Free Essay

Peter the Great

In: Historical Events

Submitted By me1986
Words 2922
Pages 12
James Crarer 12EUC709 - The Russian Empire The Russian Empire Essay “In what ways did Peter the Great’s reforms transform the concept of the Empire?”

Peter the Great’s reforms are widely considered to be one of the most defining moments in Russian history. Beginning as an effort to modernize the country’s military, as the era progressed the reforms expanded, instigating economic development, governmental modernization, intellectual reorientation and social reconstruction.1 The injection of European practices into Russia arguably set the precedence for the onslaught of a top down modernization that has since been a trait of Russian state development, as well as illuminating the beginning of the transition into a form of Russian modernity. The geographical historian Dennis Shaw, reiterates this by suggesting Peter exposed Russia “to the ideas of the Renaissance and the Scientific Revolution. Building on the achievements of his father, Peter launched a thoroughgoing reform or modernization of his realm with the aim of transforming it into a major European state.”2 In order to comprehend this transformation of the Russian empire, an appreciation of meaning of the term ‘empire’ is required. Stephen Howe suggests that ‘an empire is a large, composite, multiethnic or multinational political unit, usually created by conquest, and divided between a dominant center and subordinate, sometimes far distant, peripheries.’3 While Howe’s definition provides a coherent basis from which to judge the concept of Empire from a modern day perspective, the question of the transformation of the concept of empire within Russia requires an appreciation of what the concept was considered as within Russia prior to the era of Peter’s reforms. Moreover, it is also important to have an understanding as to what constitutes a transformation. In this instance, the Oxford

1 Denis J.B Shaw, A strong and prosperous condition’ — the geography of state building and social reform in Peter the Great’s Russia (Political Geography 18 (1999) 991–1015) p.992 – URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629899000347 - (Date Accessed - May 3, 2013) 2 Denis J.B Shaw, Geographical Practice and its significance in Peter the Great’s Russia (Journal of Historical Geography, 22, 2, 160176, 1996,) p. 161 – URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305748896900110 - (Date Accessed - May 3, 2013) 3

Stephen Howe, Empire: A very short introduction (Oxford University Press, 2002) p.30

1

James Crarer 12EUC709 - The Russian Empire English dictionary definition of: “a marked change in form, nature, or appearance”4, provides the most coherent explanation in explaining this particular topic. Moreover, it seems at least to this writer, that unlike in the modern era whereby a transformation of something is generally considered to be ‘positive’, highlighting what we in the western world would consider ‘progression’; analyzing the manner in which Peter’s reforms transformed the concept of empire should not be done so with this air of positive or negative judgment attached to it, thus an appreciation of objectivity should therefore also be applied to such a term. This essay will highlight how the traditional concept of the Russian empire was transformed into a more Europeanized concept of empire through Peter the Great’s reforms. The first part will assess the key elements that made up the traditional concept of empire in the pre-Petrine era, focusing explicitly on the manner in which Muscovite empire was ruled and the importance religion played in that. The second part will assess how the key reforms of Peter the Great represent how the image of the ruler as Emperor and the symbolism this has is hugely influential in the wider transformation of the concept of empire. The concluding argument will suggest the creation of the image of the ‘Emperor’ set in motion the top-down, authoritarian modernization that transformed the concept of the empire as well as becoming an enduring characteristic later imperial and modern Russia.

The first question to pose is: what characteristics made up the concept of empire prior to Peter the Great’s era? In order to answer this question it is important to assess the foundations and structures within which the 17th century Muscovite Empire functioned, thus providing a contextual appreciation to impact of Peter’s reforms. The first important characteristic is the relationship between the state and the Christian Orthodox Church. Modern day interpretations place politics and religion in separate ideological spheres, however such a dichotomy did not exist prior to Peter’s reign. Instead politics and religion were symbiotic entities, informing and influencing one another by occupying the same ideological

Oxford Dictionaries, Definition of Transformation (Oxford University Press April 2010) – URL: http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/transformation (Date Accessed May 09, 2013) 4

