Free Essay

Plea Insanity

In: Other Topics

Submitted By miap
Words 1941
Pages 8
The “Insanity” Plea

The “Insanity” Plea
A criminal defendant who is found to have been legally insane in the course of committing a crime is relieved the criminal responsibility by the virtue of suffering from a mental disease (Findlaw, 2015). In some cases, the accused may be sentenced to a less severe sentence or punishment after being found on the wrong side of the law because of the mental impairment. Many nations allow the insanity defense in their legal systems. However, the accused must prove to the court that they were not on their senses or acted upon uncontrolled impulse or some variety of these factors when doing the wrongful doings. The general sense of insanity plea is to provide the alleged perpetrator of the criminal offense a fair trial. The society is even in agreement with this principle in extreme cases. Nonetheless, the major challenge falls on where to draw the line. That is, the circumstances where one can be considered insane and instances when he or she is not. It is worth noting that, no matter how appealing the crime itself is, it doesn’t demonstrate the level of insanity.
Today, the legal systems use way too much of the insanity defenses. While there are many questionable defense tactics, insanity plea targets to protect the rights of the accused and further the course of justice. This paper discusses the insanity plea as used in the legal systems in the present times.
What is the main purpose of insanity plea? How did it find its way past the corridors of justice to the courtrooms? Well, insanity plea found its place in the legal system after the courts found it really difficult to identify those who were truly insane. It was found to be fair for the mentally ill persons to have the insanity defense because their mental capacity differs from that of the sane and healthy individuals.
The history of the insanity defense dates back in the 16th-century. Traces of its recognition was first recorded in 1581 in an English legal treatise that stated if a lunatic, a natural fool or a madman killed someone in the course of his or her lunacy, they would not be held accountable (Findlaw, 2015). In the 18th-century, the courts in Britain came up with a “wild beast” test whereby the defendants could not be convicted if their understanding of the crime was not better than that of the wild beast, brute or an infant. In Hebrews, during the ancient times, the law stated that the children under a specific age, lunatics as well as the idiots were not be held responsible after having committed a criminal offense.
While the terms such as the wild beast and lunatic are no longer used in courts today, the current laws give room for the insanity defense to follow the same logic. The insanity plea was codified into law in Britain in the midst of the 19th-century. The M’Naughten Rule that is used in many states in the U.S. as well as in many countries around the world is enforceable today (Findlaw, 2015). The insanity plea was conceived when Daniel McNaughten tried to assassinate Robert Peel, the British Prime Minister in the year 1843. He instead killed the secretary to the prime minister but he was declared not guilty by the court. The U.S. criminal justice system accepted the insanity plea after the trials.
Test for Legal Insanity
Various ways can be used to test for legal insanity depending on the jurisdiction. Courts may choose to use one of the tests or combine them to check for legal insanity. The M’Naghten Rule as mentioned earlier is one of the tests. In this case, either the defendant did not distinguish between right and wrong because of the mental illness or didn’t understand his or her actions. The second test is the Irresistible Impulse where it takes note of an existence of a mental disease that made the defendant not to control his impulses leading to the criminal act. The other test is the Durham Rule that doesn’t take note of the clinical diagnosis but accepts the criminal act was committed out of the defendant’s mental illness. The last test is the Model Penal Code. The test follows that since the defendant is diagnosed with a mental illness, he or she was unable to understand the acts were criminal offenses or was incapacitated to act according to the law.
Trial Procedure
The defendants have to communicate to the prosecutors before the trial that they have the intentions of relying on the insanity defense. Normally, the prosecutors and the defense attorney will both obtain their psychiatrists to carry out an examination of the defendant (, 2015). They are also to testify during the trials. For the destitute defendants, the judges appoint the psychiatrists that are paid by the government to examine them. Here the actual burden lies on the defendants to convince the judges through the use of clear substantiation that the accused was mentally ill at the time of committing the offense. The rules concerning the evidence forbids the psychiatrist of the defendant from testifying or giving his opinion about the defendant being mentally ill or insane at the time the offense was committed. The rules only allow them to give a medical diagnosis regarding the mental illness of the defendants.
