Premium Essay

Peter The Great Absolute Ruler

Submitted By
Words 1502
Pages 7
Peter I, also known as Peter the Great, is arguably one of the greatest absolute rulers that ever held power over the country of Russia. This man was able to achieve his goals during his reign despite the problems that he faced. During this time, some basic issues in several European countries included territory, economy, and religion. However, these issues varied depending on which country someone was responsible for. As for Peter the Great, he had to face the Church who held a large power but was not willing to change. Another domestic affair that he tried to tackle was education for the rest of Europe was advancing at a quicker pace than that of Russia. Not only that, there were several prominent wars that were fought while he was in power. …show more content…
It seemed that each religious group felt as though there was only one way to go, and it was their way. This caused there to be rebellious citizens and various wars in certain countries. In Russia specifically, the Orthodox Church held a large sum of the country’s power. Peter I saw this as a threat to his name as an absolute ruler. He was the one person who was supposed to be able to hold control of Russia without anyone else interfering. To add on, the church owned serfs and vast amounts of land which only added to the feeling of a threat. The last issue with the church was that it refused to modernize resulting in a setback in Russia moving forward along with its neighboring countries. So, when Patriarch Adrian, the ruler of the church passed away, Peter the Great decided not to appoint anyone into the position after him (“Peter I”). A year later in 1701, a department in Russia’s government took control over the church property. This department was known as the Monastyrskii Prikaz (Truman). This was not Peter’s decision. It was evident that it was not because monks were being paid and there were monastic revenues that were being given to the church. So, Peter the Great’s attempt to see a weak spot in the church’s power did not present itself because while it was in control of the government, it continued to gain more wealth regardless of it no longer having a single …show more content…
Before Peter the Great began to rule Russia, there were many unresolved issues with other countries. So, one of his goals knowing what he was walking into was to make sure that his army was strong and properly trained. This ties into the education aspect that was already discussed, but the soldiers being educated would help them when the time came. War was not something that was easily avoided in Europe’s kingdoms. One of the most well known wars was the Great Northern War. If something was wanted badly by a ruler, nothing could stop them. For this reason, Russia got involved in this war against Sweden which lasted for 21 years (Cheney). As one may know, both sides of people in a war have to give up money and some power while it is going on. There is no guarantee that a certain side will be victorious. Russia decided to go to war with Sweden because they held control over a territory that Peter saw as important. The previous rulers of Russia focused on the Black Sea, but Peter turned his attention toward the Baltic Sea instead, since Austria was getting prepared to fight for the Spanish Succession. Russia lost many of the first battles in this war, but later on they went on to win the Battle of Gangut which was their first naval victory. Years later, on September 10, 1721, the area along the east side of the Baltic Sea was officially ceded over to Russia with the Treaty of Nystad (“Peter I”). This allowed

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Absolute Rulers

...have managed to build up and break down their country through the process of trial and error. An Absolute ruler is someone who has complete power and control over anything that has to do with to his territory. Two good examples of these kinds of rulers are Peter the Great ofRussia and Louis XIV of France. Peter the Great of Russia is a great example of an absolute ruler. Peter theGreat came into power and he was in complete control of every bit and piece of Russia. Peter wanted to form a road from Russia to the West. This road is something that would help Russia in many different ways to transport good and people, but he wasn't always helping. After Peter went to war with Sweden he lost the first time. After his defeat he built another army a new and more efficient army. This was the downfall to his rule because he didn't think about the immense loss Russia had faced with that defeat. Peter was too focused on going to war again. Being blinded by this defeat making him want to fight more was not the right move. Russia before this war had no military except the inefficient & shady Streltsky . After he died Russia had a professional military. Peter also built a Navy from the ground up. At the same time him beingblind and hungry for war made him unaware to what Russia needed for the creationof a large middle class. King Louis XIV of France was another example of an absolute ruler because hewent out to obtain anything that made him and France more powerful. King Louis forced all...

Words: 547 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Is Peter The Great Considered An Absolute Monarch

...An absolute monarch is someone who has absolute power among their people. One absolute monarch in history is Peter the Great. Peter was a Russian czar. Peter was considered an absolute monarch because he strengthen the government and reduce nobility. Peter rise to power when Tsar Alexi died so him and his brother Ivan shared the throne until Ivan died. After Ivan’s death, Peter was left as a solo Tsar. Around late 1600s early 1700s, Peter accomplish multiple things as ruler. He led Russia out of medieval times and made it a leading European state. In order for Russia to reach that position he strengthen the military service in Russia by adding a navy, he expanded Russia’s borders, centralize the royal power by buying all Russian institution under his control. He...

