Free Essay

Philosophy of Religion

In: Other Topics

Submitted By dukeNukem
Words 1759
Pages 8
Introduction

Philosophy of religion is a branch of philosophy concerned with questions regarding religion, including the nature and existence of God, the examination of religious experience, analysis of religious vocabulary and texts, and the relationship of religion and science. It is an ancient discipline, being found in the earliest known manuscripts concerning philosophy, and relates to many other branches of philosophy and general thought, including metaphysics, logic, and history. Philosophy of religion is frequently discussed outside of academia through popular books and debates, mostly regarding the existence of God and problem of evil. The philosophy of religion differs from religious philosophy in that it seeks to discuss questions regarding the nature of religion as a whole, rather than examining the problems brought forth by a particular belief system. It is designed such that it can be carried out dispassionately by those who identify as believers or non-believers.

Religion: A Part of Metaphysics

Philosophy of religion has classically been regarded as a part of metaphysics. In Aristotle's Metaphysics, the necessarily prior cause of eternal motion was an unmoved mover, who, like the object of desire, or of thought, inspires motion without itself being moved. This, according to Aristotle, is God, the subject of study in theology. Today, however, philosophers have adopted the term philosophy of religion for the subject, and typically it is regarded as a separate field of specialization, although it is also still treated by some, particularly Catholic philosophers, as a part of metaphysics.
Questions Asked About Religion

Theologians, distinct from philosophers of religion, often consider the existence of God as axiomatic or self-evident and explain, justify or support religious claims by rationalization or intuitive metaphors. In contrast, philosophers of religion examine and critique the epistemological, logical, aesthetic and ethical foundations inherent in the claims of a religion. Whereas a theologian elaborates rationally or experientially on the nature of God, a philosopher of religion is more interested in asking what may be knowable and opinable regarding religion's claims.
Other questions studied in the philosophy of religion include what, if anything, would give us good reason to believe that a miracle has occurred, what is the relationship between faith and reason, what is the relationship between morality and religion, what is the status of religious language, and does petitionary prayer (sometimes still called impetratory prayer) make sense?
Going beyond metaphysics, the philosophy of religion also addresses questions in areas such as epistemology, philosophy of language, philosophical logic, and moral philosophy.
What Is GOD?

Among theists, some believe there is just one God (monotheism), while others believe in many gods (polytheism). Some Hindus have a widely followed monistic philosophy that can be said to be neither monotheistic nor polytheistic. Within these two broad categories (monotheism and polytheism) there is a wide variety of possible beliefs. For example, among the monotheists deists believe that the one God is like a watchmaker who wound up the universe and does not intervene further in the universe, and some theists believe that God continues to be active in the universe. Ignostics object that a coherent definition of God must be presented before the question of the existence of God can be meaningfully discussed.
Rationality of Belief

The second question, "Do we have any good reason to think that God does or does not exist?” is equally important in the philosophy of religion. There are several main positions with regard to the existence of God that one might take:
• Theism - the belief in the existence of one or more divinities or deities.
1. Pantheism - the belief that God exists as all things of the cosmos, that God is one and all is God; God is immanent.
2. Panentheism - the belief that God encompasses all things of the cosmos but that God is greater than the cosmos; God is both immanent and transcendent.
3. Deism - the belief that God does exist but does not interfere with human life and the laws of the universe; God is transcendent.
4. Monotheism - the belief that a single deity exists which rules the universe as a separate and individual entity.
5. Polytheism - the belief that multiple deities exist which rule the universe as separate and individual entities.
6. Henotheism - the belief that multiple deities may or may not exist, though there is a single supreme deity.
7. Henology - believing that multiple avatars of a deity exist, which represent unique aspects of the ultimate deity?
• Agnosticism - the belief that the existence or non-existence of deities or God is currently unknown or unknowable and cannot be proven. A weaker form of this might be defined as simply a lack of certainty about gods' existence or nonexistence.
• Atheism - the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
1. Strong atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.
2. Weak atheism is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist.
• Apatheism - the lack of caring whether any supreme being exists or lack thereof.

