Free Essay

Pm and Cabinet

In: Other Topics

Submitted By swilly29
Words 3396
Pages 14
08
Fall
How governments are formed

There are no codified rules in the UK to state how government is formed, in theory it is in the hands of the monarch – up until the 19thCentury this was largely a reality. However the monarch no longer plays any active role in this process. The party that wins a majority of seats in the House of Commons after a general election, its leader will be invited by the monarch to form a government.

2010 Coalition

* Conservatives were longest party in HoC but failed to win overall majority * Labour negotiated a coalition with LibDems and later the LibDems negotiated with both main parties for a coalition * Labour and LibDem did not make an overall majority * Gordon Brown later resigned and advised the Queen to ask Cameron to form a government either as a minority or in coalition with LibDems. * Cameron accepted and formed coalition with LibDem

‘The Government’

25 members are members of the HoL and 90 are MPs. MPs that are from the party that is in government ate not members of government! They are known as backbenchers and the members of government are known as frontbenchers. All members of government are appointed by the PM. The cabinet (22-23 members) meet regularly.

Ministerial selection

The PM must weigh up the qualities of individuals against the political consequences of appointing them.

Qualities that ideal ministers should possess: * Must be politically reliable * Must have potential * Should share their views * Managerial skills needed
Under coalition * How many cabinet posts do they have each? * Must discuss whom to elect together

Other forms of government

* Minority government – party forms a government without a parliamentary majority. Can never rely on getting legislation/financial budgets passed. It must therefore try to build a coalition of support from other parties. Therefore minority governments cannot attempt to do anything radical. * Coalition government – where two or more parties take part. There are two conditions that must be me: 1. Ministerial posts are shared between the coalition parties 2. There needs to be an agreement by all the coalition parties as to which policies can be accepted
There had been no coalition government in the UK from 1945 until 2010 – considered to be unnatural.

Different types of coalition: * Majority coalition – formed by 2 parties simply to create parliamentary majority. * Grand coalition – between 2 major parties – formed to create an overwhelming majority. * Rainbow coalition – between a larger number of parties, often of great varying philosophies. Normally one large party and several smaller ones. * National coalition – where all parties/selection of parties are invited to participate. Occur at times of national crisis and are designed to create unity.

Cabinet government in the past

Since the 1960s cabinet government has been gradually eroded and replaced by the notion of ‘prime ministerial government’

Cabinet realities that were taken for granted: * Represented the collective identity of government * Domestic and foreign policies made within cabinet * In order for a policy to be official it would need full cabinet approval * Disputes within government would have been resolved in cabinet * PM had a higher status than his/her colleagues but was often out voted within the cabinet

Cabinet government – A system of government where the cabinet is the central policy-making body.

Prime Ministerial domination

* 1960s PM became increasingly dominant within government, in the same period the role of media was becoming increasingly important. The media were choosing to centre on the PM alone as the spokesperson for the whole government. This caused the PM to be the presenter and the maker of government policy. * Thatcher took prime ministerial domination to a new level; after the election following the Falklands War (1982) Thatcher appeared to dominate the whole government machinery. She became to be either feared or respected by her colleagues. She was respected abroad almost as Churchill had been, and the media concentrated all their attention on her. Ultimately her own cabinet removed her in 1990 after her support for the highly unpopular poll tax. * She was replaced by John Major who brought back cabinet and collective decision-making. However the cabinet proved to be an obstacle in the way of Major’s attempts to improve our democracy. * Tony Blair 1997-2007 set about restoring personal control. He took prime-ministerial control to new heights. His style of leadership was often described as ‘sofa politics’; a form of practice of settling issues with individual ministers privately and informally. Blair’s style was also described as presidential; he often spoke on behalf of the nation rather than the head of government. His total domination of foreign affairs marked Tony Blair as one of the most dominant PMs. * Gordon Brown 2007-2010 could never dominate as Blair had done; he had a lack of media and public support and a gap in his legitimacy since he had never faced the electorate in the general election as a party leader. Commonly described as an ‘unelected PM’ * David Cameron 2010- faces domination within a coalition, where he must share power within 2 parties.

Prime Minister

Generally over the years the Monarch’s role has slowly decreased as more jobs have been put on the PM’s.