One would think that if a defendant is declared not guilty by the court, then he is set free but that is rarely the case. The defendants are always taken to the mental health institutions where they are confined (, 2015). Surprisingly, the are even confined for a longer time than the one they could serve if found guilty and sentenced. The courts may as well rule that the defendants stay put in the mental institutions until the judge is convinced that they are legally insane anymore.
Myths about Insanity Plea
There have been many myths about insanity plea that has claimed that insanity defense lets criminals get away with the crime. It has also been thought that it is a lame excuse for grave crimes and, therefore, should not be considered in the trials. In many criminal cases more so in murder trials, the defendants to avoid and escape death penalty or life sentences use insanity defense as a strategy. Many of the crime perpetrators found not guilty on the grounds of insanity are taken to the mental health institutions but are released sooner than they would have spend in prison if they were found guilty of the offenses. In reality, the defendants escape punishments that befit their committed crimes.
Conversely, research has dispelled the myths that claimed insanity plea and defense enables criminals to get away with the crimes and releases the crime perpetrators back to the streets too soon (, 2015). The research has shown that the insanity defense offered by the defendants is just about one percent of the total felony cases. Again, their success rate is very minimal at about a quarter of the total. On the other hand, contrary to the popular opinion, the defendants who are declared not guilty on the grounds of insanity are always confined for many years in the mental institutions. In some instances, the period is even more than the one that they could serve had they been found guilty and sentenced. In addition, the same research concluded that very few defendants fake to having been insane while the majority that are found not guilty because of insanity had a clear mental illness and a long history on the same.
Pros and Cons
While a coin has two sides, insanity plea has both benefits and weaknesses. On the positive, it creates a guilty atmosphere since for it to work; the defendants must admit that the crime was committed although the defendant did not commit it on purpose. The other pro is that the insanity plea can save a life in the event the offender committed a crime and he is mentally ill then he can be saved by the defense. Considering that all the capital crimes are punished by a death sentence, the mentally ill offender is excused from the capital punishment. Since no one wishes to be ill, and the fact that the crime was committed under the inability to detect what is wrong and right, lenient sentencing is done. The leniency in the charges can be a likely acquittal and even a no jail term.
On the cons of insanity plea, it is abolished in various jurisdictions and that is to say, it is not accepted in every court. This arises the need to have the case transferred, which again is nearly impossible. Insanity defense also comes with increased trial costs. The defense will have to hire specialists to do the examination and evaluation on the defendant so as to determine the level of mental incapacity. While a majority of the offenders will push for a standing plea, still many will be found able to stand trial. The juries and judges have become extra mindful because the insanity plea has been abused in the past. The plea can be either accepted or rejected and thus there is no guarantee.
Need for Insanity Plea
While the insanity plea rarely happens in the criminal trials, it is still a controversial subject. The public as well as the legislators questions why a defendant would be found not guilty in a murder case on the grounds of insanity (, 2015). For instance, when president Ronald Reagan was shot by Hinckley so as to make an impression on actress Foster, there was a civic uproar. There were concerns about the need of the plea. However, from both the medical and legal perspectives, there have been varying opinions about the insanity plea. Some wish to have it retained while the others object. In my view, I think it is important to have it given that the plea results from the bargaining pleas whereby even the prosecutors do agree that the pleas are appropriate sometimes. It also makes sense to respect the rights of the mentally ill individuals.
The idea of having the insanity plea is to give the society a sense of protection although it does not give the defense an ideal solution. There have been a number of ways through which the society and the legal systems in the past dealt with insane individuals who committed crimes. While there are several techniques for the determination of the legal insanity, they only serve as guidelines, and thus it is difficult to reveal what the alleged criminals think about. All in all, what matters most is that the commission of a crime is wrong whether the perpetrator was healthy and normal or mentally ill and unstable. I suggest that the insanity plea remains in action since the felons that are mentally ill deserve some special treatment. While it causes a lot of controversy and challenges, a fair trial is passed to the mentally ill felons.

