Premium Essay

Reflective Statement - Tupe

In:

Submitted By jlowe1995
Words 851
Pages 4
Reflective Statement
When delivering our training session it is important that a positive learning environment is created so that the learners are engaged and their experience is enhanced. To ensure this is the case, before starting the session we made everyone in the class aware of the basic health and safety rules and regulations. This means running through what to do in case of a fire and where the evacuation point is if the fire alarm goes off. This is important as it will help to make the learners feel safe and secure. It is also important that we introduced ourselves and mentioned a little about our background so that learners can address us correctly and feel comfortable asking questions if they wish to do so. It is also key to stay positive when delivering the training session and make learners feel involved and comfortable. This enables learners to take control of their own learning. Things that are also essential to making learners feel comfortable in the environment they are in are the conditions in which the session is being delivered. This could be things such as the temperature of the room, any noise that could distract and any visual distractions that could arise. Even if some of these are beyond your control then it is still important to meet the minimum requirements so that effective learning can take place.
The feedback received for the training session overall was good. Learners felt that they were able to take away knowledge of certain elements of TUPE they had not previously known about before. However it is important to know that in that timeframe we could not cover all aspects of the subject. Learners felt that the objectives of the session were clearly explained and this was done by ensuring that they were clearly presented at the beginning of the presentation. We then referred back to these towards the end of the session with some

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Core Task 1 Marketing Plan

... | | |CIM No: | | | |3,270 | |Word Count | | |Excl. tables, | | |Appendices | | |Version: |1.0 | |Date: |December 2007 | TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Executive Summary 3 2 Mission Statement & Corporate Objectives 4 2.1 Mission 4 2.2 Corporate Objectives through 2007-08 4 3 Situation Analysis 5 3.1 Marketing Audit 5 3.1.1 External Macro-environment 5 3.1.2 Market, Customer, Competitor 6 3.1.3 Five Forces 6 3.1.4 Internal Environmental Issues 6 3.2 Marketing Objectives 7 4 Marketing Strategy & Marketing Mix Plans 8 4.1 Strategy formulation 8 4.1.1 Competitive Advantage 8 4.1.2 PLC/Ansoff 8 4.1.3 STP 8 5 Marketing Mix Plan 10 5.1 Service Mix 10 5.2 Price 10 5.3 Distribution 10 5.4 Promotion 11 5.5 People 11 5.6 Process 11 5.7 Physical Evidence 11 6 Improvements to Service Quality 13 6.1 Reasons for...

Words: 4171 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Personality Influence Job Satisfaction

...The Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives Oliver P. John and Sanjay Srivastava University of California at Berkeley Running head: Big Five Trait Taxonomy Final draft: March 5, 1999 Author's Address: Oliver P. John Department of Psychology University of California, MC 1650 Berkeley, CA 94720-1650 W: (510) 642-2178; H: 540-7159; Fax: 643-9334 Email: ojohn@socrates.berkeley.edu; sanjays@socrates.berkeley.edu To appear in L. Pervin and O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford (in press). 2 Taxonomy is always a contentious issue because the world does not come to us in neat little packages (S. J. Gould, 1981, p. 158). Personality has been conceptualized from a variety of theoretical perspectives, and at various levels of abstraction or breadth (John, Hampson, & Goldberg, 1991; McAdams, 1995). Each of these levels has made unique contributions to our understanding of individual differences in behavior and experience. However, the number of personality traits, and scales designed to measure them, escalated without an end in sight (Goldberg, 1971). Researchers, as well as practitioners in the field of personality assessment, were faced with a bewildering array of personality scales from which to choose, with little guidance and no overall rationale at hand. What made matters worse was that scales with the same name often measure concepts that are not the same, and scales with different...

Words: 24630 - Pages: 99