Free Essay

Political Since

In: Other Topics

Submitted By SINDYYY
Words 4034
Pages 17
|1 | |
|Politics and political science | |
| |
| |

| | | |
| | | |
| | |Political science is the study of politics in all its aspects. Occasionally politics is used as a synonym for political science: sometimes| | |
| | |as the title of university departments of political science. This may be confusing. Although a few political scientists have become | | |
| | |politicians, and even more rarely politicians have become political scientists, the activities of the two, despite impinging on each | | |
| | |other, are quite different. | | |
| | | |
| | | |

| | | |
| | | |
| | |1.1 What is politics? | | |
| | | |
| | | |

| | | |
| | | |
| | |Politics can be regarded in at least four ways. | | |
| | | |
| | | |

| | | |
| | | |
| | |1.1.1 Politics as an activity | | |
| | | |
| | | |

| | | |
| | | |
| | |Politics is an activity indulged in, either full-time or part-time, by politicians. They are concerned with some or all of the collective | | |
| | |decisions that affect the political unit they live in. It could be a small sub-unit like a parish, or it could be the central government. | | |
| | |In most societies there is a divide between politicians and the rest of the citizenry who choose to play only a minimal part in | | |
| | |decision-making for the collectivity. The politicians have become professionalized - they are professional politicians. But hypothetically| | |
| | |there is no reason why there should be such a divide. There are small communities in existence where all adults participate in making | | |
| | |decisions for the whole body politic. | | |
| | | |
| | | |

