Outcomes of the Civil War

In: Historical Events

Submitted By Wolf11934
Words 1517
Pages 7
Outcomes of the Civil War |
How could the outcome of the Civil War been changed? |

The Civil War was won by the Union but what would have happened if the Confederates would have won? What would have happened if the Union had won earlier? What would the outcome have been if new technologies had been implemented? These are questions that are not easy to answer. These questions demand speculation and assumptions that are not provable. The best guesses of different outcomes are all we have to work with.
The first question, what if the Confederates had won, has many different outcomes. The most likely outcome of this is that the United States would have become five different countries. The Union and the Confederates are obvious but Texas and California would have pushed to become sovereign countries. Utah would have become the fifth country by becoming a Church State. The northwest States probably would have rejoined the Union in the 1930’s due to the Great Depression.
Abraham Lincoln may not have been assassinated since John Wilkes Booth did not have a motive for the killing. Lincoln would have finished his career as a senator after twenty years. He would have written his memoirs after the war with many thousands of copies sold mainly in the south.
Robert E. Lee would have become Confederate President Jefferson Davis's special envoy to the United States. But the strain of the job, and trying to maintain friendly relations with a former enemy, would have led to an early death in 1870.
All five countries would have participated in World War Two but each would have had their own commanders. General Dwight D. Eisenhower would have commanded the forces from Texas, while General George s. Patton would have led the Confederate forces. General Omar Bradley would have commanded the US forces. After the war, all five American countries would have…...

Similar Documents

Civil War

...The Civil War Past civil wars during 1861 and 1865 have claimed the lives of many individuals who fought for freedom and against. Team B will express views of four wars through each member’s diversified backgrounds. The Battle of Shiloh, The Battle of Stones River both fought in Tennessee, and The Battle of Bull Run in Virginia as well as The Battle of Gettysburg in Pennsylvania. According to "Africans In America" (1998), “On April 18, 1865, the Civil War ended with the surrender of the Confederate army. 617,000 Americans had died in the war, approximately the same number as in all of America's other wars combined” (Para. 18). In fact, theses wars with others have seemed to position a lasting stance on freedom for Americans no matter what color individuals appeared. Team B’s review of the civil wars may express what is unknown to some individuals, and what others family member fought for years ago. Even though civil wars caused death, if changes had not happen many Americans may still be slaves. Civil war was needed to stop the opposing thoughts of diversity in America. Because, of the foundation set in America for everyone, which appeared to outcast some chosen groups normally in the southern states. North and south states viewed certain individuals as unequal to other humans rendering freedom to those entities. Why the South lost the Civil War “If the Southern generals like Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson were so brilliant, and if the South lost fewer men...

Words: 1501 - Pages: 7

Civil War

...David Cornejo May 24, 2011 Social Studies Period 2 Civil War Writing Prompt There were many reasons why the civil war began, but the election of 1860 was the most responsible of starting the civil war. I believe the election of 1860 started the civil war because it starts with a debate to start a war. Also people like the south didn’t like the election which leads to more emotion which also means violent people. If the election of 1860 was the start of the south being emotional, that means they will gain more emotion and will be more violent. The election of 1860 was about Abraham Lincoln being president in Washington D.C and other people such as Stephen Douglas, John Bell, and John Breckinridge. Abraham Lincoln was a republican, Stephen Douglas was Northern democrat, John Breckinridge was a Southern democrat, and John Bell was from the constitutional Union party. Southern states threaten to secede because they feared the Union would abolish slavery, which meant no more slaves for the South. In the North it was Abraham Lincoln vs. Stephen Douglas and in the South was John Bell vs. John Breckinridge. The winner was Abraham Lincoln, in December 1860 South Carolina secedes from the Union then in February 1860 Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, Florida joined South Carolina in seceding the Union. The election of 1860 was the most responsible for the civil war and up to emotions which leads to violence. The reaction of...

