Free Essay

Risk Management

In: Other Topics

Submitted By loper7373
Words 4978
Pages 20
Risk management in the health care in the past risk management and quality improvement job was separate in the health care organization. Even though, the job function may have been different the goal was the same. As up today they have close the gap to provide a better, and safety quality patient care.
Rationale
What is risk management any way not everyone has the same meaning. It can be define as such Risk management is a process for identifying, assessing, and prioritizing risks of different kinds. Once the risks are identified, the risk manager will create a plan to minimize or eliminate the impact of negative events. A variety of strategies is available, depending on the type of risk and the type of business.
Outline

Risk Management and Patient Safety: The Synergy and the Tension
Integrating Risk Management, Quality Management, and Patient Safety into the Organization Benchmarking in Risk Management Risk Management Strategic Planning for a Changing Health Care Delivery System Using Never Events to Reduce Risk and Advance Patient Safety Governance and Board Responsibility to Assure Safety in Health Care Organizations

1. Introduction
What is the goal or the idea behind risk management one of their focus is to reduce the financial risk other areas that may seem not important is the regulation. One of the principal issues facing health care risk management is governmental regulation. Over the last few decades, there has been a growing public demand for accountability in health care delivery. The consequent tightening of governmental regulation has led to a greater allocation of an organization's resources to regulatory compliance. Some states, including New York, enacted stringent incident reporting requirements for hospitals, requiring additional staff to investigate and prepare such reports. Additionally, competition among hospitals has also fostered a greater concern over the community's perception of quality of care. Many hospitals have had to compete harder for patients as inpatient lengths of stay decrease and more procedures are performed on an outpatient basis. Risk management in the health care

In the past risk management and quality improvement job was separate in the health care organization. Even though, the job function may have been different the goal was the same. Managing risks is the quality of services provided & the safety of patients, their careers & visitors. To manage risks to staff & subsequent risks to service quality. To manage risk of failing to meet national & local priority targets to manage risks to the efficiency of services. To manage risks to the reputation of the hospital Risk management aims to identify the major sources of risks to hospital, staff & visitors. Develop regular statistical & qualitative risk management reports Establish mechanisms to maintain & develop structures & processes for a cohesive approach to the management of clinical & non clinical risk. Conduct operational reviews of departments to identify deficiencies & potential areas for improvement. Risk management plan aims Recognition & acknowledgement of risks to patient safety & medical/health errors with a focus on improving processes & systems. Initiation of actions that reduce these risks Reporting the findings & action taken to improve processes & systems. Minimizing of individual blame or retribution for involvement in a medical health care errors. Organizational learning about medical health care errors. Sharing of acknowledgment to effect behavioral changes to minimize risk to patients. Risk management objectives
There have been a great confusion among health care professional, about the deference’s between patient safety and risk management. Patient safety is one of the most important aspect in the healthcare environment. Keeping patient safe is one the issue doctors, nurses, and every other healthcare professionals worried about every day. When it comes to errors it is one thing that make executive not been able to go sleep at night. According to the Institute of Medicine the issue of medical error is recognized as a very serious U.S. healthcare concern in terms of avoidable patient death and injury, achieving efficacious treatment, and in controlling the costs. The prevention of medical errors may seem to be a relatively simple task and with recent awareness, some improvements have been accomplished. However, the search for reasonable, acceptable, and more effective remedies and countermeasures continue with force. Attention to medical errors escalated over eight years ago with the release of a study from the Institute of Medicine (IOM), To Err is Human, which found that between 44,000 and 98,000 Americans die each year in U.S. hospitals due to preventable medical errors. Hospital errors rank between the fifth and eighth leading cause of death, killing more Americans than breast cancer, traffic accidents, or AIDS. Serious medication errors occur in the cases of 5 to 10 percent of patients admitted to hospitals. These numbers may understate the problem because they do not include preventable deaths due to medical treatments outside of hospitals. (Kohn, Corrigan & Donaldson, 1999).Now the question is who will take charge or fight to reduce the possibility that error are reduce to a bare minimum. There are not one answered everyone should be involve started with the patients, physicians, nursing, and so on. All of these people or professional are responsible to make sure patients has the safest environment possible.the health care system has the duty to implement the best practice and also save money that is the benchmarking of management.
Integrating Risk Management, Quality Management, and Patient Safety into the Organization.
An integrated framework is needed that can operate across the entire spectrum of health care from local to national, and a full range of administrative arrangements. Such a framework, integrating safety, quality and risk management, is presented in It includes the conventional medical record and ancillary information about patients, investigations and procedures, a system for logging, managing and monitoring progress when things go wrong, a data repository for collating information from all available sources, and a risk management framework underpinning both proactive and reactive responses. Central to this is a comprehensive universal classification supported by a system for eliciting, capturing, classifying, and analyzing the information needed to improve the safety and quality of health care. Safety is just one of the dimensions of the quality of health care, with access, timeliness, efficacy, efficiency, appropriateness and acceptability. Safety cannot be considered in isolation as resources spent on safety cannot be spent on other aspects of quality. Although some of the activities and information sources in are useful for some of the other aspects of quality, the discussion in this paper will be directed towards safety and things that go wrong.
We have previously identified the need for “an international patient safety reference group to align terminology, tools and classification systems and to promote the rapid dissemination of strategies that prove to be successful “Also needed is the ability to aggregate large amounts of information and compare patterns and trends over time and between individuals, organizations and countries, so that detailed pictures can be obtained of the individually rare but collectively important problems that make up the bulk of the things that go wrong. A platform from which to do this was established with the launch of the World Alliance for Patient Safety in October 2004. Two of its six early initiatives are relevant to this paper, “Developing a patient safety taxonomy” and “Reporting and learning to improve patient safety while it is essential for a classification and reporting and learning systems to be able to stand alone and function locally, we will propose here that the future lies in an integrated approach. Such an approach is shown in the salient features of this figure are referred to below in bold text. Each of these represents an important activity but, as discussion about most is beyond the scope of this paper, a few key references have been provided

