As you requested, I have finished my evaluation of Kyle Houston, who works as management consultants in Anders. I suggest that you have a second thought about promoting Kyle as the team leader in Dallas. My opinion is based on the observation of his performance during the three months' strategic planning with a division of RPG Financial Services. The ratings and evaluations collected from 15 team members, with whom Kyle worked during the last three months, support my observation. The ratings in the evaluation cover three aspects in Kyle’s performance in team works: contributing, listening, and the facilitating group problem solving. Kyle’s ability in team working is evaluated fairly according to these aspects.
Kyle has an open characteristic, which attributes to his high rating in contributing part of the evaluations with four of the rating score at three points.. Kyle is very enthusiastic and passion in his work. Many of the evaluations point out that Kyle is willing to provide his own opinions and never gets lazy on his jobs. In short, he is the most active, even aggressive member in the team. However, from my observation, he puts quantity before quality of his ideas. From the very beginning to the end of a meeting, he would raise his hand to express his own perspective every three minutes. He is very initiative and has a lot of ideas, but he expresses them so soon that some of the ideas seem to lack considerations. This behavior would lead to greater proportion of low quality ideas and result in wasting time of other members. Furthermore, his ideas are mostly from single perspective. He took much time thus sacrificed other team members’ opinions that need more consideration. From my observation, Kyle can work independently and be very efficient. But to work more closely with team members, Kyle would need greater spirit of cooperation.
From the rating in the team