Free Essay

Reality Tv

In: Film and Music

Submitted By alexds
Words 2389
Pages 10
Grierson referred to the documentary as a text that has ‘documentary value’(Grierson, 1926). Using this definition as a starting point, discuss whether ‘reality’ TV should be classified as a documentary.
“We take television for granted in the same way as we take everyday life for granted.” (Silverstone, 2000) Reality television, being a mix of the two, is often an over-looked and disrespected television genre, as it can seem worthless and therefore worthy of the term ‘trash TV’. However it appears that reality television has started to take over our screens and is pushing other, more reputable genres out of the schedule. John Grierson is said to be the man who first coined the phrase ‘documentary’ and therefore documentarians often look back to his quotes and theories to be used as the bible for accepting or rejecting television shows into the genre.

Grierson used the quote when he was evaluating Robert Flaherty’s film Moana. Flaherty, producer of Nanook of the North, used actors to portray the characters in the documentary rather than the people themselves, which conflicted with Grierson’s principles, arguing that using the real person in their original environment, “thus taken from the raw” are far better than a fictional alternative. However vague Grierson’s quote may seem, it is clear what he intended by it. The word ‘documentary’ comes from the Latin root ‘docere’, meaning to teach or instruct, however the more modern relation is to ‘document’, which is a factual record of information or instruction. Grierson’s quote simply says that if a programme contains the characteristics and the aims of a documentary then it should be classed as a documentary. The problem with this quote however is that in the 21st Century, technology and therefore creativity has improved significantly and so documentarians are making programmes in completely new ways to before, not only because of the improvements in equipment but also the fact that competition has also therefore risen, so they need to be able to stand out from the rest. These lines between genres has consequently become more and more blurred and it is subsequently made harder to pin-point the genre of some television shows. Documentary as with all other genres “escapes any tight generic specification”, and “what we understand by ‘documentary’ is always dependent on the broader context of the kinds of audiovisual documentation currently in circulation.“ (Corner 2002: p.125) Nevertheless, the majority of documentaries are factually based and aspire to educate the audience about a certain topic that is often talking about political, ethical or social issues. It will usually also aim to ask and answer questions throughout the show and is often a stand-alone piece, or at least has no episodic ‘carry-on’ factor.

Reality television has become extremely popular over the past 10 years with the arrival of large budget talent contests, competition shows as well as the more recent structured reality shows. It may appear bland and basic, but it seems the content that the public like to watch the most involves ‘ordinary’ people. The fact that the audience can relate to them is a clear reason to why this may be; together with the attraction of how simple becoming a celebrity can be with just 15 minutes of fame. Regardless of the context, reality shows always show real people in a real environment and thrives off their different reactions to being put into specific situations. Therefore due to the factuality of it, it is easy to find examples of where the genre fits into that of a documentary. However the genre is incredibly broad, where “at one end of the continuum” between fact and fiction “are informative based programmes such as Animal Hospital, and at the other end are documentary gameshows such as Survivor”; (Hill, p.50) so it is therefore very likely that ‘reality’ will merge with other genres in some way.

Annette Hill describes in her book ‘Reality TV’ how reality television can be split into a number of sub-genres including “infotainment, docusoap, lifestyle, and reality gameshow” (Hill: p.39) with constantly more being added such as the recently popular ‘Structured Reality’ shows. Docusoaps are programmes, which contain a “combination of observational documentary, and character-driven drama” (Hill: p.27). An example of this would be Airline, which follows the daily tasks of certain members of staff who work at Easyjet airline. Through the series we begin to get to know the different characters in the show. The storylines of docusoaps often continue week by week, usually with an episodic roundup at the start of each episode, and a flash-forward to the next episode as a way to entice viewers back week by week. This format is very rarely used in documentaries due to there never being recurring themes or characters. This sounds similar to the more recent ‘structured reality’ programmes but the fact that we are also accompanied with a voice over narration, a characteristic fitting with the observational documentary style, sets it aside. Bill Nichols explains how the observational documentary “affords the viewer the opportunity to look in on and over-hear something of the lived experience of others” (Nichols, 1991: 42), this can certainly be said of the majority of Reality TV shows whether the camera is following the life of the emergency services in Traffic Cops or members of the public in Big Brother. It seems a “primal pleasure” (Baudrillard, 1986) to have this ability to peer into the lives of others whether this is simply sat ‘people watching’ on the train or tuning into daily updates on social networking websites. So the success of reality television is clearly due to encouraging us to continue this guilty pleasure by openly providing us with the content. ‘Docusoaps’ are the main example of how blurred the barrier is between documentary and reality, with large aspects of observational documentary mixed with the reality qualities in the involvement of regular characters, and for this reason it would be difficult to define Airline solely as a documentary.