2

James Crarer 12EUC709 - The Russian Empire space. This point is substantiated by Marc Raeff, who suggests: “It is clear that the Muscovite regime never conceived of itself as existing outside the ecclesiastical framework … the tsar and his subjects defined themselves as members of the Russian Orthodox Church, whose teachings functioned as what we call nowadays an ideology.”5 Moreover, the major influences on this particular political ideology and practices were firstly the idea of Moscow as the ‘Third Rome’, with the Tsar considered the ‘heir to the legacy of Rome and Byzantium’ and ‘could be approached only in an attitude of fervent devotion.’6 Thus this clear religious orientation was key in determining the legitimacy of the tsar during that period. His divine image placed him at the center of the concept of ‘empire’; an empire built on strong religious foundations, in which there was no disassociation between the temporal and the spiritual realm. Furthermore, it was this Christian Orthodox foundation that brought new parts of the empire under Russian influence. The establishment of monasteries between 1552 and 1652 in news areas under the tsar’s control helped to imprint a Russian Orthodox identity on the space that had been conquered. 7 Romaneillo summarizes Orthodoxy’s importance, stating: “Muscovy could have an Orthodox tsar as the charismatic symbol of the state, leading a territory filled with diverse peoples, languages, cultures and religions.”8 Moreover, the realm displayed a clear hostility toward the presence of foreigners, which was in contrast to the ideological stance of Peter. Russian culture was protected from external influence through strict controls promulgated by the central power of the Orthodox Church. Such strict controls that appeared to characterize the pre-Petrine Muscovite era is highlighted by Tsar Alexis’s decree in 1675 in which he stated: “Courtiers are forbidden to adopt foreign, German (inozemskikh i nemetskikh) and other customs, to cut their hair on their heads and to wear robes, tunics and hats of foreign design, they are to forbid their servants to do so.”9 Evidently the Muscovite empire prior the reign of Peter the Great reflected a deeply religious,

Marc Raeff, Understanding Imperial Russia: State and Sovereignty in the Old Regime (Colombia University Press USA, 1984) p.2 Raeff (1984) pp.4-5 7 Matthew Romaniello, Mission Delayed: The Russian Orthodox Church after the Conquest of Kazan (Church History. 76 (2007), Nr. 3, pp. 511-540) pp.521-523 8 Matthew Romaniello, The Elusive Empire: Kazan and the Creation of Russia 1552-1671 (Univeristy of Wisconsin Press USA, 2012) p.23 9 “Tsar Alexis Decree of 1675” cited in: Lindsey Hughes, Russia in the Age of Peter the Great (Yale University Press USA, 1998) p. 5
6 5

3

James Crarer 12EUC709 - The Russian Empire internationally isolated empire. With this contextual appreciation in mind, the question to pose for the next section is how did Peter the Great’s reforms transform this traditional concept? It can be argued that the key point in understanding this transformation is to appreciate how Peter changed the ideological image of himself as ‘Tsar’ to ‘Emperor of Russia’. Through this appreciation of Peter’s own philosophical lenses through which he viewed his own rule, one is able to gain a greater understanding of how this view resonated through his reforms, which ultimately transformed the concept of the empire. To begin with it is important to assess how his western image was shaped. As Shaw highlights, Peter’s exposure in his early life to such people as the Swiss Franz Lefort and the Scot Patrick Gordon, meant he was exposed to the ideas of a European world alien to most seventeenth century Russians from a young age, therefore imprinting a western perspective on him that made him think and behave in a manner unconventional by Russian standards.10 In addition much of the historical literature on him suggests that he was a hugely practical man of action. Benedict Sumner accentuates this by suggesting that as a boy he was ‘gifted with exception physique, keen intelligence, great powers of observation and a good memory’11; and then at the end of his reign how he was ‘above all a great man of action’ and how as a ruler he possessed both an ‘inquisitive mind and impetuous temperament.’12 This attitude is substantiated when one considers the trips that Peter made during the 1690s, in particular 1697–1698 to England where he worked as a shipbuilder, meeting technicians, scientists and other practical men to whom he recruited into his plan of modernizing Russia. 13 Moreover his appreciation of European modernization is substantiated further as he is reported to have stated: “The English island is the best and most beautiful in the world.”14 Such admiration is supported further by the work of Vladimir Matveev, who emphasizes a close relationship between Peter and the British monarch William III. Their first meeting was held at Utrecht and it is suggested that the key consequence was William III’s ‘de facto recognition of Peter I's desire of 'Enlarging' his 'Dominions'’,