Words: 422 - Pages: 2

Civil War

...Colleen Anderson The Civil War HIST 415 Essay One Why did the South Secede? At the beginning of the American Revolution in 1775 all of the colonies allowed slavery. Between Independence and 1820, all states in the North had either banned slavery and were choosing to base their economies on free labor instead. The Free states remained agricultural, but went through a process of industrialization, creating a diversified economy as they invested in cities, factories, and new forms of transportation. The South invested more in agriculture and was extremely reliant on slave labor for its cotton production. The economic, political and cultural life was shaped by a need to maintain slavery. The South was wealthy and its wealth was invested in land and slaves. (McPherson 77) They were worth a lot more than the land which they worked. The South had a society and an economy that revolved around the institution of slavery, and it was being threatened. Abolition was causing the South to bleed money by slaves escaping and the slaves were not being returned to their owners. In my opinion the John Brown raid was a strong factor that pushed the south to secede. Around the time of the Mexican War, both the Northerners and Southerners were concerned over whether or not the new territories should be free of slavery or not. This promoted the development of free soil, in which people mostly Northerners opposed the expansion of slavery into Western territories. The southerners opposed this new...

Words: 553 - Pages: 3

Civil War

...Memory and historiography Monument to the Grand Army of the Republic, a Union veteran organization Cherokee Confederates reunion in New Orleans, 1903The Civil War is one of the central events in America's collective memory. There are innumerable statues, commemorations, books and archival collections. The memory includes the home front, military affairs, the treatment of soldiers, both living and dead, in the war's aftermath, depictions of the war in literature and art, evaluations of heroes and villains, and considerations of the moral and political lessons of the war.[247] The last theme includes moral evaluations of racism and slavery, heroism in combat and behind the lines, and the issues of democracy and minority rights, as well as the notion of an "Empire of Liberty" influencing the world.[248] Memory of the war in the white South crystallized in the myth of the "Lost Cause", which shaped regional identity and race relations for generations.[249] 150th anniversary2011 marked the 150th anniversary of the beginning of the American Civil War. Many in the American South attempted to incorporate both black history and white perspectives. A Harris Poll given in March 2011 suggested that Americans were still uniquely divided over the results and appropriate memorials to acknowledge the occasion.[250] While traditionally American films of the Civil War feature "brother versus brother" themes[251] film treatments of the war are evolving to include African American...

Words: 710 - Pages: 3

Civil War

...Civil War Ranked as the deadliest war in American history, the Civil War tore America apart and took the lives of atleast 600,000 citizens. The war sparked mostly from the dispute over the rights of individual states. It lasted from 1861 until General Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia surrendered at Appomattox Court House on April 9, 1865. The American Civil War could have swung in either direction, but many factors suggested that Union Victory was inevitable.55 First off, the manpower on the Union side was much larger and outnumbered the Confederate army strength. There were 20 Northern states fighting against 11 Southern states. When the war broke out, the Confederate Army had an estimated 750,000 soldiers, whereas the Union Army had about 2 milliion soldiers. The Confederate soldiers had many odds against them. A Yankee stood a 1 in 18 chance of dying due to illness and a 1 in 8 chance of dying in battle. A Rebel faced a 1 in 5 chance of dying from disease and a 1 in 8 chance of dying in battle. Military officers such as P.G.T. Beauregard, Stonewall Jackson, and Robert E. Lee brought major victories for the Southern Army. Their military strategies were efficient and powerful, but then again, so were the actions of the Northern Army. Some of the best military officers on the Union side were Ulysses S. Grant, William T. Sherman and Winfield Scott. It is said that the Union Army had much better teamwork and respect towards their officers, when in fact the...