These are not mutually exclusive positions. For example, agnostic theists choose to believe God exists while asserting that knowledge of God's existence is inherently unknowable. Similarly, agnostic atheists reject belief in the existence of all deities, while asserting that whether any such entities exist or not is inherently unknowable.
Natural Theology

The attempt to provide proofs or arguments for the existence of God is one aspect of what is known as natural theology or the natural theistic project. This strand of natural theology attempts to justify belief in God by independent grounds. There is plenty of philosophical literature on faith (especially fideism) and other subjects generally considered to be outside the realm of natural theology. Perhaps most of philosophy of religion is predicated on natural theology's assumption that the existence of God can be justified or warranted on rational grounds. There has been considerable philosophical and theological debate about the kinds of proofs, justifications and arguments that are appropriate for this discourse.
The philosopher Alvin Plantinga has shifted his focus to justifying belief in God (that is, those who believe in God, for whatever reasons, are rational in doing so) through Reformed epistemology, in the context of a theory of warrant and proper cognitive function.
Other reactions to natural theology are those of Wittgensteinian philosophers of religion, most notably D. Z. Phillips. Phillips rejects "natural theology" and its evidentialist approach as confused, in favor of a grammatical approach which investigates the meaning of belief in God. For Phillips, belief in God is not a proposition with a particular truth value, but a form of life. Consequently, the question of whether God exists confuses the logical categories which govern theistic language with those that govern other forms of discourse (most notably, scientific discourse). According to Phillips, the question of whether or not God exists cannot be "objectively" answered by philosophy because the categories of truth and falsity, which are necessary for asking the question, have no application in the religious contexts wherein religious belief has its sense and meaning. In other words, the question cannot be answered because it cannot be asked without entering into confusion. As Phillips sees things, the job of the philosopher is not to investigate the "rationality" of belief in God but to elucidate its meaning.
Analytic Philosophy of Religion

As with the study of ethics, early analytic philosophy tended to avoid the study of philosophy of religion, largely dismissing (as per the logical positivists view) the subject as part of metaphysics and therefore meaningless.The collapse of logical positivism renewed interest in philosophy of religion, prompting philosophers like William Alston, John Mackie, Alvin Plantinga, Robert Merrihew Adams, Richard Swinburne, and Antony Flew not only to introduce new problems, but to re-open classical topics such as the nature of miracles, theistic arguments, the problem of evil, the rationality of belief in God, concepts of the nature of God, and many more.
Plantinga, Mackie and Flew debated the logical validity of the free will defense as a way to solve the problem of evil. Alston, grappling with the consequences of analytic philosophy of language, worked on the nature of religious language. Adams worked on the relationship of faith and morality. Analytic epistemology and metaphysics has formed the basis for a number of philosophically-sophisticated theistic arguments, like those of the reformed epistemologists like Plantinga.
Analytic philosophy of religion has also been preoccupied with Ludwig Wittgenstein, as well as his interpretation of Søren Kierkegaard's philosophy of religion. Using first-hand remarks (which would later be published in Philosophical Investigations, Culture and Value, and other works), philosophers such as Peter Winch and Norman Malcolm developed what has come to be known as contemplative philosophy, a Wittgensteinian school of thought rooted in the "Swansea tradition" and which includes Wittgensteinians such as Rush Rhees, Peter Winch and D. Z. Phillips, among others. The name "contemplative philosophy" was first coined by D. Z. Phillips in Philosophy's Cool Place, which rests on an interpretation of a passage from Wittgenstein's "Culture and Value." This interpretation was first labeled, "Wittgensteinian Fideism," by Kai Nielsen but those who consider themselves Wittgensteinians in the Swansea tradition have relentlessly and repeatedly rejected this construal as a caricature of Wittgenstein's considered position; this is especially true of D. Z. Phillips. Responding to this interpretation, Kai Nielsen and D.Z. Phillips became two of the most prominent philosophers on Wittgenstein's philosophy of religion.

