Free Essay

Peasant Revolt

In:

Submitted By tanu23
Words 3145
Pages 13
Peasant struggles in British India
Can be classified into following groups: Before 1857’s Mutiny | * East India: Sanyasi Revolt, Chuar and Ho Rising, Kol Rising, Santhal Rising, Pagal Panthis and Faraizis Revolt * West India: Bhil, Ramosis * South India: Poligars | After 1857’s Mutiny | * Indigo Movement (1859-60) * Pabna Agrarian Unrest (1873-76), * Deccan riots (1874-75), * No-Revenue Movement Assam, Maharashtra, and Punjab: (towards the end of 19th century) * Champaran Indigo Satyagraha (1917) | In the 20s and 30s | 2nd Moplah, Awadh Kisan Sabha, Eka movement, Bardoli etc. | During and After WW2 | * Congress Ministries in provinces such as Bihar, UP and Bombay (will be discussed separately in third article) * Faizpur Congress session (1936) * All India Kisan Congress * Tebhaga Movement in Bengal * Telangana Outbreak in Hyderabad * Varlis Revolt in Western Indi |

Peasant Revolts before 1857
Sanyasi Revolt, 1772 * British government restricted people from visiting holy places. Sansyasi got angry * Joined by farmers, evicted landlords, disbanded soldiers * Focal point: Rangpur to Dhaka * Leader: Manju Shah Fakir * Sanyasis defeated a company of sepoys and killed the commander. They overran some districts, virtually running a parallel government. * This rebellion continued till the end of the 18th century. * Governor General Warren Hastings launched a military campaign against Sansyasis. * From 1800, sanyasis probably joined the Marathas to fight British.
Pagal Panthi, 1830s-40s * Reason: Zamindari Oppression * Area: North Bengal, Hajong and Garo tribes. * Leader: Karam Shah and his son Tipu * Result: Initially British agreed to Pagal Panthi demand, made arrangement to protect the cultivators from Zamindar * But later, launched massive military operation to suppress Pagal Panthis
Santhal, 1855 * Reason: oppression of police, atrocities of landlords and moneylenders, ill-treatment of small farmers by land revenue officials. Government banned shifting cultivation in forest areas. * Area: Raj Mahal hills * Leaders: Sindhu + Kanhu * Result: The government could pacified these Santhals by creating a separate district of Santhal Parganas. some other revolts before 1857’s Mutiny: Bhil1817 to 1819 | * Reason: agrarian hardship * Area: W.Ghats, Khandesh | Chuar and Ho1820 to 1837. | * Reason: famine, land Revenue * Area: Midnapur, Chhotanagpur, Singhbhum * Tribes involved * Chuar=Midnapur * Ho and Munda= Chhota Nagpur and Singhbhum | Faraizis1838 to 1857 | * Reason: Zamindari Oppression * Area: East Bengal * Leader: Faraizis were followers of a Muslim sect founded by Haji Shariatullah of Faridpur | Kherwar/Sapha Har | * Against revenue settlements in tribal areas. | Kol | * Reason: British transferred of land from Kol headmen (Mundas) to outsiders like Sikh and Muslim farmers. * Area: Chhota Nagpur, Ranchi, Singhbhum, Hazaribag, Palamau and western parts of Manbhum. | Mophah, First uprising1836-1854 | * Malabar. * by Muslim tenants against Hindu Zamindars (Jemnis). | Poligars | * Reason: land Revenue * Area: Dindigul, Malabar, Arcot, Madras presidency | Tiru Mir1782-1831 | * Bengal. Against Hindu land lords, who imposed beard tax on Farazis. |
Revolts after 1857’s Mutiny