The ‘infotainment’ sector includes the original style of reality shows that follow the role of the emergency services seen in programmes such as Crimewatch and Traffic Cops. Traffic Cops takes an observational style by following the emergency services in their day-to-day work. John Corner described reality television as having a number of phases, the first where “popular factual television was ‘reality television’, with a focus on the work of police and emergency services” (Corner, 2000: p.687) With Crimewatch being an exception, infotainment shows are predominantly based on location whether that is inside of a police vehicle or in the station, with some sort of Voice-Over narration explaining what is going on in the scene. From time-to-time there are also on-location interviews with the victims or the officers on the scene, which break the observational aspect of the program, and now turns it into a live conversation. Both Crimewatch and Traffic Cops use ‘floating head’ interviews, usually with victims of crime, which take place off-location in a set up environment. These interviews are very similar to what you may see in a documentary such as the BBC’s 7/7: One Day in London which contains testimonials of people who were affected by the London Terrorist attack on July 7th 2005. Together with this, Crimewatch includes reconstruction elements, a technique that you would often see used in historic documentaries, if there is not sufficient actuality footage. Crimewatch uses reconstructions to animate the crimes that they are focusing on for that episode, in a hope it will help to solve the crimes. For this reason Crimewatch has become a public service programme, by also broadcasting its Crimewatch Update follow up, after the BBC News, which informs viewers of any results from the earlier programme. Infotainment has a very clear link to the characteristics of the documentary genre, giving factual information about real people in their real environment, and making the viewer seem as though they are there through the observational documentary style.

The reason why shows like Crimewatch have this reality classification is due to their use of a live studio presenter as well as the audience’s instant access to the programme’s content across various forms of media. The show invites viewers to phone in or visit the website to find out more information about the crimes and to give across any knowledge they have that may help with the investigation. There are “hundreds of reality TV websites devoted to keeping viewers informed about a range of reality programmes” (Hill, 2005: p.5) across all of the sub-genres, especially with talent and game shows which thrive off their presence on social networking sites and advertisement in the press. This live aspect would not be available in documentary, as they are always pre-recorded, so should this mean that reality programmes are simply a ‘live’ form of documentary?

Game shows and talent shows are likely to be the sub-genre that most people associate with ‘reality television’. This is mainly due to programmes such as XFactor and Britain’s Got Talent which have become the largest television shows of the time, bringing in 16.6 and 18.5million viewers respectfully in 2009 and 2010, making them the most watched programme of the year; an award which in the 20 years prior was commonly given to soaps such as Coronation Street or prestigious dramas for example Only Fools and Horses. It is clear that the introduction of social networking and ease of cheap contact has helped tremendously to allow reality programmes to adapt and to become the most popular genre on our screens at the moment. Viewers clearly prefer to have some sort of involvement with the programme rather than simply being a passive observer. By having this participation, they are able to help sculpt and direct the content of the programmes they watch, similarly to television on demand, whether it is voting who stays in week-by-week or by determining who should take part in the daily tasks on I’m a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here. This aspect is not possible with documentaries and dramas; therefore this may be the reason why infotainment and docusoaps have replaced original documentaries. It seems that “a lot of [reality shows] used to be called documentaries, but people are now just more inventive with them,” (Deans, 2003) with the improvement in technology, documentarians may be producing their documentaries in reality format, meaning that reality should perhaps not be classed as documentary but should be classed as a genre, which has encompassed documentary.

