...Cop cameras are slowly changing the ways of policing. The cameras are used to oversee a police officer's shift. The camera records all encounters of cops and civilians. Many people have expressed concerns over the use of the cameras because of personal privacy invasion. Police body cameras may go against the Fourth Amendment to a certain extent their benefits far outweigh these concerns. Police body cameras have been the talk of officers for many years. Police cams have been around since at least the 1960’s (Criminol). Cop cams were invented to prevent unlawful cops. They were also made to provide more accurate evidence of what happens with officers on the job. A long time ago officers first tried to use dash cams that were mounted inside the car. This posed issues of not recording quality videos. Another issue was that the camera did not getting the entire encounter of the officer and civilian. Eventually dash cams became less popular, since body cameras were invented. One issue is that, “Body cams will often capture people at their worst-drunk, abusive, profane, and at their most personal- during domestic disputes, mental health crises, medical emergencies, and etc” (Rutledge). With technology progressing the...
Words: 1671 - Pages: 7
...and striving to make them right. As time has developed, the issues of old have passed, but now, new ones have arose. Currently, sitting in 2015, the United States is again being subjected to another social issue; that is police brutality and the use of body cameras as a means of holding all parties involved accountable for their actions. It is simply irresponsible not to implement this new means of technology and I believe that it’s use is a key factor in solving the social issue of police brutality, and the untrust and stigmas that stem from this abuse of power. Names like Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, and Eric Garner have dominated headlines of many major news outlets for the past two years. The common factor between the three being the excessive use of force upon unarmed civilians. In the cases of Martin and Brown, both men were fatally shot, both were unarmed, and both had two conflicting sides of the story detailing the events leading up to and after their respective shootings. In each instance, many in the public were led to believe that racial stigmas were the determining reasons for the pulling of the trigger, and as a result mass protests and riots have occurred in towns such as but not limited to, Ferguson, Missouri and New York City. This is where body...
Words: 1013 - Pages: 5
...With the rampant police brutality going on in today’s society, many try and search for solutions that can alleviate this problem in some way. One potential way that could possibly prevent some of that brutality is the use of police body cameras. There are a few reasons why this would be useful. One obvious benefit is that use of force will decrease. Another is that people will be less likely to complain about police actions, which means less money spent on following up with those complaints. One of the potentially most useful benefits is that the cameras will give a clearer understanding in any case, making it unnecessary to speculate on a certain matter. Of course, there are some complications, since this is no clear-cut matter, with many viewpoints. Some assert that with body cameras, people who may not want to be on camera might end up there. Others say that according to recent events, police body cameras aren’t worth the hassle and their cost. Analyzing these points can lead us to an objective conclusion as to whether they really are worth their cost. Police body cameras can be used in order to decrease cops’ use of force. As the article “Should cops wear cameras?” by Brandon Griggs points...
Words: 602 - Pages: 3
...372 officers wear body cameras. Detectives wear them on their collar and helmet. Sometimes they will even put it on their sunglasses. Suspects won’t see it so they won't try to break the camera. Benefits of body cameras, drawbacks of police body cameras, and cops opinions, these 3 things should be something to look at. There are benefits of body cameras. The good things about police body cameras. When they had cameras, 0.07 out of 1000 use force. When they didn’t have cameras it was 0.7 out of 1000 that used force. It reduces the use of force from cops. It also reduced assaults from suspects. So when they had a camera it was 0.07 out of 1000 that use force. When they didn't have cameras 0.7 used force. It reduced force from both cops and suspects....
Words: 317 - Pages: 2
...In the field of Criminal Justice, there are many topics of controversy such as Police using body cameras. This topic is becoming a bigger issue around the country due to false accusations on people and police. There are pros and cons to every controversial issue. Four cons related to Police body cameras are the following: The cameras are expensive. There is a privacy issue for both police and civilians. There may be issues with the camera. The police don’t want them. On the positive side, there are pros as well. Four pros of police using body cameras are the following: Helps provide valuable evidence in obtaining accurate victim and witness statements. Protects police officers from false accusations. The use of cameras while on duty provides hard video evidence of...
