Free Essay


In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By k2skatest
Words 969
Pages 4
Symbolism of Movies
Parallels of Star Trek and World Religions

Live long and prosper

The new star trek is a long journey mainly on the focus of James Kirk and Spok. In the beginning they start out as opposites and in the end they end up as friends. Typical happy ending I know, but the interesting part is that I hope to show the links between Star Trek and World Religions, which I think are both good subjects to explore and correlate.
Buddhism, compassion, the middle way, logic instead of belief, going with the flow
Spock is buddhism

Hinduism vegas attman brahmin, James Kirk being part of a bigger Atman
James Kirk is Hinduism

at the end when the Romulans whom tried to destroy earth and destroyed the Vulcan planet we at their perril. Being the last ones of their kind about to be destroyed and suffer death, as a way to repair the relationship and “show compassion” Captain James Kirk offers to save them in the name of peace. This shows Taoism repairing relationships as well as ying and yang. One must be ying and not just yang for all to work. Had the Chinese leaders acted with more compassion or even with more yang relationships can be restored and flow.


Every part has a role, possibly equal and as important. Find the link.

Spoc always being logical, part human part vulcan, showing no emotion. His planet was destroyed by Romulans and showed no feedback, just like a robot. As his emotions came back he mentions his anger and how he is “emotionally something” aka he was angry and trying to controll his anger. Spocs character as in his personality is the definition of the opposites of being rigid to open (Taoism/confucianism, Buddhism). It is resolved by not trying to control his anger but to just let it be. As you said when we spoke, “that’s okay.”

I don’t really know native peoples and personally don’t really like it.
I think its about interconnectedness but I don’t really get what the interconnectedness is between the people.

As for native peoples, just look at the Pawnee quote again. The Pawnees work as a natural TEAM - and notice how many films have hero-teams that work together flawlessly, even in problem-solving (flawlessly doesn't mean there are no problems), because they are dedicated to each other and to something higher (even in the Star Trek film and earlier series). That should help.

Pawnees work as a natural team - work flawlessly, even in problem solving
Pawnees work as a natural team, which mean they operate flawlessly working for a higher power. Star Trek this did happen as the whole team. There were problems, James Kirk wears his emotions on his sleeve, doesn’t really always follows the rules, and is generally a very flexible thinking pertaining to the situation. Spok is a hybrid, vulcan personality is very rigid, sticks to the rules, very logical and thinks through things. When these two differing characters collide for in essence to take down the enemies they literally collide. But they both believe in a higher purpose and in normal circumstances they wouldn’t get a long but they do. It works out partially because Kirk is a decision maker (executive) but Spok picks the decisions and which ones will actually follow through so they both need each other, and both are just as important to the bigger picture of working as a team.
There are other aspects in this where Taoism comes into play. Spoc is naturally a very rigid character due to his Vulcan upbringing environment and just the way Vulcan teams would naturally function(as I would imagine). (Vulcans are all logical and uptight, they all go by the same rules). But then When Spok is thrown into a human atmosphere where compassion and emotion take over logic in some situations (humaness), is when Spok did not mesh with the human crews. Spoc made an executive decision to ex-communicate Kirk and did not even flinch emotionally which led to another character confronting Spoc as to showing no emotion to sending Kirk to a empty, freezing, unpopluated, planet. But the highlight of this is that, things just shifted for the purpose of the higher power and Spoc became more open ess rigid, more human I suppose. This led to the excellent team work of Spoc and Kirk infiltrating the enemy ship by themselves and defeating them.
These Pawnee concept is showed in Star Trek of interconnected in Star Trek as an example but happens everyday everywhere weather we realize or not. Dynamics of my dorm floor, sports teams, classes, ranging from anywhere of 2 people to a civilization. Although it’s not perfect meaning not everyones happy and not every gets what they may have wanted, but it works. But is it okay? If everyone does not get what they want but it still works? i think it this does work if everyone in the team ultimately is working for that common goal and will not mind sacrifices, but if its like a civilization like ours where there are tons of people and we’re living, some people are going to get stuck on the short side of the stick and not be happy about it. It happens all the time. So our civilization in some aspects can represent a lack of interconnectedness. Almost very individual and where there’s no sacrifice. Which may lead to people “suffering.” Why do people suffer? Is it a way of thought? Do they just not get what they want and as a result suffer (Buddhism). Ignorance..Or are there also because of the lack of interconnectedness people don’t really seem care, so people do get raped, get screwed over financially etc., basically inequalities. I don’t know..