Words: 595 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

El Greco, Diego Velazquez And Miguel De Cervantes

...stripped the nobles of their power and there land. He also refused to allow the Protestants (Huguenots) to build walls around their towns and cities for protection. France faced all areas controlled by the Habsburg. For the first 12 years the Habsburg dominated but for the last 18 years France won. Prussia was controlled by Frederick II or Frederick the great. He became king in 1749 and he died without an heir. He believed that the fundamental role of government was to expand its territories. He was one of the most powerful rulers of...

Words: 1096 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Did Louis Xiv Oppose Religious Toleration

...between religious unity and political unity? (pg 188) On Page 188 it says the following about King Louis XIV’s views on religions and leading a nation’ “Believing a country could not be governed by one king and one law unless it was also under one religious system…,”. This quote is very important because prior to Louis’s rule the Edict of Nantes was put in place which stated that the French Protestants could practice whatever religion they wanted, so King Louis, being Catholic, wanted his nation to be all one religion. The quote also refers to the unity of the religion in France, which in turn, would unify France under King Louis XIV, according to Louis XIV. What value did Peter the Great of Russia place on military prowess? What does this tell us about his vision of the proper role of national ruler? (pg...

Words: 1303 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Did Catherine The Great Have Absolute Power

...Catherine the Great, also known as Catherine II, is the longest-ruling female of Russia. She was born on May 2, 1729 in Stettin, Prussia. In 1744, Catherine moved to Russia where she started her relationship with Grand Duke Peter. Catherine and Peter became married on August 21st, 1745 and didn’t exactly have a happy relationship. Once Empress Elizabeth died, Peter inherited the throne and Catherine received the title Empress Consort. Peter was a bad leader, he alienated nobles and angered the Orthodox Church. Within six months of rule, Peter was overthrown in a coup that Catherine was a part of and not long after being overthrown, was murdered. With Peter overthrown, Catherine became the ruler. While in power, Catherine modernized Russia, made Russia a major European power, expanded the borders of Russia, and made reforms in agriculture and education. Though Catherine did many good things for Russia, there were still rebellions. Cossack Yemelyan...

Words: 617 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Dbq Absolutism Research Paper

...Absolutism of monarchs was a very popular trend in the 16th and 17th centuries. Peter the Great, Louis XIV, and the Sultans of the Ottoman empires greatly demonstrated this notion with their complete control over their subjects. This was a revival of this same idea that has existed in the Medieval era with with kings with complete control of several provinces and had knights who defended them. Absolutism was a time of complete tyranny in Europe during this time due to the selfish and vanity of the rulers, the complete dependence on the rulers, and the chaos that resulted in or because of their reign. These absolutist leaders were very prideful putting others down and setting themselves up above them. King James I said "the state of monarchy is the supreme thing upon earth" setting his reign in England above everything else (Doc 2). Some monarchs see their subjects as people who just follow their commands. This allowed for no room to give the monarch advice to help the country if their was another way to help it. Louis XIV of...

Words: 648 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Competitive State System In Europe During The 17th And 18th Century

...In Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries, monarchs and rulers sought to increase their power both domestically within their own states and internationally by adding to their territories and populations. Both in merging their power internally and expanding their power externally, they employed three features of state-building: control, extraction, and integration. In the late 1700s, both the Industrial revolution and French revolution of 1789 strengthened the awareness in European minds not just that Europeans were different from the rest of the world, but also that Europeans were “progressing” promptly while the rest of the world seemed to be deteriorating, that Europeans were somehow exceptional—better, even—than the rest. Nineteenth century...

Words: 796 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Absolutism

... paved roads, or other modern technology, it took weeks to convey orders from the central governments to the provinces. Rulers also suffered from a lack of information about their realms, making it virtually impossible to police and tax the population effectively. Local power structures that held legal privileges, such as nobles, the church, provincial and other national assemblies, town councils, and guilds, could not easily be rescinded. Many people also spoke a language different from that of the Crown, further decreasing their willingness to obey its commands. 4. The Thirty Years War began as a religious civil war between...

