Free Essay

Rhetoric

In: English and Literature

Submitted By baller22
Words 2057
Pages 9
Nicholas Hamilton
Rhetoric 20
Amy J.
February 17, 2015
The Irony in Nietzsche Friedrich Nietzsche writes in his essay “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense” about the understandings of knowledge, truth, and morality. Interestingly the translation of the original title for Nietzsche’s work might have been “On Truth and Lie in the Extramoral Sense.” This is interesting because the translated version that is given for readers is “Nonmoral”; however another possible translation could have been “Extramoral” which shows that his writing may either be something not consistent with morality, but it may also be overly moral as well. Kenneth Burke writes in his work “Four Master Tropes”, about the tropes of metaphor, metonymy, synecdoche, and irony. He provides numerous definitions of irony as well as the three temptations of irony. Nietzsche’s writing and ideas about “truth and lies” are “ironic” based on the definition and examples Burke uses as well as the standard dictionary definition of irony. This irony accomplishes incongruity with what appears to be truth and lies and what it actually is; since there is no concrete truth, this is ironic in itself.
Individuals often confuse and misuse the term ironic, but Kenneth Burke gives his opinion of what irony is. He says, “Irony arises when one tries, by the interaction of terms upon one another, to produce a development which uses all the terms…they are all voices, personalities, or positions, integrally affecting one another” (432). He focuses on how terms are manipulated and changed around in order to produce a different result. This relates to how Nietzsche describes a liar as a person who misuses conventions in speech “by means of arbitrary substitutions or even reversals of names” (81). If the individual who is a liar does not purposely harm an individual with his/her substitution of language then it would be considered ironic, since the individual knows what the truth is. The standard dictionary defines irony as “the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.” Based on these two definitions of irony from Burke and the dictionary, Nietzsche illustrates irony in his work. Burke states there are three temptations of irony and there is some relation of Nietzsche’s writing and these temptations.
Burke discusses three different types of temptations that come from irony and the first one he begins with is the temptation of relativism. He defines this temptation as, “Relativism is the constant temptation of either dialectic or drama” (433). In dialectic, the truth of opinions is discussed, and throughout Nietzsche he is in a constant discussion of what the truth is. The irony in what Nietzsche discusses is that he is trying to discover what is truth when there is no absolute truth in anything. Burke later says, “The dialectic of this participation produces a “resultant certainty” of a different quality, necessarily ironic, since it requires that all the sub certainties be considered as neither true nor false, but contributory” (433). Nietzsche goes back and forth about what is considered being honest and what is a lie. Particularly his example of who the liar is reflects the temptation of relativism. Nietzsche says, “The liar is a person who uses the valid designations, the words, in order to make something which is unreal appear to be real” (81). This relativism temptation of the liar provides a new certainty that is different from other perspectives, so it cannot be proven as true or false.
The objective is to find out what perspective is being discussed. For example, during the Holocaust, the genocide of Jewish people in Germany, the Nazis, supporters of dictator Adolf Hitler, may have viewed the killing of the Jewish population as a necessary cause because it would solve a problem affecting their people. On the other hand, the Jewish population and many onlookers from the rest of the world viewed the Holocaust as a brutal, cruel, maltreatment of the Jewish population resulting in millions of individuals murdered. Depending on the perspective of who is retelling the story essentially determines what is being told, so it doesn’t mean one person is telling the truth or lying but is relying on what their culture and beliefs have caused them to look at that event. All individuals have knowledge of from this event is other people’s interpretations and opinions, which is ironic according to Burke because in a dialectic we are trying to discover what is the truth of those opinions.
The second temptation is hypocritical superiority of irony that Burke describes is supposed to be a temptation of humility not superiority. As Burke states, “True Irony, however, irony that really does justify the attribute of “humility,” is not “superior” to the enemy” (434). First it is ironic that Burke uses the word “true” to emphasize what he really believes irony is, and this is not the only time he does this. This is interesting because the way Burke describes this irony it sounds like Nietzsche’s discussion of the liar who is ironic and the liar who is purposely harming another individual. A white lie can appear to be ironic because if someone asks, “Am I fat” and someone responds saying “No” in order to be nice, that is showing humility because they are putting the other person’s feeling first instead of their own. A question that arises from that scenario is if the question in itself “Am I fat?” is ironic based upon the fact the individual asking, actually believes he or she is fat. Like Nietzsche says, “The ‘thing in itself’ is likewise something incomprehensible to the creator of language and not in the least worth striving for” (82). This ironic scene that is set up is substantiated by both the quote from Nietzsche and Burke, highlights the irony in Nietzsche’s work does in fact accomplish the effect Burke proposes.