10 11

Shaw (1996) p.162-163 Benedict Sumner, Peter the Great and the Emergence of Russia (The English Universities Press London UK, 1968) p.22 12 Sumner (1968) p.208 13 Shaw (1996) p.163 14 ‘Peter the Great quote’ Cited in: Robert K. Massie, Peter the Great (Ballantine New York, 1981) p.216

4

James Crarer 12EUC709 - The Russian Empire considered to be the first form of support of Russia’s imperial ambitions by a western ruler.15 Such recognition highlights how Peter’s image as a worldly, progressive emperor, rather than a backward and isolated Muscovite tsar, substantiates the influence his image had on transforming the concept of the Russian empire. Furthermore, through the subsequent meetings between the two monarchs, and Peter’s meetings with members of the English political elite, the tsar formed ‘a more or less comprehensive perception of English society and politics’ particularly with regard to how the government apparatus operated, how it was administered and organized.16 Thus, this arguably was a direct influence on Peter’s ‘General Regulations’ of 1720, which were considered to embody the administrative precepts and notions of modern politics and thus guiding Russian bureaucratic practice.17 Moreover, this close relationship between the two monarchs is accentuated by Matveev, citing a letter between John Ellis to Joseph Williamson on 8 February, which stated: “The Czar has been several times privately to wait on his Majesty's at Kensington … His Majesty intends to give him a Garter before he goes away, there being two to be disposed of, by the death of the King of Sweden and the Earl of Peterborough.”18 Arguably, what these points emphasize is Peter’s yearning for not only knowledge of European concepts and practices of rule, but also a wider desire to gain acceptance and acknowledgement of Russia from the western powers. These external influences arguably shaped the nature of Peter’s identity, the basis of his reign and thus the development of his image of the tsar into Emperor of Russia. Moreover, the traditional notion of the tsar as representing a ‘divine’ ruler appears to have been rejected by Peter, transforming the religious character of supreme power within the Russian empire. As Raeff suggests, “the administration ceased to play a religious role, whereas the church was required to take an active part in temporal life. In the place of the most pious tsar, we find the sovereign emperor,

Vladimir Matveev, Summit diplomacy of the seventeenth century: William III and Peter I in Utrecht and London, 1697–98 (Diplomacy & Statecraft, 11:3, 29-48, 2000) p.38 – URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09592290008406168 - (Date Accessed May 10, 2013) 16 Matveev (2000) p.40 17 Raeff (1984) p.44 18 Letter between John Ellis and Joseph Williamson February 8, 1698 - cited in: Matveev (2000) p.40
15

5

James Crarer 12EUC709 - The Russian Empire wearing a European-style military uniform, residing in the western extremity of his empire.”19 In addition to this, he still remained at the head of the church, and as emperor he remained the head of the state, enshrined in his Table of Ranks of 1722 that established social and legal relations in imperial Russia.20 This break from the empire being based upon the notion of politics and religion occupying the same ideological space is a fundamental element of how Peter’s reforms not only transformed the nature of empire but also in terms of this changing image of him as a ruler. The widespread reorganization that Peter strove for within the government, military and society all highlight this ambition of his to detach Russia from a past that reflected a lack of cohesion and organization, which inevitably gave rise to notion of an ‘empire by accident’. His frequent encounters with westerners, provided the basis for the image of a modern, militarized and autocratic empire to him. A key element of his military reform was his transformation of the nobilities military service into officialdom, as Raeff suggests: “Nobles became functionaries responsible for carrying out tasks assigned to them by the state or its ruler and intended to ensure optimal exploitation of all available resources.”21 Arguably, such explicit reorganization of the noble class represented a conscious desire to maintain a strong level of autocratic control over the nobility, thus further substantiating his own supreme power within the Russian empire. This argument is substantiated well by Lindsey Hughes who highlights the clear disparity between the portraits of Tsar Alexis – which present a ‘static figure, the Holy Orthodox tsar clad in cumbersome robes of state, and the majority of those of Peter that represent the image of the Emperor and ‘soldier, surrounded by military and naval symbols.’22 Such disparity within this imagery thus highlights the clear significance of this ideological shift in the nature of the ruler and thus the influence this then had in the transformation of the concept of the Russian empire. What is evident from these various points is the clear significance of the development of Peter’s image as Emperor from what had been traditionally associated with passive, isolated and

