...R. WILLIAMS R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC Employment Law for Human Resource Practice Professor Jama Rand Mishell December 2, 2012 Introduction This case is based around the laws and regulations of OSHA. OSHA is an Occupational Safety and Health Act that has been put into place to ensure the safety of employees while on the job. These regulations are put into place to help reduce the number of on the job injuries and death. In this case, Williams Construction was put under investigation after a trench collapse, which resulted in the death of one employee and a serious injury in another. After the investigation Williams was charged with four OSHA violations that all resulted in expensive fines. What was the legal issue in this case? This case is followed by the laws and regulations of OSHA. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Act) is an organization that has been put into place to ensure the safety of employees while on their jobs In this case with Williams Construction the company was put under investigation after a trench collapse, which resulted in the death of one employee Jose Aguiniga and a serious injury to another employee Adam Palomar. After the investigation, OSHA charged Williams Construction with four violations that all resulted in expensive fines. The violations found from the investigation included; 1. The failure to instruct employees and managers on how to recognize and avoid hazardous work conditions...
Words: 738 - Pages: 3
...case of R. Williams Construction CO. v. OSHRC, the legal issue is employees of R. Williams Construction CO. were not properly trained to do their job and death as well as serious injuries occurred in the results. On September 19, 2002, a trench collapse at a sewer-construction project at the Chumash Casino Project in California seriously injuring Adam Palomar and killed Jose Aguiniga. Both Adam Palomar and Jose Aguiniga were employees of R. Williams Construction Company working on the construction project. Palomar and Aguiniga were responsible for cleaning the pumps throughout any given workday without getting specific instructions. The day of the accident, both Palomar and Aguiniga entered the unshored trench to clean the pumps for approximately fifteen minutes. As they began to exit the trench, a wall collapsed and almost buried Adam Palomar and completely buried Jose Aguiniga in which he died. The day before the accident, the hydraulic jack shoring system was removed. The hydraulic jack shoring system supported the trench wall that collapsed. Explain what the employer did or failed to do that violated the OSH Act. The R. Williams Construction Company failed to properly train their employees. The Company did not instruct its employees in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and in the regulations applicable to their work environment. The Company failed to ensure that no worker would have to travel more than 25 feet to reach a safe point egress. The R. Williams...
Words: 891 - Pages: 4
...activitymode.com/product/hrm-510-week-8-assignment-4/ Contact us at: SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM HRM 510 WEEK 8 ASSIGNMENT 4 Assignment #4 - R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC Read the R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC case. You are to write a 3-4 page report that answers the following questions: What was the legal issue in this case? Explain what the employer did or failed to do that violated the OSH Act. Explain why it was "unavailing for Williams to argue that employees must take greater care to avoid placing themselves in harm's way." Explain what role, if any, employees' actions should have in determining liability under the OSH Act. Activity mode aims to provide quality study notes and tutorials to the students of HRM 510 Week 8 Assignment 4 in order to ace their studies. HRM 510 WEEK 8 ASSIGNMENT 4 To purchase this visit here: http://www.activitymode.com/product/hrm-510-week-8-assignment-4/ Contact us at: SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM HRM 510 WEEK 8 ASSIGNMENT 4 Assignment #4 - R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC Read the R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC case. You are to write a 3-4 page report that answers the following questions: What was the legal issue in this case? Explain what the employer did or failed to do that violated the OSH Act. Explain why it was "unavailing for Williams to argue that employees must take greater care to avoid placing themselves in harm's way." Explain what role, if any, employees' actions...
Words: 454 - Pages: 2
...R. Williams Construction Co. V. OSHRC Katrina Dickey Strayer University Dr. Banks HRM 510-Business Employment Law December 1, 2013 R. Williams Construction Co. V. OSHRC Safety has been on the top of the list since many can remember. Having safety work practices can make or break a company. It did just that for R. Williams Construction Company. OSHA (Occupational Saftey and Health Act) was put into place to help protect employers and employees. When regulations are not followed it could cause employers money and employees injury. In this paper it will review the case of R. Williams Construction Company V. OSHRC, discuss the legal issues in the case, and analyze why R. Williams construction Company was fined for over three safety violations. What was the legal issue in this case? The legal issue in the case R. Williams Construction Company v. OSHRC was the result after a trench collapsed, which resulted in the death of one employee from the construction company, Jose Aquiniga and serious injury of another employee, Adam Palomar. After close investigation, OSHA charged R. Williams Construction Company with four violations that all resulted in expensive fines. The violations included failure to instruct employees and managers on how to recognize and avoid hazardous work conditions. The next is the failure to ensure that employees did not have to travel more than twenty-five feet to safe zone. (Walsh, 2010) Third was the failure to have a competent person who was specifically...
Words: 838 - Pages: 4
...R. Williams Construction v OSHRC Rachel R. Taylor Strayer University Business Law -510 Dr. Laqua Perkins June 1, 2014 On September 19, 2002, a trench collapse at a sewer-construction project at the Chumash Casino Project in Santa Ynez, California, killed Jose Aguiniga, a Williams employee, and seriously injured Adam Palomar, another Williams employee. On the day of the collapse, the trench was ten to twelve feet deep and between three and four feet wide at the bottom. The trench was about thirteen feet wide at the top and more than forty feet long. The sides of the trench rose vertically from the bottom for approximately five feet, after which they sloped backwards at about a forty-five degree angle. An earthen slope at the west end of the trench provided the workers' only access to and egress from the bottom. Ground water seeped into the soil continuously. Williams used a number of submersible pumps to remove the ground water that seeped into the trench. Although the pumps could be pulled up and cleaned from the top of the trench, it was the practice to do so from inside the trench. Adam Palomar and Jose Aguiniga, two Williams’s employees, were generally responsible for cleaning the pumps and did so as needed throughout any given workday without receiving specific instructions. On the day before the accident, a hydraulic jack shoring system, which supported the trench wall, had been removed. On the day of the accident, Palomar and Aguiniga entered the...
Words: 1331 - Pages: 6