General features: 1. After 1857’s revolt, The British had crushed down native princes and zamindars. Hence farmers themselves became main force of agitations. 2. Target= sometimes government, sometimes moneylender, sometimes landlord/ zamindar 3. Territorial reach. not organized on mass-scale 4. Often spontaneous. no coordination 5. lacked continuity or long term struggle. 6. never threatened British supremacy 7. farmers didn’t mind paying rent, revenue, interest on debt but only agitated when they were raised to an abnormal level. 8. lacked understanding of colonial economic system or divide and rule policy of the British. Farmers’ agitations were based within framework of old social order, hence often failed because government could woo a faction by granting them concession and hence movement would collapse.
Indigo Movement (1859-60) * European planters forced desi farmers to grow the indigo in Eastern India, without paying right price. * If any farmer refused- and started growing rice, he was kidnapped, women and children were attacked, and crop was looted, burnt and destroyed. * If farmer approached court, the European judge would rule in favour of the European planter. * The privileges and immunities enjoyed by the British planters placed them above the law and beyond all judicial control. * Finally Indigo peasants launched revolt in Nadia district of Bengal presidency. Refused to grow Indigo. If police tried to intervene, they were attacked. * European Planters responded by increasing the rent and evicting farmers. Led to more agitations and confrontations. * Later got support from the intelligentsia, press, missionaries and Muslims. * Result: Government issued a notification that the Indian farmers cannot be compelled to grow indigo and that it would ensure that all disputes were settled by legal means. By the end of 1860, Indigo planters should down their factories and cultivation of indigo was virtually wiped out from Bengal. Harish Chandra Mukherji | editor of Hindu patriot. published reports on indigo campaign, organized mass meetings etc. | Din Bandhu Mitra | wrote a play ‘Neel Darpan’ to portray the oppression of indigo farmers. |
Pabna Agrarian Unrest (1873-76) * Area: East Bengal. Pabna=a jute growing district * Reason: Zamindars enhanced rents beyond legal limits through a variety of cesses (Abwab), Farmers had to face costly legal affairs and forced eviction. Nuisance of moneylenders. * Leaders: Ishwar Chandra Roy, Shambhu Pal, Khoodi Mollah.
Notable features * Agrarian league formed to fight legal battle against the zamindars and organized nonpayment of rent campaign. * This league provided a sound platform to the peasants at a time when there was no kisan sabha or any political party to organize the peasants. * by and large non-violent. No zamindar or agent was killed / seriously injured. Very few houses looted, very few police stations attacked. * Hindu Muslim unity, despite the fact that most Zamindars were Hindu and farmers were muslims. * farmers demanded to become ryots of British queen and not of Zamindars. * Got support from Intellectuals: Bankim Chandra Chettarji, RC Dutt, Surendranath Benerjee etc.
Result:
* This unrest resulted into Bengal Tenancy Act of 1885. * But this act did not fully protect farmers from the zamindari oppression * Even non-cultivators were given occupancy right. It gave rise to a powerful jotedar groups. * Later some of the Jotedars became as exploitative as the zamindars.
Deccan Riots (1874-75)
Area: In the ryotwari areas of Pune and Ahmadnagar of Maharashtra
Reasons
* the land revenue was very high * had to pay land Revenue even during bad seasons * 1860: American civil war=boom in demand of cotton export. * But In 1864, war ends=>cotton export declines, yet government raised land revenue. * Farmers had taken loans from moneylenders, but now they cannot repay=>Moneylenders took away their land, cattle, jewelry and property.
Notable features: 1. The object of this riot was to destroy the dead bonds, decrees, etc. in possession of their creditors. 2. Violence was used only when the moneylenders refused to hand over the documents. 3. villagers led by traditional headmen (Patels) 4. Involved social boycott of moneylender. and social boycott of any villager who didn’t socially boycott the moneylender. 5. Later got support from Poona Sarvajanik Sabha led by Justice Ranade.
Result:
1. Initially government resorted to use of police force and arrest. but later appointed a commission, passed Agriculturists Relief Act in 1879 and on the operation of Civil Procedure Code. 2. Now the peasants could not be arrested and sent to jail if they failed to pay their debts.
Ramosi, 1877-87 * Reason: Ramosis of Maharashtra were the inferior ranks of police in Maratha administration. * After the fall of the Maratha kingdom, they became farmers =>heavy land Revenue demands by British. * Area: Satara, Maharashtra, Deccan * Leader: Chittur Singh (1822), Vasudev Balwant Phadke (1877-87) * Result: Government gave them land grants and recruited them as hill police.
No-Revenue Movements (1893-1900)
In the Ryotwari areas. Main reason: hike in land revenue. Assam | * British increase land Revenue by 50 to 70 per cent in Kamrup and Darrang districts. * Villager decided not to pay Revenue. And socially boycotted any farmer who paid land Revenue. * Rural elites, Brahmin led the revolt. Social boycott of anyone who paid taxes to British. | Bombay | * farmers wanted revenue remission under famine code during 1896-1900. * Tilak, Poona Sarvajanik Sabha sent volunteers to spread awareness among farmers about their legal rights under Famine code. * These campaigns spread to Surat, Nasik, Khera and Ahmedabad. | Punjab | * Nuisance of moneylenders. * led to assault and murder of moneylenders by the peasants. * Result: Punjab Land Alienation Act of 1902 which prohibited for 20 years transfer of land from peasants to moneylenders and mortgage. |
Birsa Munda’s Ulgulan (1899)
South of Ranchi
Reasons
* Tribals practiced Khuntkatti system (joint holding by tribal lineages) * But rich farmers, merchants, moneylenders, dikus, thekedars from Northern India came and tried to replace it with typical Zamindari-tenancy system. * These new landlords caused indebtedness and beth-begari (forced labour) among the tribal. * Birsa Munda organized the Munda tribals, attacked churches and police stations.
Result:
* Birsa died in jail, while others shot dead, hanged or deported. * Government enacted Chotanagpur Tenancy Act 1908. * recognized Khuntkatti rights * banned eth Begari (forced labour)
Rajasthan: 1913-17 * Bijolia Movement and No tax campaign against Udipur Maharana * reason: The jagirdar levied 86 different cesses on farmers. * leaders: Sitaram Das, Vijay Singh Pathik (Bhoop Singh), Manik lal Verma * Farmers refused to pay taxes, migrated to neighboring states * 1922: Bhil movement against begari (forced labour)
Champaran Indigo Satyagraha (1917)
Area: Champaran district of Bihar. Ramnagar, Bettiah, Madhuban. * European planters forced Indian farmers to cultivate indigo on 3/20th of their land holding. Popularly known as tinkathia system. * Under this system, European planters holding thikadari leases from the big local zamindars forced the peasants to cultivate indigo on part of their land at un-remunerative prices and by charging sharahbeshi (rent enhancement) or tawan (lump sum compensation) * if the farmer did not want to grow indigo, he had to pay heavy fines 1916 | A farmer Raj Kumar Shukla contacted Gandhi during Congress Session @Lucknow. | 1917 | Mahatma Gandhi launched an agitation. Demanded a detailed enquiry and redressal of farmers’ grievances. |
Result:
1. Government appoints a committee, even included Gandhi as one of the member. 2. Government abolishes tinkhatia system and pays compensation to the farmers. 3. Gandhi gets new allies: Rajendra Prasad, JB Kriplani, Mahadev Desai and Braj Kishore Prasad
Kheda Satyagraha (1918) * Severe drought in Khera District, Gujarat * Kanbi-Patidar farmers. Making decent living through cotton, tobacco and dairy. But Plague and famine during 1898-1906 reduced their income. Yet government increased Revenue demand. * Prices of essential commodities: kerosene, salt etc increased because of WW1. * Farmers requested government to waive the land Revenue. Government ignored. * Gandhi + Sardar Patel launched “no-revenue” campaign
Result:
1. Government reduced revenue to 6.03% 2. Government ordered officials to recover Revenue only from those farmers who were willing to pay. 3. Gandhi gets new ally: Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
Peasant revolts in the 20s

