Premium Essay

Reign Of Terror Dbq Analysis

Submitted By
Words 480
Pages 2
Should people go to the extreme and provoke the rights of citizens if that meant they were protecting the country? During the French Revolution in the late 1700’s, France went to extreme measures to protect their country and called for The Reign of Terror. The Reign of Terror killed thousands of people, mainly using a guillotine, to protect their country without actual evidence of why they were an enemy or threat. The Reign of Terror was not justified because of their very extreme measures and killings, not enough or no evidence at all for the killings, and for violating the rights of the people. Under any circumstance, there is no reason a person’s rights should be violated, if they do not have enough evidence. Document A shows us the many

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Reign Of Terror Dbq Analysis

...In the Reign of Terror thousands of people were killed and arrested. The French people tried to kill the enemies within the country. Also France won a war. The Reign of Terror was somewhat justified because some good things came out of it, many people were killed, and the guillotine. The Reign of Terror was somewhat justified because some good things came out of it. An example is, since the French were killing enemies within their own country they were gaining victories outside their country like in the war against Austria and Prussia (Document B). Also in document E they mention that the Committee of Public Safety was established with the purpose to protect the citizens from the enemies within and outside of France (Document E). In addition to establishing the Committee of Public Safety the Committee of Public Safety was successful and quashed the enemies. Also the...

Words: 447 - Pages: 2