| | | |
| | | |
| | |Yet to say 'politics is an activity' is merely the beginning of wisdom. The activity is pursued quite variously in different contexts. In | | |
| | |some it is the occasion of great antagonisms. Not all politicians, by any means, want every proposal adopted: on the contrary, they may | | |
| | |try to prevent most of them succeeding. In some societies policies will be imposed by rulers and opposition may not be allowed. Here there| | |
| | |will be only a few politicians imposing their own decisions. Hence there are numerous | | |
| | | | | |
| | |types of political regime (see Chapter 4 below) and numerous kinds of political activity. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |1.1.2 Politics as 'current affairs' | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |To much of the non-political public, politics is a part of life with which they do not want to be involved. Indeed, to some it is | | |
| | |disreputable and dangerous. Contention must be avoided: 'politics and religion are two things one should not talk about' is a much-quoted | | |
| | |adage. But some citizens are quite interested and view political goings-on as they might a spectator sport. They support political parties| | |
| | |as they support football teams, cheering from the sidelines. Students who take up political science often start from the angle of current | | |
| | |affairs, a very useful approach to the subject. Another compendious and similar term is 'political life'. Foreign wars, what politicians | | |
| | |do and say, praise and abuse of them, commentaries in the papers and on radio and television about their personal lives, gladiatorial | | |
| | |argument between them, elections and party politics - all these may be included under the rubric of politics as current affairs. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |1.1.3 Politics as what the government does | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |To govern is to control and all communities at an early stage of development will be concerned with the problem of control. The actions of| | |
| | |those who control - the rulers, the incumbent government - may be perceived as politics. Where dissent is not possible this will be the | | |
| | |only manifestation of politics. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |1.1.4 Politics as conflict and the resolution of conflict | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Conflict is here used in a wide sense to mean contestation, including any form of disagreement. Indeed, all group interrelationships will | | |
| | |be involved with differences, even when compromise between the parties is regularised and institutionalised. Physical contestation is an | | |
| | |extreme form of conflict. An initial assumption is that disagreement is very common. People disagree about objectives to be reached and | | |
| | |they disagree about how to reach them. If there were no disagreement there would be no need for politics: to use old-fashioned terms, | | |
| | |people disagree about ends and they disagree about means. Problems are likely to be resolved sooner or later and the role of the | | |
| | |politician is to participate in the resolution. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Disagreement, of course, may occur at a personal level about quite trivial matters. Indeed, S. E. Finer, Professor of Political | | |
| | |Institutions at | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Keele, used to begin his lectures with the parable of two dogs fighting over an indivisible bone. One would eventually get it and the | | |
| | |other dog would be dissatisfied with the outcome. But combat is not the only method of resolving disagreement. Brian Barry also lists | | |
| | |contests (running a race or a boxing match), drawing lots, authoritative determination by setting up an arbitrator, bargaining, discussion| | |
| | |on merits and voting.1 While most of these are not appropriate to dogs they are all possible with human beings. Collective social | | |
| | |objectives are not analogous to bones and people who disagree about them can choose several other methods of resolving their disputes. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |This does not rule out combat, but many will feel that this is a risky and unpleasant way of resolving conflict. Foes defeated in war may | | |
| | |replenish their arsenals, reinvigorate their morale and attempt revenge. Thus a victor in war should perhaps kill all enemies to be | | |
| | |secure, which is not always very practical. Hence a sensible way of settling conflict may be one that maintains a certain stability, peace| | |
| | |and order in society. Many see this as the basic problem in politics. It is also the best justification for politics that it is concerned | | |
| | |with the resolution of conflict with as little disorder as possible. As Bernard Crick points out, this is something that Aristotle was | | |
| | |aware of when he said politics was the 'master science'.2 It is an activity that calls for great skill, flair, experience and knowledge to| | |
| | |be used in the service of resolving social conflicts that will destroy society if they are not resolved. This also includes, in the last | | |
| | |resort, dealing with the allocation of scarce material resources. Markets cannot do this if people draw guns in them. A framework of law | | |
| | |must be maintained if markets are to allocate freely. Thus political activity determines the continuation or discontinuation of all other | | |
| | |activities and studies. That politics may be a necessary activity for a decent existence is something only anarchists will disagree with, | | |
| | |though some forms of political activity may end in a very indecent existence. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |If conflict is to be resolved rationally and peaceably on a regular basis, conditions must be devised allowing discussion and consultation| | |
| | |with compromise, possibly, as the final end. Once such procedures are stabilised we have a set of institutions a political system. (see | | |
| | |Chapter 6) Structures of this kind can only exist within a framework of order. For them to exist for long, rules must be drawn up at first| | |
| | |they may be accepted customs but later they will be written and promulgated and steps taken to see they are observed. Law can only be | | |
| | |sustained where there is a framework of order. This explains why the term 'international society' (see Chapter 25) is only a hope and an | | |
| | |aspiration: international law cannot be enforced because there are no effective forces of order. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |To sum up: politics is a term with several usages. Fundamentally | | |
| | | | | |
| | |however, political activity is concerned with conflictual activity and its resolution in the widest sense. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |1.2 What is political science? | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Political science is the study of politics in all its dimensions. At least four can be distinguished. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |1.2.1 Political science as philosophy and theory | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Early study of politics took place in small communities. The ancient Greeks who asked many of the important questions (and answered some | | |
| | |of them well enough to satisfy many people today) lived in city states where rulers and decision-making were not remote. Their primary | | |
| | |concern was with the nature of the good and just society and what the attitude of the citizen should be towards authority. The nature of | | |
| | |our obligation to our rulers became an important theme in the early study of politics. Why do we obey the state? (see Chapter 3). | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |The easy answer to this question is that people obey out of habit. It does not occur to them to disobey. In modern times the question | | |
| | |might be answered by anthropologists studying primitive societies, or by psychologists studying small groups of people and their response | | |
| | |to leadership in laboratory situations. The ancient philosophers believed the answer lay in the nature of man. Aristotle perceived man as | | |
| | |an animal of the polis: outside society people could not attain true happiness. The real nature of man could only be realised by | | |
| | |associating with others. He assumed that the good life lay in the polity and that legally constituted government was the natural form, so | | |
| | |that corruptions of good government were aberrations. Hence harmony was more natural than conflict. Neither Plato nor Aristotle seems to | | |
| | |have conceived that disagreement could be irreconcilable. Christian philosophers believed that authority came from God and, therefore, | | |
| | |should be obeyed. Later dynastic rulers transformed this into the claim that hereditary rulers were appointed by divine law and so | | |
| | |disobeying them was unthinkable. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Once the acknowledgement of basic disagreement arose the question of political obligation either disappeared or became far more | | |
| | |complicated. The Scientific Revolution, the Renaissance, the Reformation and finally the eighteenth-century Enlightenment removed many of | | |
| | |the old certainties. Machiavelli (1469-1527), who had been imprisoned and tortured by rulers' commands, believed people were fickle and | | |