General features 1. Often turned violent/ militant. Created a divide between local leaders and Nationalist Leaders/Congress/Gandhi 2. Sign of fear among middle-class leadership that movement would turn militant. 3. Government used full police force and suppression. 4. Farmers didn’t demand abolition of rent, zamindari. They only wanted a fair system of land tenancy.
Kisan Movement, UP (1920s)
Awadh farmers were suffering because: 1. Lack of occupancy rights on land in many regions. 2. Exaction by landlords of tributes, cesses, gifts, forced labour and excessive rent. 3. Periodic revision of land revenue in ryotwari areas. 4. Heavy indebtedness to the village land lords or money lenders. 5. World war I = steep rise in the price of food grains benefiting middlemen and merchants at the cost of the poor. 6. Farmers had to pay Larai Chanda (War contribution) during WW1. 7. To counter Gandhi/Congress’s influence, the Government wanted to win over Talukdars in Avadh. Hence, they gave free hand to Taulkdars regarding rent collection, eviction etc. 8. As a result, Begari (forced labour) and Bedakhli (evicting tenant for land) became a common sight. 9. +caste domination: “Jajmani system” under which, lower caste were oblighted to supply ghee, cloths etc free/@discounted prices to upper caste. 1918 | UP Kisan Sabha setup.by Home Rule leaders Gauri Shanker Mishra and Indra Narain Dwivedi with the support of Madan Mohan Malviya. | 1920 | Baba Ramchandra organized peasants of Awadh against the landlords, using Ramayana and caste sloghans. |
Methods of Awadh Kisan Sabha 1. asked farmers to stop working on bedakhli land (i.e. from where earlier farmer was evicted) 2. asked farmers to stop giving Begari and Jajmani. 3. Social boycott of farmers who did not obey 1+2. 4. By 1921, this movement turned militant and spread to districts of Eastern UP. involved looting, ransacking, attacking zamindar properties. 5. agitators raided the houses of landlords and moneylenders, looted bazaars and granaries
Result: Government amended Awadh Rent Act in 1921 and AKS ceased violence.
Later All India Kisan Sabha emerged. Discussed separately in third article along with Congress Provincial government .
Eka Movement (1920s) * Eka=unity movement * Initially by Congress+Khilafat Leaders. Later Madari Pasi and other low caste leaders. * Reason: oppression by Thekedar. High rents * Involved religious ritual, in which farmer would take a tip in Ganges and vow not to do begari, resist eviction etc. * Even included some small zamindars who were unhapped with British demands for high revenue. * By 1922 severe repression by government=Eka Movement vanished.
Second Moplah Uprising (1921)
Reasons:
1. Hindu Zamindars (Jemnis) exploiting Muslim Moplah/Mappila farmers in Malabar (Kerala) 2. rumors that British military strength had declined post WW1. 3. Khilafat movement and general hatred towards British. * Tipping point: Police raided a mosque to arrest a Khilafat leader Ali Musaliar. * Farmers attacked police stations, public offices and houses, land records of zamindars and moneylenders under the leadership of Kunhammed Haji. * For months, British government lost control over Ernad and Walluvanad taluks for several months. * This movement was termed as Anti-British, Anti-Zamindars and, to some extent, as anti-Hindu. * Podanur Blackhole: British put 66 Moplah prisoners into a railway wagon and completely shut it down. They all died of asphyxiation. * Result: Hundreds of Moplah lost lives- as a result they were completely demoralized and didn’t join in any future freedom struggles or even communist movements post independence.
Bardoli Satyagraha (1928) * Area: Bardoli, Gujarat * Reason: land Revenue increased by 22%. * Sardar Patel persuaded the farmers: * not to pay Revenue, required them to take oath in the name of their respective Hindu/Muslim gods. * social boycott of anyone who paid revenue. * Resist eviction and Jabti (Confiscation). Lock houses and migrate to Baroda State * social upliftment of Kaliparaj caste- who worked as landless laborers. * KM Munshi resigned from Bombay Legislative council. * Bombay communists and railway workers also threatened strikes and boycotts.
Result:
* Government setup Maxwell-Broomfield commission. * Reduced land Revenue to 6.03% * Returned confiscated land back to farmers. * Vallabhbhai got the title of “Sardar”.
Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) 1930-31 * In UP, Congress asked Zamindars not to pay revenue to Government. (no-revenue) * And asked Farmers not to pay rent to Zamindars. (no rent) * But Zamindars remained loyal to British =>as a result only farmers participated in no-rent movement.
Misc. Peasant Movements in the 1920 and 30s * Great Depression started in USA, spread in Europe=> agricultural prices crashed. * But Revenue, rents and taxes remained high, impoverishing the peasants. * farmers emboldened by Success of Bardoli Satyagraha of 1928 * Many Zamindar leaders stood up in 1937’s provincial elections on Congress tickets but they were defeated =farmers even more emboldened. Bakasht Movement | Bihar | Barhaiya Tal | Bihar. To restore Bakasht land. Leader: Karyananda Sharma | Bengal, Bihar | Refused to pay Chaukidari tax | Bihar | Kisan ran campaign to abolish Zamindari, restore Bakshat lands. Matter Solved when provincial congress government passed act.Bihar Provincial Kisan Sabha, 1929 | Bombay, Central Provinces | Against forest grazing regulations | Hajong Tribals | in Garo hills. to reduce rent from 50% to 25%. Leader Moni Singh. | Maharashtra, Karnataka, Bundelkhand | No-Revenue movement | Malabar, Kerala | against feudal levies, advance rents and eviction. Result: Malabar Tenancy act was amended. | Punjab | * Punjab Riyasati Praja Mandal (1928) * Against Maharaj of Patiala – he had increased land Revenue by 19% * farmers wanted him to abolish his land reserved for shikar (hunting) * for reduction of canal taxes. | Surat, Kheda | Farmers refused to pay Revenue. Migrated to Baroda State. |
Peasant Revolts in the 40s

