...The United States Constitution overcame the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and provided organization for the new government. In the 1780’s, the United States composed their first form of government after the colonists won the Revolutionary War against the British. This first form of government was known as The Articles of Confederation, which gave power to the states and created a unicameral legislature. A new constitution was made at the constitutional convention, which formulated many different compromises such as The Great Compromise, and the Three-Fifths compromise. Some people believed that the Constitution should be ratified, and some people thought it should not be, these people became known as federalists and antifederalists. While the articles of confederation created the first form of government for the states, it had many flaws. Some of these were resolved at the Constitutional Convention by creating many compromises, but people known as anti-federalists still thought that the constitution should not be ratified. This was solved by...
Words: 879 - Pages: 4
...significant repair to the United States healthcare since Medicare and Medicaid passed in 1965. In this paper, the key points that will be discussed are obamacare policy, it pros and cons, if it raises any issues with federalism and the policys effectiveness. Obamacare is aimed at helping the underinsured to gain insurance. With this plan everyone would have health insurance regardless of income, or anything that would stop the person from attaining health insurance. The Affordable Care Act is a watershed in U.S. public health policy. Through a series of extensions of, and revisions to, the multiple laws that together comprise the federal legal framework for the U.S. health-care system, the Act established the basic legal protections that until now have been absent: a near-universal guarantee of access to affordable health insurance coverage, from birth through retirement.(Rosenbaum, 2010) Obamacare is a name used by critics of President Obamas efforts to reform health care. Its a common term used to describe the Patient Protection and Affordable care Act of 2010. ObamaCare contains many benefits, especially for low and middle income families and businesses. ObamaCare also contains some obstacles for larger firm that dont insure their employees and certain aspects of the healthcare industry. The Pros and Cons boil down to this, Obamacare the average American has a lot to gain and little to lose, while some larger firms and consequently their employees may notice negative...
Words: 871 - Pages: 4
...Several people have a big issue with this because some regulations of the law give a large amount of control to the federal government. People argue that this involvement from the government makes the law unconstitutional. The biggest question being is if the pros outweigh the cons and if the plan will benefit the people of this nation There have always been issues in this country with healthcare being extremely expensive. This being the case, many people have been forced to go uninsured and put their own health at risk simply because they could not afford to make it a priority. Not only does this cause them to go without preventative care, but when the time comes in an emergency and medical attention is needed the average American cannot afford to pay the out of pocket medical bill and ends up filing bankruptcy on the medical bill resulting in the hospital losing a ridiculous amount of money. President Obama along with many Americans agreed that something has to be done to change this travesty. There are many pros and cons to the Affordable Care Act that needs to be evaluated in order to decide if this law is good or bad for our country. The following are some main points that we all need to think about: Pros: • Affordable benefits • Children’s CHIP program expands to 9 million participants • Small business tax credits • Children remain on parents insurance until the age of 26 • Improved Medicare plan •...
Words: 937 - Pages: 4
...States. The Patient Protection and the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. Together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, it represents the most significant regulatory overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system since the passage of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965 (Wikipedia 2012). The main focus of Obamacare is to leave no person without health coverage. The majority of US Citizens struggle or can simply not afford health care thus not having proper treatment for illness for themselves or their children. The Obamacare policy is a reform of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that was passed by Senate in December, 2009. Shortly after in 2010, the house abandoned this reform bill and amended it into the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. Obamacare has many pros and cons and is so controversial that it makes headlines constantly. The pros to Obamacare I could go on about but I will hit a few. The major one is this unbelievable and rather sad...
Words: 784 - Pages: 4
...In an effort to generate a solution to the shortage of health care, President Barrack Obama proposed the universal health care program named the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act, also known as Obamacare. It has been the most major adjustment to the United States healthcare since Medicare and Medicaid was passed in 1965. Obamacare was signed into the law in March, 2010. In this paper, the key points that will be discussed are Obamacare policy, its pros and cons, and if it happens to raise any complications with federalism and the policy’s efficiency. Obamacare is intended on helping the people that do not have insurance to gain insurance. With the said plan everyone should be able to have health insurance no matter what their...
Words: 769 - Pages: 4
...The biggest pro I believe is that it gives us freedom to express ourselves and stand up for what we believe in. It allows us to to practice whatever religion we want to practice, and we do not have to be worried or afraid of getting punished for taking part in a religion of our choice. People can peacefully protest issues that they feel are important and have meaning to them, and who would get to decide which groups were hate groups and which groups were not. All in all I believe it should not change. These reasons are what makes America,...