19 20

Raeff (1984) p.47 ibid. p.41 21 ibid. p.44 22 Hughes (1998) p.63

6

James Crarer 12EUC709 - The Russian Empire deeply religious previous rulers. His image represented an enlightened ideological shift, away from these traditional presumptuous ideas of the Russian ruler, and toward a modern and westernized image. Moreover, placed a top of the social strata, it set the precedence for the reforms that ultimately shaped the new concept of the Russian Empire. To conclude and with these factors in mind, one must again pose the question: “In what ways did Peter the Great’s reforms transform the concept of the Empire?” In answer to this question it is evident that the reforms played a key role in westernizing elements of the empire and therefore transforming its tangible nature, influencing particularly the external perception of Russia. However, as has been highlighted, the key point is that it was Peter’s image as Emperor of Russia that was fundamental in instigating this transformation. It is therefore the view of this writer that without this concerted ideological shift about the nature of the ruler himself, the reforms would never have come to the fore. Peter’s own influence was then fundamental in transforming the concept of the Russian empire.

Word Count: 2,227

Bibliography
Howe S., ‘Empire: A very short introduction.’ Oxford University Press, 2002. Hughes L., ‘Russia in the Age of Peter the Great.’ Yale University Press USA, 1998. Massie R., ‘Peter the Great.’ Ballantine, New York 1981.

7

James Crarer 12EUC709 - The Russian Empire Matveev V., ‘Summit diplomacy of the seventeenth century: William III and Peter I in Utrecht and London, 1697–98.’ Diplomacy & Statecraft, 11:3, 29-48, 2000. URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09592290008406168 - (Date Accessed May 10, 2013)

Oxford Dictionaries, ‘Definition of Transformation.’ Oxford University Press April 2010. URL: http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/transformation - (Date Accessed May 09, 2013) Raeff M., ‘Understanding Imperial Russia: State and Sovereignty in the Old Regime.’ Colombia University Press USA, 1984. Romaniello M., ‘Mission Delayed: The Russian Orthodox Church after the Conquest of Kazan.’ Church History. 76 (2007), Nr. 3, pp. 511-540. Romaniello M., ‘The Elusive Empire: Kazan and the Creation of Russia 1552-1671.’ Univeristy of Wisconsin Press USA, 2012.

Shaw D., ‘A strong and prosperous condition.’ — the geography of state building and social reform in Peter the Great’s Russia.’ Political Geography 18, 991–1015, 1999. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629899000347 - (Date Accessed - May 3, 2013)

Shaw D., ‘Geographical Practice and its significance in Peter the Great’s Russia.’ Journal of Historical Geography, 22, 2, 160-176, 1996. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305748896900110 (Date Accessed - May 3, 2013)

Sumner B., ‘Peter the Great and the Emergence of Russia.’ The English Universities Press London UK, 1968.

8

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Peter The Great: Peter The Great

...Many historians describe Peter I as an outstanding politician, a bright mind, fair and democratic king, whose reign was so eventful and contradictory, that became the subject for the huge number of scientific works, popular science and fiction. At the time, even the cult of monarch was created. Personally, I think that Peter the Great was a very ambitious man and everything what he has done for his country just proves it. From the book by Foyanov; History of from ancient times to the beginning of XX century (История от древнейших времен до начала XX века): «…не впадая в преувеличения, надо видеть, что Петр был суровым, жестоким человеком. Характеристику Петра можно закончить его портретом, который донес до нас датский посланник: "Царь очень...