Similar Documents

Premium Essay


...Tianna Dockett PHIL 101 Final Exam 1. Retributive justice is a legal principal that dictates that punishment for a crime is acceptable as long as it is a proportionate response to the crime committed. In this type of justice system, a crime is typically seen as being done against the state or government, rather than against an individual or community. The standard of fairness is likewise found in the thought of reasonable play. On the off chance that individuals accept that a reasonable procedure was utilized as a part of choosing what it to be dispersed, then they may well acknowledge an irregularity in what they get in correlation to others. 2.3. As a record of political association on the bigger scale, Plato's protection of a aristocratic government was unrealistic to win wide endorsement in fair Athens. He utilized the characters Glaucon and Adeimantus to voice pragmatic complaints against the arrangement. They are particularly concerned (as Plato's Athenian counterparts may well have been) with some of its procurements for the gatekeeper class, including the support of both men and ladies, the disposal of families, and the instruction of youngsters. Likewise, Plato accepted that the hobbies of the state are best saved if kids are raised and taught by the general public overall, instead of by their natural folks. So he proposed a basic (if startlingly new) plot for the reproducing, sustaining, and preparing of youngsters in the gatekeeper class.4. Using a...

Words: 1277 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Phil 201

...Stacy Mottola PHIL 201-D05 25NOV2013 Essay 1 Many question whether or not what we are seeing and are experiencing is real or just part of our imagination. This question is one that has been proposed for hundreds of years by philosophers like Descartes and Plato. How is it possible that a Greek philosopher, a philosopher from the seventeenth century and the movie The Matrix can be so similar? It is the intent of this paper to compare and contrast these questions in relation to the movie The Matrix. The main thing that stands out for each one of these is the question of the reality of the world in which we live. Our sense of being is called into question in each of these examples. Are our senses correct or are we simply living in a dream world that is made up? The Matrix is a computer system that has taken control of peoples everyday lives. Each individual is hooked up to this computer that generates a dream world where everyone believes that they are actually living a realistic life. In the Matrix Morpheus a leader of a group of people who have rebelled against this system come to the knowledge that they are not living real lives. In his recruitment Morpheus meets with Neo and attempts to show him the truth. Learning this Neo sees that what you can see, touch and feel are not exactly real, their senses have betrayed them. In the excerpt from Descartes he makes several statements which also question the reality in which our perceptions believe we are......

Words: 755 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Phil Essay

...PHIL 1F90: Spring 2011. Second Essay Question ONE (to be answered as a straight-forward philosophical essay): Silenus, the satyr, is, or perhaps pretends to be, a determinist. After all, everything about the satyr, both his nature and nurture, come directly from his creator, Hench. And certainly, at the beginning of the story, Hench accepts full responsibility for the satyr’s actions. But he eventually changes his mind. How can the satyr, all of a sudden, become morally responsible for his actions? What exactly changed in Hench’s thinking? Michael Gorr is a compatibilist. Does his position make better sense than either the determinist or the libertarian? Explain. Question TWO (to be answered as a philosophical essay but with your auto-biography as illustation): “There is little wonder that Silenus, the satyr, is a determinist because everything about him, that is, both his nature as well as his nurture, were outside his control. He had absolutely no say in the matter. But, when I think about it, this is equally true of me as well. How do I, as a human being, differ from the satyr (except for the half-goat, half-man part)? After all, I am nothing more than the causal result of my nature in combination with my nurture and therefore, just like the satyr, I too am not responsible for who I am, what I do, or even what I think. If everything about me is caused and outside my control, then I cannot really be free or morally responsible. I could not have done...