General features: * During WW2, the peasant movements had declined. * But after the end of WW2 (1945)- peasant leaders anticipate freedom and new social order. Hence new movements with renewed vigour. * Earlier kisan movements usually didn’t demand abolition of Zamindari. They merely wanted a fair system of land revenue and land tenancy. But these new movements strongly demanded for abolition of Zamindari. * Even when they were unsuccessful, they created a climate which necessitated the post-independence land reforms and abolition of Zamindari. * Earlier movements were by and large non-violent. But now they turned militant e.g. Telangana movement in Hyderabad state and the Tebhaga movement in Bengal. Similarly All India Kisan Sabha openly preached militancy, violance against Zamindars.
Tebhaga, Bengal, 1946 1. in this region: Rich farmers (Jotedars) leased the farms to sharecroppers (Bargadar) 2. Flout Commission had recommended that Bargadar should get 2/3 of crop produce and jotedar (the landlord) should get 1/3rd of crop produce. 3. Tebhaga movement aimed to implement this recommendation through mass struggle. who | * Bengal Provincial Kisan Sabha * communist groups * lower stratum of tenants such as bargardars (share croppers), adhiars and poor peasants, tea plantation workers etc. | against whom | zamindars, rich farmers (Jotedars), moneylenders, traders, local bureaucrats |
Suharwardy’s Government introduced Bargardari Bill. But overall, Limited success: 1. Brutal police suppression. 2. difference of opinion * tribal elements wanted more militant protest * poor and middle level farmer support declined * urban professional did not support (Because many of them had given their village land to Bargadars) 3. Riots started in Calcutta, demand for partition.
Telangana, Hyderabad State (46-51) * Who? Farmers of Telengana and Madras, Praja Mandal org., Communist party. * Against whom? Nizam’s officials, landlords, moneylenders, traders * Biggest Peasant guerrilla war in Modern Indian history. * Reasons? 1. Under Asafjahi Nizam- bureaucratic domination by Muslim and Hindu elites 2. Vethi: forced labour and payments in kind by Jagirdar. Tribals were turned into debt slaves. 3. high rents, forced eviction and other forms of badass thuggary associated in a feudal area.
Why guerrilla war? 1. Arms act was implemented in slack manner. Easy to buy country made guns. 2. Congress, Arya Samaj etc. did not want Nizam/Razakars to setup an independent Hyderabad country after independence. So they gave moral support, funding.
Result
1. revenue and rent records destroyed 2. bonded labour/vethi disappeared, decline in untouchability 3. Agricultural wages were increased. 4. Destroyed aristocracy/feudalism from Hyderabad. Paved way for formation of Andhra State and Vinoba’s Bhudan movement.
Why decline? * Operation Polo: In 1948, Indian government sent army to overthrow Nizam. * even after liberation of Hyderabad, the Communist had internal political difference. The class war turned into petty murdering of forest officials and moneylenders. As a result movement lost support.
Varli, Bombay Province * Varli=tribals in W.India. * Kisan Sabha supported them. Later under the influence of communists. * Against whom? forest-contractors, the moneylenders, the rich farmers, landlords, British bureaucracy

