Free Essay

Refusal Clauses

In: Other Topics

Submitted By cbs163
Words 725
Pages 3
Carina Smith
Rosemont College
Week 6 paper

Abstract

The broad structure of this case is whether a pharmacist has the right to refuse a prescription if the pharmacist is morally opposed to a possible outcome of the use of that prescription or whether a patient has the right to have that prescription filled without the pharmacist opinion of whether the use of that medication is either ethical or moral.

In America we have access to all types of things that others don’t have access to; For instance, Twitter, Facebook, weed delivery services, supermarkets bigger than the Comcast building. But yet, when a women get prescribe legitimate medication from her doctor for either HIV, miscarriage or birth control, she is being denied by her pharmacist. Pharmacist are now refusing to dispense emergency contraception based on their own religious or moral beliefs overriding women's decisions about their bodies, lives and also denying referrals from physicians.
In this case it shows no right or wrong with the decision the pharmacist choose to take. A pharmacy can refuse to fill your prescription because of refusal clauses. These laws allow people and corporations to put their beliefs before your needs. Some refusal clauses even let people and companies deny you information on where else you can get the services they refuse to provide (prochoiceamerica.com).
As the customer I will feel angered and stressed, because you would think that you’ll be able to get a prescription filled that your doctor wrote out for you with no problems. But, when it comes to really understanding the reasons for some pharmacist to deny prescription, is a good reason to have. For example, if a patient has multiple doctors for many different ailments and they all prescribe drugs that, combined, could cause significant harm to the patient, the pharmacy should have the power to not fill prescription. But, in that sense, it’s for the sake of aiding the patient, preventing harm to them, not fulfilling some judgmental opinion on behalf of the pharmacist.
Therefore, Regardless of how the ethical issue should be resolved, it is clear that both sides of the issue are meritorious. A patient has a legitimate interest in having a prescription filled and that a pharmacist has a legitimate interest in not providing medication that he finds ethically offensive. There are several solutions that can protect one or both of those interests. The first option is for the state licensing board to require pharmacists to fill prescriptions without regard to their moral or ethical objections. The second option is for the state to permit pharmacists to refuse to fill prescriptions, but to allow employers to compel pharmacists to fill all prescriptions as a condition of employment.
So should a pharmacists be allowed to deny prescriptions on grounds of Conscience? An individual who objects on grounds of conscience or religious belief to entertain a certain act has a considerable amount of rights. To force someone to perform an act against his/her religion would be a violation of their human rights. In which this case the young lady would be protected under U.S. Law. Many cases customers can simply seek out an alternate care provider. However in this cases, no alternate is available. Some individuals may be unable to access an alternate due to personal limitations such as transportation, insurance coverage, finances, or lack of knowledge about where and how to access alternate care.
So should a pharmacist be allowed to force their own moral beliefs upon an individual? If it’s going to protect the individual and not cause any harm than yes. As a pharmacist they have no prior knowledge of your medical history. They can only make assumptions based on a prescription.
It is the job of the pharmacist to give information to clients and not withhold said information.
Have the responsibility to inform the consumer where they can purchase the medication. Doctors and Nurses are allowed to refrain or refuse to a procedures that conflict with their morals. Why shouldn't pharmacist be allowed to refuse prescriptions?
As the pharmacist I would have referred the customer to another pharmacy that will accept her prescription. By referring the patient to another pharmacy, the pharmacist will be passively participating in the activity they refused to actively assist.