Words: 1680 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Miss

...ENLIGHTENED DESPOTISM Enlightened despots believed that political change could best come from above; from the ruler. However, they were encouraged by the philosophers to make good laws to promote human happiness. How did these monarchs differ from earlier unenlightened monarchs of the past? The difference lay in tempo. These new despots acted abruptly and desired quicker results. They were impatient with all that stood in the way of their reforms. In addition, they justified their authority on the grounds of usefulness, not divine right. These new monarchs were rational and reformist and they regarded political change as possible and desirable. Frederick the Great, Catherine the Great, and Joseph II are good examples of Enlightened Despots. Frederick II (Frederick the Great), the most famous Prussian absolute monarch and a military genius, pursued an aggressive foreign policy. In 1740 he seized from Austria the province of Silesia. His action culminated in a major European conflict, the Seven Years' War (1756-1763), in which he was pitted against a powerful European coalition of Austria, Russia, and France. Frederick, aided only by England, barely managed to retain Silesia. In 1772 Frederick shared in the first partition of Poland by annexing western Poland. Frederick the Great was an almost perfect example of the enlightened despot. He was familiar with the ideas of the eighteenth-century reformers and a friend of Voltaire. Many of the philosophers, including Voltaire...

Words: 720 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Social Media: the New Opium of People


...compositions of two different, Marxist explanation of class struggles and Freudian perspective on authoritative behavior, the critical approach on media and communication have been a growing aspect of our daily life since the second war era in which rulers used the mass propaganda by using media as an ideological state apparatus especially on increasing power of Hitler’s Germany. Today, we live in a world in which this critical approach is the very canon of decreasing the exploitation of ruler class who spend huge amount of money only for media and communication. (Peter and Simmonson 2004)
 From the perspective of working class, the picture seems more colorful than fifteen years ago if we consider this criticism of media and its trustworthiness by the effects of social media and blogging. One may clearly say that “Now we have our own instruments to clarify the fact and enjoy publishing our own opinion.” and even I can nod my head and ignore the “dark side of the moon”1 presented by Karl Marx on the topic of exploitation, however, in this essay, I’m going to follow my ideological ancestors and say “matter a fact, it’s all dark”2 as a rejection to this very uprising idea that alternative media makes us less exploited by ruler class of Turkey because our own counter-hegemony attitudes on social media tricks us into a brand new hegemony, the hegemony that forwards our energy into the deep hole of social 1  The  name  of  famous  Pink  Floyd  album...

Words: 2061 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Similarities Between The American Revolution And The Enlightenment

...progress could form new governments, and “it inspired those who later made the great revolutions of the modern era” (Strayer, Chapter 15, 747). With human progress and human reason together, some Enlightenment thinkers began to think of humans as perfect, able to rule themselves and without worrying of another, higher being. The power of the people stood out in many of the new government ideas, giving more power to the people under monarchies. Any government should give its people their basis rights and needs. If anyone should threaten these, Enlightenment thinkers believed that the government should seek to protect those rights. If the government should fail in any of these tasks, “the people … have the right to overthrow the government and establish a better one” (Mills). The government’s basis should be, in general, the people and their wills (Rothman). Since many of the people who might believe that their government may not be ruling fair, political revolution occurred. Revolutionaries often imbedded John Locke’s ideas into the reasoning for the Atlantic Revolutions. John Locke was an influential Enlightenment philosopher who wrote a great deal about government and politics. Locke strongly believed in the rights of each person of which nobody should violate or threaten. Freedom and equality from birth are the two most important rights of any man (Mills). Not only does this go against absolute monarchies or any other oppressive government, but it also goes against slavery...

Words: 1574 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

1848 Revolutions

...Luke Rodia HIS 1012 Assignment 2: How far were the 1848 revolutions stimulated by socio-economic rather than political factors? The revolutions of 1848 were a series of simultaneous revolutions across a number of countries, mainly in Europe. A number of different reasons brought about these revolutions but each individual country had different reasons to why they had a revolution. As a result of this we cannot fully determine whether the 1848 revolutions were driven by socioeconomic or political reasons until we have looked at each major case individually, as this will allow us to make an accurate judgement on why the revolution occurred. To look at each country and their revolutionary events will allow us to see whether the 1848 revolutions were linked in any way, either politically or socioeconomically or if they were individual events which happened at the same time. On top of this we need to address the fact that not all European countries had revolutions, and some countries did begin to have revolutionary movements but they failed to take off as full revolutions. Once these points have been addressed then we can understand what stimulated the 1848 revolutions. The years leading up to the 1848 revolutions had set the tone for revolution. Across Europe there was wide spread hunger due to a failure in crops. Jones writes in his book “But events elsewhere had already taken on dangerous proportions. The potato crop in 1846 and 1847 had been destroyed by disease, causing food...