Burke continues with his second temptation of irony and redefines what true irony is to him. He states, “True irony, humble irony, is based upon a sense of fundamental kinship with the enemy, as one needs him, is indebted to him, is not merely outside him as an observer but contains him within, being consubstantial with him” (435). In an example to better understand what Burke is saying is pretending that this enemy is knowledge. This need for knowledge from individuals is something that affects the individual personally. No matter how much knowledge the individual receives it is only what the person accepts as truth will be the knowledge they obtain and agree with. This temptation of irony is again linked to the concepts of Nietzsche as he says, “For this pride contains within itself the most flattering estimation of knowing. Deception is the most flattering effect of such pride…” (80). Relating to the liar Nietzsche discusses, who appears to be ironic, deception in the correct circumstances that results in happiness for others demonstrates the form of humility that Burke proposes. Whether or not an individual knows the truth, putting pride aside to better the life of someone else is the ultimate humility and the second temptation of irony.
The last temptation of irony is picking favorites or simplifying the irony in order to make it easy to understand. Burke states, “Irony is sacrificed to ‘the simplification of literalness’ when this duality of role is neglected” (437). Reducing the meaning of what is being said so the reader can easily make sense of it only harms the potential use of irony in that sentence. The difference in this temptation of irony, it does not seem like Nietzsche simplifies his language for his irony or metaphors to be easily interpreted. Burke compares two sentences to stress the difference of irony being used successfully and when it is overly simplified, causing it to lose its ironic affect. The example he gives is, “slavery is ‘bad,’ and is so treated in the rhetoric of proletarian emancipation” compared to “without the slavery of antiquity, no modern socialism” (437). The difference in Nietzsche’s writing is he maintains the abstract use of language where there is no straightforward, simplified interpretation. One example of this can be pulled from anywhere in his work, but this is a good example of how he does not rely of the simplification of literalness, “We know nothing whatsoever about the essential quality of ‘honesty’; but we do know of countless individualized and consequently unequal actions which we equate by omitting the aspects in which they are unequal and which we now designate as ‘honest’ actions” (87). If Nietzsche simplified this he possibly could have said, “Although we do not have definite knowledge of how to determine the quality of honesty, there are ways that we can try to distinguish certain actions to qualify them as being honest.” In Nietzsche’s writing it appeared that this temptation of irony was not demonstrated, and some of his major points and examples in his texts also resembled the effects of irony.
There are other examples of irony in Nietzsche’s writing that produces an effect on his overall argument that correlate with the temptations of irony or the definition of irony that Burke provides for the reader. Nietzsche says “We believe that we know something about the things themselves when we speak of trees, colors, snow, and flowers; and yet we possess nothing but metaphors for things.” This is interesting because we say these things with no knowledge, only a preconceived notion of what something appears to be when the name is said. Why do individuals instantly think of a long log of wood with branches and leaves growing out of it when the word tree is used? Nietzsche goes on to say, “Truths are illusions which we have forgotten are illusions; they are metaphors that have become worn out and have been drained of sensuous force” (84). This sentence creates a sense of irony because of the sentence structure that Nietzsche uses to describe what truths are. Based on Burke’s definition he produces a development that uses all the terms in order to accomplish this meaning of truth.
Nietzsche and Burke really have something in common, which as stated earlier, how perspectives could really provide a difference in how things are viewed. Nietzsche really makes the reader think in this section of his essay that focuses on the impossibility of having multiple perspectives when he states, “If we could only perceive things now as a bird, now as a worm, now as a gnat, or if one of us saw a stimulus as red, another as blue, while a third even heard the same stimulus as a sound–then no one would speak of such regularity of nature, rather, nature would be grasped only as a creation which is subjective in the highest degree” (87). Individuals often imagine what life is like to be an animal they will more than likely have the perspective they have as a human because it is almost impossible to develop a new perspective on life like that. Even if it wasn’t an animal, people wonder what they look like in the eyes of others, but they can never truly experience that other perspective because they will continue to see themselves through the lens of their on eyes. Although individuals can watch videos of them or look in the mirror and try to guess how others perceive them, it still remains a nearly impossible task.
Throughout this essay it is discussed what is considered to be true, a lie, or a lie that is ironic. Kenneth Burke tries to determine what is true irony, and Nietzsche is in a constant debate of how people know what is truth and what is a lie. Ironically Nietzsche says there is no concrete truth; however Burke is able to give a definition to what true irony is. Based on the temptations Burke gives, his definition of irony, as well as the standard dictionary definition of irony, Nietzsche accomplishes irony in his work that is not purposeful. Not all irony is not always on purpose, and in Nietzsche writing, the intent was not to write an essay full of irony that is coherent to the effects of irony that Burke proposes.