Benchmarking in Risk Management
Over the last few years, increasing attention has been directed toward the problems inherent to measuring the quality of healthcare and implementing benchmarking strategies. Besides offering accreditation and certification processes, recent approaches measure the performance of healthcare institutions in order to evaluate their effectiveness, defined as the capacity to provide treatment that modifies and improves the patient’s state of health. This paper, dealing with hospital effectiveness, focuses on research methods for effectiveness analyses within a strategy comparing different healthcare institutions. The paper, after having introduced readers to the principle debates on benchmarking strategies, which depend on the perspective and type of indicators used, focuses on the methodological problems related to performing consistent benchmarking analyses. Particularly, statistical methods suitable for controlling case-mix, analyzing aggregate data, rare events, and continuous outcomes measured with error are examined. Specific challenges of benchmarking strategies, such as the risk of risk adjustment (case-mix fallacy, underreporting, and risk of comparing noncom parable hospitals), selection bias, and possible strategies for the development of consistent benchmarking analyses, are discussed. Finally, to demonstrate the feasibility of the illustrated benchmarking strategies, an application focused on determining regional benchmarks for patient satisfaction (using 2009 Lombardy Region Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire is proposed. Over the last few years, increasing attention has been directed toward the problems inherent to measuring the quality of healthcare. Accreditation and certification procedures have acted as stimulating mechanisms for the discovery of skills and technology specifically designed to improve performance. Total Quality Management and Continuous Quality Improvement are the most widespread and recent approaches to implementing and improving healthcare quality control. Besides offering accreditation and certification processes, recent approaches measure the performance of health structures in order to evaluate National Health Systems. For example, various international Agencies measure the performance of health structures in different countries, considering three main dimensions: effectiveness, efficiency, and customer satisfaction. In this perspective, performance measurement for healthcare providers, structures, or organizations is becoming increasingly important for the improvement of healthcare quality. However, the debate over which types of performance indicator are the most useful for monitoring healthcare quality remains a question of international concern. In a classic formulation, asserted that quality of care includes structure (characteristics of the resources in the healthcare system, including organization and system of care, accessibility of services, licensure, physical attributes, safety and policies procedures, viewed as the capacity to provide high quality care, process measures related to evaluating the process of care, including the management of disease, the existence of preventive care such as screening for disease, accuracy of diagnosis, the appropriateness of therapy, complications, and interpersonal aspects of care, such as service, timeliness, and coordination of care across settings and professional disciplines), and clinical outcomes. A clinical outcome is defined as the “technical result of a diagnostic procedure or specific treatment episode” “result, often long term, on the state of patient well-being, generated by the delivery of a health service”.Specifically, ongoing attention has been placed on the importance of combining structural aspects with measures of outcomes to assess the quality of care. This consideration was taken into account by the Institute of Medicine, which, in 1990, stated that “quality of care is the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge”. The objectives are to better understand the concept and its evolution in the healthcare sector, to propose an operational definition, and to describe some French and international experiences of benchmarking in the healthcare sector. To this end, we reviewed the literature on this approach's emergence in the industrial sector, its evolution, its fields of application and examples of how it has been used in the healthcare sector. Benchmarking is often thought to consist simply of comparing indicators and is not perceived in its entirety, that is, as a tool based on voluntary and active collaboration among several organizations to create a spirit of competition and to apply best practices. The key feature of benchmarking is its integration within a comprehensive and participatory policy of continuous quality improvement (CQI). Conditions for successful benchmarking focus essentially on careful preparation of the process, monitoring of the relevant indicators, staff involvement and inter organizational visits (Ettorchi-Tardy, Levif & Michel, 2012). Risk Management Strategic Planning for a Changing Health Care Delivery System