| | |prone to evil. He was the holder of high office at the period of the expulsion, and then reinstatement, of the Medici in Florence. | | |
| | |Instability- | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |he held, could always be round the corner. When the safety of the country is ultimately in question, he wrote, there must be no question | | |
| | |of justice or injustice, of mercy or cruelty, of praise or ignominy. It was not a matter of obligation, but of success or failure. | | |
| | |Similarly Hobbes (1588-1679), writing in the period of the English Civil War and religious intolerance, perceived man's nature as fearful | | |
| | |in consequence of the struggle for survival. People battled against one another to achieve their ends and in consequence life was 'nasty, | | |
| | |brutish and short'. Hence a sovereign was needed to enforce law and order. We obey the sovereign because if people start disobeying | | |
| | |everyone will be miserable in a state of mutual conflict. It is not a moral obligation, it is a necessity. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |From the late seventeenth century onward the question of the relationship between the individual and the state generally shifted from the | | |
| | |obligation to obey to the circumstances in which one could disobey. It was argued by John Locke (1632-1704) that rulers rule with the | | |
| | |consent of their people with whom they have a contract. If the ruler breaches their individual rights the people have a right to replace | | |
| | |him. This justification of the English Revolution of 1688, when Parliament replaced a hereditary monarch it disapproved of, became an | | |
| | |inspiration for the American Revolutionaries. Thus the study of political thought turned to constitutional liberalism and the need to | | |
| | |control powerful government. Montesquieu (1689-1755) believed that this could only be done by separating the powers of the judiciary, | | |
| | |legislature and executive from each other. Rousseau (1712-1778), with his belief in equality and sovereignty belonging to the people, | | |
| | |challenged all previous ideas about authority. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |After the American and French Revolutions obedience was no longer either a habit or an accepted and expected pattern of behaviour. | | |
| | |Conflict among the people, who were rarely even 90 per cent in favour of any proposal, had to be assumed. The arrival of the Common Man | | |
| | |and the pluralistic society meant that philosophic thinking about politics could no longer be the simple matter of the relationship | | |
| | |between the individual and the state. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |This is only the briefest summary of that part of most political science syllabuses known as political philosophy or political theory. (In| | |
| | |Chapters 2 and 3 more recent developments are discussed.) It is possible to make a distinction between these two rubrics. Political | | |
| | |philosophy is more concerned with implicit assumptions and internal logic, while political theory tends to be more related to intellectual| | |
| | |influences and to cultural and historical environments, but the terms are sometimes used interchangeably. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |1.2.2 Political science as the study of conflict | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |At its core political science is concerned with the study of conflict. This can take place at several levels. Personal conflict, usually | | |
| | |studied by psychologists, can be of service to political scientists. The study of aggressive instincts, for example, or the ability to | | |
| | |compromise are obvious examples and these themes can also apply to group conflict. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Collective conflict is obviously the main field of investigation. It is of a different order from personal conflict because it involves | | |
| | |all sorts of considerations about group coherence and group fragmentation. Political sociologists investigate for what reasons and to what| | |
| | |extent people identify with others and to what degree they emphasise their distinction from those in other groups. When a group achieves a| | |
| | |level of continuous existence, develops rules and decision-making procedures and systematically begins to recruit members, it is called an| | |
| | |'association'. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |The part of the subject variously called political institutions or comparative institutions (see below) is involved with the study of | | |
| | |conflict within the framework of a set of institutions. A political institution is a public body with formally designated structures and | | |
| | |functions intended to regulate defined activities applying to the whole population. Governments, parliaments and the law courts are | | |
| | |political institutions. Their interrelationships are defined in constitutions. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Collective conflict may take place at three levels at that of local associations, at that of national associations and at that of nation | | |
| | |states. Often collective conflict takes the form of a clash between those associations and interests involved in the government and those | | |
| | |outside it. In authoritarian regimes (see Chapter 4), however, where governments rule virtually unchallenged, conflict at the first two | | |
| | |levels is submerged or likely to be repressed. Unless there is one-man rule, however, there will be conflict in private cabals. Such | | |
| | |situations are not easy for the researcher to examine. Conversely, the study of politics in democracies, where conflict is permitted and | | |
| | |even encouraged and where it often takes place publicly, is so much easier. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |The study of conflict between local groups may be made at the community level. It may be about the building of a new bypass or the closing| | |
| | |of a footpath. Increasingly nationwide groups associate themselves with such matters, but there may be other local issues, such as a | | |
| | |dispute between travellers and local landowners, which proceed no further than local government. In the Western world physical conflict at| | |
| | |this level is rare, but there are areas where internal disputes, especially ethnic rivalries, deteriorate into armed conflict. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |A very large proportion of the literature of political science is con | | |
| | |cerned with conflict between nationally organised associations. There are two kinds of political association: pressure groups and | | |
| | |political parties (see Chapter 10). Pressure groups do not want to participate in governing, although they do want to obtain access to the| | |
| | |decision making process and to influence its outcome. Unlike parties they usually have a specific political objective. Parties tend to be | | |
| | |coalitions of interests with many objectives concerned to govern or share in the task of governing. Political scientists sometimes study | | |
| | |one of these organisations separately as a political system in itself: usually within large pressure groups and parties there are factions| | |
| | |in conflict. At other times relationships between different groups are examined. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |It should be said that increasingly pressure groups operate on an international scale and lobby at international conferences the so called| | |
| | |non-governmental groups (NGOS). This is particularly the case with women's and environmental groups. (see Chapter 5). | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Collective group conflict of this kind would usually be included in the study of comparative institutions where the role of associations | | |
| | |in relation to political institutions, especially legislatures and executives, is clearly a necessary component (see Chapters 6-10) Wider | | |
| | |study of the social and cultural backgrounds of association memberships and leaderships is likely to be dealt with under the heading of | | |
| | |political sociology. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |1.2.3 Political science as international relations | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Conflict between states is the core of international relations (see Chapter 21). This is sometimes taught in departments separate from | | |
| | |political science. It can be argued that the subject matter is quite different because there is no such thing as international society | | |
| | |(see Chapter 25) or world government. A world system does not exist: world society is an unregulated state of nature. On the other hand, | | |
| | |as Michael Sheehan argues, some societal elements international courts of law and world declarations of human rights can be seen and are | | |
| | |growing in importance. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |1.2.4 Political science as the study of institutions | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Political scientists are also involved with the resolution of conflict in policy-making and decision-making and the imposition of | | |
| | |decisions once they are finalised. Here there is scope for numerous fields of study. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |In most developed states a good deal of decision-making, certainly the most visible part, is standardised by procedural rules, | | |