References,. (2015). Pleading Insanity Defense: Mentally Ill Criminal Defense | Criminal Law. Retrieved 1 December 2015, from,. (2015). Insanity Defense Facts, information, pictures | articles about Insanity Defense. Retrieved 2 December 2015, from
Findlaw,. (2015). Insanity Defense - FindLaw. Retrieved 1 December 2015, from
Lilienfeld, S., & Arkowitz, H. (2011). The Insanity Verdict on Trial. Scientific American Mind, 21(6), 64-65.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Insanity Plea

...Deadly Deceivers: Why criminals shouldn’t be able to plea insanity Just imagine for a second this scenario. Its premier night for the most anticipated movie of the year “The Dark Knight Rises” and you’re finally making it into your seat after standing for about an hour outside the theatre. The lights dim as the movie starts, and bang! A guy busts through the door fully armed and starts firing into the seat. Seventy people are injured, twelve of them die. The man responsible for this crime is currently on trial, and has the chance to be acquitted because he plans on pleading insanity. Prosecutors in this case proclaim: This just allows the defense to think through how they want to proceed…That makes it easier for the defense to plan its best case. Holmes could plead insanity and would wind up in a mental hospital indefinitely – and would never face execution, if the jury finds in his favor (Campbell). This would not be fair to the people who were injured and to the loved ones of the people who lost their lives in the shooting. Just as a kid would do anything not to get in trouble by their mother, so would a criminal who could face life in jail or execution, which is why pleading insanity shouldn’t be up to a criminal, because they would do anything to get out of jail time. The insanity plea, also known as the insanity defense, is a type criminal defense used in order to reduce their liability in court. Barry S. Edwards, a Minnesota criminal defense attorney, asserts...

Words: 1259 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

A Matter over Mind

...and insanity is with a mental illness a person still knows right from wrong while an insane person cannot distinguish between the two. The important second prong of the M’Naghten rule is that the person must know right from wrong. Therefore Clark would have had to know at the time what he was doing was wrong in order to be guilty of intent. (Gibeaut, John Apr2006, Vol. 92) The M’Naghten rule cannot be used for a person who drinks alcohol prior to committing a crime because they know that by drinking in the first place they put others at risk with their actions that follow. It is a lot like premeditation. (Gibeaut, John Apr2006, Vol. 92) Rational and guilty means the person was totally aware that what they were doing was illegal and wrong. Guilty but insane means that the person knew the act was wrong but had no control over their actions because of the mental disorder or disease they have. Not guilty by reason of insanity means that the person had a temporary moment of insanity that they could not control which caused them to do something they would not normally do. (Gibeaut, John Apr2006, Vol. 92) If I were deciding this case I would have to look at the fact that witnesses stated that Clark said he was going to kill a police officer. This means that he premeditated the murder. His claim that he thought the officer was an alien has little merit. I do believe he is insane but after studying law for a year I know that premeditation does not warrant an insanity......

Words: 561 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Insanity Defense

...Insanity Defense Donita Estes, Patrick Fostso, Jennia McCray, Yasmine McGee, Inga Payne CJA/354 October 22, 2012 Samara Belgarde, J.D. Insanity Defense The criminal justice system in America is one of the fair systems in the world where anyone will be innocent until proven of guilt. The whole concept of the court system emphasizes how our laws work regardless where we come from and how we look like or healthy or not anyone is entitles of due process. The idea that our justice and court system are fair to anyone on trial due to an arrest by probable cause and sentencing by a verdict guilty and not guilty of the jury. In the case or State v. Stu Dents, where the defendant was accused of killing his former girlfriend. We are going to elaborate how the charge of insanity can be plead in the defense case and in the other hand give some understanding how this plead play a role in the defendant case during the trial and after the trial in some states and particular California. Does your team feel this defendant is competent to stand trial? Why or why not? We believe that the defendant may not be competent to stand trial, due to the fact that he had has emotionally and mental issues. The defendant has no knowledge of the crime or its consequences, if put on the stand he may revert back to that emotional state of mind and will not be able to give and accurate statement and will not be able to understand charges and sentencing. What is required in your state for an......

