Free Essay

Personality Influence Negotiation

In: Business and Management

Submitted By juliacat11
Words 3165
Pages 13
Personality Style Considerations in Effective Negotiation James L. Patterson, Ph.D., C.P.M. Associate Professor of Management Western Illinois University – Quad Cities 3561-60th Street Moline, IL 61265-5881 U.S.A. I. Introduction Most buyers and supply managers have been trained in the processes and mechanics of commercial negotiation and have had a significant experience in applying the tools and techniques that they have been taught. However, most commercial negotiators (buyers and suppliers alike) have not been sufficiently trained to identify and take advantage of the innate personality characteristics and tendencies that all humans have. This session will provide insight as to how the different personality styles of negotiators can affect the outcomes and process of a negotiation. Several simple models are discussed that can be used to predict and identify the different personality traits and related negotiating styles for more effective negotiation preparation and execution. It has been estimated that, even though most of us understand the basics of negotiation, 80% of us do not actually like to negotiate. In addition, we often perceive that we are better negotiators than we actually are, i.e., we tend to overestimate our personal effectiveness in achieving our desired outcomes in any given negotiation. Our supplier counterparts usually receive more negotiation training than we do, so they are better prepared and are often more effective. II. Negotiation as an Interactive Process The three most important activities in any negotiation are preparation, preparation, and preparation. Understanding the psychological underpinnings of human personality tendencies can help a negotiator minimize the potential negative impact of escalating emotions encountered in a typical negotiation and losing sight of your desired goals and objectives. In other words, you will become better prepared by considering the psychological aspects of negotiators. Research shows that better prepared negotiators usually achieved more favorable outcomes. Negotiation has been defined as an interactive process during which all parties, having both common and conflicting interests, can propose and discuss specifics of a possible agreement that would make all parties better off than they would have been without such an agreement. In a negotiation, we all bring our personal psychological baggage to the table that sometimes clouds our ability to reason and evaluate information and proposals. Kare Anderson (1993) has published a book, Getting What You Want, which describes a simple model called “Triangle Talk.” Triangle Talk describes a three-pronged approach to any negotiation that helps the negotiator achieve his/her preferred outcomes. The first point is called “What You Want.” Here, the negotiator specifies in writing exactly what he/she wants to have achieved after the negotiation is completed. Your memory is faulty and selective, especially when you become emotionally attached to the issues or positions in a negotiation. Identifying and formalizing What You Want allows you to focus on what is important to you before the emotion and anxiety of a negotiation are encountered. By having specific, written goals, you can avoid being surprised at the negotiating table, making unnecessary concessions on the outcomes you deem important.

1

Figure 1 Triangle Talk
What You Want

The Negotiation Wha t They Wan Process Propose What They Can Accept

The second point of the Triangle Talk process involves applying the same principles as above except that they are applied to anticipating “What They Want.” One of the most dangerous assumptions in any negotiation is assuming that the other party thinks like you do. They don’t! You are trying to find out their “hot buttons” and other relevant information by using active listening techniques. Using openended questions is the preferred mode of seeking the underlying interests that are behind the stated positions. You need to play detective like Columbo here, asking questions to seek more information or clarify your assumptions. Nonverbal clues can also provide key information about what the other party really wants from a negotiated settlement. When analyzing nonverbal clues, the experienced negotiator looks for changes in behavior, voice, or body language, rather than trying to put meaning into them beforehand. It is usually the changes in behavior, voice, or body language, not the actual behavior itself, which signifies meaning. Another technique that works well is the strategic use of silence, much like the Japanese negotiator is famous for. Silence is usually uncomfortable, and the other party is likely to begin talking to fill the silent period, providing additional information that they may not have intended to divulge. The third point of Triangle Talk, “Propose What They Can Accept,” means working toward satisfying all parties’ needs as identified in the previous two steps. Others have described this as win-win negotiation where both parties work together to achieve both sets of desired outcomes from a negotiation. In other words, you are giving the other party a reason to say “Yes” to your proposals. By addressing the other party’s needs first, a negotiator is solving the other party’s “What’s in it for me?” question. Value, commitment, and attention are created for both parties. Skilled negotiators can demonstrate their commitment to the negotiation by reviewing earlier successes and agreements. Positioning your desired outcomes in terms that the other party can accept makes it easier for them to agree with you. III. Negotiator Personality Types In preparing for a negotiation, we need to understand the other party’s tendencies in a tense or pressure-filled situation, such as that encountered in a typical negotiation scenario. Negotiator personality types can be analyzed using two dimensions, emotion and assertiveness. Why is this important? The same negotiating approach may work differently with dissimilar people because of the innate differences related to our personality types. Figure 2 is a two-by-two matrix that outlines the different negotiating personality styles as defined by emotion and assertiveness. A negotiator with low emotion focuses on facts and organization, while a more emotional negotiator will be oriented more towards feelings and relationships. Less assertive negotiators tend to have longer attention spans and are slow to decide. Assertive negotiators are