Words: 743 - Pages: 3

Civil War

...Week Eight - CheckPoint Civil War, Table and Response Due Date: Day 5, Assignments Link Points Possible: 20 Points Earned: XX ------------------------------------------------- Part One: Table, Union and Confederate Home Fronts Points Possible: 10 Points Earned: XX Fill in the following table with experiences on the Union home front and experiences on the Confederate home front. Civil War Home Fronts | DifferencesBetween North and South Home Fronts | 1. The Union and the Confederates were very different in the way they conducted business.2. The Union they made industrialization development, infrastructure grew, and urban cities and towns grew.3. The Confederate had large plantations and made their slaves work long and hard on their farms. They grew cotton and tobacco on these plantations.4. The Union was able to pass laws to tax on imported goods so that the Confederates would have to buy from them.5. The confederates wanted stronger state rights and a weaker central government; the Union wanted the government to have more power. | Similarities Between North and South Home Fronts | 1. Both the Union and confederates Struggled, economically, politically, and culturally to agree with one another.2. Union and confederate home fronts faced hardship during the war, from diseases, bad medical care, lack of food, corruption of morality, and rising numbers of deaths.3. Woman of both the union and confederacy found new opportunities to work outside the home...

Words: 520 - Pages: 3

Civil War

...The Civil War was by far the most significant war that America had seen thus far. This war was the separation of our so far ‘United Country’, and had it gone the other way, who knows how our society would be like today. The fact is, the South was at a disadvantage right from the get-go, before the war even started. From then on, the south was hurt not only economically at the beginning of the war, but also with man power and many other complications to come. One being that most of the population living in the South at that time was made up of slaves. They were also far behind the North with industry, technology and transporting goods which was a huge setback because the North controlled goods coming from England and other countries. When Abraham Lincoln became president, he and the Republican Party had a long list of things they wanted to accomplish right away, which included the Homestead Act, and Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation. The ongoing bickering and intense hatred between the North and South before the civil war was so distinct that you could cut the tension with a knife. In 1820, forty years before the Civil war, it was the beginning of a monster to come. As the country rapidly moved west into new territories, there had to be a decision made. Were the new territories going to be slave states or Free states? This argument was what fueled the fire for forty years to come. The Missouri Compromise was thought to be the ultimate fix to the slave issue. Any state...

Words: 1686 - Pages: 7

Civil War

...Decisions can be difficult that they cause war, division of one’s family, and arguing. The civil war started because of a disagreement. Something as little as bringing the first slave to America caused a war. The north and south argued and disagreed. They made the choice to start a war. Border states played a huge part in the war. There were few border states. They were Kentucky, Maryland, Delaware, and Missouri. They all had choices in the part they would play in the war. Even though those states weren’t many, they had dire choices that would effect the outcome of the war. These choices could make or break the nation. Lincoln understood this. He knew it would make a difference who these border states chose. The border states had a huge decision it would effect the outcome of a war. The states had hard choices. Delaware quickly decided to stay with the Union. It must have been an easy decision because it was quick. Maryland didn’t have much of a choice. It was a easy decision because Union troops would have attacked Maryland if it decided to be Southern. So it became northern. Kentucky was a vital ingredient to the war. Abraham Lincoln was born in Kentucky. That could have made them favor him. Kentucky took time deciding what side to be on. The North didn’t push but when Confederate forces marched straight through Kentucky the decision was made. The Union! Missouri was also important. General John Charles Fremont was ordered by Abe Lincoln to secure Missouri for the...

Words: 400 - Pages: 2

Civil War

...HIST101 - Instructor- Wonda Sikes 7/27/14 U.S History to 1877 The Civil War By: Anthony Green I chose to do a picture of the American Civil War. The picture I chose is of a battle between the union and the confederacy or north and south. The picture shows how severe the war truly was between the two sides. The north is running up a hill while the south is running down. Both sides have guns and swords drawn, and gun smoke everywhere, people dying on both sides. Horses getting shot, flags waving, and everybody seems to be yelling and screaming. Cannons getting shot looks like it might rain, I feel that it depict a deep time of depression, truth, but most of all anger, anger for the south to take control of the north, and anger for the north to take control of the south. In 1860 Abraham Lincoln ran for president. The republicans lead by Lincoln opposed to the expansion of slavery into the United States during the presidential election. Lincoln won the election, and then on march4th 1861 he was officially inaugurated. But before his inauguration seven of the cotton based slave states formed the confederacy. The first six to secede had the greatest number of slaves in their community, almost fifty percent for the six states. The outgoing democrats and the incoming republicans rejected secession as illegal. At Abraham Lincoln’s...