Words: 699 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Phil 201

...COURSE SCHEDULE PHIL 201 Textbooks: Dew & Foreman, How Do You Know? A Short Introduction to the Issues of Knowledge (unpubl.) Evans, Philosophy of Religion: Thinking About Faith (2009). Foreman, Prelude to Philosophy: Critically Thinking about Foundational Beliefs Hasker, Metaphysics: Constructing a World View (1983). Holmes, Ethics: Approaching Moral Decisions (2008). Wood, Epistemology: Becoming Intellectually Virtuous (1998). WEEK/ MODULE READING & STUDY ASSIGNMENTS POINTS DUE DATE 1 3/17-3/24 Foreman: chs. 1-3 3 presentations 3 study guides Course Requirements Checklist Class Introductions Quiz 1 0 0 60 Wed,3/19 Mon,3/24 Mon, 3/24 2 3/25-3/31 Foreman: chs. 5-7 2 presentations 3 study guides Quiz 2 60 Mon, 3/31 3 4/1-4/7 Hasker: chs. 1-3 1 Word document 4 presentations 3 study guides Group DB Forum 1 Quiz 3 100 60 IP Fri, 4/4 R Mon, 4/7 Mon 4/7 4 4/8-4/14 Dew & Foreman: ch. 3 Wood: chs. 1-2 3 presentations 3 study guides Quiz 4 60 Mon, 4/14 5 4/15-4/21 Dew & Foreman: chs. 7, 10 Wood: ch. 4 1 Word document 2 excerpts 3 presentations 3 study guides Essay Quiz 5 120 60 Mon, 4/21 Mon, 4/21 6 4/22-4/28 Evans: chs. 1-3 1 book excerpt 2 presentations 3 study guides Quiz 6 60 Mon, 4/28 7 4/29-5/5 Evans: ch. 7 Holmes: chs. 1-3 1 article 2 presentations 3 study guides Response Paper Quiz 7 200 60 Mon, 5/5 Mon, 5/5 8 5/6-5/12 Holmes: chs. 4-7, 14 1 presentation 3 study guides Group DB Forum 2 Quiz......

Words: 349 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Phil 201

...Tiffany Tyree Phil 201 Individual Project 2 Thursday, April 16, 2015 Metaphysics Study of Existence What's out there? Epistemology Study of Knowledge How do I know about it? Ethics Study of Action What should I do? Politics Study of Force What actions are permissible? Esthetics Study of Art What can life be like? Metaphysics: ◦What is real? What is real in life is what you make your life out to be yourself. Real is hugging your children and having the person that you love telling you that they love you for life? Real is the pain that you feel when you lose your brother and greave. You do not know if you will ever see this person again because you don’t know if there is a spirit world. ◦Is the physical world more or less real than the spiritual or psychological world? It’s hard to explain if the spiritual world or the psychological world are real or if it is just something that we have been lead to believe so we have spent years rolling over and over in our minds and made ourselves believe that it is real. From the time we are babies we are lead to believe that there is a heaven and angels and such. We are lead to believe in Santa and the tooth fairy and the Easter bunny, but who is to say that any of that is real except what we believe in our own minds and hearts. ◦Is there such a thing as a soul? If so, how does it survive outside of a physical body? I want to believe that there is such a thing as when we are buried that we have a soul that lives on in a......

