In my experience thus far, it has been situations where the logical and moral evaluations diverge that have proven to be the most chal.. lenging ethical issues for me to resolve, and they will likely remain so. In trying to use a similar approach to tackling each of two very different dilemmas, I learned that I needed to develop more flexibility. In fact, the combination of these two experiences has led me to identify the key to this flexibility: effective evaluation comes from the interplay" rather than the choice, between logic and morality. While interning at a consulting firm that had recently made headlines for biased, unethical recommendations to clients, my boss asked me to change my fact-based analysis to arrive at a safer, more client-friendly conclusion. But my analysis was very clear; in this case there was a right answer and a wrong one, and he was advocating the wrong one. I let the facts drive my argument and reap' proached my boss. At the end of the day, I allowed the fact-based accuracy of my work to convince him to change his approach. In a different instance, I would rely on my morals to derive my answer. While between projects at McKinsey, I came upon a great opportunity. The clients were thoughtful and appreciative of consul, tants, the hours flexible, and the team top-notch, We were also hired to tackle a thoroughly interesting problem. The work, however, was for a tobacco company. After years of discouraging friends and loved ones to stop smoking, the task felt tantamount to asking me to