Words: 419 - Pages: 2
...By allowing the government to regulate and attempting to remove freedoms of this great nation that were intended for us by our founding fathers, we leave ourselves vulnerable to attack. This is not an attack that comes from the outside, some foreign nation on a warpath for the destruction of the United States. This is an implosion. Government versus citizens, citizens versus citizens. I do not believe this Is a time to have our rights stripped from us. I believe once you allow yourself to be denied the rights that were guaranteed to us, you only set yourself up to have more stolen. The second amendment reads, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed(U.S. Constitution, Amendment 2)". With that being said A militia is defined as ordinary citizens that are not soldiers, however, make up an army(The gale group, 2008). I believe the intended purpose of this Amendment was to allow Americans the right to keep firearms not only for the purpose of hunting or sport but to defend themselves any time need...
Words: 689 - Pages: 3
...without and fees or co-pays. Next, a brief history of the policy will be discussed (Obamacare, n/a.dd). A system of federalism is lacking in the Obamacare Policy. Federalism was created to balance the power between federal and state governments. Obamacare is lacking the governance of state and local entities, leaving the federal government as the sole power. The federal government is forcing an individual mandate to every individual to purchase health insurance, but legally is it the states that have the authority to make the final decisions on governmental programs. There is tension that if the states buck the federal government of the issue, they may lose federal funding for Medicaid. There are pros and cons to the new policy (Obamacare, 2010). There are several pros to Obamacare. It was created to reduce the overall health care deficit by having every individual care health insurance. This would promote health and be a preventive to the emergency room. Those who can afford insurance will be added to Medicaid or given a tax break to purchase insurance. Children can stay on their parent’s plans up to age twenty six and children with pre-existing conditions will not be denied coverage. Families and individuals with current medical coverage can continue utilizing their current plans. Finally, there is an estimate of hundred and forty three million...
Words: 417 - Pages: 2
...Analysis of Obamacare Health Policy Anthony E Davis POL201: American National Government Ginger Devine November 25, 2013 Analysis of Obamacare Health Policy One of the most crucial issues of today is the issue of health insurance and availability of quality health services to all residents of the U.S. This paper will analyze the Obamacare Healthcare Policy-highlighting its core elements, health care problem solution, and the policies history. Also it will evaluate the pros and cons using different perspectives in debate. Let’s begin with the elements of Obamacare. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), also called Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act, is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010 (ObamaCare Summary: A Summary of Obama's Health Care Reform, 2013). Since the establishment of Medicaid and Medicare of 1965, Obamacare is one of the most significant expansions from the government and administrative overhaul of the U.S healthcare system. The purpose of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is to raise the rate of health coverage of Americans, to modernize the delivery of health care services, and to reduce the overall costs of health care. This is to be done by restricting certain insurance company practices and providing tax credits and subsidies for individuals and businesses. Prior to the approval of the Obamacare Policy, the American health care industry was in deep...
Words: 1743 - Pages: 7
...NOVEMBER 23 , 2011 | [pic] |ATTORNEY JOHN WASHINGTON | |BUL 5323 – BUSINESS LAW | Introduction Ever since its declaration in 1993 under President Bill Clinton’s administration, don’t ask, don’t tell (DADT) has been a major dispute amongst the United States citizens; especially those involved in the U.S. Military. Questions such as: “Is it even constitutional?” and “What are the pros and cons?” and “Should the policy be repealed?” have been propound. Subsequent to all of the questioning, viewed opinions and assessments, this subject generally falls into three perspectives: the permissive, the restrictive and the prohibitive. This paper...
Words: 4171 - Pages: 17
...Same Sex Marriage Recently the discussion of same sex marriage has been a hot topic in both the political and religious arenas. This controversial issue has caused many citizens to take a solid stance on same sex marriages based on his or her morals, beliefs, and viewpoints. Popular reasons that citizens considered when deciding their stance are civil rights, religion, parenting, and financial matters. This paper will break down the pros and cons of each of the reasons listed and attempt to come to a conclusion of should same sex marriages be legalized in the state of Californians. Civil Rights The Constitution of the United States was written in 1776, which during that time there were no gender specifications noted pertaining to the recognition of a legal marriage. Same sex marriage debate is so large that in 1996, President Bill Clinton signed for the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which clarified that marriage is between a man and woman. The main reason gay and lesbian couples are fighting hard to legalize same sex marriage is so those couples will be allowed to and benefit from the same government, financial, and legal stances as heterosexuals marriages. Several states allow partnerships or civil union for same sex couples, however, they are denied certain rights given to heterosexual couples (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2013). Because of the growing debate of same sex marriages, President Obama administration said that it would no longer defend...