| | |institutional processes and constitutions. The study of political institutions is a major part of the discipline. Frequently the political| | |
| | |institutions of | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |one country are studied, but quite as often countries and their political institutions are compared under the heading of comparative | | |
| | |institutions. The subject may require knowledge of constitutional law, historical background and social and cultural environment. It is | | |
| | |the framework which shapes the political life of countries and within which decision-making takes place. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |The imposition, or implementation, of decisions once they are made is another wide field of study. The modern state has a large apparatus | | |
| | |of administrators concerned with applying the numerous laws which modern legislatures produce (see Chapter 4). This apparatus, or | | |
| | |bureaucracy, needs coordination and supervision. As its officials are often appointed for life while the incumbency of democratic | | |
| | |politicians is transitory, the bureaucracy may also wield some power. All these themes come under the heading of public administration | | |
| | |(see Section Four) which was one of the early foundations on which university political science was built. It has always been concerned | | |
| | |with management and in recent years management studies has partly developed from it. In addition, the study of policy-making has become | | |
| | |important because of the increasing degree to which specialised administrators, or technocrats, have moved away from the role of the | | |
| | |neutral administrator as a mere implementer of policy. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Political scientists are also concerned to study reasons for the maintenance and breakdown of political systems. Rebellions and | | |
| | |revolutions are, after all, not uncommon and even apparently stable regimes have been known to collapse. The Russian Revolution in 1917 | | |
| | |and the dramatic and sudden collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989-90 are both evidence of political forces erupting in authoritarian | | |
| | |states. Even more alarming to liberals are instances of the collapse of democracy as in Germany in the late 1920s and early 1930s and, | | |
| | |more recently, in Greece in 1967. Thus the conditions underlying stability are a natural subject of study. This leads to the investigation| | |
| | |of social and other cleavages within states their depth and intensity and how to deal with them. Surprisingly, political scientists have | | |
| | |not been active in studying political skills. The art of diplomacy in both domestic and international settings has been somewhat | | |
| | |neglected. Only in the area of international relations has crisis management received any attention. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |In recent years attention has turned to the environments which affect conflict and its resolution. Especially the economic and social | | |
| | |environments of the political system have interested political scientists, leading them to study the areas where the polity overlaps with | | |
| | |the economy and society. These two areas are known repectively as political economy and political sociology. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Political economy | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |This was a seventeenth-century term meaning the public management of the affairs of the state. The contemporary mercantilist doctrine | | |
| | |implied that those with political power controlled the economy. There are several reasons why interest in relations between politics and | | |
| | |the economy have revived in recent decades. The most obvious is the importance of the economy for democratic politicians. A perception of | | |
| | |prosperity is a great help towards winning elections and the reverse is true: a feeling of depression is bad for incumbent governments at | | |
| | |the polls. Consequently governments are bound to be tempted to manipulate the economy. Political scientists have identified a 'political | | |
| | |business cycle' showing that boosts to the economy are often administered in the months before elections. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |The influence, however, is not all one way. An unstable political system can ruin an economy. Visible examples from the developing world | | |
| | |are not difficult to find. Political scientists who study development perceive political development as part of the process of | | |
| | |modernisation. For the political system this implies the development of specialisation, structural differentiation, accommodation with | | |
| | |pluralism and secularisation. It presumes the growth of a bureaucracy and, perhaps, democracy in the end. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |There have also been attempts by political scientists to borrow economists' models. (Models are dealt with in Chapter 6). One wellknown | | |
| | |example is the analogy between oligopoly, a market with few sellers, and a state with only a few political parties. Another more | | |
| | |fundamental one is the claim that the individual voter, faced with an array of policy options to choose from, is in an analogous situation| | |
| | |with the sovereign consumer in the market. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Political sociology | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |The relationship between political science and sociology proceeded in rather the same fashion, from empiricism towards model-building. It | | |
| | |was the study of electorates and their motives which led to the conceptualization of political culture (culture is a term whose origins | | |
| | |are in anthropology see Chapter 6). This is the set of beliefs, attitudes and values which people hold towards their political system. | | |
| | |Then the concept of socialisation, the process through which people are prepared to participate in social systems, was borrowed to | | |
| | |construct the concept of political socialisation, the process by which people become aware of their political systems. Other political | | |
| | |scientists studying public opinion became interested in propaganda and mass behaviour (on the margins of psychology, though political | | |
| | |psychology, as yet, is an infant social science). | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |A further borrowing from sociology relates to social systems as integrating and stabilising agents, a notion first advanced by Talcott | | |
| | |Parsons. 3 David Easton produced a more sophisticated model with input and output functions that owed much to computer systems (see | | |
| | |Chapter 6). | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |1.3 Is political science a science? | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Natural scientists sometimes complain about the description of the study of politics as a science. They argue that it cannot be a science | | |
| | |because, unlike the natural sciences: | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |1. The variables in political science are not all subject to measurement. Its elements are not like matter whose weight, volume, | | |
| | |temperature and so on can be quantified. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |2. Unlike natural scientists, political scientists cannot set up experiments with what are apparently the same ingredients, in the same | | |
| | |conditions and produce the same results. Environments cannot be controlled as in a laboratory. The ingredients change because they are | | |
| | |human. For example, there can be contagion in that they can learn from each other. They also learn from their experiences and may behave | | |
| | |quite differently from one situation to another that appears to be similar. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |3. Therefore political scientists can never accurately predict. (Of course, this may also apply to some natural sciences such as | | |
| | |meteorology, seismology, zoology.) | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |Most political scientists accept these objections. They believe the best reason for calling their subject political science is to | | |
| | |distinguish it from politics. (Incidentally, no one seems to object to domestic science as a term to cover the culinary and home-building | | |
| | |arts.) Science is merely a derivation of the Latin word for knowledge. The argument began with the political behaviouralists who saw | | |
| | |numeracy as the key to science and believed quantification of data and analysis by statistical testing would allow them to test the | | |
| | |validity of hypotheses. Unfortunately although hypotheses can be presented the results only have validity within a small space and a short| | |
| | |time. Moreover, much political data cannot be quantified and the number of variables, anyway, is enormous. Political scientists may claim | | |
| | |they are value-freethere is objectivity in their approach but they cannot make authoritative statements of the same universal validity as | | |
| | |natural scientists. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | |'Man is a political animal.' Discuss. | | |
| | |‘If there were no disagreement there would be no politics.' Discuss. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Unit 1 Ip Busn 300

