Premium Essay

Research and Methods for Criminal Jsutice

In: Other Topics

Submitted By carlaholt
Words 421
Pages 2
Carla Jones Unit 1 DB

Deterrence theory will help improve the criminal Justice System. People may seem to be more afraid of getting caught. For example you drive along a road every day and see a police officer there sitting maybe clocking peoples speed, the next time you travel that road you automatically slow down fear he will be there. Knowing if you get caught you will get a ticket or some sort of punishment from the officer. Therefore you obey the law. Another example is half of all state prisoners were under the influence of drugs and alcohol at the time of their offense therefore, it is unlikely that such persons are deterred by either the certainty or severity of punishment because of their temporary impaired capacity to consider pros and cons of their actions .(Christopher Mumola)

The rehabilitation theory will benefit the criminal justice system. Re offending offenders are costing tax payers about to 9.5 to 13 billion a year that could be used other places. To benefit the system we need to give them proper and adequate training after release. We need to let offenders know and make help available to them to benefit in the long run. The help of finding them work and not to just release them and say we are done good luck. We need to offer programs for the younger generation to prevent committing crimes.

Reformation will benefit the criminal justice system. To be able to offer the needs to offenders in and out of prisoners will cut down on the cost to tax payers and over crowding in prisons. We as the tax payers may need to help furnish programs to be offered according to the crime

Social incapacitation would benefit the criminal justice system if we can keep people out of the area where crime is high they are not as easy to commit the crime. The offender has no choice sometime where they live when released because they have nothing.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Cognitive Behaviour

...Purpose In his articles, Porporino (1995, 1991) examines the viability of cognitive behaviour therapy as a correctional intervention. After summarizing cognitive behaviour therapy principles, he discusses strategies for implementation, and provides research data supporting its effectiveness, including post release outcomes on the Reasoning and Rehabilitation (R & R) program. Porporino’s conclusions are subsequently compared with other researcher’s opinions and research based empirical data. Methodology Porporino criticises several programs he reviewed that claimed to be cognitive. In particular, he disregards motivational programs that lack empirical evidence of reduction of recidivism, and those programs that criticise forms of thinking without providing reasoning. Likewise, he dismisses programs that criticise current forms of thinking without providing reasoning, or adapted to corrections without adequate training or strategies for implementation. He is also critical of holistic programs that claim to address life skills, stating that they lack the systematic targeting of key factors that maintain criminal attitudes. Although in 1991, he advocated for a living skills program based on the success of the cognitive skills program. Furthermore, he dismisses cognitive programming models based on stages of morality, because they lack empirical evidence and he maintains they are not cognitive (Porporino, 1995, p.p. 2, 3, 18). Why cognitive Porporino maintains it is...

Words: 2468 - Pages: 10