Words: 1348 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Peter the Great

...Peter the Great Introduction about Peter the great… Peter the Great ,Peter Peter l or pytor Alexeyevich Romanov ruled the tsardom of Russia and later the Russian Empire from 7 May [O.. 27 April] 1682 until his death , jointly ruling before 1696 with his half –brother… Life of Peter the Great… Peter the Great was born on June 9th, 1672 and he was from Moscow and he died February 8th, 1725 Saint Petersburg. He have six kids and their names are... Alexe, Tsarevich, Duke, Anna, Elizabeth, Duchesse. Peter full name is: Peter Alekse Tevich Roman and the parents that gave him his name is :{ MOTHER} Alexis l Russia and his {FATHER} Natalia Naryshkina… and his {SISTER} Sophia Alekseyevna … h The Early Life of Peter the Great From the early years of Peter the Great… Peter the great education was put in the hands of several tutors most notably Nikitia Zotov, Patrick Gordon and Paul Menesius. On January 29th 1676 Tsar Alexis died, leaving the Sovereignty to Peter’s elder half-brother the weak and sickly Feodor lll. Throughout the period the government was largely run by Artamon Matveev , an enlightened friend of Peter’s dad Alexis , the political head of the Naryshkin family and one of Peter’s......

Words: 520 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Peter the Great

...Peter the Great By: Sundeep Vaswani Pyotr Alexeevich, or Peter I the Great, was born on May 30, 1672 to Tsar Alexi the First and his second wife Natalya Kryillovna Naryshkina. He started out sharing ruling power with his half-brother Ivan, and gained full power to the throne when he was 24. Peter the Great was a good ruler because he tried to modernize, or westernize, Russia with his government, military and domestic reforms, even though some of these reforms stuck when he died. Peter thought that the government was in a dire need of reform. He tried to reform all aspects of the government, from local government, to the provincial government, all the way to the central government (Site 4, Paragraph 1). He first started with the local government. He tried to limit the power of the provincial government by letting the towns elect own officials, collect revenue and stimulate trade. The towns were governed by the elective board, which replaced the old system of sheriffs. (Site 4, paragraph 2). To improve the provincial government, Peter, in 1702, divided Russia into 8 guberniia, which was led by a gubanator, who had full power of his own guberniia and had to answer to Peter. Each guberniia was then broken down into districts called uzeda. By 1718, the number of guberniia increased to twelve and was broken down into forty uzedas. (Site 4, paragraph 3). When it came to the central government, he had a council, which was broken down in 40 departments. However, this system......

Words: 905 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Peter the Great

...Peter the Great was one of the most famous czars in Russia, ruling from 1689 through 1725. Born in Moscow on June 9, 1672, Peter the Great was able to accomplish the incredible task of modernizing Russia. Due to his amazing talents, Russia was one of Europe’s leading countries during his reign. From wars to the multiple reforms he made, Peter the Great was able to successfully meet his primary goal: to expand and westernize Russia. Without him, Russia would have continued to be isolated and old-fashioned compared to the rest of Europe. Peter the Great’s interest in war was greatly beneficial to Russia. Through most of the wars that Peter was involved in, he was able to acquire and create features that helped Russia prosper. For example, from 1700 through 1721, Russia was involved in its first major European conflict, the Great Northern War. As a result, Peter the Great had to make multiple preparations. He needed troops for his army, this meant that all of the new soldiers had to be trained and armed. A fleet for the Baltic and Black Seas was necessary when looking for a victory. These ships needed Muscovites, who needed special training, to sail them. Once accomplished, Peter the Great was able to defeat Charles XII of Sweden in Ukraine. Through the Peace of Naystadt in 1721, he acquired the Baltic coastline. It was there that Peter planned to open warm water ports. These ports led to a growth in manufacturing through the companies created by the state (Jay 1). Then in......

Words: 926 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Peter the Great to Lenin