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The Peasant Revolt

...HIST 304 | The Peasant’s Revolt and The Decline of Serfdom | Why did the Peasants’ Revolt Occur? Did the insurgents hope to abolish serfdom? How and why did serfdom decline and eventually disappear in England, notwithstanding the failure of the 1381 uprising and other influences of lower class protest against social inequality and injustice? | Naomi Woods Student 297278812/22/2011 | The Peasants Revolt is one of the most well known revolts of Medieval England, the revolt began as a local revolt in Essex in May of 1381, but it soon spread throughout the South East of England affecting many smaller towns along the way and having the biggest impact on London when the people turned their grievances towards the young King Richard II. This revolt was not a planned revolt but rather a spontaneous revolt fuelled by numerous grievances and sparked by the poll tax Parliament had introduced to help pay for the war in France. Incidences in the villages of Fobbing and Brentwood in Essex are said to have triggered the uprising. On 30 May 1381 a tax collector attempted to collect the poll tax from the villagers of Fobbing, the villagers, lead by a local land owner refused to pay and he was forced to leave empty handed, later Robert Belknap (Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas) arrived to investigate and punish the offenders, On June 2 he was attacked in Brentwood. By this time the counties of Essex and Kent were in full revolt the peasants and artisans of Essex demanded...

Words: 3202 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Peasants Revolt of 1381

...The Peasants’ revolt of 1381 was an attempt to break away from a futile system of government and, a fight to stop the never ending injustice and oppression faced by the lower class on a daily basis. During their age of oppression the peasants faced ridiculous taxes and fees which made living more than unbearable , the lack of reforms promised by the king , and the use of god and religion to justify the choices of the church and government. This display of injustice ignited a flame in the hearts of lower class citizens for centuries to come and it would not go unnoticed as both time and people progressed. During the period of time in which the peasants’ revolt of 1381 occurred the Parliament of England levied high and ridiculous taxes on the middle and lower classes of the social pyramid. On top of that pyramid stood the “warrior” class which included royalty, nobles, and knights. These wealthy nobles were unaffected by the taxes hurting the less fortunate citizens because they were the ones establishing the taxes in the first place. A peasant farmer or “villein” was entirely subject to unfair dues which he had to pay to their lord or noble in exchange for a small piece of land. Most of the peasant’s crops were taken, they made no money, and they lived off of the miniscule amount of food left to them by their lord. Since the water at the time was unfit for drinking because of its unsanitary state, ale was the main drink available to the lower and middle classes. There was a tax...

Words: 1163 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

German Peasant Revolt Dbq

...German Peasant Revolt DBQ  The German peasants of the 1524-1526 revolts were caused by interpretations of Lutheran ideals, the peasants desires to break free from serfdom, and the general search for equality in the eyes of god. The response to the peasant revolts varied among the social, political, and religious affiliations, ranging from cruel condemnation to fervent support of their cause. The rebels organized swiftly and fought hard, this determination helped achieve social reform, which the most important German reformer, Martin Luther, was completely opposed to.  Though the revolts were blamed on Lutheran reforms (Doc 1), Luther himself vehemently refuted the dispute (Doc 7). He refers to the peasants as dogs and is generally cruel towards their cause. Though a religious reformer, his dependence on the German nobility would not allow him to support the peasants; therefore his point of view is one in support of quelling the rebellions. The peasants may not have had the support of their greatest religious inspiration but they still drew on his word in order to justify their fight. The peasants claim that because all men are equal under the eyes of god, they have just as much divine right as the nobles do (Doc 3). These religious drives were set out in the Articles of The Peasants of Memmingen and would be responded to by the nobles, thus connecting Docs 3 and 4.  The nobles would retort to the religious grounds of the peasants by ensuring them that their salvation was not...