Sir Robert Walpole was the first ever prime minister (1720), he became PM because the king decided to appoint someone under the unofficial title of ‘prime minister’. Prime (number one) minister (helper). Until the 19th century the king chose who should be appointed and were all from the House of Lords. However all the government really did up until the 20th century was have control over money and who defends our country etc as the majority of tasks that are in government now weren’t invented back then.

Late 1800’s PM’s started to be chosen from the House of Commons and in 1860’s today’s method of election for the PM came into place, decreasing the role of the Monarch yet again.

The role of prime minister

The prime minister is the head of the UK government. One of the prime minister’s main jobs is to appoint ministers to run the governments departments. Today the prime minister’s authority comes from being the leader of the political party with the MP’s elected to the House of Commons.

Functions

1. Chief policy maker – although this role is clearly shared with other ministers, cabinet and with his party, there is no doubt that the PM is completely pre-eminent in making the governments policy. – Different in a coalition. 2. Head of government – this is a function that covers a number of roles. The PM is in charge of the machinery of government; he can create new posts and new departments as well as abolish them, establish committees and policy units and combine existing ones. This also means he is head of the civil service and can seek advice from its vast machinery. He also chairs cabinet meetings, determining their agenda and controlling the system of cabinet committees that underpins it. But above all, he determines which individuals should hold posts as ministers, senior judges and senior bishops and archbishops of the Church of England. 3. Chief government spokesperson – the PM must be the ultimate source of the official version of government policy to the media. The definitive expression of policy must come from the PM (no matter what party). This can however create an illusion that the PM creates all policy; this is wrong however it does mean that the PM can place his or her own interpretation on all policy. 4. Commander-in-chief of the armed forces – this role is exercised on behalf of the monarch who is no longer permitted to become involved with suck matters except purely on a ceremonial level. It is the PM’s decision and his decision alone whether to commit British troops into battle or not. He may of course seek advice but he has the final say. Examples of this include: * Margaret Thatcher ordered a military task force to the Falkland Islands in 1982 to drive out the Argentine invaders. * David Cameron ordered the Royal Air Force to enforce a ‘no-fly zone’ over Libya during the armed uprising there in 2011. This was later extended to missions to destroy the regime’s ability to carry out operations against the rebels and civilian populations. * We can also add the list of tasks and responsibilities of maintaining national security (controlling terrorism and emergency powers in emergency times such as a war) 5. Chief foreign-policy maker (international statesman) – this is a policy carried out for the monarch. Can mean anything from negotiating with foreign powers, to negotiating and signing treaties, to chairing international meetings. Tony Blair in particular concentrated on this role. The prime minister today must also conduct British relations with the EU. 6. Parliamentary leader – It is the role of the PM to lead his party in parliament. He must decide who shall be minister, but he is also in overall control of the government’s strategy within both houses.

Collective Cabinet Responsibility – all decisions are collectively supported by all members of the government in public for example; Claire Short and Jack Straw resigned from cabinet because they could no follow the principle of ‘collective responsibility’ when Tony Blair wanted to go to war in Iraq (2003)

Prime ministerial government – Prime Minister is at the centre of all policy making
Cabinet government – Cabinet collectively makes the decisions/policies

Sources of PM power and authority * The ruling party – power in parliament and country (members). PM has elective authority. When there is no overall majority, PMs authority comes from the largest party – e.g. Cameron in coalition and agreement with Nick Clegg * Royal Prerogative – Monarch retains power to carry out functions as head of state (theory+law) e.g. commands armed forces. Also appoints and dismisses ministers, decides general election date etc. However today these powers are delegated to PM. * Popular mandate – Party leader has become a significant factor in voting choices. Popular mandate causes stronger authority for PM. * Parliament – PM is a parliamentary leader. Has parliamentary authority with the support of the Hoc.