...Peter the Great Reforms Russia: A DECREE ON A NEW CALENDAR, DECEMBER 20, 1699, ed., Peter Stearns, et al., Documents in World History, Volume II. The Modern Centuries: from 1500 to the Present (New York: Harper and Row, 1988), 32-33. New Calendar from Polnoe Sobranie Zakonov Russkoi Imperii (Complete Collection of the Laws of the Russian Empire), 1st series, Vol. 3, No. 1736, pp. 681-82. Peter the Great Reforms Russia: DECREES ON THE DUTIES OF THE SENATE, ed., Peter Stearns, et al., Documents in World History, Volume II. The Modern Centuries: from 1500 to the Present (New York: Harper and Row, 1988), 33. Duties of the Senate from Polnoe Sobranie, Vol. 4, No. 2321, p. 627 and No. 2330, p. 643. Peter the Great Reforms Russia: DECREES ON CONPULSORY EDUCATION OF THE RUSSIAN NOBILITY, JANUARY 12, AND FEBRUARY 28, 1714, ed., Peter Stearns, et al., Documents in World History, Volume II. The Modern Centuries: from 1500 to the Present (New York: Harper and Row, 1988), 33-34. Compulsory Education from Polnoe Sobranie, Vol. 5, No. 2762, p. 78 and No. 2778, p. 86. Lenin and the Russian Revolution: OUR PROGRAMME (1899), ed., Peter Stearns, et al., Documents in World History, Volume II. The Modern Centuries: from 1500 to the Present (New York: Harper and Row, 1988), 123. V.I. Lenin, Selected Works (New York: International Publishers, 1971), p.33. Lenin and the Russian Revolution: PROCLAIMING THE NEW SOVIET GOVERNMENT (NOVEMBER 1917), ed., Peter Stearns, et al., Documents in......

Words: 1486 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Peter the Great V.S. Catherine the Great

...Essay: Peter the Great v.s. Catherine the Great Peter the great first took to the throne in 1682 as a ten-year-old boy. Though he lacked proper education at first, he soon gained knowledge and set his sights for modernizing Russia. His ideas, however, were difficult to express, therefore he soon became an autocrat. He gained control over everything from the Russian Orthodox Church to boyars, or landowning noblemen, forcing them into various positions as civilians or military personnel. Forcing the boyars to shave their beads, change their style of clothing and allow women into their parties didn’t please them, however the boyars’ lands and servants were protected by Peter. Peter also ushered in a new generation in academics, creating better education systems and creating more academies. He also fixed up the roads, waterways and canals to help with his modernization of Russia. (Ellis & Esler, 168-169) Though his ideas proved to be good ones, he had a terrible tolerance for rebels, often torturing them and displaying their corpses on the outside of his palace walls. His army became the largest in Europe, he “Built a world-class navy from scratch,” and sought to extend the borders of his kingdom. He fought against the Ottoman Empire to gain a route for trade with the west that wouldn’t freeze over, but suffered defeat at their hands. ( Ellis & Esler, 169-170) Peter’s army went to war with Sweden in 1700, again suffering many defeats, but finally nine years later he won......

Words: 511 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Using These Four Passages and Your Own Knowledge, Assess the View That Russians Opposed Peter the Great Mainly Because the Pace of Change Was Too Rapid.

...Russians opposed Peter the Great mainly because the pace of change was too rapid. Pares, in an attempt to support the argument, says ‘it was not so much what Peter did that gave shock to the Russian consciousness but in which he did it and the pace it was done’ He expresses the idea that if change to modernise Russia was introduced at a slower rate people would be less likely to oppose. There is evidence that gives credit to Pares argument is that Peter tried to introduce a wooden plough with iron edging, but the peasants wanted to carry on the slash and burn method that they had been using for generations. Pares enhances his own interpretation because he writes ‘by racing against the wind as Klyuchevsky puts it, Peter increased the velocity of the wind against him.’ This enhances his argument because it proves that the faster he moved with the change the more opposition he would face. (Evidence) In passage B, Lisk contradicts Pares because she believes that it does not matter how fast the change came the country would always oppose it. She writes ‘Peter ordered that no serf could leave his masters estate without written permission’ the peasants would always oppose this because they would not like being treated as the property of their master.(evidence) Lisk supports her earlier statement that ‘the situation of the peasants in Russia grew worse and the gulf between the classes even wider’ the noblemen would not oppose this because they would become even more powerful and......