Most of us know that planning is a way of looking toward the future and deciding what the organization will do in the future. Strategic planning is a disciplined effort to produce decisions and actions that guide and shape what the organization is, what it does, and why it does it (Bryson, 1995). Both strategic planning and long range planning cover several years. However, strategic planning requires the organization to examine what it is and the environment in which it is working. Strategic planning also helps the organization to focus its attention on the crucial issues and challenges. It, therefore, helps the organization's leaders decide what to do about those issues and challenges. Each organization needs to decide for itself when the time is right for a strategic plan. It is sometimes easier to describe when the time is not right than when it is. For example, when the roof has blown off the building, an organization should replace it, not start strategic planning. The organization should get its crisis resolved, preferably by acting strategically, and then begin planning. Something less than a "roof-blown-off" crisis, however, usually prompts organizations to begin strategic planning. Some organizations find the loss of a significant funding source or, conversely, the opportunity to obtain a new source of funds, an impetus to plan. Other organizations recognize that their clients are changing and, therefore, they ought to prepare for these changes. And so on. There are as many reasons for starting a strategic planning process as there are profit and nonprofit organizations. What is risk management any way not everyone has the same meaning. It can be define as such Risk management is a process for identifying, assessing, and prioritizing risks of different kinds. Once the risks are identified, the risk manager will create a plan to minimize or eliminate the impact of negative events. A variety of strategies is available, depending on the type of risk and the type of business. There are a number of risk management standards, including those developed by the Project Management Institute, the International Organization for Standardization. Some may ask what does that mean, what is the purpose of risk management. The purpose for risk management was to protected people, and companies for example health care organization from losses that was associated with accident. There were many different type of risks for example, unexpected death, a doctor fail to diagnose or treat a disease, surgical mistake. Most of those were type of risk management had to deal with in the health care organization.
Using Never Events to Reduce Risk and Advance Patient Safety
While it is believed that having reliable information about the occurrence of the most egregious health care errors that cause patient harm will lead to improvements in patient safety, the primary reason for identifying a standardized set of serious reportable events that would be reported on a mandatory basis was to facilitate public accountability for the occurrence of these adverse events in the delivery of health care. Originally, the intention of developing a consensus list of reportable events was to create the core of a national State-based event reporting system that would increase the public accountability of health care. For purposes of this project, public accountability was considered to be the obligation or duty of specific individuals and/or institutions to make information about their actions or performance available to the public or a public agency that has responsibility for oversight and is answerable to the general public. Reporting in this context is a different matter than whether or how the reported information might be disclosed to the public after being reported to the responsible agency. Reporting and disclosure are often misunderstood as being the same. The public expects health care providers to take all appropriate measures to ensure that care is safe, and the public looks to government and other oversight bodies to make sure that such actions are taken. The occurrence of a serious preventable adverse event in health care operating on the wrong patient or wrong body part or transfusing the wrong type of blood into a patient suggests that a flaw exists in the health care organization's efforts to safeguard patients. It is reasonable for the public to expect an oversight body to investigate such occurrences. In many ways, this is analogous to the reporting of airplane crashes, train derailments, and school bus or tractor-trailer truck crashes. When these types of events occur, the public expects that they will be reported to a responsible transportation oversight agency, investigated, and steps taken to eliminate or remedy whatever caused the event to prevent such occurrences from happening in the future. These serious reportable events are health care's equivalent of airplane or other public-transportation crashes. Accountability entails both an obligation of health care providers to report on their performance and of oversight bodies to investigate specified occurrences and to enforce compliance with accepted standards of care for ensuring safety. Both parties have a responsibility to use the information to improve public safety. Having a standardized set of reportable adverse events should facilitate fulfillment of this obligation. What is the goal or the idea behind risk management one of their focus is to reduce the financial risk other areas that may seem not important is the regulation. One of the principal issues facing health care risk management is governmental regulation. Over the last few decades, there has been a growing public demand for accountability in health care delivery. The consequent tightening of governmental regulation has led to a greater allocation of an organization's resources to regulatory compliance. Some states, including New York, enacted stringent incident reporting requirements for hospitals, requiring additional staff to investigate and prepare such reports. Additionally, competition among hospitals has also fostered a greater concern over the community's perception of quality of care. Many hospitals have had to compete harder for patients as inpatient lengths of stay decrease and more procedures are performed on an outpatient basis. (Challan, 1992).