References http://www.drugtopics.com http://www.hpso.com
http://www.nwlc.org

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Baby Thesis System Analysis and Development

...com/aboutus/terms- and- conditions.html 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS AND BAGGAGE Clause 1 - Definitions In these General Conditions, capitalized terms, expressions and abbreviations have the meanings set out for them in Schedule 1. Clause 2 - Interpretations 2.1 Unless otherwise stated in this General Conditions: • plural concepts shall include the singular and vice versa; • a reference to one gender shall be deemed to include a reference to any other gender; • any document, excluding this General Conditions, shall include any amendment to or revision of that document and any replacement for it; • a Clause or a Schedule is a reference to a clause of or a schedule to this General Conditions; • any Regulation shall include any amendment to that Regulation and any replacement for it; • "includes," "including," "include" or similar terms shall not be construed as limiting and shall mean "including, without limitation."; and • in the event of a conflict between the provisions of any Regulation and the provisions of this General Conditions, then the provisions of the Regulation shall prevail. 2.2 Headings to Clauses in this General Conditions, its Schedules and the Regulations are for convenience only and are not intended to affect their meaning. Clause 3 - Applicability 3.1 General Except as otherwise provided in this Clause 3, this General Conditions apply only on flights or flight Sectors where the name of the Airline or its......

Words: 7794 - Pages: 32

Premium Essay

Chapter 18 Question 3 and Chapter 23 Question 1 and 5 of the Legal Environment of Business in the Information Age

...what are some things you could do to avoid having states where these customers live require you to collect sales tax? Some of the things you could do to avoid having to pay taxes to states where the customers live is by not receiving the benefits from that state. You could also use mail-order catalog sales. If the business only sends the catalog to residents of a particular state that is not sufficient enough to subject the company to the jurisdiction of that state and therefore they don’t have to pay the sales tax of that state. The EU has recently changed its trade laws and now refuses, among member nations, to enforce choice of forum clauses when a consumer is a purchaser. How might this refusal to enforce choice of forum clauses impact websites within the EU? Within the EU, refusal to enforce choice of forum clauses will impact the websites by making them have to abide by the Brussels I regulation. This regulation states that the seller will have to appear in courts that are located in consumers’ jurisdiction. Under the Brussels I regulation, sellers will have to abide by the laws of the 15 member nation of the EU. They now will have 15 separate European markets (jurisdictions), with different rules for each....

Words: 390 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Apple

...repudiation, there must be a clear, absolute, unequivocal refusal to perform the contract according to its terms. * When they say they’re not gonna do what they were gonna do and they’re not gonna get it done on the day they said. * * A refusal to perform a contract that is made before performance is required unless the other party to the contract does an act or makes a concession that is not required by the contract is an anticipatory repudiation of the contract. * A party making an anticipatory repudiation may retract or take back the repudiation if the other party has not changed position in reliance on the repudiation. * However, if the other party has changed position, the party making the anticipatory repudiation cannot retract it. Anticipatory repudiation by conduct: * The anticipatory repudiation may be expressed by conduct that makes it impossible for the repudiating party to perform subsequently. Waiver of Breach: * The breach of a contract may have no importance because the other party to the contract waives the breach. Waiver – release or relinquishment of a known right or objection. Existence of waiver * A party may express or declare that the breach of a contract is waived. Scope of the waiver * The waiver of a breach of contract extends only to the matter waived. It does not show any intent to ignore other provisions of the contract. Antimodification clause * Modern contracts commonly specify that......

Words: 1060 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Spiderman Contract Case

...because the agreement contains a clause where approval could be withheld for legitimate reasons. In Hello’s defense, Taymor’s behavior stated in the paragraph 8 of the Counterclaims would be reasonable enough to withhold her approval for changes. However, the Collaborator Agreement does deal with the issue of Taymor’s full and final creative control. Taymor’s main argument would be from her ability to draw evidence of intent and promises from emails and other contracts to show the court she was authorized full creative control. The Collaborator Agreement does not incorporate the parol evidence rule, which is applied in a precedent case, Slivinksy v. Wilkins, 221 Cal.App.3d 799 (199). In the case, the court found Sandra Slivinksy’s employment termination legal despite promises before signing that her employment would be indefinite. This was based on a clause stating that there were no express or implied agreements of the employment time, a demonstration that no other agreement would matter. Unlike Slivinsky’s employment contract, Taymor’s Collaborator Agreement lacks a clause that states it is the final agreement. As a result, she can draw from the multiple promises by others and the Berger Agreement, which gave her intent to act and expect full creative control over the musical’s creative decisions. Hello Entertainment’s Argument Hello Entertainment poses counter-claims that Taymor’s refusal to collaborate is a breach of the contract. This refusal to work with the......

