Free Essay

Ranking Criteria

In: Business and Management

Submitted By lalas77
Words 343
Pages 2
Ranking Criteria
Ranking Criteria
Based on the scenario and approximate amount of this project of $100,000 (which is within the simplified acquisition threshold), my selection team will only consist of myself, the technical representative (from the program office), and the contracting officer. The evaluation factors that we have decided to employ are:

 Technical capability
 Past Performance
 Price
The method that we will use in evaluating the proposals is the trade-off process or better known as best value. Trade-off process puts more emphasis on non-price factors and awards the contract to the vendor that offers the best value rather than the one whose proposal has the lowest price. Using the trade-off process gives the government the flexibility to trade off among cost or price and non-cost evaluation factors such as the contractor’s technical capabilities, management capabilities, qualifications, and experience.

It will be clearly indicated in the solicitation package on the relative order of importance of the evaluation factor which will state as follows:

The following five criteria will be evaluated in order of importance. All non-price factors are listed in descending order of importance, with the most important criterion listed first.

Criteria 1-5 combined are significantly more important than price.

Price will not be scored, but its reasonableness and fairness will be evaluated.

1. Technical capability
2. Past performance
3. Corporate experience
4. Key personnel
5. Quality assurance

The evaluation team considered only two criteria for this requirement since this project has a relatively small dollar value and restricted the competition to 100% small business set-aside.

Experiences not considering for contractor’s as an evaluation factor will give new small business owner a better chance.

As part of the solicitation package, past performance questionnaire letter will be included. Prospective bidders will be required to provide this letter to representatives of previous contracts that they have performed in the past.

The response to the questionnaire letter must be sent directly to me (the Contract Administrator) and will be evaluated as part of the source selection process.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Threat Ranking

...WWF Project & Programme Standards Step 1.4 Define: Threat Ranking July 2007 Step 1.4 Threat Ranking Contents What Is a Threat Ranking?................................................................................................... 1 Why Is Threat Ranking Important? ..................................................................................... 1 When To Use Threat Rankings ............................................................................................ 1 How To Do a Threat Ranking ............................................................................................... 1 1. Determine the criteria for ranking .................................................................................................2 2. Apply the threat ranking................................................................................................................3 3. Sum up your threats across all targets to get an overall ranking for the site ...............................4 4. Classify each threat ......................................................................................................................4 Other Methods for Threat Ranking...................................................................................... 6 References............................................................................................................................. 6 Annex 1: Other Methods for Threat Ranking......

Words: 4482 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

Individual Performance Review

...ndIvIdual Performance revIew (IPr) Guidelines for Supervisors and employees September 2011 Human Resources IndIvIdual Performance revIew (IPr) 2 Table of conTenTS Individual Performance Review (IPR) Guidelines Definition of Terms CHaPTeR 1: Goals How it works CHaPTeR 2: RevIew How it works n Preparing for the meeting n In the meeting n after the meeting CHaPTeR 3: aPPRaIsal (YeaR-enD aPPRaIsal) How it works n Preparing for the meeting n In the meeting n after the meeting CHaPTeR 4: PeRfoRmanCe RankInG How it works n Preparing for the ranking panel n ranking panel session CHaPTeR 5: ouTComes How it works n Preparing for the discussion n discussion n Performance share nomination n Pay outcomes appendix - factors affecting Performance Ranking 3 4 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 10 10 11 within the objectives of simplifying and standardising Hr processes across the Shell Group, these global guidelines are distributed for adoption by Shell Group companies. any resulting changes to current practices may require, in some locations, compliance checks with local legislation and/or consultation with employee representative bodies. no rights can be derived from this guide and the process described within is not contractually binding in relation to terms and conditions of employment or agreements with Trade unions or Staff councils. This guide is intended for managers and employees of the Shell Group and is consequently for internal Shell use......

Words: 2535 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Scoring Methods for Decision Making

...Ranking the Best Universities Assignment Content Decision Making Skills 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 2. Methodology ................................................................................................................ 4 2.1. Classification .................................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM)....................................................................... 5 3. Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 5 3.1. Alternatives ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Criteria............................................................................................................................... 6 3.3. Decision Matrix ................................................................................................................ 7 3.4. Simple Additive Weighted Method (SAW) ...................................................................... 8 3.5. Weighted Product Method (WPM) .................................................................................. 9 3.6 Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOSIS) ........................ 10 3.7.......

