Free Essay

Politics and Politicians

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By mgial
Words 1365
Pages 6
The great philosopher Aristotle stated the bare truth when he said centu­ries ago that man is "a political animal". He and his equally famous disciple Plato strongly denounced politics. Plato went so far as to say: "O, men of Ath­ens, if I was engaged in politics, I would have perished long ago and done no good either to you or to myself."

Since then, however, politics has pervaded every sphere of life, and the number of politicians has grown beyond measure. There is politics everywhere, in government generally, in the administration, in schools, colleges, universities, art, literature, and even in sports and games.

In fact, there is hardly any sphere of life and activity, male of female, which is free from politics and the insidious influences of the fast-growing tribe of politicians of various hues and types sincere ones (their number is indeed small), insin­cere ones and downright hypocrites (their tribe is fast growing), and others who fall mid-way and share the traits of both the good and the bad. Of course, it would be unfair to paint them all with the same brush.

The lament of Aristotle and Plato has become pointless in modern soci­ety, despite the advance of civilisation and the remarkable progress of educa­tion and general enlightenment.

Politics and politicians have not only grown amazingly, but have also prospered without let or hindrance. This may indeed be described as the age of politics; politicians are supreme everywhere.

The gates of politics are wide open; anyone (preferably people with some means and a mastery of rhetoric but there is no bar on others who can, and do, acquire wealth as the years pass) can join the vast society of politicians, learn their devious ways, especially their oratory, deceitful tactics and hypocrisy and thus become prosperous.

Politics and hypocrisy have become inalienable from lies, change of colour like the chameleon, and shift of loyalties to people who can pay them best. Consequently, politics has also become synonymous with endless graft and deep-rooted corruption.

Jawaharlal Nehru wrote in his famous book "Glimpses of World His­tory": "Politicians usually hide their real reasons and talk pompously of religion and justice and truth and the like. And still the great majority of people are taken in by the soft talk of politicians."

Again, in a letter to Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru wrote: "Ordinary politicians have no principles to stand by and their work is governed by day-to-day opportunism." He also knew that politicians cannot build India and held the view that in perfect society politicians would fade away.

A perfect society exists nowhere on earth, and it is no wonder that both politics and politicians continue to flourish, despite all their flaws and foibles.

While it is true that politicians manage to prosper, and many of them have become prosperous almost overnight through their tact, manoeuvres, deceit, and flattery of those in power and exploitation of those who are weak and helpless, it is also true that they have lost credibility.

No longer do the masses at any rate, the majority of them who have become politi­cally aware, thanks to the "education" by the politicians themselves take politicians at their word. Even in India, where a large number of people are illiterate, the people no longer believe in politicians' promises.

During the elections, a common comment by the average voter in the rural areas was that these politicians make tall, high-sounding promises but never fulfil them. They come to the people only at election time, and during the intervening period they are too busy feathering their own nests to bother about the plight of the people.

As for corruption and betrayal of public and even national interests by politicians, there seems to be no end. In this connection, one may recall the statement made by late Mrs. Gandhi in December, 1979, when she was out of power and virtually in the wilderness.

She disclosed that she had information from Dr. Henry Kissinger, the U.S. diplomat, to the effect that there was a C.I.A. (Central Intelligence Agency of the U.S.A.) agent in her Union Cabinet. In fact, it is no longer a secret that hardly any State is free from secret agents of foreign powers and, consequently, it is difficult to keep anything secret.

As for political morality and the standards of conduct among politi­cians, the less said the better. The loud professions and promises of politi­cians of all ranks are a mockery of the system they represent.

Each election brings out a long story of money changing hands, of loyalties being bought and sold like commodities in the open market, of betrayal of principles for personal gains, of going back on commitments almost by sunset the same day, and of crossing over and switching from one party to another, depending upon the weightage each commands and the prospects of power and privilege each holds.

Many politicians cry from the house-tops that they would fight authoritarianism throughout their life, and yet they have no hesitation in switch­ing support and selling their vote in the legislature to the highest bidder.

It is even true to say that, despite the progress of science and of the process of enlightenment, ours is not a critical age, nor the age of reason and rationality. Rather, it is the age of cheap politics, of partisanship, nepotism and selfishness of the highest degree. For most of the evils in the social system, the responsibility is that of the politicians.

When they lower the standards of conduct, their example proves infectious, and the fallout of dishonest practices is widespread and, of course, highly distressing.

It is futile to talk of principles and ideologies in such a dismal context. Ideologies are thrown to the winds at the slightest pressure or temptation.

