IBO Final Exam Winter 2011 (Yuriy Pylypchuk)
2. FTPR & FFPR – Ukraine & Poland | Economic size | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | | | | | USD | % | USD | % | USD | % | USD | | | Ukraine | Nominal GDP | 137 000 000 000,00 | 0,042 | 131 477 927 063,34 | -0,151 | 154 862 104 903,82 | 0,024 | 151 232 524 320,13 | FTPR | 0,729 | Poland | Nominal GDP | 469 000 000 000,00 | 0,038 | 451 830 443 159,92 | 0,016 | 444 715 003 110,16 | 0,051 | 423 135 112 378,84 | FTPR | 0,732 |

| External position USD | | | | Total assets | Total liabilities | Summarizing | | | Ukraine | 90 318 000 000,00 | 117 017 000 000,00 | 207 335 000 000,00 | FFPR | 1,371 | Poland | 156 877 000 000,00 | 398 212 000 000,00 | 555 089 000 000,00 | FFPR | 1,312 |

In accordance to Rabobank annual report I have calculate needed ratios.
Ukraine - FTPR = 0,729; FFPR = 1,371
Poland - FTPR = 0,732; FFPR = 1,312
The indicator FTPR displays the amount of balance imports and exports to GDP.
Having analyzed the calculated parameters can be noted that in times of crisis to develop the country with almost the same pace, FFTP shows that the growth of Ukraine and Poland in the international arena is virtually identical at 0,73.
Before the crisis, Ukraine kept a clear and logical foreign policy and external balance followed the import and export. But as we have developed historically in Ukraine are all accustomed to trade, rather than invest in new areas, increasing the production of domestic goods. Most imported goods and imported to this day (the majority of imports falls on product range made in Poland).
If we consider the dynamics of the GDP of both countries, it is clearly seen that the crisis in Poland in 2008 was able to survive and also to increase their performance can not be said about the Ukrainian economy.
With regard to FFPR indicator, we can say that it shows