Free Essay

Religious Tolerance and Pluralism

In: Religion Topics

Submitted By treebark7
Words 1602
Pages 7
Dan Cohn-Sherbok and Langdon Gilkey are religious theorists who both propose theories of pluralist religious dialogue. Their theories turn out to be quite similar, with Cohn-Sherbok’s proposal actually fitting into one of the categories Gilkey proposes. Like many other theories of religious pluralism, their ideas tend to conflict with established religious ideas and may not be feasible for actual use in interfaith conversation. However, Gilkey finally concludes that in order to figure out a pluralist model for religious dialogue, it must first be observed in practice, rather than putting forth proposals that are conflicted in reflection. In the end, the best step towards religious pluralism is in practice, rather than in thought and reflection. Cohn-Sherbok, from the Judaic perspective, starts with the basics, with the history of Jewish inclusivism, before he turns to show how that could turn into pluralism. He explains how, before the Holocaust, Judaism has had a comparatively tolerant attitude towards other religions, while still believing that Judaism was the one true faith. They did not condemn other religions for their practices, as their prophets said that in the end of days all people would accept their God (Cohn-Sherbok, 121). After the Holocaust however, Jewish thinkers distanced themselves from Christianity (Cohn-Sherbok, 123) Unlike the exclusivist view of Christianity, Jews have a long tradition of toleration, with the belief that God’s will extends to other faiths, even while they are the chosen people (Cohn-Sherbok, 124). Even with a history of relative religious inclusivism, the shift into pluralism requires more of the faith. Cohn-Sherbok points out that the inclusivist position is not without its faults. It seems to include two conflicting convictions: the belief in God’s universal concern and the belief that divine revelation was given specifically to the Jewish people. If God’s concern is for all of humankind, the revelation of God’s Will would not have been to just one group, disregarding the rest of humanity (Cohn-Sherbok, 124). In explaining this inconsistency, Cohn-Sherbok compares liberal Jewish thinkers who saw the inherent value in other religions while believing they possessed the “fullest divine disclosure”, to scientists who previously sponsored a view in which the earth is the center of the universe (Cohn-Sherbok, 124-125).
In more recent times, however, with the increased contact between religions now impossible to ignore, these beliefs are harder to support. As the final step to pluralism, Cohn-Sherbok proposes a “Copernican revolution” in the understanding of humanity’s religious experience (Cohn-Sherbok, 125). This change would put the Divine as the centerpiece of the world’s religions, rather than Judaism. This would require a shuffling from a Judeo-centric notion of religious history to the divine-centric perspective. From this starting point, each of the world’s religions would be comprehended as each community’s response to the same Divine Reality (Cohn-Sherbok, 125). Cohn-Sherbok explains this comparing each religious tradition to a path up a mountain, all of them with the same goal of reaching the Divine, floating above the peak. Each path is different in response to cultural and symbolic variations, and at times they may intersect or run parallel to another religion. But in the end the Divine reality sought after is unattainable by these many paths, as it is the ultimate—unknowable and incomprehensible (Cohn-Sherbok, 125). “On this view there is one ultimate Reality behind all religious expressions.” (Cohn-Sherbok, 125)
This pluralist model of religious conception, Cohn-Sherbok argues, provides a better understanding of the differences between religious systems as well as a better platform from which to base interreligious dialogue (Cohn-Sherbok, 125). Rather than assuming that Judaism is the center of Divine attention, Jewish inclusivists are able to engage with members of other traditions in a conversation in which they bother share a portion of the larger truth that is not longer static. “This new pluralistic model further reflects our current understanding of the world in which no truth is viewed as unchanging.” (Cohn-Sherbok, 126) This new idea of relational truth is constantly being developed and changed by religious interaction. The importance of relational truth is that it allows for each religion to have its own version that isn’t true in the universal sense, but is true “only for those who subscribe to it.” (Cohn-Sherbok, 126)