Governance and Board Responsibility to Assure Safety in Health Care Organizations
To understand the complexities of governance in healthcare organizations, one needs to be aware of the changes that are currently taking place in the healthcare industry. Pointer and Orlikoff, in their book Board Work: Governing Health Care Organizations, wrote that providing and financing healthcare services are going through a revolutionary change driven by healthcare customers and purchasers who they are, how they want to pay, and what they are demanding. Managed care has become a central philosophy for the healthcare services delivery in the United States. In response, healthcare organizations are undertaking proportionate transformations to survive. The organizations are beginning to shift focus from process to outcome and significantly redesign the services they provide. Vertically and horizontally integrated healthcare organizations, capable of providing a full range of services, are being created. The transformation processes affect the organizations' vision, missions, goals, strategies, structure, and key competencies and capacities. Regardless of the exact design healthcare organizations assume to address these revolutionary changes, the quality of their governance has become a necessity to them numerous practitioner-oriented publications have expressed concern that the contributions and performance of many healthcare boards are less than optimal. According to Anthony and Young, in many nonprofit organizations the line of leadership responsibility is f unclear. Unlike for-profit organizations, nonprofit groups have no shareholders, trustees are seldom paid for their services, and trustees often are appointed for financial or political reasons rather than their capability to exercise sound judgment regarding the organization's management. In some institutions, a widely quoted maxim states that the purpose of a board is only to hire a president and then support him or her. Furthermore, performance of some healthcare boards has been under severe strain; disputes over the quality of governance are increasingly overflowing from board rooms into courtrooms. Peregrine and Schwartz noted that allegations of breach of fiduciary duty were at the core of the state attorney general challenges to proposed closures of several hospitals in New York City and West Palm Beach. “Board negligence is frequently alleged in 'imprudent investment' actions brought by attorney generals against failed nonprofit investment practices” (p. 23). Kazemek, Knecht, and Westfall stated that in many of the cases where high-profile health systems and hospitals have been on to the boards of trustees exercise considerable power. They can audit the performance of an organization, hire and fire executives, and make major strategic decisions. If the potential power of the board is misused or not used at all, the trustees do not contribute to organizational effectiveness and, therefore, do not serve the stakeholders. The board's membership composition is a critical determinant of the types of power a board will have and how the board will exercise that power. Research has suggested three types of power that are particularly pertinent with respect to boards: personal, expert, and position. Personal power is based on the personality of the individual; it is independent of an individual's formal position or authority. Expert power is based on the individual's knowledge and information. Position power is based on the individual's formal position and is usually spelled out in the organization's bylaws and operating procedures. A number of studies have indicated that trustees' power, particularly the readiness to use that power, is strongly associated with the positions held beyond their board participation. Specifically, outside directors with no business ties to the organization or its executives are more willing to exercise their power than inside directors, particularly discussing matters that involve questioning the performance and challenging the decisions of senior management. Therefore, at present, boards prefer to appoint outsiders independent of the CEO and other senior management.
Carver and Carver stated that the board speaks authoritatively only when it passes a formal motion at a properly constituted meeting. Any other statements by individual board members have no authority. The board speaks exclusively with one voice. In other words, the one voice principle helps to distinguish what the board has said from what it has not said. This principle requires all board members to respect board decisions. Furthermore, board decisions can be changed only by the board and never by individual board members. Hence, board practices must demonstrate that the board, not individual trustees, has authority. As governance scholar Howe suggested, the board of a nonprofit organization is responsible for the effectiveness and welfare of the whole organization; therefore, the board must ensure strategic planning. It is advantageous for boards to create a standing or ad hoc committee to make plans for planning. In other words, this committee is to make recommendations on how, when, and where planning should take place. The executive staff members often play a pivotal role making sure that the planning team has all necessary information and ultimately implementing the plan. As the result of the strategic planning process, the planning team devises a modification or reaffirmation of the mission statement and the vision that will drive the system or hospital. Kazemek et al. (5) stated that this type of strategic thinking involves a complete analysis of the current state of affairs as well as understanding of all the available options and the likely ramifications of various strategies’ verge of financial collapse or declared bankruptcy, their boards were major contributors to their problems.