2

characterized by short attention spans, making snap decisions, and the ability and willingness to take charge. Figure 2 Negotiator Personality Types
Lo Analytical Pragmatic

Amiable Emotion High Low

Extrovert High

Assertiveness

a. The Analytical Negotiator. The analytical negotiator is positioned low on the emotion axis and low on the assertiveness axis. This type could also be described as the “beaver.” The beaver, or analytical, can be recognized by several personal characteristics. In the old days, these negotiators carried multi-scaled slide rules; now, they tote personal digital assistants or laptop computers. They are also very slow to decide on any course of action because they demand a high level of accuracy, and, therefore, they need lots of information before they’re comfortable with making a decision. The analytical negotiator is typically immersed in the details of a negotiation and tends towards such occupations as engineering, finance, and accounting. In negotiating with a beaver, a negotiator must propose solutions and outcomes that answer the beaver’s question, “How has it been done before?” Beaver-style negotiators are thoughtful and highly objective, yet they tend to be overcautious. They are usually the most difficult type to get to decide because they never seem to have enough information. In addition, analytical negotiators are usually consistent and predictable. b. The Amiable Negotiator. The amiable negotiator is also known as the “golden retriever,” high on emotion and low on assertiveness. The golden retriever, or amiable, negotiating style is typically a traditionalist who is very interested in developing and maintaining relationships between the parties. They hate high-pressure tactics and avoid conflict situations whenever possible. This is the type of person who would turn himself or herself in to the F.B.I. if they accidentally removed a tag from a mattress. A golden retriever negotiator is oriented towards cultivating interpersonal relationships because he/she values loyalty, sensitivity, and patience. Occupation-wise, the amiable negotiator can be characterized as a “company-man” who is intensely loyal to the employer and takes personal offense to any negotiating tactic that would harm the organization and anyone associated with it. The negative side of a golden retriever includes the tendency to be impulsive and sentimental. Their credo is “Let’s keep things the way that they’ve always been.” c. The Extrovert Negotiator. The extrovert negotiator could be described as the “otter,” high on both assertiveness and emotion. The extrovert, or otter, is very friendly and open. However, if the negotiation requires detailed follow-up, the otter-type negotiator is unlikely to be able to do this