Words: 4872 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

The Investment Detective

...to perform initial ranking based on the cash flows overview, although it will not be sufficient to determine the true profitability. In this case the ranking of the projects is the following – 3, 5, 8, 4, 1, 7, 6 and 2. This ranking is supported by the excess of cash flows (CF). 2. What criteria might you use to rank the projects? Which quantitative ranking methods are better? Why? Based on the theory of the capital budgeting evaluation techniques, the investments consideration will be analyzed upon Net Present Value (NPV), Payback period and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). The concepts will support ranking from the greatest project to less attractive one. First criteria that is used for ranking is the NPV method. It is considered as the most useful method because it is based on Cash Flows of the projects throughout their entire period. Of course it incorporates the time value of money concept and represents net value of the projects or net benefit that accrues to the company. Ranking assessment will consider as acceptable investment only projects with positive NPV. The second criterion is the IRR evaluation method. It is also an alternative to NPV method. Basically IRR is a discount rate that equates the present value of project’s expected cash flows to the initial invested amount. The successful ranking criteria for the acceptable projects, is to have IRR greater than the company’s required rate of return. In this case the accuracy of projects ranking will not be......

Words: 766 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Synopsis and Objectives

...the principal capital-budgeting criteria. A second objective is to consider the problem that arises when net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) disagree as to the ranking of two mutually exclusive projects. Finally, the case is a vehicle for introducing the problem created by attempting to rank projects of unequal life and the solution to that difficulty—the equivalent-annuity criterion. (Questions for this case are on page 257) THE INVESTMENT DETECTIVE Comparative Analysis of Investments 1. Project free cash flows (in thousands of dollars) Project number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Initial investment $(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) Year 1 $ 330 $1,666 $160 280 $2,2001 $1,200 $(350) 2 330 3341 200 280 9001 (60) 3 330 $ 165 350 280 300 60 4 330 395 280 90 350 5 330 432 280 $ 70 700 6 330 4401 280 1,200 7 3301 442 280 $2,2501 8 $1,000 444 2801 9 446 280 10 448 280 11 450 280 12 451 280 13 451 280 14 452 280 15 $10,0001 $(2,000) $ 280 Synopsis and Objectives This case presents the cash flows of eight unidentified investments, all of equal initial investment size. The task is to rank the projects. The first objective of the case is to examine critically the principal capital-budgeting criteria. A second objective is to consider the problem that arises when net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) disagree as to the ranking of two mutually exclusive......

Words: 3248 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Pad 500 Week 3 Dq Custom Order

...Evaluate the importance of each major steps in policy analysis as it relates to political choice. Next, debate if one would conside any of these steps more important than another. Procvide a rationale to support your answer. There are five steps that most Policy Analysts attempt to follow and these are: • Definition of the problem • Setting objectives and criteria • Developing alternatives • Analyzing various policies • Ranking and choosing Under the Definition of Problem Policy analysts need to decide which of the problems facilng public organisations are most pressing. There are several questions that need answers, the analyst must seek a clear statement of the problem, information of the nature and range of solutions. These questions include but not limited to: who is affected? Why has the problem surfaced? How does this problem relate to similar problems? E.g. building homes for the disabled: The analyst should be informed about the time or money and the limitations. He/she can talk to those who did similar jobs. Setting Objective and Criteria In setting the objective and criteria, the analyst should be able to say what the project is worth for the agency to achieve result A instead of B, e.g. routing a highway, the factors to be considered are the cost of the project, how many people will use the high way, number of houses and other properties that might be displaced, impact of noise and pollution on adjacent neighborhoods. These......

Words: 889 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Job Evaluation

...and Technological Stuff Visit... www.thecodexpert.com The job-evaluation process starts defining objectives of evaluation and ends with establishing wage and salary differentials. The main objective of job evaluation, as was stated earlier, is to establish satisfactory wage and salary differentials. Job analysis should precede the actual program of evaluation. Job analysis, as was discussed earlier, provides job-related data, which would be useful in drafting job description and job specification. A job-evaluation program involves answering several questions: The major ones are: • • • • • • Which jobs are to be evaluated? Who should evaluate the jobs? What training do the evaluation need? How much time is involved? What should be the criteria for evaluation? What methods of evaluation are to be employed? Which jobs are to be evaluated in any exercise, where there are more than 30 or 40 jobs to be evaluated, it is necessary to identify and select a sample of benchmark jobs, which can be used for comparisons inside and outside the organs. The benchmark jobs should be so selected to achieve representative sample of each of the main levels of jobs in each of the principal occupations. The size of the sample depends on the number of different jobs to be covered. It is likely to be less than about five percent of the total number of employees in the organization and it would be difficult to produce a balanced sample unless at least 25 percent of the distinct jobs at each......