In fact, the very words "ideology" and "principles" have become totally ir­relevant in politics and among politicians. Alterations and adjustments seem to become necessary whenever the needs of power politics dictate such adaptation.

Almost every issue has become political or is tainted with politics of some sort. In our schools, colleges and universities there is politics almost everywhere. Admissions, studies, appointments of lecturers, selection of examiners and paper-setters, manipulation of examination results are all dictated by political considerations.

Merit counts for little; expediency, which is just another name for subtle politics, governs most aspects of education. This is indeed a pity because there should be no politics at all in the sphere of education, especially in the temples of learning.

Politicians often take refuge behind the easy shelter of flexibility. There should be no rigidity, they argue. Ideals, they think, are not and must not be, absolute. The need for change is emphasised, not in the public interest but in their own.

Politicians readily quote the scriptures, and our religious books, the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, the Gita and even the Koran and the Bible, in defence of their actions. One may cheat, swindle, exploit, suppress, op­press, reach disgraceful compromises on basic principles, discard old friend­ships and form new ones to meet immediate needs. All this is permissible in politics and among politicians.

Politics is the art and science of government. Politicians, by and large, know little of it. They do nothing, but they appear to do every­thing—Jacks of all trades. Worse, they remain in public life endlessly and never seem to retire until they are called to heaven or hell, as the case may be. Their conscience never seems to prick them.

And it is not Indian poli­ticians alone who are notorious. In many other countries too they play a dubious role. Nikita Khrushchev, the well-known Russian Prime Minister and Communist Party leader, once said: "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river."

A European commentator was also right when he said: "To be a-chemist you must study chemistry, to be a lawyer or a physician you must study law or medicine, but to be a politician you need only to study your own interests."

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Politics Is Not Just a Man’s Game: the Inspirational Stories of 5 of India’s Female Politicians

...Politics is the science of running governmental affairs based on a ruling principle that shapes the identity of a nation. Politics in essence involves the art of forming, directing and administrating political units by a chosen set of ardent leaders who represent the interests of the majority of the people of the nation. The origin of politics dates back to early 2100 B.C with the monarchical rule practiced in the lands of Sumeria shaping the concept of legislation. But since the conception of the ideology of governance, the fairer sex has not had an equitable representation at the helm of decision making. In spite of being the largest democracy in the world, women’s representation is only 9.1 percent in the Indian parliament. In this male-dominated power game of politics, there are women leaders who have revolutionized the space of policymaking with their adroit and finesse. Listed below are the stories of five powerful female Indian politicians of all time who showed the world that women can be brilliant administrators. • Vijay Lakshmi Pandit, an Indian diplomat and politician, heralded as one of the world’s leading women in public life in the 20th century, was the daughter of noted aristocratic nationalist leader Motilal Nehru. She was an active worker in the Indian nationalist movement and was imprisoned by the British three times on accounts of her struggle to free India. In 1937, she was elected to the provincial legislature of the United Provinces and was......

Words: 866 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Politics in the Media

...American politics in different media An essay written by Emil Holte. As the headline articulates this essay would be about American politics in different medias. This essay will discuss the representation of American politics in three different medias. The media consists of books, TV-series and Cartoons. To be more specific it is, America – A Citizen’s Guide to Democracy Inaction (chapter 6), House of Cards and a cartoon with Obama and Romney. These three medias do all somehow have a common representation of American politics or American politicians. What do they have in common and where do they differentiate from each other? The common thing all three different medias are representing is the overall opinion of the American politician and American politics in general. The book, America – A Citizen’s Guide to Democracy Inaction (chapter 6), is deeper in the “theoretical” aspect than the other two. But you should not be fooled by the word theoretical. The book does describe the American politics and the politicians, but it is in a very informal and sarcastic approach. The sixth chapter describes campaigns and elections and therefore also how the American politician acts. It tells basic facts about American politics but with a twist of a subjective and sarcastically opinion. As an example “Initially, the process of conducting campaigns and holding elections was conceived as a means to an end – the peaceful transfer of power.”. Later on in the same passage “Today, running......

Words: 943 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Politics as a Vocation

...Politics as a Vocation: Essay 1 “Politics as a Vocation” is a speech that Max Weber gave to the Free Students Union of Munich University in January of 1919, almost immediately after the end of WW I. He opens his speech by saying he will not take a position on the actual problems of the day, but rather “I shall raise certain questions concerning the significance of political action in the whole way of life” (1, 27). Weber’s main goal throughout his speech is to address the broader philosophical questions of how a person might make politics his livelihood in the sense of a vocation, along with dissecting the idea of what exactly politics is in relation to power, and what characteristics people who are considered to be politicians posses in order to be considered successful politicians. Weber begins by expressing his desire to relay the idea that politics refers to “the leadership or the influence of leadership of a state” (1, 27). Politics in this sense proves itself to be a domineering force, but this begs the question what is a state? Weber promptly answers this question expressing: “a state is a human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory… The state is considered the sole source of the ‘right’ to use violence” (1, 27). By defining a state in these terms, Weber is not trying to limit the definition by allowing only this to define the institution, but rather force is the means specific to the......