Words: 1653 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Phil 201

...PHIL 201Response Paper Response to “On Being An Atheist” by H.J. McCloskey H.J. McCloskey attempted to contradict the arguments proving Gods existence used by theists in the article “On Being an Atheist”. Although there is no sufficient proof in the cosmological argument of their being a perfect creator, it does however provide evidence of a singular being. The evidence of an almighty creator is provided by the simple element of complex design. However, though this almighty creator allows the existence of evil in the world, He was not the one to create it, and, as such, has a purpose behind its existence. The existence of God can be logically concluded, contrary to McCloskey’s beliefs, using the philosophical inquiry. McCloskey refers to the cosmological, teleological, and design arguments throughout his article, and discuss how theists use them to prove the existence of God. McCloskey may, perhaps, believe that these arguments are unsuccessful because his different beliefs allow his approach to be different. Contrary to proof, these aspects of cosmological, teleological, and design are more accurately represented when used as evidence or as simply arguments. Dr. Mark Foreman describes proof, in his presentation of “Approaching the Questions of God’s Existence”, as something that involves a characteristic of complete certainty. As McCloskey refers to the many arguments as “proof” he implies that the arguments are thought to be facts of absolute truth. If this were......

Words: 1717 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Islamic Phil

...Muna Mohamed David G. Phil 1125 April 6, 2016 Any verbal denial of any principle of Muslim belief is considered apostasy. If one denies the unity of God or declares to a belief in reincarnation, then that person is guilty of apostasy. Apostasy means, to abandon the religion or a religious principle after accepting it. Moreover, Al-Ghazali was known as one the most influential thinkers in the history of Islam and his aim was to bring humanity closer to God. He was viewed as a faithful Asharite theologian in which one who believes that God is the only direct and indirect cause of actions. In this paper, we will examine Al-Ghazali’s reasons of the three teachings on which the philosophers are guilty of apostasy, and review ibn-Rushd’s defense of philosophy in the Decisive treatise, and decided whether ibn-Sina should be considered an apostate. Al-Ghazali illustrates three philosophical teachings that were apostasy and unorthodoxy. One of the first point is the philosopher’s belief in the eternity of the world. In other words, philosophers claim that the world is eternal and that the emanation of the first intellect and other beings happens because of the necessary causation of God’s essence, therefore the world as a whole is coexistent and coeternal with God. Ibn Sina believed that God does not have knowledge of the specifics of everything that takes place, rather he is is only aware of what takes place in the general sense. Ghazali replies to this saying that God’s......

Words: 790 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

What Should Phil Do

...Question # 1 - Did Phil commit plagiarism? If so, what did he do wrong, and how could he have prevented this problem? Yes, Phil did commit plagiarism. According to the Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism Policy, students are obligated to summarize, paraphrase, and use quotations to indicate that the content being used originated from another source. Phil failed to follow these guidelines when compiling his paper. Instead, he copied exact text without putting quotation marks around the material which is clearly defined as being dishonest. He could have prevented this problem by reading Professor Wemmick’s guidelines for the assignment before starting his paper which defines all aspects of plagiarism. If he took notes from the resources and then developed his own opinions instead of copying and pasting directly in his paper then he could have prevented this problem. In addition, Phil should have used quotes and cited the specific material he pulled from his resources. Question #3 - What are Phil's responsibilities? To whom is he responsible? What rules and guidelines should he follow? I agree with Trane that Phil was responsible for his work and allocated task within the assignment. To include submitting his paper in APA format and in accordance to Professor Wemmick’s guidelines. In addition, he was responsible for submitting his part of the assignment on time and without avoidable mistakes. I believe Phil could have avoided these errors by being organized and allocating......

Words: 577 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Phil 347 Week 1

...Case Study: Week 1 Franca Thomas PHIL 347: Critical Reasoning Professor Bret Fuller Chamberlain School of Nursing Case Study: Week 1 Identify the main point and the supporting points of each argument: 1. Throughout history, people have disagreed about moral issues.  This isn’t true about science, because science is objective, and people can come to objective agreements.  If morality is not like science, and science is objective, morality must be subjective.  Morality, then, is just a matter of opinion. Main point: If morality is not like science, and science is objective, morality must be subjective. Supporting points: Throughout history, people have disagreed about moral issues.  This isn’t true about science, because science is objective, and people can come to objective agreements. Morality, then, is just a matter of opinion. 2. We should help people that are starving in other countries.  We have plenty of things that we can share without adversely affecting our own lives, and we are morally obligated to help people who are less fortunate than us if we can do so without giving up anything of comparable importance to the aid that we are giving. Main point: We should help people that are starving in other countries. Supporting points: We have plenty of things that we can share without adversely affecting our own lives, and we are morally obligated to help people who are less fortunate than us if we can do so without giving up anything......

