Free Essay

Procedures for Participation of Students with Disabilities in Virginia’s Accountability System

In:

Submitted By jashburn
Words 1573
Pages 7
Procedures for Participation of Students with Disabilities in Virginia’s Accountability System

A Guide for Educators and Parents

Virginia Department of Education Updated April 2010

Table of Contents I II
Definition of Students with Disabilities ………………………………………….. Description of Assessment Program
A. Standards of Learning (SOL) Program ………………………………………..
B. Virginia Grade Level Alternative (VGLA) ……………………………………
C. Virginia Substitute Evaluation Program (VSEP) ……………………………..
D. Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP) …………………………….
APPENDIX………………………………………………………………………..

Virginia Department of Education Procedures for Participation of Students with Disabilities in Virginia’s Accountability System
This document provides information about the participation of students with disabilities in the assessment component of Virginia’s Accountability System. Students with disabilities may participate through the Standards of Learning (SOL) assessments, the Virginia Grade Level Alternative (VGLA), the Virginia Substitute Evaluation Program (VSEP), or the Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP). Included in this document are guidelines for determining how students with disabilities participate in the Virginia Assessment Program, procedures for providing testing accommodations, and documentation requirements.

I.

Definition of Students with Disabilities

Students with disabilities in the Commonwealth of Virginia include identified students under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 [IDEA ‘04] P. L. 108446 and under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (1973), as amended.

II.

Description of Assessment Programs

A. Standards of Learning (SOL) Program The SOL in the areas of English, mathematics, science, history/social science are intended to set reasonable targets and expectations for what teachers are expected to teach and students are expected to learn. The purposes of the SOL assessments at grades 3 through 8 and high school are to inform parents and teachers about what students are learning in relation to the SOL and to hold schools accountable for teaching the SOL content. B. Virginia Grade Level Alternative (VGLA) The purpose of the VGLA is to provide students with disabilities the opportunity to participate in state assessments when their disabilities, even with accommodations, prevent them from accessing the SOL content area assessments due to the multiple choice format. The VGLA is available for students in grades 3 through 8 as a grade level alternative assessment for SOL testing. Students with an identified disability eligible under IDEA 2004 or Section 504 who meet the VGLA guidelines for participation may be assessed through the VGLA. Students who are eligible to participate in the VGLA will be required to demonstrate individual achievement of grade level content as presented in the SOL test blueprints. Students will compile a collection of work samples, called a Collection of Evidence (COE), to demonstrate performance on all on-grade level SOL. Decisions about participation in VGLA are made on a test-by-test and individual basis.

C. Virginia Substitute Evaluation Program (VSEP) The purpose of the VSEP is to provide students whose disabilities prevent them from accessing the SOL test(s) in a content area, even with accommodations, with the opportunity to participate in state assessments. The VSEP is available for students as a grade level alternative assessment for SOL end-of-course tests and/or certification for literacy and/or numeracy for the Modified Standard Diploma. Students who are eligible to participate in the VSEP will be required to demonstrate individual achievement in course content standards as presented in the SOL test blueprints for the academic content areas in which they are being assessed. Only students with an identified disability eligible under IDEA or Section 504, who meet the VSEP guidelines for participation may be assessed through the VSEP. Students will compile a collection of work samples, called a Course Work Compilation (CWC), to demonstrate performance all SOLs in which they have received instruction. Decisions about participation in VSEP are made on a test-by-test and individual basis. D. Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP) The purpose of the VAAP is to evaluate the performance of students with significant cognitive disabilities. The VAAP is available to students in grades 3 through 8 and grade 11 who are working on academic standards that have been reduced in complexity and depth. Only students with significant cognitive disabilities who are eligible under IDEA 2004 and who meet the VAAP guidelines for participation may be assessed through the VAAP. Students will compile a collection of work samples, called a Collection of Evidence (COE) to demonstrate achievement on the Aligned Standards of Learning (ASOL).Students who participate in the VAAP participate in all content areas; participation decisions are made on an individual basis.

III.

Who Should Be Tested

It is the intent of the Commonwealth of Virginia to include all students with disabilities in the assessment component of Virginia’s accountability system. The federal regulations under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and state regulations under the Virginians with Disabilities Act, Section 51.5-40 et seq. of the Code of Virginia, require that individuals with disabilities be given equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from the policies and procedures customarily granted to all individuals. IDEA 2004 regulations require that all students with disabilities participate in the state’s accountability system. More specifically, students with disabilities are expected to participate in all content area assessments that are available to students without disabilities.

IV.