Now whenever there are no constant change things will remain as business as usual. Good change will require people to be flexible able to adopt with new ideas especially with new technology. Delivery of safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable care in a contemporary health care setting requires successful strategic integration of the various departments, programs, and procedures of the particular health care system. To achieve this goal in any health care system, the evaluation of the health system must take place. Evaluating the health care system can bring about needed change that can benefit the system while increasing the effectiveness of health care delivery for the patient, institution, and community. Evaluating health care systems includes analyzing the degrees of effectiveness, efficiency, and equity the system provides (Aday, Begley, Lairson, & Balkrishnan, 2004). Effectiveness describes the improvement of health in patients or populations the health care system serves. Administrative procedures, risk management programs, and epidemiological focuses contribute to the total system effectiveness. Efficiency depends on the health system’s available resources and the methods by which the resources are put to use. In the health care economist’s view, health care is the output attainable by production and allocative efficiency (Aday et al., 2004). Optimum production and allocative efficiency is present when strong administrative policies and procedures, practical risk management programs, and ongoing quality improvement measures and evaluations are in place. In addition, marketing functions are important in attracting patients to receive the products and services the system has to offer from production. Attending to the concerns that can make a health care system better for the population it serves can help make the system more viable in the market by producing satisfied and possibly, healthier patients. Equity involves the degree to which health disparities exist and the methods by which the health system addresses the disparities. One of the entities risk manager have to deal with on a day-today bases is Joint Commission is an essential part of a hospital process. It is the accredited organization in the United States that define risk management in the health care organization. Their responsibly is the administrative activities that deal with evaluation, and reduce the injury a patients, staff, and visitors in the health care organization. In every hospital a surgery has a potential for an undesirable outcome. Sometime a risk manager may have all kind of medical preventions things will happen. With a little bit of common sense can prevent bad result of accident, for example a slippery floor in a high traffic area can an accident.
Now after a potential even like that is there a plan that is designed or implement to avoid any risk. Some people may think that just because a company has a risk management in place, that they have the recipes. Healthcare risk managers have an important role to play in helping their organizations achieve the goal of “Getting to Zero “serious safety events. But no amount of effort will bring us closer to zero if the hard work of risk managers is wasted on interventions that are not effective. And, as with the discipline of healthcare quality improvement, and patient safety more broadly, the status quo for healthcare risk management is that we simply don’t know enough about what works and what doesn’t. (Youngberg, 2011) sometime a good plan from the risk manager may prevent many things on the hand other may been created also, for example the introduction to electronic medical record. Provider who were not afraid to technology did not know what to say, because this technology made their job easier. Now on the hand risk managers did not know what plan to put together who to call, because there were so much invasion to patient privacy it was out of control. Privacy is a fairly complex idea, particularly when you mix in advertising-supported media as it has developed in the past 50 years. The purpose of advertising is to make consumers aware of products and services. At its best, advertising supplies needed information to solve problems people actually have. At its worst, it is used to create demand by inventing a problem and providing a solution. In any case, we've grown to accept advertising as the cost of receiving free television and radio or discounted newspapers and magazines. (Zelnick, 1999). Risk managers could not have been happier with the creation of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. That was created for people to have access to quality health care coverage (like the Obama care), and also to protected the privacy of patient information in the health organization. Inclusion every day risk managers make decision, that impact patients and their families. A single error can cause a damage that is irreversible to patient life. If that was not enough to deal with they have to deal with the risk of health information security breaches, privacy violation, and noncompliance internal fraud. Risk management in its purest form is typically a hybrid function bridging a number of disciplines to reduce the incidence of organizational loss. Activities can be proactive, attempting to prevent or mitigate a loss or reactive – in other words, damage control. I’m confident that most healthcare organizations would agree that they have a risk management program, but is it proactive or reactive? Proactive risk management may avoid some losses and expenses that could otherwise impact your bottom line. Now in the end what is the government role when it come Legislative and Regulatory Issues Impacting Risk Management and Patient Safety. Compliance risk management is critical to the success of regulatory compliance operations. A robust risk management program allows health care organizations to identify weaknesses in internal controls and systems, and minimize financial and other losses by reducing exposure to potential overpayments, civil or criminal penalties, and administrative sanctions, such as program exclusions. Strategic Management’s strong team of experts have assisted hundreds of organizations with regulatory compliance and program integrity advisory services, such as assessing and evaluating compliance with high-risk areas. The focus of Strategic Management’s Risk Management services is on regulatory compliance risks and areas that may give rise to potential liability. The objective is always to integrate compliance risk management into the overall business strategy of the organization. Compliance risk management is a continuous, dynamic process of gathering, analyzing and updating information to ensure ongoing compliance with government rules and regulations. Compliance risk management begins with identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing regulatory risks associated with the daily operations, and continues with the implementation, monitoring, auditing, and routine reporting of control strategies.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...Chapter 1 6 1. INTRODUCTION TO RISK MANAGEMENT 6 1.1. Risk Management-An Overview 6 1.2. IMPORTANCE OF THE RESEARCH 7 1.3. RISK MANAGEMENT EMERGANCE-REASONS AND FACTS 8 1.4. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 9 1.5. LIMITATION OF RESEARCH 10 CHAPTER 2 11 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 11 2.1. DEFINITION OF RISK MANAGEMENT 11 2.2. DIFFERENT TYPES OF RISKS IN BUSINESS 12 2.3. CONSTRAINTS 14 2.4. RISK ASSESSMENT 14 2.5. HISTORY OF RISK MANAGEMENT 15 2.6. PROCESS OF RISK MANAGEMENT 15 2.7. Enterprise Risk Management 16 2.8. ERM&CRO 18 2.9. BANKING RISK 19 2.10. Credit risk management in UK banking sector 19 CHAPTER 3 21 3. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 21 3.1. ECONOMIC CRISIS AND BANKS OF UK 21 3.2. Minimizing the moral difficulties involved in the originate and distribute model of banking. 22 3.3. Transparency of risk in financial products is essential if regulation is to work 22 3.4. Reform Basel ii so that it is not so pro-cyclical 23 3.5. RISK MANAGEMENT AND COSTS OF BANKING CRISIS 24 3.6. Costs of Risk 25 3.7. SIGNIFICANCE OF REGULATORY STYLE 26 3.8. KEY WAYS TO MITIGATE BUSINESS RISK 27 3.9. Risk dash board every bank needs 28 3.10. ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND 29 3.11. RISK MANAGEMENT AT KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK (KCB) 29 3.12. Risk management in hotel and tourism industry in India and in the whole world 30 3.13. The management of risk in agricultural sector in the United States of America 31 3.14. THE ROLE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS IN RISK MANAGEMENT 33 4. CONCLUSION AND......