Words: 2538 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Ahp Overview

...evaluation. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multicriteria decision support method designed to select the best from a number of alternatives evaluated with respect to several criteria.It is taken by carrying out pairwise comparison from which priorities are developed which can be used in ranking the alternatives. Criteria used in the AHP based approach to data quality assessment in banking are 1)Accuracy; 2)Completeness; 3)Consistency; 4) Timeliness; 5)Uniqueness; and 6)Validity. These criteria also have further subcriteria, for example under Completeness, sub criteria include Account Information, Customer information, Data Records and Interface files while a subcriteria under Accuracy is Business Indicator Range. All these variables are taken into consideration in ranking data quality. For ranking the data quality, a five step approach is adopted. 1)Structure the evaluation of hierarchy.(Goal level, criteria level, subcriteria level and alternative level) 2)Construct pairwise comparison matrices. 3)Obtain the priorities vector. 4)Test consistency 5)Weigh data quality weight and evaluate. Dimension judgement matrix is used to see reciprocal relation between two criteria. For the priorities vector, eigen vector is calculated for each relative judgement matrix and the eigen vector is normalized.This vector gives us the relative importance of each subindex to data quality.Consistency test value can be computed by taking the ratio of Consisteny index and Average......

Words: 399 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Webometrics Rating Improvement as a Marketing Strategy

...Running Head: WEBOMETRICS RANKING AND RATING IMPROVEMENT 1 Webometrics Rating and Ranking Improvement as a Marketing Strategy Sintyadi Thong Universitas Mercu Buana WEBOMETRICS RANKING AND RATING IMPROVEMENT Abstract Webometrics (www.webometrics.info) has been used as one of the tools when making 2 decisions in choosing a University. When a prospect has several choices of Universities providing the same area of study, rating and ranking would come into consideration as the final – if not, an assessed weight in the decision making. Rating and ranking also shows the performance indicator and also shows how prestigious the University is. Through Webometrics, prospects can see the ranking of a University either regionally or internationally based on their rating, and the rating and ranking are updated periodically. Many Universities adopted this rating and ranking system on their own website as their marketing strategy to show that they are better than competitor Universities and the use of Webometrics can be analysed as it displays the University's prestige. This paper will discuss the us of Webometrics as marketing strategy by improving the University's rating and ranking in Webometrics. keyword(s): Webometrics, University rating, marketing strategy, web impact. WEBOMETRICS RANKING AND RATING IMPROVEMENT Webometrics Rating and Ranking Improvement as a Marketing Strategy 3 Over the past few decades, internet grows wider, information gathering has been made simple.......

Words: 3080 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

The Investment Detective

...present time before comparing. 2. What criteria might you use to rank the projects? Which quantitative ranking methods are better? Why? There are several criteria that we can use to rank the projects. Some of the criteria are as follows: 1) IRR 2) Payback Period 3) NPV NPV results in the best rankings ( I have shown the NPV values towards the bottom of the exhibit). This is because of the following reasons: 1) IRR only works if the series of cash flows result in an initial outlay followed by future inlay. Any sequence of cash flows that does not support this, will not yield accurate results with the IRR method. Also, IRR just gives a percentage. Thus, it ignores the magnitude of cash flows. 2) Payback period simply ignores the time value of money, which is a major flaw of this methodology. Because of the above drawbacks of IRR and Payback period, NPV is usually considered the best method for capital budgeting. 3. What is the ranking you found by using quantitative methods? Does this ranking differ from the ranking obtained by simple inspection of the cash flows? Ranking obtained by using NPV Method (please see the attached Excel File): 1. Project 6 2. Project 2 3. Project 7 4. Project 4 Ranking obtained by using IRR Method (please see the attached Excel File): 1. Project 6 2. Project 2 3. Project 7 4. Project 4 Ranking obtained by using Payback Method (please......

Words: 876 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Dsasfd

...Country risk and country attractiveness model Methodology of a country selection model 193 Countries Countries which have been eliminated based restriction criteria. 48 Countries Countries which have been eliminated based on selection criteria and the country ranking. 15 Countries Countries which have been eliminated based on in-depth selection. Selected countries for business activities 1. Selection step (Preselection) 2. Selection step (Rough selection) Checklist procedure with restriction criteria Weighted scoring model, g g , country ranking 3. Selection step (In-depth selection) Clustering g portfolio analysis, graphical analysis 1 Country risk and country attractiveness model Selection criteria and indicators 2nd selection step Criterion Indicator Criterion Country risk Country attractiveness Legal security Biomass potential Biomass productivity Available agricultural land Agricultural land p inhabitant g per Cost of biomass Biomass productivity Cost of land Cost of labour Land tenure Agricultural land per holding Transparency of land tenure Logistics Quality of roads (index) Quality of railway (index) Quality of ports (index) Political support Institutional support of FDIs Support of biomass projects Financial and fiscal incentives Sustainability Protection of property rights (Index) Risk of expropriation Indicator Political support for a......