Determination of How Students with Disabilities Participate in Virginia’s Accountability System

All students with disabilities in grades 3 through 8 and high school will participate in Virginia’s Accountability System. Students with disabilities will participate in the SOL assessments either with or without accommodations or in VGLA, VSEP, or VAAP. For all students with disabilities identified under IDEA 2004, the IEP Team determines how the 4

student will participate in the accountability system. For students identified under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the 504 Committee determines how the student will participate. Generally decisions about how a student with a disability will be tested should be made independently for each content area. When determining participation in Virginia’s Accountability System, all students with disabilities first must be considered for participation in the SOL assessments. A student’s IEP or 504 Plan must specify the student’s participation in the state accountability system as follows: • • • • participation in the SOL test with no accommodations;1 participation in the SOL test with accommodations; participation in the VGLA or VSEP; participation in VAAP;

If the IEP Team determines that the student must participate in the VGLA, VSEP or VAAP instead of the SOL test a statement that addresses the following must be included in the IEP. • • • Why the student cannot participate in the regular assessment; Why the particular assessment selected is appropriate for the student, including that the child meets the criteria for the alternate assessment; and How the child’s participation in VGLA, VSEP, or VAAP will impact the child’s promotion, graduation with a modified standard, standard, or advanced studies diploma; or other matters.

V.

Role of the Individualized Education Program (IEP) Team
(For students identified under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act)

For all students with disabilities identified under IDEA 2004, the IEP is the plan to ensure that they receive an appropriate education. The IEP process also ensures that each student's parent(s)2 or surrogate parent(s) is an active participant of the IEP Team. The IEP Team makes decisions about participation in each of the assessments and the need for and selection of accommodations. These decisions should be made during the IEP Team meeting that precedes the assessment administration. If the decisions about participation in Virginia’s accountability system are not reflected on the current IEP, an IEP meeting must be held to address and document these issues on the IEP prior to the test administration. The ramifications of these decisions made by the IEP Team must be clearly explained to and understood by the student’s parent(s) and the student, if appropriate. Additionally, the
The Board of Education has approved a number of substitute tests that students may take to earn verified credits towards graduation. The Board has also approved a schedule of career and technical examinations for licensure or certification that may be substituted for SOL tests to earn student-selected verified credits. See the Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia for the definition of parent for a child with a disability. The parental rights transfer to the student when he/she reaches the age of majority (18 in Virginia) unless certain procedures specified in regulations have been followed.

parent(s) and student should be provided with an explanation of their procedural safeguards and due process rights.

VI. Role of the 504 Committee
(For students identified under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 19-3, as amended and do not have an IEP) Each school division is required to determine appropriate educational programs for all students with disabilities who qualify under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, by convening a knowledgeable group to evaluate and determine program needs. Therefore, decisions about the participation in each of the assessments, the need for, and selection of accommodations are the responsibility of a 504 Committee. Each student's parent, legal guardian or surrogate parent must be a participant in these decisions. These decisions should be made during the 504 Committee meeting which precedes the assessment administration. If the decisions were not made at this time, an additional 504 Committee meeting must be held to address these issues prior to the test administration. The ramifications of the decision must be clearly explained to and understood by the student’s parent, legal guardian, or surrogate parent and the student, if appropriate.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Accounting Information System

...Swan’s Supplies is a wholesaler of sporting goods equipment for retailers in a local metropolitan area. The company buys sporting goods equipment direct from manufacturers and then resells them to individual retail stores in the regional area. The raw data in Figure illustrate some of the information required for the company’s purchase order system. As you can see, this information is characteristic of accounting purchase order systems but is not well organized. In fact, because of the repeating groups in the right-most columns, it cannot even be stored in a computer system. [pic] .:. Requirements Store this data in a spreadsheet to make it easy to manipulate. Then perform each of the following tasks in turn: 1. Reorganize the data in first normal form and print your spreadsheet. Why is your data in first normal form? 2. Reorganize the data from part 1 into second normal form and print your spreadsheet. Why is your data in second normal form? 3. Reorganize the data from part 2 into third normal form and print your spreadsheet. Why is your data in third normal form? SOLUTION: The raw data is as follows: | | | | |Purchase | | | | | | | |Customer | |Phone | |...

Words: 396 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

At Risk Asped

...OF GRADUATE STUDIES New Era, Quezon City COMMON PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED BY STUDENTS “AT RISK” IN A REGULAR CLASS AS PERCEIVED BY GRADE 8 REGULAR AND SPED TEACHERS IN BATASAN HILLS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL BY Cupido, Luigi T. DR. ESTRELLA N. SAN ANDRES FEBRUARY 22, 2014 Chapter 1 The Problem and It’s Background Special Education is a privilege and a basic human right for any individual students. It is granted for those who are diagnosed with developmental disadvantages and students with special needs. This type of education is progressing so as the discovery of different types of exceptionalities and its spectrums. The wise variety of its type and spectrums helps educators identify the corresponding needs of special education learners. Children with special needs are now being placed in a self-contained class for most public or private schools. Though, there were some students who are disadvantaged or even behind the slow performing ones who are not yet recognized. These types are often labelled by diagnosticians as students “At Risk.” From the term itself, it indicates potential exceptionalities that may possibly arise. The main difficulty that could possibly be anticipated among the so called “At Risk” students is the misleading concepts towards them. Most teachers would take them as regular students and some may call them “slow learners,” “out of school” or even “worse performing pupils...