Words: 1540 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Imperium

...restoring our faith in democracy. “ -Peter Ustinov In the book Imperium the characters are put in several situations in which they use their stance in politics to their advantage in their own personal agenda. Cicero plays the role well of the “everyman’s” politician. He learns very quickly in his career that he has to learn to play both sides of the vote and appeal to the rich as well as the commoners. In doing this he amasses more favors to his fellow politicians than he would ever really be able to repay. Caesar turns himself into the ultimate puppet master to achieve all that he wishes. He uses Pompey and Crassus to put all of his ideas into motion. The only person that seems to be unaffected by the corruption of politics is Cicero’s cousin Lucius. Lucius feared the corruption so much that he takes his own life. Cicero is first introduced to the reader as a lovable politician from humble beginnings who marries a rich woman in order to meet the money limit of Roman politics. He is a lawyer who surrounds himself with philosophers and people who rival his own intellect. Once Cicero announces his plan to be consul in the future, he sets out to achieve this no matter what it takes. After the death of his cousin, it seems as though Cicero loses his morality completely. Cicero easily gets swept up in making his way in Roman politics and all of the things that go along with it. He makes a few enemies when he decides to represent the people of Sicily against their current......

Words: 1533 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Social Media Politics

...Lecture 5 Reading Responses Vincent Raynauld Social Media and Politics Long ago in the history books of America and around the world politics occurred in open spaces and in crowded rooms. Grass roots organization actually occurred on grass. In the new millennium the political landscape is rapidly changing and people don’t know what to consider a fickle trend or an actual anthropological shift in the way in which politics operates today. What is becoming clear is that the Internet, or more specifically social media, is now a mean in which politicians can communicate with their electorate. At the same time it is a means in which electorates can engage with politicians. The political landscape is now scattered and fractured; and it is becoming difficult to discern what is politics and what is white noise. The article Party Change, Social Media, and the Rise of “Citizen-Initiated” Campaigning Rachel Gibson dissects the recent trends in the way that the internet and social media have changed the populist political landscape. What she focuses most on is Citizen Initiated Campaigning or CIC. This is grass roots campaigning that occurs in the digital sphere but eventually blends into actual organizations and voter turn outs for specific events and elections. Through her article Gibson examines how citizens engage with politicians they are passionate about and how they use social media to relay that politicians message to people they know through the internet.......

Words: 1023 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Social Media's Impact on Politics

...Social Media’s impact on Politics Social Media has had a lot of impacts in the government. It affects the governments in different ways such as:Globally, Politically, economically, and Involvement. As we know now a days the government likes to use social media to keep us informed or as youths like to say it to keep us Hip. The Government doesn’t just use social media to keep us Hip, but they also use it for campaigning. As said here “It has become fairly common for political campaigns to produce commercials and publish them for free on YouTube instead of, or in addition to, paying for time on television or the radio.”(Tom, Different ways of doing it). Politicians use social Media to do things like this in order to save money. Meaning when they are campaigning they also try to save money. “Personal communication via social media brings politicians and parties closer to their potential voters.”(European Parliamentary, Politicians).This shows how politicians are brought together with the people that could potentially vote for them. “Reactions, feedback, conversations and debates are generated online as well as support and participation for offline events.”(European Parliamentary, People). Due to social Media more and more youths are involved in politics, this means youths are no longer left in the dark they are knowledged. “41% of young people engaged in at least one act of participatory politics during the prior......

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Strayer Mgt 550 Final Exam

...strategy for minimizing office politics is to • increase the competition for jobs. • set a good example at the top. • keep tighter control of information. • reward people for snitching on office politicians. Question2 As the leader shares power with others, the leader's power • remains approximately the same. • increases. • multiplies in direct proportion to the number of people receiving a power share. • decreases. Strayer MGT 550 Final Exam To purchase this visit here: http://mindsblow.us/question_des/StrayerMGT550FinalExam/2794 Contact us at: help@mindblows.us Strayer MGT 550 Final Exam A recommended strategy for minimizing office politics is to • increase the competition for jobs. • set a good example at the top. • keep tighter control of information. • reward people for snitching on office politicians. Question2 As the leader shares power with others, the leader's power • remains approximately the same. • increases. • multiplies in direct proportion to the number of people receiving a power share. • decreases. Strayer MGT 550 Final Exam To purchase this visit here: http://mindsblow.us/question_des/StrayerMGT550FinalExam/2794 Contact us at: help@mindblows.us Strayer MGT 550 Final Exam A recommended strategy for minimizing office politics is to • increase the competition for jobs. • set a good example at the top. • keep tighter control of information. • reward people for snitching on office politicians. Question2 As the......