The newest addition to the reality genre is ‘structured reality’ television such as Made in Chelsea. These shows follow a group of friends and acquaintances in their hometown of Chelsea, London. The style of the show is similar to that of a soap opera with the cameras listening in to different conversations and following cast members in their day-to-day lives. There has been a lot of controversy following these scripted reality shows due to viewers being unsure of the ‘reality’ of them. The Only Way Is Essex clearly now displays to its audience how the “tans you see might be fake but the people are all real—although some of what they do has been set up purely for your entertainment.” It is understood that the characters and conversations in these programs are completely unscripted, however the directors will suggest conversation subjects or will set up certain scenarios for the characters to walk in to. This directorial interjection reflects another of Grierson’s quotes, which talks about “Creative Treatment of Actuality” (quoted in Winston, 1995, p.28). Directors commonly have a say in how a documentary will be edited together, and therefore have the ability to easily mould the audience’s view of a certain topic or person. This is similar to Structured reality shows, where the director will purposefully increase the tension of a scene by adding elongated pauses between the characters to add drama and therefore satisfy the viewers. These shows seem as though they are anything but a documentary, however the directorial influence is apparent in a lot of documentaries, namely propagandist films such as Triumph of the Will, which presents the Nazi congress in Nuremburg, and was sent out in order to make the German army seem daunting to the opposition.

Aside from the ‘game show’ genre, these all involve cameras going into real life environments which very much fits the characteristic of any documentary show. The majority of these sub-genres can be very relatable to those of documentaries, especially when filmed in an observational or fly-on-the-wall style. However due to reality being such a broad genre, it is clear that it is now “a term [that] has become something of a catch-all phrase.” (Kilborn 1994: p.423) Reality television clearly links to the factual nature of documentaries by inviting viewers into the lives of others. Some reality shows also contain contributor interviews and narrator voice-overs, which are very common characteristics of any documentary program. So it can very much be argued that reality shows are documentaries, especially when you are “taking the ‘raw’ ingredients of on-screen emergency services” rather than “’cooked’ reality formats such as reality gameshows” (Hill: p.44). However due to gameshows being a part of the reality genre, we cannot classify reality as a whole as documentary, we can simply suggest that some sub-genres contain “Documentary Value”

Baudrillard, J (1986). The Evil Demon of Images. Sydney: Power Institute of Fine Arts.

Corner, J (2000) ‘What Can We Say About ‘Documentary’? Media, Culture and Society

Corner, J (2002) ‘Documentary Values’, in A.Jerslev (ed.) Realism and ‘Reality’ in Film and Media, Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press

Deans, J (2003) ‘Reality TV is Here to Stay’. Online. Available at http://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/jan/27/realitytv.broadcasting (Accessed 8 January 2014)

Hill, A (2005). Reality TV: Audiences and Popular Factual Television. Abingdon: Routledge. p.5-44.

Kilborn, R (1994) ‘How Real Can You Get?’: Recent Developments in “Reality” Television’, European Journal of Communication

Nichols, B (1991). Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. USA: Indiana University Press.

Silverstone, R (1994). Television and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.

Winston, B (1995). Claiming The Real. London: British Film Institute.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Reality Tv

...Mariah Priester The Reality TV Phenomenon Many of us spend countless hours a week enjoying the shows that come on t.v. Years ago, television shows focused on the family, the strong bonds they shared, and building strong family ties. Shows like “The Brady Bunch”, “The Cosby Show” “Full House” and “Family Matters” were shows that could be enjoyed by the entire family. Today, television has taken on a new role, and it’s called “Reality T.V.” Reality TV are shows that observe real-life situations. They are t.v. programs that present real people in live, though often deliberately manufactured, situations and monitor their emotions and behavior. The industry now filled with unscripted dramas, makeover sagas, celebrity breakdowns, lifestyle-change shows, dating shows, talent searches and just about any kind of competition you can think of (and a few that you probably can't). In the fall 2007 season, there were more than a dozen reality shows in prime-time slots on major networks and cable channels. On any given night, you can watch "The Biggest Loser," "Dancing with the Stars," "The Real World," "I Love New York," "Beauty and the Geek," "America's Next Top Model," "Ultimate Fighter," "The Bachelor," "Run's House" or "Project Runway" -- to name just a few. Reality TV was created as an alternative to normal programs, and to boost channel ratings. Many shows were being cancelled due to low viewership. It has been since The Real World and Road Rules premiered on MTV back...