Words: 1206 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Insanity Defense Paper

...Insanity Defense Paper Team B CJS/305 June 1, 2015 David Harper Insanity Defense Paper Mr. Stu Dents is charged with the murder of his girlfriend and a legal team has been chosen to represent him. At the time of his arrest, Mr. Dents was witnessed by police yelling such things as “Alien” and “I am God, let me go! I am God!” Now facing not only homicide but several other criminal charges such as burglary, assault on police, and kidnapping, Mr. Dents has made the choice to plead insanity. However, the question remains as to whether or not there is enough for an insanity defense. Should Mr. Dents stand trial? What are the state requirements for an insanity defense? What steps must be taken to prove insanity? Trial Mr. Dents’ defense team needs to decide if he should stand trial or not. Based on his arrest information a reasonable person would believe Mr. Dents to suffer from some sort of mental illness. However, when deciding if a defendant should stand trial or not the decision is not based on their mindset during the crime or the arrest. The decision is based on the mental state of the defendant at the start of trial. According to Criminal Law Today, “a person is competent to stand trial if he or she, at the time of trial, has sufficient present ability to consult with his or her lawyer with a reasonable degree of understanding and a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings” (Schmalleger, Hall, & Dolatowski, 2014). Mr. Dents has already......

Words: 1090 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Analysis of a Rose for Emily

...Emily is a victim of circumstances such as the pressure from the town and the status she had that led her into committing murder. I can relate to Emily in this case where you really love someone such that you contemplate about killing them or finding all possible means to keep them in your life. The future and its outcome at this moment she did not consider except fulfilling the desires of her heart and holding to the person her lover. C. Emily was insane. The insanity defense generally requires that, at the time of the offense, the defendant, as a result of severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate that his actions were wrong. Some classic example of mental illness are mental retardation or post-traumatic stress disorder, or even anti-social personality disorder. The defense requires a showing of severe mental disease or defect. This requirement prevents use of the insanity defense by those who have an immature personality or have displayed a pattern of anti-social behavior. The temporary insanity plea is associated with crimes of passion, but it still is used less than is commonly thought. Evidence 1 “Miss Emily had been a tradition, a duty, and a care; a sort of hereditary obligation upon the town, dating from that day in 1894…” (Faulkner). Throughout the story Emily struggles with the loss of her father. Miss Emily struggled with a loss, her dad died and “She told them that her father was not dead. This behavior shows that she is in denial and she was......

Words: 794 - Pages: 4

Free Essay


...Insanity Defense Before talking about insanity defense, I will define the world insanity first, which is something that people do to protect himself or herself without realizing the gravity or without realizing what he/she does when the action happens. It’s like a senseless action or mistake. Therefore, I did a little research about the “insanity defense”. Beside of my research I found that “the insanity defense in criminal term is where the defendant claims they are not responsible for their actions due to mental health problems”. Do they have to believe what the defendant says about that he/she is or was insane? I say no they have to make a test to show his/her insanity. As I say the law should brings something that show people or to prove the insanity of the defendant. Nonetheless the American law has come out with something that can prove or indentify the insanity of defendant like: M’Naghten Rule, the model penal code etc… In Maryland they uses model penal code to show if the defendant is was insane at the time he did the action. First the all the test of M’Naghten is “a test applied to determine whether a person accused of a crime was sane at the time of its commission and, therefore, criminal responsible for the wrongdoing.” (Queen v. M'Naghten, 8 Eng. Rep. 718 [1843]). The next test is the model penal code is the test that shows people that a defendant is not responsible for his/her act at the time he/she did the murder or something. Beside of my research I......

Words: 460 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Bond Hearings and Plea Entrance Observation

...Bond Hearings and a Plea Entrance; A Day’s Observation in the Circuit Court. Political Science 210 December 2, 2010 Political Science 210 December 2, 2010 Bond Hearings and a Plea Entrance; A Day’s Observation in the Circuit Court. On November 24, 2010, I was given the opportunity to observe a session of the Fairfax County Circuit Court. While observing the session I was able to view five bond hearings and one plea entrance, which allowed for a partial understanding of the typical daily court docket. Because many cases are settled outside of court, the daily proceedings within the courtroom are often shorter and without much argument. Fairfax County Virginia is located in the northeastern portion of Virginia nearby the District of Columbia. The county is the largest by population in the state, and also the densest county at 1,037,605 people within the county’s 407 square miles. Home to several intelligence agencies, and half of the metropolitan area’s Fortune 500 companies, Fairfax county has one of the highest median incomes in the country for a county of its size, second only to neighboring Loudoun County. The county was the first in the nation to reach a six figure median income and is known as one of the most populous areas in the Greater Washington Metropolitan Areas. The Fairfax County Circuit court, located in Fairfax City, is used to serve the residents of both the county and the city itself. The court is in the 19th......