Words: 949 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Gideon V. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963

...his conviction and sentence on the ground that the trial judge’s refusal to appoint counsel violated Gideon’s constitutional rights. The Florida Supreme Court denied Gideon’s petition. Gideon next filed a handwritten petition in the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court agreed to hear the case to resolve the question of whether the right to counsel guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution applies to defendants in state court. Issue: A prior decision of the Court’s, Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1942), held that the refusal to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant charged with a felony in state court did not necessarily violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court granted Gideon’s petition for a writ of certiorari – that is, agreed to hear Gideon’s case and review the decision of the lower court – in order to determine whether Betts should be reconsidered. Rule: 1. This case overruled Betts and held that the right of an indigent defendant to appointed counsel is a fundamental right, essential to a fair trial. Failure to provide an indigent defendant with an attorney is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution (“Constitution”) 2. Application: The Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In overturning Betts, Justice......

Words: 484 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Cdcs

...issued by Bank W in Seoul (”Issuing Bank”), all of which were issued on behalf of the same applicant in favour of the same beneficiary, for the same goods, i.e. petroleum products and contained similar terms and conditions including the following: • Full set of 3/3 original bill of lading made out or endorsed to the order of the Issuing Bank marked freight payable as per charter party; • Charter party bill of lading and undated Charter party Contract thereon is acceptable; • Field 44B indicated ”Any port(s) in South Korea” as the port of discharge; • The credits do not require the credit number to be indicated on the bill of lading. The B/Ls presented, in each case, were a full set of original ”Tanker Bill of Lading” containing the clause ”PURSUANT AND SUBJECT TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS, LIBERTIES AND EXCEPTIONS AS PER VOYAGE CHARTER PARTY INDICATED HEREUNDER” and being marked ”FREIGHT PAYABLE AS PER CHARTER PARTY”. Each B/L indicated ”ANY PORT(S) IN SOUTH KOREA” as the discharging port. All B/Ls were endorsed to the order of the Issuing Bank. …/… The Confirming Bank negotiated the documents under each of the credits after finding them to be in compliance with the terms and conditions of the credits. All the documents were remitted to the Issuing Bank as per instructions in the credits. The Issuing Bank refused the documents presented under each of the credits citing the following discrepancies with respect to all credits • L/C number is not indicated on BL; •......

Words: 1820 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Careful What You Sign

...you Sign By Ramon Corona Argosy University Automatic renewal clauses can be very tricky and if not made aware of they can cause unwanted financial hardships. According to uslegal.com automatic renewal clause is defined as a clause that allows an agreement to continue for a defined period if the existing agreement isn't renegotiated within a specified time measured from the expiration of the current contract. This happens all too often with contractual agreements as customers agree to terms of the contract for a designated amount of time only to find that with the contract there is an automatic renewal clause that binds them for a continuous amount of time. In most instances the contract may state that the costumer may opt out of the contract and the renewal clause within a specific time period, which is often within the first 60-90 days after signing the contract. In the scenario which involves Letisha and her purchase of goods from Sudson, she purchased the goods under contract which involved her keeping the goods for a period of 5 years. After the 5 years Letisha gave the Sudson Company a courtesy call to advise them that she would no longer be using their goods. The operator responder with the refusal to terminate the contract as Letisha did not notify the company within 90 days to terminate the contract as per the contract and the automatic renewal clause. In this bilateral contract in which both parties make promises to live up to......

Words: 647 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Assignment 2

...are some things you could do to avoid having states where these customers live require you to collect sales tax? Certain of the things you could do to evade having to pay taxes to states where the consumers live are by not getting the benefits from that state. You could also use mail-order catalog sales.   If the business only sends the catalog to residents of a particular state that is not sufficient enough to subject the company to the authority of that state and therefore they don’t have to pay the sales tax of that state.    5. The EU has recently changed its trade laws and now refuses, among member nations, to enforce choice of forum clauses when a consumer is a purchaser. How might this refusal to enforce choice of forum clauses impact websites within the EU? Within the EU, denial to enforce choice of environment clauses will impact the websites by formulating them have to abide by the Brussels I guidelines....