The PMs own personal qualities also effect the authority and power he/she holds; e.g. Margaret Thatcher

PMs ‘formal’ powers (enjoyable by all PMs) * Appointment and dismissal of ministers * Granting peerages and other honors * Head of civil service * Appointing senior judges and bishops * Commanding armed forces * Head of foreign relations * Maintaining national security * Chairing cabinet meetings

‘Informal’ powers vary according to circumstances * Making government policy * Parliamentary leadership * Controlling cabinet * National leadership

Limitations on PM power * Size of parliamentary majority – if it is low PM can never rely on parliamentary approval. Cameron enjoys a comfortable over other parties thanks to the coalition * Unity of the ruling party – If the PM can maintain a united leadership group then he/she can achieve much more than one who is constantly forced to maintain a cohesion * Public and media profile – when a good profile from the media is lost, the PM becomes a liability. Therefore the ruling party will be unwilling to accept their leadership * Enjoy confidence of cabinet and parliament – this is the ultimate limitation; if cabinet overrules PM there is nothing he/she can do. Policies of PM are meaningless until he/she secures parliamentary approval. Under coalition this becomes problematic * PMs may be hindered by own party opposition – PMs must always be careful not to lose the confidence of their own party (Margaret Thatcher) * Coalition problems – PM no longer in total control over policy. Cannot rely so much on parliamentary majority.

How PM loses power

Previously PMs have lost power by resigning for personal reasons or removed by the electorate

Prime ministerial vs. Presidential p61-266

President is head of state; prime minister is not (Queen). Prime minister does not have Presidents powers!! Just style is developing more like a president.

Ways in which we are more presidential now:

* Media image, very concerned of the media * Use of personal advisors * Effectively the PM is more like a president not legally! * Growth in the importance of foreign military affairs * Spatial leadership – PM’s believe to be ‘separate’ from the rest of the government (above gov)

Ways in which we are prime-ministerial now:

* Office of PM is flexible – what the holder wishes to make of it * Been a change of style rather than substance. Still subject to the constraints that have previously existed. * When PM try to stretch office powers to far, the constraints become increasingly strong * PM has no right to presidential status * David Cameron has been unable to dominate domestic politics

The PM IS now effectively a president | The PM is NOT effectively a president | PM perform most of the functions of a head of state | Has been no permanent change. | PMs now have extensive sources of advice of their own. 10 Downing Street increasingly resembles the inner circle in the presidential White House | In substance the role of the PM has not changed | Media tend to concentrate on PM as personal spokesman for the government | There are important forces that will rein in PM power. | Foreign and military affairs have become more important. The PM dominates these | PM is not actually head of state | Importance of spatial leadership in UK increasingly looks like a presidential style of leadership | |

Growth of 10 Downing Street - Foley

Was originally known as the cabinet office and did not directly involve themselves with policy until 1960s. Has since shifted from serving the government as a whole to mainly serving just the PM. It has also been far more concerned with development of policy. Effectively the PM has several hundred advisors who work for him.

Spatial leadership – PM separates themselves from its other members and so are able to act independently, but also to remain part of t he government itself. Thatcher and Reagan even criticised their own government.

President Blair – Tony Blair brought presidential ‘style’ to new heights. He dominated political agenda, but his preference was in foreign and international affairs. He appeared more comfortable in these roles, was more popular and gained serious respect abroad. However the British resented his presidential style, thus respect abroad was lost by lack of trust at home. The political opposition to him and his government was weak and so it can be said that Blair dominated not through his own efforts but through the failings of others.

President Cameron

Not as dominate as Blair: * Does not secure parliamentary majority * Not as ideologically united * More consensual politician than Blair * Constrained by the need to reduce government debt – unable to complete major reforms

Ministers and Departments

Examples * Treasury * Foreign Office * Department of Justice * Department for women and equality

Each department has two heads (minister + civil servant).
Minister = secretary of state and Civil Servant = permanent secretary.
Minister is normally a cabinet minister with junior ministers below him/her, normally known as ministers of state who do not sit in the cabinet. Private political advisors assist these ministers they help give political advise, etc. All secretaries and ministers of state are appointed by the PM, political advisors are appointed by the ministers themselves.