Words: 4050 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Keyboard skip jail time but he will still be required to report to a probationary officer on a regular basis. Giner's lawyer Rodolfo Viajar, Jr. agreed with the court's ruling, according to the copy shown to Giner's arraignment started at 8:30 am Wednesday at branch 14 of the Metropolitan Trial Court in Manila. The conviction of Giner is now considered a landmark case, as he is the first local hacker to be convicted under section 33a of the E-Commerce Law or Republic Act 8792, according to DoJ Secretary Raul Gonzalez and Chief State Prosecutor Jovencito Zuño who have provided support to the prosecution of the case. In a separate interview, Geronimo Sy, the state prosecutor handling the case, revealed that Giner's lawyer had agreed to a plea bargain before Wednesday's arraignment, wherein the local hacker was advised to...

Words: 797 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Courtroom Participants’ Professional Standards

...Courtroom Participants’ Professional Standards Name CJA 224 Date Professor When entering a courtroom the main common goal is to have a guilty or not guilty verdict. While being in the courtroom you can come across some participant that are in misconduct, which can have a serious consequence. Courtroom misconduct can go any where from making improper remarks or improperly introducing evidence designed to prejudice the jury. Prosecutorial misconduct violates court rules or ethical standards of law practice. Hiding, destroying or tampering with evidence, can also have serious consequence, which is taken very seriously in the courtrooms. If the prosecutorial fails to disclose evidence that might tend to exonerate the defendant, threatening, badgering or tampering with witness can also, lead to jail time. Acting in these action can lead to them being disbarred and fined. The due process control model and the crime control model in evaluating the judicial process. Prosecutors have a big responsibility within the criminal justice system. They act as the legal representatives of the government when cases are filed against people who violated the law. It is essential for prosecutors to ensure that the evidence is sufficient before they bring the case to the court. The standards set by Strickland v. Washington will also be clarified by describing it and its effect on courtroom cases. These guidelines and procedures cover rules in handling evidence, code of ethics...

Words: 1054 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Plea Bargaining

...Plea Bargaining Paper Daniel Herrera CJA/224 Introduction to Criminal Courts Dr. Beverly Spencer 9/1/2014 Plea Bargaining Paper Plea bargaining is one of the most important pieces of criminal court proceedings that can occur. Plea bargaining is that chance in which a defendant can choose to not be punished or charged as harshly as they should be. Plea bargaining is a very common thing used within the courthouse and even though it can be good for an individual it can also be bad if not completely understood. The thing with a plea bargain is that at any time a judge can overthrow a bargain and still send the case through strenuous court hours. Plea bargaining is however very important because over ninety percent of all criminal cases are built and completed due to plea bargaining. Plea bargaining can be defined as an agreement between a prosecutor and a defendant whereby the defendant is allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge rather than risk conviction for a graver crime in order to avoid a protracted trial or to win the defendant’s cooperation as a witness (“Plea Bargaining”, 2014). Now a plea bargain can mean everything to nothing towards a case. The prosecution would use these types of bargains for leverage against the defendant. What is meant by this is that the defendant can be offered to give a testimony of the events which can eventually lead into a charge and conviction into a higher profiled case. This is the case most of the time; usually the......

Words: 1148 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...font, use bold type, or some other means for setting your responses apart (but please do NOT change the color of the typeface). 6. When you have completed entering your responses, print out your final copy and sign the last page. Also, be sure to attach any necessary documents before you submit the final copy. DO NOT INCLUDE THIS SHEET WHEN SUBMITTING STAGE TWO FOR GRADING! KANE COUNTY ADULT COURT SERVICES PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT Please type all responses Defendant’s Name: Edward Ignatious Case #: 16 CF 0071 Investigator’s Name: Rodrick Parker Date of Report: 3/15/16 Charge(s) Plead: Unlawful Use of Weapon (720 ILCS 5/24-1(a)(8)) & Aggravated Assault (720 ILCS 5/12-2(c)(1)) Date of Guilty Plea: 3/2/16 Sentencing Date: 3/28/16 Part I: Case Information and Summary Please provide a narrative that...