Works Cited
Nietzsche, Friedrich. "On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense." Philosophy and Truth (1870's):
79-91. Print.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Rhetoric

...John Staine Heinrich Critical Book Review 2/13/14 LSTU 261 Rhetoric in its most simplistic form is language; more specifically rhetoric is persuasive language. Rhetoric is something that we use every day whether we know it or not, we are always using it. In Jay Heinrich’s strong argumentative book, “Thank you for Arguing,” he stresses the importance of rhetoric heavily. Heinrich argues that rhetoric is the key component to arguing and everyone can benefit from knowing how exactly to use rhetoric. His main intent is to show how rhetoric has shaped this country and how history is formed from its critical use. My view on this importance of rhetoric is at the same levels of Heinrich’s. I do believe that rhetoric is key to arguing and even beyond arguing, with getting by in the society in which we live in. I also agree with Heinrich’s idea on not arguing for a win but for a purpose, for a goal. Argument in the future tense will help bring strength to the situation itself. In the book Heinrich uses real life examples, ranging from his personal life, to television, to music, all the way through our history as a country. I noticed that Heinrich doesn’t really state the opposition of his argument, one could assume that if you do not use rhetoric effectively then you will not succeed in our society and that is it. I would also have like to see examples of rhetoric stripped down in a less complex form, for example someone using it that doesn’t really know the depth of it...

Words: 1250 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Rhetoric

...Dylan Weber Kim Priest English 101 Rhetorical Analysis During the beginning of this article, Tom Bissel has a back and forth comparison of his opinion about the video game Fallout 3, and telling his imaginary children, Kermit and Hussein, what he was doing the day that Barack Obama was elected to be our first African-American President of the United States. He tries to make an argument that even though there was a widely-known national, and even global, event that took place, he felt like playing the open world game of Fallout 3 was just more important. He goes on to say, “And so, my beloved Kermit, my dear little Hussein, at the moment America changed forever, your father was wandering an ICBM-denuded wasteland, nervously monitoring his radiation level, armed only with a baseball bat, a 10mm pistol, and six rounds of ammunition, in search of a vicious gang of mohawked marauders who were 100 percent bad news and totally had to be dealt with. Trust Daddy on this one”. This analogy of two events shows that beating a video game like Fallout 3 was just as important as watching the election of the 44th President of the United States. And while the excruciating detail of the game makes it seem like there was a lot of responsibility on his hands and he makes it sound like an assertion, it wouldn’t matter in the end, because we all know it was just a virtual world, and he missed out on reality. His anecdote was very detailed, however, and I’m sure if there was anyone who was skeptical...