Even so, Cohn-Sherbok’s pluralist model is far from perfect. The idea of ‘many paths up one mountain’ is contrary to the fact that the Jewish belief that they are God’s chosen people, which has always been a central feature of their religion. He answers this by saying that the belief that God has chosen a certain people is just the manifestation of the Judaic sense of superiority and their faith’s claim to the Absolute (Cohn-Sherbok, 130). Another issue is that placing God at the center of religion is not feasible for religions where there is no God or there are many Gods. How can religious dialogue be possible when there is an assumption that the other’s God reflects your own? This question goes unanswered by Cohn-Sherbok, and remains a flaw in his theory. Gilkey, much like Cohn-Sherbok, begins the description of his pluralist ideas with the explanation of how steps toward inclusivism have already been made. He points out that the only way Christianity is able to take that step towards inclusivity is because claims of Christian superiority no longer ring true. Without this realization of the loss of power, the realization of religious diversity would not be possible, let alone an interfaith dialogue (Gilkey, 37). Gilkey goes on to describe both theological and cultural changes that resulted in this change, citing the cultural shifts as more influential. He believes that this new environment has forced a new understanding of the relationships between religions, as well as a sense of religious equality, with faiths being both raised and dropped to the same level (Gilkey, 40). In a new world more oriented toward religious equality, there is now opportunity and necessity for interreligious dialogue. In interfaith dialogue, Gilkey rights, one does or must open oneself to the “presence of truth and of grace, validity of symbol and efficacy of practice” in another faith. To do this, one relativizes one’s own religious faith as well as the revelation on which it stands (Gilkey, 40). Therefore to be in dialogue is also the “effort to interpret one’s symbols as neither to exclude nor offend this other.” (Gilkey, 41) Thus begins Gilkey’s quest to find a form of religious dialogue that is accessible to both sides. After exploring various attempts, he examines two separate paths that involve attempting to find some form of universality between religions through an interpretation of symbols that is inclusive of other religions (Gilkey, 42). The first attempt, originated by Schleiermacher, is to “propose on the one hand a wide understanding of general revelation through which the truth and the grace evident in other religions (and cultures) can be theologically explicated, and on the other hand some form of universal salvation through which the efficacy of these other religious ways can be affirmed.” (Gilkey, 42) This is problematic because it ends up explaining all other faiths from the basis of Christianity, because it provides the framework through which other religions are interpreted. The second theory of interreligious discourse states that there is a mystical center in each religion, which is then interpreted differently by different cultures. These interpretations lead to claims of absolutism by each tradition. As Gilkey says, “each particular religion is true and yet relative, a true revelation for that community, relative to other true revelations to other communities, and relative to the Absolute that each only partially and so somewhat distortedly manifests.” (Gilkey, 43) This theory is also problematic as it raises one aspect of religion over others, whereas the first attempt raised a particular religion above all others. Gilkey concludes that “in neither case is universality achieved, and in neither case is dialogue possible.” (Gilkey, 43) The similarities between the pluralist theories of Dan Cohn-Sherbok and Langdon Gilkey are unmistakable. The former proposes to shift from tradition as the center focus, to the Divine as the center focus. This theory fits into the category of Gilkey’s first theory, where the framework of one religion is used to judge others, and is problematic because a certain religion (Christianity) is raised above others. Gilkey’s second theory involves judging all religions through the mystical essence at the center of each religion, which raises a certain aspect of each religion above the others, which is also problematic. These theories are flawed, and yet, there is still a need for interreligious dialogue. After uncovering the issues with his theories Gilkey ponders how there seems to be no “consistent theological way to relativize and yet to assert our own symbols,” even though it is required for dialogue (Gilkey, 46). In theory, it seems impossible, but in practice, Gilkey finds, it happens anyway. He concludes, “What to reflection is a contradiction, to praxis is a workable dialectic, a momentary but creative paradox.” (Gilkey, 47) While the workings of pluralistic theory are conflicted in reflection, in practice, they are possible and workable in facilitating interreligious dialogue. It is this thought that bring his thoughts to the forefront of the pluralistic theories discussed here. Gilkey asserts that through reflection, the answers to creating a pluralistic environment are not to be found. Instead, they must be practiced first, used and embodied in interfaith conversation. It is there that the model for pluralist dialogue is to be discovered: not through theorizing, but through practice.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Ethnic Studies