The Problem of Discussing Religion

Religion is a difficult subject to discuss since it would be difficult to be objective about because it is such a personal topic, meaning subjective claims are always expressed. An Objective claim to test the existence of a supernatural all powerful deity/deities would be the law of non-contradiction meaning that such a belief is either real or imaginary.[20] Due to the fact, that there cannot be a middle ground between the two possibilities of existence versus non-existence. This means that a Supernatural all powerful deity/deities can only be real or imaginary, not both. Throughout articles Authors would start with an objective claim and relate them back to validate their individual subjective claim. Furthermore this could explain the obvious bias illustrated throughout this page. Elaine Howard Ecklund, Ph.D. survey of 1700 natural and social scientists in the university environment shows fifty- four percent of university scientists claim that Religion in the Academic life would be dangerous if it went wrong, particularly in the science department. She concludes her article with her difficulty with the upbringing of religious studies, as the director of the religion and public life program at Rice University.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Religion Nd Philosophy

...human life.  The MAN’S WAY OF LIFE FROM SECULAR VIEW  Separation between religion and other aspects of life,  Materialistic,  Individualistic,  Less socio-economic justice,  Less public relations,  less concern with the Hereafter life. 6 INCEIF MAN’S WAY OF LIFE IN ISLAM Belief in a dual worldviews: this world & the hereafter.  Religion is part of his/her daily life.  Maslahah of the ummah (public benefit),  Accountability,  Trustworthiness,  Transparency etc.  7 INCEIF WHY ALLAH (SWT) CREATED MAN? INCEIF 8 CONT. WHY ALLAH CREATED MAN?.  According to Islamic belief, Allah has created man (and jinn)only to worship Him. INCEIF  The word worship here encompasses all permissible human activities and intentions as part of the general act of acceptable worship (ibadah). Within the ambit of the Shari’ah, a man’s entire life is an act of worship; as such, his choice must either follows the commands of Allah (including commercial transactions) or ignores them for his 9 self-interest.  MAN’S CHOICE IN AL-QURAN ْ ‫ﻻ َ إ ِﻛ ْﺮ َ اه َ ﻓ ِﻲ اﻟﺪ ﱢﯾﻦ ِ ﻗ َﺪ ْ ﺗَﺒ َﯿ ﱠﻦ َ اﻟﺮ ﱡ ﺷ ْ ﺪ ُ ﻣ ِﻦ َ اﻟ ْﻐ َﻲ ﱢ ﻓ َﻤ َ ﻦ ْ ﯾ َﻜ ْﻔ ُﺮ‬ َ ‫ﻄ ﱠﺎﻏ ُﻮت ِ و َ ﯾ ُﺆ ْ ﻣ ِﻦ ْ ﺑ ِﺎ ﱠ ِ ﻓ َ ﻘ َﺪ ِ اﺳ ْ ﺘَﻤ ْ ﺴ َ ﻚ َ ﺑ ِﺎﻟ ْ ﻌ ُﺮ ْ و َ ة ِ اﻟ ْﻮ ُ ﺛ ْ ﻘ َﻰ ﻻ‬ ٌ ‫اﻧ ْﻔ ِﺼ َ ﺎم َ ﻟ َﮭ َﺎ و َ ﷲ ﱠ ُ ﺳ َﻤ ِﯿﻊ ٌ ﻋ َ ﻠ ِﯿﻢ‬ INCEIF There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right path has becomedistinct from the wrong path. Whoever......

Words: 1880 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Philosophy Religion Essay

...Philosophy of Religion Essay: Religious experience at Ram Mandir Hinduism is one of the oldest religions since the beginning of time and has grown from its ancient roots to become the third largest religion in the world. The majority of its followers originate in India and Nepal. Hinduism is a religion based on traditional values and philosophies that have evolved in India over period of more than a thousand years. On my visit to the Ram Mandir while I experienced a puja, “which is a name for prayers in Hinduism”. (V,2011) among the people, I noticed two different patterns that they follow, and observed that Hinduism has related the patterns to Emilie Durkheim’s and Stuart Hall’s theories of social solidarity and culture respectively through use of prayers and congregations, which is going to be the main focus of my essay in Hinduism the distinct patterns while performing the prayers. The two patterns are congregation who came together for the ritual performed by the Pundits( priests) and the book that priest themselves distributed to the people. The first pattern that was visible to me in the Ram Mandir was based on the congregation who came together for the ritual performed by the Pundits (priests). This gathering of people had a majority of Asian descendants which were mostly North Indians that spoke Hindi. Also, there were different languages that were being spoken by south Indians that are dark skinned, which were easy to distinguish. Since, Hindi is the most......

