google’s mission is “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.” Google’s espoused values have been an intricate principle for the company because it has created a high standard of how top management envisions how the company should run. Google clearly presents its values with allowing casual dress code and encouraging employees to communicate upwardly with upper...

Words: 886 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Organizational Behavior and Communication Paper

...Organizational Behavior and Communication Paper COM/530 Organizational Behavior and Communication The nation’s military men and women should be celebrated more often. These men and women dedicate their lives to serving our country and make the ultimate sacrifice. Marines in particular seem to have a special bond, and set of ethics and values they make a lifetime commitment to. When a marine hears the Latin term Semper Fi, it does not just mean “always faithful” to that marine like it would a civilian. Marines are trained the term Semper Fi takes on a whole new meaning, Semper Fi has been an expression of the marines since 1883. This simple phrase takes them way beyond teamwork, and the marines know they can count on each other, will be faithful to one another, and the mission at hand, no matter what. Once a person is a marine that is something that cannot be undone, and these words will always remind the marine of that. Culture The culture of the United States Marine Corps is connected by the principals and values the marines share. “Honor, courage and commitment are the values that guide us Semper Fidelis is the motto that bonds us. To guard our nation is to guard its principles, becoming not only an elite warrior, but also a noble one” ("Marine Corps", 2012). The official and unofficial traditions of the Marine Corps strengthen the camaraderie of the service. There is an emphasis placed on performing morally on and off duty in all aspects of the...

Words: 953 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Organizational Commitment and Communication

...Organizational Commitment and Communication Patti Garbacz University of Phoenix COM/530 May 6, 2013 Robert Kolber Abstract Many organizational behaviors influence group communication: what is communicated and how it is done. These traits include leadership styles, sources of power, motivation and culture, and commitment of the employees to the organization. Leadership Styles and Communication Walt Disney was a charismatic leader who shared his vision of creating “one of the world's leading producers and providers of entertainment and information,” and “seeking to develop the most creative, innovative and profitable entertainment experiences and related products in the world"1 (retailindustry). He communicated this vision to all his employees and encouraged them to adopt it as their own. This was done by creating an extensive orientation and training program for his employees. They were encouraged to treat their customers as guests. They conduct peer interviews using those peers as role models who personalize the communication of company policies and procedures for each position. After 30 days, new employees participate in a mutual evaluation where supervisors discuss job performance and cast members have an opportunity to evaluate how well they were prepared for the job. Disney also uses closed-circuit television to inform cast members about company-wide events (Miller, 1992). The use of employee surveys and emphasis on imagination is an example......

Words: 1152 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Organizational Communication

...Organizational Communication National American University Abstract Communication is a daily part of everyone’s personal and professional life. It can influence the success of relationships as well as organizations. It is, however, the way information is delivered that determines whether the communication is successful or not. There are many people working within an organization and communication is one of the essential attributes for reaching the common goals and visions. In the following, elements of effective communication are defined and compared to communication within Prestige Real Estate. Communication is considered one of the basic concepts in both a person’s personal and professional life. An organization’s existence is built on communication. Even though this process is often taken for granted, communication allows people to coordinate and collaborate actions, make important decisions affecting many people and most importantly it is allows the organization to function as an entity. Communication serves as the link that binds different functions, groups and individuals together creating a unified whole. Communication is often misunderstood or not interpreted correctly; therefore, effective communication is the key for all types of organizations in order to be successful (Church, 1996). In today’s world, the ability to communicate effectively is tied closely to the success of the organization. Modern organizations seek people that are smart with their words....