Words: 13332 - Pages: 54

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...Structure for an IT Risk Management Plan Course Name and Number: _____________________________________________________ Student Name: ________________________________________________________________ Instructor Name: ______________________________________________________________ Lab Due Date: ________________________________________________________________ Overview In this lab, you defined the purpose of an IT risk management plan, you defined the scope for an IT risk management plan that encompasses the seven domains of a typical IT infrastructure, you related the risks, threats, and vulnerabilities to the plan, and you created an IT risk management plan outline that incorporates the five major parts of an IT risk management process. Lab Assessment Questions & Answers 1. What is the goal or objective of an IT risk management plan? 2. What are the five fundamental components of an IT risk management plan? 3. Define what risk planning is. 4. What is the first step in performing risk management? 5. What is the exercise called when you are trying to gauge how significant a risk is? 25 6. What practice helps address a risk? 7. What ongoing practice helps track risk in real time? 8. True or False: Once a company completes all risk management steps (identification, assessment, response, and monitoring), the task is done. 9. Given that an IT risk management plan can be large in scope, why is it a good idea to develop a risk management plan......

Words: 434 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...RISK MANAGEMENT FOR COLLABORATIVE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT MOJGAN MOHTASHAMI is a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Management of Rutgers University and a lecturer at New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT). She can be reached at mojgan@oak.njit.edu. THOMAS MARLOWE is a professor of mathematics and computer science at Seton Hall University. He received Ph.D.s from Rutgers in 1975 and 1989. VASSILKA KIROVA received a Ph.D. in computer science from NJIT. Her areas of interest include specification and software productivity and quality. She can be reached at kirova@bell-labs.com. FADI P. DEEK is professor and dean of the College of Science and Liberal Arts at NJIT. His research interests include software engineering and learning systems. Mojgan Mohtashami, Thomas Marlowe, Vassilka Kirova, and Fadi P. Deek Collaborative software development involving multiple organizational units, often spanning national, language, and cultural boundaries, raises new challenges and risks that can derail software development projects even when traditional risk factors are being controlled. This article presents a framework that can be used to manage collaborative software development projects, based on an extended set of risk management principles. Three risk factors — trust, culture, and collaborative communication — are discussed in depth. OLLABORATIVE SOFTWARE DEVELOPment (CSD) entails multiple teams, working for multiple organizational units within the same or different companies, and no......

Words: 6555 - Pages: 27

Premium Essay

Management of Risk

...RISK MANAGEMENT – AN AREA OF KNOWLEDGE FOR ALL ENGINEERS A Discussion Paper By: Paul R. Amyotte, P.Eng.1 & Douglas J. McCutcheon, P.Eng.2 Chemical Engineering Program Department of Process Engineering & Applied Science Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 2X4 2 1 Industrial Safety & Loss Management Program Faculty of Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G6 Prepared For: The Research Committee of the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers October 2006 SUMMARY The purpose of this paper is to “seed” the discussion by the Research Committee of the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers (CCPE) on the topic of risk management. The paper is in part a research paper and in its entirety a position paper. As can be inferred from the title, the authors hold the firm opinion that risk management is an area of knowledge with which all engineers should have familiarity and a level of competence according to their scope of practice. The paper first makes the distinction between hazard and risk. The two terms are often used interchangeably when in fact they are quite different. A hazard is a chemical or physical condition that has the potential to cause harm or damage to people, environment, assets or production. Risk, on the other hand, is the possibility or chance of harm arising from a hazard; risk is a function of probability and severity of consequences. A description of the process of risk management is then given....

Words: 14427 - Pages: 58

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...Risk management In this section a summarized position of various risks facing DBBL while conducting its business and operations and steps taken by the Bank to effectively manage and mitigate such risks are discussed. RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Risk is defined by DBBL as risk of potential losses or foregone profits that can be triggered by internal and external factors. Therefore, the objectives of risk management are identification of potential risks in our operations and transactions, in our assets, liabilities, income, cost and off-balance sheet exposures and independent measurement and assessment of such risks and taking timely and adequate measures to manage and mitigate such risks within a risk-return framework. In DBBL, only calculated risks are taken while conducting banking business to strike a balance between risk and return. Risk is clearly identified, mitigated or minimized and if possible eliminated to protect capital and to maximize value for shareholders. It is also ensured that on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet risks taken by the Bank are consistent with risk appetite and short term as well as long term strategic objectives of the Bank. A wide range of tools and techniques are used to address & mitigate all kinds of inherent and potential risks in banking operations. The Bank attaches highest priority to establish, maintain and upgrade risk management infrastructure, systems and procedures. In this regard, sufficient resources are allocated to......

Words: 2576 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...Running Head: RISK MANAGEMENT Risk Management Jennifer Sprague HCS 451- Health Care Quality Management and Outcomes Analysis May 16, 2011 Isamel Caicedo When looking at organizations and the risks that they have to manage on a daily basis, we see where policies, procedures, and outcomes come into play. Though risks are different and challenge organizations in different ways, there are steps that every organization should take to identify and manage their risks. These risks that organizations take affect not only the organization but the stakeholders as well. There are types of education, training, and/or policies that help the hospital to mitigate risks within the organization. Through the risks that organizations take, the purpose of the risk management team shines through to prove that these organizations can compete with others and rise above other organizations. The main purpose of risk management in the health care organizations are described in Chapter 1 of the Risk Management Handbook stating, “… health care risk management has moved from a discipline focused almost exclusively on medical professional liability issues to a profession concerned with all risks associate with accidental losses facing a health care organization,” (Carroll, 2009). This statement shows the health care organizations not only are trying to protect their company as a whole, but everyone and everything involved. In the hospital setting, “providers have come to......