3

successfully. The theme of the extrovert might be “Trust me, it’ll work out!” However, the extrovert is enthusiastic, visionary, and has the ability to motivate others. Extroverts or otters gravitate towards jobs that require strong interpersonal influencing skills, such as sales, marketing, or public relations. They tend to value motivation and enthusiasm in both themselves and their coworkers. However, they are frequently considered too assertive or too impulsive as their assertiveness can quickly turn people off or create conflict. The otter is willing to say “No” if his or her needs are not adequately addressed. d. The Pragmatic Negotiator. A negotiator with a pragmatic personality is high on assertiveness but low on emotion. The animal associated with a pragmatic negotiator is the “lion.” The lion negotiator is very business-like and efficiency-oriented. All thoughts are focused on the bottom line. The pragmatic can be recognized by the use of organizers and formal behavior. Pragmatics, or lions, typically become senior managers or executives because of their ability to achieve results. The lion is a confident leader who is goal driven and results oriented. They are likely to have their calls screened because they don’t like to waste time with unimportant activities. Personally, they actively participate in sports and other activities where they can compete. The primary negatives of this personality type are that they are perceived by others to be out of touch with the rest of the world and that they operate under unrealistic time horizons. Dealing with Different Personality Types. Usually one personality type is predominant in a e. negotiator, although some negotiators display two dominant types. However, an effective negotiator recognizes the characteristics of each type and is able to role play and assume the necessary personality type appropriate for the conditions found in a given negotiation. In this model, opposite corner personality types frustrate each other because the very things that each type values is absent in the other party. For example, extrovert negotiators, or otters, frustrate analytical negotiators, or beavers, because the beaver wants to discuss details while the otter says not to sweat the details. Likewise, amiable negotiators, or golden retrievers, frustrate pragmatic negotiators, or lions, because the lion feels that the golden retriever is too “soft,” and the golden retriever is too stressed by the lion’s unwavering focus on the bottom line. Each personality type most prefers to negotiate with others of the same type because they value the same things. However, since personality types on the same axis share some similar traits, they can negotiate with each other with only minor frustrations based on personality type. For example, the following pairs of personality types fit into this category: analytical-pragmatic, pragmatic-extrovert, extrovert-amiable, and amiable-analytical. IV. Conflict Resolution Grid Another method for effective negotiators to use to analyze the psychological aspects of negotiation is a model called the Conflict Resolution Grid. Figure 3 outlines the various components of the Conflict Resolution Grid that is the result of widely accepted research conducted by Kenneth Thomas (1976).

4

Figure 3 Conflict Resolution Grid
High Compete Collaborate

Assertiveness

Compromise

Low

Avoid Lo

Accommodate High Cooperativeness

Here, behavior by the negotiator, when confronted by a conflict situation such as a negotiation, is analyzed on two dimensions, assertiveness and cooperativeness. Assertiveness is the motivation of a negotiator to achieve his/her own goals, objectives, and outcomes in a given negotiation, while cooperativeness is the negotiator’s willingness to allow or help the other party achieve its goals, objectives, and outcomes. Each of the five conflict resolution styles might be appropriate in a given negotiation based on the circumstances of the negotiation and the personalities of the participants. Avoiding Conflict Resolution Style. The avoiding style is low on both assertiveness and a. cooperativeness. In other words, this negotiator is not very cooperative in helping the other party to achieve its goals, but neither is he/she aggressively pursuing his/her own preferred outcomes in the negotiation. This approach is much like an ostrich that sticks its head in the sand and hopes that the conflict just goes away. The original problem, conflict, or situation is never directly addressed or resolved. However, avoiding behavior might be appropriate when the issue is trivial to you. It might also be an appropriate approach to use when there are no good solutions available to you or when a cooling off period is needed. It is not appropriate when the issue is important or when it is your ultimate responsibility for the outcome of the negotiation. It is also not relevant when the parties must come to an agreement because you do not become an active participant in the negotiation process. Because avoiding postpones addressing the problem, it is not appropriate when a prompt decision is necessary. b. Competing Conflict Resolution Style. A competing style of resolving conflict is also known as domination or win-lose negotiation. A negotiator using this style of high assertiveness and low cooperativeness will seek to reach his/her own preferred outcomes at the expense of the other party. Traditional negotiation research refers to this as a fixed sum pie where the benefits of the negotiation are limited and cannot be expanded. A competing behavior style can be appropriate when the outcome is trivial to the other party or when speed in decision-making is necessary. It can also be used to confront competitive or aggressive behavior on behalf of the other party. If the results of a poor decision are costly or otherwise important to you, then this style might be used effectively. However, if the issue is complex or if the two parties are relatively equal in power, then a competing style will not be effective. Also, if the other party is a skilled negotiator, then this style is inappropriate because he/she can easily see what you’re doing and counteract it.