Words: 1809 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Organizational Communication

...Organizational culture and organizational communication are related explicitly through the direction of communication and the common characteristics of an organizational culture. Organizational communication fosters a strong and productive organizational culture. One of the vital common characteristics of an organizational culture is innovation and risk taking. “Upward communication flows to a higher level in the group or organization. It’s used to provide feedback to higher-ups, inform them of progress toward goals, and relay current problems” (Robbins & Judge, 2011, ). If the organization does not encourage upward communication, the lack of feedback from the employees will eliminate the generation of new ideas. The employees will not suggest any new techniques or any new methods that could improve their efficiency or effectiveness for their job. Instead, they will continue to adhere to the current methods and procedures. The example below supports this concept in organization A. “Creative decisions that incur significant change or risk are not encouraged. Because managers of failed projects are openly criticized and penalized, managers try not to implement ideas that deviate much from the status quo. One lower-level manager quoted an often-used phrase in the company: “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” (Robbins & Judge, 2011, ). However, if the employees are encouraged participate in upward communication, the organizations culture would allow the generation of......

Words: 360 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Organizational Behavior and Communication

...Organizational Behavior and Communication Laura Strickland ACC/530 October 24, 2014 Bryon K. Johnson Organizational Behavior and Communication Starbucks, a place to receive the best coffee at a convenient location, while experiencing a unique interaction with individuals trained to provide the best customer service possible. This was the desire of three friends when Starbucks was established 43 years ago. The research in this paper will briefly describe Starbucks culture, and how the espouse values align with their enact values and the extent of their communication; the role communication plays in perception and culture when misalignment divides espouse value and enact value; and how conflict improves communication within the company. Culture of Starbucks Starbucks culture focuses on the environment and presenting the best quality product to their customers. Starbucks culture foundation was designed by creating the ultimate coffeehouse experience, and hiring a diverse and passionate workforce. Starbucks’ mission statement is as follows: “to inspire and nurture the human spirit – one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time” (Starbucks, 2014). Starbucks was in Fortune Magazine for being one of the best companies to work for. This company is famously known for providing a work environment that shows respect and dignity to all. Every organization is defined by how their people act and communicate. Starbucks commitment to social awareness has created a strong......

Words: 889 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Organizational Communication

...Conflict at the Legion Valerie Post vpost@capellauniversity.edu Fundamentals of Organizational Communication BUS3050 Julie Sahlin 3/6/2014 Introduction Recently a new bar steward was hired to overlook and improve the financial asset of the American Legion. His responsibilities included managing all employees, inventory control, and bookkeeping amongst other things. After closely monitoring the sales and employees the newly hired bar steward made the board of directors aware of a particular employee. Items were missing after every shift. A special committee was directed to look into these actions and report back to the board with the findings. The committee took it upon themselves to fire the bar steward and continue to let the employees do as they wish. Initially the employee may have won the battle but did they win the war? Overview of the Organization and Case Study As with any organization politics are always a major factor. This was no different for an American Legion. While it serves as an organization for veterans and their families, their always seems to be a lack of effective communication. Problems arise within the organization that some may find irrelevant to their positions but regardless it sometimes moves it up to the board for a final decision to be made. The board of directors consists of a commander, vice commander and officers. All decisions regarding the legion and members must be passed through the approval of the board. The legion has......

Words: 1429 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Organizational Communication

...Organizational Commitment and Communication Com 503 University of Phoenix Sep 13, 2001 Brian Williams Different Leadership Styles As today’s world becomes more diverse with different cultures and up brings, so will this diversity within the business office. Then work force becomes younger and younger, the enthusiasm to be the “next be thing” leadership styles become more divers in the work place to achieve that goal whether its for an individual or a group. The next paragraphs will discuss how different leadership styles would affect group communication at Cisco. The Visionary Leader style is best when a new direction and a very strong impact on the climate is needed moves people towards a common vision, telling them where to go but not how to get there - motivating them to struggle forwards. They openly share information, hence giving knowledge power to others. The styles is crucial to Cisco especially in the research and Development department, where employees can use their creativity to improvise and develop new ideas for company growth. The Coaching Leader connects individual wants to organizational goals, used when individuals need to build long-term capabilities and positive impacts on the climate. They are good at delegating challenging assignments, demonstrating faith that demands justification, holding long conversations that reach beyond the workplace, helping people find strengths and weaknesses and tying these to career......