Words: 878 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Absolute Rulers

...Over the course of history many leaders have managed to build up and break down their country through the process of trial and error. An Absolute ruler is someone who has complete power and control over anything that has to do with to his territory. Two good examples of these kinds of rulers are Peter the Great ofRussia and Louis XIV of France. Peter the Great of Russia is a great example of an absolute ruler. Peter theGreat came into power and he was in complete control of every bit and piece of Russia. Peter wanted to form a road from Russia to the West. This road is something that would help Russia in many different ways to transport good and people, but he wasn't always helping. After Peter went to war with Sweden he lost the first time. After his defeat he built another army a new and more efficient army. This was the downfall to his rule because he didn't think about the immense loss Russia had faced with that defeat. Peter was too focused on going to war again. Being blinded by this defeat making him want to fight more was not the right move. Russia before this war had no military except the inefficient & shady Streltsky . After he died Russia had a professional military. Peter also built a Navy from the ground up. At the same time him beingblind and hungry for war made him unaware to what Russia needed for the creationof a large middle class. King Louis XIV of France was another example of an absolute ruler because hewent out to obtain anything that made him and......

Words: 547 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

History

...because of his terrible deeds * When he was persuaded to come back into ruling Russia he told them that he would, but under his conditions * Worst failure: (failed to protect Russia) * Was so focused on his outer enemies that he didn’t see the Tzar Mongols invade Moscu (the Tzars ended up burning Moscu) * They prophesized that he was gonna die in a specific day and month (***and he did *** when he was playing chess he got a stroke in the chest and died) 7. 1598-1610- Confusion! No clear succession 8. 1613-1645- Mikhail Romanov (Romanov Dynasty Begins!) 9. 1645-1676-Alexis Romanov rules… 10. 1676-1682- Fyodor Romanov rules… 11. 1682-1725- Peter the Great rules… Tresky (the royal army that had helped Peter) Peter the great was crazy (el del tin nervioso, played war...

Words: 1467 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Russian Reforms

...could attack from the Black Sea. As with any monarch, reforms came from whom the ruler was but the reforms that the Russian people needed and paved the way to modernization first were the ideas of Peter the Great, expanded upon under Catherine the Great, and materialized during Alexander II’s wearing of the crown. First notion to mimic western cultures first came to pass during Peter the Great reign. Already established as a great land empire, Peter I did not changed ruling policies of past emperors. He did add changes in economy and culture by benchmarking western innovations. Peter’s first major change was in his military structure. Peter recruited bureaucrats from outside of the aristocracy. This led to the creation of his secret police force which kept the aristocracy in check. Peter the Great also created the Imperial navy; the council of nobles was disbanded and replaced by provincial governors that Peter was able to control. The tax system was reformed to place more burdens on the serfs. Serfs began to work in the manufacturing industries and operations. Peter decreed that nobles had to have shave beards and dress in western style. Finally, Peter attempted to invest in his countries future by promoting mathematics and technical subjects. After Catherine the Great took control, she centralized government authority by using the Pugachev peasant rebellion. Although she was...

Words: 1644 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Student

...like to bully a boy named Peter Watson. They give Peter a hard time and put him through many dangerous ordeals. Characters There are three main characters in The Swan: Ernie, Raymond, and Peter. Ernie is portrayed as an evil and cruel boy who treats everyone badly and as an extremely violent person. Raymond is portrayed as cruel, like Ernie. Peter is portrayed as a boy who does well in school, and enjoys nature. Peter is also quiet and polite, loves music, and plays the piano well. He is also brave. Plot The Swan is a short story about Ernie and his friend Raymond who like to bully Peter Watson. Ernie gethis fifteenth birthday. His dad tells him to go kill some rabbits for supper. Ernie agrees, goes outside, and whistles for his friend Raymond to come outside. Raymond comes and they both shoot birds while heading to the rabbit field. When they get to the railway line they see Peter Watson, a boy whom they often bully. As a joke, Ernie and Raymond go over to Peter and point the gun at him and say, “Hands up!” Then, Raymond decides to tie Peter up on the railway tracks. Miraculously, Peter survives when the train comes over him by sinking into the ballast just barely enough so the train won’t hit him. Next, the two boys decide to throw Peter in the lake with his hands still tied. When they get to the lake, Ernie spots a duck on the lake and decides to shoot it instead. After he kills it, he orders Peter to go and fetch it. Peter does this unwillingly......

