Aishwarya L Natarajan
Rhet: 1030:0090
Hojing Song 09/29/2014

Fa(S) t Food & F(A)st Citizens
Comparing two articles is not an easy job it is like having two plates on the table in front of you. One filled with Hot-Fudge and the other filled with Garden Salad. Well, it is obvious, that our taste buds would crave for the Hot-Fudge and not for the salad. “Smart Choices” eat healthy and stay healthy, sounds right, but not all the time. In the same way, an essay may sound just right until we analyze it rhetorically. An essay, constructed with equal and right amounts of Ethos. Pathos and Logos would be the one under the limelight, which in this case is “Remarks to the NACCP” by Michelle Obama, over “Unhappy …show more content…
The way their works are constructed, is so convincing that at one point I could not judge me in which direction am I going. Though they both are highly creditable and put forth their arguments from their stand point, both logically and practically Michelle Obama sounds more loud and reasonable. It is not because that Michael’s plan is impossible or that he is not that honorable like First Lady, but because She is concentrating more on constructing a better and a healthier future to like in, rather than restricting herself by just focusing on just a local community or the past facts. “Scientific reductionism is an undeniably powerful tool, but it can mislead us too, especially when applied to something as complex as, on the one side, a food, and on the other, a human eater”. (Pollan, Michael. "Unhappy Meals." The New York Times Magazine 28 Jan. 2007: 6.