Premium Essay

Qht Task 1

In: Business and Management

Submitted By caholbrook3211
Words 434
Pages 2
QHT1: Business Management Tasks
Task 1: 304.1.3-04 2015

interoffice memorandum to: | Supervisor of XYZ Inc. | from: | | subject: | Quality consideration costs | date: | September 1, 2015 | | | | |
Looking over our products, there are three types of costs to utilize when quality considerations are made. These consist of appraisal, prevention, and failure costs.
To ensure and achieve good quality and fix any defect before our product reaches the consumer, we must consider appraisal costs. Appraisal costs include the measuring and evaluating of our products to assess compliance with standards. The costs of measuring and evaluating will come from inspections (which will also include the inspectors to conduct the inspections), and testing, which will include the equipment to conduct tests, labs, quality audits, and field testing. Importantly, appraisal costs have the potential to significantly lower any future failure costs that may be incurred. The trade-off for the cost of taking the time and effort to inspect, audit, and conduct field testing will give viable information for not only the company but to the consumer as well that we produce and believe in quality products; resulting in a higher return of quality.
To prevent the possibility of defects occurring we must invest in prevention costs. These costs will ultimately aid in consumer satisfaction and decrease products returned on account of defective workmanship by paying an exuberant amount of attention towards the design and production phases. In order to do this, we must work with vendors, administrative systems, and take the time and effort to plan, train, and educate more people on quality control procedures. The trade-off of this investment will ensure and enrich the company’s culture of quality satisfaction, resulting in a decrease of returned products, higher

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Qht Task 1 Rubric

...RUBRIC TERMS The following terms may be used in the rubric. accurate – giving a correct or truthful representation; providing information that meets the accepted standard applicable – connected with, or relevant to a particular person, group of people, or situation adequate – as much as necessary for the purpose; acceptable applicable - affecting, connected with, or relevant to a particular person, group of people, or situation appropriate - fitting; suitable for the circumstances, topic, purpose, or context; suitable for an academic or professional setting articulation of response (clarity, organization, mechanics) - clear, organized, and easy to understand; standard language usage competent - possessing basic abilities and skills necessary to adequately function in specified areas credible – believable; based in solid research or accepted as sound practice in the field effective - producing the intended result detail - extended information on particular items does not meet standard - not performing at an appropriate or expected level; providing no support for reasoning limited - having narrow scope; barely adequate; including only a part logical - sensible and based on facts; appropriate progression of steps or events plausible - believable and appearing to be true; acceptable strategy or plan for the given situation reasonable - sensible; acceptable and according to common sense; likely to be considered appropriate for the given situation relevant - having some sensible or...

Words: 277 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Merchant

...MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives Second Edition Kenneth A, Merchant University of Southern California Wim A. Van der Stede London School of Economics Lffir Prentice Hall FINANCIAL Th,tES An impriil of P Harlow, England . London ' eatson Education New York . Boston . san Francisco . Toronlo Sydney. Tokyo . Singapore. Hong Kong .Seoul. Taipei. New Delhi Cape Town . Madrid . Mexico City . Amsterdam ' Munich . Paris. Mian "@@64wrw MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL in organizations. Management contlol \ fianagemenr conrrol is a critical function o In Aplil 2005, employees at the 75-year-old California-based not-for'-proirt Gemological Institute of America (GIA), the world's largest grader of diamonds, were accused of accepting bribes fi'om large diamond dealers to inflate diarnond grades. Large diamond can lead to large financial losses, r'eputation damage, and possibly even to organizational failure. Here are some recent examples: IYlfaitures dealers rvouid submit proportionally high bids, often 20 to 30qa highel than prevailing bids fol lough stones. knowing that they would be able to sell these stones at a profit because they bribed GIA staff to get a higher-than-deserved grade. A small differ-ence in grade can mean a huge difference in price, often hundreds of thousands of dollars on larger diamonds. The size of the blibes is unknown, but the probe into the allegations...

Words: 28154 - Pages: 113