Words: 713 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

“Political Action: the Problem of Dirty Hands”

...“Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands” POLI 2200-001 Dr. Darin Nesbitt Ida Zaeri (300175666) September 24th, 2014 Words: 1189 Michael Walzer took it upon himself to explain the problems within politics, a problem that is often neglected by society and the public until it is too late. The thesis of this article is quite clear and it something that he believes is important for all political scientists to read and consider thoroughly. The topic of this article is set forth through several questions: can politicians achieve good without getting their hands dirty? Is it necessary to get your hands dirty for the greater good? If a good man gets his hands dirty is he still a good man? What should the consequences of getting your hands dirty be? The thesis is clearly stated as: “whether or not a man can ever face, or ever has to face, a moral dilemma, a situation where he must choose between two courses of action both of which it would be wrong for him to undertake” (160). Walzer puts forth a compelling argument that this “dirty hands” dilemma is a common dilemma in present day politics. This problem is considered to be an issue mostly for democracies since these are the governments claiming that we are all free and equal and our leaders represent the citizens’ choice and opinions that are moral and ethical. In Communist governments and other types of suppressive governments the public has no say in the decisions of the governments and “Hoerderer in Satre’s play......

Words: 1205 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Pakikisama "Debt of Gratitude in Philippine Settings and Politics"

...system of pakikisama and pakikipagkapwa-tao. Pakikisama is the opposite of individualism. In Filipino culture, a person who has no pakikisama is a loner, an individualist disdained by others who seek his company. He does not know how to “go with the crowd.” A related word is makibagay, “to conform” with the group in order to maintain a Smooth Interpersonal Relationship. Pakikisama is also sharing one’s wealth, talent, time and self with fellow human beings as in bayanihan, working together for a common good (with or without regard for monetary remunerationor favor in return for the acts). Politics and culture in my opinion should not be and cannot be separated because it is quite obvious that there is culture in politics and there is politics in culture.Both indespensable from each other , the other would fail to exist or sustain the existence if one is missing. A Politician as waht we call them (previously statesmen) will positively grant the requests and demands of his family, partymates, and friends or non friends for that matter just to ensur the security of support formt hem comes election period....

Words: 843 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

What Is Politics?

...What is Politics? 1. Introduction When questioned, “What is politics?” what kinds of image do people have? Nowadays politics is an essential factor for our everyday life. Almost in every country there is governance to control the country, and politics to support the organization. According to Merriam Webster’s definition of “Politics”, politics is an activity that supports people’s lifestyle by creating rules to control governance with maintenance, repair and destruction. However, people would normally think that politics is about the government holding beliefs to aim for an organization to benefit for themselves and have small interest to the citizens. In fact this view of politics cannot be denied when looking at such examples from the past and now. 2. Politics in the Past 2.1 The Root of Politics When did politics start? This question cannot be answered, as there are no specific dates of when it had started. If there were an answer to this question, probably the start of mankind would have been the beginning of politics, since the nature of politics is very similar to that of rule and control. Countries that had monarchs, for instance a country that was ruled by kings and emperors were classified as divine; a more like authoritarian government style. Until the French revolution, this divine was the absolute and most common way of ruling a country. These monarchs can be dated as early as 2100 BC in Sumeria, which is said to be one of the longest and......

Words: 950 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Where Does the "Need to Know" End?

...The value we place onto a politician's private life has a direct relationship towards the way he governs his office. As a society, we're so not in touch with politics that the only time we know of a politician's way about, is when he has been caught "having fun." Our politician's private life is more important to some of us than the constitution that governs our lives. For some reason, we seem to pay more attention to the media when the issue that is being discussed involves a politician being caught having an affair than when it involves politics. We are imperfect beings having a loving experience; the result of our relationship will depends on how we balance our imperfection with our values. What we do in our private lives are our business. Yes, I understand why some people maybe concern with politicians' private lives. To some degree, they do have a responsibility to comport themselves in a manner that shows leadership. After all, kids are forever using them as examples, their social image to some extent characterize the society they represent. However, it's as equally unjustified for the media to project on the TV screen a politician's private life. If Malia fell while climbing up the presidential helicopter, I don't wish to know about this. If the 7 years old Sasha had a confrontation in school with her peer, the media shouldn't inform us about it. Those are private issues that should be dealt privately. If we the American people are the first to know about a private...