5

c. Accommodating Conflict Resolution Style. The accommodating style of resolving conflict is sometimes known as obliging. This style is characterized by high cooperativeness and low assertiveness. A negotiator using this style will subjugate his/her own goals, objectives, and desired outcomes to allow the other party to achieve its goals, objectives, and outcomes in the negotiation. This behavior can be used to build or maintain a relationship now in exchange for future consideration. Accommodation is an appropriate style when the negotiator is not sure that his/her position is strong or when the issue is far more important to the other party than it is to you. If the long-term relationship is important to a negotiator, then it may be worthwhile to give up a few short-term concessions to gain even greater paybacks from the relationship in the future. However, this is not an appropriate behavior to use when you know you are right and when the other party is either wrong or unethical. If it is used in this instance, the unethical behavior of the other party is allowed to continue and will adversely influence future relations between the parties. Compromising Conflict Resolution Style. Intermediate levels of both assertiveness and d. cooperativeness characterize the compromise style of conflict resolution. Compromise can also be referred to as either bargaining or trading and generally produces less-than-optimal results in a negotiation. It often occurs towards the end of a negotiation because it becomes a “fall-back” position when one or more of the other conflict resolution styles fails to work as expected. The major negatives of compromise are that the negotiators need to be aware of the natural give-and-take rhythm of a negotiation and that there is often little apparent creativity exercised. Compromise may be appropriate when there is little or no common ground between the negotiating parties, i.e., it can be effectively used when the possible outcomes of each party are mutually exclusive of each other. It can also be effective when the parties are similar in power or when no consensus has been reached. Compromise is not appropriate when the parties are characterized by differences in power or when the negotiation is a complex problem that might require a problem-solving approach. e. Collaborating Conflict Resolution Style. This approach, high on both the assertiveness and cooperativeness axes, is often described as integration, creative problem-solving, or win-win negotiation. This is true “process” negotiating because the parties are creatively working towards achieving the goals, objectives, and outcomes for all parties involved. Collaboration is not soft negotiating; soft negotiation would better describe the avoiding or accommodating styles instead. Collaboration is appropriately used when the negotiation issues are complex and a creative or novel synthesis of ideas is required. It is also effective as a consensus or commitment development tool when implementing the terms of the negotiation agreement that may require significant effort on the part of all the parties. However, the downside is that the process of reaching collaboration mandates sincere effort by the parties, requiring a lot of time and psychic energy to reach that consensus. Most negotiators don’t do this well. Use of the collaborating style is not appropriate when the problem is simple because the outcome may not be worth the necessary time and effort to achieve consensus. Because of the extensive time factor involved, it is not effective when an immediate solution is required or when the parties do not have sufficient problem-solving skills. However, it is an excellent negotiating style when all parties to the negotiation have a history of long-term, trusting relations. V. Conclusion Depending on the specific negotiating situation, the other negotiator’s personality style, your desired outcomes, and the time available, any of the five conflict resolution styles may be appropriate and effective. The key to becoming more prepared is to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each style in the context of a given negotiation and the personality styles of the negotiators sitting

6

across the table. Before your next negotiation, formalize your own goals, objectives, and preferred outcomes, try to typecast the other negotiating party, anticipate their probable negotiating style, and consider how you can position your goals, objectives, and desired outcomes so that the other party can accept them. REFERENCES Anderson, K., Getting What You Want: How to Reach Agreement and Resolve Conflict Every Time, Plume, New York, NY, 1993. Thomas, K.W., “Conflict and Conflict Management,” in Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago, IL, 1976, pp. 889-935.

7

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Communication & Personality in Negotiation

...Negotiation is a part of individual’s daily lives and has a measurable effect especially in the diverse social and changes in structural factors of the current environment. Although individual differs in personality and communication, the skills in negotiations is vital to achieve success. With this in mind, that the combination of communications skills and personality does have an effect in successful negotiation situation whether in integrative, or distributive, or alternative shape. Negotiation is defined according to different cultures. According to Yook and Albert in 1998, negotiations can differ greatly across cultures on what is negotiable and what occurs in negotiations (Yook & Albert, 1998). According to Foster in his 1992, Bargaining across borders: How to negotiate business successfully, “Americans tend to view negotiating as a competitive process of offers and counteroffers, while the Japanese tend to view the negotiation as an opportunity for information sharing” (Foster, 1992, p. 272). These differences in definition also reflect on how each individual culture behave and convey messages in the negotiating table. The behavior of the person will have an impact in the perception of his or her personality that also has measurable effect in communicating his or her ideas and information in negotiating table. Communication according to American Heritage Dictionary is the exchange of thoughts, messages, or information as by speech, signals, writing, or behavior...