Ministers | Civil Servants | Appointed for political reasons | Appointed because they have specialist/administrative skills (politically neutral) | Temporary – appointed until PM says so | Permanent – expected to stay | Expected to hold political views and may have their own political agenda | Must have no political agenda, whatever their private views might be | Are politically committed to one party | May only suggest alternatives in a neutral way | Expected to make political decisions | Identify possible outcomes in a neutral way | Have to use judgments about the outcomes of decisions | Cannot be held publicly accountable for what they do | Have a high public profile | Will remain in position even if there is a change of government | Are publicly accountable for the performance of their department | | Will lose office if their party loses power | | TASKS | Set the political agenda | Gather info for policy making | Determine priorities for action | Provide alternative courses for action | Decide between political alternatives | Advise on consequences of decisions | Obtain cabinet and prime-ministerial approval for policies | Draft legislation | Steer proposals through parliament | Provide briefings for other ministers | Be accountable to parliament for policies and their implementation | Advise on implementation methods | Account to parliament for the general performance of their department | Organise implementation of policy | | Draft answers to parliamentary questions |

Open government

Refers to a policy of attempting to allow more access by the media and public to decision-making processes in government.
The freedom of information act 2005 has caused an opening up in the process of government, but progress has remained limited.
The requirement for civil servants to be neutral and anonymous has caused a lot of secrecy in government. So the concept of open government remains more of an aspiration than a reality.

Cabinet committees

A cabinet committee is a small group of cabinet ministers who meet and discuss a specific area of government policy, however most important decisions need wider approval. Some committees are permanent e.g. economic matters and some are temporary e.g. Olympic games. Larger areas of policy making also require specialised sub-committees. Examples of committees are: home affairs, foreign affairs and public expenditure. Over the years committees have effectively taken over the work of the full cabinet. The cabinet in full session does not have the time or information to be able to deal with most matters. The growth in the importance of committees has had an increasing effect on prime-ministerial control as the PM controls the creation of the committees. It is much easier for a PM to control a small group of ministers than the whole cabinet.

Cabinet today 1. When a dispute between ministers cannot be resolved, the matter may be brought to the full cabinet 2. There may also be circumstances where the PM decides that an issue should be resolved by a full cabinet session 3. In times of national emergency it is often seen as desirable that the whole cabinet should back government policies 4. It has become increasingly important for government to present a united front to the media and parliament and to ensure that policy is seen in the most favorable light possible 5. Just as parliament must legitimise all proposed legislation, so too must cabinet legitimise policy proposals and key decisions.

Cabinet under coalition government

Similarities | Differences | Remains dominated by PM | ‘Agreements to differ’ between coalition partners | Meetings are secret | LibDem leaders are to be appointed to cabinet/moved within cabinet | The collective identity of the government | Rules of collective responsibility are now weaker | All members are expected to defend publicly all cabinet decisions | There is a greater risk of conflict so the PM has to take more account of differing opinions |
Cabinet formation – single party

1. Will he chose a ‘balanced’ cabinet, containing all shades of political opinion or will he chose a team that is ideologically united? 2. Which individuals/who should fill the 22 posts that are available in modern cabinet?

What a PM would take into consideration when choosing individuals:

* Political allies from the past * Individual who can represent an important section * Great ability and widely respected? * Great potential and successful? * Old personal friends * Popular figures within public and media? * Political identity of the new government * Extremely able people – ‘will do a good job?’

Cabinet formation – coalition

1. PM must consult with coalition partner 2. Balance of party membership mirrors party strengths in HoC 3. PM must give a prominent role to the leader of the coalition partner

Individual ministerial responsibility

The convention that a minister should resign if their department makes a serious political/personal error. In practice, this usually means that a minister is responsible to parliament and must face questioning and criticism.

* PM must be prepared to face criticism from parliament * Resignations on the grounds of errors/excessive parliamentary criticism have been absent – ministers are much more likely to hang on to their jobs, even in the teeth of criticism * Parliament itself does not have the power to remove an individual minister from office – only the PM can * PM hardly takes responsibility anymore

2011 – immigration scandal – Theresa May blamed
1997 – Michael Cameron refused to resign
2002 – Steven Buyers did resign

Collective responsibility

In the UK all members of the government must collectively support all cabinet decisions, at least in public. It also implies that the whole government stands or falls, as one, on the decisions made by the cabinet.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