Words: 892 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Women in Media

...Media Representations of Canadian Women in Politics. Introduction The mass media have largely helped female political participation and electoral success. Media notice of the ‘gender gap’ helped women in the political arena, decades ago, and instilled awareness of the women’s vote and needed female representation (Kahn & Goldenberg, 1991, p. 104). Women are still presented in ways that differ from males in political coverage or other media, apt to be discussed for personal attributes, appearance or private lives, described as perky individuals, and often as soldiers or otherwise masculine persons, and as special achievers. It seems that Canadian female politicians cannot be simple representatives. Lively, Perky, Individuals Cody Groat (2013) discussed Sheila Copps, a longstanding Hamilton East MP and deputy prime minister to Jean Chretien that through twenty years in office continued to be presented in the media as cute and singular. Donatella Campus (2013) explained that women politicians find a ‘double bind’ in the need to be presentable, as means feminine in expected ways and competent (p.39). Canadian politics at all levels require media success according to established patterns. Much is applauded of how women balance family obligations and careers or for that matter, how they spend their free time. Male politicians when interviewed are not apt to be asked about family strain, stress or how they cope with......

Words: 606 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Politics Without Religion

...they are not absolute truths either. Because absolute truth is what people tend to seek, they cling to a perfect god or a divine book, and that’s fine. It’s their right as Americans. However, when religion seeps into politics, therein lays the problem. Politics is loosely defined as “the activities associated with the governance of an area or country” or as “the art or science concerned with guiding or influencing government policy”, which ties neither God nor religion to the world of politics, even including the word science in the definition, a word that tends to be a threat to the deeply religious. Because of its tendency toward biasness, prejudice, and insensitivity, the world of politics need not affiliate with the cancer of society and decency that is organized religion. Names like Jerry Falwell, Jesse Jackson, Mike Huckabee, and Pat Robertson do not often come up in the same sentence, but they all share two things in common. They were influential to politics, and they are all deeply religious. It is no surprise then that they all hold true to the ideals presented within their churches and their bibles and use those ideals to further political agendas to create new policy or affect existing policy. Politics should be spoken for by politicians. That is not to say that, as Americans, we should not wish to...

Words: 1655 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Ad Hominem Attacks on Politics

...October 11, 2015 Ad hominem attacks on Politics Over the years, ad hominem has been very prevalent among politicians. It is a logical fallacy that occurs when one attacks the person making an argument rather than the argument itself. The use of Ad Hominem is something that practically rules the political scene. Politicians thrive off of it when the population believes the fallacy. An ugly picture is painted of the opponent causing voters to doubt the quality of the opponent's arguments. I, personally, think that when it comes to politics “anything should not go”. Personal attacks should not be allowed. It takes attention away from the many issues that are facing a country. Citizens need to understand that attacks on the personal lives of our public leaders are petty and counterproductive. No work is getting done, since we are busy attacking each other. Because politician have right to separate their private life from political life.And its private life is not the right way to judge the politician because if politicians behavior is good with his wife but we donot know it Some may say that we need to see what type of person the politician is and we need to know about them however why should their private lives affect their jobs? What goes on in their lives doesn't change how capable or incapable one is with their job. They are still human whether they are politicians or not. They still have rights. One's job or position should not preclude them from having a private......

Words: 553 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

New Media & Politics

...New Media and Politics New media is allowing for innovative, effective, inexpensive, and faster ways to spread politics. The old days of only being able to watch political debates or campaigns on the television or on the radio are gone. New media has lead to more freedom of choice, vast sharing capabilities, instant responses from the public, and better ways to fundraise. No matter how many new forms of media come out nothing will ever replace the television or radio. New media is not substituting the old way of politicking, but rather enhancing it. The Internet, along with YouTube and such things as DVR and TiVo, gives viewers more of a choice of what they want to watch. They no longer have to watch what is limited to them through television. Knowing this, politicians can figure out more effective ways to campaign or broadcast messages that are more appealing to the public so that the public will be well informed of it and want to view it. Technology is so advanced that most of these developments in new media such as the Internet and YouTube are accessible from one’s cellular phone. That ease of accessibility gives politicians incentive to communicate information to the public in ways they can view from their cellular phones in addition to older more common ways of corresponding with the public. In doing this politicians are making sure people have the choice of viewing the information in the form most favorable to them. News travels fast and with such websites as......

Words: 537 - Pages: 3