Words: 1864 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Organizational Communication

...Organizational Communication Analysis Part I: Descriptive Framework Paper Page 1 Organizational Communication Analysis Part I: Descriptive Framework Paper University of Phoenix COM/450 Scott Sanderson Riordan Manufacturing Inc. is a company that leads most other companies in the industry of plastic molding. Their state of the art company has learned to design plastic into almost any form and has received high accommodations from around the world based on their work. It has become a Fortune 1000 company and continues to grow while attempting to stay in check with the update in technology. There are multiple facilities around the country and as of recently the company has gone global and has a plant in China. Employees work under the heirachy of a what many larger companies are involved in, with managers and managers above managers keeping tabs on lower employees. The clients of the company are usually stakeholder who hold a small amount of control over the decisions the company makes based on how much stock they own. However, large and important decisions are made specifically by C.E.O.’s and other higher ups within the company. Their services entail being able to inject plastic into any form or shape for an eventual act of holding liquid. Like any major company, Riordan sets regular meetings with the people who are in charge of their respective parts of the company and sets meetings regularly to keep everyone on pace. These ...

Words: 560 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Interpersonal and Organizational Communication

...Interpersonal and Organizational Communication By: Adela Lopez Communication is the mechanism of sending and receiving a message between sender and receiver. However, communication encompasses much more than the passing of information. For communication to be effective there needs to be a mutual understanding of presented information. Communication is also entrusted upon to instruct, inform, and educate individuals. The communication process can accomplish a lot more than only sharing information, it can build valuable relationships between the sender and the receiver. The communication process can be explained through a communication process model. In the Communication Process Model, information is sent from the sender to the receiver through a communication channel, mostly verbally or electronically. As this is occurring, the information is then encoded into a form that the sender regards the receiver will decode and interpret easily. From there, the message would have been presumed to be confirmed and understood by both the sender and the receiver. To ensure that the message has been encoded and decoded efficiently by both the sender and receiver, clarifying questions are asked by either party. The process of effective communication at a deeper look not only involves the mutual sharing and understanding of information, it includes the non verbal elements of understanding feelings, thoughts, wants, needs, and intensions of those involved in the communication process......

Words: 1334 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Challenge of Organizational Communications

...The Challenge of Organizational Communication The United States faces many threats and tragedies on a day-to-day basis. Many of those horrific events are occurrences that have helped mold this country for the better. The communication domains considered in Chapter 1: The Challenge of Organizational Communication consist of Rhetorical, Semiotic, Phenomenological, Cybernetic, Sociopsychological, Sociocultural and Critical devices. These domains approach the organizational issues that arose in events, such as, the Mass Shooting that took place at Emanuel A.M.E. Church in Charleston, South Carolina. These different lenses help us better understand the complexity of the organizational communication processes. (Miller 13) One of the seven domains include the Rhetorical approach. The Rhetorical approach, according to Katherine Miller, Professor at Arizona State University, is "the practical art of discourse” which, in organizational context means "Considering the communication strategies of organizational leaders during times of crisis.”(Miller 14) The event that took place that evening was instantaneously thrown into the media circuit. Influential figures from across the world began expressing their grief by taking to verbal interviews, social media, as well as holding press conferences . Public Political leaders such as President Barack Obama, Governor Nikki Haley, Charleston Mayor Joseph P. Riley, Jr., became vessels for the Charleston community . President Obama......