Words: 1206 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Consulting

...Cell Phone Negotiations Shyretta Christopher University of Phoenix MGT/557 Negotiations, Power & Politics Dr. George R. Monk January 19, 2015 Cell Phone Negotiations In the world, cell phones have turned out to be the jump for the device. It is a demand and by way of that, it has converted into a money business. It can carry on making money as a spreading skill on the cell phones. Value is significant but has the accepting how to labor with dealers with not the same cultural backgrounds, gender, and personalities are equally important. In this paper, it will explain how this all comes together for a negotiation between the Chinese (female) and Americans (male). The American team seeks a cell phone price of $6 per unit and symbolizes the following Hofstede’s cultural dimensions: individualistic, low-power distance, low-term orientation and low-context. The American team wants an inexpensive price. The other team is an all-female negotiating team from China that offers cell phones with a $9 per unit price tag. The Chinese team wants a merchant for their cell phones which permits them to make proceeds. The Chinese side symbolizes the following Hofstede’s cultural dimensions collectivistic, high-power distance, long-term orientation and high context. Gender difference, personalities and culture has an influence on the negotiation. Also, it will give details on how each side’s perceptions, cognitions, and emotions also played a part in the negotiation. Chinese...

Words: 1348 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Mgt/557 Cell Phone Negotiations

...Cell Phone Negotiations MGT 557 April 8, 2013 Cell Phone Negotiations In today’s society, cell phones have become and necessitate and also have become a billion dollar business. Distributors of cell phones look for maximum profit by buying from manufactures’ at the cheapest price. Not only does price matter in negotiations, but considerations for individual differences such as cultural differences must occur for the outcome of a negotiation to be successful. In today’s economy, it is not uncommon for companies to go overseas for cheaper manufactures’ cost to increase profits. However, American companies who wish to compete internally in manufacturing products face the high labor costs in the United States compared to foreign countries. In this paper, the author will discuss a negotiation between a Chinese and an American negotiation team over cell phone cost per unit and possible influences that go into the negotiations such as gender difference, personality, culture and perception, cognition, and emotion. Summary of Cell Phone Negotiation The negotiation involves two teams, the all-American negotiating team from the United States and...

Words: 992 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Leadership

...those who hold a position of authority and may utilize the power that comes from their position, as well as their personal power to influence others. Whereas the informal leaders are those without a formal position authorities within the organization but demonstrate leadership by influencing those around them through personal forms of power. From the class we came to know Leadership is about articulating visions, embodying values, and creating the environment within which things can be accomplished and it is the process of influencing the activities of an organized group toward goal achievement.We came to know that there are few traits that show relatively strong relations with leadership. And the best example of a trait approach is the charismatic leadership. The important traits are discussed below. 1. Intelligence: Observed general mental ability correlates with leadership, whereas the actual intelligent has smaller correlation. * (Emotional Intelligence): This one will allow predicting leadership beyond the general mental ability. And also people with high EQ demonstrate a high level of self-awareness, motivation, emphathy and social skills. 2. Personality (the Big 5) : It is positively correlated with leader rise & leader effectiveness. It is called Big 5 model, because it rates an individual according to O C E A N (personality traits) Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism. 3. Self-esteem: The higher the self-esteem of...