Words: 807 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Reality Tv

...Reality Television Reality TV and its influence on the younger generation. A. Media has a huge impact on how people truly see themselves, particularly inWomen and young female teens. Reality television has made the standards ofBeauty quite high these days and there is a definite change in society’s viewon what is truly beautiful. Turning off the TV has become too hard when it comes to reality TV shows. 1. Turning into their favorite movie star is becoming more natural than ever. Skipping meals to look like the girl on the cover of the magazine keeps manyPeople wandering what other lengths girls will go to look like someone else.These reality TV shows are gruesome and harmful to one when they say, “Reality television is a relatively new fad in America that is sweeping thenetworks ratings and redefining programming altogether. Viewers cannotseem to get enough of the torture, embarrassment, temptation, and above all, drama of other regular, everyday people being placed in unrealistic settingsand manipulated for the world to see. Leaving an everlasting affect, these shows do a lot of damage. B. Children consider makeup a necessity at a younger age. Reality TV has caused an obsession that is unavoidable. It is a crude form of entertainment, but so many people watch...

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Reality Tv

...When discussing reality television there is much debate over whether or not it has a positive or negative impact on society. Currently there are so many different types of reality television programming, that it is hard to determine which side to be on. Some reality programming has merit and it is understandable why it would be broadcasted, but other reality programming just produces garbage that should not be on television or even put on the internet for that matter. There is a major difference between the two though. Good reality TV should be able to keep broadcasting, but shows that are produced on MTV, VH1, and other networks should be banned from television because it promotes stereotypes in relation to race, gender, and ethnicity. In today’s infinitely expanding world of technology it is becoming easier and easier to influence the minds of viewers with TV, therefore reality TV poses a dangerous threat to society and the way are thoughts are molded. However not all reality TV is bad and should not be punished for the programming that is damaging our society’s future by changing our views and thoughts. When talking about reality TV that has a bad influence and is dangerous to society the first thing that should put into someone’s mind is any programming that is on MTV. MTV produces mind altering and numbing shoes that create stereotypes for gender, race, and class. There biggest success and the most dangerous show of all is their most popular show the “Jersey Shore”...

Words: 928 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Reality Tv

...1) The three texts are all about reality television, and how far the boundaries can be pushed for the highest viewer ratings. Text 2: “When Reality TV Gets Too Real” is written by Jeremy W peters. The text is focusing on whether it’s the television station and the team behind the cameras that have the responsible for actions the participants may do to themselves or others such as a crime, while participating on the show. The show Intervention running on A&E is a great example of how the boundaries have been pushed. The show is about the life of those who suffer from addiction and their family. People on the edge make good television and therefore will the people behind the show push the boundaries as far as possible. Situations in these kinds of shows can get out of hand and the participants can become a danger to themselves or others, here is the question asked when is the crew obligated to step out from behind the camera and intervene. The crew is looked at as witnesses and by the law in the United States, witnesses are not obligated to step in and save people or stop a crime. Intervention’s creator Sam Mettler says “This is their life with me or whiteout me”. To make a case, the accusing party must have proof that the subjects were put in danger by a situation created from the programs side. Mr. Mettler has stepped up and stopped participants from harming themselves or others. The A&E senior vice president assures that if a person is in immediate danger, then that’s...