Words: 1442 - Pages: 6
...Police Body Cameras Should police officers wear body cameras? The conflict in portland centers on how and when officers have access to video from body cameras. Videos of police shootings across the country have become critical. However police officers across the nation are beginning to push back on body cameras. Police officers should have to wear police body cameras. Some police stations are still debating on wether or not they should use police body cameras. State laws vary about what the public can see. Existing recordings are recovered under these laws, such as videos from cameras mount on patrol cars. “Body cameras produce more footage than dashboard cameras” (Kaleem). Footage that can show officers inside peoples homes. Body cameras have become an easy political answer to the problem of trust in police. Any policy that hides, shields, or opens up body-camera footage is probably wrong. Police body cameras created an issue on making a new contract between the city and the public union. Portlands labor agreement with...
Words: 490 - Pages: 2
...Should police officers be required to wear body cameras? Police officers have had their ups and downs with public citizens in the past years, making many citizens feel a loss of trust. However, there are many things the law enforcement system can do to increase citizens' trust. Finding an effective way to do this while still focusing on their jobs can be challenging. Many individuals argue on whether body-worn cameras are a benefit in solving this concern. However, police officers should use body cameras because they have received substantial support from citizens and are helping police officers lower their reports of misconduct. Firstly, since law enforcement started using body-worn cameras, police misconduct complaints have been lowered....
Words: 544 - Pages: 3
...This confrontation ended in the suspect being shot and killed. Officer Muniz was proven innocent because the footage from the body camera showed he didn’t do anything wrong. But in some cases, privacy is an issue in the release of footage. Because the trust in police officers is becoming non-existent, police body cameras are a rising solution that may have pros and cons. The attention of police body cameras has increased since the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri in August of 2014. Darren Wilson, a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, was found not guilty in the death of 18-year-old Michael Brown and Michael's family is begging for...
Words: 762 - Pages: 4
...Are police body cameras worth the price? Police stations across the country are questioning whether they should make police officers in America wear body cameras, and if the problems with the body cameras are worth the price police stations must pay. I think police officers in America should not have to wear the cameras because they are expensive, and the cameras raise huge privacy concerns. One major problem with the body cameras is the cost, according to one article “Just to equip the top 100 largest police stations in the world would cost well over a billion dollars” (Anastasia 23). If it cost that much to just purchase cameras for 100 police stations it would cost an a lot more to purchase them for every police station in the country, And put more cities and states in debt. Also, another article says, “Departments must also pay for storing the video”(stateline.org 1) On top of paying for the cameras police stations must also pay for storing the videos which most police stations can not afford to do. Most police stations are unsure how to pay for the cameras because they are so expensive....
Words: 602 - Pages: 3
...Police should wear body cameras at all times when they are present on the job. If a policeman is wearing a camera the person being approached will feel safer. Police will act in a better manner when the cameras are recording and attached to their uniforms. I agree that an officer should have the camera mounted on his uniform because we can see everything that happens.Police should wear body cameras because it reduces the force they will use, the camera provides efficient evidence in criminal prosecutions, and helps chiefs recognize a officers behavior. First of all , police should wear body cameras because the officer is less likely to use force and the interaction is changed between the police and a civilian because both are recorded. The University of Cambridge studies found that the use of force dropped by fifty percent when cameras are recording. Cops when encountering a civilian acts civilized and does not abuse his power because he knows everything is being recorded and he can not lie. In a previous situation the officer , George Zimmerman encountered a teenager , Trayvon Martin and killed him. There was not a camera on the police and there were no witnesses , so the policeman concluded a story. That is why there should be a camera on any officer that is on duty so he can not commit murder and deceive his way out of it. Police will not be Taylor 2 able to get off as easily as before and they...