Words: 620 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Phil 111 - Affirmative Action

...Looking at Affirmative Action Timothy Eby Southern New Hampshire University Introduction to Critical Thinking PHIL - 111 Dr. Jean Suplizio October 11, 2015 Looking at Affirmative Action THESIS: Explore segments of the inherent disadvantages associated with affirmative action, as experience by non-minority college applicants. Present a relevant objection(s) and a response to the objection. DEFINITIONS: Affirmative action is defined as: “… programs required by federal statutes and regulations to remedy discriminatory practices in hiring minority group members; i.e. positive steps designed to eliminate existing and continuing discrimination, to remedy lingering effects of past discrimination, and to create systems and procedures to prevent future discrimination; commonly based on population percentages of minority groups in a particular area. Factors considered are race, color, sex, creed, and age. National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation, 306 U.S. 240” (Black, 1990, p. 59). An additional definition can be found in the widely accepted Random House law dictionary: “… any step by a public or private employer, school, institution, or program, beyond the mere cessation of intentional discrimination, to promote diversity, provide opportunities, and alleviate the effects of past discrimination on the basis of race, sex, national origin or disability” (James, 2000, p. 20). REASON # 1: Colin Powell, the 65th United States Secretary of...

Words: 1677 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Phil 201 Essay

...Phil 201 6/14/15 Comparisons of The Allegory, Descartes and The Matrix While in the reality of his world, the main character of The Matrix, Neo finds himself doubting what really is and really isn’t. The writers of The Matrix did an excellent job of drawing similarities to that of Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” and Descartes’s Philosophical ideas. There are many similarities between the Allegory as well as to the Philosophical differences to The Matrix. The first major similarity that I noticed between the Allegory and The Matrix is the fact that both Neo and the character in Plato’s work had a feeling that something was not right. The both seemed to want to gain a deeper knowledge of the world around them and believed the world was not all it seemed but that it was more than what it seemed. They believed there was a deeper meaning to what was around them. They both accepted this and began the search for deeper meaning. This allowed both Neo and the slave to understand that they are not really in control of their world. At any moment something could change. In Neo’s case the computer programmer could change a code and have a building fall on him or possibly make someone disappear from his life. In the slaves case his life, since he was born, was ran by the farmers that he worked for within the cave. Their lives are very similar. Neo, even though he did not realize it was in the same position as the slave. He was a slave himself. The differences between The Allegory and...

Words: 643 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Business Ethics Phil 320

...Topics for Consideration Paper I Phil 320 1) Business or corporate leaders charged with unethical practices may (and often do) rightly point out that everything they did was perfectly legal. They broke no laws. Does that mean that their actions are necessarily ethical? What is the difference between a law and an ethical decision? 2) To what extent is the ‘free’ market at all compatible with moral considerations? (This, like almost all meaningful questions, is not going to be an either/or kind of thing.) Should we view business enterprises as bound by ethical obligations in the same way that we feel those obligations as individuals? Or is it legitimate to view commerce as operating largely independently of moral considerations? 3) How far should an individual’s responsibility extend? With the development of new technologies in transportation and communication, we are more aware of the consequences of our choices in faraway places than ever before. A truly rigorous stance would lead to absurdly paralyzing situations. Owning a car, buying affordable clothing, or just eating many foods (practically all), could be seen as ethically dubious. And yet it is often the case that we avoid certain businesses if we know that they treat their employees unfairly. How do we draw the line? 4) The same question (as above) can be asked of corporations. For example, Peter A. French argues that “corporations should be treated as full-fledged moral persons” with “whatever......