Words: 1703 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Philosophy and Religion

...Albert Rosales Professor: Gill Intro Philosophy: 213 In writing this paper, I was apprehensive by the immensity of the task that was required of me, having never studied Philosophy and philosophers before this class and not having a good understanding of it. I could not begin to comprehend Metaphysics, Ethics Epistemology etc. if it was not for this course. This may sound ignorant but I had never really given any thought to my worldview. If asked what I believed about something I would give my belief and that was that. What exactly is a worldview? A worldview is what it sounds like. It is the way one may see the world or as Nash puts it in his book Life’s Ultimate Questions “the sum total of a person’s answers to the most important questions in life(392).” Everyone has a worldview whether we realize it or not. How does one get their worldview? Our education, our upbringing, the culture we live in, the books we read, the media and movies we watch, all can help shape our worldview. Nash says, “Worldviews contain at least five clusters of beliefs, namely, beliefs about God, metaphysics (ultimate reality), epistemology (knowledge), ethics and human nature (14).” Using these five sections I will share my worldview. In general my worldview is a Christian one. I believe that there is one God who exists in three forms who created the Heavens and the earth. In the Bible Genesis 1:1 tells of how God is the beginning of everything; he created the heavens and the earth out of......

Words: 2495 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Philosophy

...Andrade 1 Andrew Andrade Mr. Barker Philosophy 101 9 February 2011 Word count: 2049 PHILOSOPHY Many people believe that philosophy is a subject meant for those who are lost in life. Its actually the opposite those who do not study philosophy are lost in life. In our everyday lives philosophy can be applied from our hygiene to our relationships. It is based on the questioning of every aspect of life to better gain an understanding of it. The better understanding of something can allow us to change the bad for the better or add to the good if need be. The big questions in philosophy are about the existence of god, our own existence, morality, ethics, reality, life’s meaning, and knowledge. All question have an ultimate goal to end pain and suffering whether it be in life or death. There have been many philosophers who believe that they have figured out the solution to suffering in life and death. They came up with guidelines and philosophies that would help people to be good morally in turn be good for all of mankind. Siddhartha Gautama, K’ung-fu-Tzu, and Lao Tzu all believed that their own ways were the most effective. Buddha was born into a royal family who believed in the traditional teachings of the Hindu religion. It involved reincarnation, karma, Brahmin priesthood, sacrificial system, and the caste system. With god and goddess, the better you do in a previous life the better your next life......

Words: 2117 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Philosophy of Religion - Eternal Damnation

...Question 4 Based on the traditional view of eternal damnation, everyone is judged upon his or her death. The judgment one receives is based on the choices they make throughout their life. If they make the right choices, they will be rewarded with entrance into Heaven to live alongside God. If they make the wrong choices, however, they are damned to Hell to suffer eternally. The problem with this view of eternal damnation is that the determining factors are seemingly unfair. Without enough epistemic facts, one is forced to choose between various different religions and beliefs, some of which revolve around God, some of which don’t. Even deciding not to make a choice is making a choice – a choice not to believe in God. This traditional view creates two problems: (1) that God delivers unjust punishments to those who choose to sin, regardless of how little evidence they have about what choices they should make, and (2) that God may be unloving of his subjects. Seeking to defend the traditional view of eternal damnation, Murray evaluates two models of hell that Christians commonly endorse, which he calls the penalty model and the natural consequence model. As he analyzes objections to each model, Murray concludes that the best defense for the traditional view of eternal damnation is a combination of the two, a hybrid model. The penalty model presents an idea that all humans who are guilty of sin must pay a penalty, and so are punished with spiritual death. However, since Jesus...