What Are the Main Sources of Prime Ministerial Power - Exemplar

...is debate to the extent of he or she’s power; the PM draws power from a number of sources. The extent to which these powers are harnessed and used is dependent upon a number of factor, but in reality the PM can gather an incredible amount of power from the traditions, conventions and laws which regulate the post of Prime Minister. The post is seen as providing “National Leadership” and is therefore the pre-eminent position in UK politics. The Prime Minister is first and foremost an MP. This affords them legitimate power to act as they see fit on behalf of the electorate. Moreover, they have also been democratically elected within their own party, therefore they have a mandate to rule. The principle job and source of power for the PM is to set up a government. Ratified by the Queen this gives the PM the power of patronage. They can hire and fire; this gives them control and power over the careers of party members and peers. As a result party member and ministers want to impress the PM and often agree with his or her policies. Much of the PM’s power comes from being able to “hire and fire”. Although this does come with constraints; firing members of the cabinet can cause tensions within the party. However, substantial reshuffles have secures a PM’s power such as Blair’s. In addition during a coalition government management of the cabinet is more complex and less likely to strengthen the power of the PM. Not only does the PM control who sits as part of the the executive ......

Words: 706 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

How Poweful Is the Pm?

...The PM is the most powerful person within the British political system, so believe he is now more powerful than ever due to his increased use of royal prerogative powers. The PM is powerful because he is head of the cabinet, including individual ministers and departments. But as important The PM is powerful in the sense that he was the ability to appoint cabinet ministers, dismiss them, promote and demote all ministers in government. He can select around 100 politicians from Commons and the Lords but can demote ministers in government such as Secretaries of States. The PM elects ministers who strongly support his ideologies or support his policies are appointed to respectable positions, whilst inner party opposition peers are selected to junior ministerial roles. These ‘opposition peers’ are often members of factions, in the Conservatives case that could be the “1922 Committee”. The PM can therefore influence their political careers and if careless actions occur this can lead to the end of that career. In October 2013, David Cameron had a cabinet reshuffle and of junior ministerial roles. For example, Baroness Warsi left the role as Tory Party co-chairman and was replaced by Grant Shapps. Andrew Langsley, a well-known MP who was part of the expenses scandal moved to lower profile roles. This would have been done in order to protect the reputation of him, as he wouldn’t want the electorate to think that troublesome/careless ministers still had a large influence in cabinet.......

Words: 1448 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Politics

...Government & Politics Unit 2 * Constitution * Codified Constitution ✓ * Advantages & Disadvantages * Features * Uncodified Constitution ✓ * Advantages & Disadvantages * Features * Is Parliament Sovereign? ✓ * Arguments For and Against * Strengths and Weaknesses of the UK’s constitution ✓ * Constitutional Reforms – Coalition and 1997-2010 ✓ * What are they? * Are they effective? * PM & Cabinet * Features & Functions of the PM ✓ * What must a politician be to becoming PM * What can a PM do? * Functions of Cabinet ✓ * Factors that affect promotion and resignation of a minister ✓ * Powers and Constraints of PM ✓ * Theories of Executive Power ✓ * PM V Cabinet ✓ * Parliament * Functions of Parliament ✓ * What are they? * How effective are they? * Powers of Parliament ✓ * What are they? * How effective are they? * Parliamentary Reform ✓ * What are they? * How effective are they? * Relationship between Parliament and Government ✓ * Factors that affect it * How the coalition affects it Constitution: 2 Types of Constitution * Codified & Uncodified Codified Constitution * Constitution where the rules are written down in a single document. Example could be the USA...

Words: 4289 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

To What Extent Is the Uk’s Government Becoming More Presidential? Discuss

...three branches of government are fused together and the monarchy is head of state. The Uk, for instance has a prime ministerial government, where Queen Elizabeth is head of state and David Cameron is the Executive. One could argue that the Uk’s government has become marginally presidential, as the need for a cabinet has become less over time. However, the UK are still a fused government in which powers are shared within parliament, unlike a presidential system. The tendency of Prime Ministers to distance themselves from their party and government has increased, developing a personal ideological stance. Prime Ministers such as Blair and Thatcher are key examples. Both Prime Ministers have developed their own stances: “Blairism” and “Thatcherism’. Blair, for example, had really bad attendance at Parliament and his Cabinet Ministers have been quoted as saying that: “Cabinet meeting sometimes lasted only fifteen minutes.” also, Blair decided a lot of his policies within the Pm’s office, rather than discussing it with his cabinet. For example, the decision to go to war with Iraq was seen as sofa politics and a singular decision rather than a plural decision with the cabinet. This shows that Blair had a tendency to act like a president. Tony Blair was also actively trying to be a leader in world affairs, like going abroad and making key decisions about other countries like Iraq. Thus, showing that he was increasingly becoming like an american president and trying to move the UK......