Words: 6777 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Online Learning

...Understanding the Implications of Online Learning for Educational Productivity U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology Prepared by: Marianne Bakia Linda Shear Yukie Toyama Austin Lasseter Center for Technology in Learning SRI International January 2012 This report was prepared for the U.S. Department of Education under Contract number ED01-CO-0040 Task 0010 with SRI International. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education is intended or should be inferred. U.S. Department of Education Arne Duncan Secretary Office of Educational Technology Karen Cator Director January 2012 This report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce this report in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the suggested citation is: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, Understanding the Implications of Online Learning for Educational Productivity, Washington, D.C., 2012. This report is available on the Department’s Web site at http://www.ed.gov/technology On request, this publication is available in alternate formats, such as Braille, large print, or computer diskette. For more information, please contact the Department’s Alternate Format Center at (202) 260-0852 or (202) 260-0818. Technical Contact: Bernadette Adams Senior Policy Analyst Office...

Words: 22355 - Pages: 90

Premium Essay

To Err Is Human

...http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9728.html We ship printed books within 1 business day; personal PDFs are available immediately. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System Linda T. Kohn, Janet M. Corrigan, and Molla S. Donaldson, Editors; Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine ISBN: 0-309-51563-7, 312 pages, 6 x 9, (2000) This PDF is available from the National Academies Press at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9728.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books in PDF • Read thousands of books online for free • Explore our innovative research tools – try the “Research Dashboard” now! • Sign up to be notified when new books are published • Purchase printed books and selected PDF files Thank you for downloading this PDF. If you have comments, questions or just want more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may contact our customer service department tollfree at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or send an email to feedback@nap.edu. This book plus thousands more are available at http://www.nap.edu. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF File are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Distribution, posting, or copying...

Words: 104719 - Pages: 419

Free Essay

Living History

... brothers, pets, house, hobbies, school, sports and plans for the future. Forty-two years later, I began writing another memoir, this one about the eight years I spent in the White House living history with Bill Clinton. I quickly realized that I couldn’t explain my life as First Lady without going back to the beginning―how I became the woman I was that first day I walked into the White House on January 20, 1993, to take on a new role and experiences that would test and transform me in unexpected ways. By the time I crossed the threshold of the White House, I had been shaped by my family upbringing, education, religious faith and all that I had learned before―as the daughter of a staunch conservative father and a more liberal mother, a student activist, an advocate for children, a lawyer, Bill’s wife and Chelsea’s mom. For each chapter, there were more ideas I wanted to discuss than space allowed; more people to include than could be named; more places visited than could be described. If I mentioned everybody who has impressed, inspired, taught, influenced and helped me along the way, this book would be several volumes long. Although I’ve had to be selec- tive, I hope that I’ve conveyed the push and pull of events and relationships that affected me and continue to shape and enrich my world today. Since leaving the White House I have embarked on a new phase of my life...

Words: 217937 - Pages: 872

Premium Essay

Julius Ceasar

...OUTLINE OF U.S. HISTORY OUTLINE OF OUTLINE OF U.S. HISTORY C O N T E N T S CHAPTER 1 Early America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 CHAPTER 2 The Colonial Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 CHAPTER 3 The Road to Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 CHAPTER 4 The Formation of a National Government . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 CHAPTER 5 Westward Expansion and Regional Differences . . . . . . . 110 CHAPTER 6 Sectional Conflict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 CHAPTER 7 The Civil War and Reconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 CHAPTER 8 Growth and Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 CHAPTER 9 Discontent and Reform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 CHAPTER 10 War, Prosperity, and Depression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 CHAPTER 11 The New Deal and World War I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 CHAPTER 12 Postwar America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 CHAPTER 13 Decades of Change: 1960-1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274 CHAPTER 14 The New Conservatism and a New World Order . . . . . . 304 CHAPTER 15 Bridge to the 21st Century . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320 PICTURE PROFILES Becoming a Nation . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

Words: 104976 - Pages: 420

Premium Essay

California an Interpretive History - Rawls, James

...CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA An Interpretive History TENTH EDITION James J. Rawls Instructor of History Diablo Valley College Walton Bean Late Professor of History University of California, Berkeley TM TM CALIFORNIA: AN INTERPRETIVE HISTORY, TENTH EDITION Published by McGraw-Hill, a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Previous editions © 2008, 2003, and 1998. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning. Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the United States. This book is printed on acid-free paper. 1234567890 QFR/QFR 10987654321 ISBN: 978-0-07-340696-1 MHID: 0-07-340696-1 Vice President & Editor-in-Chief: Michael Ryan Vice President EDP/Central Publishing Services: Kimberly Meriwether David Publisher: Christopher Freitag Sponsoring Editor: Matthew Busbridge Executive Marketing Manager: Pamela S. Cooper Editorial Coordinator: Nikki Weissman Project Manager: Erin Melloy Design Coordinator: Margarite Reynolds Cover Designer: Carole Lawson Cover Image: Albert Bierstadt, American (born...

Words: 248535 - Pages: 995