Words: 440 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Organizational Communication

...Organizational Communication, Speeches and Conversations. Com520 Organizational Communication Communication is key in any dynamic environment. It is how a person communicates that dictates how anything will be completed. To effectively communicate in business, it’s important to immediately emphasize the importance of the message that is being delivered. As the speaker you have to be informative, engaged, actively listen, clear, and concise. To achieve all of this you have to know your audience well. It is called taking the audience centered approach. When conveying the message effectively the audience will respond with positive feedback. There are instances where there are barriers to effective organizational communication. These barriers can change and block the intended message to the audience. It would affect their ability to receive, decode, and respond to the message. Some barriers are noise and distractions, filters, contending messages, and channel breakdowns. As the speaker you have to be aware of the internal and external barriers that can block your message. Filters can distort the message between the speaker and the audience. Channel breakdowns can destroy the intended message because depending on the method of delivery the message may not get to its target or the message may get misconstrued all together. Noise and distractions are external barriers such as cell phone usage, computers screens, I.M pop ups etc. The internal barriers......

Words: 1201 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Group and Organizational Communication

...Group and Organizational Communication Introduction Communication is a silent infiltrator, having broad influence over our social environment. It provides us with a mode for conveying messages without the use of verbal language. It regulates relationships by affecting the likelihood of introduction and continued interaction. We are able to infer emotion through communication and influence other's perception of our competence, power and vulnerability[1]. It also plays a role in the perception of the actual message we are trying to convey. It affects our lives in a myriad of ways from childhood throughout adulthood, and as long as we intend to communicate with others. Communication is the process of creating and sharing information with one another. Rapid changes in technology, transportation and immigration are making the world into a small-intersected community, where understanding how different cultures communicate is extremely important. In order to achieve effective intercultural communication we have to understand how different cultures communicate[2]. Communication styles differ by how power is distributed within an organization. There are essentially two types: hierarchical, and democratic. In a hierarchical structure the most power is held by the highest ranking individual, where as in a democratic structure[3]. Processes, functions, and components of organizational communication Everyone's different. We all have different parents, different......

Words: 1793 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Organizational Communication

...It's all about communication… «Only through communication the human life can hold meaning», mentions Paulo Freire, Brazilian psychologist and educator and I totally agree with him because nowadays communication is a very important factor that can help you to be more successful and reputable person in the world and especially at work. Let's see three most important aspects of effective communication. Listening: I think that the most important thin in communication is to listen to your interlocutor in order to understand what he is trying to express, answer or make feedback or reply and then continue the conversation. It is important because if you will not listen you won't be able to grasp the idea of the talk and no reply will be made from your side. If that happens, your companion will bethink that he/she is not interesting to you, the topic is too boring and soon the conversation will stop. So, to be successful communicator you must hear and follow your partner and off course demonstrate interest from your part if you want the dialogue to bear fruit. For example if during a business meeting the communicator will be telling the issue in a company and asking for a list of proposals or solutions and you are not listening to what he is saying you will never be able to provide with possible decisions and you will be useful for the company and maybe have even......

Words: 633 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Organizational Commitment and Communication

...Organizational Commitment and Communication Sarah Harris COM/530 April 2, 2012 Brent Smith Organizational Commitment and Communication Leadership is primarily expected from managers but at Google, employees themselves take on an active leadership role in the organization. At Google, there is no one right leadership styles. Different leadership styles are used based on the situation. The varying leadership styles encourage and promote employee involvement, problem solving, and decision making. The type of communication that develops between management and the employees is controlled by the leadership style and is the basis for everything that happens at Google. Leadership Styles Affect on Group Communication Leadership styles affect communication; they can slow down the process or distort the information employees need to do their jobs. Participative, visionary, and transformational leadership styles tend to promote openness and encourage creativity, innovation, and ideas. Charismatic leadership, tends to inhibit group communication that does not promote the leader’s idea and autocratic leadership ignores communication altogether. Transformational leadership promotes communication because the success depends on the creation of a shared vision. This shared vision is accomplished by effective communication of goals and ways to achieve them. This communication also motivates and adds enthusiasm to the group (Robbins & Judge, 2011). Transformational style......

Words: 1747 - Pages: 7