Words: 799 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Serfdom Dbq Analysis

...In 1524 the peasants of central Germany rose up against the nobility in the name of Luther. By this time Luther had published his Ninety-Five Theses, breaking away from the Catholic Church and it’s authority. Much like Luther and the Church, the peasants didn’t like the noble authority rose up against the nobles. The nobles fought back with ruthless and crushing armies. There were many causes of the peasants revolt. The ideas of Martin Luther and the hatred toward nobles and serfdom were major parts of cause of the revolt. The removal of serfdom, the punishment of nobles involved, and their portrayal as devils were all responses to the peasants revolt. Martin Luther was one cause of the peasant revolt. Martin Luther himself was more of an...

Words: 942 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Essay on Human Resource Development

...material (goods) should be cheaper. The system of exploiting their labour also is an extra burden for the farmers.2 The process of proletarianisation of agricultural labourers has increased during the last few decades and they are more dependent on wage labour while losing the extraeconomic relations with their employers which govern the conditions of their work and life. Barrington Moore Jr. in his celebrated work Social Origins Dictatorship and Democracy; Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world questions the revolutionary potential of the Indian peasantry. He observes that the landed upper classes and the peasants played an important role in the bourgeois revolutions leading to capitalist societies in England and France, the abortive bourgeois revolutions leading to fascism in the Germany and Italy and the peasant revolutions, leading to communism in Russia and China. But peasant rebellions in pre-modern India were relatively rare and completely ineffective and where modernisation impoverished the peasants at least as Ghanshyam Shah. “Social Movements in India-A Review of Literature”, Sage Publications, New Delhi, 1990, p.32. 2 Siva Venkata...

Words: 11290 - Pages: 46

Premium Essay

Causes and Consequences of Emancipation Russia

...What were the most important causes and most important consequences of the emancipation of the Serfs? Serfdom, a system of virtual slavery tying the Russian peasants to their landlords, was abolished in 1861 under the imperial demand of Tsar Nicholas II. This change was put in place for many reasons, including military defeat in Crimea, the economy and political system, which all contributed to the backwardness of Russia as a nation, as they prohibited the introduction of other major reforms. In my view, the most important cause of emancipation was the state of the economy, because the nature of serfdom prevented the country from catching up with the west, and the most important consequence was that the military was able to dramatically improve. One major reason that serfdom was abolished was because of the poor economic situation and general backwardness of the nation. Due to the nature of serfdom the economy was prevented from evolving; the serfs weren’t paid, so there could be no market, there could be no interest, and enterprise was prevented. This left Russia far behind the west, and with a struggling and starving workforce; they starved since the increasing famines and noble taxations left them with no food reserves. To combat this, they wanted to modernise agriculture, industry and railways to increase Russia’s economic strength. However, with serfdom in place, this was impossible to implement because serfs didn’t have money to invest in increasing agricultural efficiency...

Words: 1743 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

English Lit

...The Age of Revolution i789-1848 E R I C HOBSBAWM FIRST VINTAGE BOOKS EDITION, AUGUST 1996 Copyright © 1962 by E. J. Hobsbawm All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by Vintage Books, a division of Random House, Inc., New York. Originally published in Great Britain in hardcover by Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, in 1962. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hobsbawm, E.J. (EricJ.), 1917The Age of Revolution, 1789-1898 / Eric Hobsbawm.—1st Vintage Books ed. p. cm. Originally published: London : Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1962. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 0-679-77253-7 1. Europe—History—1789-1900. 2. Industrial revolution. I. Title. D299.H6 1996 940.2'7—dc20 96-7765 CIP VINTAGE BOOKS A Division of Random House, Inc. New York Random House Web address: http://www.randomhouse.com/ Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 CHAPTER MAPS 1 T H E W O R L D IN T H E 1780s Le dix-huittime stick doit lire mis au Panlhion.—Saint-Just1 i Europe in 1789 page 309 2 Europe in 1810 310 3 Europe in 1840 311 4 World Population in Large Cities: 1800-1850 31a 5 Western Culture 1815-1848: Opera 314 6 The States of Europe in 1836 316 7 Workshop of the World 317 8 Industrialization of Europe: 1850 318 9 Spread of French Law 320 I T H E first thing to observe about the world...