Words: 1452 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Azda

...Research Working Papers Series When Does Gender Matter in Negotiation? Hannah Riley and Kathleen L. McGinn September 2002 RWP02-036 The views expressed in the KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or Harvard University. All works posted here are owned and copyrighted by the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. 1 When Does Gender Matter in Negotiation? Hannah Riley John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University 79 JFK Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 496-4717 Kathleen L. McGinn Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University Soldiers Field, Boston, MA 02163 (617) 495-6901 The authors thank Linda Babcock, Max Bazerman, Jim Sebenius and the reviewers of the 2002 Academy of Management meeting for their helpful comments on this paper. 2 3 Abstract We propose that two situational dimensions moderate gender effects in negotiation. Structural ambiguity refers to potential variation in a party’s perception of the bargaining range and appropriate standards for agreement. Gender triggers are situational factors that make gender salient and relevant to behavior or expectations. Based on a review of field and experimental data and social psychological theory on individual difference, we explain how structural ambiguity and gender triggers make negotiations ripe for gender effects. 4 Gender often appears to...

Words: 8018 - Pages: 33

Free Essay

Bus 526 Week 6 Assignment 3 – Strayer New

...The Link Below To Purchase A+ Graded Material Instant Download http://budapp.net/BUS-526-Assignment-3-Strayer-New-BUS526A3.htm Assignment 3: The Role of Communication and Personality in Negotiation Negotiation involves people interacting with other people. How you communicate and react with people can be the difference between a successful or unsuccessful negotiation. Use the Internet to locate two (2) different major negotiations: one (1) that displays the role of communication and personality in a successful negotiation and one (1) that displays those roles in an unsuccessful negotiation. Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you: 1. Describe the two (2) negotiations you chose to study. 2. Determine why the successful negotiation was effective. Determine why the unsuccessful negotiation was not effective and propose suggestions that could have positively affected the outcome. 3. Evaluate the role of personality attributes in the selected negotiations. 4. Determine how communication affected the outcomes of the negotiations. 5. Identify the different ways in which a negotiator may try to influence the other party. Determine which method of influence was the most effective in your selected examples. 6. Formulate a strategy that would build trust and improve both negotiations based on relationships. 7. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your...

Words: 318 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Cell Phone Negotiations

...Cell Phone Negotiations Shannon Moe MGT557/Negotiation, Power, and Politics March 21, 2016 Augusta Inniss Cell Phone Negotiations Cell phones have become a necessity in the lives of people of all ages around the globe. Because of this, the mobile phone industry is a billion dollar industry. As in any business, cell phone distributors look for the lowest possible purchase price from manufacturers to make the highest profit. This strategy is standard for companies in a global economy and negotiations must occur to get the lowest possible price. The difficulty is in negotiating with suppliers around the globe with different cultural backgrounds. Consideration of such things as gender, personalities, culture and perception are a must for each negotiation. Not doing so could result in loss of profitability and growth. Typically most distributors look overseas for manufacturers because of the cheaper labor rates abroad. This paper will evaluate negotiation styles of Chinese and American teams' negotiation for the lowest possible cell phone manufacturing price using Hofstede's cultural dimensions theories. Hofstede's theories use four dimensions to describe differences in cultures and negotiation styles including individualism-collectivism, power distance, career success vs. quality of life and uncertainty avoidance. The cultural differences of each team are described and then a scenario of how the negotiation would go is developed (Lewicki, Barry, & Saunders...

Words: 1382 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Community and Personality and Negotiations

...Communication and Personality in Negotiations One of the more difficult negotiations that most people will experience in their lifetime is the negotiation process that begins when a job offer is made, and the initial disclosure of salary and benefits by the company occurs. The ensuing negotiation process is typically one that has numerous rapid back and forth communications between the company representative and the perspective employee. The method in which the perspective employee communicates their needs, wants, and desires to the company, and the personality traits of both the perspective employee and company will be key in determining the outcome. This paper will explain the communication process and the personality traits of the author and the Clinical Research Organization (CRO) he works for when negotiating a conversion from Contractor to full-time employee. Author and Company History In November of 1993, the author chose to leave the Hospitality Industry and investigate other opportunities that would utilize some of his key skills and went to work or a Clinical Research Organization. Since this was a change between industries, there was no negotiation as the salary was competitive, and the benefits were much better than anything the author had received as an employee of Marriott. The author was successful in moving up through the organization from an Invoicing Analyst to the Director of Global Invoicing based on his readiness to learn the business and key skills previously...