Words: 1122 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Coalition Government

...coalition partners agreed that they will hold a referendum. 2) One problem that might arise if the cabinet contained both Conservatives and Lib.Dems is that the government is not stable. It is very possible that the two partners may disagree on their policies and proposals. For example the Liberals opposed the further use of nuclear energy, but it was agreed between the leaderships of the two coalition partners that more nuclear power plants can be build. This can build conflicts between the two parties and result in government failure. Furthermore in the UK coalitions are formed in a time of crisis and the country may be seen by other international countries as weak and this can damage their international competitiveness and foreign investment, which are very important in order to keep the economy running. Furthermore coalition government is actually less democratic as the balance of power is inevitably held by the small parties who can barter their support for concessions from the main groups within the coalition.One possible example is the demand of constitutional reforms by the Liberal Democrats in the UK as their price of coalition support in a future hung parliament. 3) In the essay I shall discus for what reason and to what extent has the cabinet government declined in the UK. A cabinet government is a government in which the real executive power rests with a cabinet of ministers who are...

Words: 850 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Presidentialism

...such as the efficiency of each system in implementing government policies needs to be considered. Furthermore, factors such as political stability and order needs to be considered in suggesting a better form of government. Political stability refers to the frequency at which the government changes, where as political order refers to level of civil obedience every time there is a change to the political system. Parliamentary system In a political system run by a parliamentary system, the executive power of the government resides with the Prime Minster and her/her cabinet, which is voted by a democratically voted legislature. The party which holds the majority of the support, is said to have the 'confidence' of the cabinet. In the case where there is no majority party in the cabinet, decisions and actions of the government are decided through a series of bargains and debates between the different parties in the cabinet (British parliament backs hybrid embryos, 2008). There isn't a fixed term for a party to be in charge of a parliament; the prime minister and his political party hold office as long as they command the majority of the confidence in the legislature. As soon as the Parliament loses confidence in the legislature, there is an immediate dissolution of the legislature and the head of...

Words: 1988 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Are British Prime Ministers as Powerful as Is Sometimes Claimed, [40]

...Are British Prime ministers as powerful as is sometimes claimed? [40] It is often argued that in this day and age, Prime ministers are almost untouchable within the British political system, due to the shear number of powers that the Prime minister holds, and the prerogatives that he utilises. However, due to a handful of checks and balances on the government, and the Prime minister not being separated from the political system, which means he or she is liable to these checks and limitations, the Prime minister may therefore not be perceived as all that powerful. As previously mentioned, the Prime minister enjoys a collection of powers within the UK political system. Firstly, the prime minister has this huge amount of power due to the fact that they are both part of the executive branch of government and the legislature, due to the fusion of powers within the British political system. This means that they are able to create law and then use their representation in the legislature to force through this law. For example, when Tony Blair won a landslide victory in 1997, winning 179 seats. As a result of this, he was not beaten in the commons until 2005, when they rejected his proposition on terror laws. Tony Blair can also be used as another example of how Prime ministers are as powerful as is sometimes claimed. Prime ministers have many prerogative powers that are granted to them by the Queen as head of state. For example, in 2003, when Tony Blair utilised these......

Words: 1212 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Has the Power of the Uk Prime Minister Increased?

...sources of authority and his dominance over the cabinet government. However due to the coalition formed in the 2010 general election the argument that the Prime Ministers power has not increased takes precedent because power has to be shared and they can still be removed from office by their party or parliament. The UK government is becoming more closely comparable to the American presidential system, as the Prime Minister holds more power, mainly due to his dominance over the cabinet. The party leader has the ability to choose who is appointed what position within the cabinet; David Cameron announced he would ‘re-shuffle’ the make-up of the cabinet after being elected in 2010. Thus allowing him to choose individuals to undertake certain roles which he can manipulate to his advantage. The Prime Minister can also dominate the decisions which should be made by the cabinet. For example Margaret Thatcher’s decision to ban trade unions at GCHQ in Cheltenham in 1984, was the result of a meeting between a small group which defied the convention of Cabinet collective decision making. Demonstrating how the power of the Prime Minister has increased as the cabinet government has adopted a more passive role. Similarly to their dominance of the cabinet, another valid reason in favour of the Prime Minister having increased powers is that they have multiple sources of authority. For example the weakened role of the cabinet has enabled the PM to pass policy in Downing Street through the......