Words: 345 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Assignment

...time and place under the circumstances 2. BREACH OF CONTRACT Can be either: • failure to perform (improper or incomplete performance) or • refusal to perform, also called “repudiation” And can involve either warranties or conditions If A fails to perform a Condition B has a choice: EITHER treat contract as ended in which case B is excused from performing and B can sue B for damages OR treat contract as still binding (usually by accepting a benefit) in which case B must still perform but B can sue A for cost of any deficiency Note, this means that a breach of condition that is accepted by B is treated like breach of warranty. If A Fails to perform a Warranty B has NO choice. B must still perform, But B can still sue A for damages NOTE 1: How do you distinguish a condition from a warranty? Some say “One person’s warranty is another person’s condition.” Whether a term in a contract is a warranty or a condition may depend on the circumstances: E.g.: What the parties agreed between themselves Or accepted practice in the trade or industry But the “Three P’s” are always considered to be conditions NOTE 2: What is the effect of Exemption Clauses? Definition: clauses that attempt to limit liability for faulty performance These are approached with care and reluctance by courts because they are usually complex and......

Words: 1854 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Pa205

...he was not able to afford one. He was forced to act as his own counsel and was convicted. He was sentenced to five years in a state prison. Defendant was denied counsel due to Florida Law. The law stated that the only time and indigent defendant would get a counsel was if he is charged with a capital offense. Gideon filed a petition for habeas corpus attacking his conviction and sentence on the ground that the trial court’s refusal to appoint counsel denied his constitutional rights and rights guaranteed him under the Bill of Rights. The Florida State Supreme Court denied relief. Because the problem of a defendant’s constitutional right to counsel in state court continued to be source of controversy since Betts v. Brady, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to again review the issue. Issue The issue at hand is whether A prior decision of the Court’s, Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1942), held that the refusal to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant charged with a felony in state court did not necessarily violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court granted Gideon’s petition for a writ of certiorari – that is, agreed to hear Gideon’s case and review the decision of the lower court – in order to determine whether Betts should be reconsidered. Ruling Reversed; Betts v. Brady overturned, remanded for further action...

Words: 280 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Commercial Import & Export

...open account payment terms;  • The role of bill of lading in international trade;  • Differentiate between the documents that are documents of title to goods and those that are not.  • Letters of Credit –its origin, meaning & types.  • Role and responsibilities of the parties involved.  • Import Procedure/The process involved in a letter of credit cycle.  • Documents used in international trade.  • How to examine documents?  • Incoterms -2010  • UCPDC-600  • ISBP-681  • Export Procedure  • Financing of Export.: Pre-shipment & Post Shipment finance  • Export Incentives  • Dealing with Discrepancies  • Options Available to the Exporter When Documents are Discrepant.  • Taking up documents or issuance of a notice of refusal.  • Disputes and settlement of disputes  • Shipping Procedure and, many more. Contents of Training: Day - 1  Session – 1  • International Trade: An Overview  • International Trade Payment Methods:  --Cash in advance; Open account; Collection; Documentary Credit (also known as Letter of Credit) • International Sales Contract  • International Shipment of Goods  • Bill of Exchange (Draft) - (a) Sight bill of exchange & (b) Usance bill of exchange Session – 2  • Imports & Exports Under Contract Procedure  • URC (ICC Publication No.522 ): An overview  • Documentary Draft Transaction  • Handling of Documents as per URC,ICC Publication No.522 (i.e. Handling of Collection Documents)  • Handling of Bills: Clean......