Words: 1029 - Pages: 5
...many people putting rumors of police brutality out to the public, some people may feel unsafe with the police. Police should wear body cameras because it can give evidence, would show how an officer reacts to every situation ,and it would give people the feeling of safety. "Why did he have to do that," says a victims parent. With so many claims of people being shot for no apparent reason, it is hard to not be afraid that they are right. If you put a body camera on an officer and someone says they are abusing power, we would know who was in the wrong during an official trial. For example, you can see people being abused by a police officer. A police sergeant was shown instructing a citizen that they are not allowed to record a traffic stop. He is saying it is a new state law except there is no suck law in North Carolina... He was stopped at a labeled drug house picking up someone as a taxi. As he recorded the incident the officer pulled our a drug dog, and...
Words: 685 - Pages: 3
...Brentyn Trujillo Period 3 11/3/2015 Police should wear body cameras at all times while on duty. Police officers should be forced to wear body cameras while on their patrol duty. Equipping police with body cameras may be an effective way to advance the behavior of officers and the community with which they interact, a new study finds. Researchers at the Campus of South Florida released their report on a yearlong body-worn camera pilot program at the Orlando Police Department, in which they randomly selected 46 officers to wear the plans and compared them against 43 officers who did not. In the 12 months from March 2014 through February 2015, use-of-force events also known as "response to resistance" events fell 53 percent amongst officers with...
Words: 970 - Pages: 4
...should be required to wear body cameras? Police dashboards cameras have been used in some law enforcement agencies for several year but the people and the government think it is time for the officers to wear body cameras to catch every move the officers make while on patrol. Police Officers should be required to use body cameras because it can help reduce the amount of force used on a suspect, it reduces the need to be dishonest, and helps improve the relationship with the people and the police force. To begin with, Police officers wearing body cameras can reduce the amount of force used on a suspect. Officer have been using too much force on the suspects that the civilians are disagreeing with the officer’s ways of handing thing. According to the article “The Right Body Camera Policy” states “This...
Words: 651 - Pages: 3
...Police Worn Body Cameras: A Step in the Right Direction Andrew Cordier ENG122: English Composition II Instructor Amy Morris August 18, 2016 There have been numerous advances in technology in recent years and some include law enforcement. Over the years, there have been huge strides in the technological advances in surveillance. Police Departments are one of these groups who have seen an increase in surveillance technology like dashboard mounted cameras, and now law enforcement agencies are looking to equip their officers with body cameras that can be worn on an officer’s lapel, glasses, and on their chest. The idea of equipping officers with these body cameras has been a hot topic of debate in light of recent past events, such as the unarmed shooting of Michael Brown by Officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson Missouri Mandatory use of body cameras should be put into place because it will protect civilians from the use of excessive force and hold officers responsible for their actions, not invade the privacy of both the public and police officers with the proper guidelines in place, and lower the rates of police use of excessive force, while lowering the rates of false claims against officers. With more and more cases of use of excessive force against civilians, people across America are becoming outraged by the actions of police officers and feel that taking the word of an officer is no longer good enough to explain their actions. Americans across the nation want answers...
Words: 1972 - Pages: 8
...Do you feel safe should cops wear body cameras? deathns linked to police brutallity has increased from 397 to 426 deaths anually before jumping to 461 in 2013. a way of preventing this is body cameras for police officers. There is a lot of debat wether [olice officers should wear body cams or not. the reasons i think the officers should be forced to wear these devices is police brutality,accountability for officers actions and the footage from the body cams can be used for evidence in police brutality cases.I personally think that poice officers should have to wear body camers for there saftey and citizens saftey and so people in general can feel more safe around police offficers. police brutallity is one reason that police officers should wear body cameras many cases of police brutality have been reported in the media is one of the most popular case the trayvon martin case where a young boy at the age of seventeen...
Words: 647 - Pages: 3