Words: 2094 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Political Philosophy

...generations to generations in written and oral accounts, never failed to mention the rise and fall of great civilizations. In every epoch that mankind has gone through, a certain society or culture will always take an honor or disgrace in the center stage of history. This might be an honor credited for an achievement over a magnitude of victory, or a disgrace in a painful experience of defeat. From the earliest known Indian and Chinese civilizations in the East, to the powerful triumvirate of the Egyptian, Greek and Roman civilizations in the West, we can only say of two things — they all gloriously rose and proved to be kingdoms of undaunted power and might, but fall on their knees in bitter shame and demise. Although chronicles of our thousand-year-old history might not be that clear as to foretell the rise and fall of these great civilizations, however we all know that behind the stronghold of these empires, there commands a ruler, a great ruler — A leader that is responsible for meticulously planning the moves and conducts towards the rise of his civilization, and he who must be blamed for every fall and defeat that his polity may yield. A ruler, in any detail of circumstances, brings the name of his civilization. A ruler brings life and, as well, grants death. Thus, from this standpoint, we can ask more deeply. What is it to become a Ruler? How can we say so that a ruler is effective and when he becomes ineffective? And what are...

Words: 6363 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

A Summary of Theological Reflection on Jesus' Temptation, Baptism, Transfigutation

...Theological Meaning of Jesus’ Temptation Mark’s account on Jesus’ temptation is very brief. Most of the Mark account is found also in the Matthew and Luke versions, with the exception of "with the wild animals." According to the texts, after being baptized, Jesus fasted for forty days and nights in the Judean Desert. During this time, the devil appeared to Jesus and tempted him three times. Jesus having refused each temptation, the devil departed and angels came and brought nourishment to Jesus. Matt.4:2 set the stage for the great temptation involving Jesus. “He fasted for forty days and forty nights, and afterwards he was hungry.” We immediately read, "The tempter approached him and said to him, if you are the Son of God, command that these stones become loaves of bread" (vs. 3). The devil looks for the best time to tempt you and me. It may be when the Christian is without a job, is having family problems, or the local church is experiencing difficulties that the devil makes his appearance and appeal. But Jesus shows us that regardless of the circumstances surrounding us, we are able to overcome the devil. The devil quotes verbatim from the Septuagint translation regarding Psalms 91: 11, 12. While the devil correctly quotes the scripture, however, he does not correctly apply the teaching contained in Psalms 91: 11, 12 to the circumstances at hand. Hence, just because scripture is quoted does not necessarily mean the truth is being taught. Jesus both correctly quotes and...

Words: 1317 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Unit 3 Terms

...1. Absolute Monarch-form of government where the monarch (usually a king or queen) has absolute power; monarch has unrestricted political power over the sovereign state and it’s people; usually born into power 2. Age of Reason-18th century movement that followed after the mysticism, religion, and superstition of the Middle Ages 3. Agrarian-cultivated land; person who advocates a redistribution of landed property, especially as part of a social movement 4. Akbar The Great (Mughal India)-Mughal emperor from 1556-death; extended power over most of India Continent; united Muslim and Hindu peoples with his policy of religious cooperation 5. Atheists-person who lacks the belief in the existence in God’s or a God 6. Batavia, Indonesia-Fort established in 1619 as headquarters of Dutch East India Company operations in Indonesia; today the city of Jakarta. 7. Calvin, John-1509-1564. French theologian. Developed the Christian theology known as Calvinism - believed in predestination and a strict sense of morality. Attracted Protestant followers with his teachings. 8. Cash Crop-readily salable crop that is grown and gathered for the market (vegetables, cotton, tobacco) 9. Circumnavigation- travel all the way around the Earth 10. Colonization-physical process whereby the colonizer takes over another place, putting its own government in charge and either moving its own people into the place or bringing in indentured outsiders to gain control of the people...

Words: 2104 - Pages: 9