Premium Essay

Petty vs Metropolitan Gov't of Nashville

In: Business and Management

Submitted By mzruby
Words 466
Pages 2
Petty v. Metropolitan Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County

Strayer University
Business Employment Law
HRM 510
November 07, 2011

Petty v. Metropolitan Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County
What were the legal issues of this case?
The legal issues of this case are the employee is filing suit alleging racial discrimination under disparate treatment and disparate impact. Disparate treatment is intentional unequal treatment based on protected class characteristics that results in the limitation or denial of employment opportunity. Employer of any size prohibited from discrimination against people who are members of, or have obligations to serve in a uniform military service under the uniformed services Employment and Reemployment rights Act ( USERRA).
Explain how the r reemployment provisions of the USERRA were violated in this case?
Under the provisions of USERRA reemployment must occur within two weeks of the employee’s application for reemployment. However, Metro return-to-work process took three weeks to rehire. Petty’s complaint alleged that Metro violated his rights under USERRA in that: (1) Metro delayed rehiring him for the purpose of subjecting to the department return-to-work process; (2) Metro did not properly rehire him because he was not placed in the position to which he was entitled; (3) Metro impermissibly denied him the ability to work off duty security jobs.
Explain why the court concludes that Petty has a claim for discrimination under USERRA.
USERRA performed four key functions in this case that concluded a claim of discrimination. (1) It guaranteed returning veterans a right of reemployment after military service; however this should have occurred within two weeks, but took three weeks. (2) It prescribes the position to which such veterans are entitled upon their return never the less, Petty did not receive his former…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Code

...We’ll consider these reasons more extensively later in this book. For now, however, the most interesting reasons are those tied purely to commerce. 58 CODE 2.0 And, again, these commercial reasons are sufficient to induce the development of this technology. Once again, the gap in the data necessary to identify someone’s location is the product of the way IP addresses are assigned. IP addresses are virtual addresses; they don’t refer to a particular geographic place. They refer to a logical place on the network. Thus, two IP addresses in principle could be very close to each other in number, but very far from each other in geography. That’s not the way, for example, zip codes work. If your zip code is one digit from mine (e.g., 94115 vs. 94116), we’re practically neighbors. But this gap in data is simply the gap in data about where someone is deducible from his IP address. That means, while there’s no simple way to deduce from 23.214.23.15 that someone is in California, it is certainly possible to gather the data necessary to map where someone is, given the IP address. To do this, one needs to construct a table of IP addresses and geographic locations, and then track both the ultimate IP address and the path along which a packet has traveled to where you are from where it was sent. Thus while the TCP/IP protocol can’t reveal where someone is directly, it can be used indirectly to reveal at least the origin or destination of an IP packet. The commercial motivations......

Words: 190498 - Pages: 762