Words: 1324 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Rhetoric

...The Rhetorical Situation Purpose: Demonstrate how rhetorical analysis helps us better understand why a speech or other communicative act is or is not effective. Specifically, your goal is to identify and evaluate the effectiveness of the rhetorical strategies a speaker or writer uses given his or her rhetorical situation. Audience: Your primary audience is friends and family who are unfamilar with rhetorical analysis. Your secondary audience is rhetorical scholars; they will be familiar with the basic concepts of rhetorical analysis and will thus be able to judge the strength of your analysis.  Topic: I will assemble a list of five speeches from American Rhetoric's speech bank you may choose from for your analysis. However, if you would like to use a different speech, or if you would like to use a text, video, or something else, speak with me before you begin working on your essay to receive approval.  Key Terms Understanding these terms will help you craft a strong rhetorical analysis (we will read about these concepts and/or discuss them in class): * rhetorical situation * genre * the three rhetorical appeals: logos, pathos, and ethos * organization/arrangement * identification * tone * diction * sentence structure figures of speech (e.g. metaphors, epistrophe) Writing the Analysis In a rhetorical analysis, the writer's purpose is to explain how the rhetorical strategies a rhetor (speaker/writer) uses enchance or...

Words: 489 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Theory of Rhetoric

...English 472 Spring 2007 Herrick Notes Herrick, James. A History and Theory of Rhetoric: An Introduction. 3rd edition. New York: Allyn and Bacon, 2005 Chapter Eight Enlightenment Rhetorics • late 17th – early 18th century known as the Age of Enlightenment • periods marks a transition in western thought when the questioning of the received truths of Christian tradition, the elevation of rationality over other sources of truth, looking for solutions to social problems by means of the scientific method, and perceiving the universe as governed by inviolable physical laws • 18th century marks a period in which rhetorical theory turned away from its traditional concern for the invention of arguments and toward aesthetic matters of style and good delivery • change influenced by Ramus and Descartes who moved argument and proof out of the domain of rhetoric and into the domains of logic, dialectic, and math • a rhetorical theory that distinguished the discovery of knowledge through reasoning from the communication of that knowledge • thus invention is subordinate to concerns about style, taste, delivery and the imagination • rhetoric again moved to the forefront of education but less concerned with inventing/producing public discourse and more concerned with consuming public discourse Vico on Rhetoric and Human Thought • Giambattista Vico 1668-1744 • Italian philosopher, Lawyer, historian, student of ancient Rome, rhetorician ...

Words: 1865 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Visual Rhetoric

...Eng 105-Comp 1 Proposal Essay November 1, 2013 Stimulation For my visual rhetoric I plan to use an electronic based visual due to my lack of ability to design and draw. I feel that the significance in my claim deserves a strong visual to go with it at which I would not be able to do justice with my drawing. My visual is going to use a very dark grey background to show emotion of depression or remorse. It will also shows bright colors that represent the flag of the United States as well as writing at which would define the purpose of the claim. The images in the visual argument are going to be positioned in a downward diagonal line with a larger image in the middle outlined by a black border to show importance. The smaller images give two different views one is in color as if they are watching it on the television and the other is absent of color and provides still space with a black and white photo of a famous person. The repetition although small is in the alignment and the size of the photos. The smaller photos are identical in size and our consumed by the main picture by the same amount of space. The color of the United States flag is going to convey patriotism and emotionally draw in the audience. The showing of the bold white lettering of the typography is going to show that there is a bold and strong allegiance to the United States flag. I feel that this statement will define the argument and can be presented in other ways and still convey the claim. The other...