Words: 391 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Vietnam Notes

...parliament ie drawing up speeches legislation responces to questions which is ultimatly very sensitive work relating directly to the posistion of the minister so they will be cautious in what the say and write. the posistion of prime minister firstly has no constitutionally enshriened role and therefore there is no guidebook or set of rules on how he or she is to operate there government so therefore the posistion of the prime minster or the pm is largely relient on what the holder chooses it to be and what they make of it. There are usally two main types of prime minister the presidental model and the prime minsterial model. Firstly the prime ministerial model is more cabinet focused this is usally beacause the pm has a small majority so it is neccesary for him to constsntly consult the cabinet on almost all issues and have a strong party consensus on the direction of government. A example of this kind of government was john majors early 90s government major only had a small majority of 18 so had to constantly consult his cabinet about...

Words: 567 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Politics Exam Edinbrugh

...Northern Consortium United Kingdom – Politics Past paper questions for June exam < Module 1 > Section A 1a What are the differences between Public Bills Committees and Select Committees? [5] Public Bills Committee is part of legislative process, whereas Select Committee is part of scrutiny process. In the former committee, the bill is examined by line by line to ensure that its wording and language is clear to allow any amendments on the bill. In the latter committee, there are two departments – governmental and non-governmental. They examine government departments’ expeditures , policies and policies. There are between 16 to 50 members in the PBC who are selected by Committee of Selection whose 7 out 9 members are ships. On the other hand, there are 11 members in the SCs and to eliminate “the conflict of interest, all the members are backbench members who are elected using the Alternative vote system. 2a What are the main functions of Parliament and how well does it perform them? [5] < This question is a 20-mark question > 3a What are the differences between direct and representative democracy? [5] In direct democracy, people are directly involved in decision-making processes, whereas in representative democracy, people elect MPs who will represent and form a government in Parliament. For instance, some qualified members of Athenian society were involved in decision-making and a referendum is a limited form of direct democracy. Also general......

Words: 18470 - Pages: 74

Free Essay

Politics

...what extent does the prime minister control the cabinet? Prime ministers have a lot that they can manage and control the cabinet and the system surrounding it. So power can vary but the Prime Minister definitely has a more power that say backbencher, ministers and your average MPs The main reasons for the control the Prime Minister has over Cabinet are due to the powers they have over the Cabinet itself. The Prime Minister chairs cabinet meetings, and manages the agendas, as well as making the decisions at the end. This means that the Prime Minister has a lot of control over the meetings, and can direct choose which way the meetings lead to suite what he wants to cover and get support for.The fact that the Prime Minister says when the cabinet meeting are and decides when they are called and sets their length then it means that the PM determines the role and significance of the entire cabinet. Cabinet meetings have declined because the number of meetings changed from 100 a year to only 40. When former Prime Minister and Labour politician Tony Blair had meetings they never really lasted more than an hour. If you look at the size of the Cabinet and the extent of the amount of issues that are discussed shows that Blair did not take the meetings as important. But the man who succeeded Blair was Gordon Brown who made them last longer, but not a lot. The Prime minister in the past has been know to manipulate the Cabinet to get support for their cause. An......

Words: 816 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Pols

...COMPARATIVE FOREING GOVERNMENT The US Political system- principles, institutions, rules and performance * A Democratic Republic * Political power, authority and legitimacy resides in the ¨we the people¨ * Officeholders serve specified terms and face regularly schedule elections * Political office cannot be inherited or conferred (no monarch, no nobility) * A constitutional system * A single document defining government powers, institutions and their functions, electoral procedures * Short and difficult to amend * Flexible and adaptable to changing circumstances (¨living document¨) * Widely perceived as legitimate by ¨we the people¨ * A representative democracy * Elected representatives –not ¨we the people¨-- make national law and policy (no referenda, recall, or ballot initiative) * The rule of law * Power of government over citizens explicitly limited (bill of rights) * The judiciary (federal courts) is on independent brunch of government whose members are protected by interference * All the elected are subjected to the law * Appointed officials are accountable to elected officials and to the courts * Institutional characteristics * /Separation of power/ divides political power and governmental authority among three branches having distinctive powers * Checks and balances allows each branch to offset the powers of the others * A powerful bicameral legislature with a meaningful upper house ......