Words: 2805 - Pages: 12

Free Essay


...PSYCHOLOGY (Principles that Defines Insanity) Michael Colton (University) Introduction The etymology of the word “insane” came from the mid-16th century Latin word “insanus” which literally means “not healthy” and is commonly defined as “a state of mind that prevents normal perception, behavior, or social interaction; seriously mentally ill.” (Oxford Dictionary) Insane can also be used as an adjective that pertains to something highly unique, passionate or extreme. Three Principles that Defines Insanity Insanity is a legal term that speaks of “a defendant's ability to determine right from wrong when a crime is committed” or “mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior” (Howes, 2009). In the legal realm, insanity does not have a medical meaning; only a legal meaning. The legal meanings of insanity have very slight thing to do with the psychological or psychiatric characteristics of mental illness. Legal insanity is a perception that was established in handing over guilt or innocence to specific defendants, and is not meant to recognize the roots of mental pathology or its actions. Insanity defense is exercised as a type of defense asserted by an accused in a criminal prosecution in order to avoid any liability for commission of a crime. The......

Words: 854 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Criminal Trial

...The criminal trial process begins with the arresting of the individual or the filing for an arrest warrant. An arraignment usually occurs within 48 hours after an arrest. At this time if the defendant has not been mirandized, they will advise them of their rights and of the charges against one. Bail will be set as long as the charge is not murder (2011). A judge can determine if he wants to impose bail for someone charged with murder. They will be given a date for their next court appearance and will be able to post bail and leave or if bail is denied will be remanded into custody (2011). In a state case the preliminary hearing is the next step. Within 7 to 10 days of the initial arraignment the preliminary hearing will take place. During this hearing a district judge will decide if the charges should be upheld. The prosecutions job is to prove that the charges are valid via a prima facie case. Witnesses and evidence will be provided by the prosecutor. The defense attorney does not provide any at this point. If the charges are federal charges an individual goes before a grand jury instead of a preliminary hearing. Grand jury trials are private hearings comprised of 23 citizens. The only one allowed to present in this hearing is the jury, prosecutor, and any witnesses the prosecutors deems necessary. The witnesses can only enter one at a time and have to leave immediately after giving there testimony. A formal arraignment takes place within 30 days from......

Words: 1026 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Koss Company

...maximum penalty of 120 years in jail, but 15 to 20 years is appropriate under federal sentencing guidelines. Because she cooperated with authorities from the very beginning of their investigation, the judge limited her sentence on November 17, 2010, to 11 years in federal prison, plus restitution to Koss of $34 million. Her physician husband filed for divorce after the sentencing hearing. Federal officials have seized most of her assets, including a 2007 Mercedes-Benz, timeshares, jewelry, shoes, furs, and other luxury items – some that were never worn because they were put into storage for lack of space. Sachdeva’s attorney claims she has a bipolar disease of compulsive shopping disorder and is an alcoholic. Countering the defendant’s plea for a lenient sentence because of mental illness, Koss CEO Michael Koss asked the judge to sentence Sachdeva to the maximum 15 to 20 years, writing that she “stole from the hardworking employees of the company and their families, and ultimately the stockholders of the...

Words: 351 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...Waterloo, Iowa. They were bound by handcuffs at the wrists and chained from the upper torso to their ankles in groups of ten. Hearings were being put on as fast as possible, sentencing five at a time over the course of the three days following the raid. Few workers were allowed to talk to attorneys before being presented before the judge. These immigrant workers were arrested for having false identity paper and were charged with identity theft, document fraud, use of stolen social security numbers and other offenses. Most were convicted within four days of the arrest and sentenced to serve a five month prison sentence before being deported. Many of the immigrant workers had no prior criminal record so they were offered a plea agreement in exchange for a guilty plea to lesser charges than the mandatory two year sentence. About 297 workers accepted the agreement and pleaded guilty to document fraud. They pleaded guilty mostly because they did not understand what the judge was saying, or they knew there was no way out of going to prison so they wanted the fastest and least amount of time. They needed a short...

Words: 978 - Pages: 4