Words: 378 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Rhetoric Analysis

...Institution Date The aim of every advertisement is to reach out to as many people as possible and relay the intended information to them. The hallmark of its effectiveness is only measurable through determination of its levels of persuasion. It is not very easy to appeal to a given mass and have the ability to change their beliefs, behaviors, intentions, motivations and attitudes. To do so, there are a number of factors, that different and distinct, that must be brought together intricately to create a complex appeal mechanism. To achieve the intended purpose within the set limits, an advertisement or campaign must employ the different modes of persuasion that are ethical strategies used for rhetorical appeal. These strategies are categorized rhetoric devices that classify the appeal that an advertisement might have on the audience. They are; pathos, logos and ethos. Pathos is an appeal on the emotions of an audience. It is responsible for eliciting sympathy and empathy from the target audience. Logos is the logical appeal that an advertisement might have on the audience. It is the aspect that deals with facts and figures. Ethos is particularly concerned with the authority the proposers of a given campaign have on the given field. The qualifications that a creator or an advertiser may have with regard to the content of their advertisement will definitely influence the audience’s ability to relate with the advert. In 2007, a UK charitable organization that offers extensive treatment...

Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Rhetoric In The Odyssey

...What is rhetoric? Some say that it is the art of persuasive speech or the art of public speaking. Webster’s dictionary dictates rhetoric as, “ the art of speaking or writing effectively”. Throughout society speaking has always played an insurmountable role in our everyday lives, even before we put a literary term to define our actions. We do not see the practice of rhetoric until the 800s BC with the appearance of Homer, who was an author of multiple epic poems. Homer is most commonly known for, “The Iliad” and “The Odyssey”, which both are compiled of multiple speeches within his poems. This allowed Homer to use rhetoric throughout his works. Rhetoric is used much more than just in works of literature. Education and government play large...

Words: 1003 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Persuasive Of Rhetoric

...I think the goal that the speaker wants to deliver is being the truth of what you are and what you actually believe. The audience should be everyone no matter you are still teenagers or you are adults. She used the comic as an example to express her feeling, her emotions. She also shared her own life story in order to get the attention of the audiences to make the topic clear, to help the audiences understand the main point, and to encourage the audiences to be what they are, be truth to the life. B. My definition of persuasive of rhetoric is how to make the topic clear, easy to    understand and some examples or some evidences to prove your words. First of all, in order to make my audiences understand what I am going to deliver, I should...

Words: 314 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Visual Rhetoric

...‘Got Milk?’ In 1993, the sales of milk are falling out as Americans switched to other drinks. The California Milk Processor Board launched the ‘Got Milk?’ campaign created by the agency Goodby Silverstein & Partners to promote to all people of all ages to drink more milk. ‘Got Milk?’ is a very influential advertising campaign that has gained over the years and continues to provide awareness for nutritional benefits of milk (Holt). The ads always use familiar faces to promote their products. The public is more likely to spend money to something they believe that they are trustworthy. An example of this ad is from Sports Illustrated magazine September 1999 issue featuring tennis stars and sisters Venus and Serena Williams. Famous for their colorful beaded braids and on-court success, these athletes have paired up off court with a milk mustache to encourage both young and adults especially those who lead active lifestyles to drink milk and get all the health benefits from it. The ethical appeal in this ad is very noticeable from the moment you look at it. “The ‘Got Milk?’ campaign is one of the most recognized and respected advertising campaigns, having earned a place in advertising history,” says milkdelivers.org. The ‘Got Milk?’ campaign ad has increased the production and consumption of milk products in California. A company that is known for its success has been around for years and still going means that their credibility is unquestionable. This may be one of the reasons...

Words: 672 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Riot Grrl Rhetoric

...The Riot Grrrls use rhetoric as the power to persuade their audience to stand up against the abuse that people face in their daily bases by connecting with them. America has always struggled with the problem of racism. However, the problem that we currently see, such as “Make America great again” Another problem that America and the rest of the world are dealing with is feminism....

Words: 1017 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Aristotle's Rhetoric Analysis

...The Rhetoric Rhetoric is the study of effective speaking and writing. (Rhetoricae, n.d.) Ideas of Rhetoric have been used for ages throughout history, but the philosopher, Aristotle was the one who discovered the three categories of the means of persuasion; ethos, pathos and logos in his work Rhetoric. (Rapp, 2002) According to Aristotle, ethos is the credibility. Using people who are familiar or already respected adds credibility to what the persuader is saying. Oftentimes companies will use celebrities to endorse their products, and this is because of ethos. Even if the product is new and the audience has no personal experiences with it, they are familiar with the celebrity, and that gives the product credibility. (Henning, 1998) The second...