...Global Warming: Fact or Fiction AIU Lower Division Capstone BUSN 300 Outline Introduction/Thesis: I. History of Global Warming A. A driving force for the argument 1. A debate that global warming is in fact a fiction 2. A debate that global warming is a fact II. Argumentation A. The Melting Glaciers B. Weather that is Difficult to Follow Conclusion/Closing: Global Warming: Fact or Fiction For years the glaciers have been melting and catching people’s attention, this has resulted in the rise of over 6 in. in the sea level where as a hundred years ago it was much lower. This raises the question as to whether global warming is a fact or fiction. Literature on global warming is comprised mostly on intelligent discussion on having "too much caution on global warming" (Nature, 1991) or "global warming is real" (Kerr, 1989, p. 603) rather than fiction. Let me break this down for you people, society is using to much resources and energy in assuring ourselves that global warming is in fact an issue at all. The top debate in favor of global warming being fiction is the lack of scientific evidence connecting the emissions of greenhouse gases as a result of human activity with global warming (Brown, 2010, p. 26). First and for most any connection at all is completely uncertain and there is no proof. Then we also have, people in today’s that say global warming is a fact and say that society, "have caused a number of environment issues, such as global...

Words: 826 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Political Parties

...Huri Tursan, Democratisation in Turkey: The Role of Political Parties, Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang, 2004. Comparative studies on regime changes in Southern Europe and Latin America have shown the central role that stable and strong party systems play in the consolidation of democracy. Although Turkish political parties and the party system have received considerable scholarly attention, their impact on the country’s democratization process has not been systematically examined. Huri Tursan’s book seeks to fill this gap in the literature on contemporary Turkish politics. A modified version of the author’s doctoral dissertation written at the European University Institute in Florence, the study describes the historical evolution of political parties, with particular focus on developments concerning party politics since Turkey’s transition from an authoritarian one-party regime to a multi-party system in the late 1940s. The bulk of the book analyzes the changing electoral fortunes of the individual parties over the past five decades, the impact of the breakdowns of democracy through military interventions in 1960, 1971, and 1980 on party competition, and trends in the party system over the years. The analysis of the changes in the party system concerning volatility, fragmentation, and polarization constitute the book’s main empirical contribution. The picture that emerges from Hursan’s study is that of a party system which lacks strong and cohesive parties and which has experienced...