Words: 1961 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Pm592

...Executive Summary Brown Equity Group franchises multi-unit real estate developments. Our service will be to develop Chicago Place, a 200 unit residential dwelling with the goal to extend long term leases, expand rent growth and maximize cap rate compression over a 5 year plan. Chicago Place is expected costs are $1,517,290.00, over a 18 month duration that could possible gross $1,122,240.00 of potential revenue   Project Description This proposal covers the development of one new, large multi-unit property that will bring potential opportunities to buy high quality real estate from distressed sellers at a discount to replacement cost with meaningful upside potential from lease-up, rent growth and maximize cap rate compression. In this plan, the strategy of Chicago Place will be to purchase, construct, maximize rents in each unit thus increasing.   WBS 1 Acquisition & Planning 1.1 Grounds 1.1.1 Franchise Fee 1.1.2 Purchase Land 1.1.3 Hire Architect 1.1.4 Review & Approve Blue Prints 1.1.5 General Contractor Solicitation 1.1.6 Hire General Contractor 1.1.7 Submit Blue Prints to City 1.1.8 Purchase Permits 1.1.9 Order Utilities 2 Construct Building 2.1 General Contractor 2.1.1 Land 2.1.1.1 Excavate Land 2.1.1.2 Prep Footing & Foundation 2.1.1.3 City Inspection - Footing & Foundation 2.1.1.4 Pour Concrete - Footing & Foundation 2.1.1.5 Frame Building 2.1.1.6 Install Floor Sheathing 2.1.1.7 City Inspection - Framing 2.1.2...

Words: 2649 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

“Outline the Responsibilities of the Different Level of Government in the Uk.”

...Unit 1 P1 “Outline the responsibilities of the different level of government in the UK.” House of Commons – It is the lower house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The HoC is part of the legislative process of British Politics. It consists of 650 elected members of Parliament, who represent a board spectrum of political parties. Each MP represents a constituency, which is a localised geographical area. There are two ways in which people get elected, it can happen either during a general election or by-election. A big range of political views and interests are represented in the House of Commons, which enables the ‘House’ to ensure that legislation and decisions are well debated by a variety of different people, which political views differ. HoC has a lot of different roles, MP’s are responsible of debating and passing all laws (legislation), controlling finances, protecting the individuals, examining European proposals, and scrutinises the work of the government, policies and administration. Those roles may have extremely wide impact on the country and public services. House of Lords – It is the upper house, the Second chamber, and is also commonly referred to as “the Lords”. The House of Lords can have a variable amount of members. Currently, there are about 790 members who are eligible to take part in the work of the HoL. Members come from many walks of life and bring experience and knowledge from a wide range of occupations. Majority of them are life peers,......

Words: 2575 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Statement of Work

...furniture, case goods, and associated design, delivery and installation services for the project. The furniture supplier shall meet with ARMY North representative to determine the functional and aesthetic requirements for 24 workstations equal to or better than ALUR Panel Based system. It shall provide complete specifications including a detailed floor plan, specific model numbers complete with options and finish designations to satisfy the requirements of the customer. The approximate useable square footage (USF) for each room is as follows: Room 2215A -414 sq ft Chaplain-345 sq ft Room 2023-1240 sqft Room 2032-375 sqft Room 2230B-210 sqft The client agency Point of Contact (POC), also noted as the US Army North Project Manager (PM), will be the liaison at all times between the Furniture Contractor and other stakeholders. The Furniture Contractor will be required to comply with the requirements set forth by the Building Owner. The total number of new workstations is approximately 24. Separate sections in this RFQ package include: Attachment A Statement of Work Attachment B Furniture Typicals Attachment C Pricing Forms Attachment E Furniture Technical Characteristics Compliance Matrix Forms 2.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS 2.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS For any furniture procurement and installation, the contractor shall be responsible for assessing, evaluating, verifying, and confirming the conditions of the building, accessibility, site restrictions, parking,......

Words: 4893 - Pages: 20