Words: 1079 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Reality Tv

...In the media, reality TV stars like Snooki and Kim Kardashian are on the rise. Most channels on television have at least one reality show, from following housewives to remodeling homes of real life families. However, there are some reality programs that display bad examples, especially for young audiences that are keeping up with each episode. On MTV people see girls being drunk in public, addicts doing drugs, and young girls raising babies at young ages; these are situations seen on reality TV shows. Jeremy W. Peters’ “When Reality TV Gets Too Real” and James Poniewozik’s “Why Reality TV is Good for us” inform readers about what the general public can view on television and how it affects the minds of children. Reality TV shows such as Jersey Shore, 16 and Pregnant, Intervention, and The Real World all are bad for kids because they show inappropriate and explicit behavior, they send a bad message, and they humiliate people. For these reasons, parents should make sure their kids do not get the wrong message of how life should be. Reality TV shows are inappropriate and explicit. In Jersey Shore, Italians are portrayed as partyers and classified as Guidos and Guidettes. Actual Italians are disgusted since they think it is an insult to their Italian culture. Furthermore on MTV, young girls can be seen struggling with teen pregnancy. The show 16 and Pregnant follows expectant teens and their partners at a young age with a baby on the way struggling to maintain basic needs for themselves...

Words: 1067 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Reality Tv

...Troy McCall N. Bullard ENC1101 Do people really benefit from reality shows? I. Sample shows Jersey shore and Real House Wives. A. Reality shows have a demoralizing effect. B. Portrays too many negative people on TV as role models II. Sample show 16 and pregnant. A. The attitudes of the teens on these shows. B. How does this affect today’s teens. Do people benefit from reality television shows? I think that reality shows are not good for people to watch all the time because of all the negative aspects of the shows they have on, such as The Real Housewives, Sixteen and Pregnant and Jersey Shore. Television shows have given way to reality shows. Are reality TV shows, reality or are they scripted? Jersey shore is a reality show about a group of eight individuals that move in together in a summer share. The show did advertisements in the begging that sparked controversy by Italian American’s when they used the term Guido. The show also portrays a negative side of things. The cast members in my opinion were snobbish and superficial. To teens they might think it’s the in thing to tan your body or wear promiscuous clothing out to party’s. Reality shows also promote drinking and smoking. Often people watch reality shows to see how other people live, but most reality shows are nothing but negative demoralizing shows that gives its viewers a false impression of how people should respond or converse with each other. There are three shows that...

Words: 271 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Stereotypes Of Reality Tv

...Kardashians, Teen Mom, Desperate Housewives, Love and Basketball, do any of these titles ring a bell? These are some of the most popular reality tv shows on air right now. These shows are glorified, the people in them are worshipped, and the lives they live many could only dream of having. But do these tv shows and tv personalitys really deserve all this admiration? I think not. Really, the stereotypes these shows promote are very dangerous. They promote certain body images, certain lifestyles, and an unrealistic and careless view of money. Many young people are very insecure about how they look, and seeing these reality tv stars with perfect bodies only makes them feel worse. Reality TV promotes that smaller is better. These ideas push teens to extreme lenghths to acheive this look. Anorexia, belimia and other eating disorders are a result of the dangerous unrealistic stereotypes shown on reality tv....

Words: 444 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Reality Tv Rushdie

...In Salman Rushdie’s essay on reality TV, he argues that it is without substance, and will be the downfall of western society. He argues this by pointing out how young people are focused into their most controversial and awful traits. Contestants and stars are constantly trying to one-up each other in a competition of attention. People gobble up the content, going as far as to bring “Big Brother” to the front page of the tabloids during an important election. These are signs that indicate we are on a slippery slope, and eventually people will be willing to watch gladiatorial murder on TV, among other depraved things, to satisfy our need for controversy. This view of TV audiences, and the world of reality TV, is a shallow one. What Rushdie misses, is that Reality TV is a cheap form of entertainment, and it does not need to rise above the standard it is at now to keep making profits....