Words: 1330 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Philosophy

...Read chapter. 1 of Philosophy of Religion: Thinking About Faith, “What is Philosophy of Religion?” As you read, make sure you understand the following points and questions: Explain the distinctions between philosophy of religion and sociology, history, theology, and religious philosophy. philosophy of religion focus on the truth and reasonableness of religious beliefs. While the historian or sociologist may study religious beliefs, but his focus is not specifically on the truth or reasonableness of such belief theologian looks at religous beliefs from within, as an adherent or representative of a religous tradition. philosophy of religon may be engaged in by thinkers who are not religous at all, as well as by committed religous thinkers philosophy of religion not so much religious thinking as it is thinking about religion. Religious Philosophy is Religious thinking Explain the arguments for and problems with fideism. Fideism: human beings are never religously neutral; they are always either in faithful service to or in rebellion against God. Claims that faith is the precondition for any correct thinking about religion Problem: fideist cannot attempt to win over his critics by rational argument as the presupposition of such dialouge means the possibility of common ground (fideists deny common ground) eliminates the possibility of showing the nonbeliever the superiority of a religous worldview where should one place one's faith? What 2 factors do Evans and Manis...

Words: 299 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Philosophy of Religion

...Plato Review Plato’s distinction between body and soul in the foundation unit so that you can make comparisons with the thinking of Hick and of Dawkins. John Hick Philosophy of Religion (1973); Death and Eternal Life (1976) • The soul is a name for the moral, spiritual self formed by the interaction of genes and environment. The human is a psychophysical person with a divine purpose. • The person shall be resurrected through a divine act of recreation or reconstitution in resurrection, rather than reincarnation as Plato would have it, through God’s creative love. • The new body is not the old one brought back to life but a spiritual body inhabiting a spiritual world just as the physical body inhabited a physical world. • Hick conducts a thought experiment with a hypothetical person called John Smith. Smith disappears from the USA and reappears in Calcutta, India. He is physically identical with the same memories, emotions, fingerprints, and so on. People would agree he was Smith. If he died and reappeared in this world, again identical, people would agree he was Smith. If he died and reappeared in another world with other resurrected people, he would be Smith. This is called the replica theory. • God is not restricted by death and holds man beyond natural mortality. • Martin Luther wrote: Anyone with whom God speaks, whether in wrath or mercy, the same is certainly immortal.’ Richard Dawkins The Selfish Gene (1976); River out of Eden (1986);The Blind......

Words: 601 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Philosophy and Religion

...concept of death life would be meaningless. “It is a common place, but an important one, that death and decay are the servants of life. Fallen leaves change into humus on which next year’s seedlings feed: so the death and transformation of autumn is essential to spring. Death is therefore a condition of life and constitutes half its rhythm” (Grayling 29). Different definitions of death had evolved. From the perspective of religion, Catholic, death started in the time of Adam and Eve when they have eaten the forbidden fruit at the Garden of Eden. And throughout the ages, different views had spread concerning death. Different religions, culture, vision, perspectives and others had given color to the meaning of death. For others, it is the path that connects two different worlds called life and “afterlife”; it serves as a punishment for those who violated the law, a threat to one’s existence and a way to attain either heaven or hell. These are just some of the existing concepts of human beings about the future event they fear and refuse to talk about. “Most religions premise an afterlife. Some of them teach that it begins with a judgment bringing punishment or reward… some people find such notions psychologically supportive, others find that they make death more terrible- for them death becomes a strange country ruled by dangerous powers, into which we venture ill prepared” (Grayling 31). Who is not afraid of death? “When I ask you what you are afraid of when I talk about......