...Name: Course: Institution: Date: Ethnic Studies. Humans have since time immemorial always had a deeply rooted psychological and social need to belong or identify with a community or group that provides interaction with fellow humans, protection from external dangers and gives each member a sense of belonging. Ethnicity can be defined as a group of people who see themselves as unique or distinct from others due to imagined or real mutual history, values and traditions. These things set them apart or distinguish them from their neighbouring ethnicities. Ethnicity also entails the sharing of specific ethnic traits, backgrounds, associations, allegiances or affiliations. There are therefore innumerable ethnicities all over the world which are composed of groups of people bound together by a common factor among them all, which could be racial, cultural, religion, tribal, national, ideological or linguistic. With so many differences between the various ethnicities in their cultures, values, traditions and beliefs, conflict between them is ultimately inevitable. Ethnic groups are almost always never socially homogenous nor are they ever united politically. (Cornell, 39) Several divisive factors are always present within such groups e.g. differences in ideology, social status, class, and religion. When differences between ethnicities fail to spark conflict among them, a particularly dominant ethnicity may attempt to establish hegemony in an area. When the minority ethnicities get......

Words: 1682 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...One of the most influential teachers and philosophers of religious beliefs in the twentieth century addresses the ideas of pluralism. John Hick, (1922-2012) wrote several books and articles concerning the Christian worldviews and ideas on Christian doctrines. Hick uses a platform of cultural and geographical ideas, as well as, the “Christian experience,” to launch his theories of pluralism. At a young age, (18) it is believed that Hick underwent a strong religious experience that may have been partly the blame for at least some of his original thoughts on religion. Hick argues that for the ordinary believer, religious knowledge is gained by experiencing God for oneself. Religious knowledge, then, is mediated through our experience of the world, in much the same way that the rest of the know- ledge we have about the world is gained…A primary and unevidenceable act of interpretation is required which, when directed toward God, has traditionally been termed “faith.” Many more philosophical ideas developed in the 90 years of Hick’s life stemming from religious language, religious epistemology, the problem of evil, Christology, and of course, religious pluralism. As pluralistic ideas have expanded throughout the world and many Universities and College campuses embrace its suggestions, Christian exclusivists find themselves in an awkward position, defending the...

Words: 1704 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Religious Diversity in America

...Leading to a dramatic change in the way in which immigration functions here in the United States, and by opening “…the borders to another wave of newcomers” (Prothero 3). Before the Immigration Act of 1965 specific ethic groups mainly from Asia, were being limited in the number of immigrants that were allowed to enter the United States. So by the Immigration Act of 1965 the doors to America were once again open for immigrants from around the world no matter what race and religious background they came from (Eck 6). Since then the mass of immigrants came mostly from the Near East, Asia and Latin America, with Latin Americans contributing to the largest group (Lippy 29). “…The revolutions of the 1960’s and thereafter radically challenged traditional sources of authority and transcendent truth; sought new foundations for personal identity…looked to the authority of individual or command experience over sacred texts…,” explains Lippy (241). America’s new religious landscape is changing traditional religious attitudes due to the big variety of different religions found today. Americans now have into account the different types of spiritual practices...

Words: 858 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

“the Contribution of Baptists in the Struggle for Religious Freedom”

...Research Paper on the “The Contribution of Baptists in the Struggle for Religious Freedom” Submitted to Dr. Jason J. Graffagnino, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the completion of CHHI 665 – B04 History of Baptists by Elizabeth Linz Barthelemy February 1, 2015   Contents Introduction 1 The Baptist Origin 2 The separatists/puritans 2-3 The First Baptists Believers 4-5 The American Baptist Contribution to “religious liberty ideal”...............................................6 Rhode Island, Plymouth, and Pennsylvania Colonies......................................................7-8 The South Colonies and Their Struggle for “Religious Liberty” 9-11 Conclusion 12 Bibliography.............................................................................................................................13-15 Introduction “Religious Liberty” is a good and perfect gift from above. Contrary to populace belief “the separation of church and state,” did not originate with the ACLU but for the most part, it originated with the first British Baptists that arrived in Colonial America they were defenders of true “religious liberty.” Moreover, the distinction between religious liberty and tolerance of religion is significant. “Religious liberty” is a right of every men, however, tolerance is a concession coupled with an understand that “that......