Words: 800 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Labour Relations

...separately and then bring them together hoping to bridge the gaps -allowed to have a direct input into the negotiation process but cannot impose a settlement -when the union and management negotiating teams are unable to reach an agreement, and once conciliation process has been undertaken, the union may exercise its right to strike or request interest arbitration and the employer may exercise its right to lock out the bargaining unit members. -strike: the temporary refusal by bargaining unit members to continue working for the employer -strike vote: legally required in some jurisdictions, it is a vote seeking authorization from bargaining unit members to strike if necessary. A favourable vote does not mean that the strike is inevitable. -vote helps union negotiating team determine their relative strength -picketing -boycott : refusal to patronize the employer. Such action can harm the employer and develop a bias against the employer’s products that is not easily reversed. -lockout: temporary refusal of a company to continue providing work for bargaining unit employees involved in a labour dispute, which may result in closure of the establishment for a time. (to put pressure on the union to agree to the terms/conditions being offered by management) -it is illegal for a union to call a strike involving employees who do not have the right to strike because of the essential nature of their services (nurse, police) - it is illegal to call a strike......

Words: 2233 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Paris Peace Conference

...Opposition in the U.S. Senate, particularly from Republican politicians Henry Cabot Lodge and William E. Borah, together with Wilson's refusal to compromise, ensured that the United States would not ratify the Covenant." In other words it was created BECAUSE of WW1, to premote the peice and stop anything like that from happening again. "Germany expected a treaty based on these fourteen points. However, negotiations between the 'big four' Lloyd George of England, Orlando of Italy, Clemenceau of France and Woodrow Wilson of America did not go smoothly. Wilson believed that his fourteen points was the only way to secure everlasting peace. The French however, wanted the defeated nations to be punished severely and believed Wilson's plan too lenient. Privately Lloyd George sided with Wilson although he was concerned about the threat from Communism, however, the British public, like Clemenceau, wanted Germany punished severely. Lloyd George knew that if he sided with Wilson he would lose the next election...." General Clauses of the treaty. The establishment of the League of Nations War Guilt clause - Germany to accept blame for starting the war. Financial Clauses Reparations - Germany was to pay for the damage caused by the war. The figure of £6,600 million was set some time after the signing of the treaty. Military Clauses Army - was to be reduced to 100,000 men and no tanks were allowed Navy - Germany was only allowed 6 ships and no submarines......

Words: 664 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Paper

...not assume that jurisdiction based on the seizure of the defendant's property in the state satisfies the requirements of due process. In any situation involving a defendant NOT served in the state, Shoe must be satisfied. http://www.kentlaw.edu/cyberlaw/docs/rfc/usview.html The key to knowing when to collect sales tax from your customers can be boiled down to one word “Nexus”, but the true way for states to stop collecting Tax while ecommerce in the internet is to referred to the Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/235/text Q. The EU has recently changed its trade laws and now refuses, among member nations, to enforce choice of forum clauses when a consumer is a purchaser. How might this refusal to enforce choice of forum clauses impact websites within the EU? A....

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Freedom of Conscience Amendment

...discrimination laws known as the “Freedom of Conscience Amendment.” According to Denlinger, this new section in Article I of the Pennsylvania Constitution “Will prohibit government from punishing an individual or entity if the individual or entity makes hiring or other employment decisions, or provides services, accommodations (including housing accommodations), advantages, facilities, goods or privileges based on sincerely held beliefs.” Assuming that the state legislature passed this Amendment to the state Constitution, it is necessary to determine whether or not it would survive a legal challenge to its constitutionality in the Supreme Court. After analyzing cases of precedent in the area of racial discrimination as well as the Commerce Clause in the United States Constitution, it is evident that Rep. Denlinger’s Amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution would be struck down and ruled unconstitutional. Before exploring the justifications behind ruling Rep. Denlinger’s Amendment unconstitutional, it is imperative to see how and why the Supreme Court can make a judgment on the constitutionality of laws, as well as why the challenging of this law specifically takes place in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court’s power to determine the constitutionality of a law came from the landmark ruling in the 1801 ruling in Marbury v. Madison. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall determined that the Supreme Court had this power, along with being the final arbiter of the meaning......

Words: 986 - Pages: 4