Words: 285 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Rhetoric And Dialectic Analysis

...To properly display the art of persuasion Aristotle instructs us on the importance of understanding Rhetoric and Dialectic. Rhetoric, which is the performance or how you articulate your side and Dialectic, which is the argument you are trying to convey. One must make sure when disputing their thesis that they make sure to present it in a way that is alluring and worth listening to or reading. If you are trying to gain the understanding from a bunch of enraged people first you would want to look at what condition these people are in. Next you would investigate who gets these people angry, and lastly why they get pissed off. Using all this information you can properly determine the nature of rhetoric that would work best in your favor. Dialectic...

Words: 265 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Rhetoric vs Sophistry

...Stephen Mailloux’s (1995, ed) discussion of “Sophistry and Rhetorical pragmatism” (pp1-30) and West and Turner’s (2010, pp.312-327) discussion of “Rhetoric”. This essay is a review of Stephen Mailloux’s discussion of Sophistry and Rhetorical pragmatism (Mailloux, 1995) and West and Turner’s discussion of Rhetoric (West & Turner, 2010). The writings in question discuss the origins and evolution of Rhetoric, with Mailloux introduce a historical and philosophical criticism of “sophistic Rhetoric as applied in the modern American context” (for example, neopragmatism and poststructuralism), and evaluated in the rest of the book, whilst West and Turner enlighten the reader about the heurism and globalism of Aristotle’s Rhetorical theory with a focus on the discipline of public speaking. Mailloux introduces sophistic Rhetoric as founded on the pragmatic doctrine that “Man is the measure of all things: of things which are, that they are, and of things which are not, that they are not”, a phrase attributed to the Sophist Protagoras (Patrick, 2006). Others Sophists of note include Gorgias, Prodicus, Hippias and Thrasymachus – quoted in Plato’s Republic as saying “… ‘Just’ or ‘right’ means nothing but what is to the interest of the stronger party” (Plato & Lane, 2007)). West and Turner’s account of the Rhetoric show that the first teachers of Rhetoric were the "Sophists”, who were nomadic teachers of public speaking that were respected for their intellect and subsequently paid highly for their...

Words: 2288 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Visual Rhetoric Analysis

...Visual Rhetoric While this organization succeeds in many ways with it rhetoric, it fails to succeed with its visual rhetoric. Visual rhetoric is supposed to “solidify and make more concrete ideographs meanings and help the rhetor connect or affirm their ideologies” according to chapter 3 supplemental notes. However, the visual images on the website and brochures fail to do much talking at all. They are rather plain with mostly pictures of women smiling. So instead of using the images purposely and showing things they have done or accomplishments that women and women of color have achieved to help support their argument they put minimal effort into the visual rhetoric making it useless to their argument. It would be effective for them to show...

Words: 814 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Persuasion Thought Rhetoric

...that brought to mind a police mug shot. Now, when others want us to do something or want to influence our attitudes or beliefs, they may use an argument. That is, they may offer a reason why we should or shouldn’t do or believe or not believe whatever it is. They might also use threats, bribery, or even more extreme measures. But the passage quoted above illustrates a technique that is used much more frequently: the persuasive power of words, or what we have called their rhetorical force or emotive meaning—their power to express and elicit images, feelings, and emotional associations. In the next few chapters, we examine some of the most common rhetorical techniques used to affect people’s attitudes, opinions, and behavior. Rhetoric refers to the study of persuasive writing. As we use the term, it denotes a broad category of linguistic techniques people use when their primary objective is to influence beliefs and attitudes and behavior. Is Rob Reiner “a perennial political activist millionaire”? Or is he an “untiring advocate of social reform willing to spend his considerable fortune for just causes”? The different...

Words: 1106 - Pages: 5