Words: 1231 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...Risk Management: Over the past decade, risk and uncertainty have increasingly become major issues which impact business activities. Many organizations are raising awareness to minimize the adverse consequences by implementing the process of Risk Management Framework which plays a significant role in mitigating almost all categories of risks. According to Ward (2005), the objective of risk management is to enhance a company’s performance. In particular, the importance of the framework is to assist top management in developing a sensible risk management strategy and program. In an effort to effectively use the risk management process frameworks, it is important to differentiate between risk and uncertainty. There is a tendency to claim that the process of the COSO framework and SHAMPU framework are more appropriate to further explain and deal with the issues of uncertainty and risk. This essay will first define risk and uncertainty. In the second section, it will introduce the process of two frameworks namely the COSO framework and the SHAMPU framework. It will evaluate the performance of the two different alternative risk management frameworks to distinguish different between risk and uncertainty. Finally, an opinion will be expressed if the effective use of risk management process frameworks depends upon an ability to differentiate between risk and uncertainty. Ward (2005) points out that different people have different viewpoints about risks and uncertainties.......

Words: 2006 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...Q 1: Advantage: 1. Risk identification: If all the risks have been identified at the beginning of a business project, the outcome and the solution of the risks can be considered before start and reduce potential lost. 2. Reduce compliance costs: The unprofitable part of the business can be eliminated or outsourced after risk analysis so that the risk is transferred. Reducing the areas of responsible business will allow the company to devote resources to the most profitable parts and eliminate the risks that were associated with those abandoned segments. 3. Enhance quality of product or service: The chance of emergency cases have been reduced so that the quality of product or service can be ensured at a certain level. 4. Increase efficiency and productivity: All risks have been figured out so that staff can be easily to distributed at suitable position and thus increase the efficiency. The productivity will be strengthened by practical division of labour and specification. 5. Improve relationships communication with stakeholders: Each identified risk can be discussed among various stakeholders to eliminate or minimize the risks assessed. This brings the various views onto the table and in the process of finalizing potential solutions as all stakeholders (including clients, employees, suppliers and contractors, etc.)are involved. 6. Enhance business planning and achievement of objectives and goals: Each risk is described along with its attributes such......

Words: 690 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...Paula Abadía Risk management Companies in every part of the world are exposed to many different threats and unexpected things; these are called risks. Risks can be any factor affecting the performance of projects, and causing a negative effect on them. In order for companies to be successful, they should always take into consideration the process of risk management. Risk management is a logical process or approach that seeks to eliminate, or at least minimize the level of risk associated with a business operation. It ensures that an organization identifies and understands the risks to which it is exposed. This process also guarantees the creation and implementation of effective plans, to prevent losses or reduce the impact if a loss occurs. Risk management has five main steps. First, identify and analyze exposures. Companies need to asses not only key risk areas, but also every single risk area that can harm their business. Along with this step of identification and analysis, the likelihood and impact of the risks should be measured. Companies should rank risks in order of importance, before moving to the next step. The second step is examining risk management techniques. In this step, companies must develop all the possible options that can help to manage risks successfully. The third step is the selection of the risk management technique. The chosen technique must be based on the previous analysis that the company should have done, so that it is the best alternative for...

Words: 979 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...Volume–VI, Number–01, January-June, 2011 Risk Management Practices: A Critical Diagnosis of Some Selected Commercial Banks in Bangladesh MD. ZAHANGIR ALAM* MD. MASUKUJJAMAN** ABSTRACT The paper is about risk management practices of commercial banks in Bangladesh based on five commercial banks operating in Bangladesh. The number of respondents was 25, five from each bank. While collecting the requisite data, five points Likert Scale has been used. The objective of the study was to critically examine risk management practices of Bangladeshi banks i.e., types of risk facing a bank, procedure and techniques used to minimize the risk etc. The study also examines how far the banks follow the guidelines of Bangladesh Bank regarding risk management. The study reveals that credit risk, market risk and operational risk are the major risks to the bankers which are managed through three layers of management system. The Board of Directors performs the responsibility of the main risk oversight, the Executive Committee monitors risk and the Audit Committee oversees all the activities of banking operations. In the context of opinions regarding use of risk management techniques, it is found that internal rating system and risk adjusted rate of return on capital are relatively more important techniques used by banks. Key Words: Risk, Risk Management, Risk Management Techniques, Banking. 1. INTRODUCTION In the past two decades, the banking industry has evolved from...