Words: 21388 - Pages: 86

Free Essay

Year 1000

...Having the Faith to Survive The life of an English peasant around the year 1,000 proved to be quite laborious. Thanks to Sir Robert Cotton, authors Danziger and Lacey were able to tell us how the drawings of the Julius Work Calendar portrayed these individuals. The world was a quaint and quiet place in that time, with a total population of only one million people. “The year 1,000 was an empty world, with much more room to stretch out and breath.” There were three groups of citizens that were spread over the country side. These included workers, fighters and those that prayed for everyone. It seemed somewhat harmonious. The peasants worked for their Lords who took care of them. It was a mundane, but give and take society. “Life was short”. The expected life span was no more than fifty years. A boy of twelve was old enough to give allegiance to the King and a girl often married in her early teenage years. Through excavation, they have found their bones and surprisingly they did not differ much from us. They were the same height and their brains were the same size as ours. It seems to me that they were probably much stronger and smarter because everything had to be learned and preservation of sanity and health had to come from themselves. The Julius Work Calendar shows us that they were very much like us in that they lived by a schedule and got caught up in juggling time. It was a bit more structured for them though. They did not...

Words: 1056 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Geography Sba

...f study Methodology Location of study area Presentation and analysis of data Conclusion Bibliography AIM OF STUDY The aim of this study is to discover and describe problems faced by peasant farmers in the geographical area of Ewarton; St. Catherine. METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION On Tuesday, December 3, 2013, a field study was implemented in Ewarton in the parish of St.Catherine, Jamaica. The locations of study were scheduled to be Worthy Park Estate in Liuidas Vale and Farmer Roy’s Farm in Ewarton, St.Catherine. The weather was hot and very sunny thus there was no disturbance in this field study .The materials used to carry out the observation were: notebook, pen, pencils, camera, recording devices on phones and textbooks. A few of my friends also students participating in the field study formed a small group to gather primary information using questionnaires and interviews accordingly by conducting informal interviews and written questionnaires . Data was also collected through textbooks and the internet. Our first location was Worthy Park Estate .Worthy Park Estate is a sugar factory and distillery. It is surrounded by Cockpit Mountains and is 1200 ft. above sea level. It is a suitable place for study because it is cooler than most places although quite sunny during the daytime .The climate provides the best growing conditions for the growth of sugarcane it is also considered a commercial farm. Our second location was a subsistent farm owned by the...

Words: 272 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Geography Sba

...CXC GEOGRAPHY SCHOOL BASED ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014 NAME OF CANDIDATE: JUSTINE BROWN SCHOOL: HOLYCHILDHOOD HIGHSCHOOL TERRITORY: JAMAICA CENTER #: 100049 CANDIDATE #: TEACHER: MRS.DUN-GREENE TITLE: WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS FACED BY PEASANT FARMERS IN THE AREA EWARTON; ST.CATHERINE TABLE OF CONTENTS Aim of study Methodology Location of study area Presentation and analysis of data Conclusion Bibliography AIM OF STUDY The aim of this study is to discover and describe problems faced by peasant farmers in the geographical area of Ewarton; St. Catherine. METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION On Tuesday, December 3, 2013, a field study was implemented in Ewarton in the parish of St.Catherine, Jamaica. The locations of study were scheduled to be Worthy Park Estate in Liuidas Vale and Farmer Roy’s Farm in Ewarton, St.Catherine. The weather was hot and very sunny thus there was no disturbance in this field study .The materials used to carry out the observation were: notebook, pen, pencils, camera, recording devices on phones and textbooks. A few of my friends also students participating in the field study formed a small group to gather primary information using questionnaires and interviews accordingly by conducting informal interviews and written questionnaires . Data was also collected through textbooks and the internet.         Our first location was Worthy Park Estate .Worthy Park Estate is a sugar factory and distillery. It is surrounded by Cockpit Mountains...

Words: 341 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Lives of Peasants Changed to a Large Extent from 1855 to 1964?

...Arguably peasants working conditions did change however to a limited extent from 1855 to 1964. This was due to government reforms during tsarist Russia that had significant effects on peasants such as Stolypin and Alexander’s reforms as this was first steps taken to improve peasantry. However their freedom, transportation and the right to own land was very limited, redemption payments were almost impossible and they were still bound to the Mir. Similar to the communist era under Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev from 1917 peasant working conditions did change as Lenin introduced the new economic policy that improved peasant working conditions financially, but war communism did not benefit the peasants at all, agriculture was very low and caused a huge feminine what effected work life. When Stalin came to power 1924 there was huge transformation in peasant working conditions due to the industrialisation of Russia where machinery and agriculture increased however peasants were practically treated as slave labour during the five-year plans. Khrushchev also changed peasant-working lives as peasants became freer after Stalin’s death, for example they were paid more for grain and the removal of the MTS in 1958 allowed farmers to buy their own machinery. Overall change was very limited in peasant working conditions until 1950’s as the majority of the population were no longer peasants, machinery and new methods of faming became advanced and those who were peasants, they started to get paid...