Words: 4302 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

What Is Democracy?

...In short, democracy is the institutionalization of freedom. The description of democracy could take up more than 10 more pages, but to simplify this, democracy is basically a system which includes: people who have sovereignty, a government based upon consent of the governed, rulership of the majority, however serving to protect the rights of minorities--whether ethnic, religious, or political, or simply the losers in the debate over a piece of controversial legislation, guarantee of basic human rights for all, free and fair elections, equality before law, constitutional limits on the power of government, social, economic, and political pluralism, and values of tolerance, pragmatism, cooperation, and compromise. Although experiencing minor improvements in terms of democracy, progression of liberty for racial minorities, improvement in voting conditions, betterment in the equal distribution of town offices according to financial status of the people, Wethersflield didn´t illustrate major progression from the 1750´s to the 1780´s, with the presence of unequal distribution of land and property, and lack of religious...

Words: 266 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Politics of Cultural Pluralism and Ethnic Conflict

...This chapter focuses on various incidents of politics surrounding cultural pluralism and ethnic conflict that have occurred in least developed countries. (LDCs) Cultural pluralism refers to ethnic diversity. It’s defined as a condition in which many cultures co-exist within a society and maintain their cultural differences. It can also be called multiculturalism. Cultural pluralism seeks to overcome racism, sexism, and other forms of discrimination. Cultural pluralism has been closely linked to the growth of the middle class and the emergence of politicians who articulated nationalist or other ethnic aspirations while mobilizing workers and peasants behind that ideal. The fear of and hostility toward other ethnic groups are far older and often more entrenched than modern principles of tolerance or equality under the law. No matter how we may wish for it otherwise, we did not leave violence against outsiders behind us as our nations became modern and democratic. Ethnic minorities have been victimized for hundreds of years. One needs only look to the nineteenth-century frontier wars between White settlers and Native Americans in the United States and Chile. Ethnic Conflict Incidents In the early years of the twenty-first century (2000s), like the first decades of the twentieth century (1900s), much of the Third World suffered from ethnic, racial, and religious tensions periodically punctuated by outbreaks of brutality and carnage. When progress was made in......

Words: 1041 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Personal Worldview Inventory

...exploratory component of religion (Borg, 2013). There are some who will say that spirituality is meditation, being in tune with nature or talking to spirits, others will say that spirituality is being linked with something greater than them. This often involves seeking for the meaning of life. It can also be said that true spirituality comes from the Holy Spirit of God. As a result the person experiences emotions such as: love; joy; peace; kindness; goodness; faithfulness; gentleness and self-control (Galatians 5: 22-23). The importance of spirituality is that it shows people that there is more out there than our life on earth. Sociological Perspectives The spiritual and religious world has changed in recent years. Fewer people go to church and more consider themselves to be spiritual rather than religious (Lorimer, 2014). Spirituality can be linked with thoughts and emotions such as: love and compassion; forgiveness and...

Words: 1724 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Phi 107 Cyu 3

...should be at least one half of one page in length and utilize APA format. 1. What is the difference between a moral judgment and an aesthetic judgment? · The difference between moral judgment and an aesthetic judgment is that moral judgment determines what is considered right or wrong based on one’s feelings, which is influenced mainly by religious beliefs and upbringing. Aesthetic judgment, on the other hand, judges the beauty and status of objects. 2. Define cultural relativism. · Cultural relativism is a theory that knowledge is related to the limited nature of mind and conditions of knowing. It focuses on what is considered right or wrong as judged by different cultures, and also focuses on the differences involving social mores, customs, religions, practices, moral codes, traditions, and attitudes from one culture to another. 3. Describe the problems with cultural relativism. In light of its problems, are there any valuable insights the theory brings to moral theorizing? · One problem with cultural relativism is that it may support intolerance for one’s culture, even though it is thought of being able to teach tolerance for other cultures. However, in light of its problems, cultural relativism can teach having respect for cultural values. 4. What is a moral saint? · A moral saint is defined as a person who is always, or almost always acting to improve the well-beings of others and society. They seek to...