Words: 755 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Importance of Trust in States and Firms

...focus determining if trust is indeed fundamental, or necessary to every organisation. Since trust usually suggests a relationship between 2 or more parties, the essay will look into how trust is established between organisation and define trust. Later on, the economic benefits of trust will be explained and lastly, the importance of trust will be evaluated. Trust and the state The Corruption Perception Index (CPI) is an The CPI is an example of measuring a state’s economic legitimacy based on an empirical understanding, seeking to shed light on the economic and political legitimacy of a regime by reviewing international institutions’ perception on the transparency and corruption of the state. Every year, Transparency International releases a CPI report on countries around the globe. The annual report (Transparency International 2013) measures countries according to the perceived level of corruption, reflecting the level of trust in the accountability of each state. In this section of the essay, we point our attention to the state and trust is defined as the ‘belief in legitimacy’ (Rostboll 2013). Such formalised documentation of trust between neutral international institutions and the state is particularly important since it influences the establishment of accountability with other multinational corporations and companies. Departing from Weber’s theory that every system of political domination is dependent on the people’s belief in its legitimacy (Rostboll 2013)...

Words: 1141 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Political Corruption

...Political corruption, as been defined by the World Banks, is the abuse of public office for personal or private gain (worldbank.org 1). This is definition is both objective and sufficiently enough to describe and to summarize all types of political corruptions that are happening all around the world. The keyword is private gain which include monetary or non-monetary benefits that the officer will receive whenever he or she misuse his or her power to disturb the competitive advantage of the free market system. Political corruption exists in various ways such as bribery, theft, bureaucratic corruption, system corruption and many more, which often executes in the most profound but complex ways. The causes of corruption is hard to simplify since political corruption always have deeply rooted in a region’s policies, bureaucracies, systems and not surprisingly history. However, the costs of it can be easily identify by looking at the most of the time below-par performance of both public and private sector. This happens when government interfere when they do not need to, therefore undermine implementation of both public policies and free market system. By the standard of irrefutable of a great nation, who can believe that the great nation of United States of America is corrupt? There sure have been couples of financial scandal in the past but there have never been a time where United States senator or other political officers to be involved in side dealing, vote-trading, log rolling...

Words: 879 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

How Successful Were Attempts to Establish Democracy in the Newly Dependent States of Southeast Asia?

... it is crucial to note that democracy meant that the state was ruled by the people, and existed in either in the liberal form or the parliamentary form. Additionally, one needs to consider the features of Western-style democracy, politically and economically. A democratic political model would have the presence of multi-party, free and fair elections as well as the separation of powers amongst the leaders of the country. A democratic economic model would adopt capitalism that promotes free trade and economic stability. (C) With these in mind, the assumption put forth by the question holds as we recognise that there were attempts, to establish democracy. (A) However, there were varying degrees of success when carrying out said attempts if one closely looks into individual features of democracy that was present (or not present) in the countries. (C) Therefore if one looks into the amount of presence of a democratic feature in the countries, it was to large extent that the attempts were successful. However, when one looks at the countries holistically the attempts to establish democracy was successful to only to a small extent throughout 1945-1997. (T) If democracy equates to the presence of many political parties,...

Words: 1564 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Essay : to What Extent Does Democracy in the Uk Suffer from a ‘Participation Crisis’?

...crisis’? Political participation is defined as opportunities for and tendencies of the people to become involved in the political process. At a minimum level this will involve voting, but may also involve active work in political parties and pressure groups. At the higher/highest level it implies standing for public office. However with regards to the United Kingdom suffering from a participation crisis, I would like to agree. Simply because, there has been a low turnout at general elections, which undermines the mandate of the government and threatens the idea that the UK is a representative democracy. Between 1922 and 1997 turnout remained above 71%. At the 2001 general election the turnout was59.4%; in 2005 it was 61.4%; in 2010 it was 65.1%; and in 2015 it was66.1%. Various people may consider the minor increase in percentage but overall there has not been a significant increase. Key forms of participation, such as voting and party membership have declined significantly over time, but other newer, faster forms have arisen and are slowly becoming more popular to the newer generations such as Referendums, particularly in Scotland. Popular engagement with the formal processes and institutions of democracy has been in long – term decline since the 1960’s. The turnout in 2001 was the lowest; this is compared to how between 1945 and 1992 it was always about 75 percent. Through this, it can be seen that recently, judging from the most blatant way to assess political contribution...