Words: 659 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Harsh Reality About Reality Tv

...The Harsh Reality about Reality Television Tasha Sutton ENG 122 English Composition II Instructor, Tina Santino March 28, 2013 The Harsh Reality about Reality Television What happen to the good old days when television programs had sweet, wholesome, honorable messages depicted to their viewer. Remember the sitcom, Family Matters, with Steve Erkel and the Winslow family. Brings a smile to your face, does it not? Television programs such as Family Matters, Saved by the Bell and Charles in Charge were great shows for every age. These shows, showed the viewer’s actors having a problem and how they solved it in a decent way that worked out for everyone. The audience knows that the characters are not real, but that does not change the message that they direct towards their viewers. Reality television is what is new and hip. The point of reality television is to make their viewers feel what they are seeing is indicative of everyday life. What most people do not realize is reality television is no different than a scripted, television show. Reality television caters to the negative emotions that make viewers want to see more television. Reality television programs are anything but wholesome. Reality television appeals more to our negative emotions and values, and has changed our viewing habits by decreasing family time and increasing television viewing times. These drastic changes that have occurred due to reality television has only changed society...

Words: 1672 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Harsh Reality Tv

...Harsh Reality TV Globalization is a reality. New technologies, such as TV and internet are being used every single minute all over the world. In the modern world, the media has a great impact on our lives. Among other things, television and internet keeps us updated with news from all over the world. But has Reality TV gone too far? And who are we to blame when young people’s behaviour are affected by it? “Harsh Reality TV” puts up a negative perspective of reality TV. The author L.B. Bozell states that the reason reality shows are so frequent is because the TV producers are more inclined to create cheap reality shows than expensive dramas. One of the greatest TV hits to this date is the TV-series “Friends”, which has cost Fox-TV 1 million dollars per episode for EACH of the six major characters. It is clear that Bozell feels that reality TV is more trouble than it is worth. He says that the shows are “cheap ego massage” (p. 11, l. 8) and “stupid (literally) shows” (l. 14), and he calls the participants “human camera fodder” (l. 6). He argues that today’s reality television is inappropriate for impressionable kids, such as his own seven-year-old son. Using statistics from a study made by the Parents Television Council, he explains that the overall rate of sex, foul language and violence in reality shows was 9,5 instances per hours. Most of today’s Reality TV shows are based on the fact that sex, dirty language and violence are much more interesting, when it is shown in genuine...

Words: 587 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Reality Tv and Modern Culture

...What Reality Television Says About Modern Culture: Essay One The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines reality television as “programming that features videos of actual occurrences.” Reality television has become an increasingly favorable genre of television shows, but society often fails to recognize how unrealistic these superficial shows have become. Many people enjoy reality television due to its ability of making viewers laugh, and step back from their own lives for a period of time. This television craze proves that modern culture has an altered view of reality, and has become progressively superficial due to the lack of education on the topic. Society claims that these shows are realistic, however they are often a scripted dramatization thriving to imitate real scenarios. Reality television allows viewers to escape the reality of their own lives because it is a removed way to experience emotions, and these shows that are supposedly “reality-based” are never filmed in a realistic setting. When viewers watch reality television, it offers them time to escape from the reality of their own lives. Producers carefully choose cast members that are diverse and represent a large population of society, to avoid criticism, but to also allow viewers to relate to at least one specific cast member. The average Canadian watches a show such as “Survivor” (which offers a one million dollar grand prize to the winner) and envies the superficial status that is temporarily given to...

Words: 1072 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Reality Tv Shows on Children

...Reality TV shows on children “Boys and girls alone” is a reality show aired in England in 2009. The protagonists, twenty boys and girls aged 8-11, live alone in two villages (one for the boys and one for the girls) without parents, and have to cook, clean, manage money, etc.,by themselves. In the texts I have been given to read, I am presented to three points of view about the show, from: Andrew Mackenzie, Head of Factual Entertainment at Channel 4, and one of the responsible for the making of “Boys and Girls Alone”. Dr. Richard House, Senior Lecturer in Psychotherapy. Audrey Scott, the mother of one of the kids in the show. In the first one, A. Mackenzie defends the show from criticism and explains that the children were “carefully chosen and screened by experts” and that they lived in a “protected environment with around-the-clock security during production”. He also claims that parents were allowed to withdraw their child at any time.All in all, he can only see positivity about the show. In the second one, Dr. R. House criticizes the show, and calls it “prurient Lord of the Flies sensationalism”. He disapproves of the whole concept, and goes as far as saying the show is equal child cruelty. He also urges Channel 4 to reveal the identity of the “experts” who chose and screened the children before going to the show, so they can enter into a public dialog. He is very critical about the culture in general as well, which he means to be superficial celebrity-obsessed...