Words: 1483 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Cultural Differences Influence Negotiations and Negotiating Behaviour

...Introduction International business is not just about nationalities, it is also about cultures. Cultures influence negotiation styles, values and communications. Image a situation where a Japanese supermarket manager negotiating with an American salmon supplier with their own negotiation styles: the Japanese negotiator want to extent the length of negotiation in order to seek the best result of the deal, but the American negotiator treats time as money and he/she wants to quickly reach the agreement (Evans & Richardson, 2010). This essay will firstly discuss the definitions of culture and negotiation, and then it will discuss cultural influence on negotiation and its behaviour; finally it will suggest possible strategies in addressing difficulties caused by cultural differences. This essay will argue that cultural impacts increase the difficulties of cross-culture negotiation, but negotiators can successfully manage the difficulties by increasing their knowledge of different cultures and continuously practise relevant strategies. Culture Culture is a term that can be explained in many different ways. According to Alon and Brett (2007), culture is a process of socialisation that people learn a shared pattern of behaviour and affective understandings. These patterns distinguish one group of people from another. Carrell, Shank and Barbero (2009) also state that culture is not physical elements but the perceptions that members consider them. People from the same culture usually...

Words: 1872 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Communication and Personality in Negotiations

...Communication and Personality in Negotiations Communication and Personality in Negotiations Negotiating is a physical contact sport. To be successful essentially one has to be skilled at convincing others to pay attention to one’s cause, deliberate the cause, and determine if the cause is worthy of his or her assistance. The negotiater does not need to make a judgment call; they need only to decide if they will allow one to move forward toward the negotiator goal. It is inevitable that whenever two or more parties make contact with each other undoubtly there will be some form of conflict. Deciding the different interests is a matter of ascertaining a commonality of benefit. Managers are proficient at forging such repositioning of individual appeal. People do the same when solving a problem. One convinces the other to contemplate alternatives in the anticipation of reaching a joint agreement. The purpose of negotiating is to enthuse or compel the other individual to concede to one’s terms. Persuading others is a necessary tool in negotiations. People are inspired by numerous emotions such as fear, a longing to be accepted, admiration for the other person, or materialism and greed. Negotiations happen every day and in various businesses, and in many official capacities such as the Government Administration, union workers, managers, leaders, police officers, individuals, and every person that needs or wants to sway another is a negotiation. This paper will provide...

Words: 1201 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Miami School Board Discirt Negotiation

...Communication and Personality In Negotiation Linda short MGT 445 January 9, 2012 Sangeeta Walsh Communication and Personality in Negotiation Individual communicate on a daily basic, he or she negotiate with friends, coworkers, family, and at home. Each element of our personal lives entails negotiation talents. The capacity to negotiate determines the boost to accomplishments, prospects, and enhances relations. Negotiating talents are not considered aspects of this country's schooling; although negotiation is used more frequently than mathematics ability, each day of the week. These talents generate the center of occupational and private lives. In our negotiation process with prioritizing in most cases are under the rule of irrational escalation of commitment. According to Lewicki-Saunders-Barry, escalation of commitment is partly individual perception and judgment (2006). According to Lewicki−Saunders−Barry, we consider negotiation as a process between individuals, within groups, organizations, between groups reaching joint agreement about differing needs or ideas.” For some people, negotiating appears easy, but other people view the process of negotiation as a conflict (Lewicki, Saunders, & Barry, 2006).  The purpose of this paper is to define communication and personality in negotiation and the roles of how they contribute or detract...

Words: 1433 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Referent Power

...frequently a personal trait of the individual. A personal assistant for example, who has lower status in the organisation may also possess a degree of high expert power because they have extensive knowledge of how the business operates such as knowing where everything is located or are able to deal with difficult situations. Lewicki et al. (1985:249) states that people and countries will act sensibly when they have used up all other available possibilities. In any negotiation situation, expert power is the most standard type of power that is applied. Expert power consists of the persuasive nature of the information itself. It pertains to the amassing of information and how it is presented and is used with the intent of changing of how a counter party views the issues. It is the contention of Lewicki et al. (1985:251) that expert power is a unique kind of information power. Information power can be applied by any individual who has studied and prepared their position prior to the start of a negotiation. According to Lewicki et al, expert power is rendered to any individual who are perceived as having mastered and organized a great abundance of information. Lewicki et al. believe that there are processes that a negotiator can use to establish their expertise in the mind of the other party: By quoting facts and figures. By 'name dropping'. By referring to documented...