Words: 494 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Typologies in Religious Organisations

...Assess the usefulness of typologies in our understanding of religious organisations (33 marks) Religions are based upon very heterogenic principles and are structured in different ways, making them different of each other and therefore proving that they are not universal as some sociologists argue. Typologies within religious organisations have helped as to define religions and prove that they are based on religious pluralism and that they can be era-dependent, or in other ways can become outdated. Troeltsch was the first sociologist to divide religions into three different typologies; churches, sects and denominations, with very different characteristics and objectives. Troeltsch proved that some aspects of religions can be very different, like the background of members, the relationship to society or the tolerance towards other faiths and based upon this principles he divided each religion into one of his tree basic typologies. Troeltsch defines churches as large organisations with a universal appeal and defines Christianity and Islam as universalistic and as the main churches with a very close relationship with the state. Churches can have as mentioned a very close relationship with the state and the government, such as the Church of England, which has `monopolised´ the demands of the British society by becoming the predominant religion in the country. The Church of England has a very close relationship with the government, but also with the monarchy and therefore......

Words: 1157 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Final Project Eth/125

...Final Project ETH/125 October 16, 2013 Final Project • What information about diversity in the United States has helped you better understand or relate to others in ways that you may not have in the past? During this class I found it interesting that I was noticing interracial couples more often. While I do not have a prejudice against this, this class opened my eyes to what is really out in the world. While I am very happy to see this I also know that as long as society chooses to label people and hold stereotypes as truths there will always be more to accomplish with regards to discrimination and prejudice. Learning about diversity also helped me to recognize discrimination and prejudice. It is our diversity that makes the United States such a great county. We need to protect this diversity and fight against discrimination and prejudice. I speak up now because of learning about how this country was founded on diversity. I wish to change the mentality of people as much as I can so they too can understand the diversity of the United States. • Have you learned something new about your own racial, ethnic, or cultural history? While I view myself as an American, I did learn about who I am. I was especially interested in my mother’s ancestry. I had a chance to talk to my mother about this. While much of my Great Grandfather’s history is lost we do know that he was married to a Alkonkin Indian Squaw. My mother an I have decided to do more research on her......

Words: 2258 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Ensuring Message Recieved as Intended

...Unit 5 Intercultural Communication Overview. This unit focuses on the role of communication in the relationships of peoples and groups with different cultural, ethnic, religious or social backgrounds. It looks at both the cultural barriers to effective communication as well as to various ways those barriers can be overcome. This unit also addresses the concept of dialogue as the use of communication to achieve harmony, mutual understanding and respect among peoples and groups. Learning Outcomes: Students who complete Unit 5 will be able to: explain the role of ethnocentrism in intercultural communication discuss guidelines for effective intercultural and interreligious communication compare Arabic and English communication patterns demonstrate intercultural aspects of inter-religious communication Key Concepts for Unit 5 Definition and conceptualization of intercultural communication and overview of guidelines Overview of ethnocentrism and prejudice in communication Definition and conceptualization of dialogue as a model of communication ► Intercultural Communication Nations and people of the world are increasingly interconnected and mutually interdependent. Globally, most cities and countries are becoming more diverse internally, with citizens and residents of varying races, religions, ethnicities and national backgrounds. Meanwhile, greater the risk is associated with economic or political aloofness and social isolation. All of these social forces are fostering......

Words: 4648 - Pages: 19

Free Essay

To What Extent Is Their Tension Between Multiculturalism and Liberalism

...To what extent are there tensions between multiculturalism and liberalism? It initially appears that multiculturalism and liberalism are highly similar ideologies, championing the rights of minorities. Multiculturalism itself was inspired by liberalism due to such ideas. In addition to this, similarities exist in the multiculturalist and liberal support of principles such as equality, justice and pluralism. However, tensions between the ideologies exist, including the tension between the classical liberal promotion of the rights of the individual and the multiculturalist rights of a culture or ethnic group and the argument over essentialism and the nature of multiculturalism. Despite both multiculturalism and liberalism promoting the rights of minority groups and pluralist societies, tensions lie over the focus of this promotion. Classical liberals such as John Stuart Mill stress the importance of the individual, promoting the rights of the rights and sovereignty of all individuals, and therefore of ethnic minorities; “over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign”. On the other hand, multiculturalists promote the rights of cultures and ethnic groups, assuming that minorities adopt the will of their cultural community over individual self-centredness. Liberals argue that this threatens genuine liberty as cultures can continue to oppress individuals, evidenced in the issues such as forced marriages and the wearing of the burka. As Tariq Modood......