Words: 868 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Reality Tv Consumes Lives

...In this paper, I will argue that reality television shows are produced merely for entertainment purposes and not for vicarious living through the principals of frontiersmanship. While reality television programs do provide some form of education, it is up to the viewer to differentiate between the notable and poor aspects of the reality television star’s life. In the popular TV show Jersey Shore, the American reality television series that premiered on MTV in December 2009, eight housemates spend their summer in the Jersey Shore in New Jersey. The show is heavily based on an Italian-American stereotype referred to as “Guidos” and “Guidettes.” Every episode includes alcohol and drama, which are typically directly related to one another. Rather than viewing their actions as an example of how to live your life in an improper fashion, it’s the viewer’s responsibility to establish the differences between right and wrong. Reality television shows typically exceed social norms, to attract a large number of viewers. A program where people are paid to act in a certain, bad mannered behavior is more likely to attract an audience than a program of an average family performs average actions and lives an average life style. Since such lifestyles are usually unattainable to the average American, some people may tend to live their life vicariously through a television program. In Jersey Shore Season 1 (Season 1, Episode 4: “Fade To Black”), two of the characters in the episode, Paul DelVecchio...

Words: 814 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Reality Tv Pros and Cons

...1: Reality or Hunger For Fame Reality Television: Consequences of Reality T.V on Society Reality television has become increasingly more popular and appears to be taking over the entertainment business. Psychologist Lawrence Rubin seems to think it all goes back to Aristotle and “The notion of being drawn to drama and tragedy” (Kinon, 2009). The viewer receives a false sense of “real life” and disconnects from their own “real life” by diving into someone else's. The effects that these television shows have on society as a whole can be positive or negative, depending on the message the show depicts. Shows such as “Jersey Shore”, “16 and Pregnant”, and “Dr. 90210” are a huge success to MTV, but could be considered detrimental to society by painting distorted pictures of reality in the viewer’s mind. Shows including “Extreme Home Makeover”, “Undercover Boss”, and “American Idol” can be considered to have a positive affect on society. These programs report the positive stories of the average, everyday person, inspiring the viewer. These shows reward well-mannered people doing amazing things around their community rather than rewarding poor behavior that is unacceptable to the everyday norms of our society. This discussion will convey the negative effects of reality television programs as well as the positive effects these programs have on society as a whole. We will also examine the steps marketers can do to take advantage of the high ratings of these reality shows to...

Words: 4013 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Impact of Reality Tv Shows on Youths

...The attitude of today's youth are affected by television programs. 1.0 INTRODUCTION “Televiewing causes people to duplicate inappropriately, in other areas of their lives, behavior styles developed while watching television.” (Kottak, 1990, p.3) Television programs can be educational as well as entertaining. It can give people the opportunity to travel around the globe, expose them to new ideas that they might not have encountered from their community and also a chance to learn about different cultures. Pro-social messages from shows on television will give a positive impact on the behavior of today's youth. However, these youths are more likely to learn negative values from these television programs. Television has now become a debatable issue as some question its influences on the attitude and psychological development of today's youth. Nowadays, the world of television has been discovered by children at very young age. As we know, television is an effective educational tool. With programs showcasing wildlife, scientific theories etc, it helps these children to be broad-minded and also have a better understanding about the world around them. However, we have to remember and be aware that the television also is seem to posses more negative effects than positive ones. A day in a youth's life will generally be filled with activities such as playing with friends, reading, doing homework and being physically active but this can be easily replaced with the presence of television...

Words: 4840 - Pages: 20