Words: 2509 - Pages: 11
...Corporate Governance & Business Ethics Gun Control vs. Gun Violence The debate over gun control in the United States has been a topic of controversy over the years. In particular, the killing of twenty schoolchildren in Newtown, Connecticut. In December 2012 this mass shooting fueled a national discussion over gun laws. However, compromise legislation would have banned semiautomatic assault weapons and expanded background checks was defeated in the senate in 2013, despite extensive public support. Arguments for more restrictive gun laws http://gun.laws.com/gun-rights/gun-control-versus-gun-rights As society continues to diversify and human beings become more individualistic, we drift further apart from understanding each other. The gun control debate is not directly effected by this, but psychologically human beings fear what we don't understand. In a society with hundreds of cultures, differences and arguments can arise out of nothing. Words are one thing but the use of firearms is an entirely different topic. With less restrictive laws on purchasing and ownership a seemingly pointless feud could intensify into murder. Guns give a man power, with power inevitably comes abuse. There is a high rate of gun-related violence http://gun.laws.com/gun-rights/gun-control-versus-gun-rights The United States leads the world in gun violence and ownership. There is a direct correlation. This is perhaps the most obvious argument made in the gun control debate-guns...
Words: 2274 - Pages: 10
...Adopting Arizona’s Immigration Law in All states Does politics have the upper hand on humanity in Arizona's immigration law SB-1070. This law should be abolished because it is racist, unfair and degrading to legal and illegal Latino immigrants? Immigration has always presented a problem for America and we now find ourselves faced with the issue on a large political scale. On July 29, 2010, the United States of America listened in as Arizona State put into effect their own immigration law. With the backing of Michigan, Alabama, Florida, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina Arizona has set the presence for illegal immigrants to face the law. The new law “directs officers to question people about their immigration status during the enforcement of other laws such as traffic stops, and if there's a reasonable suspicion they're in the U.S. illegally they will be deported”. “Arizona’s illegal alien population is 460,000 and according to a 2008 study by the Federation for American Immigration Reform, Georgia illegal alien population is 490,000”. (Inger Eberhart, 2010). As Americans we need to support Arizona’s efforts to clean house in fight of illegal aliens in the U.S. Most critics are saying that this is the strictest measure in generations for the detaining of illegal immigrants. The key work is “ILLEGAL”. Every American knows that if it is illegal then you should not be doing it, adolescent 101, but we live in a time where people feel that illegal aliens...
Words: 1320 - Pages: 6
...In the Constitution, “describing the electoral college is longer and descends to more detail than any other single issue”(Guelzo). Guelzo reminds us that the founding fathers cared so deeply for this one subject and went so in depth describing it solely to protect us from “tyranny of the majority”(“Pros and Cons”). When the founding fathers chose the use of electors over the popular vote it was only to protect all citizens, especially the ones living in unpopulated areas(“Pros and Cons”). Alexander Hamilton insisted that the electoral college is if “not perfect, it is at least excellent” because “ the office of president will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications”(“Pros and Cons”). Another reason to support the electoral college is that it has only failed five times; this was when a president who received the most electoral votes did not receive the most popular votes but still became president. The founding fathers did not lack the technology resources when they made the electoral college and it it is the very thing holding our sometimes volatile...
Words: 1326 - Pages: 6
...terms: Both Ends Deadfreight Demurrage Free in and out Laydays Seaworthy Trim Supercargo Project Cargo * Definition of the term * Understanding of the pre-qualification notice * Understanding of an RFP * Technical proposal / Financial proposal * Describe a survey company * List and describe 3 principle activities of the survey company * List elements of value that survey companies provide to the seller / buyer / financial institution Transportation Law and Legal Liability * Definition of Common Law / Statutes * Constitution Act, 1867 * Constitution Act, 1982 * Definition of ‘Patriation’ * The Canadian Constitution: Federal and Provincial Jurisdictions * The Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Definition of a Right / Definition of a Freedom * The Court System – the different courts * Jurisdiction of Federal Court of Canada pertinent to us: aeronautics and transportation; oceans and fisheries * Definition of international convention / binding in law * Hague Rules / Hamburg Rules /...
Words: 271 - Pages: 2