Words: 2058 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Pamscad

...Structural Adjustment and SocialDisequilibrium in Ghana: AnAssessment ofPAMSCAD Programme as a PolicyResponse Tool Show full item record Title: Structural Adjustmentand Social Disequilibrium inGhana: An Assessment of PAMSCAD Programme as a Policy ResponseTool Author: Agyekum, Kwame Pius Abstract: Mostgovernments in Africa embarked upon structural adjustment programmes (SAP) in the mid 1980’s with the aim of stabilizingand improving their economies. Ghana’s adjustment started in 1983 with the view to halt and reverse the almost twodecades of stagnation and decay of the economy. SAPin Ghana made significant gainsat the macro economic levelinthe areasof: • export volumes (increased more than 10% from 1983); • inflation(dropped from 123% in1983 to 10.4% in 1983); • real per capita income (increased by 6.8% in1984); and • investment (increased more than two-and-half times). Despite the impressive macro-economic gainsat the national level,most vulnerablegroups were languishing inpoverty onthe ground. On realizing the socialdisequilibriumcreated by SAP and the predicament of the vulnerablegroups, the government instituted a Programme of Actionsof Mitigate the SocialCostsof Adjustment. (PAMSCAD) asa policy responsetoolto providequick reliefto the poor throughout the country PAMSCAD projects have been implemented in the country wellover eight years and the Secretariat which monitoredand coordinated activitiesfolded up inJune 1996. This research therefore was undertaken to assessthe...

Words: 573 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

To What Extent Had Russia Become More Stable by 1914?

...ministers and other evidence is arguable, for example the increase in population, this could be indicating a prosperous time in Russia and an increase in stability, or it could mean there was a lack of activities to be done, and the increased population meant there were more mouths to feed. There are many factors that contribute to how stable Russia was at this time. Economically, Russia seemed more unstable: eighty percent of the population were peasant farmers and the gap between the rich and poor was only increasing, making Russia even more unstable than it already was. Autocracy continued to repress the poor and the rich continued to hold most of the country’s finances. The poor struggled to become economically active, the rich fought to keep things the way they were during this time period. Stolypin tried to help the peasants by introducing land reforms – these meant that peasant’s owned the land and had more of an incentive to maintain and produce from it. However Stolypin was not supported in this and a lot of the peasants believed in the commune, they didn’t want privatisation for social and economic reasons. There was a massive pressure on the land and due to the fact that there was no unrest at this time indicates that the stability had increased, nonetheless there was huge land hunger due to the increased population – it had increased by twenty one percent between 1900 and 1910, adding approximately thirty million people to the population, this created a surplus of...

Words: 1136 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Thrustfore

...Stalin, he did not let his people take part in voting. Snowball, whose historical figure is Trotsky, gets banished for his ideas just like Trotsky did. Napoleon got rid of Snowball after an argument on whether a windmill should be built or not. When George Orwell linked Napoleon to Stalin’s violence through training puppies to be his soldiers, this further increases the impact it has on the victim than if Napoleon had chosen any other animal. Napoleon also blamed Snowball when there was no food, saying that he stole it all. Napoleon was using every chance he could to persuade the people to follow him and he was always making himself look good and hiding away the truth just like Stalin used to do. The Hens ---> Peasants The Hens in Animal Farm were like the peasants in Russia. They were very poor and were a burden on their leaders. They had no say in any rule making and were forced to do stuff. Like in Animal Farm, Napoleon told the Hens they must give up their precious...

Words: 577 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Serfs

...glory. Even so, the various classes perceived this momentous change for the peasants differently. The peasants thought the recent changes were not enough, and wanted more, while the upper class believed that the reforms were doing more damage than assistance, and each side proposed solutions that tried to compromise each opinion. 1st Paragraph: The peasants believed that the recent reforms in their favor were not enough, and wanted more. * Document 1 * Data shows how activities in Russia affected rebellions * During and after 1861 (when Alex II freed the serfs), the rebellions decrease * From 1891 (start of famines) to 1907 (which contained Russo-Japanese war and Bloody Sunday), rebellion drastically increases * Although serfs were emancipated and human bondage was abolished, the peasants wanted more and weren’t afraid to take action during hard times for Russia * Document 2 * Peasants communicating to Tsar Alex II * Blaming land owners for giving peasants the worst land, and standing by as the peasants starve * Beg the upper class to help, and they are fully capable to help (but are reluctant) * Desired change, stated what they needed (land from aristocracy, to help peasants from starvation) * Document 6 * Educated Socialist woman, Breshkovskaia, observes what peasants really want * Upper classes assumed that peasants would be content with land, food, and jobs but...

Words: 773 - Pages: 4