Words: 306 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Phil 2001 Hw1

...PHIL 2001: Homework 1 1. Explain the Hobbesian state of nature and why life is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short"? Provide a short (1-2 paragraph) critique of this view. The Hobbesian state of nature is how Hobbes believe mankind would operate without any form of government. This state of nature is incredibly tumultuous, dangerous, and volatile. In Hobbes opinion, humans are naturally prone to conflict. Hobbes also believes that humans are all created equal both intellectually and physically, which contributes to this conflict. Since they are all equal, no one possess enough power to keep them in “awe”. It is for these reasons that Hobbes believes life is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short”. I disagree with Hobbes regarding his ideas that everything a man does benefits himself in some way. We can see this time and time again in human nature. A great example of this is when people donate a kidney to a loved one. They gain nothing from this, but are still more than willing to do it. This selflessness is so engrained in us, it can even be seen in our movies and TV shows. The classic scene where someone jumps in front of a bullet to save their friend has been acted out hundreds of times. Another point of contention I have with Hobbe’s view of the state of nature, is his idea that a strong ruler must exist to swiftly punish those who defect from the state. I favor Rousseau’s view that this harsh ruler is not necessary because people will not naturally want to......

Words: 1254 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Response Paper Phil 201

...A Response to the Article: "On Being An Atheist" by H. J. McCloskey Joshua Cottrell PHIL 201-D32 Professor Pensgard August 12, 2013 The belief in a Creator and a literal God has been a subject of many arguments down through the centuries. Despite a written record and a large contingency of believers, there has arose a strong group of people who believe there is no God and that man just happens to exist and that there is nothing beyond this life. In 1968 H.J. McCloskey published an article entitled "On Being an Atheist". He argued that theories such as the Cosmological or Teleological arguments did nothing to prove in his mind the presence of God. He strongly believed that evil further cemented the idea that a righteous God did not exist. With his writing he attempted to empower the atheist and once and for all prove that God did not exist. I. "Proofs" McCloskey indentified theistic arguments for God as "proofs", and in so doing opened himself up to much scrutiny. He quotes a colleague as saying "...most theists do not come to believe in God by reflecting on the proofs, but to come to religion as a result of other reasons and factors." I do not believe that his colleague was referring necessarily to Cosmological or Teleological arguments as "proofs", as McCloskey ends of doing. I believe his associate was merely stating that most people do not come to religion because they see the sky and think there must be a Creator. There are a number of......

Words: 2242 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Phil Study Guide

...Phil 4 Midterm Study Guide Introduction: - Ontology is the study of being, kinds of things that exists, the different kinds of being. What is ultimately real? - Material: spatial/public/mechanical - Immaterial: nonspatial/private/teleological - Materialism: Matter is truly real and immaterial things are not - Idealism: Ideas are ultimately real - Dualism: Reality is both material and immaterial - Monism: There’s one single reality Lau Tzu (Laozi): - Taos analogy to water: water takes all shape, water doesn’t compete, it does nothing yet there’s nothing it can do, takes no form, all forms can be taken. - Taos analogy to uncarved block: un-carved block is preconceived, preconceived thoughts/values makes it harder to respond to present situations. - Taos analogy to valley spirit and the female: nonbeing “spirit of value with divine female”. Value -> space-> spirit -> life. Life fills empty space. Always allows for nonbeing. - The Tao that can be told of not the eternal Tao because the name that can be named is not the eternal name. - The Tao is the source of all reality because “The nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth and The Named is the mother of all things.” - The saying there is a doing that comes from not doing is when the action emerges from you instead of it being something that you think about. Plato: - Form is immaterial reality - The divided line represents B as the highest point in the scale of reality, A being the lowest......

Words: 844 - Pages: 4