Words: 840 - Pages: 4

Civil War

...A Civil War The Civil War was arguably the darkest moment in the history of America. For the first time brother fought brother and The Union had to fight to stay whole. Southern states believed in their right to own slaves and though Lincoln formally addressed that he would not interfere with that right, the southern population believed that Lincoln’s election would be, “the greatest evil that has ever befallen this country.” This wedge driven squarely at the Mason-Dixon line tore the United States in two, one half believing in slavery while the other half strongly opposing it. The social tensions between the north and the south began with the election of 1860. The south favored J. C. Breckenridge, while the north favored Abraham Lincoln. Anyone who knows anything about history knows that Lincoln won the 1860 election and became our 16th president. This enraged the south due to Lincoln’s view that slavery should not spread to the un-unionised territories, and so South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas seceded from the union shortly after the election. This created a huge communal deviation, as former kinsmen, now turned foe, were locked in combat - The Union of the north and the Confederacy of the south. At the start of the war, no African Americans were allowed to fight for either side. A law passed in 1862, however, allowed them to fight for northern states, though after the war a larger scale enlistment process was implemented...

Words: 1660 - Pages: 7

Civil War

...Channel Encarnacion HIST 102 10/27/14 Civil War Debate Was the Civil War Inevitable? Was the Civil War Avoidable? In The Irrepressible Conflict by Kenneth M. Stampp he does not argue that the Civil War was inevitable. He does observe, however, that it is hard to see how the country could have avoided some sort of showdown on slavery. Conflict was “irrepressible” in the sense that “the issues dividing the North and South were genuine and substantial and that conflict between them was a natural and logical result.” The civil war was inevitable given the circumstances under which it came. The three main causes: infringement on civil liberties, violation on states' rights, and the collapse of the two-party system made the conflict between North and South almost impossible to resolve. The war was going to happen one way or another. The south originally disagreed with Lincoln’s laws. The North and the South had very diverse views over slavery. The country couldn’t have been integrated if they didn’t come to a compromise. With the north wanting a strong federal government and the south with the contrary wants, the country couldn’t have agreed to go one way or the other. The war had to happen in order for a winner to take control and make the executive decisions. The country would have been splitting with every new state union, leaving the country with a very dissimilar outcome than what is today. The explosion of the American Civil War was caused by a vast number of...

Words: 667 - Pages: 3

Civil War

...Civil War Internal civil conflict has been common- place throughout the past time period, a undeniable fact that, till recently, avoid the notice of most economists. Civil wars, or those internal conflicts that count over 1,000 battle deaths in an exceedingly single year, have afflicted a 3rd of all nations. Enumeration civil conflicts, or those that count a minimum of twenty-five battle deaths once a year, will increase the incidence to over.(Koonings and Krujit 1999) If several post-1945 civil wars are “ethnic” or “nationalist” as these terms are sometimes understood, then even more are fought as insurgencies. Insurgency may be a technology of military conflict characterized by little, gently armed bands active guerrilla warfare from rural base areas. We have a tendency to shall argue that to elucidate why some countries and teams have older civil wars during this amount, one got to perceive the conditions that favor uprising, that are to a significant extent freelance of cultural differences between teams and even cluster grievances. These conditions are best summarized by means of a quick statement of the logic of uprising.(McPherson 2003) The most necessary battle in warfare is that the battle of Fort Sumter. Fort Sumter was placed within the middle of the harbor of Charleston, South geographic area, wherever the U.S. fort's garrison had withdrawn to avoid incidents with native militias within the streets of the town. in contrast to President, UN agency allowed...