Words: 6095 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...Chapter 1 – Risk What is risk Something that could go wrong or go right Concept based on perspective dependent on personal opinion Underwriter- one who looks and rates policys on whether the insurance comp is going to offer insurance. Risk for underwriter: that’s what they ensure or underwrite * Risk Management Uncertainty concerning loss The difference between expected losses and actual losses Possibility of variation of outcomes from given situation Chance or possibility of a loss Loss exposures: any condition or situation that presents a possibility of loss. Examples picture of store Product liability Slippery floors Case application Michael is a college student majoring in marketing, he owns the following A high mileage 2003 ford that has a current market value of $2500 Retain exposure loss Liability law suit- driving negligent Liability insurance Clothes tv cell phone and other personal prop value at $10,000 Fire caught in kitchen Protection of things- loss reduction, property insuranace Disposable contact value at $200 for a six mo. Supply Disapearanve of contact lense Retain that loss Gets jumped Avoidance Types of risk Pure risk House damaged by fire One family Plant explosion River overflows Speculative risk Invester purchases 100 shares of stock Slot machines Diversified One family Plant explosion Non diversified Department of homeland security alerts a large group River overflows Home buyers are effected by interest rates Risk Management- process, takes......

Words: 508 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...Introduction Risk management is the process of identifying vulnerabilities and threats to information resources used by a company in reaching business objectives and deciding what measures to take in reducing risk to an acceptable level. An effectual risk management process is an essential component of a successful IT security program. The paramount goal of an organization's risk management process should be to protect the organization and its ability to perform their mission, not just its IT assets. With that in mind, the risk management process should not be treated primarily as a technical function by IT experts, but rather as an essential management function of the organization. The objective of performing risk management is to enable the organization to accomplish its mission(s) (1) by better securing the IT systems that store, process, or transmit organizational information; (2) by enabling management to make well-informed risk management decisions to justify the expenditures that are part of an IT budget; and (3) by assisting management in authorizing (or accrediting) the IT systems on the basis of the supporting documentation resulting from the performance of risk management . “Effective risk management begins with a clear understanding of the organization's appetite for risk2. This drives all risk management efforts and impacts future investments in technology. Risk management encompasses four key elements: Risk identification, risk mitigation,......

Words: 3059 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

It Risk Management

...Information Technology Risk Management Risk management is the continuing method to recognize, examine, appraise, and treat loss exposures and monitor risk control and financial resources to diminish the adverse effects of loss (Marquette). Every company has a goal. In this internet age, as companies use computerized information technology systems to manage their data for better support of their goals, risk management plays a crucial role in defending a company’s information technology‘s resources and its goals from information technology’s risk. A successful risk management method is an important component of an effective information technology security program. The primary goal of a companies risk management method should be to protect the company and its ability to accomplish their task, not just its information technology’s assets. Therefore, the risk management method should not be treated primarily as a technical function carried out by the information technology professionals who control and administer the information technology system, but as a necessary management function of the company (Stonebrner). Risk management is the method that allows information technology supervisors to assess the operational and economic expenses of protective measures and achieve gains in operational capability by keeping the information technology systems and records that support their company’s goals. This method is not unique to the information technology environment; indeed......

Words: 1274 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...construction is the a major and any productivity enhancement activity in this sector will have a positive impact in overall improvement of the national economy. The Nepalese construction industry is still regarded as in infant stage, can play a vital role to uplift the economic and socio status of local people by developing such infrastructures. In addition there are many risks faced by the construction industry in order to achieve its aim. 1.2. Objective of the study The major objective of this report writing is to understand various risk faced by an industry or an organizations and their ways and techniques to handle all these risk. But apart from that the other objectives of this study are: 1. To understand different types of risk facing organization. 2. To understand the trend of risk analysis in Nepalese construction market. 3. To know the techniques used to manage loss exposure unit 4. To find out the problem faced while managing risk 5. To know what methods are usually followed to reduce risks in construction companies? 6. To know benefits and significance of risk management 1.3. Research methodology There are many methods of collecting data. For the purpose of preparation of this report, direct interviews with respondents were taken and questionnaires were prepared. However secondary sources of data like annual general report and other journals...

Words: 2406 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Risk Management

...Manage risk Every business faces risks that could present threats to its success. Risk is defined as the probability of an event and its consequences. Risk management is the practice of using processes, methods and tools for managing these risks. Risk management focuses on identifying what could go wrong, evaluating which risks should be dealt with and implementing strategies to deal with those risks. Businesses that have identified the risks will be better prepared and have a more cost-effective way of dealing with them. This guide sets out how to identify the risks your business may face. It also looks at how to implement an effective risk management policy and program which can increase your business' chances of success and reduce the possibility of failure. * The risk management process * The types of risk your business faces * Strategic and compliance risks * Financial and operational risks * How to evaluate risks * Use preventative measures for business continuity * How to manage risks * Choose the right insurance to protect against losses The risk management process Businesses face many risks, therefore risk management should be a central part of any business' strategic management. Risk management helps you to identify and address the risks facing your business and in doing so increase the likelihood of successfully achieving your businesses objectives. A risk management process involves: * methodically identifying the risks surrounding your......

Words: 3682 - Pages: 15