Words: 2996 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Philosophy-Religion

...Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Does God exist? If so, why is there evil? Like St. Augustine, I do acknowledge that ``God exists”. In order to explain his ideology, Augustine refers to the life of a tree, rock, dog and human beings. He argues that among the things aforementioned, only human being posses the ability to think and act thus meaning that among the creations on earth, the human being is the intelligent creature. Further, he expounds his argument by stating that if another being is intelligently superior to human beings, then it has to be God. However, St. Augustine acknowledges the presence of evil. St. Augustine’s opinion of sin is linked to the freedom to exercise ``freewill” by individuals an aspect that results to ``moral evil”. Free will forms the basis by Augustine that God should not be blamed for ``the existence” of sin. To expound on his argument, Augustine informs his readers that he like many other people has been subject to sin due to his desire to realize what sin entails and urges the people not to dwell so much on sin rather than the existence of God(pg,164). In conclusion, I support Augustine’s argument that no one can understand the thinking of God thus we should focus on his goodness rather than sin existence. Are Human Beings Selfish? I believe that every ``human being” is selfish. The selfish nature of human beings is evident from the daily activities that we engage in during our lifetime and routines. In the current society, it is......

Words: 901 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Philosophy and Religion

...Philosophy and Religion are both things that are heavily discussed by individuals involved in the study of philosophy itself. There are many different opinions about religion and philosophy, because philosophy itself is something that can be seen from different variations. On one hand, there are those that are considered realists, and they believe that religion can indeed exist in the discussion of philosophy. On the other hand, there are those who are considered non-realists, and these individuals do not believe that there is any proof or evidence to show that religion actually exists. The arguments of realists versus non-realists are based on the fact that some people in philosophy are simply going to have a different opinion about different things. For example, in the world there are many people with different views about different things. One individual may feel that Jesus Christ is God, while another individual may feel that Buddha is their God. Different opinions are shared around the world every day, and the study of philosophy is no different considering that many philosophers have different opinions relating to the topic of religion and philosophy. According to Meister, logical positivism was something that was very popular in philosophy during the early parts of the twentieth century because many philosophers felt that actual logic, mathematics and statements that had proven to be factual were the only parts of philosophy that belonged in philosophy in general.......

Words: 1357 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Philosophy

...Everyone seems to have a philosophy on life – what would be the point of living everyday without some absolute, underlying purpose to existence? When there is an unknown in life, man manifests a comfort for the sole purpose of security. This has been true throughout time whether it be philosophies about nature, religion, etc. The fact is that we do not like having unknowns in our life; we don’t like having variables. Man has been engaged in a relentless pursuit of knowledge of himself and his surroundings from day one; we have made some incredible advances in science because of it. However, beyond the realm of science, mostly composed of hard facts and theories, there lies spirituality – why are we here? Who or what created us? Is there a God? What is the universe? What exactly is the human condition? And once these questions are answered, how should we live our lives? I only wish constructing a life philosophy was that simple; these questions have tormented man interminably and without a shred of relief. It is an endless game, coming up with the answers, and is often comprised of one step forward and two steps back. It is also equally difficult for me to put together a life philosophy because I am only sixteen years old. Only after seventy or so years of experience, can one accurately assess what he has learned along the way. Life continues to present itself to me as ambiguous as an E.E. Cummings poem, as random as the ocean waves. However, in this essay I will attempt...

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Philosophy of Religion

...RST3709 Assignment 1 Write an essay on the God of the philosophers. Who or what is God according to traditional Classical philosophy? Refer in your answer specifically to Plato and Aristotle’s objective idea of God. Also refer to Augustine’s response to Classical philosophy. Conclude your essay with your own critical assessment. Do you agree or disagree with the philosophers? Use Chapter 4 of your prescribed textbook (‘The God of the Philosophers’) in order to answer the question. Contents 1. Brief summary of the God of the philosophers 2. The traditional God and gods 3. Plato and Aristotle’s objective ideas of God 4. Conclusion 5. References 1. Brief summary of the God of the Philosopher: In the book ‘God: A guide for the perplexed’ Keith Ward goes into fascinating debate and detail of ancient philosopher, their writings and the way the world understood them. Each philosopher mentioned in Chapter 4; Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Augustine had their own image and debate on what the godswere and how they perceived them and how they believed they came to be and what they are capable of. Plato, when learning about the Greek gods, never understood why they were there or where they came from. He believed that good was the only essence that mattered in all the beliefs and religions and ways of life. He believed in a god that was faultlessin everything he did and that is why the universe was created. (Ward 2002: 145) Socrates on the other......