Words: 706 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Cultural Diversity

...Final Project Kathleen Culbreth ETH/125 August 11, 2013 Kathryn Grant * * When you are able to see how other cultures live and interact, you learn that everyone is different. This knowledge has helped me to realize that the differences between cultures can be a significant factor in our lives. What I have learned in this course has helped me learn how diversity can promote more tolerance which in turn helps us to accept other cultures and their specific way of life. The point I am trying to make is that everyone is different because of the culture that they were raised in and that the differences can be helpful in strengthening the society in which we all live. It allows us to learn a new way of life which helps us grow closer to becoming a united society. If we accept and embrace the differences, we can no longer be blind to the reality of life and what is going on around us. I believe that if we use what we learn, it can increase a deeper tolerance which in turn should help decrease racism, prejudice and discrimination. The most important thing we need to do is to stop grouping people. When we place people into a certain group, this causes us to be divided. As long as we remain a nation divided, we will continue to see attacks by one group on another group instead of the solidarity that a united nation can bring. * * Although my race is Caucasian, my ethnicity is Irish/German/Polish. I could not find any information as to my ethnicity so I......

Words: 2329 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

The Clash of Civilizations and Radicalism

...THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS AND RADICALISM Dr. M. LAL GOEL Also known as Dr. Madan Lal Goel University of West Florida Abstract. The notion of a clash of civilizations has gained notoriety since the terrorist attack on WTC on 9/11/2001. Professor Samuel P. Huntington has popularized the view that the coming global conflict will be among major civilizations, not among different political ideologies. He identifies eight major civilizations: the Western (Europe and North America), Slavic (Russia and Eastern Europe), Islamic, Confucian, Hindu, Japanese, Latin American, and the African. Of particular focus in the present paper is the threat to civilization from radical Islam. Three factors that foment radicalism are described: the Islamic theology of exclusiveness, the nostalgic memory of a Muslim empire that lasted nearly 1,000 years, and the consequences of oil boom in the Middle East. Population estimates for different civilizations are provided at the end. Introduction The theory of a clash of civilizations has been with us for some time. British historian Arnold Toynbee used the term in a series of lectures he delivered in 1953. The Middle East specialist Bernard Lewis wrote in 1990 that the Muslim rage against the West is “no less than a clash of civilizations” (Lewis, 1990, p 60). Samuel P. Huntington, a Harvard University political science professor, has given new currency to the notion of a clash of civilizations. His 1993 article in......

Words: 3926 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Final Project Eth 125

...William Rigney ETH 125 8/29/2013 Final Project Information about diversity in the United States that has helped me to better understand and relate to others in the past and today would be the events of 9/11. While I was serving in the Navy, we were assigned to escort and protect oil tankers in the Persian Gulf, ensuring safe passage from attacks by Iraqi forces. At the time, I did not look at Saddam Hussein as a radical Muslim, just as a dictator who was dead set on ruling his people and making them submit. After the attacks on the Twin Towers, I joined with other Americans, calling for a war on terrorism and the Muslims. I researched the Koran to see what all the hoopla was about and discovered that there are two acceptable versions, one that calls for a Jihad (holy war), and one that teaches peace among all people. I found that only a handful of Muslims are radical and believe in the Holy War, and that most want to live in peace with others. By learning this about the Muslims, I also learned that many whites in America are still biased toward other races and ethnicities. While some embrace the diversity on our country, there are still those that look down unapprovingly at other races. While I am proud of who I am, and my race, there are those that still embarrass me. According to projections by the U.S. Census Bureau, non-Hispanic whites could be a minority by 2043, due in part to the doubling of Hispanic and Asian populations. Races that are considered......

Words: 1770 - Pages: 8