Words: 4419 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Week 1 Individual

...Communication and Personality in Negotiation Negotiation is the act by two parties who discuss, transact, and come to an agreement, which is mutually beneficial to both parties, (Dictionary.com, 2011.) Negotiation happens daily, whether people believe they are or not. Parents negotiate with their children to do chores, husbands discuss big purchases such as a new car or house with their spouse, and children negotiate with friends, siblings, and schoolmates for trinkets and small favors. During negotiations, a persons’ personality, mood, and bias can color what each party may receive out of the transactions. This paper will discuss a personal negotiation concerning how to buy a new vehicle. In addition this paper will illustrate how communication, personality, and body language influenced the negotiation environment, and how personal bias can play a part in the agreement process. Buying a Car Perry and his wife Holly have been married almost three years, when his three boys came to visit for the summer. Included in the family was Holly’s son, Tony. What was once a small family of three increased to six, once the boys landed in Little Rock at the airport. Current transportation consisted of a small four-door Corsica and a two-door brown Thunderbird that was not a trustworthy vehicle. The vehicle situation was not an acceptable accommodation if the parents decided to take everyone on a family outing. Perry and Holly decided they needed to find a much bigger vehicle. The chosen...

Words: 1454 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Negotiaton

...Individual Differences in Negotiation Effectiveness There are mainly four factors that influence how effectively individuals negotiate- a) moods/emotions b) Personality c) Culture d) Gender A) MOODS/EMOTIONS- The influence of moods/emotions depends upon the type of negotiation as well. In distributive negotiations, it is seen that negotiators who are in a position of power or have equal status and who show anger, negotiate better results because their anger results in concessions. Negotiators, when angry, feel more focused and assertive when striking a bargain. On the other hand, for those in less powerful position or lesser stature, displaying anger can only lead to bad outcomes. Similarly, anxiety also tends to have an effect on negotiations. For example it was seen that individuals experiencing more anxiety about a negotiation used more deceptions in dealing with others. Moreover, anxious negotiators expect lower outcomes, respond quickly to an offer and exit the process too early, which leads them to obtain worse outcome. These all moods are related to distributive negotiations. In Integrative negotiations, positive moods and emotions appear to lead to more integrative agreements. Positive mood resulting in creativity and productivity may be one of the reasons. B) PERSONALITY TRAITS Personality traits and outcomes are related very weakly. It is seen that negotiators who are extrovert are not very successful in distributive bargaining, because extroverts...

Words: 996 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Help

...Communication and Personality in Negotiation Everybody negotiates on a regular basis. People negotiate at work, at home, with friends, family, and coworkers. According to Answers.com (2008), “Negotiation is the process of two individuals or groups reaching joint agreement about differing needs or ideas” (para.19). Oftentimes people negotiate and are unaware they are negotiating. For some people, negotiating appears easy, but other people view the process of negotiation as a conflict (Lewicki, Saunders, & Barry, 2006). Analyzing the roles of communication and personality in negotiation and how they contribute or detract from the negotiations will be reviewed. Included will be an example of when I have participated in a negotiation situation. Verbal and Nonverbal Communication “Negotiation is a process of communication in which parties aim to ‘send a message’ to the other side and influence each other” (Beyond Intractability, 2003-2007). Communication techniques are a vital role in negotiating. Negotiating is about effective communications. When negotiating, communication occurs at two levels, the logical level and the pragmatic level (Lewicki, Saunders, & Barry, 2006). A logical and pragmatic message received by the other party is communication. What is said is not the only point, the information inferred, intended, conveyed, or perceived is a vital factor. Thus, tremendous care must be taken to direct pragmatic messages. In order to avoid sending the wrong message negotiators...

Words: 273 - Pages: 2