Words: 587 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Catherine the Great

...Paper Catherine the Great Catherine II was originally born Sophie Augusta Fredericka in 1729. She was born to a noble family in and raised in Germany then call Prussia. She was born a princes and was raised as such. Sophie was considered as an immensely beautiful princes. However her family was considered as minor and as poor by royal family standards. What they did have was an important connection to the Russian Empire. Sophie left for Russia in 1744 to meet Empress Elisabeth at the age of 15. As with most princesses of the time she was married off to increase political and family ties. In Sophie’s case this was to Peter III. Grand Duke Peter was the nephew to the Empress and heir to the throne of Russia. Other than meeting Empress Elisabeth and Peter III her childhood was relatively dull. The first time Sophie met Peter she was not fond of him. She described him as being “small and infantile and talked about nothing but soldiers and toys”. He was far too childish for her. In addition Peter would drink in excess at the mere age of 16. Although she disliked him, Sophie’s marriage to Peter was her first step in becoming Catherine the Great. She unlike Peter immediately immersed herself in the Russian culture. She also converted from German Lutheran to Eastern Orthodoxy and thus she was reborn and renamed Catherine. Catherine was an intellect who learned the Russian language swiftly. The newlyweds were nothing alike. Even on their wedding night Peter stayed up all night......

Words: 2783 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Crash

...thief, named Peter Waters. As Tom Hansen was driving down the highway he spots Peter, a stranger to him at the time, walking. He then pulls over to see where Peter was going and offers him a ride. Once Peter gets into Tom's car you can tell first impressions were being made due to stereotypes. The stereotyping against one another is their mistaken beliefs about people; especially in this case about the different race (Sole, 2011). In the car Tom is listening to country music, which is stereotyped to be what Caucasian people like to listen to and so when Peter snickers and makes mention that the music was good, Tom assumed he was being mocked at. Due to Toms first impression of Peter, later Peter laughed again when he saw Toms Saint Christopher on the dash because he carries one in his pocket but Tom doesn't know this. Tom then really thinks he's being mocked at and ask him angrily to get out of his car. However, Peter really wanted to show him why he was laughing and how they do have a common interest that what stereotype made them out to be. So when he reached into his pocket to show him Tom hasty decision was that Peter was going to pull out a weapon and instead pulled out his gun and shot Peter in what he thought at first was self defense till he saw what was really in Peters hand. After this scene I could not help but wish if only he didn't judge so quickly on Peter. Predetermining someone can have its negative outcome at times, much like characters Tom and Peter. ......

Words: 572 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Northern Eurasian 1500-1800

...came from Manchuria and came into power and later ruled the Qing dynasty • Dutch East India company- a charter private company that controlled trade for china • Kangzi- A child Chinese emperor , did major expansion in china’s borders, gained control of the government , centralized government • Qing Technology-Introduced new ways to draw maps, created European calendar, worked in astronomy and anatomy • Canton system- a way for china to control trade, they did not allow ships to come in , closed off every port , left only one city port (Canton) open • Macartney- British ambassador that demanded china to open up their ports , he failed though • Environmental Stress- caused by population growth and • Muscovy- Area that surrounds the great city of Moscow • Tsar(Russian equivalent to emperor ,dictator)Ivan Iv -Ivan the fourth was also known as Ivan the terrible- first emperor of the Muscovy region • Siberia- Northern area of Russia , had very valuable...

Words: 484 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Applied Research Technologies, Inc.

...bosses. Applied Research Technologies, Inc. Introduction The brief case given, Applied Research Technologies, Inc., displayed many characteristics of leadership styles. The main roles described were by the project manager, Peter Vyas, and his boss, Cynthia Jackson. Throughout the case, each of them experienced scenarios that exemplified their unique style. In the next couple of pages the specific course learning outcomes associated with the assignment described in the abstract will appear and in conclusion I will express my own style. In conclusion, I will describe one of my bosses that exhibited the same types of behaviors as Cynthia. Peter Vyas Peter Vyas displayed many leadership styles throughout his experiences. Upfront Peter knew how this project would affect his own personal credibility and that of the entire team, but knew his team had worked tirelessly to make this project a reality. The one that stood out mostly and caught my attention was that of the participative leadership style. Participative leadership style is described as seeking to involve other people in the process, rather than taking autocratic decisions. As further described, most participative activity is within the immediate team, which Peter displayed as well. There are different extremes to this spectrum of participative leadership that include: full delegation of decision to team, joint decision with team as equals, and team proposes...

Words: 1305 - Pages: 6