Words: 456 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Statistics Project 1

...for EACH judge * Probability of reversal given an appeal for EACH judge * Ranking of each judge within each court. State the criteria you are using for your ranking AND provide the rationale for your choice. * Analysis: Who is doing a good job AND who is not? Why do you think so? Use your created ranking criteria to analyze the data  1. Probability of cases appealed and reversed in each court The Common Pleas Court, the probability of an appeal is 0.0401 Domestic Relation Court, the probability of an appeal is 0.00384 Municipal Court, the probability of an appeal is 0.00461 The unconditional probability of an appeal across all 3 courts is (1762/43945)*(198/43945) +(106/30945)*(17/30945) +(500/108464)*(104/108464) = 1.87*10^-4 2. Probability of case being appeal for each judge were given 5 columns of the table and it come out to this. (1762 +106+500)/(43945+30495+108464)=0.0129 3. For this case the judges were given 7 columns of the table. Judges Winkler Panioto, and Grady have to lowest probability of reversal for Common Pleas, Domestic Relations, and Municipal Courts. All of these are probabilities of reversal for all cases disposed of and not only for one appealed. 4. The probability for the reversal was given 9 columns for each judge. The judges Panioto, Grady/Hair, and Nurre are the lowest probability of reversal. 5. The Cincinnati Enquirer provided ranking for each judges within each of the courts on percentage of cases appealed,......

Words: 360 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Rajeev Singh

...Table of Contents Problem Faced 2 Introduction 2 Key Decision Criteria 3 Alternatives analysis 4 Recommendations Action and Implementation Plan Conclusion Appendix References Problem Faced Rajeev Singh wants to decide whether he should invest more financial resources into his suffering business. He sees alternatives that could potentially turn the business around but is unsure at ultimately what he should do. Competition is becoming fierce in the furniture industry since there are few barriers to enter the market. Consumers will also shop around for the lowest price, since the price is more important than the brand recognition. When deciding what we thought Rajeev should do, we have determined alternatives that we feel would be the most successful for the business. To determine each alternative, we came up with charts comparing each criteria for the major factors that we decided were most important for the success of Rajeev. By using the SWOT analysis we found the strengths to focus on and the weaknesses to be aware of. We then compiled charts to score each option. Introduction The furniture industry has been and continues to be very important industry in probably almost all countries in the world, which have or don't have large forest resources. Like other industries, the furniture industry “is rapidly growing while......

Words: 1560 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Csec 630

... 1. The relative advantages and disadvantages of at least three different measures used to protect operating systems. 2. The ease of implementation of the measures. 3. The associated security management issues related to measures discussed above. 4. The ranking of the measures from best to worst with supporting rationale. Prepare your paper in Word. Include a minimum of 5 sources. The citations and the reference list in the paper should be formatted in accordance with APA 6th edition guidelines. The assignment is due at the end of the session week 7. Before you submit your paper, you will need to run your assignment through Turnitin.com and receive an originality report. DO NOT WAIT TO THE LAST MINUTE TO DO THIS. It might take several hours to do this. Resubmissions can take a day or more. For instructions, go to " Basic Turnitin Instructions" in the General Information module. After it meets all of the stated criteria, submit the paper AND the originality report in your Assignments Folder. * DUE DATE: End of Week 7 (Two Week assignment – Week 6 and Week 7). CSEC630 Individual Assignment Grading Criteria This assignment is worth 10 percent of your total grade. Criteria | Excellent A (90+) | Satisfactory B (80-89) | Below Expectations (below 80) | Content (80%) | | | | Clarity of discussion of relative advantages and disadvantages of at least three different measures used to protect Operating Systems (0-25 points) | The......

Words: 666 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Glass Cieling

...The expression glass ceiling had been used to describe the artificial barrier placed on individuals that prevent them from advancing to high ranking positions within an organization despite the fact they are qualified. Although the glass ceiling can be experienced by any individual, it is primarily encountered by women. While many people realize the glass ceiling is still intact, some believe it has been broken by women. There are many factors in today’s work environment that allude to the fact that women are still facing the glass ceiling. Understanding what is holding women under the glass ceiling and what they bring to organizations when in higher ranking positions will make it all the more possible for women to break through the glass ceiling. While some women have broken through the glass ceiling, many still feel as though they are being held back. In a 2011 study it was found that in America women made up less than eighteen percent of senior managers in companies (Too Many Suits, 2). This small number can be contributed to many factors that keep women from advancing in the workplace. A primary reason holding women back is the outdated gender roles that are rooted deep inside many people’s minds. Professor Macarie and administrative and communication specialist Moldovan agree with Snowdon, Guardian business editor, in the belief that gender stereotypes have a lot of impact on keeping women from advancing in the workplace. Generally women are perceived as......

Words: 1397 - Pages: 6