Words: 1334 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Politica Risk in a Global Scale

...POLITICAL RISK Globalization is the name of the game, every business and individual has a direct or indirect connection with it. Even in the tightest locked-up economy, there is a level of dependence with the global economy. Brands and products have managed to break the national frontiers and sail the murky waters of international markets. The 21st century has seen a more regulated and somewhat “fair” and competitive playfield. International organizations, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), have gained strength while working to ensure a firm and stable environment for trade and payments at a global scale. Smaller, regional organizations also play a strong hand and trade regulations can be found at a country and state level. This colossal amount of regulations and regulators aim, for the most part, to establish a fair environment for the benefit of both the consumers and the companies; yet, these regulations pose great, and sometimes hidden, risks. But these regulatory risks represent one of the many institutional differences companies may face when entering a foreign market. In order to have a better understanding of the potential political risks, one must study, not only the current state of the targeted area, but also the historical context and analyze examples of other companies in similar situations. Sometimes the industry, or even the area are not the same, but the knowledge gained is still valuable and many points can...

Words: 3900 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

A Government

...refer to the person or group of people exercising authority over a politically organized territory.[5][6] Finally, government is also sometimes used in English as a synonym for governance. In the case of its broad associative definition, government normally consists of legislators, administrators, and arbitrators. Government is the means by which state policy is enforced, as well as the mechanism for determining the policy of the state. A form of government, or form of state governance, refers to the set of political systems and institutions that make up the organisation of a specific government. Government of any kind currently affects every human activity in many important ways. For this reason, political scientists generally argue that government should not be studied by itself; but s In political science, it has long been a goal to create a typology or taxonomy of polities, as typologies of political systems are not obvious.[7] It is especially important in the political science fields of comparative politics and international relations. On the surface, identifying a form of government appears to be simple, as all governments have an official form. The United States is a federal republic, while the former Soviet Union was a socialist republic. However self-identification is not objective, and as Kopstein and Lichbach argue, defining regimes can be tricky.[8] For example, elections are a defining characteristic...

Words: 676 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

What Is Politics?

...politics is about the government holding beliefs to aim for an organization to benefit for themselves and have small interest to the citizens. In fact this view of politics cannot be denied when looking at such examples from the past and now. 2. Politics in the Past 2.1 The Root of Politics When did politics start? This question cannot be answered, as there are no specific dates of when it had started. If there were an answer to this question, probably the start of mankind would have been the beginning of politics, since the nature of politics is very similar to that of rule and control. Countries that had monarchs, for instance a country that was ruled by kings and emperors were classified as divine; a more like authoritarian government style. Until the French revolution, this divine was the absolute and most common way of ruling a country. These monarchs can be dated as early as 2100 BC in Sumeria, which is said to be one of the longest and lasting political institutions in the world. Even though the king had absolute power over ruling the country, there were still supports from experienced advisors. It is said that the presence of these advisors were one of the factors in creating a constitutional monarchy, which had lead to today’s constitutional government. 2.2 The Foundation of the Term “Politics” The idea of politics has been...

Words: 950 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Philosophical Essay

...[Name of Student] [Name of Instructor] [Course Code] [Date of Submission] An Essay on Politics, Politicians and Political Parties When the term politician is mentioned, we immediately think of a person of honor. At times, we think that the person may most likely have a criminal record especially if the politician is from a developing country. Another thought is that the person is from a royal family as a prince, king or emperor. Politicians in most cases are entangled in controversies. We tend to see them begging for votes during or around the election time. The often have many promises to the electorate being put across using slogans, posters, and sweet words. These promises give false hopes to the citizens. Almost every time after these elections, these hopes are shattered, and the people then realize they made a mistake to put the politicians in power. In addition, the issue of elections rigging is often the case diluting the effort of the people who were targeting positive change in the governance of their country. The citizens are usually the ones that are greatly affected by corrupt leadership. We, therefore, tend to ask ourselves whether the problem is with the leadership or use of the electorate. Do we lack the ability to choose good leaders? Is the political seat by itself responsible for turning all people that aspire for it to be corrupt? If there is a lack of our abilities to choose a good leader, then action should be taken to decide wisely during elections...