Words: 391 - Pages: 2

Civil War

... The Civil War, is the most brutal war in US history. It took place in 1861, when the South initiated hostilities against the North. But why? Before shots were fired, the North and South were engaging in arguments over policy and values. The South and North knew that this war was coming, and here are some examples of why the war started.    Dred Scott v. Sandford was a Supreme Court ruling in 1857 that denied the request of citizenship for Mr. Scott, stating that “no person with African blood could become a U.S. citizen” that outraged the North. The court voted 7 no, 2 yes and added that all black people were property, and Congress had no ability to abolish slavery. President Buchanan abstained and refer to the Supreme Court decision. The South was pleased with the verdict. In the scale of this incident will grade as deep and consequential. The Abolitionist Act of 1830s is the law that the North tried to enact upon the United States, this law attempted to abolish slavery immediately. The North supported the Act by enforcing freedom to slaves in the northern states and rebelling against it. The South reacted negatively and requested immediate action from the North, to stop the pro abolishment actions. The North ignored the request. On a scale from shallow to deep this was in the middle.     The Fugitive Slave Act was an act in 1793 stating that you must return all runaway slaves. If you did not return the slaves you were fined or prosecuted. People of the North were...

Words: 727 - Pages: 3

Civil War

...Captain America: Civil War Submitted to: Ms. Abigail Deabanico Submitted by: Jan Michael Eli SM. Bautista (1 Microbiology) Submitted On: May 2, 2016 Captain America: Civil War (April 2016) Following the events of the previous film in the Marvel Franchise, Avengers: Age of Ultron, Captain America: Civil War was released in April 27, 2016. The film’s events come directly after what happened in the second avengers movie: the Avengers has lost the faith of the public due to their otherwise ‘heroic’ actions that consequently puts the lives of the innocent in jeopardy. Another factor that instigates this is the mission Steve Rogers or Captain America (Chris Evans), Sam Wilson (Anthonie Mackie), Romanoff (Scarlett Johansson), and Wanda (Elizabeth Olsen) in Lagos, Nigeria. They were trying to stop the then-turncoat security official, Crossbones (Frank Grillo), from obtaining a biological weapon. In the fight, he planned on committing suicide, in order to take down Captain America with him. However, Wanda notices this and decides to contain the explosion (and Crossbones) within a container formed from her psyche powers and sends it upward, detonating it. Unfortunately, she sends it near a commercial building, and the explosion kills innocents. Following this disaster, the United Nations decided to make the Sokovia Accords, where in the Avengers will be placed under a governing body. This divides the Avengers, with one side supporting the Sokovia Accord with Tony Stark...

Words: 1181 - Pages: 5

Civil War

...The Civil War More Americans died during the Civil War from 1861-1865 than in any other war, ever. While these dates may define the period of war action, in fact the Civil War was the result of a long, history of complex issues of such things as Constitutional interpretation, economics, and the ethics of slavery. Below are brief sketches of only a few of the memorable names from that era of U.S. history. Also online at the Smithsonian is a collection of Civil War photographs by Mathew Brady. Henry Clay (1777-1852) George Peter Alexander Healy (1813-1894) Oil on canvas, circa 1845, NPG.65.44 National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Transfer from the National Gallery of Art; gift of Andew W. Mellon, 1942 Henry Clay was one of the most influential congressmen of the early 1800s, with a political career that spanned nearly fifty years. Born in the midst of the American Revolution, he devoted his professional energy to the preservation of the union of the states in the stormy years preceding the Civil War. To that end, he crafted several key compromises between the North and the South, for which he became known as "The Great Pacificator." But even his legendary statesmanship could not keep war from erupting nine years after his death. Differing interpretations of the Constitution were at the heart of the Civil War. Clay and other supporters of the Union insisted that states were subject to federal authority, while others, most...

Words: 1639 - Pages: 7