Words: 831 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Philosophy of Religion Wk 5

...Information from the following three articles will help you with this essay assignment. From Theoretical to Practical: Developing Tillich's Apologetics by Wendy Morrison found at: http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/lumenetvita/article/view/1700/1547 And The God above God found at http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2011/04/god-above-god.html You might also want to look at: The webpage http://www.quodlibet.net/articles/smith-tillich.shtml contains the article What Is Faith? An Analysis of Tillich's 'Ultimate Concern' Write an essay of 500-600 words explaining Tillich's concept of faith. Be sure to include explanations or answers to each of the following issues. Use examples to strengthen your explanations. 1) What does it mean to say that a living being is concerned about something? 2) What is an ultimate concern? What is the relationship between how a person lives her life and her ultimate concern? 3) Can we be mistaken in our faith? What are the consequences of such mistaken faith? 4) How does Tillich describe God? 5) Discuss one important contrast you noticed between Tillich's ideas about faith and the ideas about faith usually found in the church. Here is a good way to complete the assignment. Take notes for your answers to the questions 1-4. Write up your answers in paragraph form - one for each topic. Use the topics you considered for 1-4 and to help you answer number 5. You will get more points for explaining things in your own words....

Words: 252 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Philosophy vs Religion

...FirstName LastName Instructor’s Name Course Name Due Date (01 January 2000) Title of Paper Begin your paper here. Your first paragraph should introduce your topic and give the reader an overview of what you plan to discuss. Don’t skip lines between paragraphs or hit enter after each of your lines. Word will do this for you. Be sure to indent your first line of each paragraph a ½ inch (use the Tab key). There shouldn’t be any information in the rest of your paragraphs that isn’t mentioned in your introduction here. After your introduction, you will need body paragraphs to support your topic. The number of body paragraphs you have will depend on the amount of information you have to cover. Be sure to check the minimum length of the assignment to ensure you have met the minimum requirement. If your paper requires outside sources, “You will need to include quotes like this” (LastName 99). You can also include paraphrases of someone else’s work, as long as you cite the information in the same way (LastName 22). Remember that Wikipedia is never a reliable source! Anyone can go to Wikipedia and edit the information there. While the information there might be true, it might also be totally incorrect. Since it isn’t a reliable source, it should not be used as a source in academic writing. However, a good Wikipedia article should have outside sources listed at the bottom. If you follow those links, you should get access to more reliable sources. Your last paragraph......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Philosophy of Religion

...The Cosmological argument argues for the existence of God a posteriori based on the apparent order in the universe. For Aristotle, the existence of the universe needs an explanation, a cause, as it could not have come from nothing. Nothing comes from nothing so since there is something, there must have been some other thing that is its cause. Aristotle rules out an infinite progression of causes, so, that led to the conclusion that there must be a First Cause. Likewise with motion, there must have been a first cause; Aristotle calls this the ‘Prime Mover’. There is a God, says Aristotle -for how else does motion begin? Whilst this argument does generally offer some support for the existence of God, it does not prove his existence. Aquinas believed that, since the universe is God's creation, evidence of God's existence can be found in his creation using intellect and reason, as such a concept of God is beyond all direct human experience. Hence, he devised his 'Five Ways,' 5 a posteriori arguments for the existence of God, based on our empirical experience of the universe. The Cosmological argument rests on the first three of Aquinas' Five Ways. The first way is called the argument from motion or ‘change’. It is in this first way that Aquinas follows Aristotle’s ‘prime mover’ thesis. The first way (The 'Kalam' argument) follows as: • Everything in the world is moving or changing • Nothing can move or change by itself • There cannot be an infinite regress of things changing......

Words: 949 - Pages: 4