Words: 1341 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Goverment and Politics

...Curtice and Ben Seyd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Britain is widely believed to be suffering a crisis of democracy. This briefing examines whether this perception is justified or not. Our findings - which are based on a four year research project funded by the ESRC - address four key issues: the legitimacy of governments, patterns of participation in politics, the impact of constitutional reform, and the explanation for any crisis. Legitimacy There has been a decline in levels of trust in government and confidence in the political system. Thirty years ago, four in ten people in Britain trusted government to put the needs of the nation above those of their political party; today, just one in five do so. But much of this decline set in during the early 1990s, although trust and confidence have fallen further since 1997. Participation Turnout at all elections has declined since 1997, most noticeably at the 2001 general election, when the participation rate was the lowest since 1918. At the same time, levels of non-electoral participation have increased somewhat. Meanwhile, it is not the case that people engage outside the ballot box as an alternative to voting; rather, most people use non-electoral activities as a complement to participating at elections. One reason why non-electoral participation has not declined is because people generally feel as engaged with the...

Words: 7074 - Pages: 29

Premium Essay

Mr. Idowu Oluwasegun

...THE CONSTITUTION OF REALITY INTRODUCTION Spinoza’s political thought draws from a number of sources, both classical and modern. As one commentator puts it “Spinoza formed new conclusions from facts and concept borrowed from others”. It is worth briefly considering some of the sources of the facts and concepts that he inherits. At some point in the Mid-1650’s (around the time of his cherem, or excommunication) Spinoza began studying Latin with Francisus Van Den Enden. Van Den Enden was an ex–Jesuit and radical egalitarian with revolutionary tendencies. He was out to death in 1674 after Laring izech found guilty of conspiring to depose Louis XIV in order to establish a free republic in Normandy. Van Dan Enden was an anti–clerical democrat with appears to have profoundly influenced Spinoza. One commentators has gone so far as to call Van Dan Enden’s genius behind Spinoza, claiming that Van Den Enden’s writing contain a political theory which is in fact the same as the one worked out by Spinoza. Whether or not this assessment is fair, it is clear that Spinoza’s thinking was nourished through his association with Van Den Enden and the larger radical Cartesian circle in Amsterdam. How can we verify the real possibility of a constitutive praises? Spinoza adversaries (both on the protest anti side and on the catholic side) maintain that the political problem in Spinoza is central and that it’s the substance of the religious problem. Naturally, they have a negative opinion of this inversion...

Words: 1365 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Era Of Good Feelings Dbq Research Paper

...one dominant political party, the Democratic-Republicans. Throughout this time period and the ensuing events that led to the formation of the two-party system, participation in political campaigns and elections drastically changed due to an overall increasing interest in politics from American citizens, as well as more politicians attempting to appeal to the “common man”. The percentage of eligible voter participation and the percent of states allowing voters to choose presidential electors rose dramatically...

Words: 1026 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Political Correctness Research Paper

...It has become important for the wider population to take care of what they say and in what situation they say it. This has been incorporated in the term now called Political Correctness or PC. In the last decade, this term has increasingly gotten popular in almost every institution of society. In this paper, the prevalence of political correctness in politics is analyzed. As politics plays a part in connecting all other function of society, it is important to take a view of how the lack of political correctness has changed the society in difference forms by causing an upsurge in hate crime and white supremacy. In this paper, the presidency of Obama and Trump is contrasted as two differing sides of PC and the harmful effects of Trump’s anti-PC campaign are showcased. Political Correctness in Politics The term Political correctness has been weaving in and out of political talks since quite a while but...

Words: 1564 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

John Lock

...In Chapter 1, Locke first reiterates his arguments from the First Treatise against Sir Robert Filmer's writings. His points refute Filmer as follows: Adam was NOT given absolute authority over the world and his children by God Adam's heirs, therefore, did not have this authority No one can claim rights since it is impossible to identify Adam's heirs today. Locke aimed to refute Filmer's theory of the divine right of sovereignty. Locke finishes the chapter by noting that one must not confuse different types of power--paternal, familial, and political--for each has very different characteristics. He defines political power as the right to make laws for the protection and regulation of property; these laws are backed by the community, for the public good. Locke addresses the natural instincts of people, or the state of nature, in order to define political power. In Chapter 2, Locke explains the state of nature as a state of equality in which no one has power over another, and all are free to do as they please. He notes, however, that this liberty does not equal license to abuse others, and that natural law exists even in the state of nature. Each individual in the state of nature has the power to execute natural laws, which are universal. Locke then posits that proof of this natural law lies in the fact that, even though a person cannot reasonably be under the power of a foreign king, if a person commits a crime in a foreign country they can still be punished. Locke...

Words: 664 - Pages: 3